Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Trait mapping”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 145 records · Page 8Linked to original sources

Extreme discordant sib pairs for mapping quantitative trait loci in humans.

Analysis of differences between siblings (sib pair analysis) is a standard method of genetic linkage analysis for mapping quantitative trait loci, such as those contributing to hypertension and obesity, in humans. In traditional designs, pairs are selected at random or with one sib having an extreme trait value. The majority of such pairs provide little power to detect linkage; only pairs that are concordant for high values, low values, or extremely discordant pairs (for example, one in the top 10 percent and the other in the bottom 10 percent of the distribution) provide substantial power. Focus on discordant pairs can reduce the amount of genotyping necessary over conventional designs by 10- to 40-fold.

Alleles↗

Mapping quantitative trait loci in complex pedigrees: a two-step variance component approach.

There is a growing need for the development of statistical techniques capable of mapping quantitative trait loci (QTL) in general outbred animal populations. Presently used variance component methods, which correctly account for the complex relationships that may exist between individuals, are challenged by the difficulties incurred through unknown marker genotypes, inbred individuals, partially or unknown marker phases, and multigenerational data. In this article, a two-step variance component approach that enables practitioners to routinely map QTL in populations with the aforementioned difficulties is explored. The performance of the QTL mapping methodology is assessed via its application to simulated data. The capacity of the technique to accurately estimate parameters is examined for a range of scenarios.

Animals↗

Mapping quantitative trait loci for carcass and meat quality traits in a wild boar x Large White intercross.

An intercross between wild boar and a domestic Large White pig population was used to map quantitative trait loci (QTL) for body proportions, weight of internal organs, carcass composition, and meat quality. The results concerning growth traits and fat deposition traits have been reported elsewhere. In the present study, all 200 F2 animals, their parents, and their grandparents were genotyped for 236 markers. The marker genotypes were used to calculate the additive and dominance coefficients at fixed positions in the genome of each F2 animal, and the trait values were regressed onto these coefficients in intervals of 1 cM. In addition, the effect of proportion of wild boar alleles was tested for each chromosome. Significant QTL effects were found for percentage lean meat and percentage lean meat plus bone in various cuts, proportion of bone in relation to lean meat in ham, muscle area, and carcass length. The significant QTL were located on chromosomes 2, 3, 4, and 8. Each QTL explained 9 to 16% of the residual variance of the traits. Gene action for most QTL was largely additive. For meat quality traits, there were no QTL that reached the significance threshold. However, the average proportion of wild boar alleles across the genome had highly significant effects on reflectance and drip loss. The results show that there are several chromosome regions with a considerable effect on carcass traits in pigs.

Animals↗

Use of quantitative trait loci to map murine lung tumor susceptibility genes.

During the last decade new methods for mapping quantitative trait loci (QTLs) have helped geneticists uncover disease-associated genes. Genetic dissection of complex multigenic diseases such as cancer is being accomplished in part by mapping QTLs in experimental crosses of mice [1]. With the recent construction of dense genetic linkage maps for the mouse, mapping of quantitative trait loci has become practical [2]. Over 6000 polymorphic simple sequence length repeat markers (microsatellite markers) have been mapped in the mouse genome [3], and new analytical approaches to linkage analysis have made QTL mapping a powerful technique for identifying cancer genes [4-7]. In this overview we discuss the design of QTL mapping studies and some of the findings from studies on the mapping of murine lung tumor susceptibility loci.

Animals↗

A review of statistical methods for expression quantitative trait loci mapping.

With high-throughput technologies now widely available, investigators can easily measure thousands of phenotypes for quantitative trait loci (QTL) mapping. Microarray measurements are particularly amenable to QTL mapping, as evidenced by a number of recent studies demonstrating utility across a broad range of biological endeavors. The early success stories have impelled a rapid increase in both the number and complexity of expression QTL (eQTL) experiments. Consequently, there is a need to consider the statistical principles involved in the design and analysis of these experiments and the methods currently being used. In this article we review these principles and methods and discuss the open questions most likely to yield significant progress toward increasing the amount of meaningful information obtained from eQTL mapping experiments.

Animals↗

Mapping quantitative trait loci for complex binary traits in outbred populations.

Complex binary traits have a dichotomous phenotypic expression but do not show a simple Mendelian segregation ratio. These traits are considered to be jointly controlled by the actions of several genes and a random environmental effect. The binary phenotype and the underlying factor are assumed to be linked through a threshold model. The underlying factor, referred to as the liability, is treated as a regular but unobservable quantitative character. Mapping quantitative trait loci (QTL) can be performed directly on the liability. Methods of QTL mapping for the liability of a complex binary trait have been well developed in line-crossing experiments. However, such a method is not available in outbred populations which usually consist of many independent pedigrees (families). In this study, we develop a method to analyse jointly multiple families of an outbred population. The method is developed based on a fixed-model approach, i.e. the QTL effects, rather than the variance, are estimated and tested. After the test, the estimated effects are then converted into a single estimate of the QTL variance by taking into consideration errors in the estimated effects. The QTL effects and variance-covariance matrix of the estimates are obtained by a fast Fisher-scoring method. Monte Carlo simulations show that the method is not only powerful but also generates very accurate estimates of QTL variances.

Algorithms↗

Mapping quantitative trait loci for complex binary diseases using line crosses.

A composite interval gene mapping procedure for complex binary disease traits is proposed in this paper. The binary trait of interest is assumed to be controlled by an underlying liability that is normally distributed. The liability is treated as a typical quantitative character and thus described by the usual quantitative genetics model. Translation from the liability into a binary (disease) phenotype is through the physiological threshold model. Logistic regression analysis is employed to estimate the effects and locations of putative quantitative trait loci (our terminology for a single quantitative trait locus is QTL while multiple loci are referred to as QTLs). Simulation studies show that properties of this mapping procedure mimic those of the composite interval mapping for normally distributed data. Potential utilization of the QTL mapping procedure for resolving alternative genetic models (e.g., single- or two-trait-locus model) is discussed.

Chromosome Mapping↗

The use of multiple markers in a Bayesian method for mapping quantitative trait loci.

Information on multiple linked genetic markers was used in a Bayesian method for the statistical mapping of quantitative trait loci (QTL). Bayesian parameter estimation and hypothesis testing were implemented via Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms. Variables sampled were the augmented data (marker-QTL genotypes, polygenic effects), an indicator variable for linkage or nonlinkage, and the parameters. The parameter vector included allele frequencies at the markers and the QTL, map distances of the markers and the QTL, QTL substitution effect, and polygenic and residual variances. The criterion for QTL detection was the marginal posterior probability of a QTL being located on the chromosome carrying the markers. The method was evaluated empirically by analyzing simulated granddaughter designs consisting of 2000 sons, 20 related sires, and their ancestors.

Algorithms↗

Quantitative trait loci mapping in dairy cattle: review and meta-analysis.

From an extensive review of public domain information on dairy cattle quantitative trait loci (QTL), we have prepared a draft online QTL map for dairy production traits. Most publications (45 out of 55 reviewed) reported QTL for the major milk production traits (milk, fat and protein yield, and fat and protein concentration (%)) and somatic cell score. Relatively few QTL studies have been reported for more complex traits such as mastitis, fertility and health. The collated QTL map shows some chromosomal regions with a high density of QTL, as well as a substantial number of QTL at single chromosomal locations. To extract the most information from these published records, a meta-analysis was conducted to obtain consensus on QTL location and allelic substitution effect of these QTL. This required modification and development of statistical methodologies. The meta-analysis indicated a number of consensus regions, the most striking being two distinct regions affecting milk yield on chromosome 6 at 49 cM and 87 cM explaining 4.2 and 3.6 percent of the genetic variance of milk yield, respectively. The first of these regions (near marker BM143) affects five separate milk production traits (protein yield, protein percent, fat yield, fat percent, as well as milk yield).

Alleles↗

Use of population isolates for mapping complex traits.

Geneticists have repeatedly turned to population isolates for mapping and cloning Mendelian disease genes. Population isolates possess many advantages in this regard. Foremost among these is the tendency for affected individuals to share ancestral haplotypes derived from a handful of founders. These haplotype signatures have guided scientists in the fine mapping of scores of rare disease genes. The past successes with Mendelian disorders using population isolates have prompted unprecedented interest among medical researchers in both the public and private sectors. Despite the obvious genetic and environmental complications, geneticists have targeted several population isolates for mapping genes for complex diseases.

Animals↗

Mapping quantitative trait loci with dominant and missing markers in various crosses from two inbred lines.

Dominant phenotype of a genetic marker provides incomplete information about the marker genotype of an individual. A consequence of using this incomplete information for mapping quantitative trait loci (QTL) is that the inference of the genotype of a putative QTL flanked by a marker with dominant phenotype will depend on the genotype or phenotype of the next marker. This dependence can be extended further until a marker genotype is fully observed. A general algorithm is derived to calculate the probability distribution of the genotype of a putative QTL at a given genomic position, conditional on all observed marker phenotypes in the region with dominant and missing marker information for an individual. The algorithm is implemented for various populations stemming from two inbred lines in the context of mapping QTL. Simulation results show that if only a proportion of markers contain missing or dominant phenotypes, QTL mapping can be almost as efficient as if there were no missing information in the data. The efficiency of the analysis, however, may decrease substantially when a very large proportion of markers contain missing or dominant phenotypes and a genetic map has to be reconstructed first on the same data as well. So it is important to combine dominant markers with codominant markers in a QTL mapping study.

Algorithms↗

Mapping complex traits in diseases of the hair and skin.

The past decade has witnessed the ascendance of human genetics in modern medicine, and at the forefront of this movement is the identification of genetic factors underlying inherited diseases. The methods of genetic mapping and positional cloning have made the discovery of genes with alleles that cause simple Mendelian diseases commonplace. The elucidation of the genetic basis of such disorders has vitalized both human genetics and the entire medical community as the field has gained prominence. The fact remains, however, that diseases resulting from the action of alleles of a single gene comprise only a minor percentage of traits that are medically relevant to humanity. The majority of these are multifactorial "complex traits", which result from the aggregate contribution of an unknown number of genes interacting with each other and with the environment. The current challenge has become one of parlaying successes in the mapping of Mendelian diseases into the discovery of genes whose alleles predispose the development of a complex disease. In light of this challenge, this review summarizes the methods and addresses some of the central issues of complex trait mapping, while using examples from dermatologically-relevant complex traits such as psoriasis and alopecia. Additionally, current technical and theoretical advances as well as the potential impact of the Human Genome Project will be discussed.

Animals↗

TDT statistics for mapping quantitative trait loci.

The original transmission disequilibrium test (TDT), was introduced to test for linkage between a marker and a disease-susceptibility locus (Spielman et al. 1993). Allison (1997) extended the TDT procedure to quantitative traits. Allison's test, however, is restrictive in that it requires family trios consisting of one heterozygous parent, one homozygous parent and one child, and considers only the situation where the marker locus is analogous to the quantitative trait locus itself. In this paper, we propose, investigate and apply a general TDT for quantitative traits that permits more than one child per family, does not require only one parent to be heterozygous, and allows for the fact that the various alleles at the marker and trait loci may be at varying degree of linkage disequilibrium. We also show that this TDT for quantitative traits is still a valid test of linkage in the presence of population substructure. To provide guidelines for study design, we develop analytic formulae for calculation of the power of the TDT for mapping quantitative trait loci and investigate the impact of various factors on the power. Power calculations show that the proposed TDT for quantitative traits is more powerful than Allison's basic test statistic and the extreme discordant sib pair linkage method. The proposed TDT statistic for quantitative traits is applied to systolic blood pressure variation in the Rochester Family Heart Study using an extremely discordant sibling pair design.

Alleles↗

Combining data from multiple inbred line crosses improves the power and resolution of quantitative trait loci mapping.

Rodent inbred line crosses are widely used to map genetic loci associated with complex traits. This approach has proven to be powerful for detecting quantitative trait loci (QTL); however, the resolution of QTL locations, typically approximately 20 cM, means that hundreds of genes are implicated as potential candidates. We describe analytical methods based on linear models to combine information available in two or more inbred line crosses. Our strategy is motivated by the hypothesis that common inbred strains of the laboratory mouse are derived from a limited ancestral gene pool and thus QTL detected in multiple crosses are likely to represent shared ancestral polymorphisms. We demonstrate that the combined-cross analysis can improve the power to detect weak QTL, can narrow support intervals for QTL regions, and can be used to separate multiple QTL that colocalize by chance. Moreover, combined-cross analysis can establish the allelic states of a QTL among a set of parental lines, thus providing critical information for narrowing QTL regions by haplotype analysis.

Cholesterol, HDL↗

Weight-adjusted genome scan analysis for mapping quantitative trait Loci for menarchal age.

CONTEXT: Twin and family studies indicate that genetic factors contribute to the variability of age at menarche (AAM), a multifactorial trait of major importance to human reproductive success. Individual variability of premenarcheal fatness is known to be an important determinant of AAM. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was mapping quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for AAM. DESIGN AND METHODS: AAM was assessed in 98 sister pairs of recent European ancestry whose growth charts were available. There was a negative correlation between menarcheal body weight sd score (SDS) and AAM (r = 0.47, P < 0.0001). We designed a genome scan approach and used the variance components model implemented in Merlin for quantitative traits to evaluate linkage of AAM and AAM adjusted for menarcheal weight SDS to 418 genome-wide microsatellites. RESULTS: Multipoint linkage analysis for AAM revealed nominal QTLs defined by LOD scores between 1.06 and 1.69 on chromosomes 1p, 1q, 7p, 8q, 16p, 19q, and 20q. The genome scan for AAM adjusted for menarcheal weight SDS revealed several QTLs with strongly suggestive LOD scores in 16q21 (LOD = 3.33), 16q12 (LOD = 3.12), and 8p12 (LOD = 2.18) and a number of other nominally significant QTLs yet viewed as hypothetical. CONCLUSIONS: We found several regions that may contain determinants of AAM, but there is still a long series of steps to confirm these QTLs and identify the genomic polymorphisms implicated in AAM variability.

Age Factors↗

[Methodology of mapping quantitative trait loci for discrete traits using maximum likelihood].

The maximum likelihood method was used to compare the efficiency of interval mapping with either the threshold model or the linear model. The irfluencing factors of quantitative trait loci (QTL) detection efficiency (e.g. QTL effect, heritability and incidence of categories) were simulated in our study. Daughter design with multiple families was applied, and the number of segregating population was 500. The results showed that the threshold model was superior in terms of parameter estimation. It was a more efficient and accurate model of QTL mapping for discrete traits. In addition, the accuracy of QTL mapping depended on the effect of the putative QTL, the value of heritability and incidence directly. With an increase of QTL effect, heritability and incidence of categories, the accuracy of QTL mapping improved correspondingly.

Algorithms↗

A comprehensive SNP-based genetic analysis of inbred mouse strains.

Dense genetic maps of mammalian genomes facilitate a variety of biological studies including the mapping of polygenic traits, positional cloning of monogenic traits, mapping of quantitative or qualitative trait loci, marker association, allelic imbalance, speed congenic construction, and evolutionary or phylogenetic comparison. In particular, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have proved useful because of their abundance and compatibility with multiple high-throughput technology platforms. SNP genotyping is especially suited for the genetic analysis of model organisms such as the mouse because biallelic markers remain fully informative when used to characterize crosses between inbred strains. Here we report the mapping and genotyping of 673 SNPs (including 519 novel SNPs) in 55 of the most commonly used mouse strains. These data have allowed us to construct a phylogenetic tree that correlates and expands known genealogical relationships and clarifies the origin of strains previously having an uncertain ancestry. All 55 inbred strains are distinguishable genetically using this SNP panel. Our data reveal an uneven SNP distribution consistent with a mosaic pattern of inheritance and provide some insight into the changing dynamics of the physical architecture of the genome. Furthermore, these data represent a valuable resource for the selection of markers and the design of experiments that require the genetic distinction of any pair of mouse inbred strains such as the generation of congenic mice, positional cloning, and the mapping of quantitative or qualitative trait loci.

Animals↗