Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Filgrastim”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 145 records · Page 8Linked to original sources
PubMed1999

A new form of Filgrastim with sustained duration in vivo and enhanced ability to mobilize PBPC in both mice and humans.

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) has proven effective in the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia and as a mobilizer of peripheral blood progenitor cells. The longevity of G-CSF action is limited by its removal from the body by two mechanisms. The first is thought to be mediated via receptors (receptor mediated clearance [RMC]) predominantly on neutrophils, the second process is likely the result of renal clearance. With the intention of developing a novel form of Filgrastim (r-met HuG-CSF) with a sustained duration of action in vivo, a new derivative named SD/01 has been made by association of Filgrastim with poly(ethylene glycol). The desired properties of this new agent would include a prolonged duration of action sufficient to cover a complete single course of chemotherapy. SD/01 is shown here to sustain significantly elevated neutrophil counts in hematopoietically normal mice for 5 days. In neutropenic mice effects were noted for at least 9 days, accompanying a significant reduction in the duration of chemotherapy induced neutropenia. Normal human volunteers showed higher than baseline ANC for around 9 to 10 days after a single injection of SD/01. Data from these normal volunteers also indicate that mobilization of CD34+ cells and progenitors may occur in a more timely manner and to around the same absolute numbers as with repeated daily injections of unmodified Filgrastim. These data indicate that SD/01 represents an efficacious novel form of Filgrastim with actions sustained for between one and two weeks from a single injection.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Ancestim (recombinant human stem cell factor, SCF) in association with filgrastim does not enhance chemotherapy and/or growth factor-induced peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) mobilization in patients with a prior insufficient PBPC collection.

Up to a third of autologous transplantation candidates fail to mobilize hematopoietic progenitors into the peripheral blood with chemotherapy and/or growth factor treatment, thus requiring innovative mobilization strategies. In total, 20 cancer patients unable to provide adequate PBPC products after a previous mobilization attempt were treated with ancestim (20 microg/kg/day s.c.) and filgrastim (10 microg/kg/day s.c.). In 16 patients, the pre-study mobilization was with filgrastim alone. Eight patients underwent single large volume leukapheresis (LVL) and 12 multiple standard volume leukaphereses (SVL) in both mobilizations. Pairwise comparison of peripheral blood CD34(+) cell concentrations on the day of first leukapheresis failed to document synergism - median CD34(+)/microl of 3.2 (<0.1 to 15.4) and 4.5 (1-28.56) for the pre-study and on-study mobilizations (P = 0.79, sign test), and 4.2 (<0.1-15.4) and 5 (1-28.56), respectively, for the 16 patients previously mobilized with filgrastim alone (P = 1, sign test). The number of CD34(+) cells/kg collected per unit of blood volume (BV) processed was similar in both mobilizations - median 0.1 x 10(6)/kg/BV and 0.09 x 10(6)/kg/BV, respectively (P = 1, sign test). In this phase II study, the combination of ancestim and filgrastim did not allow adequate PBPC mobilization and collection in patients with a previous suboptimal PBPC collection.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

A randomized study comparing filgrastim versus lenograstim versus molgramostim plus chemotherapy for peripheral blood progenitor cell mobilization.

We conducted a prospective randomized clinical trial to assess the mobilizing efficacy of filgrastim, lenograstim and molgramostim following a disease-specific chemotherapy regimen. Mobilization consisted of high-dose cyclophosphamide in 45 cases (44%), and cisplatin/ifosfamide/etoposide or vinblastine in 22 (21%), followed by randomization to either filgrastim or lenograstim or molgramostim at 5 microg/kg/day. One hundred and three patients were randomized, and 82 (79%) performed apheresis. Forty-four (43%) patients were chemonaive, whereas 59 (57%) were pretreated. A median number of one apheresis per patient (range, 1-3) was performed. The median number of CD34+ cells obtained after mobilization was 8.4 x 10(6)/kg in the filgrastim arm versus 5.8 x 10(6)/kg in the lenograstim arm versus 4.0 x 10(6)/kg in the molgramostim arm (P=0.1). A statistically significant difference was observed for the median number of days of growth factor administration in favor of lenograstim (12 days) versus filgrastim (13 days) and molgramostim (14 days) (P<0.0001) and for the subgroup of chemonaive patients (12 days) versus pretreated patients (14 days) (P<0.001). In conclusion, all three growth factors were efficacious in mobilizing peripheral blood progenitor cells with no statistically significant difference between CD34+ cell yield and the different regimens, and the time to apheresis is likely confounded by the different mobilization regimens.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗
PubMed1999

Allogeneic blood progenitor cell collection in normal donors after mobilization with filgrastim: the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center experience.

BACKGROUND: Information on the safety and efficacy of allogeneic peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) collection in filgrastim-mobilized normal donors is still limited. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The PBPC donor database from a 42-month period (12/94-5/98) was reviewed for apheresis and clinical data related to PBPC donation. Normal PBPC donors received filgrastim (6 microg/kg subcutaneously every 12 hours) for 3 to 4 days and subsequently underwent daily leukapheresis. The target collection was > or =4 x 10(6)CD34+ cells per kg of recipient's body weight. RESULTS: A total of 350 donors were found to be evaluable. Their median age was 41 years (range, 4-79). Their median preapheresis white cell count was 42.8 x 10(9) per L (range, 18.3-91.6). Of these donors, 17 (5%) had inadequate peripheral venous access. Leukapheresis could not be completed because of apheresis-related adverse events in 2 donors (0.5%). Of the 324 donors evaluable for apheresis yield data, 221 (68%) reached the collection target with one leukapheresis. The median CD34+ cell dose collected (first leukapheresis) was 462 x 10(6) (range, 29-1463). The main adverse events related to filgrastim administration in donors evaluable for toxicity (n = 341) were bone pain (84%), headache (54%), fatigue (31%), and nausea (13%). These events were rated as moderate to severe (grade 2-3) by 171 (50%) of the donors. In 2 donors (0.5%), they prompted the discontinuation of filgrastim administration. CONCLUSION: PBPC apheresis for allogeneic transplantation is safe and well tolerated. It allows the collection of an "acceptable" PBPC dose in most normal donors with one leukapheresis, with minimal need for invasive procedures.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Neutrophil adhesion molecules in colorectal surgery: effect of filgrastim given perioperatively.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether the postoperative expression of neutrophil adhesion molecules CD11b/CD18 (Mac-1) and CD62L (L-selectin) would differ in peripheral blood, peritoneal fluid and wound fluid in patients operated on for colorectal conditions, and to analyse the effect of perioperative filgrastim on their expression. DESIGN: Prospective randomised double-blind placebo-controlled clinical study. SETTING: University hospital, Finland. SUBJECTS: Thirty consecutive patients undergoing elective colorectal operations (15 in each group). INTERVENTIONS: The patients were prospectively randomised to receive either filgrastim or placebo. Expression of neutrophil adhesion molecules was measured 48 hours postoperatively in peripheral blood, peritoneal fluid, and wound fluid by flow cytometry. RESULTS: Postoperative neutrophil CD11b/CD18 expression was higher in both wound fluid and peritoneal fluid than in peripheral blood in the placebo group. Simultaneously, the expression of neutrophil CD62L was higher in peripheral blood than in peritoneal fluid or wound fluid in both groups. Filgrastim caused increased postoperative expression of neutrophil CD11b/CD18 in peripheral blood but not in peritoneal fluid or wound fluid. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative expression of neutrophil adhesion molecules differs at the local operation site from that in peripheral blood. Filgrastim increases only blood neutrophil CD11b/CD18 expression.

Cell Adhesion Molecules↗
PubMed2004

Effect of filgrastim on serum lactate dehydrogenase and alkaline phosphatase values in early breast cancer patients.

To improve chemotherapy dose intensity and to optimize the use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor, 506 patients with early breast cancer were randomly assigned to high dose epirubicin and cyclophospamide (EC) with or without prophylactic subcutaneously filgrastim, according to 5 different schedules: 480 microg or 300 microg daily or every other day, on day 8 through day 14, and 300 microg daily on days 8 and 12 of each chemotherapy course, Serum levels of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and alkaline phosphatase (AP) were significantly higher in patients given EC plus filgrastim than EC alone (P = 0.0001), the rate of G1-3 toxicity being 33.4% and 13.1% vs. 1.6% and 1%, respectively. No clinical evidence of filgrastim-related hepatic damage or significant difference in transaminase and gamma-GT elevation was seen between the two groups. LDH and AP closely resembled peripheral blood leukocytes count and increased with increasing leucocytosis, throughout the 5 schedules. Although no patient continued treatment for filgrastim-related side effects, and LDH and AP rises resolved spontaneously within 3 weeks following the chemotherapy course, physicians should be aware of the transient and innocuous change in serum chemistry associated to leucocytosis, since it could be misinterpreted as expression of disease activity.

Alkaline Phosphatase↗
PubMed2000

A randomized controlled trial of filgrastim for the treatment of hospitalized patients with multilobar pneumonia.

This study assessed the safety and efficacy of filgrastim (r-metHuG-CSF [recombinant human methionine granulocyte colony-stimulating factor]), when combined with intravenous (IV) antibiotics, in the treatment of hospitalized adult patients with multilobar community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Four hundred eighty patients were randomized to receive placebo (n=243) or filgrastim 300 microg/day (n=237), in addition to standard therapy. Treatment with study drug was continued for 10 days, until the peak white blood cell (WBC) count reached 75x109/L, until discharge from the hospital, until death, or until IV antibiotics were discontinued. Study-related observations continued through day 29. Filgrastim increased WBC counts (baseline median, 13.3x109/L; median peak, 43. 8x109/L). The 2 treatment groups were not statistically different with respect to the study end points; however, there was a trend toward reduction of mortality in patients with pneumococcal bacteremia. Although further studies will be required to validate this observation, filgrastim was safe and well tolerated when administered to patients with multilobar CAP.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

A randomized controlled trial of filgrastim as an adjunct to antibiotics for treatment of hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia. CAP Study Group.

Because of the critical role of neutrophils in host defenses, it was hypothesized that stimulation of neutrophil production and function with Filgrastim would improve the outcome of hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia. To test this hypothesis, a randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial of Filgrastim (300 micrograms/day up to 10 days) as an adjunct to antibiotics was conducted for these patients. Outcome measures included time to resolution of morbidity (TRM, a composite measure of temperature, respiratory rate, blood oxygenation, and chest radiograph), 28-day mortality, length of stay, and adverse events. Filgrastim increased blood neutrophils 3-fold, but TRM, mortality, and length of hospitalization were not affected. Treatment, however, accelerated radiologic improvement and appeared to reduce serious complications (e.g., empyema, adult respiratory distress syndrome, and disseminated intravascular coagulation). Filgrastim administration was safe and well tolerated in these patients. Additional trials are needed to establish the value of this approach to treatment of infectious diseases.

APACHE↗
PubMed1999

Anti-inflammatory aspects of Filgrastim and impact on IL-2 release.

G-CSF has immunomodulatory effects of neutrophilic granulocytes and monocytes/macrophages. Two studies were done: one in normal volunteers and the other in HIV-infected patients plus their respective control donors to evaluate the effect of Filgrastim on cytokine responses. Filgrastim treatment of volunteers resulted in an anti-inflammatory cytokine response, when blood was stimulated ex vivo with the endotoxin lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Similarly, in the presence of Filgrastim in vitro, the LPS-inducible release of proinflammatory cytokines was attenuated. Blood from HIV-infected patients at advanced stages of disease showed reduced interleukin (IL)-2 formation in response to staphylococcal exotoxin B (SEB), which was restored in the presence of Filgrastim.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Phase I/II trial of filgrastim (r-metHuG-CSF), CEOP chemotherapy and antiretroviral therapy in HIV-related non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: A phase I/II trial determined the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of CEOP for AIDS-related non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) with concurrent filgrastim and antiretroviral therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fourteen AIDS-NHL patients, chemotherapy naïve and ECOG performance status < 2 received filgrastim 1.0 microgram/kg s.c. daily for 3-7 days to assess neutrophil response, followed by CEOP with filgrastim support 10 micrograms/kg s.c. daily, day 2-14, continued if the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) < 1.2 x 10(9)/l. Two CEOP dose cohorts were used: cohort 1 (5 patients) - cyclophosphamide (C) 500 mg/m2, epirubicin (E) 37.5 mg/m2, vincristine (O) 2 mg and prednisolone (P) 75 mg/m2 daily on days 1-5; cohort 2 (9 patients) - C 750 mg/m2, E 50 mg/m2, same doses of O and P. Antiretroviral therapy was maintained (zidovudine-10, ddI-3, both-1). RESULTS: In cohort 1, 4/5 patients received at least 3 courses of CEOP with one complete response after five cycles and four progressions. Four have died (3-21 months after entry) with 1 alive at 40 months. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT - grade IV febrile neutropenia in cycle 1) occurred in 1 patient. In cohort 2, 5/9 completed > or = 5 cycles with 6 complete responses, 1 partial response and 2 progressions, 6 deaths and 3 alive at > 33 months. DLT (evaluable in 8 patients) occurred in two patients. Median survival for both cohorts was 17 months. Mean relative dose intensity was > 85%. CONCLUSIONS: The dosages of CEOP in cohort 1 defined the MTD however, the cohort 2 doses with filgrastim and antiretroviral therapy gave an encouraging response, acceptable toxicities and merit further study.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Filgrastim and lack of support of intensive adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk breast cancer patients.

The capacity of filgrastim to reduce the myelotoxicity of a 16-week intensive chemotherapy regimen has been investigated in 24 operable breast cancer patients with > or = 10 metastatic axillary nodes. Five patients were treated with chemotherapy alone (control group); 19 patients were treated with chemotherapy and filgrastim, 5 microg/kg/day s.c. Six patients in the latter group were treated from day 4 to day 7 (level 1), seven from day 10 to day 13 (level 2), and six from day 4 to day 7 and day 10 to day 13 (level 3). A total of 135 courses were administered: neutropenia was the most severe toxicity, and the prophylactic use of filgrastim does not reduce its severity. Moreover, the dose intensities of antiblastic drugs actually received by the patients were not significantly different in the four study groups. Among the patients treated at level 3, there were three toxic deaths: one patient died because of febrile neutropenia and sepsis, two patients because of ischemic colitis. At a median follow-up of 15 months, 17 patients were alive, and 15 patients were disease free. The use of filgrastim does not ameliorate myelotoxicity and does not allow the administration of the planned doses of antiblastic drugs of a 16-week intensive chemotherapy regimen.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Phase I trial of a 96 h paclitaxel infusion with filgrastim support in refractory solid tumor patients.

A phase I study of a 96 h paclitaxel infusion with filgrastim support was performed to determine the toxicity, maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and pharmacokinetics in patients with refractory solid tumors. In this phase I trial, the initial paclitaxel dose was 140 mg/m2/96 h followed by filgrastim (5 microg/kg/day s.c.) beginning 24 h after the paclitaxel and continued until granulocyte recovery. Cycles were repeated every 21 days. Patients with refractory solid tumors were eligible; however, only one previous chemotherapy regimen was allowed. The dose of paclitaxel was escalated by 20 mg/m2/96 h in subsequent cohorts until dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) occurred. Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed by quantitating paclitaxel concentrations at baseline, 24, 48, 72 and 96 h after the start of the paclitaxel infusion. Twenty-one patients were entered into this trial of which 19 were evaluable. A total of 52 treatment cycles were administered. DLT was seen in two of four patients at 200 mg/m2/96 h, and consisted of diarrhea, mucositis and granulocytopenic infection. The MTD of the 96 h paclitaxel infusion was 180 mg/m2 with filgrastim support. Mucosal and granulocyte toxicity were correlated with steady-state paclitaxel concentrations (Css) greater than 0.100 micromol/l. In the presence of liver function test 1.5 times or lower than normal, metastatic liver disease did not alter paclitaxel Css. Objective responses were observed in non-small cell lung cancer, small cell lung cancer and melanoma. The recommended phase II dose of paclitaxel infused over 96 h with filgrastim support is 180 mg/m2. Paclitaxel Css correlate with mucosal and granulocyte toxicity. In the presence of normal enzymatic function, metastatic liver disease does not affect paclitaxel clearance.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the use of filgrastim in patients hospitalized with pneumonia and severe sepsis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety and efficacy of filgrastim (r-metHuG-CSF) in combination with intravenous antibiotics to reduce the rate of mortality in patients with pneumonia and sepsis. DESIGN: This study was multicenter, double-blind, and randomized. SETTING: Intensive care units PATIENTS Adult patients with bacterial pneumonia, either acquired or nosocomial, as confirmed by chest radiograph and positive culture or Gram-negative stain, and severe sepsis, defined as sepsis-induced hypotension or organ dysfunction. INTERVENTIONS: Standard antibiotic therapy with or without filgrastim (300 microg/day) or placebo administered as a 30-min intravenous infusion. The study drug was started within 24 hrs of enrollment and was continued for 5 days or until the white blood cell count reached >75.0 x 10(9) cells/L. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary end point was the occurrence of mortality through day 29; secondary end points included occurrence of subsequent organ dysfunction, time to discharge from intensive care unit, number of days on mechanical ventilatory support, and time to death. Study-related observations were recorded through day 10 and included vital signs, onset of organ dysfunction, clinical laboratory variables, and adverse events. Filgrastim increased the white blood cell count to a median peak of 31.7 x 10(9) cells/L from a baseline of 12.3 x 10(9) cells/L. The two groups were well matched and did not differ significantly with regard to severe adverse events, time to death, occurrence of end-organ dysfunction, days of intensive care unit hospitalization, or days on mechanical ventilatory support. Mortality was low in both treatment groups; the mortality rate in patients with adult respiratory distress syndrome was similar between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of filgrastim to the antibiotic and supportive care treatment of patients with pneumonia complicated by severe sepsis appeared to be safe, but not efficacious in reducing mortality rates or complications from this infection.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Randomized, dose-escalation study of SD/01 compared with daily filgrastim in patients receiving chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: To explore the use of SD/01 (a polyethylene glycol-conjugated filgrastim shown in preclinical studies to have a prolonged half-life) in patients with chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirteen patients with non-small-cell lung cancer were randomized to receive daily filgrastim (5 microg/kg/d) or a single injection of SD/01 (30, 100, or 300 microg/kg) 2 weeks before chemotherapy and again 24 hours after administration of carboplatin and paclitaxel. Pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic, and safety analyses were performed. RESULTS: Peak serum concentrations of SD/01 and the duration of increased serum concentrations were dependent on the SD/01 dose. SD/01 concentrations remained increased longer in patients with chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. Prechemotherapy median absolute neutrophil counts (ANCs) in patients receiving SD/01 were increased in a dose-dependent fashion, with the duration of this effect also being dose dependent. After chemotherapy, median ANC nadirs were similar in the filgrastim cohort and the cohort receiving SD/01 30 microg/kg, with higher nadirs seen in the cohorts receiving SD/01 100 or 300 microg/kg. Dose-limiting toxicities were not noted. CD34(+) cells were mobilized in all cohorts. CONCLUSION: A single dose of SD/01 increases the serum concentration of SD/01 for several days in a dose-dependent fashion and is not associated with significant toxicity. The effects of SD/01 on ANC and CD34(+) cell mobilization are comparable or greater than those achieved with daily filgrastim. The self-regulation of this molecule provides a potential therapeutic advantage in a variety of clinical settings associated with neutropenia.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

Comparative safety of filgrastim versus sargramostim in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare rates of adverse events with filgrastim versus sargramostim when given prophylactically to patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy. DESIGN: Retrospective review with center crossover. SETTING: Ten United States outpatient chemotherapy centers. PATIENTS: Four hundred ninety patients treated for lung, breast, lymphatic system, or ovarian tumors. INTERVENTION: Prophylactic use of filgrastim or sargramostim, with dosages at investigator discretion. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The frequency and severity of adverse events and the frequency of switching to the alternative CSF were assessed. There was no difference in infectious fever. Fever unexplained by infection was more common with sargramostim (7% vs 1%, p<0.001), as were fatigue, diarrhea, injection site reactions, other dermatologic disorders, and edema (all p<0.05). Skeletal pain was more frequent with filgrastim (p=0.06). Patients treated with sargramostim switched to the alternative agent more often (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Adverse events were less frequent with filgrastim than with sargramostim, suggesting that quality of life and treatment costs also may differ.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed2002

Use of filgrastim for stem cell mobilisation and transplantation in high-dose cancer chemotherapy.

Myeloablative or high-dose chemotherapy regimens utilise doses that are significantly greater than those used in standard treatments. The neutropenia caused by these high-dose therapies can be associated with an increased incidence of bacterial and fungal infections and remains an important clinical issue among patients with advanced-stage cancers. Filgrastim is approved for stem cell mobilisation in both chemotherapy-treated patients and normal donors. Harvested peripheral blood progenitor cells have been used effectively in allogeneic and autologous transplantation, increasing the speed and extent of neutrophil and platelet recovery. Accelerated haematopoietic recovery is associated with a significantly shorter hospital stay and, therefore, leads to a reduction in treatment costs. The contribution of filgrastim to the acceleration of haematopoietic recovery after peripheral blood progenitor cell transplant has been assessed in a number of prospective clinical trials after high-dose chemotherapy. Controversy remains over whether growth factors should be administered shortly after stem cell infusion or after several days. The recently approved, once-weekly form of filgrastim, pegfilgrastim, has been shown to have efficacy comparable to that of the native molecule and can be expected to enhance patient quality of life through the need for fewer injections. This article will review the role of filgrastim for stem cell mobilisation and transplantation in patients receiving high-dose chemotherapy.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed1997

G-CSF (filgrastim) as an adjunct to MOPP/ABVD therapy in Hodgkin's disease.

The main objective of this study was to assess to what extent filgrastim (G-CSF, Amgen-Roche) can facilitate administration of the full dose intensity of MOPP/ABVD chemotherapy to patients with Hodgkin's disease. Sixteen patients with Hodgkin's disease were treated with MOPP/ABVD and filgrastim support between January 1992 and March 1994. Twenty-five patients treated with MOPP/ABVD 1987-1991 served as historical controls. The two groups were well matched for age, gender, stage, performance status and histological subgroups, but in the study group more patients had B-symptoms (p < 0.05). Dose intensity (DI) was calculated in mg/m2/week and the intended average dose was designated as 1. The planned average DI was reached by 8/16 patients in the study group but by only 1/25 in the control group (p < 0.001). The reasons for decreased DI in the study group were neutropenia (n = 5), thrombocytopenia (2 pts) and neurotoxicity (n = 1). In the control group the reason for decreased DI was neutropenia (n = 24). In the study group 15/16 patients achieved Complete Response (CR), 2/15 relapsed and 15/16 were surviving after a median follow-up 31 (6-48) months. In the control group 25/25 patients attained CR, 5/25 relapsed and 20/25 were surviving after a median follow up 67 (12-100) months. No severe toxicity was observed during filgrastim therapy. To conclude, the dose intensity during MOPP/ABVD therapy was significantly higher if filgrastim was administered, but the additional benefit that this confers remains to be determined. A large scale, retrospective analyses of treatment response and actual dose-intensity should help answer this question and give guidance as to if and when hematopoietic growth factors should be administered to patients with Hodgkin's disease.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

A comparison of efficacy of sargramostim (yeast-derived RhuGM-CSF) and filgrastim (bacteria-derived RhuG-CSF) in the therapeutic setting of chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression.

A randomized, double-blind, multicenter study in 181 afebrile cancer patients with ANC levels < 500/microL receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy was undertaken to compare sargramostim (yeast-derived recombinant human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, RhuGM-CSF) and filgrastim (bacteria-derived recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, RhuG-CSF) in the treatment of chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression. Patients received daily subcutaneous (SC) injections of either agent until ANC levels reached at least 1500/microL. There was no statistical difference between treatment groups in the mean number of days to reach an ANC of 500/microL, but the mean number of days to reach ANC levels of 1000/microL and 1500/microL was approximately one day less in patients receiving filgrastim. Fewer patients in the sargramostim arm were hospitalized, and they had a shorter mean length of hospitalization, mean duration of fever, and mean duration of i.v. antibiotic therapy compared with patients who received filgrastim. Both growth factors were well tolerated. No patient was readmitted to the hospital after growth factor was discontinued. Sargramostim and filgrastim have comparable efficacy and tolerability in the treatment of standard-dose chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression in community practice.

Adult↗