Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Retrotransposable elements”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 145 records · Page 8Linked to original sources

An investigation of the cause of low variability on the fourth chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster.

The fourth chromosome of Drosophila melanogaster lacks meiotic recombination. There is also a lack of nucleotide variation on the chromosome. This lack of variation could have been caused by a recent selective sweep, by background selection, or by a combination of these two forces. It should be possible to differentiate between the two mechanisms by studying the frequencies of polymorphic sites on the chromosome: a selective sweep should have resulted in low-frequency polymorphisms, whereas higher frequency polymorphisms would indicate the action of background selection. We have analyzed retrotransposable element insertions on the fourth chromosome in 11 strains of D. melanogaster. The polymorphisms found have a range of frequencies, with the presence of some insertions with high frequencies suggesting that the lack of variation is the result of background selection. We summarize the data using two statistics: the number of sites shared by more than one of the sample of 11 chromosomes (internal sites) and the mean number of transposable element differences in presence or absence between the sampled chromosomes. Simulations indicate that a selective sweep occurring more than 15,000 (0.03N) generations ago cannot be ruled out from the number of internal sites, although the number of differences between the chromosomes suggests either background selection or a sweep occurring more than 60,000 (0.12N) generations ago. Our results show no homoplasies and are thus consistent with no recombination occurring on the chromosome. The difficulties of distinguishing between the models using polymorphism data are discussed.

Animals↗

The evolution of Ty1-copia group retrotransposons in gymnosperms.

A diverse collection of Ty1-copia group retrotransposons has been characterized from the genome of Picea abies (Norway spruce) by degenerate PCR amplification of a region of the reverse transcriptase gene. The occurrence of these retrotransposable elements in the gymnosperms was investigated by Southern blot hybridization analysis. The distribution of the different retrotransposons across the gymnosperms varies greatly. All of the retrotransposon clones isolated are highly conserved within the Picea (spruce) genus, many are also present in Pinus (pine) and/or Abies (fir) genera, and some share strongly homologous sequences with one or more of cedar, larch, Sequoia, cypress, and Ginkgo. Further subclones of one of the most strongly conserved retrotransposon sequences, Tpa28, were obtained from Ginkgo and P. abies. Comparisons of individual sequence pairs between the two species show nucleotide cross-homologies of around 80%-85%, corresponding to nucleotide substitution rates similar to those of nuclear protein-coding genes. Analysis of Tpa28 consensus sequences reveals that strong purifying selection has acted on this retrotransposon in the lineages connecting Ginkgo and Picea. Collectively, these data suggest, first, that the evolution of the Ty1-copia retrotransposon group in the gymnosperms is dominated by germ line vertical transmission, with strong selection for reverse transcriptase sequence, and, second, that extinction of individual retrotransposon types has been comparatively rare in gymnosperm species lineages compared with angiosperms. If this very high level of sequence conservation is a general property of the retrotransposons, then their extreme sequence diversity implies that they are extremely ancient, and the major element lineages seen today may have arisen early in eukaryote evolution. The data are also consistent with horizontal transmission of particular retrotransposons between species, but such a mechanism is unnecessary to explain the results.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Evolution of the T1 retroposon family in the Anopheles gambiae complex.

The T1 family of retrotransposable elements is interspersed and moderately repeated in five member species of the Anopheles gambiae sibling-species complex and has diverged little since the radiation of the complex. T1 includes two closely related but independent subfamilies, defined by the presence or absence of linked sets of restriction sites, in all but one species, although the relative abundance of the subfamilies differs within each. Sequence analysis of a 349-bp region from 21 clones isolated from A. gambiae confirmed the bipartite organization by revealing 19 coordinated nucleotide differences between the two subfamilies--T1 alpha and T1 beta. Sequence divergence is not only greater between than within subfamilies, but divergence within T1 beta is less than that within T1 alpha. Between-species comparisons of genomic consensus restriction maps revealed that T1 alpha is fixed for species-diagnostic differences in all species. With one exception, these subfamilies account for approximately 70% of detectable T1 copies in the genome. The results support retroposition as the dominant mechanism underlying the evolution of the T1 family.

Animals↗

A temperature cline in copy number for 412 but not roo/B104 retrotransposons in populations of Drosophila simulans.

The copy number of the retrotransposable element 412 of Drosophila simulans from populations collected worldwide shows a negative correlation with minimum temperature. No association was detected for the roo/B104 element. The possibility that selective pressures might regulate the 412 copy number in these natural populations is supported by detection of selection against the detrimental effects of 412 insertions (estimated by the proportion of insertions on the X chromosome in comparison with the autosomes) but not roo/B104. These data reveal different spatial patterns for two element families, and strongly suggest that some factors in the environment, such as temperature, may interfere with the control of retrotransposition, thus affecting important aspects of genomic evolution.

Animals↗

Fidelity of retrotransposon replication.

Ty1, the genetically tractable retrotransposable element found in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, closely resembles vertebrate retroviruses both in structure and in mechanism of replication. By direct sequence analysis, we examined the rate and spectrum of new mutations appearing during a single cycle of Ty1 replication. The rate of new mutations was comparable to those seen for replicating retroviruses. All observed changes were base substitutions, and their location suggested that template ends may be hot spots for generating these mutations. To test this, we developed methods to examine, at the nucleotide level, the end structure of the expected Ty1 replication intermediates. Our results demonstrate that Ty1 reverse transcriptase can add terminal non-templated bases in vivo during each step in replication. Furthermore, Ty1 RNAse H creates multiple template ends by imprecisely cleaving RNA. This expands the range of sites of subsequent non-templated base addition. Finally, on reaching template ends, Ty1 reverse transcriptase can strand transfer to inappropriate templates. Taken together, these mutagenic mechanisms may influence the evolution of particular regions of the Ty1 genome and serve as a mechanism to regulate the overall level of Ty1 transposition in its host cell.

Animals↗

UVB irradiation upregulation of the Drosophila 1731 retrotransposon LTR requires the same short sequence of U3 region in a human epithelial cell line as in Drosophila cells.

Phylogenetic analysis of the retrotransposon and retrovirus suggests an evolutionary relationship between them and indicates that transactivation of the long terminal repeat (LTR)-containing retroelements could be ubiquitous. Using constructs expressing a reporter gene under the control of the entire or deleted LTR of 1731, which is a retrotransposable element of Drosophila melanogaster, we were able to show that the UVB-irradiation activation of the 1731-LTR requires the same short sequence of U3 region in a human epithelial cell line as in Schneider's Drosophila cell line (S2). This sequence is similar to the binding sequence of the members of the nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-kappa B)/rel family. In addition, human colonic carcinoma cells (HT29), in response to UVB-irradiation, produce some extracellular factor(s) that activates the 1731-LTR in nonirradiated cells.

Animals↗

Evolution of antiviral host defenses against a backdrop of endogenous retroelements.

Mammalian hosts deploy a multitude of germ line-encoded mechanisms to detect and restrict virus infection. These mechanisms must avoid pathological responses to endogenous retroviruses and other endogenous retrotransposable elements (RTEs)-viruses and viruslike genomic parasites that have invaded the host germ line and are passed down the generations as host genes. Although the location, specificity, and sensitivity of innate pattern recognition receptors and restriction factors are tuned to facilitate discrimination of infecting viruses from those that are part of self, immune cross-reactions do occur. The RTE viral heritage may, therefore, compromise the ability of the host to respond to virus infection without risking pathology. Nevertheless, RTEs have the potential to be co-opted as an alarm amplification system, to be repurposed as antiviral factors, and to contribute to the evolution of antiviral genes.

Animals↗

Bacterial group II introns in a deep-sea hydrothermal vent environment.

Group II introns are catalytic RNAs and mobile retrotransposable elements known to be present in the genomes of some nonmarine bacteria and eukaryotic organelles. Here we report the discovery of group II introns in a bacterial mat sample collected from a deep-sea hydrothermal vent near 9 degrees N on the East Pacific Rise. One of the introns was shown to self-splice in vitro. This is the first example of marine bacterial introns from molecular population structure studies of microorganisms that live in the proximity of hydrothermal vents. These types of mobile genetic elements may prove useful in improving our understanding of bacterial genome evolution and may serve as valuable markers in comparative studies of bacterial communities.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Structural analysis of TRAS1, a novel family of telomeric repeat-associated retrotransposons in the silkworm, Bombyx mori.

We characterized TRAS1, a retrotransposable element which was inserted into the telomeric repetitive sequence (CCTAA)n of the silkworm, Bombyx mori. The complete sequence of TRAS1, a stretch of 7.8 kb with a poly(A) tract at the 3' end, was determined. No long terminal repeat (LTR) was found at the termini of the element. TRAS1 contains gag- and pol-like open reading frames (ORFs) which are similar to those of non-LTR retrotransposons. The two ORFs overlap but are one nucleotide out of frame (+1 frameshift). Most of the approximately 250 copies of TRAS1 elements in the genome were highly conserved in the structure. Chromosomal in situ hybridization showed that TRAS1 elements are clustered at the telomeres of Bombyx chromosomes. A phylogenetic analysis using the amino acid sequence of the reverse transcriptase domain within the pol-like ORF revealed that TRAS1 falls into one lineage with R1, which is a family of non-LTR retrotransposons inserted into the same site within the 28S ribosomal DNA unit in most insects. TRAS1 may have been derived from R1 and changed the target specificity so that TRAS1 inserts into the telomeric repetitive sequence (CCTAA)n. Southern hybridization and Bal 31 exonuclease analyses showed that TRAS1 elements are clustered proximal to the terminal long tract of (CCTAA)n. TRAS1 is a novel family of non-LTR retrotransposons which are inserted into the telomeric repetitive sequences as target sites.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Downstream 28S gene sequences on the RNA template affect the choice of primer and the accuracy of initiation by the R2 reverse transcriptase.

R2 non-long terminal repeat retrotransposable elements insert at a unique site in the 28S rRNA genes of insects. The protein encoded by the single open reading frame of R2 is capable of conducting the initial steps of its integration in vitro. The protein nicks the noncoding strand of the 28S target DNA (the strand which serves as a template for RNA synthesis) and uses the 3' hydroxyl group exposed by this nick to prime reverse transcription of the R2 RNA template. This target-primed reverse transcription (TPRT) reaction requires that the RNA template contains the 250-nucleotide 3' untranslated region of the R2 element. If this RNA template ends at the precise 3' end of the R2 element, then extra nucleotides, which we refer to as nontemplated nucleotides, are added to the target before cDNA synthesis. The presence of downstream 28S gene sequences on the RNA template reduces the total efficiency but eliminates these nontemplated additions, resulting in nearly 90% of all TPRT products reproducing the 3' junctions seen in vivo. Templates with 5 to 10 nucleotides of the 28S sequence are used most efficiently in this in vitro TPRT reaction. The requirement for downstream 28S rRNA sequences probably explains why the R2 elements of most insects differ from the majority of non-long terminal repeat retrotransposons in that they do not contain an A-rich repeat at their 3' junction with the target DNA. The presence of downstream sequences on these in vitro R2 templates also revealed that the R2 reverse transcriptase can prime cDNA synthesis by using the 3' end of another RNA molecule. This RNA-primed cDNA synthesis is not based on sequence complementarity between the RNA primer and the R2 template. The ability to use the 3' end of a noncomplementary RNA molecule has also been seen with the reverse transcriptase of the mitochondrial Mauriceville plasmid of Neurospora crassa.

Animals↗

Integration of Bombyx mori R2 sequences into the 28S ribosomal RNA genes of Drosophila melanogaster.

R2 non-long-terminal-repeat retrotransposable elements integrate into a precise location in the 28S rRNA genes of arthropods. The purified protein encoded by R2 can cleave the 28S gene target site and use the 3' hydroxyl group generated by this cleavage to prime reverse transcription of its own RNA, a process called target-primed reverse transcription. An integration system is described here in which components from the R2 element of the silkmoth, Bombyx mori, are injected into the preblastoderm embryo of Drosophila melanogaster. Silkmoth R2 sequences were readily detected in the 28S rRNA genes of the surviving adults as well as in the genes of their progeny. The 3' junctions of these insertions were similar to those seen in our in vitro assays, as well as those from endogenous R2 retrotransposition events. The 5' junctions of the insertions originally contained major deletions of both R2 and 28S gene sequences, a problem overcome by the inclusion of upstream 28S gene sequences at the 5' end of the injected RNA. The resulting 5' junctions suggested a recombination event between the cDNA and the upstream target sequences. This in vivo integration system should help determine the mechanism of R2 retrotransposition and be useful as a delivery system to integrate defined DNA sequences into the rRNA genes of organisms.

Animals↗

The pericentromeric heterochromatin of the grass Zingeria biebersteiniana (2n = 4) is composed of Zbcen1-type tandem repeats that are intermingled with accumulated dispersedly organized sequences.

DNA reassociation and hydroxyapatite chromatography were used to isolate high-copy DNA of the grass Zingeria biebersteiniana (2n = 4). In situ hybridization demonstrated that the DNA isolated was enriched for pericentromere-specific repetitive sequences. One abundant pericentromere-specific component is the differentially methylated tandem-repeat family Zbcen1. Other sequences isolated, Zb46 and Zb47A, are dispersed and display similarity to parts of the gypsy- and copia-like retrotransposable elements of other grasses. In situ hybridization with the copia-like sequence Zb47A resulted in dispersed labelling along the chromosome arms, with a significant signal accumulation in the pericentromeric region of all chromosomes. It is concluded that the pericentromeric heterochromatin of Z. biebersteiniana is composed of members of the Zbcen1 tandem repeat family and that these tandem arrays are intermingled with accumulated putative copia-like retrotransposon sequences. An observed Rab1 interphase orientation suggests that the length of the chromosomes rather than the genome size is the determining factor of the Rab1 phenomenon.

Centromere↗

Secondary structure models of the 3' untranslated regions of diverse R2 RNAs.

The RNA structure of the 3' untranslated region (UTR) of the R2 retrotransposable element is recognized by the R2-encoded reverse transcriptase in a reaction called target primed reverse transcription (TPRT). To provide insight into structure-function relationships important for TPRT, we have created alignments that reveal the secondary structure for 22 Drosophila and five silkmoth 3' UTR R2 sequences. In addition, free energy minimization has been used to predict the secondary structure for the 3' UTR R2 RNA of Forficula auricularia. The predicted structures for Bombyx mori and F. auricularia are consistent with chemical modification data obtained with beta-ethoxy-alpha-ketobutyraldehyde (kethoxal), dimethyl sulfate, and 1-cyclohexyl-3-(2-morpholinoethyl)carbodiimide metho-p-toluene sulfonate. The structures appear to have common helices that are likely important for function.

3' Untranslated Regions↗

Genome size as a mutation-selection-drift process.

A novel method for estimating neutral rates and patterns of DNA evolution in Drosophila takes advantage of the propensity of non-LTR retrotransposable elements to create nonfunctional, transpositionally inactive copies as a product of transposition. For many LINE elements, most copies present in a genome at any one time are nonfunctional "dead-on-arrival" (DOA) copies. Because these are off-shoots of active, transpositionally competent "master" lineages, in a gene tree of a LINE element from multiple samples from related species, the DOA lineages are expected to map to the terminal branches and the active lineages to the internal branches, the primary exceptions being when the sample includes DOA copies that are allelic or orthologous. Analysis of nucleotide substitutions and other changes along the terminal branches therefore allows estimation of the fixation process in the DOA copies, which are unconstrained with respect to protein coding; and under selective neutrality, the fixation process estimates the underlying mutational pattern. We have studied the retroelement Helena in Drosophila. An unexpectedly high rate of DNA loss was observed, yielding a half-life of unconstrained DNA sequences approximately 60-fold faster in Drosophila than in mammals. The high rate of DNA loss suggests a straightforward explanation of the seeming paradox that Drosophila has many fewer pseudogenes than found in mammalian species. Differential rates of deletion in different taxa might also contribute to the celebrated C-value paradox of why some closely related organisms can have very different DNA contents. New data presented here rule out the possibility that the transposition process itself is highly mutagenic, hence the observed linear relation between number of deletions and number of nucleotide substitutions is most easily explained by the hypothesis that both types of changes accumulate in unconstrained sequences over time.

Animals↗

Saccharomyces paradoxus and Saccharomyces cerevisiae are associated with exudates of North American oaks.

Genetic hybridization and karyotypic analyses revealed the biological species Saccharomyces paradoxus and Saccharomyces cerevisiae in exudates from North American oaks for the first time. In addition, two strains collected from elm flux and from Drosophila by Phaff in 1961 and 1952 were reidentified as S. paradoxus. Each strain studied showed a unique profile of chromosomal hybridization with a probe for the retrotransposable element Ty1. The wild distribution of natural Saccharomyces sensu stricto yeasts is discussed.

DNA, Fungal↗

Identification and characterization of JMJD2 family genes in silico.

JMJD1 family genes, including JMJD1 (TSGA), TRIP8, and C5orf7 (5qNCA), encode nuclear proteins with Jumonji C (JmjC), TRI8H1 and TRI8H2 domains. Here, we identified JMJD2 family genes. Human genes corresponding to KIAA0677, KIAA0876, KIAA0780 and FLJ10251 cDNAs were designated JMJD2A, JMJD2B, JMJD2C, and JMJD2D, respectively. In addition, JMJD2D homologous genes within human genome sequences AP002383.3 and AP001264.4 were designated JMJD2E and JMJD2F, respectively. JMJD2A gene was mapped to human chromosome 1p34.1, JMJD2B gene to 19p13.3, and JMJD2C gene to 9p24.1. JMJD2D, JMJD2E and JMJD2F genes were clustered at human chromosome 11q21. Coding region of JMJD2A, JMJD2B, JMJD2C genes was located on multiple exons, while that of JMJD2D, JMJD2E and JMJD2F genes was located on a single exon. These facts strongly indicate that JMJD2D, JMJD2E and JMJD2F genes are locally triplicated retrotransposed elements derived from JMJD2 family gene. JD2H domain with C2HC2HC2- and C5HC2-type Cys (His) clusters was identified as the region conserved among JMJD2A (1064 aa), JMJD2B (1096 aa), and JMJD2C (1056 aa) proteins. JMJD2A, JMJD2B and JMJD2C consist of JmjN, JmjC, JD2H, and two TUDOR domains, while JMJD2D (523 aa), JMJD2E (506 aa) and JMJD2F (638 aa) consist of JmjN and JmjC domains. JMJD2 family proteins were classified into one group with JD2H and TUDOR domains and another group without JD2H or TUDOR domains. Because JMJD2C gene (also known as GASC1 gene) is amplified in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), JMJD2 family genes are cancer-associated genes. This is the first report on identification and characterization of human JMJD2 gene family.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Evolution of R1 and R2 in the rDNA units of the genus Drosophila.

R1 and R2 are non-long terminal repeat (non-LTR) retrotransposable elements that specifically insert in the 28S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) genes of insects. Using the Drosophila genus, which includes some of the best characterized insect taxa, we have conducted a number of studies on the evolution of these elements. We find that R1 and R2 are subject to the same recombinational forces that give rise to the concerted evolution of the rDNA units. The turnover of R1 and R2 elements can be readily documented in different strains of D. melanogaster using 5' truncated elements as restriction-length polymorphisms. This turnover leads to uniform populations of elements with nucleotide sequence divergence of different copies averaging only 0.23% for the R2 and 0.47% for the R1 elements. Molecular phylogenetic analysis of elements from 16 different species of Drosophila suggests that these elements have been stable components of the rDNA locus for the 50-70 million year history of the Drosophila genus. Using changes at synonymous positions within the protein-encoding regions as estimates of the baseline substitution rate, it could be shown that R1 and R2 are evolving at rates similar to that of typical protein encoding genes provided corrections are made for the low codon bias of the elements. R1 and R2 are clearly well-adapted for their existence in the rDNA units of their host.

Animals↗