Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Temozolomide”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 145 records · Page 8Linked to original sources
PubMed2002

A phase II study of extended low-dose temozolomide in recurrent malignant gliomas.

Temozolomide is an effective agent in the treatment of recurrent malignant gliomas. The standard dosage is 150-200 mg/m2 per day for 5 days in a 28-day cycle. A prior phase I study established a chronic daily temozolomide dose that significantly increased the total dose administered and suggested a superior response rate. In a prospective phase II trial, we treated 35 patients with recurrent malignant gliomas with temozolomide 75 mg/m2 per day for 42 consecutive days in a 70-day cycle. Median age was 55 years (range, 27-73 years) and median Karnofsky performance score was 70 (range, 60-90). Twenty-eight (79%) patients had glioblastoma multiforme, 3 (9%) anaplastic astrocytoma, 2 (6%) anaplastic oligodendroglioma, and 2 (6%) anaplastic oligoastrocytoma. All but one had prior radiotherapy, and 27 had prior chemotherapy. There were 2 partial (anaplastic astrocytoma) and 3 minor (glioblastoma multiforme) radiographic responses; 17 patients had progressive disease at the end of the first cycle. In 55 cycles of temozolomide, there were 8 episodes of asymptomatic drug-related grade 3 toxicity: 6 lymphopenia, 1 neutropenia, and 1 thrombocytopenia. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 2.5 and 8.7 months (2.3 and 7.7 months in glioblastoma multiforme patients). At 6 months, progression-free survival and overall survival rates were 27% and 67% (19% and 60% in glioblastoma multiforme). Quality of life scores did not change significantly during treatment. We conclude that the extended low-dose schedule of temozolomide is well tolerated in heavily pre-treated patients; however, our results do not support an improved rate of response or survival.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

A phase II study of temozolomide in patients with newly diagnosed supratentorial malignant glioma before radiation therapy.

Temozolomide is a novel second-generation oral alkylating agent with demonstrated efficacy and safety in patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and anaplastic astrocytoma (AA). A multicenter phase II trial was conducted to determine the efficacy and safety of temozolomide before radiotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed GBM and AA. Fifty-seven patients (51 adult, 6 pediatric) with newly diagnosed supratentorial GBM or AA were treated with temozolomide (200 mg/m ( 2 ) per day for 5 consecutive days every 28 days) for a maximum of 4 cycles. All patients were then treated with external beam radiotherapy. Twenty-two patients (39%) achieved objective response, including 6 (11%) with complete response (CR) and 16 (28%) with partial response (PR). Additionally, 18 (32%) patients had stable disease (SD). Of 21 patients (18 adult, 3 pediatric) with AA, 2 (10%) achieved CR, 5 (24%) achieved PR, and 8 (38%) had SD. Among adult patients with AA, the median progression-free and overall survival rates were 7.6 and 23.5 months, respectively. Among 36 patients (33 adult, 3 pediatric) with GBM, 4 (11%) had CR, 11 (31%) had PR, and 10 (28%) had SD. The median progression-free and overall survival rates among adult patients with GBM were 3.9 and 13.2 months, respectively. Temozolomide was safe and well tolerated in adult and pediatric patients. Grades 3 and 4 adverse events were reported in 16 (28%) and 7 (12%) patients, respectively. Temozolomide was safe and effective in treating newly diagnosed GBM and AA before radiotherapy. This pre-irradiation treatment approach appears promising, but will require additional evaluation in comparative studies.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

Alternating chemo-immunotherapy with temozolomide and low-dose interleukin-2 in patients with metastatic melanoma.

Temozolomide is a rapidly absorbed chemotherapeutic agent, achieving significant central nervous system penetration. Previous clinical trials suggested that temozolomide in sequence with low-dose recombinant human interleukin-2 might be an efficacious and relatively non-toxic chemo-immunotherapeutic treatment, which may synergistically eliminate tumours. The primary objective was to determine the safety and tolerance of temozolomide administered orally 200 mg/m days 1-5, in sequential combination with subcutaneous injections of 4.5x10 IU recombinant human interleukin-2 on days 8-11, 15-18 and 22-25 in patients with measurable, progressive metastatic malignant melanoma without radiological signs of central nervous system metastases. The secondary objectives were to determine tumour response and time to progression. Twenty-seven patients were included, of which four were non-evaluable for response. Twenty-three patients tolerated the regimen with side effects below grade 3 according to the World Health Organization (WHO) scale. Three patients suspended the treatment because of WHO grade 3 side effects already during the first 3 days of the first course of temozolomide. Seven patients showed no tumour progression during the first four treatment cycles. Two patients had complete responses, three partial responses and two stable disease at the end of the four cycles defined by the protocol and they continued the treatment until signs of relapse or a maximum of 21 courses. Five of these patients are still alive. Thrombocytopenia was significantly more pronounced in patients with objective response and stable disease than in non-responders to therapy. The median time to progression for all patients was 3.1 months and for responding and stable disease patients was 15 months. Five of 23 treated patients (22%) developed brain metastases during follow-up. Temozolomide in combination with recombinant human interleukin-2 is a well-tolerated regimen for outpatient treatment and the bio-chemotherapy combination induced durable clinical responses. Thrombocytopenia might be a positive predictive factor for response to therapy.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2006

Phase II multicentre study of temozolomide in combination with interferon alpha-2b in metastatic malignant melanoma.

OBJECTIVE: Temozolomide is a novel oral alkylating agent, active against metastatic melanoma. Combinations of chemotherapy and biological response modifiers have been associated with increased antitumour activity. A multicentre phase II study was performed to assess the activity and toxicity of temozolomide in combination with interferon alpha-2b. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had histologically confirmed metastatic melanoma. Previously untreated patients received temozolomide administered orally at a dose of 150 mg/m/day for 5 days every 4 weeks, in combination with interferon given continuously subcutaneously twice a week at a dose of 10 MU/m. Treatment continued until disease progression or for a maximum of 12 months. RESULTS: From June 1999 to August 2002, 27 eligible patients were included in the study at six centres. Median age was 59 (28-77) years; 17 male and 10 female patients were recruited; the median Karnofsky performance score was 90 (70-100); three patients had received prior adjuvant interferon; the majority of patients had fewer than three involved sites. A total of 96 cycles were administered; there were one complete response, four partial response and five stable disease (overall response rate: 18.5%, 95% confidence interval: 6.3-38.1). All responses were seen in patients with exclusively lymph node and pulmonary disease [M1a (one patient); M1b (four patients)]. The median response duration was 6.9 months. One patient remains in complete remission at 4 years. The median time to progression and the median survival were 1.87 and 9.5 months, respectively. Haematological toxicity was neutropenia G-IV: 1, G-III: 4, thrombocytopenia G-III: 2, and anaemia G-III: 2. Predominant non-haematological toxicity was hepatotoxicity G-III: 4. Other toxicities were mild or moderate. Dose reduction was required for nine cycles of interferon, one of temozolomide and two of both drugs. CONCLUSIONS: Temozolomide in combination with interferon is a well-tolerated palliative regimen that has moderate activity against metastatic melanoma. Further evaluation of this regimen in comparative studies or in combination with other drugs is warranted.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Temozolomide and interferon alpha 2b in metastatic melanoma stage IV.

BACKGROUND: A multicentre, centrally randomized, open-labelled study with temozolomide and interferon (IFN)-alpha 2b was carried out to study the therapeutic effect in patients with metastatic melanoma stage IV. OBJECTIVES: The response rate, efficacy, side-effects, reasons for discontinuation of therapy and survival rate of 47 patients treated with temozolomide in combination with two different dosing regimens of IFN-alpha 2b were documented. PATIENTS/METHODS: Twenty-nine male and 18 female patients (mean age 57.6 years, range 34-74) were centrally randomized to two different arms: 20 patients received a treatment schedule with temozolomide 150 mg m(-2) on days 1-5 orally every 28 days in combination with IFN-alpha 2b 10 MIU m(-2) every other day and 27 patients received temozolomide 150 mg m(-2) on days 1-5 every 28 days in combination with IFN-alpha 2b in a fixed dose of 10 MIU every other day. RESULTS: We observed an overall response rate of 27.6% comprising five complete remissions (10.6%: one patient group A, four patients group B), in two of these five patients at the last follow-up in the study (4.3%, both in group B); and eight partial remissions (17%: six patients in group A, two patients in group B), in three of these eight patients at the last follow-up in the study (6.4%, two patients in group A, one patient in group B). Three patients showed stable disease (6.4%: one patient in group A, two patients in group B). Mean survival was 14.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 10-19] with no significant differences between treatment groups. However, there was a significant correlation with response after three cycles (log rank test, P < 0.03). Within the 32 patients who completed at least three cycles of therapy, seven patients (three in group A and four in group B) with a partial or complete response showed a significantly better mean survival of 30.6 months (95% CI 19.1-42) compared with 25 patients who did not respond (13.7 months 95% CI 9.2-18.3). In total, patients with at least one complete remission showed the longest survival (37.1 months 95% CI 26.3-47.9), followed by patients with at least one partial response (17.4 95% CI 10.9-23.9). Major side-effects of the treatment were nausea, vomiting, headache, leucopenia, thrombopenia, elevation of liver function parameters and neurological symptoms. In five patients, the side-effects led to a discontinuation of treatment: neurological symptoms (two patients), sepsis (one patient), brain haemorrhage (one patient) and exanthema (one patient). There were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of temozolomide and IFN-alpha 2b can easily be administered and shows tolerable toxicity. When an objective response occurs after three cycles, it indicates a significant survival advantage.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Perifosine inhibits multiple signaling pathways in glial progenitors and cooperates with temozolomide to arrest cell proliferation in gliomas in vivo.

Perifosine is an oral Akt inhibitor which exerts a marked cytotoxic effect on human tumor cell lines, and is currently being tested in several phase II trials for treatment of major human cancers. However, the efficacy of perifosine in human gliomas has not been established. As Akt is activated in approximately 70% of human glioblastomas, we investigated the impact of perifosine on glia in culture and on a mouse glioma model in vivo. Here we show that perifosine strongly reduces phosphorylation levels of Akt and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (Erk) 1/2, induces cell cycle arrest in G1 and G2, and causes dose-dependent growth inhibition of mouse glial progenitors in which Akt and/or Ras-Erk 1/2 pathways are activated. Furthermore, because temozolomide is a common oral alkylating agent used in the treatment of gliomas, we investigated the effect of perifosine in combination with temozolomide. We observed an enhanced effect when both were used in culture. With these results, we combined perifosine and temozolomide as treatment of platelet-derived growth factor B-driven gliomas in mice. Animal studies showed that perifosine and temozolomide combination therapy was more effective than temozolomide treatment alone (P < 0.01). These results indicate that perifosine is an effective drug in gliomas in which Akt and Ras-Erk 1/2 pathways are frequently activated, and may be a new candidate for glioma treatment in the clinic.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Phase I trial of temozolomide and protracted irinotecan in pediatric patients with refractory solid tumors.

PURPOSE: The purpose is to estimate the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of temozolomide and irinotecan given on a protracted schedule in 28-day courses to pediatric patients with refractory solid tumors. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Twelve heavily pretreated patients received 56 courses of oral temozolomide at 100 mg/m(2)/day for 5 days combined with i.v. irinotecan given daily for 5 days for 2 consecutive weeks at either 10 mg/m(2)/day (n = 6) or 15 mg/m(2)/day (n = 6). We assessed toxicity, the pharmacokinetics of temozolomide and irinotecan, and the DNA repair phenotype in tumor samples. RESULTS: Two patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) at the higher dose level; one had grade 4 diarrhea, whereas the other had bacteremia with grade 2 neutropenia. In contrast, no patient receiving temozolomide and 10 mg/m(2)/day irinotecan experienced DLT. Myelosuppression was minimal and noncumulative. No pharmacokinetic interaction was observed. Drug metabolite exposures at the MTD were similar to exposures previously associated with single-agent antitumor activity. One complete response, two partial responses, and one minor response were observed in Ewing's sarcoma and neuroblastoma patients previously treated with stem cell transplant. Responding patients had low or absent O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase expression in tumor tissue. CONCLUSIONS: The MTD using this schedule was temozolomide (100 mg/m(2)/day) and irinotecan (10 mg/m(2)/day), with DLT being diarrhea and infection. Drug clearance was similar to single-agent values, and clinically relevant SN-38 lactone and MTIC exposures were achieved at the MTD. As predicted by xenograft models, this combination and schedule appears to be tolerable and active in pediatric solid tumors. Evaluation of a 21-day schedule is planned.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Phase I study of temozolomide in children and adolescents with recurrent solid tumors: a report from the Children's Cancer Group.

PURPOSE: The Children's Cancer Group conducted a phase I trial of temozolomide stratified by prior craniospinal irradiation (CSI). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Children and adolescents with recurrent or progressive cancer were enrolled. Temozolomide was administered orally daily for 5 days, with subsequent courses administered every 21 to 28 days after full hematologic recovery. Dose levels tested included 100, 150, 180, 215, 245, and 260 mg/m2 daily. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients on the non-CSI stratum were assessable for hematologic toxicity. During the first three dose levels (100, 150, and 180 mg/m2 daily), only grades 1 and 2 hematologic toxicity occurred. One patient at 215 mg/m2 daily had grade 3 hematologic toxicity. Three of eight patients (38%) treated at 245 to 260 mg/m2 daily had dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), which included both neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. Twenty-two patients on the CSI stratum were assessable for hematologic toxicity. Hematologic DLT occurred in one of six patients (17%) at 100 mg/m2 daily and in two of four patients (50%) at 215 mg/m2 daily. No nonhematologic DLT occurred; nausea and vomiting occurred in more than half of the patients. After two courses of temozolomide, 10 patients had stable disease (SD), and three patients had a partial response (PR), one of whom subsequently had a complete response (CR) that persists through 24 months of follow-up. CONCLUSION: The maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of temozolomide for children and adolescents without prior CSI is 215 mg/m2 daily and for those with prior CSI is 180 mg/m2 daily for 5 days, with subsequent courses that begin on day 28. Temozolomide is well tolerated and should undergo phase II testing in children and adolescents.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Safety and efficacy of temozolomide in patients with recurrent anaplastic oligodendrogliomas after standard radiotherapy and chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: Most primary oligodendrogliomas and mixed gliomas (oligoastrocytoma) respond to treatment with procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine (PCV), with response rates of approximately 80%. However, limited data on second-line treatments are available in patients with recurrent tumors. A novel second-generation alkylating agent, temozolomide, has recently demonstrated efficacy and safety in patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme and anaplastic astrocytoma. This study describes the effects of temozolomide in patients with recurrent anaplastic oligodendroglioma (AO) and anaplastic mixed oligoastrocytoma (AOA). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-eight patients with histologically confirmed AO or AOA who had received previous PCV chemotherapy were treated with temozolomide (150 to 200 mg/m2/d for 5 days per 28-day cycle). The primary end point was objective response. Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), time to progression, overall survival (OS), safety, and tolerability. RESULTS: Eight patients (16.7%) experienced a complete response, 13 patients (27.1%) experienced a partial response (objective response rate, 43.8%), and 19 patients (39.6%) experienced stable disease. For the entire treatment group, median PFS was 6.7 months and median OS was 10 months. For objective responders, median PFS was 13.1 months and median OS was 16 months. For complete responders, PFS was more than 11. 8 months and OS was more than 26 months. Response correlated with improved survival. Temozolomide was safe and well tolerated. Twelve patients developed grade 1/2 thrombocytopenia and three patients developed grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia. CONCLUSION: Temozolomide is safe and effective in the treatment of recurrent AO and AOA.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Temozolomide in combination with docetaxel in patients with advanced melanoma: a phase II study of the Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group.

PURPOSE: Temozolomide is a novel oral alkylating agent that is effective against melanoma. Moreover, temozolomide readily crosses the blood-brain barrier and may consequently be effective in patients with brain metastases. This phase II study was performed to assess the efficacy and safety of the combination regimen of temozolomide and docetaxel in patients with advanced metastatic melanoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-five patients with metastatic melanoma were enrolled. Treatment consisted of intravenous docetaxel (80 mg/m(2)) on day 1 and oral temozolomide (150 mg/m(2)) on days 1 to 5, every 4 weeks, for a maximum of six cycles. RESULTS: Sixty-two patients were eligible for the efficacy and safety analysis. Seventeen patients (27%) achieved an objective response, including five complete (8%) and 12 partial responses (19%). Median response duration was 9.5 months. Among responders, median time to progression (TTP) was 11.2 months and median overall survival (OS) was 16 months. For all treated patients, the median TTP was 4 months and median OS was 11 months. Three (38%) of eight patients who presented with brain metastases had a partial response for 5, 6, and 12 months. Of 52 patients who did not have brain involvement at presentation, only four (8%) developed brain metastases at a median follow-up of 14 months. Myelosuppression was the primary toxicity. CONCLUSION: The combination of temozolomide and docetaxel was effective and well tolerated as first-line treatment for patients with advanced metastatic melanoma and demonstrated encouraging antitumor activity against brain metastases.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2006

Phase II study of temozolomide and thalidomide in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumors.

PURPOSE: Standard, intravenous chemotherapy regimens for neuroendocrine tumors have been associated with limited response rates and significant toxicity. We evaluated the efficacy of an oral regimen of temozolomide and thalidomide in patients with metastatic carcinoid, pheochromocytoma, or pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine patients were treated with a combination of temozolomide, administered at a dose of 150 mg/m2 for 7 days, every other week, and thalidomide at doses of 50 to 400 mg daily. Patients were followed for evidence of toxicity, biochemical response, radiologic response, and survival. RESULTS: Treatment with temozolomide and thalidomide was associated with an objective biochemical (chromogranin A) response rate of 40%, and a radiologic response rate of 25% (45% among pancreatic endocrine tumors, 33% among pheochromocytomas, and 7% among carcinoid tumors). The median duration of response was 13.5 months, 1-year survival was 79%, and 2-year survival was 61%. The median administered dose of temozolomide was 150 mg/m(2), and the median administered dose of thalidomide was 100 mg daily. Grade 3-4 toxicities were uncommon, with the exception of grade 3-4 lymphopenia, which developed in 69% of the patient population. Opportunistic infections occurred in three patients (10%) during the time of lymphopenia, and included single cases of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia, disseminated varicella zoster virus, and herpes simplex virus. CONCLUSION: Orally administered temozolomide and thalidomide seems to be an active regimen for the treatment of neuroendocrine tumors. In this 29-patient study, this regimen appeared more active in pancreatic endocrine tumors than in carcinoid tumors.

Adrenal Gland Neoplasms↗
PubMed2005

Phase I trial of temozolomide plus O6-benzylguanine for patients with recurrent or progressive malignant glioma.

PURPOSE: We conducted a two-phase clinical trial in patients with progressive malignant glioma (MG). The first phase of this trial was designed to determine the dose of O6-BG effective in producing complete depletion of tumor AGT activity for 48 hours. The second phase of the trial was designed to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of a single dose of temozolomide when combined with O6-BG. In addition, plasma concentrations of O6-BG and O6-benzyl-8-oxoguanine were evaluated after O6-BG. PATIENTS AND METHODS: For our first phase of the clinical trial, patients were scheduled to undergo craniotomy for AGT determination after receiving a 1-hour O6-BG infusion at 120 mg/m2 followed by a continuous infusion at an initial dose of 30 mg/m2/d for 48 hours. The dose of the continuous infusion of O6-BG escalated until tumor AGT was depleted. Once the O6-BG dose was established a separate group of patients was enrolled in the second phase of clinical trial, in which temozolomide, administered as a single dose at the end of the 1-hour O6-BG infusion, was escalated until the MTD was determined. RESULTS: The O6-BG dose found to be effective in depleting tumor AGT activity at 48 hours was an IV bolus of 120 mg/m2 over 1 hour followed by a continuous infusion of 30 mg/m2/d for 48 hours. On enrolling 38 patients in six dose levels of temozolomide, the MTD was established at 472 mg/m2 with dose-limiting toxicities limited to myelosuppression. CONCLUSION: This study provides the foundation for a phase II trial of O6-BG plus temozolomide in temozolomide-resistant MG.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Survival following adjuvant PCV or temozolomide for anaplastic astrocytoma.

We compared survival in patients with anaplastic astrocytoma (AA) treated with adjuvant procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine (PCV) with survival in patients treated with temozolomide. A retrospective analysis was made of patients with newly diagnosed AA treated with adjuvant postradiotherapy chemotherapy. Outcome analysis included progression-free survival and overall survival. The following prognostic factors were taken into account: patient age, extent of resection, performance status, presence of contrast enhancement in presurgical imaging, and type of adjuvant treatment. Among 109 AA patients, 49 were treated with PCV and 60 with temozolomide. The treatment groups were well matched for pretreatment characteristics, except for the presence of contrast enhancement. Age, extent of surgery, performance status, and presence of contrast enhancement were statistically significant prognostic factors according to the Cox model analysis of survival. Type of adjuvant chemotherapy was not a significant factor, either for progression-free survival or for overall survival. Hematological toxicity, nonhematological toxicity grades 3-4, and premature discontinuation due to toxicity were observed in 9%, 3% to 5%, and 37%, respectively, of cases in the PCV group versus 4% to 5%, 0, and 0, respectively, in the temozolomide group. Although the present study was not randomized, it was well designed, and it reports on two homogeneous and consecutive series of patients, for whom histology was verified to obtain survival data only for patients with AA following the recent WHO 2000 classification. Even if no survival advantage has been demonstrated for temozolomide versus PCV, we conclude that temozolomide should be preferred because of its greater tolerability.

Adjuvants, Pharmaceutic↗
PubMed2004

Phase 2 study of BCNU and temozolomide for recurrent glioblastoma multiforme: North American Brain Tumor Consortium study.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the activity, measured in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) and response rates, of 1,3-bis(chloro-ethyl)-1-nitrosourea (BCNU) plus temozolomide in adult patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme. The phase 2 dose and schedule for this trial was BCNU 150 mg/m(2) i.v. followed in 2 h by temozolomide 550 mg/m(2) as a single oral dose. Treatment was repeated every 6 weeks for up to 8 cycles unless tumor progression was documented. The primary end point was PFS at 6 months (PFS-6). Response was a secondary end point, measured by MR imaging, neurological status, and steroid requirements prior to each 6-week cycle. The median age of eligible patients was 53, and 89.5% had no prior chemotherapy. All patients were evaluable for toxicity and time to progression. The PFS-6 was 21%. Overall survival was 68% at 6 months and 26% at 1 year. The MRI response for 36 patients was 2 partial responses, 2 minor responses, 19 cases of stable disease, and 13 immediate progressions. Median survival was 34 weeks, and median PFS was 11 weeks. Toxicity was primarily myelosuppression; no toxic deaths occurred. Historical phase 2 study data in this patient population show a PFS-6 of 15%. Recent data for use of temozolomide alone have shown a PFS-6 of 21%. We conclude that BCNU plus temozolomide when used in these doses and schedule has only modest activity, with significant toxicity, and appears to be no more effective than single-agent temozolomide.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Phase 1 study of erlotinib HCl alone and combined with temozolomide in patients with stable or recurrent malignant glioma.

The purpose of this study was to define the maximum tolerated dose of erlotinib and characterize its pharmaco-kinetics and safety profile, alone and with temozolomide, with and without enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs (EIAEDs), in patients with malignant gliomas. Patients with stable or progressive malignant primary glioma received erlotinib alone or combined with temozolomide in this dose-escalation study. In each treatment group, patients were stratified by coadministration of EIAEDs. Erlotinib was started at 100 mg orally once daily as a 28-day treatment cycle, with dose escalation by 50 mg/day up to 500 mg/day. Temozolomide was administered at 150 mg/m2 for five consecutive days every 28 days, with dose escalation up to 200 mg/m2 at the second cycle. Eightythree patients were evaluated. Rash, fatigue, and diarrhea were the most common adverse events and were generally mild to moderate. The recommended phase 2 dose of erlotinib is 200 mg/day for patients with glioblastoma multiforme who are not receiving an EIAED, 450 mg/day for those receiving temozolomide plus erlotinib with an EIAED, and at least 500 mg/day for those receiving erlotinib alone with an EIAED. Of the 57 patients evaluable for response, eight had a partial response (PR). Six of the 57 patients had a progression-free survival of longer than six months, including four patients with a PR. Coadministration of EIAEDs reduced exposure to erlotinib as compared with administration of erlotinib alone (33%-71% reduction). There was a modest pharmacokinetic interaction between erlotinib and temozolomide. The favorable tolerability profile and evidence of antitumor activity indicate that further investigation of erlotinib is warranted.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Surgery, radiotherapy and temozolomide in treating high-grade gliomas.

Temozolomide (TMZ) a recent, oral, second generation alkylating agent is a chemotherapeutic with demonstrated efficacy for the treatment of high-grade gliomas. The efficacy of TMZ has been demonstrated in both pre-clinical and phase I and II studies. The goal of this study is to determine the activity and safety of temozolomide in improving overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and health-related quality of life (HQL) in patient with malignant gliomas treated by surgery, radiotherapy and temozolomide. Twelve patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM), and anaplastic astrocytoma (AA) were studied. The mean follow-up period was 12 months. The overall response rate for all histological groups was 33% (4 patients), 6 patients (50%) showed a stabilization of disease. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was respectively 8.35 and 14.1 months; time to progression was 36 week ranging from 20 to 46 In all patients, treatment with temozolomide was associated with improvement of performance status including the patient showing disease progression; Karnofski score improved in all patients by a minimum of 10, with a median of 20 at 6 months. No patient stopped the treatment due to side-effects, no major adverse events were recorded. In two cases of glioblastoma, we observed complete response and after three years, the quality of life is optimal. Surgery allows to establish a histopathological diagnosis, to improve signs and symptoms which are attributable to intracranial hypertension or tumour topography, and to reduce the number of target cells for adjunctive therapies. Radiotherapy improves survival and TMZ chemotherapy that is given after radiotherapy adds survival benefit for patients. Because of its favourable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties and improved tolerability. Temozolomide appears to be an ideal, first-line, single-agent, with a safe profile and demonstrated HQL benefits in patients with high-grade gliomas.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Antitumor activity of temozolomide combined with irinotecan is partly independent of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase and mismatch repair phenotypes in xenograft models.

The activity of temozolomide combined with irinotecan (CPT-11) was evaluated against eight independent xenografts (four neuroblastomas, three rhabdomyosarcomas, and one glioblastoma). In all studies, temozolomide was administered p.o. daily for 5 consecutive days/cycle, found in preliminary studies to be the optimal schedule for administration. Irinotecan was administered i.v. for 5 days for 2 consecutive weeks/cycle. Treatment cycles were repeated every 21 days for a total of three cycles over 8 weeks. In combination, temozolomide and CPT-11 induced complete responses in four neuroblastomas, two rhabdomyosarcomas, and the glioblastoma line. The activity of the combination was significantly greater than the activity of either agent administered alone in four tumor lines. Of interest, the interaction appeared independent of tumor MGMT or mismatch repair phenotype, suggesting that the mechanism of synergy may be independent of O6-methylation by temozolomide. Pharmacokinetic studies indicated no detectable interaction between these two agents. Further, coadministration of CPT-11 appeared to reduce the toxicity of temozolomide in tumor-bearing mice.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2000

Schedule-dependent activity of temozolomide plus CPT-11 against a human central nervous system tumor-derived xenograft.

Temozolomide, an imidazole tetrazinone, and CPT-11, a camptothecin derivative, have previously been shown to have anti-central nervous system tumor activity in laboratory and clinical studies. The current experiments were designed to evaluate the activity of temozolomide plus CPT-11 against a malignant glioma-derived xenograft, D-54 MG, growing s.c. in athymic nude mice. The initial schedule of i.p. drug administration was temozolomide at 0.1 LD10 on day 1 and CPT-11 at 0.1 LD10 on days 1-5 and 8-14. The combination of these two agents produced greater than additive activity against D-54 MG. This enhanced activity was maintained when the initial administration of CPT-11 was delayed to day 3 or day 5. However, when CPT-11 was administered first on day 1 using 0.5 LD10 (for the single dose schedule) followed by temozolomide (0.1 LD10) 5 h, 3 days, or 5 days later, the enhancement of activity was substantially reduced. These results demonstrate that the combination of temozolomide plus CPT-11 displays a schedule-dependent enhancement of antitumor activity, suggest a mechanistic explanation for the enhanced activity, and provide the rationale for a Phase I trial of this regimen.

Animals↗