Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Disease modifying”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 145 records · Page 8Linked to original sources
PubMed2005

A two year randomised controlled trial of intramuscular depot steroids in patients with established rheumatoid arthritis who have shown an incomplete response to disease modifying antirheumatic drugs.

BACKGROUND: In rheumatoid arthritis (RA), intramuscular (IM) pulsed depomedrone expedites an immediate response to disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Although IM depomedrone is also widely used to treat disease flares in patients treated with DMARDs, its effect on radiological progression has not been assessed. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the benefits of 120 mg IM depomedrone versus placebo in patients with established RA whose disease was inadequately controlled by existing DMARDs. METHODS: In a 2 year prospective randomised controlled trial patients were assessed using the ILAR/WHO core dataset, disease activity score (DAS28), x ray examination of hands and feet scored by Larsen's method, and bone densitometry. RESULTS: 291 patients with RA were screened, 166 were eligible, and 91 consented and were randomised. Disease activity improved more rapidly in the steroid treated patients than with placebo, but after 6 months no difference remained. A small but significant reduction in erosive damage in the steroid group compared with placebo was also found. More adverse reactions occurred in the steroid treated group than in the placebo patients (55 v 42), especially those reactions traditionally related to steroids (16 v 2), including vertebral fracture, diabetes, and myocardial infarction. Hip bone density fell significantly in steroid treated but not placebo patients. CONCLUSIONS: IM depomedrone improved disease activity in the short term and produced a small reduction in bone erosion at the cost of a significant increase in adverse events. Despite the initial benefit of IM depomedrone, when patients respond suboptimally to a DMARD they should not be given long term additional steroids but should be treated with alternative or additional DMARDs.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Adherence to disease-modifying therapy in multiple sclerosis: Part II.

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic, debilitating disease for which there is no cure; however, the recent introduction of injectable immunomodulating agents has reduced the rate of relapsing episodes and possibly slowed the progression of the disease. These disease-modifying agents are recommended by the National MS Society, but their true potential cannot be realized if patients do not accept them and healthcare professionals do not promote them. Since MS has an unpredictable course, and treatments can produce side effects, adherence to the recommended therapy is a complex and challenging issue. Improved understanding of the obstacles to adherence and the identification of possible solutions should be of value to nurses, who have numerous opportunities to encourage patients to initiate and continue therapy. Part I of this article, published in the September/October 2001 issue of Rehabilitation Nursing, described the particular problems of treatment adherence in MS. Part II proposes that the transtheoretical model of behavior change can be a useful tool in achieving both patient acceptance and treatment goals. This model is founded upon the concept that readiness for change is crucial, and that attempts at intervention should be sensitive to the patients' changing conditions and states of mind.

Humans↗
PubMed1988

Studies on the effects of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs on lipoxygenase product synthesis in human neutrophils in vitro.

The disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs sodium aurothiomalate, D-penicillamine and chloroquine phosphate were tested on leukotriene (LT) synthesis in human blood polymorphonuclear leukocytes stimulated with either the ionophore A23187, zymosan or f-Met-Leu-Phe. Lipoxygenase products were analyzed by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. The study demonstrated that the drugs can either inhibit or enhance 5-lipoxygenase product synthesis in human leukocytes, depending on the stimulus used to activate the cells and the drug concentration. The data also suggested that increased substrate availability accounted for the stimulatory effects of the drugs on leukotriene synthesis.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal↗
PubMed2005

Conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in early arthritis.

This article reviews the use of conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in the treatment of early rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The Finnish early RA cohorts are used as examples of how early and active treatment strategies have improved over time with increasing variety of available DMARDs. Therapy goals of early RA include remission to prevent severe long-term outcomes of RA. Remission can be achieved in a third of patients with early RA using a combination of conventional DMARDs, including methotrexate, sulfasalazine, hydroxychloroquine, and prednisolone. Of patients with early RA, 20% to 30% do not improve enough with conventional treatments and should be identified at early phases to consider institution of biologic agents.

Antirheumatic Agents↗
PubMed2001

Adverse reactions to disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs in clinical practice.

We analysed computerized records of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) monotherapy to determine how long rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients continued on five commonly prescribed DMARDs, and the incidence and time-course of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) they experienced. We studied the records for 3923 courses of DMARDs given to a cohort of 2170 patients monitored for a total of 9378 treatment-years. Methotrexate (MTX) was the DMARD most likely to be continued long-term; <45% of patients had discontinued the drug after 96 months. For the other DMARDs, the time until 50% discontinued due to ADRs or inefficacy was 43.3 months for sulphasalazine (SAS), 33.9 months for D-penicillamine (DPN) and 26 months for myocrisin. Most monitored ADRs requiring drug discontinuation were seen early in therapy, with a median time to onset of <6 months; the important exceptions to this were haematological ADRs to MTX, where the median delay to neutropenia was 16.9 months, and that to thrombocytopenia was 9.4 months. Monitored ADRs (identified by blood or urine tests) were seen least frequently with SAS (one ADR in every 35 patient-years of monitoring) but this apparent advantage was offset by a high incidence of gastrointestinal ADRs and inefficacy. Overall, one toxicity reaction requiring drug discontinuation was identified for every 15.9 patient-years of monitoring.

Antirheumatic Agents↗
PubMed2004

Benefit of very early referral and very early therapy with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: Delay of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy is a major contributing factor for poor outcome in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Although early therapy has been shown to be particularly effective, there is still uncertainty about the optimal time point of DMARD introduction. We wanted to test if a therapeutic window of opportunity may exist within the first few months of the disease. METHODS: In this case-control parallel-group study, 20 very early RA (VERA) patients with median disease duration of 3 months were age and gender matched to a group of 20 late early RA (LERA) patients with median disease duration of 12 months until first DMARD initiation. Follow-up time was 36 months. Primary outcome measures were the disease activity score (DAS28) and radiological joint destruction using the Larsen method. RESULTS: Already after 3 months of DMARD therapy we found a significant difference of improvement in favour of the VERA patients in the DAS28. This trend continued over the study period. At study end the DAS28 showed an improvement of 2.8+/-1.5 in the VERA vs 1.7+/-1.2 in the LERA group (P(c)<0.05). The Larsen scores showed a statistically significant retardation of progression in the VERA compared with the LERA. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that there is a window of opportunity for highly successful treatment of RA in the first year, and especially within the first 3 months of therapy. Thus, early diagnosis and therapy may be the crucial step in achieving optimal control of disease progression and prognosis in RA.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2006

Real-world utilization of DMARDs and biologics in rheumatoid arthritis: the RADIUS (Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drug Intervention and Utilization Study) study.

OBJECTIVE: Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drug (DMARD) Intervention and Utilization Study (RADIUS) is a unique, real-world, prospective, 5-year, observational study of over 10 000 patients with RA. RADIUS provides a snapshot of use patterns, effectiveness, and safety of DMARDs, biologics, and combination therapies used to manage RA in clinical practice. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients with RA requiring a new DMARD or biologic (addition or switch) were eligible for the RADIUS study. Two separate patient cohorts were enrolled; RADIUS 1 patients initiated any new therapy at entry, and RADIUS 2 patients initiated etanercept at entry. Patient demographics and disease activity measures were collected at study entry, and baseline characteristics were summarized for various subgroups. Effectiveness, safety, and patterns of use will be tracked for therapies utilized during the 5-year study. RESULTS: RADIUS 1 enrolled 4959 patients, and RADIUS 2 enrolled 5102 patients, mostly at community private practices (88%). In RADIUS 1, most patients initiated methotrexate (MTX) monotherapy, followed by MTX in combination with a biologic (e.g. infliximab plus MTX) or other DMARD. In RADIUS 2, most patients initiated etanercept in combination with MTX, followed by etanercept monotherapy. When a new therapy was required, physicians tended to add another therapy versus switching therapies. Patients initiating a biologic had a longer duration of RA and more severe disease compared with patients initiating non-biologic therapy. CONCLUSIONS: These real-world data provide evidence of the prescribing practices of rheumatologists in 2001-2003. Future analyses will allow evidence-based comparisons of the long-term safety and effectiveness of DMARDs, biologics, and combination therapies to assist physicians in clinical decision-making.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

Multiple sclerosis disease-modifying therapies: adverse effect surveillance and management.

There are five approved, partially effective, parenteral disease-modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis (MS), including three interferon-beta preparations, glatiramer acetate and the antineoplastic agent mitoxantrone. A sixth drug, natalizumab, was withdrawn from the market in 2005 but could return with increased safety measures. Careful surveillance for, and management of, the minor and serious adverse effects associated with these therapies in routine practice provides the best opportunity for maintaining compliance and achieving maximal therapeutic efficacy. This review outlines the strategies for the prevention, identification and management of the complications associated with administration and ongoing use of current MS therapies. These skills will become increasingly important to those caring for MS patients as contemporary treatment regimens become increasingly complex.

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems↗
PubMed1996

Urinary glucaric acid excretion in rheumatoid arthritis: influence of disease activity and disease modifying drugs.

OBJECTIVE: To examine if a correlation exists between cytochrome P-450 enzyme induction and disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), measuring urinary excretion of D-glucaric acid (GA) as an index of phase II drug metabolism. METHODS: Patients with RA were treated with sulphasalazine, sodium aurothiomalate, or D-penicillamine in standard dose regimens, for 24 weeks. Patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) or non-inflammatory arthritis (NIA) acted as controls. The urinary GA:creatinine ratio was measured at 0, 12, and 24 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: Patients with RA had a slightly greater urinary GA:creatinine ratio than patients with AS or NIA at baseline; this increased during treatment with disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Sulphasalazine treatment had a greater effect on GA excretion than sodium aurothiomalate or D-penicillamine; this difference was statistically significant between weeks 0 and 12 (p = 0.01). Gamma glutamyltranspeptidase concentration showed a weak correlation with GA excretion between weeks 0 and 12 (p = 0.03), but all other measurements of changes in disease activity (plasma viscosity, C reactive protein, platelets, and articular index) were found not to correlate with GA excretion between weeks 0-12 or 0-24. CONCLUSION: The increased excretion of GA in patients with RA receiving DMARD treatment is probably the result of an indirect effect on hepatic metabolism bearing no relationship to disease activity.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Symptomatic and disease-modifying therapy for the progressive ataxias.

BACKGROUND: The progressive ataxias are a diverse group of neurologic diseases that share features of degeneration of the cerebellum and its inflow/outflow pathways but differ in etiology, course, and associated noncerebellar system involvement. Some will have treatable causes, but for most, the pathophysiology is incompletely known. REVIEW SUMMARY: Treatment strategies will include (1) definitive therapy when available, (2) symptomatic treatment and prevention of complications, and (3) rehabilitation and support resources. The physician will have to decide whether to introduce or approve the use of therapies based on as yet-unproven mechanisms or the use of complementary medicine approaches. CONCLUSIONS: There are as yet no drugs that have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of the progressive ataxias and relatively few disease-modifying therapies, but symptomatic and rehabilitation interventions can greatly improve the quality of life of individuals with these disabling neurodegenerative disorders.

Ataxia↗
PubMed2000

Medical resource use and costs among rheumatoid arthritis patients receiving disease-modifying antirheumatic drug therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To identify costs among rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients receiving alternative disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) therapies. METHODS: Using managed care organization data, we identified members who (a) were prescribed any DMARD therapy for two consecutive months between July 1993 and February 1998, (b) were aged > or = 18 years, (c) had > or = 6 months of DMARD-free enrollment prior to the first DMARD, and (d) had a diagnosis of RA. RESULTS: The average age of the cohort (n = 571) was 51 years, and 70% were women. Mean duration of enrollment following initiation of DMARD therapy (observation period) was 19.5 months; 28.8% of patients switched DMARD regimens. The average monthly cost of care was $853, of which $294 (34%) was for RA-coded medical services. Monthly RA-coded costs varied by DMARD: hydroxychloroquine $227 (n = 252), methotrexate $340 (n = 185); sulfasalazine $233 (n = 49), and other mono/combination therapy $425 (n = 85) (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Costs of RA-coded care in patients receiving DMARDs are low and vary by DMARD.

Antirheumatic Agents↗
PubMed1992

Regulation of B cell function by lobenzarit, a novel disease-modifying antirheumatic drug.

OBJECTIVE: Lobenzarit (disodium 4-chloro-2,2'-iminodibenzoate [CCA]) is a novel disease-modifying drug for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Although its clinical efficacy has been demonstrated, its mechanism of action remains unclear. We therefore examined the effects of CCA on in vitro IgM and IgM rheumatoid factor (IgM-RF) production by human B cells. METHODS: IgM and IgM-RF production was induced from highly purified B cells from 8 healthy donors by stimulation with Staphylococcus aureus Cowan 1 (SAC) plus factors generated from mitogen-activated T cells (TCF) or with immobilized anti-CD3-activated CD4+ T cells. RESULTS: CCA suppressed the production of IgM-RF as well as IgM at concentrations of 25-50 micrograms/ml (therapeutic serum concentrations of the drug), although the IgM-RF production induced by SAC plus TCF was suppressed at lower concentrations of CCA (1-3 micrograms/ml). Whereas CCA suppressed interleukin-2 (IL-2) production by anti-CD3-activated CD4+ T cells, its suppressive effects on B cells were not overcome by addition of IL-2 or TCF. CCA did not inhibit the initial stages of B cell activation in either culture system, but rather, suppressed the maturation of previously activated B cells. Cell cycle analysis by acridine orange staining indicated that CCA-mediated inhibition of B cell responsiveness induced by anti-CD3-activated CD4+ T cells was the result of a block at the G1-S interphase. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that CCA suppresses the production of IgM and IgM-RF by directly inhibiting activated B cells. Thus, one of the actions of CCA in RA may be the suppression of the function of activated B cells.

Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal↗
PubMed1976

Cyclophosphamide, gold and penicillamine--disease-modifying drugs in rheumatoid arthritis--tailored dosage and ultimate success.

Gold appears to be the disease-modifying drug of first choice for two reasons: response and absence of long-term toxicity. Although cyclophosphamide produces results as good or better than gold, the possible long-term toxicity outweighs the clinical benefit except in the unusual case. Penicillamine appears to be an acceptable drug of second choice.

Arthritis, Rheumatoid↗
PubMed2005

A meta-analysis of the efficacy and toxicity of combining disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs in rheumatoid arthritis based on patient withdrawal.

INTRODUCTION: Combinations of disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are increasingly used to treat rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Early trials showed their toxicity while recent trials suggest superior efficacy. Trials of DMARD combinations have enrolled different types of patient (early or established RA), used different designs (step-up, parallel or step-down) and utilized a range of outcome measures. We undertook a systematic review of combination DMARD therapy for RA and carried out a meta-analysis to evaluate the evidence for efficacy and toxicity. METHOD: Medline, PubMed and EmBase were searched using MESH headlines 'arthritis, rheumatoid', 'drug therapy, combination' and 'randomized controlled trial' (RCT) for papers published from 1975 to April 2004. References from published articles were also searched. Three independent assessors evaluated abstracts and selected trials for detailed examination. Trials were excluded if their quality was poor, were not published in English or studied DMARDs not licensed to treat RA. Two independent assessors extracted data. Efficacy was assessed by the numbers of patients withdrawn due to lack of efficacy. Toxicity was assessed by the numbers of patients withdrawn due to adverse events. Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated and meta-analysis was carried out based on a random effects model. Sensitivity analyses evaluated different treatment combinations, trial designs, study populations and outcome measures. RESULTS: Fifty-three potentially relevant RCTs were identified. Twelve were excluded due to: using unlicensed DMARDs (n = 3); reporting in journal supplements of RCTs already included (n = 2); follow-up of an earlier RCT, report of biological outcomes or pharmacokinetics (n = 5); and non-English language publications (n = 2). Forty-one RCTs were evaluated in detail and another five excluded (three open-labelled studies and two with high patient attrition); 36 studies were included in the meta-analysis. These comprised 13 step-up, 16 parallel and 7 step-down trials. Nine assessed early RA and 27 established RA. Seven added steroids to DMARD monotherapy and one study added steroids to DMARD combinations. Six assessed methotrexate (MTX) plus tumour necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors. Overall, combination DMARD therapy was more effective than monotherapy (RR 0.35; 95% CI 0.28, 0.45) although the risk of toxicity was also slightly higher (RR 1.37; 95% CI 1.16, 1.62). Combinations of MTX with TNF inhibitors and MTX with sulphasalazine or anti-malarials showed good efficacy/toxicity ratios. CONCLUSIONS: DMARD combinations vary in their efficacy/toxicity ratio. MTX plus sulphasalazine and/or anti-malarials and MTX plus TNF inhibitors have particularly favourable benefit/risk ratios.

Antirheumatic Agents↗
PubMed2003

Emerging disease modifying therapies for multiple sclerosis.

Multiple sclerosis (MS), the most common central nervous system (CNS) demyelinating disease, is thought to be mediated in part by CNS autoantigen-specific T cells. The aetiology of the disease is unclear, but includes genetic and environmental factors. The disease onset often occurs in young adults and is characterised by bouts of neurological symptoms such as numbness, weakness, imbalance or visual difficulties that may not be recovered from. Sometimes the course is more progressive. Since the disease can be disabling, several treatments have been developed that reduce the risk of relapse and progression of sustained disability. Although earlier treatment is encouraged, currently approved disease modifying therapies for MS are only partially effective, administered parenterally and associated with significant side effects and potential toxicities. Therefore, many promising new therapies are under development that target various goals, including immunosuppression, immunomodulation, cell traffic through the blood-brain barrier (BBB), neuroprotection and enhancement of CNS repair.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗
PubMed2002

Effectiveness profiles and dose dependent retention of traditional disease modifying antirheumatic drugs for rheumatoid arthritis. An observational study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the fate of traditional disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARD) in the longer term, with special respect to dose related effects on drug retention rates, efficacy, and toxicity. METHODS: Historical analysis of DMARD therapies in 593 patients, comprising a total of 1319 courses of DMARD over a period of 2378 patient-years of therapy. DMARD dosages, treatment durations, and reasons for discontinuation, and measures of C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate were analyzed. Drug retention rates were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: Methotrexate (MTX), chloroquine, and sulfasalazine (SSZ) emerged as the drugs most commonly applied during the past 15 years, whereas gold salts and D-penicillamine became less frequently used during the past decade. Therapies had to be terminated mostly for adverse events (42%) or inefficacy (37%). Patients taking high dose therapy had significantly longer median retention rates than those taking low doses (SSZ 34 vs 7 mo; MTX 73 vs 39 mo). Toxicity, ratherthan inefficacy, was the main reason for discontinuation of MTX and SSZ at low doses (p < 0.001). Median retention rates lasted < 24 mo for most DMARD, except for high dose MTX (> 36 mo). CONCLUSION: MTX, SSZ, and antimalarials have become the most commonly used traditional DMARD for rheumatoid arthritis. Their use is more often limited by toxicity than by inefficacy. If tolerated, they can be retained for long periods of time.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

The use of antimalarials in combination with other disease modifying agents in rheumatoid arthritis--the French experience.

A significant proportion of patients with rheumatoid arthritis have an aggressive, severe disease that may contribute to excess mortality. It has been suggested that early, aggressive therapy might improve the prognosis of these patients with active, severe rheumatoid arthritis. Combinations of disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs including antimalarials are increasingly used in patients with active disease. While several open trials showed encouraging results, some controlled studies gave less support for the use of combination therapy. Ongoing controlled trials of double or triple combination therapy, such as hydroxychloroquine, methotrexate and sulphasalazine, should help define its place in treating patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Antimalarials↗
PubMed2004

Alternatives to current disease-modifying treatment in MS: what do we need and what can we expect in the future?

Disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) for multiple sclerosis (MS) are now widely available, and their beneficial effects on relapse rates, magnetic resonance imaging outcomes and, in some cases, relapse-related disability have been shown in numerous clinical studies. However, as these treatments are only partially effective in halting the MS disease process, the search for improved treatment regimens and novel therapies must continue. Strategies to improve our therapeutic armamentarium have to take into account the different phases or parts of the pathogenesis of the disease. Available treatments address systemic immune dysfunction, blood-brain barrier permeability and the inflammatory process in the central nervous system. Currently, patients who fail to respond adequately to first-line DMTs are often considered as candidates for intensive immunosuppression with cytostatic agents or even autologous stem cell transplantation. However, new approaches are being developed. Combination therapies offer an alternative approach that may have considerable potential to improve therapeutic yield and, although likely to present considerable challenges in terms of trial design, this certainly seems to be a logical step forward in view of the complex pathology of MS. Several new drugs are also being developed with the aim of providing more effective, convenient and/or specific modulation of the inflammatory component of the disease. These treatments include humanised monoclonal antibodies such as the anti-VLA-4 antibody natalizumab, inhibitors of intracellular activation, signalling pathways and T-cell proliferation, and oral immunomodulators such as sirolimus, teriflunomide or statins. There remains, however, an urgent need for treatments that protect against demyelination and axonal loss, or promote remyelination/regeneration. Due to the chronicity of MS, the therapeutic window for neuroprotective agents is wider than that following stroke or acute spinal cord injury, and may therefore allow the use of some drugs that have proven disappointing in other situations. Novel potential neuroprotective agents such as alpha-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid antagonists and ion-channel blockers will be entering Phase II trials in MS in the near future, and it is hoped that these agents will mark the start of a new era for DMTs for MS.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗