Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Cefprozil”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 145 records · Page 8Linked to original sources
PubMed2000

Palatability of oral antibiotics among children in an urban primary care center.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the palatability of antimicrobial agents effective against beta-lactamase-producing bacteria in American children. DESIGN: In a taste test of 4 antimicrobial agents, azithromycin (cherry flavored), cefprozil (bubble gum flavored), cefixime (strawberry flavored), and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (banana flavored) were compared. SETTING: An urban inner-city primary care clinic. SUBJECTS: A volunteer sample of 30 healthy children (aged 5-8 years). INTERVENTION: Palatability was determined using a single-blind taste test of 4 flavored antimicrobial agents. The 4 antimicrobial agents used were azithromycin, cefprozil, cefixime, and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: After each antimicrobial test dose, subjects rated the taste on a 10-cm visual analog scale incorporating a facial hedonic scale. Preference assessments for the best-tasting and worst-tasting agent were also conducted. RESULTS: Of the 20 children who expressed a preference, significantly more children (9 [45%], P<.05) selected the cefixime preparation as the best-tasting formulation compared with the other preparations. The cefixime preparation was also significantly the least likely to be selected as the worst-tasting preparation (2 [10%], P<.05). There were no significant differences between the other 3 preparations with respect to being selected as either the best or worst tasting. The mean (+/- SD) visual analog scale score for cefixime was highest (8.53 [2.49]) compared with the scores for azithromycin (6.78 [3.45]), cefprozil (6.26 [4.04]), and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (6.24 [4.01]). CONCLUSION: The cefixime preparation was most commonly rated as best tasting by children.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2006

The Bla2 beta-lactamase from the live-vaccine strain of Francisella tularensis encodes a functional protein that is only active against penicillin-class beta-lactam antibiotics.

Francisella tularensis ssp. tularensis is a category A select agent and the causal organism for the zoonotic disease tularemia. The vast majority of F. tularensis isolates are beta-lactamase-positive. beta-lactamase production is widely believed to be responsible for the inefficacy of beta-lactams in the treatment of tularemia. In this study, we report the cloning and characterization of the two chromosomally encoded F. tularensis ssp. holarctica live-vaccine strain (LVS) beta-lactamases. The two LVS beta-lactamases were homologous to F. tularensis Schu S4 open reading frames FTT0681c and FTT0611c and have been named bla1 (LVS) and bla2 (LVS), respectively. Recombinant expression in Escherichia coli suggested that bla1 (LVS) did not encode a functional beta-lactamase, whereas bla2 (LVS) encoded a functional beta-lactamase that hydrolyzed penicillins but was inactive against third-generation cephalosporins, including cefprozil. As both LVS and Schu S4 were susceptible to cefprozil, we developed three new shuttle vectors based on selection for the production of the Bla(shv-2) extended-spectrum beta-lactamase with cefprozil. The resulting shuttle vectors were suitable for recombinant gene expression and complementation studies in LVS and Schu S4.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed1998

Bacterial interference in the nasopharynx following antimicrobial therapy of acute otitis media.

The effect on the nasopharyngeal bacterial flora of therapy for 10 days with co-amoxiclav or cefprozil was studied in 50 children with acute otitis media. Before therapy, potential pathogens (Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae and Moraxella catarrhalis) were isolated in 14 (56%) of those treated with co-amoxiclav and 15 (60%) of those treated with cefprozil. Following therapy, the reduction in the number of these pathogens was the same in the two groups. However, differences between the groups were noted in the recovery of organisms with interfering capability, namely alpha-haemolytic streptococci, Peptostreptococcus anaerobius and Prevotella melaninogenica. Fifty interfering organisms were recovered from each group before therapy. After therapy with co-amoxiclav or cefprozil their number declined to 11 and 42, respectively (P< 0.001).

Amoxicillin-Potassium Clavulanate Combination↗
PubMed1993

Evaluation of bacterial interference and beta-lactamase production in management of experimental infection with group A beta-hemolytic streptococci.

The in vivo effects of penicillin and cefprozil therapy on the interaction between organisms commonly recovered from inflamed tonsils were studied by using a subcutaneous abscess model in mice. These organisms were group A beta-hemolytic streptococci (GABHS), Streptococcus salivarius (which is capable of interfering with GABHS), and Staphylococcus aureus. In mice infected with GABHS and S. salivarius alone or in combination, penicillin eliminated both organisms and cefprozil eliminated GABHS and S. aureus but not S. salivarius. Penicillin did not, however, reduce the number of GABHS or S. salivarius in the presence of S. aureus. The present study demonstrated the ability of beta-lactamase-producing S. aureus to protect GABHS from penicillin. However, no such protection was present following the administration of cefprozil. Furthermore, the preservation of S. salivarius that interferes with GABHS growth may provide protection from reinfection with GABHS. This study supports and provides an explanation for the increased efficacies of cephalosporins administered orally over that of penicillin when treating patients with acute GABHS pharyngitis or tonsillitis.

Abscess↗
PubMed2004

Susceptibility of Streptococcus pneumoniae, Haemophilus influenzae, and Moraxella catarrhalis to 17 oral antimicrobial agents based on pharmacodynamic parameters: 1998-2001 U S Surveillance Study.

Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters were used to interpret susceptibility data for the oral agents tested in a clinically meaningful way. Among S pneumoniae isolates, >99% were susceptible to respiratory fluoroquinolones, 91.6% to amoxicillin, 92.1% to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (95.2% at the extended-release formulation breakpoint), 90.6% to clindamycin, 80.4% to doxycycline, 71.0% to azithromycin, 72.3% to clarithromycin, 71.8% to cefprozil and cefdinir, 72.6% to cefuroxime axetil, 66.3% to cexime, 63.7% to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, and 19.7% to cefaclor. Among H influenzae isolates, 28.6% were b-lactamase positive, but virtually all were susceptible to amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (98.3%, with 99.8% at the extended-release formulation breakpoint), cexime (100%), and uoroquinolones (99.8%), whereas 93.5% were susceptible to cefdinir, 82.8% to cefuroxime axetil, 78.1% to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, 70.2% to amoxicillin, 25.1% to doxycycline, 23.2% to cefprozil, and 5% to cefaclor, azithromycin and clarithromycin. Most isolates of M catarrhalis were resistant to amoxicillin, cefaclor, cefprozil, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. Thus significant b-lactam and macrolide/azalide resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae and b-lactamase production and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole resistance in untypeable Haemophilus influenzae are still present. The results of this study should therefore be applied to clinical practice based on the clinical presentation of the patient, the probability of the patient's having a bacterial rather than a viral infection, the natural history of the disease, the potential of pathogens to be susceptible to various oral antimicrobial agents, the potential for cross-resistance between agents with S pneumoniae, and the potential for pathogens to develop further resistance. Antibiotics should be used judiciously to maintain remaining activity and chosen carefully based on activity determined by pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic-based breakpoints to avoid these bacteria developing further resistance, particularly to fluoroquinolones.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2004

Failure to eradicate Group A beta-haemolytic streptococci (GABHS) from the upper respiratory tract after antibiotic treatment.

The clinical efficacy, safety and bacteriological eradication of Group A beta-haemolytic streptococci (GABHS) from the throat was studied after treatment of streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis with three commonly used oral antibiotics in a prospective, open labelled, comparative, randomised trial of 265 evaluable patients seen in one centre. All three antibiotics were administered in the recommended doses; penicillin V q8 hourly and clarithromycin q12 hourly were given for 10 days and cefprozil q12 hourly for 5 days. Clinical results and adverse events were similar for all three antibiotics used, with a prompt clinical outcome of >95%. Cefprozil had the best bacteriological eradication rate (failed to eradicate: 13.2, 15.1, 2.3; relapses: 13.2, 11.4, 5.7%, for penicillin, clarithromycin and cefprozil, respectively). Oral penicillin remains a clinically effective and safe antibiotic for the treatment of streptococcal pharyngitis. However, compliance and convenience for parents and children when they are asked to follow a 10 days course, especially when the patient has improved from the second or third day, together with the high incidence of bacteriological eradication failures, is an issue.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed2003

Activity of nine oral agents against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria encountered in community-acquired infections: use of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic breakpoints in the comparative assessment of beta-lactam and macrolide antimicrobial agents.

BACKGROUND: The application of pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) data in conjunction with minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of antibacterial agents has been shown to allow for improved selection and appropriate dosing of antimicrobial agents for specific infections, increasing the likelihood of bacteriologic cure and, through this, reducing the risk for the development of resistant organisms. OBJECTIVES: This study was undertaken to provide data on current levels of resistance among common community-acquired bacterial species to 7 betalactam antimicrobial agents (including the combination product amoxicillin/clavulanate), azithromycin, and clarithromycin, determined through application of the PK/PD breakpoints based on time-above-MIC for the beta-lactams and the nonazalide macrolide clarithromycin, and on 24-hour serum area under the curve divided by MIC for the azalide macrolide azithromycin. METHODS: The antimicrobial products tested were amoxicillin/clavylanate, cefpodoxime, cefdinir, cefditoren, cefprozil, cefuroxime, cefixime, azithromycin, and clarithromycin. The bacterial species comprised 70 penicillin-susceptible, 68 penicillin-intermediate, and 69 penicillin-resistant strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae; 46 beta-lactamase-positive and 54 beta-lactamase-negative strains of Haemophilus influenzae; 49 strains of Moraxella catarrhalis; and 100 methicillin-sensitive strains of Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA). Strains were isolated from clinical specimens obtained from outpatient-acquired infections in 1 clinical center in the Northeast and 1 in the north-central area of the United States within the past 2 years. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards microdilution MIC methodology was used. PK/PD breakpoints were obtained from previously published studies and were based on blood values. RESULTS: Amoxicillin/clavulanate was the product to which the greatest percentage of susceptible, intermediate, and resistant strains of pneumococci were sensitive at the PK/PD breakpoint, followed by cefditoren, cefpodoxime, cefuroxime, cefdinir, and cefprozil. None of the cephalosporins were active against penicillin-resistant pneumococci. Cefditoren and cefpodozime were the agents to which the greatest percentage of beta-lactamase-positive and beta-lactamase-negative strains of H influenzae were sensitive, followed by amoxicillin/clavulanate, cefdinir, and cefuroxime. Cefprozil was inactive against H influenzae. All of the beta-lactam products were active against M catarrhalis. All but cefpodoxime, cefditoren, and cefixime were active against MSSA. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, based on PK/PD breakpoints, amoxicillin/clavulanate had the best overall activity of the 9 antimicrobial products tested. Cefpodoxime and cefditoren were active against >or=90% of strains of penicillin-susceptible and penicillin-intermediate pneumococci, H influenzae, and M catarrhalis. The macrolides azithromycin and clarithromycin were active against penicillin-susceptible and penicillin-intermediate pneumococci and M catarrhalis; they were inactive against H influenzae and penicillin-resistant pneumococci.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1996

In vitro susceptibilities of 176 clinical isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae to 11 beta-lactams, erythromycin, and tetracycline.

One hundred seventy six consecutive, non-duplicate pneumococcal isolates from clinical specimens collected from November 1994 through February 1995 in nine general hospitals throughout Belgium were tested for their in vitro susceptibilities to penicillin, ampicillin, amoxycillin with and without clavulanate, cefaclor, cefuroxime, cefonicid, cefprozil, cefpodoxime, cefotaxime, imipenem, tetracycline, and erythromycin by means of the NCCLS microdilution test. The overall rate of decreased susceptibility to penicillin was 12.5%, including 6.3% of intermediately and 6.3% of fully resistant isolates. Penicillin, ampicillin amoxycillin, amoxycillin/clavulanate, cefuroxime, cefotaxime and imipenem had the highest activity on a weight basis (MIC50 < or = 0.008 microgram/ml), followed by cefpodoxime and erythromycin (MIC50 of 0.015 microgram/ml), cefprozil and tetracycline (MIC50 of 0.12 microgram/ml), and eventually, cefaclor and cefonicid (MIC50 of 0.5 microgram/ml). Aggregate rates of susceptible plus intermediately resistant isolates at NCCLS-recommended breakpoints, i.e. overall percentages of isolates likely to respond to increased antibiotic doses in vivo (except for meningitis), were 100.0% for imipenem and cefotaxime, 98.9% for amoxycillin with and without clavulanate, 93.8% for penicillin, and 90.9% for cefuroxime. Overall rates of susceptibility to erythromycin and tetracycline amounted to 78.4% and 72.7%, respectively. MIC values of all beta-lactams increased with those of penicillin. Ampicillin was equally active as penicillin against isolates with reduced susceptibility to the latter (MIC90 of 2 micrograms/ml); imipenem, cefotaxime, and amoxycillin with and without clavulanate however, were more active (MIC90 3, 1, and 1 doubling dilution, respectively, below that of penicillin), while cefpodoxime, cefuroxime, cefprozil, cefonicid, and cefaclor on the other hand, were less active (MIC90, 1, 1, 2, 5, and 5 doubling dilutions, respectively, above that of penicillin). In conclusion, the present data confirm that pneumococcal resistance to penicillin has increased in Belgium, suggest that resistance to erythromycin may have stabilised, and reveal an unexpectedly high rate of resistance to tetracycline. Imipenem was the most active antibiotic tested overall, and amoxycillin with or without clavulanate the most active oral antibiotic, with activity almost similar to that of cefotaxime.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMed1996

Properties of azithromycin that enhance the potential for compliance in children with upper respiratory tract infections.

BACKGROUND: Azithromycin, the prototypical azalide antibiotic, has a wide spectrum of activity that is characterized by resistance to beta-lactamase-producing microbes and efficacy against Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens, including Haemophilus influenzae. Tissue-directed pharmacokinetics include tissue concentrations up to 100-fold higher than those in plasma and a tissue half-life of up to 4 days. Pharmacokinetics of azithromycin permits a reduction in dosage frequency and duration while maintaining efficacy comparable to that of conventional 7- to 10-day three or four times daily regimens. Dosage interval, duration of treatment, side effects and palatability can affect compliance and thus clinical outcome. Compliance among children is important in light of the high incidence of community-acquired infections such as otitis media and streptococcal pharyngitis. OBJECTIVE: To compare the flavor, taste acceptability and color preference of oral antibiotic suspensions given to children. METHODS: The taste and acceptability of the oral suspension form of azithromycin vs. cefixime, cefpodoxime proxetil, cefprozil, clarithromycin or loracarbef were rated by children during blinded taste tests and with acceptability/ preference questionnaires. RESULTS: Analysis of the mean acceptability/ preference rating from 769 children demonstrated that the flavor of azithromycin was rated significantly higher than that of cefpodoxime (4.3 vs. 2.8), cefprozil (4.0 vs. 3.4) and clarithromycin (4.3 vs. 2.7) and was comparable to that of cefixime (4.0 vs. 4.2) and loracarbef (4.4 vs. 4.5). A greater percentage of children preferred the taste of azithromycin to that of cefpodoxime (90.0% vs. 5.2%), cefprozil (63.0% vs. 33.1%) and clarithromycin (89.0% vs. 11.0%). The taste of azithromycin was not preferred to that of cefixime (39.0% vs. 53.9%) or loracarbef (36% vs. 58.5%). CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy and safety of azithromycin in otitis media and streptococcal pharyngitis, the simple dosing regimen and a highly palatable oral suspension formulation should increase compliance among pediatric patients and thereby improve clinical outcomes.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1995

Comparative in vitro activities of azithromycin, Bay y 3118, levofloxacin, sparfloxacin, and 11 other oral antimicrobial agents against 194 aerobic and anaerobic bite wound isolates.

The activities of sparfloxacin, levofloxacin, Bay y 3118, azithromycin, cefprozil, loracarbef, and nine other oral antimicrobial agents against 194 aerobic and anaerobic clinical bite wound isolates were determined by the agar dilution method. Sparfloxacin, levofloxacin, and Bay y 3118 were active against all aerobic isolates (MICs at which 90% of the isolates are inhibited [MIC90], < or = 1.0 microgram/ml for sparfloxacin and levofloxacin and 0.1 microgram/ml for Bay y 3118) and many anaerobic isolates, with the exception of the fusobacteria. Azithromycin was more active than erythromycin by 1 to 2 dilutions against many aerobes, including Pasteurella multocida and Eikenella corrodens, and by 2 to 4 dilutions against anaerobic isolates. Cefprozil was more active (MIC90, < or = 1 microgram/ml) than loracarbef (MIC90, < or = 4 micrograms/ml) against aerobic gram-positive isolates, but both had poor activity (MIC90, > or = 16 micrograms/ml) against peptostreptococci. Both cefprozil and loracarbef had MIC90s of < or = 0.5 micrograms/ml against P. multocida.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Antimicrobial activity of new antibiotics against bacterial isolates from a community hospital.

In this study, the antimicrobial activity of several new antibiotics was evaluated using microdilution antimicrobial susceptibility testing against 220 clinically significant isolates obtained from a community hospital. The following antibiotics were studied: loracarbef, cefixime, cefpirome, desacetylcefotaxime, cefpodoxime, cefmetazole, cefepime, cefprozil and fleroxacin. The synergy of two particular drug combinations was evaluated using cefpirome/desacetylcefotaxime and cefpodoxime/desacetylcefotaxime. Cefpirome was clearly the most active antibiotic: 88% of the isolates tested were found to be susceptible. Specifically, this included 89% of enterococci, 84% of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and 33% of Pseudomonas cepacia. All of the antibiotics tested demonstrated excellent activity against isolates of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella, Proteus and Salmonella species. For the other antimicrobials, 57, 50, 64, 65, 76, 74, and 64% of the isolates were sensitive to loracarbef, cefixime, cefmetazole, cefprozil, fleroxacin, desacetylcefotaxime, and cefpodoxime, respectively. Among the gram-positive species, 88 and 92.5% of the isolates were sensitive to cefprozil and cefpirome, respectively. Cefepime and fleroxacin demonstrated the highest gram-negative activity with 85 and 89%, respectively, of the isolates being sensitive. The results of this study highlighted cefepime and cefpirome, which showed high overall in vitro activity against 79 and 88%, respectively, of the isolates tested.

Bacteria↗
PubMed2004

Cefdinir: a review of its use in the management of mild-to-moderate bacterial infections.

Cefdinir (Omnicef) is an oral third-generation cephalosporin with good in vitro activity against many pathogens commonly causative in community-acquired infections. The drug provides good coverage against Haemophilus influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis and penicillin-susceptible Streptococcus pneumoniae, the most common respiratory tract pathogens. Cefdinir is stable to hydrolysis by commonly occurring plasmid-mediated beta-lactamases and retains good activity against beta-lactamase-producing strains of H. influenzae and M. catarrhalis. The drug distributes into various tissues (e.g. sinus and tonsil) and fluids (e.g. middle ear), and has a pharmacokinetic profile that allows for once- or twice-daily administration.Cefdinir, administered for 5 or 10 days, has shown good clinical and bacteriological efficacy in the treatment of a wide range of mild-to-moderate infections of the respiratory tract and skin in adults, adolescents and paediatric patients in randomised, controlled trials. In adults and adolescents, cefdinir is an effective treatment for both lower (acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis [ABECB], community-acquired pneumonia) and upper (acute bacterial rhinosinusitis, streptococcal pharyngitis) respiratory tract infections, and uncomplicated skin infections. Its bacteriological and clinical efficacy in patients with lower respiratory tract infections was equivalent to that of comparator agents (cefprozil [bacteriological only], loracarbef, cefuroxime axetil and cefaclor). In one trial in patients with ABECB, cefdinir produced a higher rate of clinical cure than cefprozil (95% CIs indicated nonequivalence). Cefdinir also produced good clinical and bacteriological responses equivalent to responses with amoxicillin/clavulanic acid in patients with acute bacterial rhinosinusitis. In addition, it was at least as effective as penicillin V (phenoxymethylpenicillin) in streptococcal pharyngitis/tonsillitis and as effective as cefalexin in uncomplicated skin infections. In paediatric patients aged > or =6 months, cefdinir showed similar efficacy to that of amoxicillin/clavulanic acid or cefprozil in acute otitis media, and cefalexin in uncomplicated skin infections. Cefdinir given for 5 or 10 days was at least as effective as penicillin V for 10 days in patients with streptococcal pharyngitis/tonsillitis. Cefdinir is usually well tolerated. Diarrhoea was the most common adverse event in trials in all age groups. Although the incidence of diarrhoea in cefdinir recipients was generally higher than in adults and adolescents treated with comparators, discontinuation rates due to adverse events were generally similar for cefdinir and comparator groups. In conclusion, cefdinir is a third-generation cephalosporin with a broad spectrum of antibacterial activity encompassing pathogens that are commonly causative in infections of the respiratory tract or skin and skin structure. Depending on the infection being treated, cefdinir can be administered as a convenient once- or twice-daily 5- or 10-day regimen. Clinical evidence indicates that cefdinir is an effective and generally well tolerated drug with superior taste over comparator antibacterial agents and is therefore a good option for the treatment of adults, adolescents and paediatric patients with specific mild-to-moderate respiratory tract or skin infections, particularly in areas where beta-lactamase-mediated resistance among common community-acquired pathogens is a concern.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Comparative antimicrobial spectrum and activity of ceftibuten against clinical isolates from West Germany.

The in vitro activity of a new oral cephalosporin, ceftibuten, was determined against 837 clinical isolates by agar dilution technique and compared with that of the oral cephalosporins, cefaclor, cefuroxime, cefixime, cefpodoxime, and cefprozil. Against Enterobacteriaceae, ceftibuten was the most active of the compounds. Ceftibuten MIC90s were less than or equal to 0.25 micrograms/ml for most members of the family Enterobacteriaceae, 0.13 microgram/ml for Haemophilus influenzae, 4 micrograms/ml for Moraxella catarrhalis, and 0.5 microgram/ml for Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Ceftibuten also was active against beta-haemolytic streptococci (serogroups A, C, and G) and penicillin-susceptible strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae (MIC90, 4 micrograms/ml), but was not active against Staphylococcus spp. or the anaerobic bacteria studied. Cefpodoxime and cefuroxime were the most active of the cephalosporins against nonenteric streptococci; cefprozil and cefuroxime were the most active against staphylococci, and cefaclor demonstrated the greatest activity against some Bacteroides spp. Most strains of Acinetobacter baumanii, Pseudomonas spp., and methicillin-resistant staphylococci, as well as all strains of Clostridium difficile, were resistant to each of the cephalosporins tested.

Anti-Infective Agents, Urinary↗
PubMed1997

In vitro activities of oral antimicrobial agents against penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae: implications for outpatient treatment.

We tested 83 penicillin-intermediate (Peni) and 50 penicillin-resistant (Penr) isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae against eight oral antimicrobials. Clarithromycin's MICs (minimal inhibitory concentration) were generally the same or one to two dilutions less than those of azithromycin. Seventy-two percent of Peni isolates were susceptible to clarithromycin and azithromycin, in contrast to 42% and 40%, respectively, of Penr isolates. Cefuroxime activity exceeded that of cefprozil, which exceeded that of cefaclor, in Peni isolates. For all three cephalosporins, MICs of 90% of isolates tested were > or = 3 dilutions higher for Penr isolates than for Peni isolates. Percentages of Peni isolates susceptible to clindamycin and tetracycline were 92% and 83%, respectively, and 78% and 82% for Penr. Only 49% of Peni isolates and 4% of Penr isolates were susceptible to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. Azithromycin, clarithromycin, cefuroxime, cefprozil, clindamycin, and tetracycline may be useful in treating infections caused by Peni S pneumoniae, but Penr isolates are frequently resistant to both old and newer agents.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2007

Comparative effects of single-dose ceftriaxone versus three oral antibiotic regimens on stool colonization by resistant bacilli in children.

OBJECTIVE: The use of short-term intramuscular ceftriaxone for pediatric ambulatory conditions raises concerns regarding the promotion of resistance among colonizing enteric bacteria. This study was designed to assess the prevalence of stool colonization with resistant Gram-negative bacilli after single-dose ceftriaxone treatment compared with other regimens for acute otitis media. METHODS: Children age 3 months to 7 years and diagnosed with acute otitis media were randomized to receive treatment with single-dose ceftriaxone or with oral cefprozil, amoxicillin or azithromycin. Stool samples were obtained at enrollment and then 3-5 days, 10-14 days, and 28-30 days after therapy was initiated and screened for the presence of facultative Gram-negative bacilli resistant to ceftriaxone, cefprozil, amoxicillin, piperacillin, piperacillin-tazobactam and tobramycin. Mean prevalence of colonization by resistant organisms for each treatment group was compared at each time point. RESULTS: One thousand nine subjects were enrolled. The prevalence of colonization by a Gram-negative bacillus resistant to at least 1 of the screening antibiotics decreased after receipt of ceftriaxone but returned close to values measured at study entry by 30 days. A qualitatively similar pattern was noted for the 3 other regimens, but a quantitatively greater decrease in the prevalence of colonization by a resistant bacterium was noted at the 3- to 5-day and 10- to 14-day visits among azithromycin recipients (P < 0.001). Colonization by a Gram-negative bacillus resistant specifically to ceftriaxone was unusual at each study visit, regardless of treatment assignment. CONCLUSIONS: A single intramuscular dose of ceftriaxone had a similar effect on the prevalence of antibiotic-resistant Gram-negative facultative bacilli in the stool of healthy children when compared with commonly used oral agents.

Acute Disease↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Pharmacodynamic activity of five oral cephalosporins against Haemophilus influenzae.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To determine the time above minimum inhibitory concentration (T > MIC) and serum bactericidal activity of five oral cephalosporins against two strains of Haemophilus influenzae. DESIGN: Randomized, crossover study. SETTING: University-associated research center. SUBJECTS: Ten healthy volunteers. INTERVENTIONS: Each subject received a single dose of cefpodoxime 200 mg, cefuroxime 500 mg, cefaclor 500 mg, cefprozil 500 mg, or loracarbef 400 mg each week for 5 weeks. Blood for serum levels was obtained at time zero and 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 12 hours after each dose. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Cefpodoxime produced serum concentrations above the MIC for more than 90% of the time for both beta-lactamase-negative and -positive strains of H. influenzae. Moreover, it had serum bactericidal activity for 12 hours against both isolates. Cefuroxime was the second most active cephalosporin, with serum concentrations above the MIC of both isolates for 60% of the time. Cefuroxime provided serum bactericidal activity for 12 hours against the beta-lactamase-negative strain and 6 hours against the beta-lactamase-positive strain of H. influenzae. Even though the T > MIC was less than 50% of the study period for the other cephalosporins, all but cefaclor provided serum bactericidal activity for 12 hours against the beta-lactamase-negative isolate. Cefaclor provided measurable serum bactericidal activity for only 3 hours. The duration of serum bactericidal activity of cefprozil, loracarbef, and cefaclor against the beta-lactamase-positive isolate was 4, 2, and 0 hours, respectively. CONCLUSION: Cefpodoxime was the most active cephalosporin studied based on T > MIC and serum bactericidal activity against isolates of H. influenzae.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

[Antibacterial activity and beta-lactamase stability of eleven oral cephalosporins].

Oral cephalosporins (cefixime, cefdinir, cefetamet, ceftibuten, cefpodoxime, loracarbef, cefprozil, cefuroxime, cefaclor, cefadroxil and BAY 3522) were compared by their antibacterial profile including stability against new beta-lactamases. Both activity and antibacterial spectrum of compounds structurally related to third generation parenteral cephalosporins (of the oximino class) were superior to established compounds. Activity against staphylococci was found to be highest for cefdinir, cefprozil and BAY 3522. Cefetamet, ceftibuten and cefixime demonstrate no clinically meaningful antistaphylococcal activity while the other compounds investigated demonstrate intermediate activity. The antibacterial spectrum was broadest for cefdinir and cefpodoxime. New oral cephalosporins are equally inactive as established compounds against Enterobacter spp., Morganella, Listeria, Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter spp., methicillin-resistant staphylococci, Enterococcus spp., penicillin-resistant pneumococci and anaerobes. New extended broad-spectrum betalactamases (TEM-3, TEM-5, TEM-6, TEM-7, SHV-2, SHV-3, SHV-4, SHV-5, CMY-1, CMY-2, and CTX-M) are active against the majority of oral cephalosporins. Ceftibuten, cefetamet, cefixime and cefdinir were stable against some of these enzymes even to a higher extent than parenteral cephalosporins. New oral cephalosporins should improve the therapeutic perspectives of oral cephalosporins due to their higher activity against pathogens marginally susceptible to established compounds (higher multiplicity of maximum plasma concentrations over MICs of the pathogens) and furthermore by including in their spectrum organisms resistant to established absorbable cephalosporins (e.g. Proteus spp., Providencia spp., Citrobacter spp., and Serratia spp.).

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2004

Use of oral cephalosporins in the treatment of acute otitis media in children.

The selection of the most effective antimicrobial to treat acute otitis media (AOM) has become more difficult in recent years because of increasing antibiotic resistance among all AOM pathogens. Resistance of Streptococcus pneumoniae to penicillin as well as amoxicillin ranges from 30 to 55% in the USA. Currently, 40-55% of Haemophilus influenzae and 90-100% of Moraxella catarrhalis are resistant to penicillin because of the production of Beta-lactamases. This review discusses the availability of oral cephalosporins that can be utilised for the treatment of AOM in children. An evaluation is made regarding their in vitro activity against the pathogens, their middle-ear concentrations, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (PK/PD). The cephalosporins that will be discussed are cefuroxime-axetil, cefprozil, cefdinir and cefpodoxime-proxetil. The current recommendations for therapy of AOM limit the choices of clinicians to a single cephalosporin (cefuroxime-axetil). However, clinical, bacteriological and PK/PD data shows that several other cephalosporins (cefprozil, cefdinir and cefpodoxime-proxetil) possess similar indices which provide the clinician with wider therapeutic choices that can insure better compliance and ultimately better success in eradication of the infection.

Acute Disease↗