Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “replication stress”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 145 records · Page 8Linked to original sources
PubMed2024

Reversion from basal histone H4 hypoacetylation at the replication fork increases DNA damage in FANCA deficient cells.

The FA/BRCA pathway safeguards DNA replication by repairing interstrand crosslinks (ICL) and maintaining replication fork stability. Chromatin structure, which is in part regulated by histones posttranslational modifications (PTMs), has a role in maintaining genomic integrity through stabilization of the DNA replication fork and promotion of DNA repair. An appropriate balance of PTMs, especially acetylation of histones H4 in nascent chromatin, is required to preserve a stable DNA replication fork. To evaluate the acetylation status of histone H4 at the replication fork of FANCA deficient cells, we compared histone acetylation status at the DNA replication fork of isogenic FANCA deficient and FANCA proficient cell lines by using accelerated native immunoprecipitation of nascent DNA (aniPOND) and in situ protein interactions in the replication fork (SIRF) assays. We found basal hypoacetylation of multiple residues of histone H4 in FA replication forks, together with increased levels of Histone Deacetylase 1 (HDAC1). Interestingly, high-dose short-term treatment with mitomycin C (MMC) had no effect over H4 acetylation abundance at the replication fork. However, chemical inhibition of histone deacetylases (HDAC) with Suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA) induced acetylation of the FANCA deficient DNA replication forks to levels comparable to their isogenic control counterparts. This forced permanence of acetylation impacted FA cells homeostasis by inducing DNA damage and promoting G2 cell cycle arrest. Altogether, this caused reduced RAD51 foci formation and increased markers of replication stress, including phospho-RPA-S33. Hypoacetylation of the FANCA deficient replication fork, is part of the cellular phenotype, the perturbation of this feature by agents that prevent deacetylation, such as SAHA, have a deleterious effect over the delicate equilibrium they have reached to perdure despite a defective FA/BRCA pathway.

Histones↗
PubMed2006

ATRIP associates with replication protein A-coated ssDNA through multiple interactions.

The ATR (ATM- and rad3-related)-mediated checkpoint pathway has a crucial role in regulating the cellular responses to DNA damage and DNA-replication stress. ATRIP (ATR-interacting protein), the regulatory partner of ATR, binds directly to replication protein A (RPA)-coated ssDNA and enables the ATR-ATRIP complex to recognize this DNA damage-induced structure. Here, we show that ATRIP associates with RPA-ssDNA through multiple interactions. Two major RPA-ssDNA-interacting domains of ATRIP were mapped to the regions flanking the conserved coiled-coil domain. In contrast to a recent article, we found that ATRIP mutants lacking the N terminus retained the ability to bind to RPA-ssDNA, suggesting that the multiple interactions between ATRIP and RPA-ssDNA may function redundantly in the recruitment of ATR-ATRIP. Unexpectedly, one internal region of ATRIP exhibited affinity to ssDNA, suggesting that ATRIP may interact with ssDNA in the ATRIP-RPA-ssDNA complex. Also, the N terminus of ATRIP associated with RPA-ssDNA in two distinct ways, indicating a dynamic and regulated association between ATRIP and RPA-ssDNA.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗
PubMed2006

How cells activate ATR.

ATR is a critical upstream regulator of checkpoint responses to incompletely replicated and damaged DNA. However, it had not been understood how the kinase activity of ATR is switched on during checkpoint responses. TopBP1 and its homologs are necessary for both DNA replication and checkpoint control. A recent report from this laboratory demonstrated that TopBP1 functions as an activator of ATR. It had been known that TopBP1 accumulates at sites of replicative stress and DNA damage. Thus, interaction of ATR with a critical protein at stalled replication forks and sites of DNA damage triggers its activation. This finding helps to explain how aberrant DNA structures in the genome induce ATR-dependent signaling processes.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

"ATR activation in response to ionizing radiation: still ATM territory".

Unrepaired DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are a major cause for genomic instability. Therefore, upon detection of a DSB a rapid response must be assembled to coordinate the proper repair/signaling of the lesion or the elimination of cells with unsustainable amounts of DNA damage. Three members of the PIKK family of protein kinases -ATM, ATR and DNA-PKcs- take the lead and initiate the signaling cascade emanating from DSB sites. Whereas DNA-PKcs activity seems to be restricted to the phosphorylation of targets involved in DNA repair, ATM and ATR phosphorylate a broad spectrum of cell cycle regulators and DNA repair proteins. In the canonical model, ATM and ATR are activated by two different types of lesions and signal through two independent and alternate pathways. Specifically, ATR is activated by various forms of DNA damage, including DSBs, arising at stalled replication forks ("replication stress"), and ATM is responsible for the signaling of DSBs that are not associated with the replication machinery throughout the cell cycle. Recent evidence suggests that this model might be oversimplified and that coordinated crosstalk between ATM and ATR activation routes goes on at the core of the DNA damage response.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2024

FANCJ DNA helicase is recruited to the replisome by AND-1 to ensure genome stability.

FANCJ, a DNA helicase linked to Fanconi anemia and frequently mutated in cancers, counteracts replication stress by dismantling unconventional DNA secondary structures (such as G-quadruplexes) that occur at the DNA replication fork in certain sequence contexts. However, how FANCJ is recruited to the replisome is unknown. Here, we report that FANCJ directly binds to AND-1 (the vertebrate ortholog of budding yeast Ctf4), a homo-trimeric protein adaptor that connects the CDC45/MCM2-7/GINS replicative DNA helicase with DNA polymerase α and several other factors at DNA replication forks. The interaction between FANCJ and AND-1 requires the integrity of an evolutionarily conserved Ctf4-interacting protein (CIP) box located between the FANCJ helicase motifs IV and V. Disruption of the CIP box significantly reduces FANCJ association with the replisome, causing enhanced DNA damage, decreased replication fork recovery and fork asymmetry in cells unchallenged or treated with Pyridostatin, a G-quadruplex-binder, or Mitomycin C, a DNA inter-strand cross-linking agent. Cancer-relevant FANCJ CIP box variants display reduced AND-1-binding and enhanced DNA damage, a finding that suggests their potential role in cancer predisposition.

Humans↗
PubMed2005

Chk1 is essential for tumor cell viability following activation of the replication checkpoint.

Chk1 (checkpoint kinase 1) is an evolutionarily conserved serine/threonine kinase involved in DNA damage responses. Originally identified as a kinase regulating the G2/M transition checkpoint, its role has broadened to include the S-phase checkpoint response and essential functions in early embryonic development. In this manuscript we investigated the potential of chemo-sensitization via ablation of Chk1 in cells treated with anti-metabolite cancer drugs, hydroxyurea (HU) and cytosine arabinoside (ara-C). Exposure to these replication interfering drugs in cells carrying Chk1 targeted siRNA provoked markedly increased rates of apoptosis. Although cell death was accompanied by an increase in p53 and activation of Chk2, the increased susceptibility to apoptosis was not dependent on p53 or Chk2. Additionally, we found that cells with reduced Chk1 expression displayed increased gamma-H2A.X expression, a marker for damaged DNA, and phosphorylated 32kDa subunit of replication protein A (RPA). Thus, Chk1 may play an essential role in maintaining DNA integrity during the replication block. Significantly, normal cells such as WS1 did not exhibit increased DNA damage or subsequent increases in apoptosis following replication stress, in the absence of Chk1. Thus, the essential role Chk1 plays in maintaining viability during the replication block in cancer cell lines can be exploited to sensitize cancer cells when abrogation of Chk1 is combined with DNA anti-metabolite chemotherapeutic drugs. Taken together, these data suggest that inhibition of Chk1 in combination with DNA anti-metabolite chemotherapy is a viable therapeutic strategy.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed2025

Pathogenic variants in MAEA disrupt DNA replication fork stability and are associated with developmental abnormalities in humans.

Replication stress (RS) poses a threat to genome stability and drives genomic rearrangements. The homologous recombination (HR) pathway repairs stalled replication forks (RFs) and prevents such instability. Through an E3 ubiquitin ligase screen aimed at identifying regulators of RAD51, we identified macrophage erythroblast attacher (MAEA), a core component of C-terminal to Lish (CTLH) E3 ubiquitin ligase complex, as a regulator of the HR pathway. Loss of MAEA impairs RAD51 recruitment at stalled RFs, leading to increased sensitivity to RS-inducing agents and excessive degradation of nascent DNA strands. Mechanistically, MAEA associates with and mediates the ubiquitylation of Ku80, enabling its removal from RF ends and facilitating the loading of RAD51. Notably, MAEA deficiency is associated with a developmental disorder involving microcephaly, craniofacial abnormalities, ocular defects, and heart malformations. Functional assays show that disease-linked MAEA variants (R34C, E349G, Y394D, and M396R) are defective in RS response. These findings establish MAEA as an essential factor in RF protection and genome integrity.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Exploiting DNA damage tolerance for precision oncology.

Unresolved DNA lesions trigger replication stress, forcing cancer cells to hijack DNA damage tolerance (DDT) networks, specifically translesion synthesis (TLS) and template switching, to sustain replication. While DDT prevents lethal fork collapse, error-prone TLS drives mutagenesis, tumor evolution, chemoresistance and radioresistance. Proliferating cell nuclear antigen post-translational modifications dynamically govern pathway selection. Cancer cells exploit this plasticity, creating actionable vulnerabilities such as postreplicative single-stranded DNA gaps. Emerging inhibitors targeting TLS polymerases, upstream regulators such as ubiquitin-specific peptidase 1 (USP1), and critical protein-protein interactions offer unprecedented opportunities for precision oncology. By integrating DDT inhibition with biomarkers such as homologous recombination deficiency and tumor mutational burden, we can drive synthetic lethality, sensitize tumors to genotoxic agents, suppress treatment-induced mutagenesis, and potentially enhance responses to immunotherapy.

DDT↗
PubMed2000

Temporally coordinated assembly and disassembly of replication factories in the absence of DNA synthesis.

Here we show that exposure of aphidicolin-arrested Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells to the protein-kinase inhibitors 2-aminopurine or caffeine results in initiation of replication at successively later-replicating chromosomal domains, loss of the capacity to synthesize DNA at earlier-replicating sites, release of Mcm2 proteins from chromatin, and redistribution of PCNA and RPA from early- to late-replicating domains in the absence of detectable elongation of replication forks. These results provide evidence that, under conditions of replicational stress, checkpoint controls not only prevent further initiation but may also be required to actively maintain the integrity of stalled replication complexes.

2-Aminopurine↗
PubMed2006

Replication-dependent DNA damage response triggered by roscovitine induces an uncoupling of DNA replication proteins.

The cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitor roscovitine is under evaluation in clinical trials for its antiproliferative properties. Roscovitine arrests cell cycle progression in G(1) and in G(2) phase by inhibiting CDK2 and CDK1, and possibly CDK7 and CDK9. However, the effects of CDK2 inhibition in S-phase cells have been not fully investigated. Here, we show that a short-term treatment with roscovitine is sufficient to inhibit DNA synthesis, and to activate a DNA damage checkpoint response, as indicated by phosphorylation of p53-Ser15, replication protein A, and histone H2AX. Analysis of DNA replication proteins loaded onto DNA during S phase showed that the amount of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), a cofactor of DNA replication enzymes, was significantly reduced by roscovitine. In contrast, chromatin-bound levels of DNA polymerase delta, DNA ligase I and CDK2, were stabilized. Checkpoint inhibition with caffeine could rescue PCNA disassembly only partially, pointing to additional effects due to CDK2 inhibition and the presence of replication stress. These results suggest that in S-phase cells, roscovitine induces checkpoint-dependent and -independent effects, leading to stabilization of replication forks and an uncoupling between PCNA and PCNA-interacting proteins.

Cell Proliferation↗
PubMed2005

Regulated degradation of replication-dependent histone mRNAs requires both ATR and Upf1.

Eukaryotic cells coordinately regulate histone and DNA synthesis. In mammalian cells, most of the regulation of histone synthesis occurs post-transcriptionally by regulating the concentrations of histone mRNA. As cells enter S phase, histone mRNA levels increase, and at the end of S phase they are rapidly degraded. Moreover, inhibition of DNA synthesis causes rapid degradation of histone mRNAs. Replication-dependent histone mRNAs are the only metazoan mRNAs that are not polyadenylated. Instead, they end with a conserved stem-loop structure, which is the only cis-acting element required for coupling regulation of histone mRNA half-life with DNA synthesis. Here we show that regulated degradation of histone mRNAs requires Upf1, a key regulator of the nonsense-mediated decay pathway, and ATR, a key regulator of the DNA damage checkpoint pathway activated during replication stress.

Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated Proteins↗
PubMed2004

DNA replication checkpoint prevents precocious chromosome segregation by regulating spindle behavior.

The DNA replication checkpoint maintains replication fork integrity and prevents chromosome segregation during replication stresses. Mec1 and Rad53 (human ATM/ATR- and Chk2-like kinases, respectively) are critical effectors of this pathway in yeast. When treated with replication inhibitors, checkpoint-deficient mec1 or rad53 mutant fails to maintain replication fork integrity and proceeds to partition unreplicated chromosomes. We show that this unnatural chromosome segregation requires neither the onset of mitosis nor APC activation, cohesin cleavage, or biorientation of kinetochores. Instead, the checkpoint deficiency leads to deregulation of microtubule-associated proteins Cin8 and Stu2, which, in the absence of both chromosome cohesion and bipolar attachment of kinetochores to microtubules, induce untimely spindle elongation, causing premature chromosome separation. The checkpoint's ability to prevent nuclear division is abolished by combined deficiency of microtubule-destabilizing motor Kip3 and Mad2 functions. Thus, the DNA replication checkpoint prevents precocious chromosome segregation, not by inhibiting entry into mitosis as widely believed, but by directly regulating spindle dynamics.

Blotting, Northern↗
PubMed2005

Mrc1 is required for normal progression of replication forks throughout chromatin in S. cerevisiae.

Mrc1 associates with replication forks, where it transmits replication stress signals and is required for normal replisome pausing in response to nucleotide depletion. Mrc1 also plays a poorly understood role in DNA replication, which appears distinct from its role in checkpoint signaling. Here, we demonstrate that Mrc1 functions constitutively to promote normal replication fork progression. In mrc1Delta cells, replication forks proceed slowly throughout chromatin, rather than being specifically defective in pausing and progression through loci that impede fork progression. Analysis of genetic interactions with Rrm3, a DNA helicase required to resolve paused forks, indicates that Mrc1 checkpoint signaling is dispensable for the resolution of stalled replication forks and suggests that replication forks lacking Mrc1 create DNA damage that must be repaired by Rrm3. These findings elucidate a central role for Mrc1 in normal replisome function, which is distinct from its role as a checkpoint mediator, but nevertheless critical to genome stability.

Cell Cycle Proteins↗
PubMed2003

Rad53: a controller ensuring the fine-tuning of histone levels.

Checkpoint proteins are activated in response to genotoxic insults or replication stress to maintain genome integrity. Their function is believed to depend largely on the detection of the DNA damage or defects occurring during replication fork progression.

Animals↗
PubMed2025

Regulation of replication timing in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

In order to maintain genomic integrity, DNA replication must be highly coordinated. Disruptions in this process can cause replication stress which is aberrant in many pathologies including cancer. Despite this, little is known about the mechanisms governing the temporal regulation of DNA replication initiation, thought to be related to the limited copy number of firing factors. Here, we present a high (1-kilobase) resolution stochastic model of Saccharomyces cerevisiae whole-genome replication in which origins compete to associate with limited firing factors. After developing an algorithm to fit this model to replication timing data, we validated the model by reproducing experimental inter-origin distances, origin efficiencies, and replication fork directionality. This suggests the model accurately simulates the aspects of DNA replication most important for determining its dynamics. We also use the model to predict measures of DNA replication dynamics which are yet to be determined experimentally and investigate the potential impacts of variations in firing factor concentrations on DNA replication.

Saccharomyces cerevisiae↗
PubMed2004

DNA replication defects, spontaneous DNA damage, and ATM-dependent checkpoint activation in replication protein A-deficient cells.

Replication protein A (RPA) is a heterotrimeric, single-stranded DNA-binding complex comprised of 70-kDa (RPA1), 32-kDa (RPA2), and 14-kDa (RPA3) subunits that is essential for DNA replication, recombination, and repair in eukaryotes. In addition, recent studies using vertebrate model systems have suggested an important role for RPA in the initiation of cell cycle checkpoints following exposure to DNA replication stress. Specifically, RPA has been implicated in the recruitment and activation of the ATM-Rad3-related protein kinase, ATR, which in conjunction with the related kinase, ATM (ataxia-telangiectasia-mutated), transmits checkpoint signals via the phosphorylation of downstream effectors. In this report, we have explored the effects of RPA insufficiency on DNA replication, cell survival, and ATM/ATR-dependent signal transduction in response to genotoxic stress. RNA interference-mediated suppression of RPA1 caused a slowing of S phase progression, G2/M cell cycle arrest, and apoptosis in HeLa cells. RPA-deficient cells demonstrated high levels of spontaneous DNA damage and constitutive activation of ATM, which was responsible for the terminal G2/M arrest phenotype. Surprisingly, we found that neither RPA1 nor RPA2 were essential for the hydroxyurea- or UV-induced phosphorylation of the ATR substrates CHK1 and CREB (cyclic AMP-response element-binding protein). These findings reveal that RPA is required for genomic stability and suggest that activation of ATR can occur through RPA-independent pathways.

Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated Proteins↗
PubMed2006

Tipin and Timeless form a mutually protective complex required for genotoxic stress resistance and checkpoint function.

Tipin is a mammalian protein that interacts with Timeless, which plays a role in DNA damage checkpoint responses. Here, we show that Tipin is a nuclear protein that associates with the replicative helicase and protects cells against genotoxic agents. Tipin is required for efficient cell cycle arrest in response to DNA damage, and depletion of Tipin renders cells sensitive to ionizing radiation as well as replication stress. Loss of Tipin results in spontaneous gamma-H2AX foci, a marker for DNA double-strand breaks. We find that Tipin and Timeless form a complex that maintains the level of both proteins in cells and that the loss of either one will lead to the loss of the interacting partner. This observation explains the similar checkpoint phenotypes observed in both Tipin- and Timeless-depleted cells.

Carrier Proteins↗
PubMed2003

Molecular anatomy of the DNA damage and replication checkpoints.

Cell cycle checkpoints are signal transduction pathways that enforce the orderly execution of the cell division cycle and arrest the cell cycle upon the occurrence of undesirable events, such as DNA damage, replication stress, and spindle disruption. The primary function of the cell cycle checkpoint is to ensure that the integrity of chromosomal DNA is maintained. DNA lesions and disrupted replication forks are thought to be recognized by the DNA damage checkpoint and replication checkpoint, respectively. Both checkpoints initiate protein kinase-based signal transduction cascade to activate downstream effectors that elicit cell cycle arrest, DNA repair, or apoptosis that is often dependent on dose and cell type. These actions prevent the conversion of aberrant DNA structures into inheritable mutations and minimize the survival of cells with unrepairable damage. Genetic components of the damage and replication checkpoints have been identified in yeast and humans, and a working model is beginning to emerge. We summarize recent advances in the DNA damage and replication checkpoints and discuss the essential functions of the proteins involved in the checkpoint responses.

Animals↗