Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Capitation Fee”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 145 records · Page 8Linked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

Outcomes for medicaid clients with substance abuse problems before and after managed care.

Medicaid conversion from fee for service to managed care raised numerous questions about outcomes for substance abuse treatment clients. For example, managed care criticisms include concerns that clients will be undertreated (with too short and/or insufficiently intense services). Also of interest are potential variations in outcome for clients served by organizations with assorted financial arrangements such as for-profit status versus not-for-profit status. In addition, little information is available about the impact of state Medicaid managed care policies (including client eligibility) on treatment outcomes. Subjects of this project were Medicaid clients aged 18-64 years enrolled in the Oregon Health Plan during 1994 (before substance abuse treatment managed care, N = 1751) or 1996-1997 (after managed care, N = 14,813), who were admitted to outpatient non-methadone chemical dependency treatment services. Outcome measures were retention in treatment for 90 days or more, completion of a treatment program, abstinence at discharge, and readmission to treatment. With the exception of readmission, there were no notable differences in outcomes between the fee for service era clients versus those in capitated chemical dependency treatment. There were at most minor differences among various managed care systems (such as for-profit vs not-for-profit). However, duration of Medicaid eligibility was a powerful predictor of positive outcomes. Medicaid managed care does not appear to have had an adverse impact on outcomes for clients with substance abuse problems. On the other hand, state policies influencing Medicaid enrollment may have substantial impact on chemical dependency treatment outcomes.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Plan choice and changes in access to care over time for SSI-eligible children with disabilities.

This paper analyzes how voluntary enrollment in the fee-for-service (FFS) system versus a partially capitated managed care plan affects changes in access to care over time for special needs children who receive Supplemental Security Income (SSI) due to a disability. Four indicators of access are evaluated, including specialty care, hospital care, emergency care, and access to a regular doctor. We employ the Heckman two-step estimation procedure to correct for the potential nonrandom selection bias linked to plan choice. The findings show that relative to their counterparts in the partially capitated managed care plan, SSI children enrolled in the FFS plan are significantly more likely to encounter an access problem during either of the time periods studied. Similarly, FFS enrollees are significantly more likely than partially capitated managed care participants to experience persistent access problems across three of the four dimensions of care. Possible explanations for the deterioration in access associated with FFS include the lack of case management services, lower reimbursement relative to the partially capitated managed care plan, and provider availability.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1992

Capitation: a service by another name.

Fee for service and capitation systems are usually regarded as different methods of medical remuneration, however, they can be seen to differ mainly in the degree to which they 'bundle' or 'package' medical services. A capitation system for general practice services in Australia could be established by the creation of a Medicare item and benefit for a year's general practice care. This would allow doctors to assess the benefits of capitation without a total and potentially traumatic commitment, and may encourage innovation in the efficient delivery of primary health care.

Australia↗
PubMed1987

An analysis of methods to reform Medicare payment for physician services.

Congress and the administration are changing Medicare's method of paying for physician services, with the intention of reducing the growth in or absolute level of Medicare payment rates. We analyzed the implications of four possible strategies for payment reform: modifications to the present system of paying by customary, prevailing, and reasonable (CPR) charges; payment based on fee schedules; payment for packages of related services; and capitation payment. In some cases, improved quality or access may result. The inherent danger is that constraining program expenditures may impair access to and quality of care to beneficiaries, especially for poor or infirm people, who are more vulnerable. Thus, any payment reform will require careful monitoring to safeguard beneficiaries' quality of care.

Capitation Fee↗
PubMed1996

Medical loss ratios under scrutiny.

Medical loss ratios indicate the proportion of total operating revenue spent for health care. Managed care organizations monitor these ratios carefully to keep them from surpassing predetermined targets. The same is true of administrative expense ratios. Low medical loss and high administrative expense ratios have become political hot buttons for advocacy groups unhappy with managed care's growing displacement for fee-for-service medicine.

Capitation Fee↗
PubMed1996

Redefining private insurance in a changing market structure.

This discussion on likely changes and challenges for the health insurance industry over the coming decade assumes that significant national reform of health care financing for the privately insured population will not occur--or, if it does, that it will mirror the insurance market reforms that many states already have undertaken. First, the changes in private insurance coverage during the past several years are considered, with particular attention to the erosion of employer-based coverage and to the rising influence of public insurance programs--especially Medicaid--on the private insurance market. Next is a description of the changing web of state laws and regulations governing private health insurance. At this writing, virtually every state has enacted or is considering reforms of the small group market to limit what many perceive as unfair or destructive insurer practices and to set new ground rules for competition among insurance arrangements. The changing nature of private insurance contracts in the United States is considered next. Evolving from conventional fee-for-service contracts, private insurance is increasingly a complex mixture of capitation, partial capitation, and reinsurance of capitated arrangements. Finally, this chapter discusses three issues of increasing importance in shaping the marketplace for private insurers: (1) the federal preemption of states' regulatory authority over self-insured employer plans; (2) emerging state regulation to restructure competition in the health insurance and health care markets; and (3) the growing interest of both federal and state governments in medical savings accounts to finance health insurance and health care spending.

Capitation Fee↗
PubMed1997

How can vascular surgery survive capitated care?

The basic differences between fee-for-service and capitated care are characterized and how they are likely to impact the practicing vascular surgeon are explored. Likely practice scenarios under capitated care are given. If the potential problems associated with using primary care "gate keeper" physicians materialize, secondary "carveouts" by vascular specialists may prove feasible. The alternative, particularly in large patient care consortiums, is to educate gatekeepers with efficient management algorythms in exchange for appropriate referrals. In spite of demonstrable flaws and abuses, capitated, managed care is likely to persist in some form, as an effective way to control spiraling health care costs. Therefore, vascular surgeons need to be prepared to compete under such systems. The major keys to success are efficient use of diagnostic tests, applying conservative, cost conscious indications for intervention, and efficient use of hospital resources (judged by lengths of stay in the intensive care unit and hospital and readmissions under the same diagnosis). In addition to developing better practice profiles, in these and standard mortality and morbity parameters, vascular surgeons need to create or join an efficient practice environment, with a minimum number of efficient personnel and teaching and research costs tightly controlled. To negotiate contracts effectively, vascular surgeons must know their costs, of delivering care on a per capita basis in their environment, adjusted for specific (eg, working or retired) patient populations. Outcomes and cost comparisons and other management research must vie for attention with new technology and basic research.

Capitation Fee↗
PubMed1989

A trial of a capitation system of payment for the treatment of children in the General Dental Service. Final report. Dental Health Services Research Unit, University of Manchester. September, 1989.

A 3-year clinical trial comparing capitation and fee-for-service remuneration systems for general dental practitioners for the treatment of children has been successfully completed. Capitation dentists restored carious teeth at a later stage in the disease process than fee-for-service controls, and carried out more preventive treatment and advice. However, the disease experience of their patients was little different from that of patients treated under fee-for-service. Capitation dentists saw their patients less frequently and took fewer radiographs than their fee-for-service colleagues. The prevalence of both fissue sealants and arrested caries was low in both groups, as was the prevalence of teeth extracted as a result of caries. Levels of oral cleanliness were similar under both systems. Private treatment was rarely prescribed for children, but was more prevalent for patients of fee-for-service dentists. The profession felt that capitation offered greater clinical freedom and more financial stability to dentists, but a greater temptation to under-prescribe treatment. The profession lacked commitment to capitation as a method of remuneration for the treatment of children in the General Dental Service. Fee-for-service dentists appeared to be more innovative, expressed a greater allegiance to their patients and felt a greater temptation to over-prescribe than capitation dentists. The parents had a high opinion of the service for children, irrespective of the remuneration system, and the children found the service very acceptable. Parents had a stronger allegiance to the fee-for-service than the capitation dentists. The study revealed several short-comings in the capitation model tested, but solutions to all of these became apparent. A capitation agreement of more than 12 months would simplify administration and reduce costs, as would a reduction in the number of forms. The need to notify parents when a dentist was replaced in a practice created considerable difficulties and increased expense. The treatment of trauma and extractions for orthodontic purposes should have been items excluded from the capitation fee. The need for information on dentists' activity in capitation was accepted but should be kept simple and relevant. Monitoring quality of care under capitation can be carried out from the routine data collected for administrative purposes. Capitation does not appear to increase participation. Costs of administering capitation are little different from those for fee-for-service. More resources were spent per dentist and per patient under capitation than fee-for-service. In the clinical trial fee-for-service was more cost-effective than capitation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Adolescent↗