Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Metformin”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 145 records · Page 8Linked to original sources

Effect of metformin on advanced glycation endproduct formation and peripheral nerve function in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats.

The effects of metformin treatment on advanced glycation endproduct formation and peripheral nerve function in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats were examined. Streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats were treated with low dose metformin (50-65 mg kg(-1) daily) or high dose metformin (500-650 mg kg(-1) daily) for 10 weeks. While the metformin-untreated diabetic group showed a significant increase of advanced glycation endproducts (6.1-fold in the lens, 1.6-fold in the sciatic nerve, 2.3-fold in the renal cortex, and 1.9-fold in plasma; all P < 0.01) compared with the healthy control group, both metformin-treated groups had significantly less advanced glycation endproduct deposition. The % decrease in the diabetes-induced increase in advanced glycation endproduct formation by low and high dose metformin treatment was 25% and 72% in the lens (both P < 0.01), 31% and 42% in the sciatic nerve (both P < 0.05), and 16% and 33% in the renal cortex (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01), respectively. However, the plasma advanced glycation endproduct level showed no significant difference from that in the untreated diabetic group, in spite of slight decrease in plasma glucose and glycated hemoglobin levels in the metformin-treated groups. The diabetes-induced sciatic nerve conduction velocity deficits were improved by 46% and 42% by low and high dose metformin treatment, respectively (both P < 0.01). These data suggest that metformin may have a direct antiglycative action, which in turn contributes to amelioration of peripheral nerve function. Thus, metformin treatment may be effective in the prevention of diabetic complications through not only lowering plasma glucose, but also directly inhibiting advanced glycation endproduct formation.

Animals↗

Effect of metformin on nitric oxide synthase in genetically obese (ob/ob) mice.

Genetically obese (ob/ob) mice were employed for the study of the effect of metformin on activity and expression of nitric oxide synthase (NOS ) in vitro and in vivo. For in vitro analysis, mouse liver extracts were used. For the in vivo study, (ob/ob) and their control litter mates (ob/c) mice were injected with specified amounts of metformin and the expression of NOS in the adipose tissue and hypothalamus was measured by Western blotting. Results show that metformin exhibited a biphasic effect on NOS activity in vitro. Expression of metformin was differentially altered in the hypothalamus and adipose tissues of the normal and ob/ob animals that were treated with metformin. Further, a significant decrease in food intake occurred in the (ob/ob) mice that received metformin. This decrease in food intake was not accompanied by changes in serum glucose. At inhibitory concentrations, hypothalamic NOS expression changes differentially in normal and ob/ob mice. In normal mice, metformin stimulated NOS expression, while in ob/ob mice there was an inhibition. NOS expression increased in brown adipose tissue of metformin treated control mice, while no such increase was observed in ob/ob mice. No effect of metformin was observed in white adipose tissue of control or obese mice. Thus, metformin may produce anorectic effects through modulation of NOS.

Adipose Tissue, Brown↗

Metformin: a new oral biguanide.

The biguanide metformin is an oral anti-hyperglycemic agent used in the treatment of patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). Metformin is an important addition to the drug therapy options available for those patients because it reduces blood glucose levels predominantly by decreasing hepatic glucose production and release and also by increasing peripheral tissue sensitivity to insulin; it does not stimulate insulin secretion from the beta cells in the pancreas. Metformin also has a potentially beneficial effect by reducing serum lipid levels. Its glycemic control is similar to that of the sulfonylureas and is effective as monotherapy or in combination with sulfonylureas or insulin. Unlike sulfonylureas and insulin, it does not cause a gain in body weight, and when used as monotherapy, it does not cause hypoglycemia. The most common side effects associated with metformin are mild, transient, gastrointestinal symptoms, which are usually self-limiting. These side effects can be minimized by initiating metformin therapy at a low dose and gradually titrating upward, and by taking metformin with meals. Lactic acidosis caused by metformin is rare, and the risk of this complication may be diminished by the observance of prescribing precautions and contraindications that avoid accumulation of metformin or lactate in the body. In patients who are not getting the desired effect with sulfonylureas, it is useful to combine sulfonylureas with metformin therapy. Metformin should be considered a first-line agent, particularly in obese and/or hyperlipidemic NIDDM patients.

Animals↗

Metformin as secondary therapy in a defined population with type 2 diabetes.

This study was undertaken to assess the effect of metformin as a second-line oral antihyperglycemic agent in a defined population with type 2 diabetes mellitus. We measured the extent and circumstances of metformin use in the 15,000-person diabetes registry of a large, group-model health maintenance organization (HMO). Among subsets of patients in whom adequate glycemic control could not be maintained with sulfonylurea (SU) therapy, we compared glycemic control before and after metformin use to glycemic control during a similar interval before metformin was introduced. Metformin users were significantly more likely than nonusers to have had poor glycemic control at baseline. Nearly two thirds (63.8%) of patients with a glycosylated hemoglobin (Hb A1c) level >10% switched to metformin, as did 46.3% of those with an Hb A1c level of 8% to 10%. In all patients (metformin users and nonusers) in whom SU therapy failed to maintain glycemic control, Hb A1c levels decreased 0.9% after metformin was introduced, compared with a decrease of 0.4% during the control period. In a group-model HMO that promoted the use of metformin as second-line therapy in patients unable to maintain glycemic control with SU therapy, metformin reduced hyperglycemic levels.

Adult↗

The effect of metformin on blood pressure and metabolism in nondiabetic hypertensive patients.

OBJECTIVES: To study the effect of metformin on blood pressure and metabolism in nondiabetic hypertensives. DESIGN: A six-week single-blind placebo wash-out, followed by a double-blind placebo-controlled parallel group design with skew randomization (2:2:1) to metformin 850 mg b.i.d. (n = 10), metformin 500 mg b.i.d. (n = 10), or placebo b.i.d. (n = 5) for 12 weeks. Office blood pressure (oBP), ambulatory blood pressure (aBP), lipoproteins, and oral glucose tolerance (OGTT) were measured/performed before and during treatment. SUBJECTS: Sixteen male and nine female nondiabetic (OGTT) patients (median age 57 (39-74) years) with verified hypertension (White-coat excluded) for 4 (0-20) years. RESULTS: The possible effect of metformin treatment and dosage was tested with a two-factor analysis of variance. Treatment induced a significant decline in diastolic oBP, P < 0.05. This decline was, however, not significantly different comparing metformin and placebo. Systolic oBP, diastolic aBP, and systolic aBP showed no significant change by treatment. The decline in diastolic oBP was 5 mmHg in the pooled group of metformin-treated patients, P < 0.005. Different gender and the presence of obesity had no impact on the decline in diastolic oBP within this group. Changes in fasting C-peptide and fasting insulin during treatment were unrelated to blood pressure changes. High fasting insulin (> 60 pmol L[-1]) or high fasting C-peptide (> 1000 pmol L[-1]) at baseline did not favour an effect of metformin on diastolic oBP. Glucose metabolism and lipoproteins were unchanged in all groups. CONCLUSIONS: Although metformin treatment induced a decline in diastolic office blood pressure in nondiabetic hypertensives, the decline was not different from that during placebo treatment. Metformin had no significant effect on ambulatory blood pressure. Thus, metformin has, if any, only a minor clinically insignificant effect on blood pressure in nondiabetic hypertensives. The study does not support the hypothesis that circulating insulin is a major regulator of blood pressure in hypertension.

Adult↗

Greater reductions in A1C in type 2 diabetic patients new to therapy with glyburide/metformin tablets as compared to glyburide co-administered with metformin.

BACKGROUND: A cohort of patients with type 2 diabetes, prescribed glyburide/metformin tablets, experienced significantly greater improvements in glycaemic control compared to patients receiving glyburide co-administered with metformin. AIM: To compare the change in A1C for type 2 diabetic patients new to combination therapy with fixed-dose glyburide/metformin tablets vs. glyburide co-administered with metformin in a usual-care setting. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study analysed medication usage via an administrative pharmacy claims database and the patients' corresponding laboratory results. Patients were new to antidiabetic combination therapy with glyburide/metformin tablets or glyburide co-administered with metformin between August 2000 and July 2001 and had A1C measurements at baseline and within 76-194 days of initiating combination therapy. The change from baseline in A1C was analysed using statistical regression to adjust for significant covariates (baseline A1C and dosage). Adherence with therapy was also compared. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 950 patients who received glyburide/metformin tablets and 471 taking glyburide co-administered with metformin. Glyburide/metformin patients were younger (mean age = 56 vs. 60 years, p < 0.0001) and received lower doses of each drug than patients taking glyburide co-administered with metformin (glyburide mean final dose = 6 vs. 10 mg/day, p < 0.0001; metformin = 893 vs. 1297 mg/day, p < 0.0001). The mean decrease from baseline A1C, adjusted for baseline A1C and dosage, of 2.02% for glyburide/metformin tablets was significantly (p < 0.0001) greater than the decrease of 1.49% for glyburide co-administered with metformin. Glyburide/metformin patients with baseline A1C >/= 8 experienced a significantly (p < 0.0001) greater decrease in A1C of 2.93% compared to 1.92% for glyburide co-administered with metformin. For patients with baseline A1C < 8%, the difference between the A1C responses remained significant, even though the reductions in A1C were smaller for both glyburide/metformin tablets and glyburide co-administered with metformin (0.54% and 0.23%, p = 0.0017). Patients were more adherent with glyburide/metformin tablets (84% vs. 76%, p < 0.0001), though regression analysis indicated that adherence was not a significant predictor of change in A1C. CONCLUSIONS: The lower medication doses delivered by glyburide/metformin tablets provided a significantly greater reduction in A1C than did glyburide co-administered with metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes, especially when baseline A1C >/= 8%.

Adult↗

Metformin reduces weight, centripetal obesity, insulin, leptin, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in nondiabetic, morbidly obese subjects with body mass index greater than 30.

We studied 31 nondiabetic, habitually (> or =5 years) morbidly obese subjects (mean +/- SD body mass index [BMI] 43 +/- 8.7, median 43). Our specific aim was to determine whether metformin (2.55 g/d for 28 weeks) would ameliorate morbid obesity and reduce centripetal obesity; lipid and lipoprotein cholesterol, insulin, and leptin levels; and plasminogen activator inhibitor activity (PAI-Fx), risk factors for coronary heart disease (CHD). The patients were instructed to continue their prestudy dietary and exercise regimens without change. After 2 baseline visits 1 week apart, the 27 women and 4 men began receiving metformin, 2.55 g/d, which was continued for 28 weeks with follow-up visits at study weeks 5, 13, 21, and 29. Daily food intake was recorded by patients for 7 days before visits then reviewed with a dietitian. Kilocalories per day and per week were calculated. At each visit, fasting blood was obtained for measurement of lipid profile, insulin, leptin, and PAI-Fx. The mean +/- SD kilocalories consumed per day, 1,951 +/- 661 at entry, fell by week 29 to 1,719 +/- 493 (P =.014) but did not differ at weeks 5, 13, and 21 from that at week 29 (P >.2). Weight fell from 258 +/- 62 pounds at entry to 245 +/- 54 pounds at week 29 (P =.0001). Girth was reduced from 51.8 +/- 6.2 to 49.2 +/- 4.5 inches (P =.0001). Waist circumference fell from 44.0 +/- 6.4 inches to 41.3 +/- 5.9 (P =.0001). The waist/hip ratio fell from 0.85 +/- 0.09 to 0.84 +/- 0.09 (P =.04). Fasting serum insulin, 28 +/- 15 microU/mL at entry, fell to 21 +/- 11 microU/mL at week 29 (P =.0001), and leptin fell from 79 +/- 33 ng/mL to 55 +/- 27 ng/mL (P =.0001). On metformin, there were linear trends in decrements in weight, girth, waist circumference, waist/hip ratio, insulin, and leptin throughout the study period (P <.007). Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, 126 +/- 34 mg/dL at study entry, fell to 112 +/- 43 mg/dL at week 29 (P =.001), with a linear trend toward decreasing levels throughout (P =.036). By stepwise linear regression, the higher the entry weight, the larger the reduction in weight on metformin therapy (partial R(2) = 31%, P =.001). The greater the reduction in kilocalories consumed per day, the greater the decrease in weight on metformin therapy (partial R(2) = 15%, P =.011). The higher the waist/hip ratio at entry, the greater its reduction on metformin therapy (partial R(2) = 11%, P =.004). The higher the entry serum leptin, the greater its reduction on metformin therapy (partial R(2) = 29%, P =.002). The greater the reduction in insulin on metformin, the greater the reduction in leptin (partial R(2) = 8%, P =.03). The higher the entry PAI-Fx, the greater the reduction in PAI-Fx on metformin (partial R(2) = 43%, P =.0001). Metformin safely and effectively reduces CHD risk factors (weight, fasting insulin, leptin, LDL cholesterol, centripetal obesity) in morbidly obese, nondiabetic subjects with BMI > 30, probably by virtue of its insulin-sensitizing action.

Adult↗

Experiences of a poison center with metformin-associated lactic acidosis.

Metformin is widely used in the treatment of type 2 diabetes, though it is recognized to be associated with the risk of lactic acidosis. A case of pronounced lactic acidosis with cardiac arrest (pH 6.60, lactate 17.5 mmol/l, base excess - 30, standard bicarbonate 2.5 mmol/l, core body temperature 27.8 degrees C) is presented in a 61-year-old woman under metformin therapy. The key laboratory abnormalities observed during the intensive care treatment including repeated hemodialysis are described. The patient showed a complete recovery with residually reduced mental capabilities. Furthermore, an explorative data analysis of our poison center database from 1995 until 2003 concerning metformin was performed. In 109 inquiries for metformin a lactic acidosis (mean pH 6.87 +/- 0.11, mean lactate 20.9 +/- 8.1 mmol/l) was present in 14 cases (9 female, 5 male, average age 57.7 years) with 8 patients under regular metformin therapy and 6 patients who ingested large amounts of metformin to attempt suicide. 4 patients did not survive the severe metabolic disturbance. The present report demonstrates that metformin-associated lactic acidosis is a rare but critical complication of metformin therapy of type 2 diabetes as well as in acute suicidal ingestion of metformin. Early diagnosis and rapid correction of the metabolic acidosis using hemodialysis provides the possibility of a positive outcome even in severe cases. If metformin-associated lactic acidosis is suspected we recommend early involvement of a poison center.

Acidosis, Lactic↗

Transfer of metformin into human milk.

OBJECTIVES: Our objectives were to determine the milk-to-plasma ratio of metformin in lactating mothers and to estimate infant exposure. METHODS: Two studies were performed. In study 1, 3 nursing mothers taking metformin were studied throughout a dosing interval at steady state. Blood samples were obtained from 2 suckling infants. In study 2, 5 healthy lactating women who volunteered to express milk after weaning were given metformin, 500 mg, at weaning and were studied for up to 72 hours. In both studies, areas under the plasma and milk concentration-time curves were estimated, and the milk-to-plasma concentration ratio based on area under the concentration-time curve analysis was derived. The infant dose was calculated by standard methods. RESULTS: In study 1 the milk-to-plasma concentration ratios based on area under the concentration-time curve analysis were 0.37, 0.50, and 0.71. The estimated "doses" of metformin that would be ingested by the breast-fed infants were 0.18%, 0.20%, and 0.21% of the maternal doses, adjusted for weight. In the breast-fed infants, no metformin was detected (n = 2) or adverse effects noted (n = 3). In study 2, the milk-to-plasma concentration ratio based on area under the concentration-time curve analysis was unable to be calculated for 3 subjects because of the unexpected persistence of metformin in milk beyond the study period. For the 2 subjects studied for 72 hours, the milk-to-plasma concentration ratios based on area under the concentration-time curve analysis were 0.27 and 0.47 and the infant doses were 0.11% and 0.25%. The concentration-time profile for metformin in milk in all subjects was unexpectedly flat. CONCLUSIONS: Metformin appears to be "safe" during lactation because of low infant exposure. The unusual concentration-time profile for metformin in milk suggests that the transfer of metformin into milk is not solely dependent on passive diffusion.

Adult↗

Increased insulin-like growth factor-I levels in women with polycystic ovary syndrome, and beneficial effects of metformin therapy.

We aimed to investigate whether metformin would reverse the endocrinopathy of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), allowing resumption of cyclic ovulation and regular menses, and whether metformin causes any change in the serum concentration of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) in patients with PCOS. Fifty-eight women with PCOS participated in the study and received metformin at a dose of 850 mg three times a day (total 2550 mg) for 16 weeks. Serum concentrations of luteinizing hormone, follicle stimulating hormone, estradiol, free testosterone, total testosterone, 17-hydroxyprogesterone, dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate, fasting insulin, IGF-I, sex hormone binding globulin and insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 (IGFBP-1) were evaluated before and after metformin treatment. Patients were divided into two groups as responders and non-responders according to the achievement of regular menstrual periods. The mean IGF-I levels decreased significantly on metformin therapy. After 16 weeks of metformin treatment, 55.17% of PCOS patients achieved regular menses. Only the change in serum levels of progesterone and IGF-I on metformin were statistically significant between responders and non-responders; metformin-induced decremental change in IGF-I levels were greater in responders. In conclusion, we observed that elevated IGF-I levels may have a crucial role in many consequences of PCOS in addition to hyperinsulinemia. By decreasing insulin and IGF-I levels, metformin therapy offers additional beneficial effects in resumption of regular menses. Thus, in PCOS patients with elevated levels of IGF-I, metformin may be considered as an appropriate agent to be used for the regulation of menstrual cycles.

17-alpha-Hydroxyprogesterone↗

Effect of N-benzoyl-D-phenylalanine and metformin on insulin receptors in neonatal streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats: studies on insulin binding to erythrocytes.

In the present study, we focused on the insulin-receptor binding in circulating erythrocytes of N-benzoyl-D-phenylalanine (NBDP) and metformin in neonatal streptozotocin (nSTZ)-induced male Wistar rats. We measured blood levels of glucose and plasma insulin and the binding of insulin to cell-membrane ER receptors in NBDP and metformin-treated diabetic rats. The mean specific binding of insulin to ER was significantly lower in diabetic control rats (DC) (53.0 +/- 3.1%) than in NBDP (62.0 +/- 3.1%), metformin (66.0 +/- 3.3%) and NBDP and metformin combination-treated (72.0 +/- 4.2%) diabetic rats, resulting in a significant decrease in plasma insulin. Scatchard plot analysis demonstrated that the decrease in insulin binding was accounted for by a lower number of insulin receptor sites per cell in DC rats when compared with NBDP and metformin-treated rats. High-affinity (Kd1), low-affinity (Kd2), and kinetic analysis revealed an increase in the average receptor affinity in ER from NBDP and metformin-treated diabetic rats having NBDP 2.0 +/- 0.10 x 10(-10) M(-1) (Kd1); 12.0 +/- 0.85 x 10(-8) M(-1) (Kd2), Metformin 2.1 +/- 0.15 x 10(-10) M(-1) (Kd1); 15.0 +/- 0.80 x 10(-8) M(-1) (Kd2), NBDP and metformin 2.7 +/- 0.10 x 10(-10) M(-1) (Kd1); 20.0 +/- 1.2 x 10(-8) M(-1) (Kd2) compared with 0.9 +/- 0.06 x 10(-10) M(-1) (Kd1); 6.0 +/- 0.30 x 10(-8) M(-1) (Kd2) in DC rats. The results suggest an acute alteration in the number of insulin receptors on ER membranes in nSTZ induced diabetic control rats. Treatment with NBDP along with metformin significantly improved specific insulin binding, with receptor number and affinity binding reaching almost normal non-diabetic levels. The data presented here show that NBDP along with metformin increase total ER membrane insulin binding sites with a concomitant significant increase in plasma insulin.

Animals↗

Effects of metformin on bovine granulosa cells steroidogenesis: possible involvement of adenosine 5' monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK).

In mammals, IGFs are important for the proliferation and steroidogenesis of ovarian cells. Metformin is an insulin sensitizer molecule used for the treatment of the infertility of women with polycystic ovary syndrome. It is, however, unclear whether metformin acts on ovarian cells. Adenosine 5' monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) is involved in metformin action in various cell types. We investigated the effects of metformin on bovine granulosa cell steroidogenesis in response to IGF1 and FSH, and studied AMPK in bovine ovaries. In granulosa cells from small follicles, metformin (10 mM) reduced production of both progesterone and estradiol and decreased the abundance of HSD3B, CYP11A1, and STAR proteins in presence or absence of FSH (10(-8) M) and IGF1 (10(-8) M). In cows, the different subunits of AMPK are expressed in various ovarian cells including granulosa and theca cells, corpus luteum, and oocytes. In bovine granulosa cells from small follicles, metformin, like AICAR (1 mM) a pharmaceutical activator of AMPK, increased phosphorylation of both Thr172 of AMPK alpha and Ser 79 of ACACA (Acetyl-CoA Carboxylase). Both metformin and AICAR treatment reduced progesterone and estradiol secretion in presence or absence of FSH and IGF1. Metformin decreased phosphorylation levels of MAPK3/MAPK1 and MAPK14 in a dose- and time-dependent manner. The adenovirus-mediated production of dominant negative AMPK abolished the effects of metformin on secretion of progesterone and estradiol and on MAPK3/MAPK1 phosphorylation but not on MAPK14 phosphorylation. Thus, in bovine granulosa cells, metformin decreases steroidogenesis and MAPK3/MAPK1 phosphorylation through AMPK activation.

AMP-Activated Protein Kinases↗

Ondansetron and metformin-induced gastrointestinal side effects.

Treatment with metformin is associated with a high incidence of gastrointestinal side effects of unknown mechanism. Metformin is a biguanide derivative, which resembles 5-HT3-receptor agonists in its structure. Activation of 5-HT3 receptors is known to induce nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. In this study, we investigated if the gastrointestinal side effects produced by metformin were antagonized by ondansetron, a selective antagonist of 5-HT3 receptors. Patients experiencing gastrointestinal side effects were randomized to ondansetron (4 mg bid p.o.) or placebo while maintained on metformin (double-blind, parallel-group design). If side effects persisted or worsened, metformin was discontinued and the patient considered a therapeutic failure. Of the 98 subjects treated with metformin, 22 developed side effects to match the study entry criteria. Diarrhea was the most frequent side effect. Subjects were randomized to ondansetron (10/2 F/M, 42.8 +/- 2.3 years, 28.6 +/- 1.1 kg/m2, 2585 +/- 35 mg/d metformin) or placebo (9/1 F/M, 43 +/- 4.3 years, 29.7 +/- 1.8 kg/m2, 2715 +/- 71 mg/d metformin). Ondansetron showed no efficacy against metformin-induced side effects. A comparable number of therapeutic failures were observed in ondansetron (8/12; 66%) and placebo-treated subjects (5/10; 50%) (P<0.1). Mean nausea scores (numeric analog scale) before and during treatment with ondansetron were 6.3 +/- 1 and 6.9 +/- 1 cm, respectively. Nausea scores averaged 7.3 +/- 1.5 and 5.9 +/- 1.5 cm, before and during treatment with placebo (P>0.1). In conclusion, 5-HT3 receptors do not seem to play a role in metformin-induced gastrointestinal side effects.

Adult↗

Reduction of metformin renal tubular secretion by cimetidine in man.

To determine whether cimetidine altered the renal handling of metformin, seven subjects took 0.25 g metformin daily with and without cimetidine 0.4 g twice daily. Blood and urine samples were collected and assayed for metformin, cimetidine and creatinine by h.p.l.c. Cimetidine significantly increased the area under the plasma metformin concentration-time curve by an average of 50% and reduced its renal clearance over 24 h by 27% (P less than 0.008). There was no alteration in the total urinary recovery of metformin when cimetidine was co-administered. The effect of cimetidine on the renal clearance of metformin was time dependent, being significantly reduced up to 6 h following cimetidine. These results appeared to be consistent with competitive inhibition of renal tubular secretion. Cimetidine had no effect on the renal clearance of creatinine, but time-dependent variations in both metformin and creatinine renal clearance were observed. Metformin had no effect on cimetidine disposition. It is concluded that cimetidine inhibits the renal tubular secretion of metformin in man, resulting in higher circulating plasma concentrations. Because of its propensity for causing dose and concentration-dependent adverse effects, the dose of metformin should be reduced when cimetidine is co-prescribed.

Adult↗

Treating insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes with metformin and thiazolidinediones.

Insulin resistance underlies the pathogenesis of hyperglycaemia and cardiovascular disease in most people with type 2 diabetes. Metformin and thiazolidinediones (pioglitazone and rosiglitazone) counter insulin resistance by different cellular mechanisms and with complementary effects, making them suited for use in combination. Metformin exerts a stronger suppression of hepatic glucose output, while thiazolidinediones produce a greater increase in peripheral glucose uptake, enabling metformin-thiazolidinedione combinations to improve glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes with additive efficacy. Basal insulin concentrations are not raised by metformin or thiazolidinediones, so there is minimal risk of hypoglycaemia, and metformin can reduce the weight gain associated with thiazolidinediones. There are overlapping effects of metformin and thiazolidinediones against a range of athero-thrombotic factors and markers. These include decreased plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, reduced platelet aggregation, reductions of several vascular adhesion molecules, and reduced markers of low-grade inflammation such as C-reactive protein. Additionally, thiazolidinediones increase adiponectin and slightly reduce blood pressure. Both metformin and thiazolidinediones can improve components of the lipid profile: thiazolidinediones consistently reduce free fatty acid concentrations and decrease the proportion of small dense low-density-lipoprotein, and pioglitazone also decreases triglycerides. During co-administration, metformin and thiazolidinediones do not interfere with each other's pharmacokinetics, and lower doses of the two agents together can achieve efficacy with fewer side effects. Metformin-thiazolidinedione combinations require attention to the precautions for both agents, especially renal, cardiac and hepatic status. Thus, metformin and thiazolidinediones can be used in combination to address the hyperglycaemia and vascular risk in type 2 diabetes.

Body Weight↗

The effect of obesity on glycaemic response to metformin or sulphonylureas in Type 2 diabetes.

AIMS: In treating Type 2 diabetes (T2DM), UK guidelines recommend metformin in obese and overweight patients, and either sulphonylureas or metformin in normal weight patients. Although other factors influence prescribing choice, a key objective in treating T2DM is to lower plasma glucose. There is little data on how glycaemic response to oral agents varies with body mass index (BMI). Therefore, we assessed current prescribing practice and effect of BMI on glycaemic response to sulphonylureas and metformin in a large population T2DM cohort. METHODS: BMI was determined in 3856 T2DM patients on sulphonylurea or metformin monotherapy in 2001-2002. Patients were identified from the Diabetes Audit and Research in Tayside, Scotland (DARTS) database. In a linear regression, the effect of BMI and other confounders on drug response was assessed in 2064 treatment-naïve patients commencing sulphonylureas or metformin between 1994 and 2002. RESULTS: In 2001-2002, metformin was more likely to be used in obese than non-obese patients: 13% normal weight, 33.6% overweight and 62.1% obese patients were treated with metformin. Glycaemic response to sulphonylureas was not influenced by BMI (P = 0.81). Metformin was more effective in lowering glucose in those with a lower BMI (r = -0.02, P = 0.02), although the clinical impact of this was small. The HbA(1c) reduction in non-obese patients was similar to that in obese patients (1.46% vs. 1.34%, P = 0.11). CONCLUSIONS: Glycaemic response to metformin in non-obese and obese patients is similar, suggesting that an individual's BMI should not influence the choice of oral agent. Given the non-glycaemia-related benefits of metformin, it should be used in more non-obese patients than is current practice in Tayside, Scotland.

Aged↗

Effect of subchronic metformin treatment on macronutrient selection in genetically obese Zucker rats.

Metformin has been particularly recommended to be used in obese type 2 diabetic patients because of its weight decreasing and serum lipid profile normalizing effects. In the present study the effects of subchronic metformin treatment on macronutrient selection, weight gain and plasma insulin and glucose were investigated in 20 genetically obese male Zucker rats which were maintained on a free-feeding self-selection paradigm with three pure macronutrient diets of carbohydrate, fat and protein. Half of the rats were given metformin hydrochloride 320 mg/kg/day up to 18 days in drinking water. The other half of the animals received normal drinking water as a control. Metformin treatment significantly reduced 24 hr carbohydrate (P < 0.01), fat (P < 0.001) and protein (P < 0.01) intake. The proportion of fat of the total consumed energy was significantly increased by metformin (P < 0.01) while the proportion of protein was decreased (P < 0.05). In hunger stimulated feeding experiment metformin decreased selectively protein intake (P < 0.01). Changes in macronutrient selection were associated with reduced body weight gain in metformin treated rats (P < 0.001). Metformin markedly reduced the hyperinsulinaemia (P < 0.01) and plasma glucose levels (P < 0.05), which suggests improved glucose tolerance after metformin treatment. It is concluded that subchronic metformin treatment can modify the composition of energy intake in a macronutrient selective manner.

Animals↗

Metformin in polycystic ovary syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of metformin in improving clinical and biochemical features of polycystic ovary syndrome. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: Randomised controlled trials that investigated the effect of metformin compared with either placebo or no treatment, or compared with an ovulation induction agent. SELECTION OF STUDIES: 13 trials were included for analysis, including 543 women with polycystic ovary syndrome that was defined by using biochemical or ultrasound evidence. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Pregnancy and ovulation rates. Secondary outcomes of clinical and biochemical features of polycystic ovary syndrome. RESULTS: Meta-analysis showed that metformin is effective in achieving ovulation in women with polycystic ovary syndrome, with odds ratios of 3.88 (95% confidence interval 2.25 to 6.69) for metformin compared with placebo and 4.41 (2.37 to 8.22) for metformin and clomifene compared with clomifene alone. An analysis of pregnancy rates shows a significant treatment effect for metformin and clomifene (odds ratio 4.40, 1.96 to 9.85). Metformin has an effect in reducing fasting insulin concentrations, blood pressure, and low density lipoprotein cholesterol. We found no evidence of any effect on body mass index or waist:hip ratio. Metformin was associated with a higher incidence of nausea, vomiting, and other gastrointestinal disturbance. CONCLUSIONS: Metformin is an effective treatment for anovulation in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Its choice as a first line agent seems justified, and there is some evidence of benefit on variables of the metabolic syndrome. No data are available regarding the safety of metformin in long term use in young women and only limited data on its safety in early pregnancy. It should be used as an adjuvant to general lifestyle improvements and not as a replacement for increased exercise and improved diet.

Blood Pressure↗