Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Sigma Factor”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 145 records · Page 8Linked to original sources
PubMed2001

The importance of zinc-binding to the function of Rhodobacter sphaeroides ChrR as an anti-sigma factor.

The Rhodobacter sphaeroides extra cytoplasmic function sigma factor, sigma(E), directs transcription of promoters for the cycA gene (cycA P3) and the rpoEchrR operon (rpoE P1). These genes encode the periplasmic electron carrier cytochrome c(2) and sigma(E)/ChrR, respectively. Using in vitro transcription assays with purified R. sphaeroides core RNA polymerase and sigma(E), we show that ChrR is sufficient to inhibit sigma(E)-dependent transcription. Inhibition is proposed to proceed through a binding interaction, since sigma(E) and ChrR form a 1:1 complex that can be purified when expressed at high levels in Escherichia coli. Active preparations of ChrR and the sigma(E)/ChrR complex each contain stoichiometric zinc. Removal of zinc from ChrR or a single amino acid substitution that abolishes zinc binding, results in a protein that is incapable of inhibiting sigma(E) activity or forming a complex with the sigma factor, indicating that metal binding is important to ChrR activity. Treatment of ChrR with the thiol-modifying reagent p-hydroxymecuriphenylsulfonic acid results in the release of about one mole of zinc per mole of protein. Furthermore, two N-terminal cysteine residues are protected from reaction with the thiol-specific reagent dithionitrobenzoic acid until zinc is removed, suggesting that these residues may be involved in zinc binding. These data indicate that ChrR is a specific anti-sigma factor of sigma(E) that requires zinc for function. Based on amino acid sequence similarity, we propose that ChrR is part of a family of similar anti-sigma factors that are found in alpha and gamma proteobacteria.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1994

Overproducing the Bacillus subtilis mother cell sigma factor precursor, Pro-sigma K, uncouples sigma K-dependent gene expression from dependence on intercompartmental communication.

During sporulation of Bacillus subtilis, proteolytic activation of pro-sigma K and ensuing sigma K-dependent gene expression normally require the activity of many sporulation gene products. We report here that overproducing pro-sigma K at the onset of sporulation substantially uncouples sigma K-dependent gene expression from its normal dependency. Overproducing pro-sigma K in strains with a mutation in spoIIIG, spoIIIA, spoIIIE, or spoIVB partially restored sigma K-dependent gene expression in the mother cell and resulted in accumulation of a small amount of polypeptide that comigrated with sigma K, but these mutants still failed to form spores. In contrast, sporulation of spoIVF mutants was greatly enhanced by pro-sigma K overproduction. The products of the spoIVF operon are made in the mother cell and normally govern pro-sigma K processing, but overproduction of pro-sigma K appears to allow accumulation of a small amount of sigma K, which is sufficient to partially restore mother cell gene expression and spore formation. This spoIVF-independent mechanism for processing pro-sigma K depends on sigma E, an earlier-acting mother cell-specific sigma factor. The spoIIID gene, which encodes a mother cell-specific DNA-binding protein that is normally required for pro-sigma K production, was shown to be required for efficient pro-sigma K processing as well. bof (bypass of forespore) mutations bypassed this requirement for spoIIID, suggesting that SpoIIID is less directly involved in pro-sigma K processing than are spoIVF gene products. However, bof spoIIID double mutants overproducing pro-sigma K still failed to sporulate, indicating that SpoIIID serves another essential role(s) in sporulation in addition to its multiple roles in the production of sigma K.

Bacillus subtilis↗
PubMed1996

Sigma factor-anti-sigma factor interaction in alginate synthesis: inhibition of AlgT by MucA.

Conversion from the nonmucoid to the mucoid phenotype is a typical feature of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains causing chronic pulmonary infections in cystic fibrosis patients. One of the key genetic controls in this conversion to mucoidy is from the algT(U)-mucA-mucB(algN) locus, located at 67.5 min on the standard P. aeruginosa chromosomal map. The algT gene promotes conversion to mucoidy and encodes an alternative sigma factor (sigma E) which belongs to the ECF (for extracytoplasmic function) family. On the other hand, the mucA and mucB (algN) genes suppress conversion to mucoidy. Loss-of-function mutations in mucA have been postulated to be the cause of mucoidy in some P. aeruginosa strains isolated from cystic fibrosis patients. We expressed and purified the protein products from the mucA and mucB open reading frames. The purified MucA protein abolishes the in vitro transcription specified by AlgT and the ability of AlgT to compete with an Escherichia coli sigma factor, FliA, suggesting that inhibiting AlgT-dependent transcription could be the mechanism by which mucA suppresses mucoidy in vivo. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and glycerol density gradient sedimentation experiments suggest that MucA physically interacts with AlgT.

Bacterial Proteins↗
PubMed1995

Site of phosphorylation of SpoIIAA, the anti-anti-sigma factor for sporulation-specific sigma F of Bacillus subtilis.

Sigma F is regulated by an anti-sigma factor, SpoIIAB, and an anti-anti-sigma factor, SpoIIAA. SpoIIAB also functions as a phosphokinase which transfers phosphate from ATP to SpoIIAA; this phosphorylation is thought to be involved in the regulatory mechanism. By using [gamma-32P]ATP to phosphorylate SpoIIAA, cleaving the protein proteolytically, and analyzing the one resulting radiolabelled peptide by the Edman degradation procedure, we show that the site of phosphorylation in SpoIIAA is Ser-58.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed2003

Involvement of sigma(H) and related sigma factors in glucose-dependent initiation of morphological and physiological development of Streptomyces griseus.

We cloned and characterized sigH encoding a stress-response sigma factor, sigma(H), of Streptomyces griseus. Nucleotide sequencing of the sigH gene cluster revealed an identical gene organization as in the orthologous region of Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2). Transcriptional analysis by S1 nuclease mapping showed the presence of three tandem promoters (P1-P3) that direct transcription of sigH. The activity of P1 was markedly reduced in a sigH-depleted mutant, suggesting its dependence on sigma(H). P1 was induced by addition of 0.7 M NaCl, and P2 was induced by heat shock at 45 degrees C or addition of 4% ethanol. The sigH mutant of S. griseus showed conditional defect in aerial mycelium formation and streptomycin production depending on high concentration of glucose (>2%). Meanwhile, the wild-type strain of S. griseus introduced with rshA encoding a probable anti-sigma factor for sigma(H) on a high-copy-number plasmid was unable to perform development on media containing 1% glucose while it showed wild-type phenotype on media containing 1% maltose. RshA inhibited the sigma(H)-dependent in vitro run-off transcription at P1, which confirmed its role as a negative regulator for sigma(H). Analysis of RshA-sigma interaction by an Escherichia coli two-hybrid system showed specific interaction of RshA with sigma(H) and two related sigma factors, sigma(L) and sigma(F). We speculate that the high copy number of rshA represses morphological and physiological development of S. griseus through simultaneous inactivation of sigma(H) and related stress-response sigma factors, which play an essential role in the onset of cellular differentiation and antibiotic production on glucose media.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed2006

A promoter switch that can rescue a plant sigma factor mutant.

Chloroplasts sigma factors act in concert with PEP, the bacterial-type plastid RNA polymerase. Using a sigma knockout line from Arabidopsis thaliana, we investigated mutant-specific changes in plastid gene expression at RNA level. One characteristic feature was the appearance of a long transcript that spans the atpB-E operon and extends considerably into the far-upstream region of atpB. This region reveals a cluster of typical promoter elements for NEP, the second (phage-type) plastid RNA polymerase. The NEP promoter cluster can help maintain RNA synthesis in situations where no functional sigma factor is available for PEP.

Amino Acid Motifs↗
PubMed2001

A multipartite interaction between Salmonella transcription factor sigma28 and its anti-sigma factor FlgM: implications for sigma28 holoenzyme destabilization through stepwise binding.

Transcription of the late (Class 3) flagellar promoters in Salmonella typhimurium is dependent upon the flagellar specific sigma factor, sigma28, encoded by the fliA gene. sigma28-dependent transcription is inhibited by an anti-sigma factor, FlgM, through a direct interaction. FlgM can bind both to free sigma28 to prevent it from forming a complex with core RNA polymerase, and to sigma28 holoenzyme to destabilize the complex. A collection of fliA mutants defective for negative regulation by FlgM (fliA* mutants) were isolated. This collection included 27 substitution mutations that conferred insensitivity to FlgM in vivo. The distribution of mutations defined three potential FlgM binding domains in conserved sigma factor regions 2.1, 3.1 and 4 of sigma28. A subset of mutants from each region was assayed for FlgM binding and transcriptional activity in vitro. The results strongly support a multipartite interaction between sigma28 and FlgM. Region 4 mutations, but not region 2.1 or 3.1 mutations, interfered with the ability of FlgM to destabilize sigma28 from core RNA polymerase. We present refined models for FlgM inhibition of sigma28, and for FlgM destabilization of sigma28 holoenzyme.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1994

A promoter melting region in the primary sigma factor of Bacillus subtilis. Identification of functionally important aromatic amino acids.

Sigma factor (sigma) is a dissociable subunit of bacterial RNA polymerase that determines promoter recognition. It has been proposed that a cluster of highly conserved aromatic amino acids in bacterial sigma factors (region 2.3) defines a melting motif that functions in strand-separation during open complex formation. We demonstrate that many alterations in region 2.3 of the Bacillus subtilis sigma A protein specifically impair open complex formation. The region 2.3 mutations can be grouped in three classes: (1) mutations that do not significantly affect promoter recognition or melting; (2) mutations that lead to cold-sensitive transcription of linear templates; and (3) mutations that lead to little activity on linear templates but retain activity at high temperatures on supercoiled templates. RNA polymerase holoenzymes containing sigma factor melting mutants (classes 2 and 3) form predominantly closed complexes at 40 degrees C and are defective for RNA synthesis when initiation is rate-limiting. The melting defect of these mutant sigma factors is suppressed by template supercoiling, but further enhanced by inclusion of the auxiliary RNA polymerase subunit delta. Consequently, in the presence of the delta polypeptide, the mutant holoenzymes display cold-sensitive transcription on supercoiled templates: conditions which mimic the in vivo situation. A subset of these mutations also affects promoter selectivity, suggesting that region 2.3 may participate in both -10 recognition and DNA melting.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1991

The chloroplast transcription apparatus from mustard (Sinapis alba L.). Evidence for three different transcription factors which resemble bacterial sigma factors.

A chloroplast protein fraction with sigma-like activity [Bülow, S. & Link, G. (1988) Plant Mol. Biol. 10, 349-357], was further purified and characterized. Chromatography on heparin-Sepharose, DEAE-Sepharose and Sephacryl S-300 led to the separation of three sigma-like factors (SLF) polypeptides with Mr 67,000 (SLF67), 52,000 (SLF52) and 29,000 (SLF29). None of these polypeptides bind to DNA itself, but each one confers enhanced binding and transcriptional activity when added to Escherichia coli RNA-polymerase core enzyme and DNA fragments carrying a chloroplast promoter. SLF67, SLF52, and SLF29 differ in their ionic-strength requirements for activity. They each mediate the binding to promoters of the chloroplast genes psbA, trnQ, and rps16, with different efficiencies. It is suggested that chloroplast transcription in vivo might be controlled at least in part by these functionally distinct factors.

Chloroplasts↗
PubMed1985

Bacillus subtilis sigma 28 and Escherichia coli sigma 32 (htpR) are minor sigma factors that display an overlapping promoter specificity.

Bacillus subtilis sigma 28-specific promoters (P28) are utilized by a minor form of B. subtilis RNA polymerase (sigma 28RNA polymerase) and not by the predominant RNA polymerases of B. subtilis (sigma 43 RNA polymerase) or Escherichia coli (sigma 70 RNA polymerase). However B. subtilis P28 are effective promoters in E. coli. This transcription depends on the E. coli htpR+ gene. Similarly, the E. coli rpoD heat shock promoter which is under control of htpR is used in vitro by B. subtilis sigma 28 RNA polymerase. These observations are explained by the fact that E. coli htpR is a minor sigma factor (sigma 32) which shares an overlapping promoter specificity with B. subtilis sigma 28 RNA polymerase. Hence control of bacterial regulons by minor sigma factors is not restricted to Bacilli, or bacteria that carry out a complex differentiation process, but is probably a general, regulatory mechanism in prokaryotes. Transcription from B. subtilis P28 in E. coli does not depend on a heat shock. This suggests that the sequences that control E. coli sigma 32 action are separate from those that control the heat shock regulon. Hence the action of polymerases controlled by minor sigma factors in both B. subtilis and E. coli appears to be controlled by a separate set of regulatory factors.

Bacillus subtilis↗
PubMed1996

Homologous pairs of regulatory proteins control activity of Bacillus subtilis transcription factor sigma(b) in response to environmental stress.

In Bacillus subtilis, activity of the general stress transcription factor sigma B is controlled posttranslationally by a regulatory network that transmits signals of environmental and metabolic stress. These signals include heat, ethanol, or osmotic challenge, or a sharp decrease in cellular energy levels, and all ultimately control sigma B activity by influencing the binding decision of the RsbW anti-sigma factor. In the absence of stress, RsbW binds to sigma B and prevents its association with RNA polymerase core enzyme. However, following stress, RsbW binds instead to the RsbV anti-anti-sigma factor, thereby releasing sigma B to direct transcription of its target genes. These two principal regulators of sigmaB activity are encoded in the eight-gene sigB operon, which has the gene order rsbR-rsbS-rsbT-rsbU-rsbV-rsbW-sig B-rsbX (where rsb stands for regulator of sigma B). Notably, the predicted rsbS product has significant amino acid identity to the RsbV anti-anti-sigma factor and the predicted rsbT product resembles the RsbW anti-sigma factor. To determine the roles of rsbS and rsbT, null or missense mutations were constructed in the chromosomal copies or each and tested for their effects on expression of a sigma B-dependent reporter fusion. On the basis of this genetic analysis, our principal conclusions are that (i) the rsbS product is a negative regulator of or" activity, (ii) the rsbT product is a positive regulator, (iii) RsbS requires RsbT for function, and (iv) the RsbS-RsbT and RsbV-RsbW pairs act hierarchically by a common mechanism in which key protein-protein interactions are controlled by phosphorylation events.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1991

Molecular cloning and characterization of two genes encoding sigma factors that direct transcription from a Bacillus thuringiensis crystal protein gene promoter.

Two sigma factors, sigma 35 and sigma 28, direct transcription from the Bt I and Bt II promoters of the cryIA(a) gene of Bacillus thuringiensis; this gene encodes a lepidopteran-specific crystal protoxin. These sigma factors were biochemically characterized in previous work (K. L. Brown and H. R. Whiteley, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85:4166-4170, 1988; K. L. Brown and H. R. Whiteley, J. Bacteriol. 172:6682-6688, 1990). In this paper, we describe the cloning of the genes encoding these two sigma factors, as well as their nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequences. The deduced amino acid sequences of the sigma 35 and sigma 28 genes show 88 and 85% identity, respectively, to the sporulation-specific sigma E and sigma K polypeptides of Bacillus subtilis. Transformation of the sigma 35 and sigma 28 genes into B. subtilis shows that the respective B. thuringiensis sigma factor genes can complement spoIIG55 (sigma E) and spoIIIC94 (sigma K) defects. Further, B. thuringiensis core polymerase reconstituted with either the sigma 35 or sigma 28 polypeptide directs transcription from B. subtilis promoters recognized by B. subtilis RNA polymerase containing sigma E and sigma K, respectively. Thus, sigma 35 and sigma 28 of B. thuringiensis appear to be functionally equivalent to sigma E and sigma K of B. subtilis. However, unlike the situation for sigma K in B. subtilis, the homologous sigma 28 gene in B. thuringiensis does not result from a late-sporulation-phase chromosomal rearrangement of two separate, partial genes.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1999

The Escherichia coli sigma(E)-dependent extracytoplasmic stress response is controlled by the regulated proteolysis of an anti-sigma factor.

The activity of the stress-responsive sigma factor, sigma(E), is induced by the extracytoplasmic accumulation of misfolded or unfolded protein. The inner membrane protein RseA is the central regulatory molecule in this signal transduction cascade and acts as a sigma(E)-specific anti-sigma factor. Here we show that sigma(E) activity is primarily determined by the ratio of RseA to sigma(E). RseA is rapidly degraded in response to extracytoplasmic stress, leading to an increase in the free pool of sigma(E) and initiation of the stress response. We present evidence that the putative inner membrane serine protease, DegS, is responsible for this regulated degradation of RseA.

Bacterial Proteins↗
PubMed1997

The C-terminal half of the anti-sigma factor, FlgM, becomes structured when bound to its target, sigma 28.

The interaction between the flagellum specific sigma factor, sigma 28, and its inhibitor, FlgM, was examined using multidimensional heteronuclear NMR. Here we observe that free FlgM is mostly unfolded, but about 50% of the residues become structured when bound to sigma 28. Our analysis suggests that the sigma 28 binding domain of FlgM is contained within the last 57 amino acids of the protein while the first 40 amino acids are unstructured in both the free and bound states. Genetic analysis of flgM mutants that fail to inhibit sigma 28 activity reveal amino acid changes that are also isolated to the C-terminal 57 residues of FlgM. We postulate that the lack of structure in free and bound FlgM is important to its role as an exported protein.

Bacterial Proteins↗
PubMed2001

Role of activator site position and a distal UP-element half-site for sigma factor selectivity at a CRP/H-NS-activated sigma(s)-dependent promoter in Escherichia coli.

Transcription initiation by the stress-associated sigma(S)-containing RNA polymerase holoenzyme (E sigma(S)) in Escherichia coli is often subject to complex regulation that involves multiple additional regulators and histone-like proteins. csiD is a stationary phase-inducible sigma(S)-dependent gene in E. coli that requires activation by cAMP-CRP (bound to a site centred at -68.5 nucleotides upstream of the transcriptional start site) and is positively modulated by the abundant nucleoid-associated proteins H-NS and Lrp. By shifting the CRP box to positions between -80.5 and -60.5, we could demonstrate that: (i) activation is equally helix phase dependent as at classic class I promoters; (ii) E sigma(S) prefers a CRP box location at -68.5/-70.5, whereas E sigma(70) is nearly inactive with such an arrangement; and (iii) with the CRP site moved to -60.5, transcription can be initiated efficiently by both holoenzymes. The csiD promoter region also contains a distal UP-element half-site located downstream of the CRP box, as demonstrated by mutational studies, in which this element was either eliminated or completed to a full UP-element. The UP-element half-site favours E sigma(S)-mediated expression, whereas with the full UP-element, nearly wild-type levels of csiD transcription were observed in the absence of sigma(S). Finally, we show that the two histone-like proteins, H-NS and Lrp, both act by influencing activation by cAMP-CRP, but do so by different mechanisms. In particular, H-NS directly or indirectly increases positional stringency for the CRP binding site. The implications of these findings with respect to sigma factor selectivity, activation mechanisms used by the two holoenzymes and the architecture of sigma(S)-dependent promoters are discussed.

Bacterial Proteins↗
PubMed2005

Alternative sigma factors and their roles in bacterial virulence.

Sigma factors provide promoter recognition specificity to RNA polymerase holoenzyme, contribute to DNA strand separation, and then dissociate from the core enzyme following transcription initiation. As the regulon of a single sigma factor can be composed of hundreds of genes, sigma factors can provide effective mechanisms for simultaneously regulating expression of large numbers of prokaryotic genes. One newly emerging field is identification of the specific roles of alternative sigma factors in regulating expression of virulence genes and virulence-associated genes in bacterial pathogens. Virulence genes encode proteins whose functions are essential for the bacterium to effectively establish an infection in a host organism. In contrast, virulence-associated genes can contribute to bacterial survival in the environment and therefore may enhance the capacity of the bacterium to spread to new individuals or to survive passage through a host organism. As alternative sigma factors have been shown to regulate expression of both virulence and virulence-associated genes, these proteins can contribute both directly and indirectly to bacterial virulence. Sigma factors are classified into two structurally unrelated families, the sigma70 and the sigma54 families. The sigma70 family includes primary sigma factors (e.g., Bacillus subtilis sigma(A)) as well as related alternative sigma factors; sigma54 forms a distinct subfamily of sigma factors referred to as sigma(N) in almost all species for which these proteins have been characterized to date. We present several examples of alternative sigma factors that have been shown to contribute to virulence in at least one organism. For each sigma factor, when applicable, examples are drawn from multiple species.

Gram-Negative Bacteria↗
PubMed1999

Expression of the Escherichia coli NRZ nitrate reductase is highly growth phase dependent and is controlled by RpoS, the alternative vegetative sigma factor.

In the absence of oxygen, many bacteria preferentially use nitrate as a terminal electron acceptor for anaerobic respiration. In Escherichia coli, there are two membrane-bound, differentially regulated nitrate reductases. While the physiological basis for this metabolic redundancy is not completely understood, during exponential growth, synthesis of NRA is greatly induced by anaerobiosis plus nitrate, whereas NRZ is expressed at a low level that is not influenced by anaerobiosis or nitrate. In the course of identifying genes controlled by the stationary phase regulatory factor RpoS (sigmas), we found that the expression of NRZ is induced during entry into stationary phase and highly dependent on this alternative sigma factor. Expression studies, using operon fusions and nitrate reductase assays, revealed that the NRZ operon is controlled mainly at the level of transcription and is induced 10-fold at the onset of stationary phase in rich media. Consistent with previous reports of RpoS expression, the RpoS dependency of NRZ in minimal media was very high (several hundredfold). We also observed a fivefold stationary phase induction of NRZ in an rpoS background, indicating that other regulatory factors, besides RpoS, are probably involved in transcriptional control of NRZ. The RpoS dependence of NRZ expression was confirmed by Northern analyses using RNA extracted from wild-type and rpoS- strains sampled in exponential and stationary phase. In toto, these data indicate that RpoS-mediated regulation of NRZ may be an important physiological adaptation that allows the cell to use nitrate under stress-associated conditions.

Aerobiosis↗
PubMed1996

Two-stage regulation of an anti-sigma factor determines developmental fate during bacterial endospore formation.

During endospore formation in Bacillus subtilis an asymmetric division produces two cells, forespore and mother cell, which follow different developmental paths. Commitment to the forespore-specific developmental path is controlled in part by the activation of the forespore-specific RNA polymerase sigma factor, sigma F. Activity of sigma F is inhibited in the mother cell by the anti-sigma factor SpoIIAB. In the forespore, sigma F directs transcription of the structural gene for sigma G. However, sigma G does not become active until after engulfment of the forespore is complete. This sigma G activity is dependent upon the products of the spoIIIA operon. We showed that sigma G is present but mostly inactive in a spoIIIA mutant. We also demonstrated that the anti-sigma factor SpoIIAB can bind to sigma G in vitro. Moreover, a mutant form of sigma G that binds SpoIIAB inefficiently in vitro was shown to function independently of SpoIIIA during sporulation. These and previously reported results support a model in which SpoIIAB functions as an inhibitor of sigma G activity during sporulation. Therefore, we propose that the anti-sigma factor SpoIIAB antagonizes both sigma F and sigma G activities, and that this antagonism is relieved in the forespore in two stages. In the first stage, which follows septation, a SpoIIAA-dependent mechanism partially relieves SpoIIAB inhibition of sigma F activity in the forespore. In the second stage, which follows forespore engulfment, a SpoIIIA-dependent process inactivates SpoIIAB in the forespore, resulting in the activation of sigma G.

Adenine Nucleotides↗