Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Cell fate”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 145 records · Page 8Linked to original sources

Hematopoietic cell fate and the initiation of leukemic properties in primitive primary human cells are influenced by Ras activity and farnesyltransferase inhibition.

The Ras pathway transduces divergent signals determining normal cell fate and is frequently activated in hematopoietic malignancies, but the manner in which activation contributes to human leukemia is poorly understood. We report that a high level of activated H-Ras signaling in transduced primary human hematopoietic progenitors reduced their proliferation and enhanced monocyte/macrophage differentiation. However, the exposure of these cells to a farnesyltransferase inhibitor and establishment of a moderate level of Ras activity showed increased proliferation, an elevated frequency of primitive blast-like cells, and progenitors with enhanced self-renewal capacity. These results suggest that the amplitude of Ras pathway signaling is a determinant of myeloid cell fate and that moderate Ras activation in primitive hematopoietic cells can be an early event in leukemogenesis.

Alkyl and Aryl Transferases↗

The hyh mutation uncovers roles for alpha Snap in apical protein localization and control of neural cell fate.

The hyh (hydrocephalus with hop gait) mouse shows a markedly small cerebral cortex at birth and dies postnatally from progressive enlargement of the ventricular system. Here we show that the small hyh cortex reflects altered cell fate. Neural progenitor cells withdraw prematurely from the cell cycle, producing more early-born, deep-layer cerebral cortical neurons but depleting the cortical progenitor pool, such that late-born, upper-layer cortical neurons are underproduced, creating a small cortex. hyh mice carry a hypomorphic missense mutation in the gene Napa encoding soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor (NSF) attachment protein alpha (alpha Snap), involved in SNAP receptor (SNARE)-mediated vesicle fusion in many cellular contexts. A targeted null Napa mutation is embryonically lethal. Altered neural cell fate is accompanied by abnormal localization of many apical proteins implicated in regulation of neural cell fate, including E-cadherin, beta-catenin, atypical protein kinase C (aPKC) and INADL (inactivation-no-afterpotential D-like, also known as protein associated with Lin7, or Pals1). Apical localization of the SNARE Vamp7 is also disrupted. Thus, alpha Snap is essential for apical protein localization and cell fate determination in neuroepithelial cells.

Animals↗

Cell cycle and cell fate interactions in neural development.

Mechanisms coupling cell cycle and cell fate operate at different steps during neural development. Intrinsic factors control the cell proliferation of distinct brain regions and changes of cell fate competence, whereas components of the cell cycle machinery could play a major role in setting the appropriate timing of the generation of different cell types.

Animals↗

The mechanics of cell fate determination in petals.

The epidermal cells of petals of many species are specialized, having a pronounced conical shape. A transcription factor, MIXTA, is required for the formation of conical cells in Antirrhinum majus; in shoot epidermal cells of several species, expression of this gene is necessary and sufficient to promote conical cell formation. Ectopic expression has also shown MIXTA to be able to promote the formation of multicellular trichomes, indicating that conical cells and multicellular trichomes share elements of a common developmental pathway. Formation of conical cells or trichomes is also mutually exclusive with stomatal formation. In Antirrhinum, MIXTA normally only promotes conical cell formation on the inner epidermal layer of the petals. Its restricted action in cell fate determination results from its specific expression pattern. Expression of MIXTA, in turn, requires the activity of B-function genes, and biochemical evidence suggests that the products of DEFICIENS, GLOBOSA and SEPALLATA-related genes directly activate MIXTA expression late in petal development, after the completion of cell division in the petal epidermis. A MIXTA-like gene, AmMYBML1, is also expressed in petals. AmMYBML1 expression is high early in petal development. This gene may direct the formation of trichomes in petals. In specifying the fates of different cell types in petals, regulatory genes like MIXTA may have been duplicated. Changes in the timing and spatial localization of expression then provides similar regulatory genes which specify different cell fates.

Antirrhinum↗

A role for the fibroblast growth factor receptor in cell fate decisions in the developing vertebrate retina.

The mature vertebrate retina contains seven major cell types that develop from an apparently homogenous population of precursor cells. Clonal analyses have suggested that environmental influences play a major role in specifying retinal cell identity. Fibroblast growth factor-2 is present in the developing retina and regulates the survival, proliferation and differentiation of developing retinal cells in culture. Here we have tested whether fibroblast growth factor receptor signaling biases retinal cell fate decisions in vivo. Fibroblast growth factor receptors were inhibited in retinal precursors in Xenopus embryos by expressing a dominant negative form of the receptor, XFD. Dorsal animal blastomeres that give rise to the retina were injected with cDNA expression constructs for XFD and a control non-functional mutant receptor, D48, and the cell fates of transgene-expressing cells in the mature retina determined. Fibroblast growth factor receptor blockade results in almost a 50% loss of photoreceptors and amacrine cells, and a concurrent 3.5-fold increase in Müller glia, suggesting a shift towards a Müller cell fate in the absence of a fibroblast growth factor receptor signal. Inhibition of non-fibroblast-growth-factor-mediated receptor signaling with a third mutant receptor, HAVO, alters cell fate in an opposite manner. These results suggest that it is the balance of fibroblast growth factor and non-fibroblast growth factor ligand signals that influences retinal cell genesis.

Animals↗

Cell lineage analysis of the amphipod crustacean Parhyale hawaiensis reveals an early restriction of cell fates.

In the amphipod crustacean, Parhyale hawaiensis, the first few embryonic cleavages are total and generate a stereotypical arrangement of cells. In particular, at the eight-cell stage there are four macromeres and four micromeres, and each of these cells is uniquely identifiable. We describe our studies of the cell fate pattern of these eight blastomeres, and find that the eight clones resulting from these cells set up distinct cell lineages that differ in terms of proliferation, migration and cell fate. Remarkably, the cell fate of each blastomere is restricted to a single germ layer. The ectoderm originates from three of the macromeres, while the remaining macromere generates the visceral mesoderm. Two of the micromeres generate the somatic mesoderm, a third micromere generates the endoderm and the fourth micromere generates the germline. These findings demonstrate for the first time a total cleavage pattern in an arthropod which results in an invariant cell fate of the blastomeres, but notably, the cell lineage pattern of Parhyale reported shows no clear resemblance to those found in spiralians, nematodes or deuterostomes. Finally, the techniques we have developed for the analysis of Parhyale development suggest that this arthropod may be particularly useful for future functional analyses of crustacean development.

Animals↗

Notch regulates cell fate in the developing pronephros.

The mechanisms that regulate cell fate within the pronephros are poorly understood but are important for the subsequent development of the urogenital system and show many similarities to nephrogenesis in the definitive kidney. Dynamic expression of Notch-1, Serrate-1, and Delta-1 in the developing Xenopus pronephros suggests a role for this pathway in cell fate segregation. Misactivation of Notch signaling using conditionally active forms of either Notch-1 or RBP-J/Su(H) proteins prevented normal duct formation and the proper expression of genetic markers of duct cell differentiation. Inhibition of endogenous Notch signaling elicited the opposite effect. Taken together with the mRNA expression patterns, these data suggest that endogenous Notch signaling functions to inhibit duct differentiation in the dorsoanterior region of the anlage where cells are normally fated to form tubules. In addition, elevated Notch signaling in the pronephric anlage both perturbed the characteristic pattern of the differentiated tubule network and increased the expression of early markers of pronephric precursor cells, Pax-2 and Wilms' tumor suppressor gene (Wt-1). We propose that Notch signaling plays a previously unrecognized role in the early selection of duct and tubule cell fates as well as functioning subsequently to control tubule cell patterning and development.

Animals↗

Eyes absent, a key repressor of polar cell fate during Drosophila oogenesis.

Throughout Drosophila oogenesis, specialized somatic follicle cells perform crucial functions in egg chamber formation and in signaling between somatic and germline cells. In the ovary, at least three types of somatic follicle cells, polar cells, stalk cells and main body epithelial follicle cells, can be distinguished when egg chambers bud from the germarium. Although specification of these three somatic cell types is important for normal oogenesis and subsequent embryogenesis, the molecular basis for establishment of their cell fates is not completely understood. Our studies reveal the gene eyes absent (eya) to be a key repressor of polar cell fate. EYA is a nuclear protein that is normally excluded from polar and stalk cells, and the absence of EYA is sufficient to cause epithelial follicle cells to develop as polar cells. Furthermore, ectopic expression of EYA is capable of suppressing normal polar cell fate and compromising the normal functions of polar cells, such as promotion of border cell migration. Finally, we show that ectopic Hedgehog signaling, which is known to cause ectopic polar cell formation, does so by repressing eya expression in epithelial follicle cells.

Animals↗

Cell fate specification and differentiation in the nervous system of Caenorhabditis elegans.

Neuronal cell fates are specified by a hierarchy of events mediated by cell-intrinsic determinants and cell-cell interactions. The determination of cell fate can be subdivided into three general steps. First, cell fate is restricted by the cell's position in the animal. For example, neurons are specified along the anterior-posterior body axis through the action of the Hox genes lin-39, mab-5, and egl-5. Second, a decision is made to generate a particular cell type, such as the progenitor of a neurogenic lineage as opposed to that of an epidermal lineage. Among the genes that influence this decision is the proneural gene lin-32. Third, characteristics of a particular cell type are specified. For example, in a neurogenic lineage, a decision may be made to generate a specific neuron type such as a sensory or motor neuron. Genes that affect neuronal fate can act in different ways to influence the development of different types of neurons.

Animals↗

T cell fate specification and alphabeta/gammadelta lineage commitment.

The development of T cells from pluripotent stem cells involves a coordinated series of lineage-commitment steps. Common lymphoid precursors in the fetal liver or adult bone marrow must first choose between a T, B or NK cell fate. Committed T cell precursors in the thymus then differentiate into cells committed to the alphabeta or gammadelta lineages. Recent advances have been made in our understanding of the mechanisms underlying T cell fate specification and alphabeta/gammadelta lineage divergence.

Animals↗

Control of cell fate in C. elegans by a GLP-1 peptide consisting primarily of ankyrin repeats.

The homologous proteins GLP-1 and LIN-12 are required for cell interactions during nematode development. glp-1 and lin-12 are members of a gene family that includes Drosophila Notch and several vertebrate homologues. The members of this family have a single transmembrane domain and a similar arrangement of repeated amino-acid motifs (see Fig. 1). The mechanism by which proteins in this family function is not understood. One hypothesis is that these proteins are receptors, each with an extracellular domain that binds a ligand and an intracellular domain that influences the activity of downstream cell fate regulators. Here we report that a region of the GLP-1 intracellular domain, consisting primarily of six ankyrin repeats, is sufficient to direct cell fate. The cell fate transformations seen are similar to transformations caused by gain-of-function mutations in either glp-1 or lin-12 and do not rely on endogenous lin-12 or glp-1 activity. We propose that the ankyrin repeat region of GLP-1 is responsible for controlling downstream regulators of cell fate.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Multiple HOM-C gene interactions specify cell fates in the nematode central nervous system.

Intricate patterns of overlapping HOM-C gene expression along the A/P axis have been observed in many organisms; however, the significance of these patterns in establishing the ultimate fates of individual cells is not well understood. We have examined the expression of the Caenorhabditis elegans Antennapedia homolog mab-5 and its role in specifying cell fates in the posterior of the ventral nerve cord. We find that the pattern of fates specified by mab-5 not only depends on mab-5 expression but also on post-translational interactions with the neighboring HOM-C gene lin-39 and a second, inferred gene activity. Where mab-5 expression overlaps with lin-39 activity, they can interact in two different ways depending on the cell type: They can either effectively neutralize one another where they are both expressed or lin-39 can predominate over mab-5. As observed for Antennapedia in Drosophila, expression of mab-5 itself is repressed by the next most posterior HOM-C gene, egl-5. Thus, a surprising diversity in HOM-C regulatory mechanisms exists within a small set of cells even in a simple organism.

Animals↗

The Drosophila gene Hairless encodes a novel basic protein that controls alternative cell fates in adult sensory organ development.

The mechanosensory bristles of adult Drosophila are composed of four cells that, in most cases, are progeny of a single sensory organ precursor (SOP) cell. Two sister cells in this lineage, the trichogen and tormogen, produce the external shaft and socket of the bristle, respectively. Loss-of-function mutations of Hairless (H) confer two distinct mutant phenotypes on adult bristles. The bristle loss phenotype results from the failure to specify and/or execute the SOP cell fate; the double socket phenotype results from the transformation of the trichogen (shaft) cell into a second tormogen (socket) cell. We have found that the H gene encodes a novel basic protein with a predicted molecular mass of 109 kD. Basal levels of expression of a transgene (P[Hs-H]) in which the H protein-coding region is under the control of the Hsp70 promoter are sufficient to provide full rescue of H mutant phenotypes. Heat shock treatment of P[Hs-H] transgenic animals as late larvae and early pupae produces a tormogen-to-trichogen (double shaft) cell fate transformation, as well as bristle multiplication and loss phenotypes very similar to those caused by loss-of-function mutations in the neurogenic gene Notch. Our results indicate that the SOP cell fate requires H to antagonize the activity of the neurogenic group of genes and that the expression of distinct cell fates by the trichogen/tormogen sister cell pair depends on an asymmetry in their levels of H+ activity or in their thresholds for response to H.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Plasticity of cell fate: insights from heterokaryons.

Experiments with somatic cell hybrids and stable heterokaryons have demonstrated that differentiated cells exhibit a remarkable capacity to change. Heterokaryons have been particularly useful in determining the extent to which the differentiated state of a cell is plastic. Cell fate can be altered by a change in the balance of positive and negative trans-acting regulators. Although a single regulator may be sufficient in certain environments to trigger a change in cell fate, that regulator may be ineffective in other cell contexts where it encounters a different composition of regulators.

Animals↗

Transcription regulation of cell fate plasticity - from embryonic development to tissue regeneration.

Cell fate plasticity refers to the capacity of cells sharing the same genome to alter, reverse, or reconfigure their identity under physiological, pathological, or experimental conditions. This property underlies embryonic development, cellular reprogramming, and tissue regeneration, but becomes progressively restricted as lineage identity is stabilized. Embryonic development represents an intrinsic process of fate transitions, whereas reprogramming and regeneration reveal how differentiated cells can dedifferentiate or transdifferentiate under specific conditions. Across these contexts, plasticity is governed by multilayered regulatory networks involving transcription factors, epigenetic regulators, cofactors, and the core transcription machinery. Robust regulatory programs stabilize cell identity, whereas stochastic fluctuations in gene expression and chromatin state can prime cells for fate transitions, adding a tunable dimension to plasticity control. In this review, we synthesize recent advances in the regulation of cell fate plasticity across development, reprogramming, and regeneration, highlighting how transcription factors, epigenetic modifications, transcriptional cofactors, and core transcription machinery cooperate to control cell fate decisions and plasticity.

Animals↗

Cell fate choices in Drosophila tracheal morphogenesis.

The Drosophila tracheal system is a branched tubular structure that supplies air to target tissues. The elaborate tracheal morphology is shaped by two linked inductive processes, one involving the choice of cell fates, and the other a guided cell migration. We will describe the molecular basis for these processes, and the allocation of cell fate decisions to four temporal hierarchies. First, tracheal placodes are specified within the embryonic ectoderm. Subsequently, branch fates are allocated within the tracheal placodes, prior to migration. Localized presentation of the FGF ligand, Branchless, to tracheal cells that express the FGF receptor, Breathless, guides migration. Once cell migration is initiated, distinct cell fates are determined within each migrating branch. Finally, inhibitory feedback mechanisms ensure the correct assignment of these fates. Tracheal cell fate choices are determined by signaling cascades triggered by signals emanating from the tracheal cells, as well as by ligands produced by adjacent tissues.

Animals↗

Mastermind acts downstream of notch to specify neuronal cell fates in the Drosophila central nervous system.

In the Drosophila central nervous system, cellular diversity is generated through the asymmetric partitioning of cell fate determinants at cell division. Neural precursors (or neuroblasts) divide in a stem cell lineage to generate a series of ganglion mother cells, each of which divides once to produce a pair of postmitotic neurons or glial cells. An exception to this rule is the MP2 neuroblast, which divides only once to generate two neurons. We screened for genes expressed in the MP2 neuroblast and its progeny as a means of identifying the factors that specify cell fate in the MP2 lineage. We identified a P-element insertion line that expresses the reporter gene, tau-beta-galactosidase, in the MP2 precursor and its progeny, the vMP2 and dMP2 neurons. The transposon disrupts the neurogenic gene, mastermind, but does not lead to neural hyperplasia. However, the vMP2 neuron is transformed into its sibling cell, dMP2. By contrast, expression of a dominant activated form of the Notch receptor in the MP2 lineage transforms dMP2 to vMP2. Notch signalling requires Mastermind, suggesting that Mastermind acts downstream of Notch to determine the vMP2 cell fate. We show that Mastermind plays a similar role in the neurons derived from ganglion mother cells 1-1a and 4-2a, where it specifies the pCC and RP2sib fates, respectively. This suggests that Notch signalling through Mastermind plays a wider role in specifying neuronal identity in the Drosophila central nervous system.

Animals↗

Regulation of T cell fate by Notch.

The transmembrane receptor Notch participates in diverse cell fate decisions throughout embryonic development. Notch receptors and their ligands are expressed in the mammalian thymus, raising the possibility that Notch could regulate T cell fate decisions. Expression of a constitutively activated form of Notch in developing thymocytes causes thymocytes normally destined for the CD4 lineage to adopt the CD8 lineage instead. This suggests that Notch activity normally acts to direct CD4+CD8+ precursors to the CD8 lineage. The choice between CD4 and CD8 T cell fates is also controlled by MHC recognition during positive selection, implying that recognition of class I or II MHC might regulate Notch signaling. Possible models for the regulation of Notch by MHC recognition during CD4 versus CD8 lineage determination are discussed.

Animals↗