Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Fecal Incontinence”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 145 records · Page 8Linked to original sources
PubMed2004

The prevalence of fecal incontinence in community-dwelling adults: a systematic review of the literature.

PURPOSE: Reported prevalence estimates for fecal incontinence among community-dwelling adults vary widely. A systematic review was undertaken to investigate the studied prevalence of fecal incontinence in the community and explore the heterogeneity of study designs and sources of bias that may explain variability in estimates. METHODS: A predetermined search strategy was used to locate all studies published that reported the prevalence of fecal incontinence in a community-based sample of adults. Data were extracted onto a proforma for sampling frame and method, sample size, response rate, definition of fecal incontinence used, data-collection method, and prevalence rates. Included studies were critically appraised for possible sources of selection bias, information bias, and imprecision. RESULTS: A total of 16 studies met the inclusion criteria. These could be grouped into definitions of incontinence that included or excluded incontinence of flatus. The estimated prevalence of anal incontinence (including flatus incontinence) varied from 2 to 24 percent, and the estimated prevalence of fecal incontinence (excluding flatus incontinence) varied from 0.4 to 18 percent. Only three studies were found to have a study design that minimized significant sources of bias, and only one of these used a validated instrument for data collection. The prevalence estimate of fecal incontinence from these studies was 11 to 15 percent. No pooling of estimates was undertaken because there was wide variation in study design. CONCLUSIONS: A consensus definition of fecal incontinence is needed that accounts for alterations in quality of life. Further cross-sectional studies are required that minimize bias in their design and use validated self-administered questionnaires.

Bias↗
PubMed1995

Can manometric parameters predict response to biofeedback therapy in fecal incontinence?

PURPOSE: Biofeedback therapy may improve fecal control in up to 50 percent to 92 percent of patients with fecal incontinence. Identification of favorable manometric parameters before biofeedback therapy may help in selection of patients suitable for such therapy. METHODS: Twenty-eight patients with fecal incontinence (idiopathic, 11; iatrogenic trauma, 8; obstetric trauma, 9) who underwent biofeedback therapy were studied to determine whether manometric parameters could predict the result of therapy. Biofeedback was given using a computer software program designed to strengthen the external anal sphincter with auditory and visual feedback. RESULTS: Thirteen patients (46.4 percent) achieved excellent results; eight patients (28.6 percent) had good results, but seven patients (24.5 percent) failed to improve after biofeedback therapy. Resting or squeeze anal canal pressure, pressure volume, sphincter length, sphincter fatigue rate, and cross-sectional asymmetry of the entire sphincter before biofeedback failed to reveal any statistically significant differences between responders and nonresponders. However, the cross-sectional asymmetry of the high-pressure zone within the sphincter at rest was greater in nonresponders than in responders (not improved, 25.8 percent; good result, 20.2 percent; excellent result, 15.4 percent; P < 0.07). This difference was even greater on squeeze (not improved, 21 percent; good result, 17.6 percent; excellent result, 13.2 percent; P < 0.04). The number of biofeedback sessions, response on bearing down, and quality of rectoanal excitatory reflex were not reliable indicators of outcome. No statistical difference was found in mean resting and squeeze pressures after biofeedback between responders and non-responders. CONCLUSIONS: Except for increased cross-sectional asymmetry in the high-pressure zone, which may be a forerunner of adverse outcome, manometric parameters before biofeedback do not predict response to biofeedback therapy. Improvement in continence may be independent of resting and squeeze pressures achieved after biofeedback therapy.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Risk factors for fecal incontinence in a nursing home population.

Even though fecal incontinence is a leading cause of nursing home placement, risk factors contributing to its development have not been established. Identification of such factors may lead to prevention of incontinence and reduce the need for nursing home placement. A total of 388 residents of five nursing homes were included. Data regarding mental status, bowel habits, obstetrics history, and the presence, frequency, and severity of fecal incontinence were collected for each participant. Of the 388 nursing home residents, 46% were incontinent of feces. Incontinence was 1.5 times more common in males and in those younger than 65 years of age. In both univariate and multivariate analyses, diarrhea, dementia, restricted mobility, and male gender were independently associated with incontinence. In contrast to previous studies, constipation was not associated with fecal incontinence. If elimination of these risk factors leads to prevention of incontinence in even a few people, some elderly patients may not require institutionalization, which will result in improvement in their quality of life, not to mention a reduction in public health expenditures.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Fecal incontinence in Wisconsin nursing homes: prevalence and associations.

INTRODUCTION: This report determines the characteristics and health histories that are associated with fecal incontinence in a nursing home population. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey is reported comprised of data from the Health Care Finance Administration's Minimum Data Set submitted by Wisconsin skilled nursing facilities to the Wisconsin Center for Health Statistics' Annual Nursing Home Survey in 1992 and 1993. Demographic characteristics, functional status, and disease history were correlated with the dependent variable, fecal incontinence. RESULTS: In both 1992 and 1993, significant positive associations with fecal incontinence included the following, in order of adjusted odds ratios: urinary incontinence, tube feeding, any loss of activities of daily living, diarrhea, truncal restraints, pressure ulcers, dementia, impaired vision, fecal impaction, constipation, male gender, age, and increasing body mass index. Significant inverse associations were noted for heart disease and depression in one of the years and arthritis in both years. In both years, diabetes was not associated with fecal incontinence. CONCLUSION: Urinary incontinence frequently coexists with fecal incontinence. The treatment of fecal incontinence may depend more on awareness of these significant associations, such as tube feeding, impaction, diarrhea, and loss of activities of daily living, which might exacerbate fecal incontinence, than on the condition of the anal sphincter.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed1997

Development and evaluation of a protocol to manage fecal incontinence in the patient with cancer.

Fecal incontinence is an important yet often overlooked clinical problem in the care of patients with cancer. This paper presents a protocol for the assessment and management of this distressing symptom. The objective of the protocol is to regulate bowel motion, thereby minimizing fecal incontinence and improving patients' physical functioning, self-esteem, dignity, and quality of life. A comprehensive assessment addressing the patient's physical status, previous elimination routines, dietary habits, and medications provides the foundation for successful management. Components of the intervention include dietary modification, pharmacotherapy with laxatives and suppositories, and attention to routines that capitalize on the normal, involuntary gastrointestinal reflexes. Promotion of normal bowel elimination patterns, positioning, and comprehensive patient teaching and support are also critical components of the intervention. Our experience with this protocol and the outcomes achieved in a small series of patients are discussed.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Endoscopic pudendal canal decompression for the treatment of fecal incontinence due to pudendal canal syndrome.

Fecal incontinence resulting from pudendal canal syndrome has been treated by pudendal canal decompression (PCD) with satisfactory results. Considering the possible difficulty in exposing the pudendal canal and nerve by the open method, laparoscopic PCD was practiced in 9 women aged between 37 and 52 years. They were complaining of fecal incontinence; urinary stress incontinence was an additional complaint in 4/9 women. Neurologic, manometric, and EMG studies confirmed the diagnosis of pudendal canal syndrome. For laparoscopic PCD a 1-cm incision lateral to the anal orifice was performed. A balloon dilator was introduced in the ischiorectal fossa (IRF) to create a working space, and CO2 was insufflated. Under the guidance of a laparoscope, the IRF was entered and the inferior rectal nerve identified and followed to the pudendal canal. The latter was split open, releasing the pudendal nerve into the IRF. Fecal control was achieved in 7/9 patients and urinary control in 2/4. Fecal and urinary control were associated with improvement in perianal sensation, rectal neck pressure, EMG of external anal sphincter and levator ani muscle as well as in pudendal nerve terminal motor latency. Two women showed no improvement. Failure is suggested to be due to an advanced pudendal neuropathy. In conclusion, laparoscopic PCD is a simple, easy, and safe procedure. It allows for better exposure of the contents of the IRF than the open procedure, thus avoiding injury of the pudendal nerve and its branches during the performance of the PCD.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

[Fecal incontinence. Patient assessment and classical treatments].

Fecal incontinence is a very common disease but its exact prevalence is largely unknown. The condition gives rise to personal and social stigma with severe repercussions for the patient. It can be caused by a large number of physiopathologic disorders and consequently there is a wide variety of treatments. In this article we review the incidence and etiology of fecal incontinence, physical and instrumental examinations (with description of the components of the anorectal laboratory), traditional medical and surgical treatments and, lastly, the results of sphincteroplasties.

Digestive System Surgical Procedures↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Fecal incontinence: role of anal sphincter rehabilitation].

Fecal incontinence is a highly disabling symptom which causes the patient to gradually abandon all forms of social, family and working relationships. Rehabilitation was adopted initially in cases of surgical failure and considered as being only palliative. In our study we tested an original rehabilitation protocol for faecal incontinence which embraces 3 methods--physio-kinesitherapy, electrostimulation and biofeedback--in what we have called "anal sphincter functional rehabilitation". The study was conducted in 196 patients (61 M, 135 F) mean age 42.9 (range: 11-86), with faecal incontinence of varying aetiology. The 3 methods were carried out simultaneously in 3 one-hour sessions a week. The protocol envisaged 15 consecutive sessions at the end of which a first assessment was made of the results achieved. Therapeutic success was achieved in 93.4% of cases. The results obtained with our protocol do not differ from those reported by other Authors and we can therefore state that functional rehabilitation of the anal sphincter is to be viewed not merely as a valid alternative to surgery, but as the therapy of choice for fecal incontinence.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1993

Pudendal neuropathy and the importance of EMG evaluation of fecal incontinence.

A prospective study was undertaken to evaluate pudendal neuropathy in fecal incontinence. Fifty-two patients (38 women and 14 men) with fecal incontinence underwent manometric and electromyographic evaluation (measurement of pudendal nerve terminal motor latency [PNTML] and sphincter muscle mapping). The average age of all patients was 54 +/- 17 years. Fifty-two percent (27/52) were found to have a pudendal neuropathy (PNTML > 2.1 milliseconds). Seventeen of these 27 patients (63 percent) had a bilateral pudendal neuropathy. Patients with a pudendal neuropathy were older than those without a neuropathy (63.7 years vs. 51.9 years; P = 0.01). Women were significantly more likely than men to have a pudendal neuropathy (P = 0.03). Nine patients had an anatomic sphincter defect identified, and six of these (67 percent) had a neuropathy; 4/6 (67 percent) had a bilateral pudendal neuropathy. In the 43 patients who did not have an anatomic sphincter defect, there was no difference in resting pressure (69 mmHg vs. 60 mmHg; P = 0.4) or maximum voluntary contraction (95 mmHg vs. 86 mmHg; P = 0.5) when patients without a neuropathy were compared with those with a neuropathy. Patients with a pudendal neuropathy had a shorter sphincter length than those without a neuropathy (3.0 cm vs. 3.9 cm; P = 0.01). Bilateral pudendal neuropathy tended to occur more frequently in women (P = 0.08) and was not associated with poorer resting pressure, maximum voluntary contraction, or shorter sphincter length. We conclude that pudendal neuropathy is a common cause of fecal incontinence, particularly in older women, and frequently occurs in association with a sphincter defect. Manometric evaluation alone is not helpful in identifying the neuropathic patient. PNTMLs should be routinely measured in the evaluation of fecal incontinence.

Adult↗
PubMed2007

Sacral nerve stimulation in fecal incontinence: are there factors associated with success?

PURPOSE: Sacral nerve stimulation has been used successfully in treating fecal incontinence. This study was designed to evaluate the proportion of patients with unsuccessful implantation despite positive test stimulation and to examine and compare factors associated with the success of the transitory and permanent sacral nerve stimulation. METHODS: A total of 61 patients (55 females; median age, 56 (range, 33-77) years) with refractory fecal incontinence underwent temporary stimulation. A 50 percent or greater improvement in the number of episodes of fecal incontinence or urgency was required to proceed to permanent implantation and was the criteria of success of permanent sacral nerve stimulation at the last follow-up visit in implanted patients. The factors compared between the success and the failure groups during temporary and permanent stimulation were patients' age and gender, diagnosis and characteristics of fecal incontinence, previous surgery, quality of life scores, anorectal manometry, endoanal ultrasound, and electrophysiologic tests performed before stimulation. RESULTS: Temporary stimulation was successful in 35 patients (57.4 percent). A permanent neurostimulation device was implanted in 33 patients. Age was the only factor related to success of the temporary stimulation (P=0.03). After permanent implantation, 31 percent of patients did not attain screening phase results for the number of episodes of fecal incontinence or urgency. A neurologic disorder was more frequently the origin of fecal incontinence in the success group compared with others (P=0.03). The left bulbocavernosus reflex was more frequently delayed in the success group than in the others (P=0.03), and a prolonged or absent bulbocavernosus reflex was more frequent in the success group than in the failure group (P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with fecal incontinence from neurologic origins could be good candidates for sacral nerve stimulation.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

The safety and efficacy of the artificial bowel sphincter for fecal incontinence: results from a multicenter cohort study.

PURPOSE: The aim of this trial was to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and impact on quality of life of the Acticon trade mark artificial bowel sphincter for fecal incontinence. METHODS: A multicenter, prospective, nonrandomized clinical trial was conducted under a common protocol. Patients were evaluated with anal physiology, endoanal ultrasonography, a fecal incontinence scoring system, fecal incontinence quality of life assessment, and overall health evaluation. Patients with a fecal incontinence score of 88 or greater (scale, 1-120) were considered candidates for the study. Implanted patients underwent identical reevaluation at 6 and 12 months postimplant. RESULTS: One hundred twelve of 115 patients (86 females) enrolled were implanted. Mean age was 49 (range, 18-81) years. A total of 384 device-related or potentially device-related adverse events were reported in 99 enrolled patients. Of these events, 246 required no intervention or only noninvasive intervention. Seventy-three revisional operations were required in 51 (46 percent) of the 112 implanted patients. Infection rate necessitating surgical revision was 25 percent. Forty-one patients (37 percent) have had their devices completely explanted, of which 7 have had successful reimplantations. In patients with a functioning neosphincter, improvement in quality of life and anal continence was documented. Mean matched fecal incontinence scores in 63 patients at 6 months follow-up was improved from 105 preimplant to 51 postimplant. In 55 patients at 12 months follow-up, mean matched fecal incontinence scores were 105 preimplant 48 postimplant. A successful outcome was achieved in 85 percent of patients with a functioning device. Intention to treat success rate was 53 percent. CONCLUSIONS: Although morbidity and the need for revisional surgery are high, the artificial bowel sphincter can improve anal incontinence and quality of life in patients with severe fecal incontinence.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Sacral nerve stimulation for treatment of fecal incontinence in a patient with muscular dystrophy: report of a case.

Fecal incontinence is a common condition that causes major impairment of social life. Sacral nerve stimulation is a promising treatment in idiopathic fecal incontinence when conventional treatments have failed. However, new indications for sacral nerve stimulation are emerging. The present case shows that sacral nerve stimulation for treatment of fecal incontinence may be justified in other diseases in which fecal incontinence is a major problem.

Electric Stimulation Therapy↗
PubMed2004

Perineal puborectalis sling operation for fecal incontinence: preliminary report.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to evaluate the safety efficacy, and impact on quality of life of the perineal puborectalis sling operation for fecal incontinence. METHODS: Since August 2001, we performed the perineal puborectalis sling operation on eight patients with idiopathic fecal incontinence. A specially designed polyester mesh sling was introduced along the puborectalis muscle, from a posterior perianal incision, running to a small suprapubic incision. The ends were tied together with moderate tension. Patients were evaluated with the Fecal Incontinence Severity Index, the Cleveland Clinic Score of Incontinence, and the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale. Manometry and defecography were performed before and six months after the operation. RESULTS: Eight patients (7 females; mean age, 63 (range, 44-77) years) were evaluated. A wound infection developed in one patient, which subsided with antibiotics. A rectal ulcer developed in one patient, necessitating sling removal. In the remaining seven patients, the Fecal Incontinence Severity Index improved from 27 to 9, and the Cleveland Clinic Score of Incontinence improved from 13 to 5 (P < 0.05). All parameters in the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale improved: lifestyle from 2.1 to 3.6; coping/behavior from 1.5 to 3.4; depression/self perception from 2.3 to 3.7; and embarrassment from 2 to 3.6 (P < 0.05). No significant difference was found between preoperative and postoperative maximum resting pressure and maximum squeeze pressure. However, the median anorectal angle on defecography after the operation was significantly reduced (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We believe that the perineal puborectalis sling operation is technically feasible, with low morbidity, and can be an effective procedure for idiopathic fecal incontinence.

Anal Canal↗
PubMed2000

Randomized, controlled trial of topical phenylephrine for fecal incontinence in patients after ileoanal pouch construction.

INTRODUCTION: Fecal incontinence is experienced by some patients with an ileoanal reservoir pouch. The alpha1-adrenergic agonist phenylephrine raises resting anal sphincter pressure in healthy volunteers and may be of value in these patients. METHODS: Twelve patients (7 female), median age 44 (range, 29-67) years were studied. All had fecal incontinence despite a noninflamed pouch of normal size and ultrasonographically structurally normal anal sphincter muscles. Patients were treated with topical 10 percent phenylephrine and placebo gels, allocated in random order in a double-blind, crossover study for two four-week periods. Before and during treatment, maximum resting anal sphincter pressure and anodermal blood flow were measured, a symptom questionnaire was completed, and incontinence score was determined using a validated scale. RESULTS: Six of 12 (50 percent) patients improved subjectively after phenylephrine compared with one on placebo (P = 0.07). Four patients had complete cessation of incontinence with active treatment. Phenylephrine significantly reduced the incontinence score (P = 0.015). It also resulted in a significant rise in mean maximum resting anal sphincter pressure when compared with placebo (P = 0.012). For all 12 patients, mean percent subjective improvement was higher after phenylephrine compared with placebo (P = 0.04). There were no side effects. CONCLUSIONS: Topical phenylephrine significantly improves fecal continence in patients with an ileoanal pouch. In some patients it totally eliminates nocturnal episodes. The mechanism of benefit is likely to be one of altered neural sphincter control. This is the first study of the use of a topical pharmacologic agent to treat fecal incontinence and may have a wider application.

Administration, Topical↗
PubMed2003

Safety and effectiveness of temperature-controlled radio-frequency energy delivery to the anal canal (Secca procedure) for the treatment of fecal incontinence.

PURPOSE: This multicenter study evaluated the safety and efficacy of radio-frequency energy delivery to the anal canal for the treatment of fecal incontinence. METHODS: Fifty patients at five centers were enrolled. All reported fecal incontinence at least once per week for three months, and medical and/or surgical management failed to help their symptoms. At baseline and at six months, patients completed questionnaires (Cleveland Clinic Florida Fecal Incontinence score (0-20), fecal incontinence-related quality of life, Short Form-36, and visual analog scale) and underwent anorectal manometry, endoanal ultrasound, and pudendal nerve terminal motor latency testing. On an outpatient basis using local anesthesia, radio-frequency energy was delivered via an anoscopic device with multiple needle electrodes (Secca system) to create thermal lesions deep to the mucosa of the anal canal. RESULTS: Forty-three females and seven males (aged 61.1 +/- 13.4 (mean +/- standard deviation); range, 30-80 years) were treated. Mean duration of fecal incontinence was 14.9 years. Treatment time was 37 +/- 9 minutes. At six months, the mean Cleveland Clinic Florida Fecal Incontinence score improved from 14.5 to 11.1 (P < 0.0001). All parameters in the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life scales were improved (lifestyle (from 2.5-3.1; P < 0.0001); coping (from 1.9-2.4; P < 0.0001), depression (from 2.8-3.3; P = 0.0004); embarrassment (from 1.9-2.5; P < 0.0001)). Responders, as assessed by a systematic referenced analog scale, reported a median 70 percent resolution of symptoms. The mean Short Form-36 social function improved from 64.3 to 76 (P = 0.003). There were no changes in endoanal ultrasound or pudendal nerve terminal motor latency assessment, or in anal manometry. Complications included mucosal ulceration (one superficial, one with underlying muscle injury) and delayed bleeding (n = 1). CONCLUSION: This multicenter trial demonstrates that radio-frequency energy can be safely delivered to the lower rectum and anal canal. The Secca procedure significantly improved the Cleveland Clinic Florida Fecal Incontinence score and the overall quality of life for most patients having undergone the procedure.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Anal ultrasound predicts the response to nonoperative treatment of fecal incontinence in men.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the etiology, treatment, and utility of anal ultrasound in men with fecal incontinence and to review the outcomes of conservative (nonoperative) treatment. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The etiology of fecal incontinence in women is almost exclusively from obstetric or iatrogenic surgical injuries resulting in damage to the anal sphincters and/or pudendal nerves. Corresponding data on men with fecal incontinence are sparse. METHODS: Between January 1995 and January 1998, 37 men with fecal incontinence were evaluated in the John Radcliffe Hospital anorectal ultrasound unit. Their clinical histories, anal ultrasound results, anorectal physiology studies, and responses to conservative therapy were reviewed. RESULTS: Median age was 57 years. Major incontinence was present in 27% of the patients. Anal ultrasound localized anal sphincter damage in nine patients, and the characteristics of these nine patients with sphincter damage were then compared with the remaining 28 without sphincter damage. Prior anal surgery was more common in patients with sphincter damage. Hemorrhoids were more common in patients without sphincter damage. Anorectal physiology studies revealed significantly lower mean maximum resting and squeeze pressures in patients with sphincter damage, confirming poor sphincter function. With 92% follow-up, patients without sphincter damage were more likely to improve with nonoperative therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Anal ultrasound is extremely useful in the evaluation of fecal incontinence in men. Unlike women, the majority of men do not have a sphincter defect by anal ultrasound, and conservative management is usually successful in these patients. In contrast, in men with anal sphincter damage, almost all of these defects resulted from previous anal surgery. Conservative management rarely is successful in these cases, and surgical repair of the anal sphincter may be indicated. Therefore, because the presence or absence of sphincter damage on anal ultrasound usually predicts the response to nonoperative treatment, anal ultrasound should be used to guide the initial management of men with fecal incontinence.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

The prevalence of urinary and fecal incontinence in Canadian secondary school teenage girls: questionnaire study and review of the literature.

The purpose of this study was to examine the prevalence of pelvic floor dysfunction and incontinence in the Canadian nulligravid secondary school female teenage population. During the University of Toronto day in 1996, female visitors to the Obstetrics and Gynecology Department booth were asked to complete anonymous pelvic floor and continence questionnaires, which were thoroughly explained to them and completed during their visit. Out of the 332 completed forms, 69% were completed by nulligravid teenagers in secondary school. These students formed our study population. The prevalence of urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) symptoms was 17% and of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) symptoms was 15%. In all candidates these reported symptoms were mild, occurring less than once a week. Occasional minor fecal incontinence (involuntary loss of flatus or fecal staining) was 38%; of these, 92% reported loss of flatus. Major fecal incontinence with loose bowel movements was reported by 3% of the study population. Two girls (1%) reported nocturnal enuresis. Weight directly correlated with SUI symptoms and fecal incontinence, but not with UUI. Fecal incontinence correlated with SUI symptoms (P = 0.0152), but not with UUI. Ten per cent of the study population were sexually active, but sexual activity did not correlate with incontinence problems. Voiding habits were markedly variable: 30% were infrequent voiders (three times or fewer per day). Nocturia was reported by 3%. We concluded that in nulligravid teenage female students minor fecal incontinence appears to be the most common incontinence type; urge incontinence was slightly more common than SUI. Unlike UUI, SUI symptoms were more prevalent with fecal incontinence, which were affected by weight. There appears to be a problem with a high prevalence of poor voiding habits.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of fecal incontinence after acute brain injury: findings from the Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems national database.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the incidence, risk factors, and outcome in patients with fecal incontinence after acute brain injury. DESIGN: A retrospective study of the incidence of and risk factors contributing to fecal incontinence, and outcomes at admission to and discharge from inpatient rehabilitation and at 1-year follow-up. SETTING: Medical centers in the federally sponsored Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems (TBIMS). PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1,013 consecutively enrolled rehabilitation inpatients from 17 TBIMS centers who were admitted to acute care within 24 hours of traumatic brain injury and seen at 1-year postinjury between 1990 and 2000. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of fecal incontinence, length of coma, length of posttraumatic amnesia (PTA), admission Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, length of stay (LOS), FIM instrument scores, disposition at discharge and follow-up, and incidences of pelvic fracture, frontal contusion, and urinary tract infection (UTI). RESULTS: The incidence of fecal incontinence was 68% at admission to inpatient rehabilitation, 12.4% at rehabilitation discharge, and 5.2% at 1-year follow-up. Analysis of variance and chi-square analyses revealed statistically significant associations between the incidence of fecal incontinence at rehabilitation admission and admission GCS score, length of coma and PTA, LOS, and incidence of UTI and frontal contusion. Fecal incontinence at rehabilitation discharge was significantly associated with several variables, including age, discharge disposition, admission GCS score, length of coma, PTA, LOS, FIM scores, and incidence of pelvic fracture and frontal contusion. Significant associations were also found between fecal incontinence at 1-year follow-up and age, discharge and current 1-year disposition, admission GCS score, length of coma, LOS, FIM scores, and incidence of UTI (P<.05). Although logistic regression analyses were significant (P<.001), and predicted continence with 100% accuracy, demographics, injury characteristics, medical complications, and functional outcomes did not predict incontinence at discharge and at 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Fecal incontinence is a significant problem after brain injury. Certain factors may increase its likelihood. Further studies evaluating mechanisms of fecal incontinence and treatment or control interventions would be useful.

Amnesia↗