Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Fluvoxamine”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 145 records · Page 8Linked to original sources

Characterization of the anxiolytic-like effects of fluvoxamine, milnacipran and risperidone in mice using the conditioned fear stress paradigm.

It has been known that rodents exhibit the immobility when tested in the same environment in which they had been previously exposed to aversive stimuli. This behavior is called conditioned fear stress-induced freezing behavior, and has been used as a model of anxiety. Using this animal model, the present study tried to characterize the anxiolytic-like effects of fluvoxamine, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, milnacipran, a serotonin noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor and risperidone, an atypical antipsychotic in mice. Fluvoxamine (1.25-10 mg/kg, intraperitoneally (i.p.)) and milnacipran (0.5-4 mg/kg, i.p.) each dose-dependently and significantly suppressed the conditioned fear stress-induced freezing behavior in mice, an indicator of anxiety, and milnacipran had a weaker effect than fluvoxamine. While risperidone also significantly suppressed freezing behavior at a low dose (0.01 mg/kg, i.p.), a high dose (0.04 mg/kg, i.p.) decreased spontaneous motor activity. On the contrary, sulpiride, a typical antipsychotic (2-8 mg/kg, i.p.), did not affect freezing behavior. In a combination study, the suppressive effect of a low dose of risperidone (0.01 mg/kg, i.p.) on freezing behavior was significantly antagonized by the co-administration of low/middle doses of fluvoxamine (1.25 and 2.5 mg/kg, i.p.), whereas a high dose of fluvoxamine (10 mg/kg, i.p.) was unaffected. Additionally, the co-administration of milnacipran (0.5-2 mg/kg, i.p.) also tended to inhibit the suppressive effect of risperidone (0.01 mg/kg, i.p.). These findings indicate that fluvoxamine, milnacipran and risperidone may each be clinically effective at treating anxiety disorders, but their effects may be attenuated in combination with other medications.

Animals↗

Antidepressant-like effect of coadministration of sulpiride and fluvoxamine in mice.

We have recently reported that coadministration of sulpiride, an antipsychotic drug, and fluvoxamine, a selective serotonin (5-HT) reuptake inhibitor, selectively increases in vivo dopamine release in the prefrontal cortex. This study examined the effects of coadministration of these drugs on duration of immobility in the tail suspension test using mice. Neither sulpiride (3 or 10 mg/kg) nor fluvoxamine (10 or 20 mg/kg) alone affected immobility time, whereas coadministration significantly reduced immobility time. WAY 100635, a 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonist, did not affect the effects of sulpiride and fluvoxamine coadministration, but reduced immobility time in combination with fluvoxamine (20 mg/kg). A high dose of fluvoxamine alone (60 mg/kg) also reduced immobility time. These results suggest that the antidepressant-like effects of fluvoxamine in combination with sulpiride or WAY 100635 in the tail suspension test are mediated by the activation of dopamine or 5-HT systems, respectively.

Animals↗

Low-dose risperidone augmentation of fluvoxamine treatment in obsessive-compulsive disorder: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

According to previous data, the addition of risperidone in obsessive-compulsive patients refractory to serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SRIs) is shown to be a safe and effective treatment strategy. The aims of our study were to evaluate the efficacy of risperidone addition, in comparison to placebo, in fluvoxamine-refractory obsessive-compulsive patients and to investigate whether risperidone could boost the efficacy of fluvoxamine in fluvoxamine-responder patients. Subjects were 45 obsessive-compulsive inpatients, consecutively recruited at the Department of Neurosciences at the San Raffaele Hospital, Milan. Thirty-nine patients completed the study. All patients received 12 weeks of a standardized open-label fluvoxamine monotherapy and then continued for 6 weeks with placebo or risperidone in a double-blind design. Results showed a significant effect of risperidone addition, at the end of the double-blind phase (18th week), only for fluvoxamine-refractory patients. Five patients on risperidone (50%) and two (20%) on placebo became responders, with a Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) decrease > or =35%. Risperidone was generally well tolerated, except for a mild transient sedation and a mild increase in appetite. This preliminary study suggests that even very low (0.5 mg) risperidone doses are effective in OC patients who were nonresponders to a standardized treatment with fluvoxamine.

Adolescent↗

Effects of chronic fluvoxamine on ethanol- and food-maintained behaviors.

Acute treatment with fluvoxamine reduces responding for ethanol more than responding for food. However, pharmacotherapy for alcoholism is likely to require chronic treatment. These experiments were performed to assess the effects of chronic fluvoxamine on ethanol- and food-maintained behaviors. Effects of chronic fluvoxamine (10 and 17.8 mg/kg/dayx30 days) on ethanol- and food-maintained responding were compared to responding during saline treatment in four Sprague-Dawley rats responding for ethanol and food under a multiple fixed-ratio 5, fixed-ratio 5 schedule. In two subjects, chronic fluvoxamine reduced ethanol-maintained responding more than food-maintained responding; however this effect was transient. In another subject, treatment persistently decreased food-maintained responding relative to ethanol-maintained responding. Finally, in one subject, fluvoxamine nonspecifically disrupted responding for food and ethanol. Similar to results in humans, outbred Sprague-Dawley rats had differential responses to chronic fluvoxamine. The effect was transient in rats that responded favorably (greater reduction of ethanol relative to food responding), while response reductions persisted throughout treatment in rats that responded unfavorably (greater reduction of food relative to ethanol or nonspecific reductions).

Animals↗

Fluvoxamine, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, exerts its antiallodynic effects on neuropathic pain in mice via 5-HT2A/2C receptors.

There is an association between depression and chronic pain, and some antidepressants exert antinociceptive effects in humans and laboratory animals. We examined the effects of fluvoxamine, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, on mechanical allodynia and its mechanism of action in the mouse chronic pain model, which was prepared by partially ligating the sciatic nerve. The antiallodynic effect was measured using the von Frey test. Fluvoxamine produced antiallodynic effects following both systemic and intrathecal administration. In 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)-depleted mice, prepared by intracerebroventricular injection of 5,7-dihyroxytryptamine, the fluvoxamine-induced antiallodynic effect was significantly attenuated. The antiallodynic effects of systemic fluvoxamine were also reduced by both systemic and intrathecal administration of ketanserin, a 5-HT2A/2C receptor antagonist. In addition, fluvoxamine also induced antinociceptive effect in the acute paw pressure test, and this effect was antagonized by the 5-HT3 receptor antagonist granisetron. These results indicate that fluvoxamine exerts its antiallodynic effects on neuropathic pain via descending 5-HT fibers and spinal 5-HT2A or 5-HT2C receptors, and the antinociception on acute mechanical pain via 5-HT3 receptors.

Analysis of Variance↗

Disposition of fluvoxamine in humans is determined by the polymorphic CYP2D6 and also by the CYP1A2 activity.

BACKGROUND: Fluvoxamine is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor used widely in the treatment of depression and other psychiatric diseases, but little is known about the specific isozymes involved in its metabolism. This study investigated the relationship between fluvoxamine disposition and the polymorphic CYP2D6 and the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (as contained in cigarette smoke) inducible CYP1A2. METHODS: Fluvoxamine (50 mg orally) was given to 10 extensive metabolizers and four poor metabolizers of debrisoquin, and concentrations were assessed in plasma by high performance liquid chromatography. Five of the extensive metabolizers and one of the poor metabolizers were smokers of more than 10 cigarettes per day. The CYP1A2 activity was determined by means of a urinary caffeine test. RESULTS: Compared with nonsmoking extensive metabolizers, nonsmoking poor metabolizers had a statistically significant (p = 0.02, Mann-Whitney U test) about twofold higher maximum plasma concentration, longer half-life, and fivefold lower oral clearance of fluvoxamine. The oral clearance of fluvoxamine correlated to the CYP1A2 index in the 14 subjects (rs = 0.58; p < 0.05; Spearman rank correlation). CONCLUSION: The disposition of fluvoxamine in humans is associated with the polymorphic CYP2D6 activity, but CYP1A2 also seems to be involved.

Adrenergic Agents↗

The effect of fluvoxamine and sertraline on the opioid withdrawal syndrome: a combined in vivo cerebral microdialysis and behavioural study.

A microdialysis study was undertaken to determine the effect of acute and sub-chronic administration of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, fluvoxamine, and the acute effect of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor sertraline, on the naloxone precipitated opioid withdrawal induced increase in hippocampal noradrenaline levels. This study also determined the effect of fluvoxamine and sertraline on opioid withdrawal-induced physical behaviours. Naloxone (1 mg kg(-1); i.p.) increased noradrenaline levels in the hippocampus of morphine dependent rats 20 min after administration, with peak levels of 267+/-13% of baseline, occurring 40 min after administration of naloxone. Opioid withdrawal-induced physical behaviours were evident in morphine dependent rats 5 min after a naloxone injection (1 mg kg(-1); i.p.). Acute fluvoxamine or sertraline (10 mg kg(-1); i.p.) given 40 min before naloxone (1 mg kg(-1); i.p.) did not modify the increased hippocampal noradrenaline levels (242+/-15 and 242+/-19%, respectively), observed in morphine dependent rats following an naloxone injection. Acute fluvoxamine and sertraline (10 mg kg(-1); i.p.) reduced the severity of the naloxone precipitated opioid withdrawal syndrome. Sub-chronic treatment with fluvoxamine (10 mg kg(-1); i.p.) prevented the naloxone precipitated increase in hippocampal noradrenaline levels in morphine dependent rats. Furthermore, sub-chronic fluvoxamine produced a significantly reduced baseline level of noradrenaline in these rats which was 52.5+/-8% of baseline 40 min after naloxone.

Analgesics, Opioid↗

Fluvoxamine CR in the long-term treatment of social anxiety disorder: the 12- to 24-week extension phase of a multicentre, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

Fluvoxamine CR has been reported effective in the short-term (12-wk) treatment of generalized social anxiety disorder (social phobia). Social anxiety disorder (SAD) is, however, a chronic disorder thought to require maintenance treatment. We report on data from the extension phase of a short-term study, in order to explore the efficacy and safety profile of fluvoxamine CR (100-300 mg/d) in the longer-term treatment of this disorder. Adult outpatients with generalized social anxiety disorder (GSAD) at 35 centres in Europe, South Africa, and USA were included in an acute phase study (12 wk). Subjects who demonstrated at least minimal improvement by endpoint (n=112), were offered participation in an extension phase, in which medication was continued for a further 12 wk under double-blind conditions. Efficacy was assessed using the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Disorder Scale (LSAS), the Clinical Global Impression Global Improvement score (CGI-I), the Clinical Global Impressions Severity of Illness score (CGI-S), and the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS). Safety and tolerability assessments were also performed at regular intervals. Subjects treated with fluvoxamine CR had a numerically greater decrease in LSAS total scores than subjects treated with placebo at endpoint. Analysis of data from baseline (day 1) to endpoint (last observation carried forward) demonstrated that this difference tended towards significance, while severity of illness on the CGI-S and disability on the SDS were significantly lower in the fluvoxamine CR group than in the placebo group. The same trends were observed when only data from weeks 12-24 were included in the analysis; although the magnitude of changes was smaller in the extension phase than in the acute phase, fluvoxamine CR-treated subjects continued to show improvement compared to placebo-treated subjects. Most treatment-emergent signs and symptoms (TESS) were mild to moderate in severity. No unexpected abnormalities were reported on vital signs, electrocardiagrams, or laboratory investigations. These data support the long-term efficacy, safety, and tolerability of fluvoxamine CR in the treatment of GSAD. Given the prevalence, persistence, and disability associated with GSAD, and the relative paucity of long-term treatment studies of SAD, the current dataset provides empirical support for the current clinical consensus that pharmacotherapy of this disorder should be continued beyond the acute phase.

Adult↗

Inhibition of diazepam metabolism by fluvoxamine: a pharmacokinetic study in normal volunteers.

The effect of fluvoxamine on the pharmacokinetics of diazepam and metabolically derived N-desmethyl-diazepam was investigated in eight healthy volunteers. Each subject received a single oral dose of diazepam (10 mg) in a control session and on the fourth day of a 16-day treatment with fluvoxamine maleate (100 to 150 mg daily). Compared with the control session, concurrent fluvoxamine intake was associated with increased mean peak plasma diazepam concentrations (from 108 to 143 ng/ml, geometric means, difference not significant), with a marked reduction in apparent oral diazepam clearance (from 0.40 to 0.14 ml/min/kg; p < 0.01) and with a prolongation in diazepam half-life (from 51 to 118 hours; p < 0.01). Although peak plasma N-desmethyldiazepam levels were similar in the two sessions, the time required for the metabolite to reach a peak was longer during fluvoxamine intake than in the control session (206 versus 62 hours; p < 0.01). N-Desmethyldiazepam area under the plasma concentration-time curve values were also significantly increased during fluvoxamine treatment. These data suggest that fluvoxamine inhibits the biotransformation of diazepam and its active N-demethylated metabolite. The magnitude of this interaction is likely to have considerable clinical significance.

Adult↗

Polymorphism within the promoter of the serotonin transporter gene and antidepressant efficacy of fluvoxamine.

Depression with psychotic features has been shown to respond to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). The serotonin transporter (5-HTT) is a prime target for SSRIs. A functional polymorphism within the promoter region of the 5-HTT gene, leading to different transcriptional efficiency, was recently reported. We tested the hypothesis that allelic variation of the 5-HTT promoter could be related to the antidepressant response to fluvoxamine and/or augmentation with pindolol (a serotonin autoreceptors antagonist) which has been suggested as an augmentation therapy for nonresponders. One hundred and two inpatients with major depression with psychotic features were randomly assigned to treatment with a fixed dose of fluvoxamine and either placebo or pindolol for 6 weeks. Depression severity was assessed once a week using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Allelic variation in each subject was determined using a PCR-based method. Data were analyzed with a three-way repeated measures analysis of variance. Both homozygotes for the long variant (l/l) of the 5-HTT promoter and heterozygotes (l/s) showed a better response to fluvoxamine than homozygotes for the short variant (s/s). In the group treated with fluvoxamine plus pindolol all the genotypes acted like l/l treated with fluvoxamine alone. Fluvoxamine efficacy in delusional depression seems to be related to allelic variation within the promoter of the 5-HTT gene. Even though other factors may be implicated, genotyping at 5-HTT promoter may represent a promising tool to individualize the pharmacological treatment of depression.

Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation↗

Preclinical evidence on the psychotropic profile of fluvoxamine.

Serotonin (5-HT) reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) such as fluvoxamine are interesting compounds. Initially launched as antidepressants, they have been found to be active in various psychiatric disorders besides depression, including obsessive-compulsive disorder, panic disorder, and eating disturbances. Preliminary data suggest their efficacy in alcohol and drug abuse, aggression, and posttraumatic stress disorder as well. Along with those clinical findings, new preclinical data have emerged. For example, fluvoxamine has demonstrated activity in various models of anxiety in rodents. Its anxiolytic activity can be clearly discriminated from that of the benzodiazepines. In the DRL 72-sec paradigm, fluvoxamine exhibits a good antidepressant profile, similar to those of imipramine and flesinoxan. Studies have shown that fluvoxamine does not down-regulate beta-adrenoceptors; apparently, that property is not a conditio sine qua non for antidepressant activity. Results of studies of the mechanism of action of fluvoxamine in which drug discrimination tests were performed with rats and pigeons suggest that the fluvoxamine stimulus is not (or is only to a very limited degree) dependent on activation of 5-HT1A receptors or 5-HT1B/1D receptors, or both. Experimentation is ongoing in those animal models.

Animals↗

Fluvoxamine inhibits the CYP2C9 catalyzed biotransformation of tolbutamide.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to examine the interaction between fluvoxamine and tolbutamide to confirm that fluvoxamine inhibits CYP2C9. METHODS: The study was carried out as an open, randomized, crossover design with 14 healthy participants. In period A, all volunteers took 500 mg of tolbutamide orally. In period B, the volunteers were randomly assigned to one of two groups. Each group took either 150 mg or 75 mg of fluvoxamine a day for 5 days (day -3 to day 2). The groups then took 500 mg of tolbutamide as a single dose (day 0). In both periods, blood and urine were sampled at regular intervals. Plasma was analyzed for tolbutamide, and urine was analyzed for tolbutamide and its two metabolites, 4-hydroxytolbutamide and carboxytolbutamide by means of HPLC. RESULTS: During treatment with fluvoxamine, there was a statistically significant decrease in the median of the total clearance of tolbutamide, from 845 mL/h to 688 mL/h, among the volunteers who received 75 mg/d. There was a reduction that reached borderline statistical significance in the group that received 150 mg/d of tolbutamide. The clearance by means of 4-hydroxytolbutamide and carboxytolbutamide was significantly reduced in both groups (ie, from 901 mL/h to 318 mL/h in the group that received 150 mg of tolbutamide per day and from 723 mL/h to 457 mL/h in the group that received 75 mg of tolbutamide per day). Thus there was a tendency toward a more pronounced inhibition of the 4-hydroxylation during treatment with 150 mg/d of fluvoxamine compared with 75 mg/d, but the difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Fluvoxamine is a moderate inhibitor of CYP2C9 in vivo.

Adult↗

Effect of fluvoxamine on the pharmacokinetics of mexiletine in healthy Japanese men.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Fluvoxamine, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, is known to inhibit several hepatic cytochrome P450 (CYP) isozymes, in particular CYP1A2. Mexiletine is mainly catalyzed by CYP2D6 and partially catalyzed by CYP1A2. Our objective was to study the potential pharmacokinetic interaction between fluvoxamine and mexiletine. METHODS: A randomized crossover design with two phases was used. A 7-day washout period separated the two treatment conditions. In the one phase, 6 healthy Japanese men received an oral dose of 200 mg of mexiletine alone (study 1); in the other phase, the men received fluvoxamine (50 mg twice a day) for 7 days, and on the eighth day they received oral mexiletine (200 mg) and fluvoxamine concomitantly (study 2). The concentrations of mexiletine were measured with HPLC. RESULTS: The area under the concentration-time curve and serum peak concentration of mexiletine in study 2 were significantly increased compared with those in study 1 (10.4 +/- 4.85 versus 6.70 +/- 3.21 microg x h/mL, P =.006 and 0.623 +/- 0.133 versus 0.536 +/- 0.164 microg/mL, P =.008, respectively). CONCLUSION: The effect of fluvoxamine on the mexiletine disposition is comparatively large, and when mexiletine and fluvoxamine are coadministered careful monitoring of mexiletine is needed.

Administration, Oral↗

Effects of fluconazole and fluvoxamine on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of glimepiride.

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to study the effects of fluconazole and fluvoxamine on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of glimepiride, a new sulfonylurea antidiabetic drug. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, three-phase crossover study, 12 healthy volunteers took 200 mg of fluconazole once daily (400 mg on day 1), 100 mg of fluvoxamine once daily, or placebo once daily for 4 days. On day 4, a single oral dose of 0.5 mg of glimepiride was administered. Plasma glimepiride and blood glucose concentrations were measured up to 12 hours. RESULTS: In the fluconazole phase, the mean total area under the plasma concentration-time curve of glimepiride was 238% (P <.0001) and the peak plasma concentration was 151% (P <.0001) of the respective control value. The mean elimination half-life of glimepiride was prolonged from 2.0 to 3.3 hours (P <.0001) by fluconazole. In the fluvoxamine phase, the mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve of glimepiride was not significantly different from that in the placebo phase. However, the mean peak plasma concentration of glimepiride was 143% (P <.05) of the control and the elimination half-life was prolonged from 2.0 to 2.3 hours (P <.01) by fluvoxamine. Fluconazole and fluvoxamine did not cause statistically significant changes in the effects of glimepiride on blood glucose concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: Fluconazole considerably increased the area under the plasma concentration-time curve of glimepiride and prolonged its elimination half-life. This was probably caused by inhibition of the cytochrome P-450 2C9-mediated biotransformation of glimepiride by fluconazole. Concomitant use of fluconazole with glimepiride may increase the risk of hypoglycemia as much as would a 2- to 3-fold increase in the dose of glimepiride. Fluvoxamine moderately increased the plasma concentrations and slightly prolonged the elimination half-life of glimepiride.

Adult↗

Fluvoxamine versus clomipramine for obsessive-compulsive disorder: a double-blind comparison.

The efficacy and tolerability of fluvoxamine (100-300 mg/day) and clomipramine (100-250 mg/day) were compared in a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study of 79 patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) without coexisting major depression. After a 2-week placebo lead-in period, patients were randomized to fluvoxamine (37 patients) or clomipramine (42 patients) for 10 weeks. Efficacy was evaluated with the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS), the National Institute of Mental Health Obsessive-Compulsive scale, and Patient and Clinical Global Improvement scales. Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression scores and somatic symptoms were also assessed. Seventy-eight percent of fluvoxamine patients and 64% of clomipramine patients completed the study. At the end of treatment, 56% of fluvoxamine patients were classified as responders (> or = 25% decrease in Y-BOCS score), compared with 54% of clomipramine patients. Both groups showed steady improvement throughout the study; no statistically significant differences were observed between the groups for any efficacy variable at any time. A similar percentage of patients in both groups withdrew because of adverse events. No serious adverse events related to drug occurred with either drug. Insomnia, nervousness, and dyspepsia were more statistically frequent with fluvoxamine; dry mouth and postural hypotension were more frequent with clomipramine. In this study, fluvoxamine and clomipramine were equally effective in reducing OCD symptoms over a 10-week treatment period but displayed different side effect profiles.

Adolescent↗

Effect of SSRI antidepressants on ejaculation: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study with fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, paroxetine, and sertraline.

Depression is a common cause of sexual dysfunction, but also antidepressant medication is often associated with sexual side effects. This article includes two related studies. The first double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted in men with lifelong rapid ejaculation and aimed to assess putative differences between the major selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) (fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, paroxetine, and sertraline) with regard to their ejaculation-delaying effect. Sixty men with an intravaginal ejaculation latency time (IELT) of 1 minute or less were randomly assigned to receive fluoxetine 20 mg/day, fluvoxamine 100 mg/day, paroxetine 20 mg/day, sertraline 50 mg/day, or placebo for 6 weeks. During the 1-month baseline and 6-week treatment periods, the men measured their IELT at home using a stopwatch. The trial was completed by 51 men. During the 6-week treatment period, the geometric mean IELT in the placebo group was constant at approximately 20 seconds. Analysis of variance revealed a between-groups difference in the evolution of IELT delay (p = 0.0004); in the paroxetine, fluoxetine, and sertraline groups there was a gradual increase to about 110 seconds, whereas in the fluvoxamine group, IELT was increased to only approximately 40 seconds. The paroxetine, fluoxetine, and sertraline groups differed significantly (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p = 0.017, respectively) from placebo but the fluvoxamine group did not (p = 0.38). Compared with baseline, paroxetine exerted the strongest delay in ejaculation, followed by fluoxetine and sertraline. There was no clinically relevant delay in ejaculation with fluvoxamine. In men with lifelong rapid ejaculation, paroxetine delayed ejaculation most strongly, whereas fluvoxamine delayed ejaculation the least. The second double-blind, placebo-controlled study was carried out in men with lifelong rapid ejaculation (IELT < or = 1 minute) and in men with lifelong less-rapid ejaculation (IELT > 1 minute) to investigate whether data about SSRI-induced delayed ejaculation in men with rapid ejaculation may be extrapolated to men with less-rapid ejaculation. After measurement of IELT at home (using a stopwatch) during a 1-month baseline assessment, 32 men with an IELT of 1 minute or less (group 1) or more than 1 minute (group 2) were randomly assigned to receive paroxetine 20 mg/day or placebo for 6 weeks in a double-blind manner. Patients continued to measure their IELTs at home during the 6 weeks of the study. At baseline, 24 patients consistently had IELTs of one minute or less (group 1), and eight patients had IELTs of more than 1 minute (group 2). The geometric mean IELT was 14 seconds in group 1 and 83 seconds in group 2. Twelve patients in group 1 and five in group 2 were randomized to the paroxetine 20 mg/day. The percentage increase in the geometric mean IELT compared with baseline in patients treated with paroxetine was 420% (95% confidence interval [CI], 216-758%) in group 1 and 480% (95% CI, 177-1,118%) in group 2 (p = 0.81). After 6 weeks of treatment with paroxetine, the geometric mean IELT was 92 seconds in group 1 and 602 seconds in group 2 (p < 0.001). Therefore, the paroxetine-induced percentage increase in IELT seems to be independent of the baseline IELT. This suggests that ejaculation-delaying side effects of some SSRIs investigated in men with lifelong rapid ejaculation may be generalized to men with less-rapid ejaculation.

Adolescent↗

CYP2D6 status of extensive metabolizers after multiple-dose fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, paroxetine, or sertraline.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the CYP2D6 inhibitory effects of four selective rerotonin re-uptake inhibitors (SSRIs). Thirty-one healthy subjects were phenotyped as extensive metabolizers using the dextromethorphan/dextrorphan (DM/DX) urinary ratio as a marker for CYP2D6 activity before and after 8 days of administration of fluoxetine 60 mg (loading dose strategy), fluvoxamine 100 mg, paroxetine 20 mg, or sertraline 100 mg in a parallel-group design. Statistical analysis was performed on log-transformed DM/DX ratios because of variability within and between treatment groups. DM/DX ratios before (DM/DX(BL)) and after (DM/DX(SSRI)) were compared within and between the four SSRI groups. DM/DX(BL) ratios were not significantly different between the four SSRI treatment groups. Comparing within groups, significant differences between DM/DX(BL) and DM/DX(SSRI) were found for the fluoxetine (p < 0.001; ratio values, 0.020 vs. 0.364) and paroxetine (p = 0.0005, ratio values 0.029 vs. 1.085) but not for the fluvoxamine or sertraline groups. Comparing between groups, significant differences in DM/DX(SSRI) ratios were found for fluoxetine versus sertraline (p = 0.0019, DM/DX = 0.364 vs. 0.057), fluoxetine versus fluvoxamine (p < 0.0001, DM/DX = 0.364 vs. 0.019), paroxetine versus sertraline (p = 0.0026, DM/DX = 1.085 vs. 0.057), and paroxetine versus fluvoxamine (p < 0.0001, DM/DX = 1.085 vs. 0.019). No significant differences were noted between the two potent CYP2D6 inhibitors, fluoxetine and paroxetine, or the two weakest inhibitors, fluvoxamine and sertraline. Five subjects in the fluoxetine and four subjects in the paroxetine groups changed to poor metabolizer phenotype (DM/DX > or = 0.3) after treatment. Although CYP2D6 inhibitory effects of fluvoxamine and sertraline did not yield significant differences from baseline, some subjects exhibited DM/DX ratio increases of 150 to 200%. One paroxetine-treated subject did not exhibit any CYP2D6 inhibition. SSRI dose and plasma concentration may be correlated with the extent of CYP2D6 inhibition and should be further investigated.

Adult↗

Pharmacokinetic interaction of fluvoxamine and thioridazine in schizophrenic patients.

This study investigated to what extent fluvoxamine affects the pharmacokinetics of thioridazine (THD) in schizophrenic patients under steady-state conditions. Concentrations of THD, mesoridazine, and sulforidazine were measured in plasma samples obtained from 10 male inpatients, aged 36 to 78 years, at three different time points: A, during habitual monotherapy with THD at 88 +/-54 mg/day; B, after addition of a low dosage of fluvoxamine (25 mg twice a day) for 1 week; and C, 2 weeks after fluvoxamine discontinuation. After the addition of fluvoxamine, THD concentrations relative to time point A significantly increased approximately threefold from 0.40 to 1.21 micromol/L (225%) (p < 0.002), mesoridazine concentrations increased from 0.65 to 2.0 micromol/L (219%) (p < 0.004), and sulforidazine levels increased from 0.21 to 0.56 micromol/L (258%) (p < 0.004). The THD-mesoridazine and THD-sulforidazine ratios remained unchanged during the study. Mean plasma THD, mesoridazine, and sulforidazine levels decreased at time point C, but despite fluvoxamine discontinuation for 2 weeks, three patients continued to exhibit elevated concentrations of THD and its metabolites. In conclusion, fluvoxamine markedly interferes with the metabolism of THD, probably at the CYP2C19 and/or CYP1A2 enzyme level. Therefore, clinicians should be aware of the potential for a clinical drug interaction between both compounds, and careful monitoring of THD levels is valuable to prevent the accumulation of the drug and resulting toxicity.

Adult↗