Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “FLUOROURACIL”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 145 records · Page 8Linked to original sources
PubMed1980

Treatment of advanced colon cancer with 5-fluorouracil (NSC19893) versus cyclophosphamide (NSC26271) plus 5-fluorouracil: prognostic aspects of the differential white blood cell count.

One hundred twenty-one patients with advanced measurable adenocarcinoma of the colon were randomized for treatment with intravenous 5-fluorouracil (IV 5-FU) alone, 15 mg/kg/week vs. cytoxan, 15 mg/kg/week IV, on day 1 and 5-FU, 15 mg/kg/week IV during weeks 2--5, repeated in a six-week cycle. Age, sex, performance status, and disease free intervals, were comparable in both arms. Response frequency was 11% for treatment with 5-FU alone and 10% for treatment with combination therapy. The median survival time was significantly greater in the 5-FU-alone arm (8.4 months vs. 5.6 months, P less than 0.05). In both arms, survival was correlated with the nadir white blood count (WBC) achieved during therapy (P less than 0.02). Fourteen patients had pretreatment WBC of greater than 12,000/mm3. None of them had fever, bone marrow involvement with tumor, or recognizable infection at study entry. The 14 patients had a median survival time of 2.3 months, significantly shorter than that of patients with normal pretreatment WBC (P less than 0.05). A pretreatment lymphocyte count was available for all patients. No association between this value and either response to chemotherapy or survival time was noted. These results support the superiority of 5-FU to the combination of 5-FU and cytoxan in the treatment of colon carcinoma, and point to the prognostic significance of the pretreatment WBC in this disease.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1980

Treatment of women with disseminated or recurrent advanced ovarian cancer with melphalan alone in combination with 5-fluorouracil and dactinomycin or with the combination of cytoxan, 5-fluorouracil and dactinomycin.

The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of single and multiple drug chemotherapeutic regimens in the treatment of patients with advanced or recurrent, Stage III and IV, ovarian epithelial carcinoma. Patients were randomly assigned to one of four treatment regimens postoperatively, or at the time of recurrence: Regimen I--Melphalan (MEL) 0.2 mg/kg/day for five days every four weeks; regimen II--MEL as in Regimen I plus 5-fluorouracil (FU) 15 mg/kg/day for five days every four weeks; regimen III--MEL and FU as in regimen II plus dactinomycin (AC) 0.5 mg daily for five days every four weeks; and regimen IV--Cytoxan (CY) 7 mg/kg/day, FU 8 mg/kg/day and AC 0.5 mg/day for five days every four weeks. Four hundred and twenty-seven patients were in the study, 314 of whom are evaluable for progression-free interval (PFI), survival, and toxicity: 102 in regimen I, 80 in regimen II, 83 in regimen III, and 49 in regimen IV. Of these, 293 were considered evaluable for response. Because of excessive toxicity, entry of patients to regimen IV was discontinued midway through the study. The overall toxicity was quite high but was most severe in regimen II and IV where 16 toxicity deaths were recorded. The complete and partial response rate with Melphalan alone was 29.2%. This response rate was not enhanced by the addition of FU or FU and AC and not substantially different than the response rate of AC, FU, and CY.

Cyclophosphamide↗
PubMed1981

Therapy of locally unresectable pancreatic carcinoma: a randomized comparison of high dose (6000 rads) radiation alone, moderate dose radiation (4000 rads + 5-fluorouracil), and high dose radiation + 5-fluorouracil: The Gastrointestinal Tumor Study Group.

One-hundred-ninety-four eligible and evaluable patients with histologically confirmed locally unresectable adenocarcinoma of the pancreas were randomly assigned to therapy with high-dose (6000 rads) radiation therapy alone, to moderate-dose (4000 rads) radiation + 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and to high-dose radiation plus 5-FU. Median survival with radiation alone was only 51/2 months from date of diagnosis. Both 5-FU-containing treatment regimens produced a highly significant survival improvement when compared with radiation alone. Forty percent of patients treated with the combined regimens were still living at one year compared with 10% of patients treated with radiation only. Survival differences between 4000 rads plus 5-FU and 6000 rads plus 5-FU were not significant with an overall median survival of ten months. Significant prognostic variables, in addition to treatment, were pretreatment performance status and pretreatment CEA level.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1986

5-Fluorouracil chemotherapy and pelvic radiation in the treatment of large bowel cancer. Decreased toxicity in combined treatment with 5-fluorouracil administration through the intraperitoneal route.

Multimodality cancer therapy commonly involves the interactions of surgeon, radiation therapist, and medical oncologist. This prospective study was undertaken to record possible adverse effects of surgery, external beam radiation therapy, and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) chemotherapy in the treatment of large bowel cancer. The dose of 5-FU by the intraperitoneal (IP) or intravenous (IV) routes was diminished when pelvic radiation therapy was given. The reduction in drug dose that was required was much greater when 5-FU was given IV as compared to IP. The proportion of patients remaining on IV 5-FU chemotherapy was significantly reduced when the patient received pelvic radiation. There was a significant increase in leukopenia and thrombocytopenia when patients received pelvic radiation. Hematologic toxicity was more severe when there was IV compared with IP administration of 5-FU. Pelvic radiation therapy diminished the patient's capacity to receive chemotherapy because of hematologic toxicity. The locoregional administration of 5-FU chemotherapy was better tolerated as part of a multimodality treatment regimen than was systemic administration.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗
PubMed1994

Randomized comparison of fluorouracil and leucovorin therapy versus fluorouracil, leucovorin, and cisplatin therapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Because of experimental and preliminary clinical evidence that additional modulation of the biochemical pharmacology and cytotoxicity of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) may be possible by combination of these agents with cisplatin (CDDP), the authors undertook a prospective randomized trial in patients with colorectal cancer. METHODS: Between 1989 and 1992, 138 patients with advanced measurable colorectal cancer previously unexposed to chemotherapy were randomly assigned to treatment with either 5-FU (425 mg/m2) and LV (20 mg/m2) for 5 days, or the combination of 5-FU and LV in the same daily dose plus cisplatin (20 mg/m2), each drug given for 4 consecutive days. In both treatment arms, courses were administered every 28 days, if toxicity allowed, for a total of 6 months or until evidence of tumor progression. RESULTS: The overall responses (complete and partial response) were 19% and 28% for the 5-FU/LV and the 5-FU/LV/CDDP treatment arms, respectively. Although the three-drug combination appeared superior to 5-FU/LV for time to progression or death (8.5 versus 5.2 months; P = 0.042), there was no evidence that the adoption of cisplatin will translate into a definite survival advantage. A comparative analysis of the toxicities experienced by the patients in the two treatment groups showed a comparable rate, although severe side effects (P < 0.05), specifically stomatitis (P = 0.013), were noticed more frequently in patients treated with 5-FU/LV for 5 days. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the therapeutic index of 5-FU/LV in metastatic colorectal cancer may be improved with the addition of cisplatin. However, the somewhat better therapeutic activity and lower incidence of severe gastrointestinal side effects have to be weighed against additional pharmaceutical charges and the need for a more intense antiemetic regimen.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Randomized phase III study of 5-fluorouracil plus high dose folinic acid versus 5-fluorouracil plus folinic acid plus methyl-lomustine for patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Metastatic colorectal cancer is generally incurable. The most active regimen available, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and folinic acid (Leucovorin), produces response rates of approximately 25% to 30%. Methyl-lomustine is a nitrosourea with modest activity against colorectal cancer. A randomized trial was undertaken to evaluate the impact the addition of methyl-lomustine would have on response, duration of survival, and survival rates in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. METHODS: The methyl-lomustine/5-FU/Leucovorin (MFL) regimen consisted of methyl-lomustine (110 mg/m2), administered on Day 1 of each 8-week cycle with six weekly boluses of 5-FU (600 mg/m2), and Leucovorin (500 mg/m2). The FL treatment arm consisted of the administration of 5-FU and Leucovorin as described above. Patients were evaluated for response and toxicity after each 8-week cycle. RESULTS: Of 319 patients included in this trial, 297 (93.1%) had disease evaluable for response and toxicity: 145 received MFL, and 152 received FL. In this trial, 526 courses of MFL and 529 courses of FL were administered. Methyl-lomustine/5-FU/Leucovorin treatment resulted in 4 complete and 30 partial responses (response rate, 21.9%), and FL treatment resulted in 9 complete and 33 partial responses (response rate, 26.4%). There was no significant difference in median survival duration between patients in the two arms (MFL = 48 weeks, FL = 51 weeks). However, MFL was significantly more toxic with greater myelosuppression than was FL (Grade 3-4 neutropenia: MFL = 56 patients, FL = 27 patients, P < 0.001; Grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia: MFL = 49 patients, FL = 2 patients, P < 0.001; Grade 3-4 anemia: MFL = 15 patients, FL = 6 patients, P < 0.001; and more prolonged median duration of granulocytopenia: MFL = 9 days, FL = 7 days, P < 0.001; and thrombocytopenia: MFL = 14 days, FL = 7.5 days, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Because the addition of methyl-lomustine in the MFL schedule markedly increased the toxicity of the regimen and because the FL regimen was as effective as MFL, the authors recommend that Leucovorin and 5-FU remain the treatment choice for treating patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Phase II study of combined 5-fluorouracil/ Ginkgo biloba extract (GBE 761 ONC) therapy in 5-fluorouracil pretreated patients with advanced colorectal cancer.

The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy, tolerability and quality of life in 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) pretreated colorectal cancer patients after combined 5-FU and Ginkgo biloba extract GBE 761 ONC (i.e. the Ginkgo biloba special extract EGb 761(R)) therapy. Following conventional 5-FU therapy, 44 patients (32 evaluable for response) with advanced progressive colorectal cancer were treated every 3 weeks with courses of 350 mg GBE 761 ONC as a 30 min i.v. infusion on days 1-6 followed by 500 mg/m(2)/d 5-FU as a 30 min i.v. infusion on days 2-6. The response to therapy was evaluated after the second and fourth course of treatment. The data of 32 patients could be evaluated for efficacy. We observed a progression of disease in 22 patients, no change in 8 patients and a partial response in 2 patients (overall response = 6.3%). Seventeen of 22 patients with observed progressive disease showed further progression after two cycles, two after three cycles and three after four cycles. The median survival time was 9.5 months (7.7-11.5 months). GBE 761 ONC was well tolerated. Adverse events that occurred during the study were mainly myelosuppression and gastrointestinal symptoms and were judged to be 5-FU related or consistent with liver toxicity and thus tumour related. Our results suggest a good benefit-risk ratio of the combined 5-FU and GBE 761 ONC therapy as second line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer. The survival time was similar to that known from second line treatment according to the Ardalan scheme. Since an improvement was observed in some patients despite the failure of the conventional 5-FU pretreatment, it would be interesting to evaluate whether the application of 5-FU plus GBE 761 ONC as a first line treatment is of benefit.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed2005

Cost-effectiveness projections of oxaliplatin and infusional fluorouracil versus irinotecan and bolus fluorouracil in first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The results of a randomized comparison study (N9741) showed that oxaliplatin and infusional fluorouracil (FU) (FOLFOX) was superior to the previous standard of care in the United States, irinotecan and bolus FU (IFL), as first-line therapy for patients with metastatic colon carcinoma. The trade-offs between costs and survival for these two regimens have not been explored. METHODS: A post-hoc, incremental cost-effectiveness (ICE) projection using simulated cohorts of patients starting FOLFOX or IFL was tracked for major clinical events, toxicities, and survival. Recurrence and survival risks were based on clinical trial data. Resource use was projected using observed dose intensity, duration of therapy, delays in therapy, and toxicities Grade > 2 in N9741. The frequency, costs, and consequences of second-line therapy were examined. The time frame was 5 years, and the perspective was that of Medicare as a third-party payer. RESULTS: Initial treatment with FOLFOX versus IFL had an average incremental cost of dollars 29,523, a survival benefit of 4.4 months, and an ICE of dollars 80,410 per life year (LY), dollars 111,890 per quality-adjusted LY, and dollars 89,080 per progression-free year. By using the 95% confidence interval for the time to progression observed in N9741, the ICE associated with FOLFOX ranged from dollars 121,220 to dollars 59,250 per LY. In the clinical trial, dose delays and skipped doses were frequent. If progression-free patients were treated without delay for the first year or lifetime, then the ICE for FOLFOX increased to dollars 117,910 and dollars 222,200 per LY, respectively. The ICE increased to dollars 84,780 per LY when the model incorporated a revised IFL schedule with lower early toxicity and similar rates of treatment with second-line regimens. CONCLUSIONS: FOLFOX provided substantial benefits that incurred substantial additional costs. The ICE for FOLFOX fell into the upper range of commonly accepted oncology interventions in the context of the United States healthcare system.

Age Factors↗
PubMed2006

Prognostic impact of orotate phosphoribosyl transferase among 5-fluorouracil metabolic enzymes in resectable colorectal cancers treated by oral 5-fluorouracil-based adjuvant chemotherapy.

Orotate phosphoribosyl transferase (OPRT) is the main enzyme that involves in phosphoribosylation of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), an essential step that leads to tumor growth inhibition. In our study, the prognostic relevance of OPRT, thymidylate synthase (TS) and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) in resectable colorectal cancer (CRC) patients treated by oral 5-FU were compared to further clarify the prognostic value of OPRT. Tumor tissue was collected from 90 CRC patients and the patients were followed for 5.2 years (Median). TS, DPD and OPRT activities in the extract of tumor tissue were determined enzymatically. The cut-off value of OPRT (0.147 nmol/(min mg), TS (0.044 pmol/mg) and DPD (72.10 pmol/(min mg) were determined by maximal chi(2) method. Among these 5-FU metabolic enzymes, only high OPRT group demonstrated significantly better disease-free survival (DFS) (p = 0.0152) and better overall survival (p = 0.0078). In Cox regression analysis, node status (p < 0.0005) and OPRT (p = 0.044) were significant factors for DFS. OPRT activity in tumor tissue was a predictor of prognosis in resectable CRC patients treated by oral 5-FU-based adjuvant chemotherapy, and was useful to pick-up high risk patients independent from known prognosis factors.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Randomized study with mitomycin C + 5-fluorouracil+cytosine arabinoside (MFC)+5-fluorouracil, MFC+tegafur and uracil (UFT), and MF+UFT in advanced gastric cancer: interinstitutional differences in a multicenter study in Japan.

In a phase III randomized trial of adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer, interinstitutional differences were analyzed. A trial of three regimens: mitomycin C, 5-fluorouracil(5-FU) and CA (MFC) + continuous oral 5-FU (Group C); MFC + continuous oral UFT(tegafur and uracil) (Group B); and MF + UFT (Group C) after operation was conducted in 466 patients with gastric cancer (stage II and III) at four hospitals in Japan (CIH, CAD, ACC and NCC). Patients were stratified by the institution, stage, and tumor size (8 cm ><). The 5-year survival rates were in the order of Group A (79.0%) > B (70.0%) > C (61.0%) (P = 0.1228) in total, A (95.0%) > B (80.0%) > C (58.0%) (P < 0.05) at CAD (82 patients), A > C > B at CIH (215), C > A > B at ACC (95), and B > A > C at NCC (78). The survival rate of patients with S2(serosal exposure), 8 cm < and N0-1 cancer was higher at CIH than at the other institutions. The interinstitutional differences in patient characteristics and surgical technique were more powerful than the differences among the three groups.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1995

A phase III randomized trial of cyclophosphamide, mitoxantrone, and 5-fluorouracil (CNF) versus cyclophosphamide, adriamycin, and 5-fluorouracil (CAF) in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

One hundred patients with metastatic breast cancer were randomly selected to receive combined chemotherapy treatment with adriamycin (50 mg/m2) or mitoxantrone (12 mg/m2) associated with 5-fluorouracil (600 mg/m2) and cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2) administered intravenously every 21 days with a maximum of ten cycles. All patients included in this study were under 75 years of age and had ECOG performance status of less than 4. They had not been treated previously with chemotherapy for metastatic disease. Patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy, which could not have included anthracyclines, had to have relapsed at least 12 months after the completion of therapy. There were no statistically significant differences in pretreatment characteristics or metastatic disease location between the two groups. Ninety-four patients were assessable for response. No differences were observed in response rate or in survival between the groups. The response rate (complete response (CR) and partial response (PR)) was 68% (13% CR and 55% PR for CAF; 0% CR and 68% PR for CNF). Median survival for all patients was 19 months (18 months with CAF and 19 months with CNF). All patients were assessable for toxicity. There were no differences in gastrointestinal and cardiac toxicity. More grade I-II hematologic toxicity episodes (p < 0.001) and treatment delays (p = 0.05) due to leucopenia were observed with the CNF group, and more grade III alopecia (p < 0.001) was observed with the CAF group. Patients received further therapeutic manoeuvres after finishing the study with a sequential treatment consisting of hormonal therapy and chemotherapy with mitomycin (M) -vinblastine (Vbl) (M 10 mg/m2 day 1, Vbl 5 mg/m2 days 1, 15 and 29; maximum 5 cycles). This chemotherapy treatment was received by 32 patients, with a response rate of 34% and grade III-IV hematologic toxicity of 37%. Treatment with CNF can be considered a good alternative to CAF for first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer. M-Vbl treatment is useful as second-line treatment in patients with prior adriamycin exposure.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Activity of continuous-infusion 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced colorectal cancer clinically resistant to bolus 5-fluorouracil.

We have recently demonstrated that continuous-infusion (CI) 5-fluorouracil (FU) eradicates human colon carcinoma cells made resistant to bolus FU in vitro. In addition, in the same experimental system, the mechanisms of resistance to pulse and CI FU were found to be different. These observations led us to test the clinical activity of a standard regimen of CI FU (300 mg/m2 per day) in a cohort of 15 patients with advanced measurable colorectal cancer who were in progression after having failed to respond to bolus treatment with FU alone (3 patients) or FU combined with high-dose 6-S-leucovorin (LV) (12 patients). The median age of the patients was 68 years, and their median Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) was 1. No myelotoxicity was observed. Mild diarrhea, mucositis, and vomiting occurred in 32%, 26%, and 19% of the patients, respectively, with no WHO grade 3 or 4 episodes being noted. In all, 6 of 15 patients complained of hand-foot syndrome, which was severe in 2 instances, lasting approximately 1 week. Overall, 1 partial response and 6 instances of disease stabilization, including 3 minor responses, were obtained both in patients who had been pretreated with pulse FU alone and in patients who had failed first-line treatment with FU + LV. Finally, 8 patients failed CI FU. In conclusion, these results, obtained in patients who were clearly progressing after having failed first-line treatment, support our experimental finding that resistance to bolus FU may be overcome by CI FU and extend this possibility to patients who are resistant to bolus treatment with FU + LV.

Aged↗
PubMed1994

Plasma 5-fluorouracil and alpha-fluoro-beta-alanin accumulation in lung cancer patients treated with continuous infusion of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil.

This study was undertaken to investigate the day-to-day pharmacokinetic variability of 5-fluorouracil (5FU) given as a continuous i.v. infusion concomitantly with cisplatin. Ten lung cancer patients were investigated during the first course of chemotherapy. All patients had advanced, previously untreated, inoperable non-small-cell lung cancer. They received continuous infusions of cisplatin given at 100 mg/m2 over 5 days and of 5FU given at 1 g/m2 daily from day 2 to day 5. Both drugs were infused i.v. for 24 h/day at a constant rate with a volumetric pump. Blood samples were drawn from day 2 to day 5, every 4 h from 8 a.m. to 8 p.m. and every 2 h during the night (8 p.m. to 8 a.m.). Plasma 5FU and FBAL concentrations were determined simultaneously by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Plasma 5FU concentrations varied widely over the 4-day treatment course for each patient. Despite continuous constant-rate 5FU administration, plasma 5FU concentrations were significantly lower between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m. than during the night. Mean plasma concentrations of 5FU and FBAL increased significantly from the 1st day (0.42 and 1.19 micrograms/ml for 5FU and FBAL, respectively) to the 4th day of 5FU infusion (0.67 and 1.78 micrograms/ml for 5FU and FBAL, respectively). Further study is warranted to elucidate the mechanisms of the observed increase in plasma 5FU concentrations as well as its relationship with cisplatin coadministration and to assess the clinical relevance of this plasma 5FU accumulation.

Aged↗
PubMed1989

Phase II trial of 5-fluorouracil, adriamycin and cisplatin (FAP) followed by radiation and 5-fluorouracil in locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

A total of 19 patients (7 men, 12 women) with locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma were treated with six cycles of FAP (5-fluorouracil, 300 mg/m2 i.v. on days 1-5; Adriamycin, 50 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1; cisplatin, 20 mg/m2 i.v. on days 1-5). Each course was repeated every 28 days. After six cycles, the treatment was followed by irradiation amounting to 4,000 cGy (split course) in combination with 5-FU (500 mg/m2) on days 1-3 of the two irradiation periods. The median age of our patients was 55 years (range, 40-64 years). The median WHO performance status was 1, with a range of 0-2. Three (16%) complete (CR) and six (31%) partial responses (PR) were observed, as were six cases of stable disease (SD) and four of progressive disease (PD). The median duration of response was 11 months, with a range of 4-24 months, and the median survival was 14 months (range, 5-27 + months). FAP toxicity was tolerated fairly poorly. The dose-limiting toxic effect was myelosuppression, with a mean WBC nadir of WHO grade 1.6 (range, 0-3) and a mean platelet count of WHO grade 1.1 (range, 0-4). Nausea and vomiting were not dose-limiting. Complete alopecia was seen in 14/19 patients. Neuropathy was mild (WHO grade 1) in seven and moderate (grade 2) in four. Irradiation in combination with 5-FU was generally well tolerated. Due to several reasons, only ten patients could be treated with all six cycles of FAP. We conclude that in future combined modality studies, irradiation should be given after three cycles of chemotherapy, and that combined modality treatment for locally advanced pancreatic cancer is feasible and warrants further testing.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

5-fluorouracil vs. epirubicin vs. 5-fluorouracil plus epirubicin in advanced gastric carcinoma.

From January, 1985, through January, 1987, 165 patients with advanced gastric cancer were randomized to receive epirubicin (E) alone (90 mg/m2 day 1), 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) alone (500 mg/m2 days 1-5), or the combination of E (90 mg/m2 day 1) and 5-FU (400 mg/m2 days 1-5). Courses were repeated every four weeks. Patients were stratified by extent (locally advanced vs. metastatic), evaluability (measurable vs. nonmeasurable) and by history of prior radiotherapy (yes vs. no). Randomization to single arm epirubicin was stopped after 26 patients were enrolled. Objective responses occurred in only 1/16 (6%) of the patients treated with E alone, 1/40 (5%) with 5-FU alone and 4/33 (12%) with both 5-FU and E. There were no significant differences in all eligible patients with respect to time to progression or overall survival in the three treatment arms. Toxicity was primarily hematologic and more pronounced in the combination arm. Neither 5-FU alone, epirubicin alone, or the combination have a major impact in the treatment of gastric carcinoma.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2002

Severe 5-fluorouracil toxicity associated with a marked alteration of pharmacokinetics of 5-fluorouracil and its catabolite 5-fluoro-5,6-dihydrouracil: a case report.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the altered pharmacokinetics of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and its major catabolite 5-fluoro-5,6-dihydrouracil (5-FDHU) in a 52-year-old woman affected by a severe 5-FU toxicity. METHODS: Toxicities were rated according to World Health Organization. 5-FU and 5-FDHU plasma concentrations and dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) activity of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were measured by HPLC analysis. RESULTS: After a single cycle of 5-FU therapy the patient developed grade 4 diarrhea and stomatitis, grade 3 vomiting, neutropenia, and dermatitis. Compared to a control population, 5-FU AUC, elimination half-life, and C(max) were markedly increased (24.75 vs. 9.25 +/- 0.63 h microg/ml, >5 vs. 0.36 +/- 0.05 h, and 58.54 vs. 37.2 +/- 4.03 microg/ml, respectively) whereas systemic clearance was decreased (12 vs. 51.29 +/- 2.97 l/h/m2); also 5-FDHU AUC (3.3 vs. 12.35 +/- 0.7 h microg/ml) and C(max) (3.4 vs. 4.56 +/- 0.15 microg/ml), which was reached with delay, were reduced. Surprisingly, the PBMC DPD activity (110.8 pmol/min/mg protein) and urinary uracil (68.32 micromol/g urinary creatinine) were within normal range. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show the altered 5-FU and 5-FDHU pharmacokinetics in a severe 5-FU toxicity case due to an impairment of the hepatic DPD activity and suggest the necessity of a pharmacological evaluation of 5-FU treated patients.

Alopecia↗
PubMed1997

Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase inactivation and 5-fluorouracil pharmacokinetics: allometric scaling of animal data, pharmacokinetics and toxicodynamics of 5-fluorouracil in humans.

UNLABELLED: The pharmacokinetics of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in different animal species treated with the dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) inactivator, 5-ethynyluracil (776C85) were related through allometric scaling. Estimates of 5-FU dose in combination with 776C85 were determined from pharmacokinetic and toxicodynamic analysis. METHOD: The pharmacokinetics of 5-FU in the DPD-deficient state were obtained from mice, rats and dogs treated with 776C85 followed by 5-FU. The pharmacokinetics of 5-FU in humans were then estimated using interspecies allometric scaling. Data related to the clinical toxicity for 5-FU were obtained from the literature. The predicted pharmacokinetics of 5-FU and the clinical toxicity data were then used to estimate the appropriate dose of 5-FU in combination with 776C85 in clinical trials. RESULTS: The allometric equation relating total body clearance (CL) of 5-FU to the body weight (B) (CL = 0.47B0.74) indicates that clearance increased disproportionately with body weight. In contrast, the apparent volume of distribution (Vc) increased proportionately with body weight (Vc = 0.58 B0.99). Based on allometric analysis, the estimated clearance of 5-FU (10.9 l/h) in humans with DPD deficiency was comparable to the observed values in humans lacking DPD activity due to genetic predisposition (10.1 l/h), or treatment with 776C85 (7.0 l/h) or (E)-5-(2-bromovinyl)-2'-deoxyuridine (BVdUrd, 6.6 l/h). The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of 5-FU in combination with 776C85 was predicted from literature data relating toxicity and plasma 5-FU area under the concentration-time curve (AUC). Based on allometric analysis, the estimated values for the MTD in humans treated with 776C85 and receiving 5-FU as a single i.v. bolus dose, and 5-day and 12-day continuous infusions were about 110, 50 and 30 mg/m2 of 5-FU, respectively. DISCUSSION: The pharmacokinetics of 5-FU in the DPD-deficient state in humans can be predicted from animal data. A much smaller dose of 5-FU is needed in patients treated with 776C85.

Animals↗
PubMed1999

Protracted continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil and low-dose leucovorin in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer resistant to 5-fluorouracil bolus-based chemotherapy: a phase II study.

Continuous-infusion (c.i.) 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) can overcome resistance to bolus 5-FU, and leucovorin (LV) enhances the cytotoxic effects of 5-FU, mainly when the duration of exposure to the latter is prolonged. The main objective of this study was therefore to determine the activity of a prolonged infusion schedule of 5-FU + LV in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer resistant to a 5-FU bolus-based chemotherapy. Only patients with metastatic measurable disease in progression during or within 2 months of the end of a 5-FU bolus +/- LV-based chemotherapy were eligible for the study. 5-FU and l-LV were given as a 14-day c.i. every 28 days, the 5-FU dose being 200 mg/m2 per day and the l-LV dose being 5 mg/m2 per day. A total of 59 patients entered the study, of which 48 were resistant to 5-FU + LV and 11, to 5-FU + levamisole. Treatment was well tolerated, and WHO grade 3-4 toxicities were uncommon (11% of patients developed stomatitis and 7%, diarrhea). According to an intent-to-treat analysis, 10 of 59 patients obtained an objective response (1 complete response, 9 partial responses), for an objective response rate of 16% (95% confidence interval 8-25%). The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 4 and 9 months, respectively. The protracted 5-FU + LV c.i. schedule used in the present study is a well-tolerated and moderately active regimen in metastatic colorectal cancer patients resistant to 5-FU bolus +/- LV. Only randomized studies can determine whether this palliative treatment has advantages in comparison with other second-line therapies such as 5-FU c.i. without LV, irinotecan, or oxaliplatin.

Adult↗