Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Sigmoidoscopy”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 145 records · Page 8Linked to original sources
PubMed1999

Depth of insertion at flexible sigmoidoscopy: implications for colorectal cancer screening and instrument design.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: The depth of insertion at flexible sigmoidoscopy is variable, depending upon bowel preparation, patient tolerance and distal colonic anatomy. Many endoscopists routinely aim to insert the 60 cm flexible sigmoidoscope to the splenic flexure; however internal endoscopic markers are unreliable, making the true anatomical extent of the examination difficult to assess. The aim of this study was to assess the depth of insertion at flexible sigmoidoscopy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two separate studies were done. In the first (study 1), magnetic endoscopic imaging was used to determine the final depth of insertion at non-sedated, screening flexible sigmoidoscopy. In the second (study 2), "real-time" imaging was utilized to determine sigmoid looping and the anatomical location of the endoscope tip after 60 cm of instrument had been inserted during total or limited colonoscopy. A total of 117 consecutive average-risk patients, aged 55-65 years participated in study 1, and 136 patients underwent either limited, (33) or attempted total colonoscopy (103) in study 2. RESULTS: In study 1 the median insertion distance was 52 cm, range 20-58. In 61 % of patients the imaging system showed that the descending colon had not been visualized by the end of the procedure. Failure to reach the sigmoid/descending junction occurred in 29 (24%) patients. Reasons for failure included poor tolerance of the procedure due to pain (23 patients) inadequate preparation (3 patients) and, excessive looping (3 patients). In study 2, after 60 cm of instrument had been inserted, the splenic flexure or beyond was reached in 29% and the descending colon in 9%, whilst in 62 % the endoscope tip had not passed beyond the sigmoid/descending colon junction. A sigmoid loop formed in 70% of patients, and unusual loops such as the alpha, reverse alpha and reverse sigmoid spiral loop occurred more frequently in women compared to men (P = 0.0249). In those 104 patients where the splenic flexure was reached the mean maximum length of instrument inserted prior to reaching the flexure was 75.4 cm, (SD = 21.9). CONCLUSIONS: Examination of the entire sigmoid was not achieved in approximately one-quarter of patients undergoing screening flexible sigmoidoscopy, mainly because of discomfort. The descending colon is intubated in a minority of cases (using standard instruments), even after 60 cm has been inserted. Alternative instruments with different shaft characteristics (floppy, narrow calibre, 80-100 cm in length) may be necessary to ensure deeper routine intubation in nonsedated patients.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Judgement of the quality of bowel preparation at screening flexible sigmoidoscopy is associated with variability in adenoma detection rates.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Adenoma detection rates (ADRs) at screening flexible sigmoidoscopy are known to vary between endoscopists. Variability in the technique used and in the quality of bowel preparation may explain this. The aim of this study was to establish whether there is a relationship between the grading of bowel preparation and the ADR. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The relationship between the ADR and assessment of bowel preparation was examined using the full United Kingdom Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Screening Trial data set (n = 38 601). The consistency of the bowel preparation classification was then investigated by six experienced endoscopists (video scorers), who examined 260 flexible sigmoidoscopy cases - 20 from each of the 13 trial endoscopists. RESULTS: Overall, the ADR was significantly higher in flexible sigmoidoscopy examinations with excellent or good bowel preparation ( P = 0.02). However, endoscopists with a higher ADR coded a smaller proportion of their examinations as having excellent/good preparation ( P = 0.002). Video scorers agreed with the trial endoscopists' definition of bowel preparation in 48.9 % of the readings, but they scored the quality of preparation as poorer than the trial endoscopists in 36.4 % and 40.6 %, respectively, in the intermediate-performance group (10 % < ADR < 14 %) and lower-performance group (ADR </= 10 %) in comparison with only 12.9 % in the high-performance group (ADR > or =14 %). There was a significant linear trend between the proportion scored as having poor bowel preparation and the ADR ( P < 0.001), varying from 2.7 % in the higher-performance ADR group to 13.4 % in the lower-performance group. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopists with a higher ADR are more likely to be critical of the quality of bowel preparation. Training in judgement processes such as non-acceptance of suboptimal bowel preparation is required in order to ensure universally high standards in screening procedures.

Adenoma↗
PubMed1997

Importance of adenomas 5 mm or less in diameter that are detected by sigmoidoscopy.

BACKGROUND: The need for colonoscopy in patients with adenomas 5 mm or less in diameter that are detected by sigmoidoscopy is controversial. METHODS: We prospectively determined the prevalence of proximal colonic neoplasms in asymptomatic patients at average risk for colorectal cancer, each of whose index lesion on screening fiberoptic sigmoidoscopy was a benign adenoma. Polyps found on sigmoidoscopy underwent biopsy, and colonoscopy was recommended to all patients with neoplastic polyps. Rectosigmoid adenomas were classified as diminutive (< or = 5 mm in diameter), small (6 to 10 mm in diameter), or large (> or = 11 mm in diameter). RESULTS: Of 3496 consecutive patients referred for sigmoidoscopy, 311 had neoplastic rectosigmoid polyps; 108 of these patients were excluded from the analysis because of a history of colonic neoplasia, symptoms, prior colonic evaluation, or incomplete follow-up data. The remaining 203 patients made up the study group, and all underwent colonoscopy. Neoplasms were found in the proximal colon in 40 of 137 patients (29 percent) with diminutive index polyps, 15 of 52 patients (29 percent) with small index polyps, and 8 of 14 patients (57 percent) with large index polyps. Advanced neoplasms (adenomas > or = 10 mm in diameter, adenomas with a villous component or moderate-to-severe dysplasia, carcinoma in situ, or frank carcinoma) were found in 8 patients (6 percent), 5 patients (10 percent), and 4 patients (29 percent), respectively. Two patients with diminutive index polyps had proximal carcinoma in situ, and two had proximal stage I carcinomas; one patient with a large index polyp had proximal stage III carcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: The substantial prevalence of proximal colonic neoplasms, including advanced lesions, in asymptomatic average-risk patients with rectosigmoid adenomas < or = 5 mm in diameter warrants colonoscopy in these patients.

Adenoma↗
PubMed2000

Prospective, randomized, single-blind comparison of two preparations for screening flexible sigmoidoscopy.

BACKGROUND: The best and most cost-effective bowel cleansing regimen for patients undergoing flexible sigmoidoscopy is not known. The aim of this study was to compare patient tolerance, quality of preparation, and cost of 2 bowel cleansing regimens for flexible sigmoidoscopy. METHODS: Two hundred fifty consecutive patients referred for screening flexible sigmoidoscopy were randomized to receive an oral preparation (45 mL oral sodium phosphate and 10 mg bisacodyl) or an enema preparation (2 Fleet enemas and 10 mg bisacodyl). Tolerance of the preparation was graded as easy, tolerable, slightly difficult, extremely difficult, or intolerable. The endoscopist was blinded to which preparation the patient received and graded the quality of the preparation as poor, fair, good, or excellent. Cost was calculated by adding the cost of the medications and the cost for the nursing time required to prepare the patient for endoscopy. RESULTS: Patients in the oral preparation group were more likely to grade the preparation as easy or tolerable when compared with the enema group (96.8% vs. 56.4%, p < 0.001). The endoscopist graded the quality of the preparation as good or excellent in 86.5% of the patients in the oral preparation group compared with 57.3% in the enema group (p < 0.001). In the oral preparation group, the mean nursing time (34.6 vs. 65.3 minutes, p < 0.001) and cost ($16.39 vs. $31.13, p < 0.001) were significantly less than in the enema group. CONCLUSIONS: An oral sodium phosphate preparation results in a superior quality endoscopic examination that is better tolerated and more cost-effective than enemas in patients undergoing screening flexible sigmoidoscopy.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2003

Inter-endoscopist variation in polyp and neoplasia pick-up rates in flexible sigmoidoscopy screening for colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: The Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Prevention study is an ongoing flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) screening trial for colorectal cancer. Twenty-one thousand average-risk individuals, aged 50-64 years, living in two separate areas in Norway were randomly drawn from the Population Registry and invited to once-only screening flexible sigmoidoscopy. Examinations were performed over 3 years, at 2 centres, by 8 different endoscopists, using the same type of equipment. The aim of the present study was to investigate possible differences between endoscopists in detecting individuals with polyps, adenomas and advanced lesions (adenomas with severe dysplasia and/or villous components and/or size larger than 9 mm and carcinoma) in flexible sigmoidoscopy screening. METHODS: The present trial comprises data from 8822 individuals, aged 55-64 years, who have undergone a flexible sigmoidoscopy. In the study period, all lesions detected by the different endoscopists were registered. Tissue samples were taken from all lesions detected. RESULTS: Detection rates varied significantly between endoscopists, ranging from 36.4% to 65.5% for individuals with any polyp, from 12.7% to 21.2% for any adenoma and from 2.9% to 5.0% for advanced lesions. In a multiple logistic regression model, the performing endoscopist was a strong independent predictor for detection of individuals with polyps (P < 0.001 ), adenomas (P < 0.001) and advanced lesions (P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Detection rates for colorectal lesions vary significantly between endoscopists in colorectal cancer screening. Establishing systems for monitoring performance in screening programmes is important. Supervised training and re-certification for endoscopists with poor performance should be considered.

Clinical Competence↗
PubMed1995

Low-cost flexible sigmoidoscopy screening: a community demonstration and education project.

The purpose of this project was to demonstrate that a low-cost, community-based screening and education approach (for both patients and physicians), as has been used with mammography, can be successful with flexible sigmoidoscopy. One hundred appointments over four days were made available via a targeted mailing to 12,000 health-interested community members if they were asymptomatic, 50 years old or older, and had never before been screened by flexible sigmoidoscopy. The cost for the procedure was set at $50. Professional education was accomplished by having local physicians interested in gaining greater experience with flexible sigmoidoscopy provide the screenings under supervision. All 100 patient appointments and seven physician-training slots were quickly filled. Ninety-five procedures were performed by seven local physicians, averaging 10 minutes per procedure, with an average insertion depth of 31 cm and a 4.2% premalignant-polyp detection rate. The patients were also given education and counseling about colorectal cancer screening and prevention, and were evaluated by pre- and post-testing, and satisfaction questionnaires. The patients demonstrated markedly significant knowledge gains about colorectal cancer prevention and early detection, with 99% agreeable to having the procedure repeated in the future. This project demonstrated a high level of both public and professional willingness to participate in a flexible sigmoidoscopy screening program. The project method is presented in detail to encourage future such programs.

Aged↗
PubMed1983

Sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy, and radiology in the evaluation of children with rectal bleeding.

The authors evaluated the diagnostic role of sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy, and double contrast radiology in 103 children with rectal bleeding, with or without other gastrointestinal symptoms. The children's mean age was 44 months, with a range from 1 month to 12 years. In 74.5% of the subjects investigated, visual inspection of the anus and sigmoidoscopy with rectal biopsy disclosed a positive diagnosis. Of the remaining patients, a conclusive diagnosis was reached by either colonoscopy or double contrast radiology in all but six patients. These six, with mild painless hematochezia, remained without a diagnosis. The diagnostic procedure in pediatric patients with rectal bleeding should include an initial visual inspection of the anus, and sigmoidoscopy; air contrast enema and colonoscopy should be performed only in children whose sigmoidoscopy is negative, in diagnostic assessment of inflammatory bowel disease, and in cases of recurrent bleeding after removal of rectal polyps. Colonoscopy is important also in the follow-up examination of children with inflammatory bowel disease and allows the removal of polyps located in the proximal colon.

Barium Sulfate↗
PubMed1992

Adherence to screening flexible sigmoidoscopy in asymptomatic patients.

The purpose of this study was to assess patient adherence to physician-recommended screening flexible sigmoidoscopy. In the setting of a family practice residency program, adherence rates in asymptomatic patients (N = 333, age > or = 50 years) were compared among a Usual Care Group; an Intervention Group that received educational materials and a phone reminder; and a Continuity Group, which had longstanding continuity with a single physician. Data from mailed questionnaires (N = 180) were used to examine the associations of demographic factors and attitudes with adherence. Adherence was 30.3% overall, with a nonsignificant increase in the Intervention Group compared with the Usual Care Group. In a pooled analysis of the Usual Care and Continuity Groups, the half of the sample with the highest continuity had a significantly higher adherence rate than the rest of the sample (45%; P < 0.001). In a discriminant analysis (78% correct classification, P < 0.001) two history variables (family history of cancer; family history of colon problems), one measure of continuity (number of physician visits), one demographic variable (lower household income), and two attitudinal factors (perception of how painful flexible sigmoidoscopy would be; perception of how well the physician explained its importance) made statistically significant contributions to the prediction of adherence. Results of the study show that screening flexible sigmoidoscopy is acceptable to asymptomatic patients, and that continuity is likely to have a positive impact on adherence. Because attitudes offer the potential for modification, we suggest that physicians reassure patients that flexible sigmoidoscopy is not unduly painful and discuss with patients individually its importance to their health.

Aged↗
PubMed2001

Open-access versus hospital-initiated flexible sigmoidoscopy: a comparative audit of efficacy.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: There is a continuing demand for the provision of open-access endoscopy services. While open-access gastroscopy is now a well-established practice in most hospitals, open-access flexible sigmoidoscopy (OAS) is not yet available to the same extent. We present our early experience with OAS, a new service provided by our unit. PATIENTS, METHODS AND RESULTS: Over a 12-month period, 255 flexible sigmoidoscopies were carried out (139 OAS and 116 hospital-initiated sigmoidoscopies, HIS). Referral criteria for sigmoidoscopy were similar in both groups, with rectal bleeding and change in bowel habit being the most frequent. RESULTS: The two groups were comparable with regards to age and gender, but patients referred for OAS had symptoms for shorter duration than those referred for HIS (30 +/- 5.6 months v. 101 +/- 28 months, P < 0.00001). The diagnostic yield for OAS was 44% and for HIS 29% (P= 0.01). Significant pathology (colorectal cancer, polyps and newly diagnosed inflammatory bowel disease, colonic strictures) was detected in 31 patients (22%) in the OAS group and 12 patients (10%) in the HIS group (P = 0.02). Six cancers were diagnosed (5 OAS, 1 HIS), all staged Duke A. The waiting times for OAS and HIS were 3.1 +/- 0.3 weeks and 11.4 +/- 1.2 weeks, respectively (P = 0.0001). The diagnostic yield of fibre-optic endoscopy was independent of duration of symptoms, although patients referred for OAS with rectal bleeding and/or diarrhoea had a higher diagnostic yield (55/125, 44%). CONCLUSION: OAS is feasible and effective, with a high diagnostic yield. Such service can usually be provided with minimal added resources.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Endoscopic evaluation of chronic human immunodeficiency virus-related diarrhea: is colonoscopy superior to flexible sigmoidoscopy?

OBJECTIVES: In patients with chronic human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-related diarrhea undergoing lower endoscopy, the decision to perform flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy is controversial. The purpose of this study is twofold: 1) to evaluate the diagnostic yield of colonoscopy in a large group of patients with chronic HIV-related diarrhea and negative stool studies, and 2) to determine whether colonoscopy is superior to flexible sigmoidoscopy in this setting. METHODS: All HIV-infected patients with chronic diarrhea who were referred for diagnostic colonoscopy at Bellevue Hospital Center between January 1992 and December 1996 were identified. Patient charts, pathology reports, and endoscopy records were reviewed. RESULTS: During the 5-yr study period, 317 consecutive patients with chronic unexplained diarrhea undergoing colonoscopy were identified. A potential cause of diarrhea was found in 116 patients (36.6%). Cytomegalovirus was the most common pathogen detected (24%). The yield of colonoscopy was significantly higher in patients with a CD4 count of <100 cells/mm3 than in those with higher CD4 counts (44.8% vs 6.4%, p < 0.0001). Thirty percent of pathogens and 75% of lymphomas were identified only on biopsies taken from the proximal colon, well beyond the reach of the flexible sigmoidoscope. Importantly, 94% of the pathogens that were found only in the proximal colon were organisms for which effective therapy is currently available. CONCLUSIONS: Colonoscopy is superior to flexible sigmoidoscopy in HIV-infected patients with chronic unexplained diarrhea. If flexible sigmoidoscopy had been performed instead of colonoscopy, 30% of pathogens would have been missed and 75% of lymphomas would have escaped detection.

AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections↗
PubMed1981

An evaluation of flexible fibreoptic sigmoidoscopy.

Results of 350 flexible fibreoptic sigmoidoscopy examinations showed a diagnostic yield of 30% compared with 6.5% by rigid sigmoidoscopy of the same patients. The mean time for the examinations was eight minutes, a distance of over 50 cm being visualised in 65% of the patients. Preparation of the bowel with a single phosphate enema was adequate in 95% of the patients. As an outpatient investigation for clinicians fibreoptic sigmoidoscopy is a safe, quick, and useful addition to rigid sigmoidoscopy and should result in a decrease in the number of barium enema examinations required.

Adenoma↗
PubMed1998

A UK training programme for nurse practitioner flexible sigmoidoscopy and a prospective evaluation of the practice of the first UK trained nurse flexible sigmoidoscopist.

BACKGROUND: Flexible sigmoidoscopy is a technical skill that has been successfully performed by suitably trained colorectal nurse practitioners in the USA. However, no recognised training course exists for nurse practitioners in the UK. AIMS: To design and evaluate a training programme for nurse endoscopists. METHODS: A multidisciplinary committee of nurses and clinicians developed a structured programme of study and practice. This involved a staged process of observations, withdrawals, and ultimately, full procedures. Once training had been completed the nurse practitioner was permitted to practice independently. Patients with colorectal symptoms referred for flexible sigmoidoscopy were examined for the final stages of training and independent practice. A prospective evaluation of the training and practice of the first trained nurse flexible sigmoidoscopist was performed. Barium enema, video, clinical follow up, and histology were used to validate the results of the flexible sigmoidoscopies. RESULTS: The training programme required that 35 observations, 35 withdrawals, and 35 supervised full procedures were performed prior to the development of independent practice. Subsequent to the completion of this programme 215 patients have been examined independently by the nurse practitioner. Ninety three per cent of the examinations were judged successful and pathology was identified in 51%. The nurse endoscopist successfully identified all "significant" pathology whereas barium enema failed to identify pathology in 12.5%. There were no complications. CONCLUSION: With suitable training nurse endoscopists are able to perform flexible sigmoidoscopy safely and effectively.

Clinical Competence↗
PubMed1995

Acceptance of screening for colorectal cancer by flexible sigmoidoscopy.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the acceptance rate of screening by flexible sigmoidoscopy in a sample of general practice patients aged 50 to 60, and the acceptability of the procedure among those undergoing the test. SETTING: Recruitment took place in selected general practices in Melbourne, Australia. Flexible sigmoidoscopies were performed at the local public hospital. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 187 patients aged between 50 and 60, and without bowel symptoms, were seen by one of 12 non-randomly selected general practitioners during the study period. At the conclusion of routine consultation general practitioners discussed colorectal screening with eligible patients and recommended that they attend a free screening clinic at the local hospital. The patients who attended the clinic underwent flexible sigmoidoscopy performed by experienced endoscopists. Clinic attenders completed a questionnaire which measured perceptions of the screening visit. RESULTS: The attendance rate was 49%. All clinic attenders were satisfied with the care received at clinic. Sixty five per cent of people experienced either no discomfort or mild discomfort, while 15% of people experienced moderate or severe pain. A bloated feeling was common (80%), with around 36% of people experiencing moderate or extreme bloating. Most people said that they were not at all embarrassed (64%), though 9% reported moderate or extreme embarrassment. Seventeen people (19%) were found to have polyps. CONCLUSIONS: Although the procedure was acceptable to those who underwent the screening test, further research on effective recruitment strategies is required if a full scale flexible sigmoidoscopy screening programme is to be considered feasible.

Age Factors↗
PubMed2003

Acceptance by patients of multidetector CT colonography compared with barium enema examinations, flexible sigmoidoscopy, and colonoscopy.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare patient acceptance of multidetector CT colonography, total colonoscopy, flexible sigmoidoscopy, and double-contrast barium enema to ascertain any overall preference. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. One hundred sixty-eight patients underwent CT colonography followed by either flexible sigmoidoscopy (n = 59) or colonoscopy (n = 109). A 25-point questionnaire with principal components relating to satisfaction, worry, and physical discomfort was administered after CT colonography and after endoscopy, and a follow-up questionnaire was administered 1 week after the procedures. Questionnaires were also completed by 140 patients undergoing double-contrast barium enema examinations. Responses were compared using Wilcoxon's matched pairs test and the Mann-Whitney test. RESULTS: Overall satisfaction was greater with colonoscopy (p = 0.01), but CT colonography caused less discomfort (p = 0.002), was better tolerated (p = 0.005), and was the preferred follow-up investigation of those expressing a preference (p = 0.003). Compared with flexible sigmoidoscopy, CT colonography caused less pain (p = 0.004), was more acceptable (p = 0.04), and was preferred as the follow-up investigation (p < 0.001). Tolerance of colonoscopy was significantly less in women (p = 0.03), but such was not the case for CT colonography (p = 0.58). Patients undergoing CT colonography were less worried (p < 0.001), were more satisfied (p = 0.001), and suffered less discomfort (p < 0.001) than those having barium enema. CONCLUSION: Patients' experiences with barium enema examinations were significantly worse than with any other test. Although patients were most satisfied with colonoscopy, they reported more pain during both colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy than during CT colonography, and they also found CT more acceptable. In patients expressing a preference, CT colonography was the preferred follow-up investigation.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Multicenter evaluation of training of non-endoscopists in 30-cm flexible sigmoidoscopy.

An estimated 145,000 patients will be diagnosed with colorectal cancer in the United States in 1987. Although half of these cancers are potentially detectable by sigmoidoscopy, rigid sigmoidoscopy is not widely used for early detection, largely because of discomfort it causes patients. Flexible sigmoidoscopy has been shown to be more acceptable and more efficient in detecting cancers. In order for flexible sigmoidoscopy to be of more value in cancer control, however, primary care physicians must learn the technique and incorporate it into their complete physical examinations. This paper reports the results of a multicenter trial that evaluated the training required for non-endoscopists to learn how to use the 30-cm flexible sigmoidoscope. Instructions with plastic models, followed by an average of six supervised patient examinations, proved sufficient for them to learn the necessary skills.

Colonic Neoplasms↗
PubMed2000

Flexible sigmoidoscopy screening for colorectal cancer in average-risk people: update of a community-based project.

OBJECTIVES: To analyse results of a screening program for colorectal cancer using flexible sigmoidoscopy. DESIGN: Survey of results of screening program and follow-up colonoscopies and identification of missed cases from State cancer registry data. PARTICIPANTS: Asymptomatic, average-risk people aged 55-64 years who were either mailed invitations after random selection from the electoral roll or volunteered after hearing about the program. SETTING: Fremantle Hospital, Western Australia (a public teaching hospital), July 1995 to November 1999 (first 4.5 years of the screening program). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Participation rates; lesions detected; stage of colorectal cancers diagnosed at the hospital before and after the screening program began (1989-1995 versus 1996-1999); and diagnoses of colorectal cancer in previously screened individuals (from State cancer registry data). RESULTS: 6446 people were mailed invitations, and 1483 were screened (23% participation rate). Another 1122 people volunteered, giving 2605 people screened overall. Flexible sigmoidoscopy showed adenomatous polyps in 352 people (14%), and colonoscopy was recommended in 399 (15%) on the basis of clinically suspicious lesions. Colonoscopy was performed in 302 (76% participation rate). Screening and follow-up colonoscopy detected 14 colorectal cancers (10 invasive, with eight of these Dukes stage A). One participant was diagnosed with colorectal cancer 12 months after sigmoidoscopy gave normal results. Incidence of colorectal cancer was 119 per 100000 per year, and prevalence was 0.5%. Before the screening program, 12% of cancers diagnosed at our hospital were Dukes stage A, compared with 28% after (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Flexible sigmoidoscopy screening is an acceptable strategy in asymptomatic, average-risk people which detects colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps. Screening has been associated with a trend to earlier presentation of cancer in our institution.

Aged↗
PubMed1988

Small polyps found during fiberoptic sigmoidoscopy in asymptomatic patients.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of small polyps in the rectosigmoid in an asymptomatic group and the likelihood of finding synchronous neoplastic polyps proximally at colonoscopy. DESIGN: Asymptomatic patients with polyps 9 mm or less found at screening fiberoptic sigmoidoscopy were referred for colonoscopy, at which time all polyps were removed. SETTING: Screening fiberoptic sigmoidoscopy unit. PATIENTS: Referral from Executive Health Wellness Clinic and large multispeciality clinic. RESULTS: From 3923 sigmoidoscopic examinations, 258 asymptomatic subjects (7%) were identified who had polyps 9 mm or smaller. One hundred and eighty-nine patients (73%) had colonoscopy. In 179 patients, the target lesion noted at sigmoidoscopy was identified at colonoscopy. Based on histology of the target lesion, patients were divided into three groups: Group 1 (72 patients) had only hyperplastic polyps; Group 2 (69 patients) had at least one neoplastic polyp; and Group 3 (31 patients) had polyps with normal histology. Seven patients were not classified. Neoplastic polyps were found proximally in 21 patients in Group 1 (29%; 95% CI, 19 to 39), 23 patients in Group 2 (33%; 95% CI, 22 to 44), and 4 patients in Group 3 (13%; 95% CI, 4 to 30). There was no difference in mean age between groups. The results were similar when only polyps 5 mm or smaller were analyzed. CONCLUSION: Because small polyps of any histologic type in the rectosigmoid indicate a high risk for having neoplastic polyps proximally, the guidelines of both the American College of Physicians and the American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy may need to be revised. Colonoscopy seems justified in any patient in whom a small polyp is discovered at sigmoidoscopy.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Bowel preparation for flexible sigmoidoscopy: which method yields the best results?

BACKGROUND: Bowel preparation is a significant aspect of the flexible sigmoidoscopy procedure. Clear visibility of the bowel mucosa is critical for a thorough examination. The combination of a light breakfast in the morning and the application of 2 phosphate enemas a few hours before the examination is a safe and commonly used method of preparing a patient for a flexible sigmoidoscopy procedure. However, there is a paucity of objective data on the efficacy of this method of bowel preparation. It has been practiced on the basis of intuition and clinical experience. METHODS: In this prospective single-blinded randomized study, 429 consecutive patients were assigned to receive 1 of 4 different bowel preparations before elective 60-cm flexible sigmoidoscopy. After completion of the procedure, the examiner gave a subjective rating of the quality of the preparation. The rating was determined on the basis of the percentage of bowel mucosa that was visible. RESULTS: Statistical analysis of results suggests no significant difference in frequency of favorable ratings between the 4 bowel preparations. CONCLUSIONS: This study substantiates the practice of having a light breakfast and 2 phosphate enemas as a method of bowel preparation for a flexible sigmoidoscopy procedure. Additional preparatory measures such as dietary restrictions and ingestion of phospho-soda oral saline laxative did not significantly enhance the quality of the examination.

Cathartics↗