Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Compomers”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 145 records · Page 8Linked to original sources
PubMed1999

[Comparison of different finishing methods for composites and compomers. Profilometric analysis].

BACKGROUND: Reconstructions with aesthetical materials neither finished nor polished can be extremely irregular and wrinkled. For this reason they represent an ideal basis for the growing of pigmentation which come from food remainings and the nestle of bacteria on the plaque. The finishing of aesthetical materials is a fundamental step in conservative dentistry. The finishing session regarding the aesthetical restorations should be considered and planned at the moment of their insertion in the prepared hollows. The finishing should not be considered an option, but the conclusion of all the conservative treatment. Purpose of the search is to examine and assess, through a technical equipment measuring the superficial wrinkledness of the materials, the action of 4 systems of finishing and polishing on two aesthetical materials widely used in the daily practice by dental surgeons: a compomer (Compoglass, Vivadent) and a composite (Spectrum, Dentsply). METHODS: For each of these two materials some little slabs model have been prepared, choosing the universal colour in the colorimetric scale. The two types of filling materials have been compared with 4 systems of finishing and polishing: Sof-Lex Pop-on (3M), Enhance system (Dentsply), Hawe Micro Disc (Howe Neos), Heawe Gommini Polisher (Heawe Neos). The total working time did not overcome 1 minute. The little slabs have been obtained, pressing the resin between two slides used in microscopy. In the hope to guarantee in the different samples, a uniform thickness, we have used a technical device. On each covering slide we have put a weight of 0.5 kg for 5 minutes. The thickness of the little slabs obtained was 2 mm. Thus, pressed between the two slides, the aesthetical material has been photopolymerized according to the time suggested by Manufacturing Industries. The sizes concerning the wrinkledness of samples subjected to different treatments have been carried out using a pointed profilometer with high sensitivity. (Tencor-P10). This instrument used in the National Laboratory of Catania, called INFN, is able to graphitize the wrinkledness of a surface "survbeying" it with a diamond ultramicrometric point. RESULTS: All tested systems gradually produce the upper layers of the materials less suitable to resist the assault of plaque bacteria as time passed. The 3M coarse and medium grain Disks are very abrasive and for this reason the surface of the materials is ill-shaped. Those disks with fine and extra fine grain, smooth the tracks left by previous disks. As they have been always used according to their decreasing granulometry, the disks are used only for removing small composite pieces in excess and to improve micromorphology of the restauration. The "Gommini" are less abrasive than Disks. In a few minutes and often with only one step they produce a much regular and polished fillings surface. CONCLUSIONS: The "Gommini" have a preference when the last photopolymerization has left a regular layer, with a very good micromorphology. Actually, "Gommini" do not remove much material, but they continue to smooth the outline of the reconstruction. Disks are not classified as being of first quality in the finishing of composites and compomers.

Composite Resins↗
PubMed1996

Clinical versatility of new compomer restorative technology.

The introduction of restorative materials known as compomers is revolutionizing the field of restorative dentistry. This versatile material combines the most positive attributes of both glass ionomers and composite resins, such as continuous fluoride release, excellent adhesion, ease in placement, exceptional shade blending, and high polishability. This article examines the advantages of the compomer (Compoglass, Ivoclar Vivadent, Amherst, NY) in relation to those of other restorative materials, details the indications for its use, and provides a procedural analysis of its application through a comprehensive description of a case report.

Composite Resins↗
PubMed2002

Dyes for caries detection: influence on composite and compomer microleakage.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of caries-detecting dyes on the microleakage of adhesive materials. Sixty cubic class V cavities were prepared on buccal and lingual surfaces of 30 human third molars. Coronal margins were located in enamel and gingival margins in cementum. The teeth were randomly divided into six groups of ten restorations each. Cavities were restored with an adhesive system (Single Bond, 3M ESPE, St. Paul, Minn., USA), a compomer (F2000, 3M ESPE), or a composite resin (Z100, 3M ESPE) according to the manufacturer's directions. Acid red dye (Seek, Ultradent, South Jordan, Ut., USA) and basic fuchsin dye (Vide Cárie, Inodon, Porto Alegre, Brazil) were tested. Control groups were prepared without the use of dyes. After 7 days of storage in distilled water, the restorations were polished and the teeth were subjected to thermal cycling followed by immersion in 2% methylene blue. The teeth were sectioned, and microleakage scores were evaluated under magnification (40x). Data were submitted to statistical analysis using the nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test. A statistically significant difference ( P<0.05) in microleakage was found between the materials in cementum (Z100>F2000) but not in enamel. Control and experimental groups using dyes showed similar results. It was concluded that dyes for caries detection did not increase microleakage of the adhesive materials tested.

Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate↗
PubMed1998

Development of gingivitis around aged restorations of resin-modified glass ionomer cement, polyacid-modified resin composite (compomer) and resin composite.

Resin-modified glass ionomer cements (RMGIC) and polyacid-modified resin composites (PMC, compomers) are two recently introduced material groups supposed to replace traditional cements in operative dentistry. The new restoratives release initially fluoride in different relatively high concentrations, which decrease gradually during the first weeks in vivo. Earlier studies showed a stronger subclinical inflammatory reaction around different conventional tooth colored restorative materials than around intact enamel. The aim of this study was to compare intra-individually the initiation of gingival inflammation around, aged RMGIC, PMC and resin composite restorations. Subgingivally located Class III restorations were placed in 17 patients. Each patient received one of each of the experimental materials. All patients were placed on an oral hygiene regime 1-year after finishing of the restorations. Gingivitis was induced during a one-week period without oral hygiene. The gingival condition was assessed by sampling of gingival crevicular fluid (GCF), registration of the amount of bacterial plaque and by registration of bleeding after gentle probing of the entrance of the gingival sulcus (SBI) on the experimental filling- and control-enamel surfaces at days 0 and 7. No differences were seen in plaque and gingival index scores between the materials at both days. The GCF increased significantly for all surfaces during the experimental gingivitis period. At day 7 significantly lower GCF was sampled around the enamel surfaces. In conclusion, the differences between the materials did not result in measurable differences concerning clinical or subclinical signs of gingivitis.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Pattern of cell death after in vitro exposure to GDMA, TEGDMA, HEMA and two compomer extracts.

OBJECTIVES: In vitro exposure to chemical compounds in dental materials may cause cell death by apoptosis, necrosis or a combination of both. The aim of this paper was to evaluate aqueous extracts of freshly cured compomers Freedom (SDI) and F2000 (3M ESPE), and constituents identified in the extracts, GDMA (glycerol dimethacrylate), TEGDMA (triethylene glycol dimethacrylate) and HEMA (2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) for their ability to induce necrosis and apoptosis in primary rat alveolar macrophages and the J744A1 macrophage cell line. METHODS: The cells were exposed to either extracts of freshly cured samples of the products or to one of the constituents identified in the extracts. Cytotoxicity and necrosis were assayed by MTT test and fluorescence microscopy, respectively. Apoptosis was assayed by fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry. RESULTS: Concentration-related apoptosis and necrosis were found in both cell types after exposure to extracts from Freedom and F2000. GDMA appeared to be the most cytotoxic of the tested constituents in the J744A1 cell line as evaluated by the MTT test. TEGDMA was more cytotoxic than HEMA using the MTT test and fluorescence microscopy, whereas HEMA caused a greater accumulation of apoptotic cells seen by fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry. For various concentrations of HEMA and TEGDMA, the extent of apoptosis appeared inversely related to the cytotoxicity evaluated by the MTT test. SIGNIFICANCE: As an apoptotic response elicits less inflammatory response in the surrounding tissues than a necrotic process, the role of cell death pattern could be important for the evaluation of the biocompatibility of dental materials.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

Polyacid-modified composite resins ("compomers") and their use in clinical dentistry.

OBJECTIVES: This paper describes the chemistry and properties of polyacid-modified composite resins ("compomers") designed for use in clinical dentistry, and reviews the literature in this area. METHODS: Information has been obtained from over 50 published articles appearing in the dental and biomaterials literature, with studies being principally identified through MedLine. RESULTS: Published work shows that polyacid-modified composite resins constitute a discrete class of polymeric repair material for use in dentistry. Their distinction is that they contain hydrophilic components, and these cause water to be drawn into the material following cure. This triggers an acid-base reaction, and gives the materials certain clinically-desirable properties (fluoride release, buffering capability) that are also associated with glass-ionomer cements. The water uptake leads to a decline in certain, though not all, physical properties. However, clinical studies have shown these materials to perform acceptably in a variety of applications (Class I, Class II and Class V cavities, as fissure sealants and as orthodontic band cements), especially in children's teeth. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Polyacid-modified composite resins constitute a versatile class of dental repair material, whose bioactivity confers clinical advantages, and which are particularly useful in children's dentistry.

Biocompatible Materials↗
PubMed1998

Retentive strengths of cast gold crowns using glass ionomer, compomer, or resin cement.

PURPOSE: The retention forces of a newly developed compomer cement (Dyract Cem), a glass ionomer cement (Ketac Cem Aplicap), and a resin cement (F21) were examined. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Cemented cast gold crowns were removed along the path of insertion with a Zwick universal testing device. The impact of both a cured and a noncured additional bonding layer that were applied to the inner surface of the crowns was examined across the Dyract Cem group. RESULTS: The mean adhesive strength was measured at 2.36 +/- 0.69 N/mm2 in the Ketac Cem group, at 0.60 +/- 0.28 N/mm2 in the F21 group, and at 1.85 +/- 0.94 N/mm2 in the Dyract Cem group, respectively. The application of an additional bonding layer to the inner surface of the crowns did not significantly improve the retentive strength of Dyract Cem; the respective mean strengths were observed at 1.46 +/-0.33 N/mm2 for the uncured and at 1.70 +/- 0.76 N/mm2 for the cured bonding layers. CONCLUSIONS: Dyract Cem and Ketac Cem showed significantly higher retentive strengths than F21 (p < 0.001, Wilcoxon test, 5% level). No significant difference was found in bond strength between Ketac Cem and Dyract Cem.

Adhesiveness↗
PubMed1999

Storage of polyacid-modified resin composites ("compomers") in lactic acid solution.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the interaction of four polyacid-modified resin composites with aqueous lactic acid solutions, and to compare changes with those for a glass-ionomer cement and a conventional resin composite. METHODS: For each material, namely Compoglass F, Dyract AP, Hytac and Ana Compomer, plus AquaCem (glass-ionomer cement) and Pekafil (conventional composite resin), five cylindrical specimens of 4 mm diameter x 6 mm height were prepared and weighed. They were stored individually in 2.0 cm3 of 0.02 mol l-1 lactic acid solution for 1 week then the pH was determined and the specimens reweighed. The lactic acid solution was replenished, and the specimens were stored for a further week, after which the pH and specimen weights were again measured. This was repeated at 1 week intervals until the specimens were 6 weeks old. Differences were analysed by ANOVA followed by Newman-Keuls post hoc analysis. RESULTS: All four polyacid-modified composites increased the pH of the solutions at all time intervals by at least 0.26 pH units (significant to at least p < 0.01). This effect was similar to that of the glass-ionomer (but significantly less, p < 0.05) while significantly greater (p < 0.05) than that for the composite, Pekafil, which, by contrast, had no effect on pH. The observed rise in pH reduced significantly over time (ANOVA, p < 0.05). After 1 week, all pH changes were accompanied by net reductions in specimen mass, indicating susceptibility to acid erosion. Hytac was significantly more resistant to this erosion than the other materials; conversely, it had the least effect on solution pH. SIGNIFICANCE: These results show that polyacid-modified resin composites neutralise lactic acid in vitro but suffer erosion in the process.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed2001

Expansion behaviour of compomer restoratives.

This study measured the dimensional changes due to hygroscopic expansion that occur in five commercially available compomer restorative materials using a computer-controlled laser micrometer. The materials tested were; [C] = Compoglass-F (Vivadent); [D] = Dyract AP (Dentsply DeTrey); [E] = Elan (Kerr); [F] = F2000 (3M); [H] = Hytac (Espe). Twelve discs of each test material were prepared, 10 mm diameter x 1 mm thickness. All specimens were kept dry for 48 h during polymerisation. Two control specimens of each group were kept in a desiccating chamber; five specimens in deionized water at 37 degrees C and five specimens in artificial saliva (Salivace, Penn) at 37 degrees C. The diameter of each disc was measured automatically across 200 points by rotation through the laser beam. These measurements, together with weight measurements, were carried out at intervals over a 2 month period. At 2 months, the mean % changes in volume after water immersion were: [C] = 2.45% (SD = 0.10); [D] = 1.50% (SD = 0.12); [E] = 1.53% (SD = 0.09); [F] = 1.69% (SD = 0.12); [H] = 1.44% (SD = 0.18). Specimens immersed in artificial saliva showed expansion rates identical to those immersed in water with the exception of material [H] at 1.73% (SD = 0.02) (p = 0.01). All specimens immersed in saliva showed a greater weight gain than those in water. The time taken to reach 90% of the final expansion varied from 7 days [F] to 50 days [H].

Compomers↗
PubMed2001

Fluoride release/uptake of conventional and resin-modified glass ionomers, and compomers.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the levels of fluoride ions released from a range of freshly-prepared aesthetic restorative materials, and then the effects of a topical acidulated phosphate fluoride (APF) gel. METHODS: Five specimens each of four conventional GICs, two resin-modified GICs, two compomers, and a resin composite (control) were assessed for their fluoride ion release over 6 weeks, before being exposed to 1.23% APF gel for 4 min and then measuring their fluoride ion levels for another 6 weeks. RESULTS: Following an initial brief, variable burst of fluoride ion release, the rates then fell quickly for most materials and, although high rates of fluoride ion release were measured immediately following the application of APF gel, these rates also fell quickly for most materials. After 12 weeks, the mean fluoride ion levels were much lower than immediately before gel application. The APF gel treatment caused surface damage to all materials, especially to the conventional GICs. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggested that much of the increased fluoride ion release found following topical exposure of the fluoridated restorative materials to APF gel was caused by surface effects rather than by chemical recharging.

Acidulated Phosphate Fluoride↗
PubMed2002

Hygroscopic expansion of a compomer and a composite on artificial gap reduction.

OBJECTIVE: This study compared the effect of water sorption on the extent of marginal gap reduction in a compomer (Dyract AP, Dentsply) and a composite (Spectrum, Dentsply) over a 12-week storage period. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Artificial gaps were created in 40 borosilicate glass cylinders, each 5mm deep and with an internal diameter of 5.5mm. Half of the internal bonding surface of each cylinder was sandblasted, silanised and coated with a dentine adhesive (Prime&Bond NT, Dentsply). Twenty partially bonded cylinders were incrementally filled with Dyract AP (AP) and the rest with Spectrum (S). For each material, 10 specimens were stored in de-ionised water (W), and 10 (control) in non-aqueous silicone fluid (O) at 37 degrees C. The dimension of the same maximum gap created in each specimen was repeatedly measured at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 weeks, using a light microscope under incident light at 570x magnification. Gap widths in each of the four groups (n=10) were statistically compared. Correlations between mean gap width reduction and storage time were also examined. RESULTS: Friedman repeated measures ANOVA on ranks revealed significant differences (p<0.001) among the gap widths measured at different time intervals in groups AP-W and S-W. No significant differences (p>0.05) were found in groups AP-O and S-O. Tukey's multiple comparison test indicated that no significant differences (p>0.05) were detectable beyond the sixth week in AP-W and the fourth week in S-W. Linear regression analyses showed that mean gap widths decreased exponentially with time for AP-W (r=0.97) and S-W (r=0.90). From the slopes of the regression lines, the rate of marginal gap reduction in AP-W was 4.6 times faster than S-W. CONCLUSION: Marginal gap reduction in both the materials are directly attributed to water sorption and that the reduction is larger and more rapid in Dyract AP.

Absorption↗
PubMed1998

In vitro caries inhibition by polyacid-modified composite resins ('compomers').

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the in-vitro caries inhibition of two polyacid-modified composite resins (PMCRs). METHODS: Three standardized class V cavities were prepared in eight extracted human molar teeth. Two of these cavities in each tooth were restored with Compoglass and Dyract according to manufacturers' guidelines. A conventional glass-ionomer cement restoration (Chemfil II) was placed in the third cavity in each tooth as a control. The teeth were submerged in an acid gel (lactic acid, gelatin, thymol, pH 4.5) for 28 days and then resin embedded. Ground sections were examined at x 160 magnification for enamel surface lesion depth, dentine surface lesion depth, wall lesions and evidence of caries inhibition. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the depths of enamel or dentine surface lesions between the two compomer and conventional glass-ionomer materials. However, both PMCRs exhibited greater wall lesions than the conventional glass-ionomer material indicating less caries inhibition. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that PMCRs provide less caries inhibition than glass-ionomer cements.

Anti-Infective Agents, Local↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Fluoride release and cariostatic ability of a compomer and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement used for orthodontic bonding.

OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to compare the local and systemic uptake of fluoride released from a compomer material (Dyract Ortho) and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement (Vitremer) with that of a conventional resin adhesive (Right-On) and to compare the cariostatic ability of each of the test materials with that of the resin control. METHODS: Twenty six patients were randomly allocated to have a bracket bonded to a premolar on one side of the arch with one of the test materials and on the opposite side with the control material. Premolars destined for extraction as part of an orthodontic treatment plan were selected for bonding. A non-fluoride toothpaste was used by all participants for 4 weeks prior to bracket bonding and throughout the 4 week trial period. Fluoride release was measured in saliva, plaque and urine samples taken pre-bonding and 4 weeks post-bonding. Enamel demineralisation was assessed by scoring the buccal surface of each extracted tooth using a caries index. RESULTS: Neither Vitremer nor Dyract Ortho altered salivary or urinary fluoride concentration significantly 4 weeks post-bonding but plaque fluoride concentration increased significantly around premolars bonded with Vitremer. The test materials as a combined group were associated with significantly less demineralisation than the control material but there was no significant difference in cariostatic ability detected between either Dyract Ortho or Vitremer when each group was compared separately with the control. CONCLUSIONS: Fluoride released from Dyract Ortho or Vitremer is likely to exert a local and not a systemic effect. In a 4-week clinical study, the cariostatic ability of the fluoride-releasing cements, as a combined group, was superior to that of the non-fluoride releasing control but there was no significant difference in cariostatic ability between the two test materials when each test group was compared separately with the control.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

Clinical performance of a compomer and amalgam for the interproximal restoration of primary molars: a 24-month evaluation.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the clinical performance of a compomer material (Dyract) in comparison with dental amalgam (Contour) for management of proximal caries in primary molars in young children. SETTING: General dental practice, and a dental hospital paediatric clinic. METHOD: This was a prospective study. A split mouth design was used with identical pairs of minimal Class II cavities, of matched tooth type in the same dental arch, usually diagnosed with the use of bitewing radiographs. Seventy-eight pairs of restorations were completed of which 60 pairs were available for evaluation after 24 months. RESULTS: Comparable retention rates were observed for both Dyract and amalgam. The retention rates were high for both materials, with only four amalgam and two Dyract restorations failing over 24 months. Significantly better marginal integrity (P < 0.05) was observed for Dyract compared with amalgam with no significant differences between the two materials for recurrent caries, wear or surface texture. CONCLUSIONS: Dyract seemed to be a suitable alternative to amalgam for proximal restorations in primary molars of young children for use in general dental practice.

Child↗
PubMed2002

In vitro cytotoxicity of a composite resin and compomer.

AIM: This work was designed to investigate the potential cytotoxicity of two of the newer dental restorative materials. Spectrum composite resin and Dyract AP compomer. METHODOLOGY: Cultured human endothelial cells (ECV-304) were exposed to each of the restorative materials through a 70-microm dentine barrier to simulate the in vivo clinical situation. Cell viability was measured by the MTT (3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5 diphenyltetrazolium bromide) assay and lactate dehydrogenase release assay. The effects of different extents of light-curing were also examined by microscopic examination of stained human promyelocytic leukemia cells (HL-60). Caspase-3 activation was determined as a measure of apoptotic cell death. RESULTS: Assessment of cellular viability indicated that both materials cause cell death, with Spectrum being the more toxic. The cytotoxicity was considerably increased in the absence of the dentine barrier. Direct exposure to Spectrum for 12 h resulted in the death of 69% of the cells after full light-curing (78% of total death was by apoptosis) and 96% after partial light-curing (73% of total death was by necrosis). Assessment of caspase activation, in the absence of the dentine barrier, showed that longer curing-times resulted in an increase in the proportion of the cells dying through apoptosis, rather than necrosis, for both materials tested. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate the restorative materials to be potentially toxic, particularly if the degree of light-cure is inadequate.

Apoptosis↗
PubMed2001

The influence of three Erbium:YAG laser energies on the in vitro microleakage of Class V compomer resin restorations.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the influence of three Erbium:YAG pulse energies (200 mJ, 240 mJ, and 300 mJ with a 100 mJ dentine finish) on the microleakage of Class V compomer restorations (Compoglass). DESIGN: In vitro study. SAMPLE AND METHODS: Sixty-one extracted human premolar teeth were randomly allocated to three groups (according to pulse energy). Each tooth hosted one test cavity prepared with one of the three Er:YAG pulse energies using a pulse repetition rate of 5 Hz and a pulse duration of 250 microseconds, and one control cavity prepared with a conventional diamond bur in a high-speed hand piece. Both cavities were placed at the cervical margin of the tooth and were restored and finished according to the manufacturer's instructions. Each tooth was then stored in 0.12% thymol solution at 37 degrees C for three months, before being thermocycled through water baths between 5 degrees C and 55 degrees C for 240 cycles. Microleakage was assessed using a methylene blue dye penetration technique and was quantified using a score 0 (none) to 4 (to and into the axial wall). The data was analysed using the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U-tests. RESULTS: Leakage was seen in all groups at both the dentine and enamel margins. There were no statistically significant differences in leakage (P < 0.05) at either the enamel or dentine margins, except for the 240 mJ lased enamel margins. This group performed significantly better than the enamel margins prepared with 200 mJ (P = 0.03) and the 300/100 mJ (P = 0.01) laser energies as well as the conventionally prepared enamel margins (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Cavity preparation with this Erbium:YAG laser did not influence the microleakage of Compoglass restorations adversely. Different pulse energies were required for optimum cavity sealing at the enamel and dentine margins and for different materials.

Bicuspid↗
PubMed2002

Clinical and SEM evaluations of three compomer systems in Class V carious lesions.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical performance of three compomer systems: Compoglass F, Dyract AP and F2000 in Class V carious lesions. In addition, some restorations were placed in teeth scheduled for extractions in order to evaluate the compomer/dentin interface with the scanning electron microscope (SEM). A total of 175 Class V carious lesions having the gingival margins extending into cementum were restored with the tested materials. Each restoration was clinically evaluated immediately after placement, after 1 year and after 2 years using the USPHS criteria. After 1 year no loss of restoration was recorded. No significant difference between the materials was observed for any evaluation category. After 2 years, one Compoglass and two Dyract restorations were lost. No loss of F2000 was reported. No significant difference was reported between the tested materials and between the 2-year data and baseline ones. A well-defined hybrid layer as well as resin tags was seen at the interface between the tested materials and vital dentin.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

An investigation into the use of two polyacid-modified composite resins (compomers) and a resin-modified glass poly(alkenoate) cement used to retain orthodontic bands.

The aim of this investigation was to determine the effectiveness of a conventional glass poly(alkenoate) cement (Intact) and newer polyacid-modified composite resin cements (Transbond Plus and Ultra Band-Lok) to retain orthodontic bands. In the in vitro part of this study, stainless steel bands were cemented to 240 extracted third molar teeth in three test groups comprising Intact, Transbond Plus and Ultra Band-Lok. The force to deband (N) for all three cements was recorded using an Instron universal testing machine after the following observation periods: 20 minutes and 3, 6 and 12 months. The results indicated that all three cements increased their median force to deband after 12 months. Of the two compomers, Transbondtrade mark Plus demonstrated the highest median force to deband at all four time intervals. In the in vivo part of the study, 30 patients participated in a randomized cross-mouth clinical trial where the molar bands were cemented in place using either Intact or Transbond Plus. Ultra Band-Lok was not used in the clinical part of the study. The results showed there to be no clinically significant difference in band failure rates between the two cements. When patients were asked to score each for taste, there was a significant difference, with the glass poly(alkenoate) cement (Intact) being more acceptable than the polyacid-modified composite Transbond Plus (P < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in the in vitro median force to deband or in vivo band failure rates between the glass poly(alkenoate) cement and the polyacid-modified composite resins. The choice of cementing agent can therefore be made on patient factors, e.g. taste, or operator factors, e.g. ease of handling, cost and shelf life.

Cementation↗