Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Linezolid”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 145 records · Page 8Linked to original sources
PubMed2004

Enterococcus faecalis resistant to linezolid: case series and review of the literature.

Reports of linezolid resistance among Enterococcus faecalis have been relatively rare. We describe three patients with linezolid-resistant strains of E. faecalis, discovered after the patients had received long courses (> 30 days) of linezolid therapy. All strains contained the G2576U mutation in 23S rRNA. A literature review revealed one other case in the United States and three cases in Europe; all involved patients who had received long courses of therapy. It appears that recent or extended linezolid therapy may be a risk factor for development of resistant E. faecalis. In patients who have recently been treated with linezolid and have an identified new systemic enterococcal isolate, linezolid sensitivity should be verified as soon as possible to guide therapy. This strategy also should be considered for patients with a breakthrough enterococcal isolate during linezolid therapy.

Acetamides↗
PubMed2006

Bell's palsy associated with linezolid therapy: case report and review of neuropathic adverse events.

Bell's palsy is one of the most common neurologic disorders affecting the seventh cranial nerve. Several disease states have been associated with facial paralysis. Drugs, however, have been rarely implicated as an etiology. We describe a 49-year-old man who developed peripheral facial paralysis after 3 weeks of linezolid therapy, along with recurrence of symptoms on rechallenge. He had insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and a longstanding history of bilateral diabetes-related foot problems. After hospitalization, debridement, and vancomycin therapy for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus osteomyelitis, the patient was discharged to home with oral linezolid therapy. On day 23 of linezolid therapy, he developed signs and symptoms that were consistent with Bell's palsy. Linezolid was discontinued; the Bell's palsy gradually improved, with complete resolution occurring at month 3. On rechallenge with linezolid for recurrent osteomyelitis, the patient developed a second episode of Bell's palsy within a similar time frame as in the first episode. Assessment of causality using the Naranjo adverse drug reaction probability scale revealed a probable relationship between this adverse drug event and linezolid therapy. Clinicians should be aware that Bell's palsy may be another neuropathic adverse effect associated with linezolid.

Acetamides↗
PubMed2007

Mild serotonin syndrome associated with concurrent linezolid and fluoxetine.

PURPOSE: A case of serotonin syndrome that developed during concurrent linezolid and fluoxetine is presented. SUMMARY: A 23-year-old white male patient was originally admitted to receive intravenous chemotherapy for acute myelogenous leukemia. He had a history of intravenous amphetamine abuse, hepatitis B virus infection, hepatitis C virus infection, depression, and bipolar disorder. The patient's routine medications before admission included methadone, fluoxetine, voriconazole, transdermal nicotine patch, lorazepam, and quetiapine. The patient developed persistent neutropenia and complications from chemotherapy, including mild mucositis. Despite treatment with levofloxacin, acyclovir, and voriconazole, the patient developed high fevers. Levofloxacin was discontinued and aztreonam and vancomycin were started. After a blood culture revealed that the bacteria were likely vancomycin resistant, vancomycin was discontinued and linezolid was initiated. Nine hours later, the patient began complaining of severe pain in his abdomen. After a total of four doses of linezolid, the patient reported further discomfort. Two days after linezolid initiation, a health care team member identified the interaction between fluoxetine and linezolid as the cause of the patient's symptoms, and linezolid was discontinued. All symptoms resolved within 48 hours. While resolution generally occurs within 24-48 hours after discontinuing the offending agent, the time to resolution may be delayed if the agent has a long half-life or active metabolites, in which case admission to an intensive care unit is recommended. Cyproheptadine and chlorpromazine may also be used to treat symptoms. CONCLUSION: Serotonin syndrome developed in a patient taking concurrent linezolid and fluoxetine.

Acetamides↗
PubMed2004

Linezolid-associated peripheral neuropathy.

Linezolid is the first drug in a new class of synthetic antimicrobials, the oxazolidinones, to be approved by the Food and Drug Administration. Linezolid is active against methicillin- and vancomycin-resistant gram-positive microorganisms. We describe 2 patients who developed peripheral neuropathy after prolonged treatment with linezolid. Linezolid-associated peripheral neuropathy has not been well documented. Most reported cases of linezolid-associated peripheral neuropathy have occurred in patients who took linezolid for a period longer than the recommended 28 or fewer days. Health care providers must be alert to the potential for serious adverse effects associated with linezolid use, including peripheral neuropathy.

Acetamides↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Compatibility and stability of linezolid injection admixed with three cephalosporin antibiotics.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the physical compatibility and chemical stability of linezolid (Zyvox-Pharmacia) 200 mg/100 mL admixed with cefazolin sodium 1 gram, ceftazidime 2 grams, and ceftriaxone sodium 1 gram for 7 days at 4 degrees C and 23 degrees C. DESIGN: Controlled experimental trial. SETTING: Laboratory. INTERVENTIONS: The test samples were prepared by adding the required amount of the cephalosporin antibiotic to bags of linezolid injection 200 mg/100 mL. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Physical stability and chemical stability based on drug concentrations initially and after 1, 3, 5, and 7 days of storage at 4 degrees C and 23 degrees C protected from light. RESULTS: All of the linezolid admixtures with cephalosporins were clear when viewed in normal fluorescent room light and with a Tyndall beam. Measured turbidity and particulate content were low and exhibited little change. The cefazolin sodium-containing samples were colorless throughout the study. The admixtures with ceftazidime and ceftriaxone sodium had a slight yellow tinge initially, and the room temperature samples became a frank yellow color after 5 days. The refrigerated samples did not change color. High-performance liquid chromatography analysis found little or no loss of linezolid in any sample stored at either temperature throughout the study. Cefazolin sodium and ceftazidime in the linezolid admixtures at 4 degrees C remained stable for 7 days, but at 23 degrees C cefazolin sodium was stable for 3 days and ceftazidime for only 24 hours before cephalosporin decomposition exceeded 10%. Ceftriaxone sodium was less stable in the admixtures; 10% loss occurred in 3 days at 4 degrees C and more than 20% loss occurred in 24 hours at 23 degrees C. CONCLUSION: Admixtures of linezolid 200 mg/100 mL with cefazolin sodium 1 gram and ceftazidime 2 grams were physically compatible and chemically stable for at least 7 days stored at 4 degrees C protected from light and for 3 days and 1 day, respectively, at 23 degrees C protected from light. Admixtures of linezolid with ceftriaxone sodium 1 gram exhibited a rapid rate of cephalosporin loss at 23 degrees C, which precludes admixture of the two drugs.

Acetamides↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Compatibility and stability of linezolid injection admixed with aztreonam or piperacillin sodium.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the physical compatibility and chemical stability of linezolid (Zyvox-Pharmacia) 200 mg/100 mL admixed with aztreonam (Azactam-Squibb) 2 grams and separately with piperacillin sodium (Pipracil-Lederle) 3 grams over 7 days at 4 degrees C and 23 degrees C. DESIGN: Controlled experimental trial. SETTING: Laboratory. INTERVENTIONS: Test samples were prepared by adding the required amount of aztreonam or piperacillin sodium to separate bags of linezolid injection 200 mg/100 mL. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Physical compatibility and chemical stability based on drug concentrations initially and after 1, 3, 5, and 7 days of storage at 4 degrees C and 23 degrees C. RESULTS: All of the linezolid admixtures with aztreonam and with piperacillin sodium were clear when viewed in normal fluorescent room light and with a Tyndall beam. Measured turbidity and particulate content were low and exhibited little change throughout the study at both storage temperatures. High-performance liquid chromatography analysis found little or no loss of linezolid in any sample stored at either temperature throughout the study. Aztreonam in the linezolid admixtures was stable for 7 days, exhibiting less than 5% loss at 4 degrees C and 9% loss at 23 degrees C. Piperacillin sodium in the linezolid admixtures was stable for 7 days at 4 degrees C, exhibiting no loss, but was stable for only 3 days at 23 degrees C with losses of about 5%. Losses had increased to 9% to 12% after 5 days of storage at room temperature. CONCLUSION: Admixtures of linezolid 200 mg/100 mL with aztreonam 2 grams or piperacillin sodium 3 grams were physically compatible and chemically stable for at least 7 days stored at 4 degrees C and for 7 days or 3 days, respectively, at 23 degrees C.

Acetamides↗
PubMed2003

[Linezolid for the treatment of nosocomial infections after cardiac surgery].

Clinical and bacteriological efficacy of linezolid in the treatment of cardiosurgical patients with various localization nosocomial infections due to problem grampositive cocci was estimated. The group included 10 patients: children at the age 3 months to 12 years (n = 3) and adults at the age of 17 to 65 years (n = 7) with infectious complications such as infectious endocarditis (n = 4), pneumonia (n = 2), wound infection (n = 3) and sepsis (n = 1). All the patients isolated MR staphylococci. The use of glycopeptides was not possible in 6 patients because of vancomycin intolerance (n = 1), renal insufficiency (n = 1) and failure of the previous vancomycin therapy (n = 4). To all the patients linezolid was administered per os (tablets or suspension) or intravenously (infusion solution) in doses of 600 mg twice a day (1200 mg a day) for the adults and 10 mg/kg body weight every 12 hours (20 mg/kg body weight a day) for the children. Linezolid monotherapy was applied to 2 patients. 8 patients were treated with linezolid in combination with some other antibiotics. By the clinical findings the positive dynamics confirmed by thermometry and hemograms was observed in 8 patients beginning from the 4th day of the linezolid use. Eradication of MR staphylococci from the blood, sputum and wounds was stated in all 10 patients. No toxic or adverse reactions were noted. It was concluded that linezolid is an optimal alternative to vancomycin especially when the use of the latter is not possible. No nephrotoxic effects of linezolid provided its recommendation as a drug of choice in the treatment of patients with renal disturbances, including polyorganic insufficiency.

Acetamides↗
PubMed1997

In vitro activity of linezolid and eperezolid, two novel oxazolidinone antimicrobial agents, against anaerobic bacteria.

Linezolid (formerly U-100766) and eperezolid (formerly U-100592) are novel oxazolidinone antimicrobial agents that are active against multi-drug-resistant staphylococci, streptococci, enterococci, corynebacteria, and mycobacteria. Preliminary studies also demonstrated that the compounds inhibited some test strains of anaerobic bacteria. Therefore, we extended the in vitro evaluation of these agents to include a total of 54 different anaerobic species. Minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) values were determined using a standard agar dilution method for 143 anaerobic bacterial isolates. Eperezolid and linezolid demonstrated potent activity against the anaerobic Gram-positive organisms with most MIC values in the range of 0.25-4 microg/mL. Viridans streptococci demonstrated MICs of 1-2 microg/mL; Peptostreptococcus species and Propionibacterium species were inhibited by </=0.25-1 microg/mL. Clostridial species were generally susceptible to the oxazolidinones (MICs of </=0.25-8 microg/mL); however, seven strains of Clostridium difficile with linezolid MICs of 16 microg/mL or greater were detected. Against the anaerobic Gram-negative organisms, linezolid was more potent than eperezolid, especially for Bacteroides species. Linezolid inhibited most bacteroides in the range of 2-8 microg/mL, while eperezolid was generally two- to eight-fold less active. Linezolid and eperezolid both demonstrated potent activity against Fusobacterium species,Mobiluncus species,Prevotella intermedia, and Porphyromonas asaccharolytica (MICs of </=0.25-0.5 microg/mL). Overall, the oxazolidinones demonstrated a significant level of activity against a number of clinically-important anaerobic bacterial species. Linezolid may potentially provide a broader spectrum of anaerobic coverage than eperezolid due to its greater activity against Bacteroides species.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2000

Linezolid: a new antibiotic.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration recently approved linezolid for the treatment of patients with methicillin-resistant staphylococcal and vancomycin-resistant enterococcal infections. This oxazolidinone antibacterial agent represents the first approved antibiotic of a new structural class in 35 years. Linezolid is a synthetic compound that acts by inhibiting the initiation complex formation in bacterial protein synthesis, a mechanism of action distinct from other commercially available antibiotics. Thus, cross-resistance between linezolid and other current antimicrobial agents has not been demonstrated to date. Linezolid has a wide spectrum of in vitro activity against Gram-positive organisms, including methicillin-resistant staphylococci, penicillin-resistant pneumococci and vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Some anaerobes, such as Clostridium spp., Peptostreptococcus spp. and Prevotella spp. are also susceptible to linezolid. In addition, linezolid has exhibited good efficacy in experimental animal models of acute otitis media, endocarditis and meningitis due to many common aerobic Gram-positive bacteria. In clinical trials involving hospitalized patients with skin/soft tissue infections, community-acquired pneumonia and serious Gram-positive bacterial infections, linezolid appeared to be an effective treatment option, comparable in efficacy to vancomycin.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2003

Treating foot infections in diabetic patients: a randomized, multicenter, open-label trial of linezolid versus ampicillin-sulbactam/amoxicillin-clavulanate.

Foot infections in diabetic patients are predominantly caused by gram-positive cocci, many of which are now antibiotic resistant. Because linezolid is active against these pathogens, we compared the efficacy and safety of intravenous and oral formulations with that of intravenous ampicillin-sulbactam and intravenous and oral amoxicillin-clavulanate given for 7-28 days in a randomized, open-label, multicenter study of all types of foot infection in diabetic patients (ratio of linezolid to comparator drug recipients, 2:1). Among 371 patients, the clinical cure rates associated with linezolid and the comparators were statistically equivalent overall (81% vs. 71%, respectively) but were significantly higher for linezolid-treated patients with infected foot ulcers (81% vs. 68%; P=.018) and for patients without osteomyelitis (87% vs. 72%; P=.003). Cure rates were comparable for inpatients and outpatients and for both oral and intravenous formulations. Drug-related adverse events were significantly more common in the linezolid group, but they were generally mild and reversible. Linezolid was at least as effective as aminopenicillin/beta-lactamase inhibitors for treating foot infections in diabetic patients.

Acetamides↗
PubMed2005

Linezolid versus vancomycin in treatment of complicated skin and soft tissue infections.

Skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) are a common cause of morbidity in both the community and the hospital. An SSTI is classified as complicated if the infection has spread to the deeper soft tissues, if surgical intervention is necessary, or if the patient has a comorbid condition hindering treatment response (e.g., diabetes mellitus or human immunodeficiency virus). The purpose of this study was to compare linezolid to vancomycin in the treatment of suspected or proven methicillin-resistant gram-positive complicated SSTIs (CSSTIs) requiring hospitalization. This was a randomized, open-label, comparator-controlled, multicenter, multinational study that included patients with suspected or proven methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections that involved substantial areas of skin or deeper soft tissues, such as cellulitis, abscesses, infected ulcers, or burns (<10% of total body surface area). Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive linezolid (600 mg) every 12 h either intravenously (i.v.) or orally or vancomycin (1 g) every 12 h i.v. In the intent-to-treat population, 92.2% and 88.5% of patients treated with linezolid and vancomycin, respectively, were clinically cured at the test-of-cure (TOC) visit (P=0.057). Linezolid outcomes (124/140 patients or 88.6%) were superior to vancomycin outcomes (97/145 patients or 66.9%) at the TOC visit for patients with MRSA infections (P<0.001). Drug-related adverse events were reported in similar numbers in both the linezolid and the vancomycin arms of the trial. The results of this study demonstrate that linezolid therapy is well tolerated, equivalent to vancomycin in treating CSSTIs, and superior to vancomycin in the treatment of CSSTIs due to MRSA.

Acetamides↗
PubMed2004

Clinical cure and survival in Gram-positive ventilator-associated pneumonia: retrospective analysis of two double-blind studies comparing linezolid with vancomycin.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of baseline variables, including treatment, on clinical cure and survival rates in patients with Gram-positive, ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of two randomized, double-blind studies. SETTING: Multinational study with 134 sites. PATIENTS: 544 patients with suspected Gram-positive VAP, including 264 with documented Gram-positive VAP and 91 with methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) VAP. INTERVENTIONS: Linezolid 600 mg or vancomycin 1 g every 12 h for 7-21 days, each with aztreonam. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Clinical cure rates assessed 12-28 days after the end of therapy and excluding indeterminate or missing outcomes significantly favored linezolid in the Gram-positive and MRSA subsets. Logistic regression showed that linezolid was an independent predictor of clinical cure with odds ratios of 1.8 for all patients, 2.4 for Gram-positive VAP, and 20.0 for MRSA VAP. Kaplan-Meier survival rates favored linezolid in the MRSA subset. Logistic regression showed that linezolid was an independent predictor of survival with odds ratios of 1.6 for all patients, 2.6 for Gram-positive VAP, and 4.6 for MRSA VAP. CONCLUSIONS: Initial linezolid therapy was associated with significantly better clinical cure and survival rates than was initial vancomycin therapy in patients with MRSA VAP.

Acetamides↗
PubMed2002

Age and sex effects on the pharmacokinetics of linezolid.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the possible effects of age and sex on the pharmacokinetics of linezolid in healthy volunteers. METHODS: A single 600-mg dose of linezolid was administered orally to young (18-40 years) and elderly (> or =65 years) healthy males and females. Blood and urine samples were collected until 48 h after dosing and assayed for linezolid concentrations using a validated high-performance liquid chromatography method. Pharmacokinetic parameters were assessed using noncompartmental methods. Comparisons of the pharmacokinetic parameters for each age and sex group were performed using a two-way analysis of variance model. Pairwise comparisons were done using least-square means analysis. RESULTS: Peak plasma drug concentrations occurred within 1.5 h after linezolid administration for males and females in both age groups. However, the maximum concentration achieved differed significantly between males and females. There was no significant difference between males and females or young and elderly for mean apparent elimination rate constant or half-life. There was no difference in mean apparent oral clearance (CLPO) between the young and elderly; however, there was a significant difference between males and females. Mean CLPO for females was approximately 37% less than mean CLPO for males when not corrected for body weight. Correcting for differences in weight reduced this difference to approximately 20%. Overall, females had a slightly lower volume of distribution than males, but this was not affected by the age of subjects. CONCLUSIONS: A dose adjustment based on age and sex is not warranted due to the wide range of linezolid concentrations that are well tolerated and the relative small difference in linezolid disposition between males and females.

Acetamides↗
PubMed2002

Emerging linezolid-resistant Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium isolated from two Austrian patients in the same intensive care unit.

Of two patients in the same intensive care unit who were treated with linezolid, one yielded linezolid-resistant Enterococcus faecalis, whereas the other yielded linezolid-resistant Enterococcus faecium. In each case, molecular typing indicated that the resistant isolates were related to linezolid-susceptible isolates from the same patient, but differed from them by the same G2576U ribosomal RNA mutation. This is the first clinical case report of emerging resistance to linezolid among Enterococcus faecalis and also the first report of resistance involving vancomycin-susceptible rather than vancomycin-resistant enterococci. The linezolid-resistant isolates showed cross-resistance to the experimental oxazolidinone AZD2563, suggesting that oxazolidinone resistance might be a class effect.

Acetamides↗
PubMed2005

Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of linezolid versus teicoplanin in bacteremia by Gram-positive microorganisms.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the efficiency of linezolid versus teicoplanin in the treatment of bacteremia produced by Gram-positive microorganisms through a pharmacoeconomic analysis based on clinical results obtained from a previous clinical trial. METHODS: We applied an analysis of cost-effectiveness elaborated through a pharmacoeconomic model. We defined each unit of effectiveness as 'each successfully cured of infections with bacteremia.' We used the program Pharma-Decision (version Hospital 1.1) that allows to build interactive pharmacoeconomic models. Effectiveness data of both antibiotics were obtained from a published clinical trial, while resources consumed were obtained from the same source and from a consensus provided by a local expert panel. Only direct costs were included in the analysis without taking into consideration indirect costs. The perspective chosen was hospital assistance and the time horizon was set to 28 days. All costs are expressed in Euros. RESULTS: Linezolid demonstrated a better clinical outcome with less associated costs compared to teicoplanin (88.5 versus 56.7% of cured patients and 5,557.04 versus 6,327.43 per treated patient, respectively), thus resulting in a lower cost-effectiveness ratio for linezolid versus teicoplanin (6,279.1 versus 11,159.5 per cured patient with a 95% CI of 5,960.2-6,510.4 and 10,865.2-12,647.3, respectively) which results in a the dominant position for linezolid. The sensitivity analysis showed that linezolid was always the most efficient option even when modifying the value of variables with higher uncertainty. CONCLUSIONS: Linezolid is a more efficient option than teicoplanin because it presents higher rate of effectiveness with lower consumption of resources, thus being a dominant alternative in the treatment of Gram-positive infection with bacteremia.

Acetamides↗
PubMed2004

Effects of linezolid on staphylococcal adherence versus time of treatment.

Staphylococcus epidermidis has emerged as a major nosocomial pathogen that is often associated with infections of indwelling medical devices. Microbial adhesion to implanted foreign materials is a prerequisite for establishing infection. We studied the time-dependent anti-adhesion effects of linezolid and vancomycin on three S. epidermidis clinical isolates. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values were identical for both agents for all three isolates (2 mg/l). Bacterial suspensions were added to polystyrene wells and treated with 0.5-4 times the MIC of linezolid or vancomycin at 0, 2, 4 or 6 h post-inoculation. Supra-inhibitory (2 and 4 x MIC) and inhibitory (MIC) concentrations of linezolid demonstrated potent anti-adhesion activity following 2 and 4 h deferred treatments. Even at sub-inhibitory concentrations (0.5 x MIC), suppression of staphylococcal adherence to polystyrene was still evident in most cultures. Linezolid at two and four times the MIC also exerted significant inhibitory effects in cultures that had been treated with a 6-h delay. Supra-inhibitory and inhibitory concentrations of vancomycin administered 2 h post-infection appeared equally effective as linezolid. However, sub-inhibitory concentrations of vancomycin showed minimal or no activity against bacterial adhesion. When vancomycin treatments were delayed by 4 h, only concentrations above the MIC prevented adherence. Linezolid has promising in vitro anti-adhesion activity that merits further studies to determine its role in the management of foreign-body infections.

Acetamides↗
PubMed2006

The effect of food on plasma and tissue concentrations of linezolid after multiple doses.

In the present pilot study we investigated the effect of food ingestion on target site pharmacokinetics of linezolid, the first clinically approved oxazolidinone. For this purpose we determined free concentrations of linezolid at steady state in the interstitial space fluid of skeletal muscle and subcutaneous adipose tissue under fasting and non-fasting conditions in healthy volunteers (n = 9) by means of in vivo microdialysis. Ingestion of food led to a marked delay in the time to reach the peak concentration (T(max)), whereas the area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC(0-24 h)) remained unchanged. These data suggest that the rate of linezolid absorption is decreased by food intake. However, the overall extent of linezolid absorption and the distribution of linezolid were not affected. Tissue levels of linezolid appeared sufficiently high to eradicate pathogens with a minimum inhibitory concentration of <or= 4 mg/L.

Acetamides↗
PubMed2006

Efficacy and safety of linezolid in multidrug resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB)--a report of ten cases.

OBJECTIVES: Multidrug resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) is an increasing problem in many parts of the world and in Norway the increase has been substantial since 1998. New therapies for MDR-TB have not been introduced since the fluoroquinolones in the 1970s. The cure rate of this disease has been reported to be lower than for non-drug resistant TB, and the use of new experimental drugs in combination therapy is warranted. METHODS: Ten consecutive patients with culture proven MDR-TB were treated with the novel antibiotic drug linezolid in combination regimens for 6-40 (median 17) weeks and followed up 11-50 (median 24) months after end of treatment. All strains were sensitive to linezolid with MIC<4 mg/l. Treatment was given as direct observed therapy (DOT) and sputum cultures, blood chemistry and neurologic examination were undertaken on a regular basis. RESULTS: Nine patients were cured, one patient with poor adherence to treatment and advanced AIDS died. Seven of 10 patients experienced serious adverse events, which led to withdrawal of linezolid in all seven. Six patients developed peripheral neuropathy and five patients bone marrow depression, blood transfusions were given to three patients and in all five patients bone marrow function normalized after cessation of linezolid. Peripheral neuropathy was not fully reversed in all patients. CONCLUSION: Linezolid seems highly active in combination treatment of MDR-TB. Cultures became negative 10-37 days after the introduction of the drug. However, peripheral neuropathy and bone marrow depression led to linezolid withdrawal in seven patients, and neuropathy may not be fully reversible in all patients.

Acetamides↗