Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “stalled replication fork”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 145 records · Page 8Linked to original sources
PubMed2002

Wild-type p53 inhibits replication-associated homologous recombination.

In mammalian cells homologous recombination is stimulated, when the replication fork stalls at DNA breaks or unrepaired lesions. The tumor suppressor p53 downregulates homologous recombination independently of its transcriptional transactivation function and has been linked to enzymes of DNA recombination and replication. To study recombination with respect to replication, we utilized a SV40 virus based assay, to follow the synchronous events after primate cell infection. gamma-ray treatment at different times after viral entry unveiled an increase of interchromosomal exchange frequencies, when the damage was introduced during DNA synthesis. Elevated recombination frequencies were fully suppressed by p53. With respect to the downregulation of spontaneous recombination, we noticed a requirement for active p53 molecules, when replication started. After a transient treatment with replication inhibitors, we observed inhibition of the drug induced recombination by p53, particularly for the elongation inhibitor aphidicolin. Consequently, we propose that p53 is a surveillance factor of homologous recombination at replication forks, when they stall as a consequence of endogenous or of exogenously introduced damage.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

Evidence that yeast SGS1, DNA2, SRS2, and FOB1 interact to maintain rDNA stability.

We and others have proposed that faulty processing of arrested replication forks leads to increases in recombination and chromosome instability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Now we use the ribosomal DNA locus, which is a good model for all stages of DNA replication, to test this hypothesis. We showed previously that DNA replication pausing at the ribosomal DNA replication fork barrier (RFB) is accompanied by the occurrence of double-strand breaks near the RFB. Both pausing and breakage are elevated in the hypomorphic dna2-2 helicase mutant. Deletion of FOB1 suppresses the elevated pausing and DSB formation. Our current work shows that mutation inactivating Sgs1, the yeast RecQ helicase ortholog, also causes accumulation of stalled replication forks and DSBs at the rDNA RFB. Either deletion of FOB1, which suppresses fork blocking and certain types of rDNA recombination, or an increase in SIR2 gene dosage, which suppresses rDNA recombination, reduces the number of forks persisting at the RFB. Although dna2-2 sgs1Delta double mutants are conditionally lethal, they do not show enhanced rDNA defects compared to sgs1Delta alone. However, surprisingly, the dna2-2 sgs1Delta lethality is suppressed by deletion of FOB1. On the other hand, the dna2-2 sgs1Delta lethality is only partially suppressed by deletion of rad51Delta. We propose that the replication-associated defects that we document in the rDNA are characteristic of similar events occurring either stochastically throughout the genome or at other regions where replication forks move slowly or stall, such as telomeres, centromeres, or replication slow zones.

Adenosine Triphosphatases↗
PubMed1993

Association of fragile X syndrome with delayed replication of the FMR1 gene.

The fragile X syndrome is commonly associated with mutant alleles of the FMR1 gene that are hypermethylated and have large expansions of CGG repeats. We present data here on the replication timing of FMR1 that confirm predictions of delayed replication of alleles from affected males. The normal FMR1 allele replicates late in S phase, while alleles from affected males replicate later, the major peak of replication occurring in the flow cytometry fraction usually referred to as G2/M. The delayed timing of replication is not the direct result of a single replication fork stalling at the expanded CGG repeat, because delayed replication was observed for regions on both sides of the repeat. The domain of altered replication timing includes sites at least 150 kb 5' and 34 kb 3' of the repeat, indicating that genes in addition to FMR1 may be affected.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

A SUMOry of DNA replication: synthesis, damage, and repair.

Recombination at stalled replication forks is regulated at an early stage by sumoylation. In this issue of Cell, Branzei et al. show that the Ubc9/SUMO modification pathway controls the accumulation of cruciform structures at stalled forks.

DNA Damage↗
PubMed2000

Modulation of RNA polymerase by (p)ppGpp reveals a RecG-dependent mechanism for replication fork progression.

We have discovered a correlation between the ability of Escherichia coli cells to survive damage to DNA and their ability to modulate RNA polymerase via the stringent response regulators, (p)ppGpp. Elevation of (p)ppGpp, or certain mutations in the beta subunit of RNA polymerase, dramatically improve survival of UV-irradiated strains lacking the RuvABC Holliday junction resolvase. Increased survival depends on excision and recombination proteins and relies on the ability of RecG helicase to form Holliday junctions from replication forks stalled at lesions in the DNA and of PriA to initiate replication restart. The role of RecG provides novel insights into the interplay between transcription, replication, and recombination, and suggests a general model in which recombination underpins genome duplication in the face of frequent obstacles to replication fork progression.

Adenosine Triphosphatases↗
PubMed2005

Archaeal Hel308 helicase targets replication forks in vivo and in vitro and unwinds lagging strands.

Mutations in mammalian and Drosophila Hel308 and PolQ paralogues cause genome instability but their helicase functions are mysterious. By in vivo and in vitro analysis, we show that Hel308 from archaea (Hel308a) may act at stalled replication forks. Introducing hel308a into Escherichia coli dnaE strains that conditionally accumulate stalled forks caused synthetic lethality, an effect indistinguishable from E.coli RecQ. Further analysis in vivo indicated that the effect of hel308a is exerted independently of homologous recombination. The minimal biochemical properties of Hel308a protein were the same as human Hel308. We describe how helicase actions of Hel308a at fork structures lead specifically to displacement of lagging strands. The invading strand of D-loops is also targeted. Using archaeal Hel308, we propose models of action for the helicase domain of PolQ, promoting loading of the translesion polymerase domain. We speculate that removal of lagging strands at stalled forks by Hel308 promotes the formation of initiation zones, priming restart of lagging strand synthesis.

Archaeal Proteins↗
PubMed2005

The DNA damage response during DNA replication.

Eukaryotic chromosome replication is mediated by multiple replicons and is coordinated with sister chromatid cohesion, DNA recombination, transcription and cell cycle progression. Replication forks stall or collapse at DNA lesions or problematic genomic regions, and these events have often been associated with recombination and chromosomal rearrangements. Stalled forks generate single-stranded DNA that activates the replication checkpoint, which in turn functions to protect the stability of the fork until the replication can resume. Recombination-mediated and damage-bypass processes are the main mechanisms responsible for replication restart. New findings have helped to unmask the molecular mechanisms that sense replication stress, control the stability of replication forks, and regulate the mechanisms that promote replication restart, thereby giving us a better understanding of how genome integrity is preserved during replication.

DNA Damage↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Regulation of DNA replication by ATR: signaling in response to DNA intermediates.

The nuclear protein kinase ATR controls S-phase progression in response to DNA damage and replication fork stalling, including damage caused by ultraviolet irradiation, hyperoxia, and replication inhibitors like aphidicolin and hydroxyurea. ATR activation and substrate specificity require the presence of adapter and mediator molecules, ultimately resulting in the downstream inhibition of the S-phase kinases that function to initiate DNA replication at origins of replication. The data reviewed strongly support the hypothesis that ATR is activated in response to persistent RPA-bound single-stranded DNA, a common intermediate of unstressed and damaged DNA replication and metabolism.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

Taming the spindle for containing the chromosomes.

Checkpoint controls are critical for coordination of cell cycle events, especially during exposure to perturbations or stresses. The DNA replication checkpoint is activated in S phase in response to replication stresses that impede fork progression. Mec1 and Rad53 are critical effectors of this control pathway; they maintain the integrity of stalled replication forks and prevent premature segregation of unreplicated chromosomes. It has long been thought that the checkpoint inhibits precocious segregation of chromosomes by preventing early onset of mitosis. However, recent evidence suggests that the replication checkpoint thwarts untimely chromosome separation not by inhibiting mitotic entry but by directly regulating spindle dynamics. These findings raise a number of issues which may require a revisit to the well-trodden territories of cell cycle regulation.

Cdc20 Proteins↗
PubMed2005

Mrc1 is required for normal progression of replication forks throughout chromatin in S. cerevisiae.

Mrc1 associates with replication forks, where it transmits replication stress signals and is required for normal replisome pausing in response to nucleotide depletion. Mrc1 also plays a poorly understood role in DNA replication, which appears distinct from its role in checkpoint signaling. Here, we demonstrate that Mrc1 functions constitutively to promote normal replication fork progression. In mrc1Delta cells, replication forks proceed slowly throughout chromatin, rather than being specifically defective in pausing and progression through loci that impede fork progression. Analysis of genetic interactions with Rrm3, a DNA helicase required to resolve paused forks, indicates that Mrc1 checkpoint signaling is dispensable for the resolution of stalled replication forks and suggests that replication forks lacking Mrc1 create DNA damage that must be repaired by Rrm3. These findings elucidate a central role for Mrc1 in normal replisome function, which is distinct from its role as a checkpoint mediator, but nevertheless critical to genome stability.

Cell Cycle Proteins↗
PubMed2016

A mechanism for 1,4-Benzoquinone-induced genotoxicity.

Benzene is a common environmental toxin and its metabolite, 1-4-Benzoquinone (BQ) causes hematopoietic cancers like myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). BQ has not been comprehensively assessed for its impact on genome maintenance, limiting our understanding of the true health risks associated with benzene exposure and our ability to identify people with increased sensitivity to this genotoxin. Here we analyze the impact BQ exposure has on wild type and DNA repair-defective mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells and wild type human cells. We find that double strand break (DSB) repair and replication fork maintenance pathways including homologous recombination (HR) and Fanconi anemia (FA) suppress BQ toxicity. BQ-induced damage efficiently stalls replication forks, yet poorly induces ATR/DNA-PKCS responses. Furthermore, the pattern of BQ-induced γH2AX and 53BP1foci is consistent with the formation of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1)-stabilized regressed replication forks. At a biochemical level, BQ inhibited topoisomerase 1 (topo1)-mediated DNA ligation and nicking in vitro; thus providing mechanism for the cellular phenotype. These data are consistent with a model that proposes BQ interferes with type I topoisomerase's ability to maintain replication fork restart and progression leading to chromosomal instability that has the potential to cause hematopoietic cancers like MDS and AML.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

Phosphorylation of BLM, dissociation from topoisomerase IIIalpha, and colocalization with gamma-H2AX after topoisomerase I-induced replication damage.

Topoisomerase I-associated DNA single-strand breaks selectively trapped by camptothecins are lethal after being converted to double-strand breaks by replication fork collisions. BLM (Bloom's syndrome protein), a RecQ DNA helicase, and topoisomerase IIIalpha (Top3alpha) appear essential for the resolution of stalled replication forks (Holliday junctions). We investigated the involvement of BLM in the signaling response to Top1-mediated replication DNA damage. In BLM-complemented cells, BLM colocalized with promyelocytic leukemia protein (PML) nuclear bodies and Top3alpha. Fibroblasts without BLM showed an increased sensitivity to camptothecin, enhanced formation of Top1-DNA complexes, and delayed histone H2AX phosphorylation (gamma-H2AX). Camptothecin also induced nuclear relocalization of BLM, Top3alpha, and PML protein and replication-dependent phosphorylation of BLM on threonine 99 (T99p-BLM). T99p-BLM was also observed following replication stress induced by hydroxyurea. Ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) protein and AT- and Rad9-related protein kinases, but not DNA-dependent protein kinase, appeared to play a redundant role in phosphorylating BLM. Following camptothecin treatment, T99p-BLM colocalized with gamma-H2AX but not with Top3alpha or PML. Thus, BLM appears to dissociate from Top3alpha and PML following its phosphorylation and facilitates H2AX phosphorylation in response to replication double-strand breaks induced by Top1. A defect in gamma-H2AX signaling in response to unrepaired replication-mediated double-strand breaks might, at least in part, explain the camptothecin-sensitivity of BLM-deficient cells.

Active Transport, Cell Nucleus↗
PubMed1995

Head-on collision between a DNA replication apparatus and RNA polymerase transcription complex.

An in vitro system reconstituted from purified proteins has been used to examine what happens when the DNA replication apparatus of bacteriophage T4 collides with an Escherichia coli RNA polymerase ternary transcription complex that is poised to move in the direction opposite to that of the moving replication fork. In the absence of a DNA helicase, the replication fork stalls for many minutes after its encounter with the RNA polymerase. However, when the T4 gene 41 DNA helicase is present, the replication fork passes the RNA polymerase after a pause of a few seconds. This brief pause is longer than the pause observed for a codirectional collision between the same two polymerases, suggesting that there is an inherent disadvantage to having replication and transcription directions oriented head to head. As for a codirectional collision, the RNA polymerase remains competent to resume faithful RNA chain elongation after the DNA replication fork passes; most strikingly, the RNA polymerase has switched from its original template strand to use the newly synthesized daughter DNA strand as the template.

Bacteriophage T4↗
PubMed2004

Swi1 and Swi3 are components of a replication fork protection complex in fission yeast.

Swi1 is required for programmed pausing of replication forks near the mat1 locus in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. This fork pausing is required to initiate a recombination event that switches mating type. Swi1 is also needed for the replication checkpoint that arrests division in response to fork arrest. How Swi1 accomplishes these tasks is unknown. Here we report that Swi1 copurifies with a 181-amino-acid protein encoded by swi3(+). The Swi1-Swi3 complex is required for survival of fork arrest and for activation of the replication checkpoint kinase Cds1. Association of Swi1 and Swi3 with chromatin during DNA replication correlated with movement of the replication fork. swi1Delta and swi3Delta mutants accumulated Rad22 (Rad52 homolog) DNA repair foci during replication. These foci correlated with the Rad22-dependent appearance of Holliday junction (HJ)-like structures in cells lacking Mus81-Eme1 HJ resolvase. Rhp51 and Rhp54 homologous recombination proteins were not required for viability in swi1Delta or swi3Delta cells, indicating that the HJ-like structures arise from single-strand DNA gaps or rearranged forks instead of broken forks. We propose that Swi1 and Swi3 define a fork protection complex that coordinates leading- and lagging-strand synthesis and stabilizes stalled replication forks.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed2006

Rep and PriA helicase activities prevent RecA from provoking unnecessary recombination during replication fork repair.

The rescue of replication forks stalled on the template DNA was investigated using an assay for synthetic lethality that provides a visual readout of cell viability and permits investigation of why certain mutations are lethal when combined. The results presented show that RecA and other recombination proteins are often engaged during replication because RecA is present and provokes recombination rather than because recombination is necessary. This occurs particularly frequently in cells lacking the helicase activities of Rep and PriA. We propose that these two proteins normally limit the loading of RecA on ssDNA regions exposed on the leading strand template of damaged forks, and do so by unwinding the nascent lagging strand, thus facilitating reannealing of the parental strands. Gap closure followed by loading of the DnaB replicative helicase enables synthesis of the leading strand to continue. Without either activity, RecA loads more frequently on the DNA and drives fork reversal, which creates a chickenfoot structure and a requirement for other recombination proteins to re-establish a viable fork. The assay also reveals that stalled transcription complexes are common impediments to fork progression, and that damaged forks often reverse independently of RecA.

Adenosine Triphosphatases↗
PubMed2004

Recruitment of the cell cycle checkpoint kinase ATR to chromatin during S-phase.

The ataxia telangiectasia-mutated (ATM) and Rad3-related kinase (ATR) is a central component of the cell cycle checkpoint machinery required to induce cell cycle arrest in response to DNA damage. Accumulating evidence suggests a role for ATR in signaling DNA damage during S-phase. Here we show that ATR is recruited to nuclear foci induced by replication fork stalling in a manner that is dependent on the single stranded binding protein replication protein A (RPA). ATR associates with chromatin in asynchronous cell cultures, and we use a variety of approaches to examine the association of ATR with chromatin in the absence of agents that cause genotoxic stress. Under our experimental conditions, ATR exhibits a decreased affinity for chromatin in quiescent cells and cells synchronized at mitosis but an increased affinity for chromatin as cells re-enter the cell cycle. Using centrifugal elutriation to obtain cells enriched at various stages of the cell cycle, we show that ATR associates with chromatin in a cell cycle-dependent manner, specifically during S-phase. Cell cycle association of ATR with chromatin mirrors that of RPA in addition to claspin, a cell cycle checkpoint protein previously shown to be a component of the replication machinery. Furthermore, association of ATR with chromatin occurs in the absence of detectable DNA damage and cell cycle checkpoint activation. These data are consistent with a model whereby ATR is recruited to chromatin during the unperturbed cell cycle and points to a role of ATR in monitoring genome integrity during normal S-phase progression.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

p53 Monitors replication fork regression by binding to "chickenfoot" intermediates.

The tumor suppressor protein, p53, utilizes multiple mechanisms to ensure faithful transmission of the genome including regulation of DNA replication, repair, and recombination. Monitoring these pathways may involve direct binding of p53 to the DNA intermediates of these processes. In this study, we generated templates resembling stalled replication forks and utilized electron microscopy to examine p53 interactions with these substrates. Our results show that p53 bound with high affinity to the junction of stalled forks, whereas two cancer-derived p53 mutants showed weak binding. Additionally, some of the templates were rearranged to form "chickenfoot" structures in the presence of p53. These were mostly formed due to p53 trapping intermediates of spontaneous fork regression; however, in a small population, the protein appeared to be promoting their formation. Collectively, these results demonstrate the importance of sequence-independent binding in p53-mediated maintenance of genomic integrity.

Animals↗
PubMed1996

Role of the EBNA-1 protein in pausing of replication forks in the Epstein-Barr virus genome.

We have previously shown that replication forks stall at a family of repeated sequences (FR) within the Epstein-Barr virus latent origin of replication oriP, both in a small plasmid and in the intact Epstein-Barr virus genome. Each of the 20 repeated sequences within the FR contains a binding site for Epstein-Barr nuclear antigen 1 (EBNA-1), the only viral protein required for latent replication. We showed that the EBNA-1 protein enhances the accumulation of paused replication forks at the FR. In this study, we have investigated a series of truncated EBNA-1 proteins to determine the portion of the EBNA-1 protein that is responsible for pausing of forks at the FR. Two-dimensional agarose gel electrophoresis was performed on the products of in vitro replication reactions in the presence of full-length EBNA-1 or proteins with various deletions to assess the extent of fork pausing at the FR. We conclude that a portion of the DNA binding domain is important for fork pausing. We also present evidence indicating that phosphorylation of the EBNA-1 protein or EBNA-1-truncated derivatives is not essential for pausing. To investigate the mechanism of EBNA-1-mediated pausing of replication forks, we asked whether EBNA-1 could inhibit the DNA unwinding activity of replicative helicases. We found that EBNA-1, when bound to the FR, inhibits DNA unwinding in vitro by SV40 T antigen and Escherichia coli dnaB helicases in an orientation-independent manner.

Antigens, Polyomavirus Transforming↗