Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Caloric Tests”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 145 records · Page 8Linked to original sources
PubMed1997

[Stimulating conditions of cold air caloric test].

This study is to clarify the effects of stimulating conditions on caloric response evoked by cold air stimulation. The five parameters of caloric nystagmus (latency, maximum slow phase velocity [Max. spv], Max. spv arrival time, frequency and duration) were examined. The different stimulating air temperature(0 degree C, 5 degrees C, 10 degrees C, 15 degrees C, 20 degrees C), flow rate (3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 6.0 l/m) and period(30, 45, 60, 90 sec) were used to evoke caloric nystagmus in normal subjects. 1. Effect to temperature When the intensity of air irrigation temperature increased, Max. spv, frequency and duration also tended to increase. Out of the five parameters, the duration of caloric nystagmus was the most relevant to the intensity of irrigation temperature. 2. Effect of stimulating period When the period of caloric stimuli increased, the Max. spv and its duration also increased. But, when the stimulating period was 90 seconds, the slow phase velocity reached to the maximum responses 60 seconds after starting the stimulation. Therefore, it is not necessary to stimulate for more than 60 seconds. 3. Caloric response evoked by 60 sec, 5.0 l/m at 5 degrees C air irrigation showed the same response as the caloric nystagmus provoked by 20 ml of water at 20 degrees C for 20 sec.

Adult↗
PubMed1976

The air caloric test. A parametric study.

We studied the normal air caloric response's intensity and variability. Intensities of "preliminary standard" (47 C, 25 C, 60 seconds, 10 liters/min) air and standard bithermal water responses were the same, but the air responses were more variable. Control experiments suggested that the tendency of the air stream to equilibrate toward ambient may account for much of air's relatively high variability. Increasing the air irrigation's duration, flow rate, and separation from body temperature increased response intensity. Air's test-retest variability decreased when flow rate and duration increased and when temperature approached ambient. Therefore, we suggested that irrigating temperatures be chosen as close to ambient as possible and duration and flow rate be made as large as possible. From a table equating air and standard bithermal water responses, we selected tentative clinical air irrigation parameters of 27.5 C, 45.5 C, 100 seconds, and 13 liters/min.

Adolescent↗