Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “ACTIN”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 145 records · Page 8Linked to original sources

A mammalian actin substitution in yeast actin (H372R) causes a suppressible mitochondria/vacuole phenotype.

To determine the reason for the inviability of Saccharomyces cerevisiae with skeletal muscle actin, we introduced into yeast actin the first variant muscle residue from the C-terminal end, H372R. Arg is also found at this position in non-yeast nonmuscle actins. The substitution caused retarded growth on glucose and an inability to use glycerol as a sole carbon source. The mitochondria were clumped and had lost their DNA, the vacuole appeared hypervesiculated, and the actin cytoskeleton became somewhat depolarized. Introduction of the second muscle actin-specific substitution, S365A, rescued these defects. Suppression was also achieved by introducing the four acidic N-terminal residues of muscle actin in place of the two found in yeast actin. The H372R substitution results in an increase in polymerization-dependent fluorescence of Cys-374 pyrene-labeled actin. H372R actin polymerizes slightly faster than wild-type (WT) actin. Yeast actin-related proteins 2 and 3 (Arp2/3) accelerates the polymerization of H372R actin to a much greater extent than WT actin. The two suppressors did not affect the rate of H372R actin polymerization in the absence of an Arp2/3 complex. In contrast, the S365A substitution dampened the rate of Arp2/3 complex-stimulated H372R actin polymerization, and the addition of the four acidic N-terminal residues caused this rate to decrease below that observed with WT actin in the presence of Arp2/3. Structural analysis of the mutations suggests the presence of stringent steric and ionic requirements for the bottom of actin subdomain 1 and also suggests that there is allosteric communication through subdomain 1 within the actin monomer between the N and C termini.

Actins↗

Actin and actin-binding proteins in bovine spermatozoa: potential role in membrane remodeling and intracellular signaling during epididymal maturation and the acrosome reaction.

The actin cytoskeleton influences a wide range of functions in nonmuscle somatic cells, including shape, movement, and interactions with extracellular matrices. The role of actin in mammalian male germ cells, however, particularly during post-testicular development, is not well understood. In this paper, we examine 1) the distribution of 3 actin-regulatory proteins (thymosin beta10, destrin, and a testis-specific actin capping protein) involved in controlling the balance between actin monomers (G-actin) and actin filaments (F-actin), and 2) the distribution and polymerization status of actin in bull spermatozoa during epididymal maturation and following acrosomal exocytosis. Results show that in fixed, permeabilized testicular spermatozoa all 3 regulatory proteins (as determined by binding of specific antibodies) are localized primarily to the acrosomal domain but during epididymal maturation they become confined to the equatorial segment. Following ejaculation, however, they extend back into the acrosomal region. In spermatozoa induced to undergo an acrosome reaction with the calcium ionophore, A23187, further rearrangement occurs with destrin, thymosin beta10, and TS-ACP appearing in the postacrosomal domain. Actin is also found over the acrosome of testicular spermatozoa with both G- and F-actin present, although the 2 forms show slightly different patterns of distribution. Subsequently, actin in the sperm head is largely confined to the equatorial segment until F-actin appears in the postacrosomal domain of acrosome-reacted spermatozoa. This redistribution of actin and actin-regulatory proteins, coupled with changing levels of actin polymerization, suggest a continuing role for actin in both post-testicular sperm maturation and acrosomal exocytosis.

Acrosome Reaction↗

Differential regulation of actin depolymerizing factor and cofilin in response to alterations in the actin monomer pool.

Myoblasts, transfected with a human gene encoding a beta-actin point mutation, down-regulate expression of actin depolymerizing factor (ADF) and its mRNA. Regulation is posttranscriptional. Expression of cofilin, a structurally similar protein, and profilin, CapG, and tropomodulin is not altered with increasing mutant beta-actin expression. Myoblasts expressing either human gamma-actin or the mutant beta-actin down-regulate the endogenous mouse actin genes to keep a constant level of actin mRNA, whereas the gamma-actin transfectants do not down-regulate ADF. Thus, ADF expression is regulated differently from actin expression. The mutant beta-actin binds to ADF with about the same affinity as normal actin; however, it does not assemble into normal actin filaments. The decrease in ADF expression correlates with an increase in the unassembled actin pool. When the actin monomer pool in untransfected myoblasts is increased 70% by treatment with latrunculin A, synthesis of ADF and actin are down-regulated compared with cofilin and 19 other proteins selected at random. Increasing the actin monomer pool also results in nearly complete phosphorylation of both ADF and cofilin. Thus, ADF and cofilin are coordinately regulated by posttranslational modification, but their expression is differentially regulated. Furthermore, expression of ADF is responsive to the utilization of actin by the cell.

Actin Depolymerizing Factors↗

Two Caenorhabditis elegans actin depolymerizing factor/cofilin proteins, encoded by the unc-60 gene, differentially regulate actin filament dynamics.

The Caenorhabditis elegans unc-60 gene encodes two actin depolymerizing factor/cofilin proteins which are implicated in the regulation of actin filament assembly in body wall muscle. We examined the interaction of recombinant UNC-60A and B proteins with actin and found that they differentially regulate actin filament dynamics. Co-pelleting assays with F-actin showed that UNC-60A depolymerized but did not remain bound to F-actin, whereas UNC-60B bound to but did not depolymerize F-actin. In the pH range of 6.8-8.0, the apparent activities of UNC-60A and B did not change although UNC-60A showed greater actin-depolymerizing activity at higher pH. These activities were further confirmed by a light scattering assay and electron microscopy. The effects of these proteins on actin polymerization were quite different. UNC-60A inhibited polymerization in a concentration-dependent manner. On the other hand, UNC-60B strongly inhibited the nucleation process but accelerated the following elongation step. However, an excess amount of UNC-60B increased the amount of unpolymerized actin. These results indicate that UNC-60A depolymerizes actin filaments and inhibits actin polymerization, whereas UNC-60B strongly binds to F-actin without depolymerizing it and, through binding to G-actin, changes the rate of actin polymerization depending on the UNC-60B:actin ratio. These data suggest that the two UNC-60 isoforms play differential roles in regulating actin filament dynamics in vivo.

Actin Depolymerizing Factors↗

Control of actin filament length by phosphorylation of fragmin-actin complex.

Fragmin is a Ca2(+)-sensitive F-actin-severing protein purified from a slime mold, Physarum polycephalum (Hasegawa, T., S. Takahashi, H. Hayashi, and S. Hatano. 1980. Biochemistry. 19:2677-2683). It binds to G-actin to form a 1:1 fragmin/actin complex in the presence of micromolar free Ca2+. The complex nucleates actin polymerization and caps the barbed end of the short F-actin (Sugino, H., and S. Hatano. 1982. Cell Motil. 2:457-470). Subsequent removal of Ca2+, however, hardly dissociates the complex. This complex nucleates actin polymerization and caps the F-actin regardless of Ca2+ concentration. Here we report that this activity of fragmin-actin complex can be abolished by phosphorylation of actin of the complex. When crude extract from Physarum plasmodium was incubated with 5 mM ATP and 1 mM EGTA, the activities of the complex decreased to a great extent. The inactivation of the complex in the crude extract was not observed in the presence of Ca2+. In addition, the activities of the complex inactivated in the crude extract were restored under conditions suitable for phosphatase reactions. We purified factors that inactivated fragmin-actin complex from the crude extract. These factors phosphorylated actin of the complex, and the activities of the complex decreased with an increased level of phosphorylation of the complex. These factors, termed actin kinase, also inactivated the complex that capped the barbed end of short F-actin, leading to elongation of the short F-actin to long F-actin. Thus the length of F-actin can be controlled by phosphorylation of fragmin-actin complex by actin kinase.

Actin Cytoskeleton↗

Interactions among a fimbrin, a capping protein, and an actin-depolymerizing factor in organization of the fission yeast actin cytoskeleton.

We report studies of the fission yeast fimbrin-like protein Fim1, which contains two EF-hand domains and two actin-binding domains (ABD1 and ABD2). Fim1 is a component of both F-actin patches and the F-actin ring, but not of F-actin cables. Fim1 cross-links F-actin in vitro, but a Fim1 protein lacking either EF-hand domains (Fim1A12) or both the EF-hand domains and ABD1 (Fim1A2) has no actin cross-linking activity. Overexpression of Fim1 induced the formation of F-actin patches throughout the cell cortex, whereas the F-actin patches disappear in cells overexpressing Fim1A12 or Fim1A2. Thus, the actin cross-linking activity of Fim1 is probably important for the formation of F-actin patches. The overexpression of Fim1 also excluded the actin-depolymerizing factor Adf1 from the F-actin patches and inhibited the turnover of actin in these structures. Thus, Fim1 may function in stabilizing the F-actin patches. We also isolated the gene encoding Acp1, a subunit of the heterodimeric F-actin capping protein. fim1 acp1 double null cells showed more severe defects in the organization of the actin cytoskeleton than those seen in each single mutant. Thus, Fim1 and Acp1 may function in a similar manner in the organization of the actin cytoskeleton. Finally, genetic studies suggested that Fim1 may function in cytokinesis in cooperation with Cdc15 (PSTPIP) and Rng2 (IQGAP), respectively.

Actin Depolymerizing Factors↗

Formation and destabilization of actin filaments with tetramethylrhodamine-modified actin.

Actin labeling at Cys(374) with tethramethylrhodamine derivatives (TMR-actin) has been widely used for direct observation of the in vitro filaments growth, branching, and treadmilling, as well as for the in vivo visualization of actin cytoskeleton. The advantage of TMR-actin is that it does not lock actin in filaments (as rhodamine-phalloidin does), possibly allowing for its use in investigating the dynamic assembly behavior of actin polymers. Although it is established that TMR-actin alone is polymerization incompetent, the impact of its copolymerization with unlabeled actin on filament structure and dynamics has not been tested yet. In this study, we show that TMR-actin perturbs the filaments structure when copolymerized with unlabeled actin; the resulting filaments are more fragile and shorter than the control filaments. Due to the increased severing of copolymer filaments, TMR-actin accelerates the polymerization of unlabeled actin in solution also at mole ratios lower than those used in most fluorescence microscopy experiments. The destabilizing and severing effect of TMR-actin is countered by filament stabilizing factors, phalloidin, S1, and tropomyosin. These results point to an analogy between the effects of TMR-actin and severing proteins on F-actin, and imply that TMR-actin may be inappropriate for investigations of actin filaments dynamics.

Actin Cytoskeleton↗

Role of tropomyosin, alpha-actinin, and actin binding protein 280 in stabilizing Triton insoluble F-actin in basal and chemotactic factor activated neutrophils.

F-actin is a major component of the neutrophil (PMN) cytoskeleton. In basal PMNs, F-actin exists in two structurally and functionally distinct pools: Triton insoluble F-actin (TIF)--cold insensitive, not depolymerizable by dilution, and distributed in pseudopods and submembranous locations; and Triton soluble F-actin (TSF)--unstable in cold, diffusely distributed, and gelsolin enriched. The element(s) conferring these unique properties to the Triton insoluble F-actin pool are unknown, but logically include distinct actin regulatory proteins. To study the morphologic and functional determinants of the Triton insoluble F-actin pool, the distribution and quantity of three candidate regulatory proteins, alpha-actinin, tropomyosin (TM), and actin binding protein (ABP-280), were compared in F-actin (Triton insoluble and Triton soluble) and G-actin pools isolated from basal and chemotactic factor activated human PMNs in suspension, using immunoblots and ionic extraction. F-actin content was measured by NBDphallacidin binding and gel scans. The results show that: (1) alpha-actinin, actin binding protein 280, and tropomyosin are localized to TIF and excluded from TSF; (2) TM, alpha-actinin, and ABP 280 are required to stabilize fractions of Triton insoluble F-actin in PMNs; and (3) chemotactic factor activation results in release of a fraction of TM from the Triton insoluble F-actin pool in temporal association with F-actin polymerization in the Triton insoluble F-actin pool. Shifts in ABP 280 or alpha-actinin do not occur. The results suggest that TM, alpha-actinin, and ABP 280 provide structure to TIF and that TM release from TIF is involved in chemotactic factor induced actin polymerization in PMNs.

Actinin↗

The actin-interacting protein AIP1 is essential for actin organization and plant development.

Cell division, growth, and cytoplasmic organization require a dynamic actin cytoskeleton. The filamentous actin (F-actin) network is regulated by actin binding proteins that modulate actin dynamics. These actin binding proteins often have cooperative interactions. In particular, actin interacting protein 1 (AIP1) is capable of capping F-actin and enhancing the activity of the small actin modulating protein, actin depolymerising factor (ADF) in vitro. Here, we analyze the effect of the inducible expression of AIP1 RNAi in Arabidopsis plants to assess AIP1s role in vivo. In intercalary growing cells, the normal actin organization is disrupted, and thick bundles of actin appear in the cytoplasm. Moreover, in root hairs, there is the unusual appearance of actin cables ramifying the root hair tip. We suggest that the reduction in AIP1 results in a decrease in F-actin turnover and the promotion of actin bundling. This distortion of the actin cytoskeleton causes severe plant developmental abnormalities. After induction of the Arabidopis RNAi lines, the cells in the leaves, roots, and shoots fail to expand normally, and in the severest phenotypes, the plants die. Our data suggest that AIP1 is essential for the normal functioning of the actin cytoskeleton in plant development.

Actins↗

ADP-ribosylated actin as part of the actin monomer pool in rat brain.

Mono-ADP-ribosylation in mammals is poorly understood. In this study, we found mono-ADP-ribosylated actin in rat brains. Mono-ADP-ribosylated actin by ADP-ribosyltransferase or nonenzymatic reaction was shown at a different position from the unmodified actin in the isoelectrical focusing. High-pressure liquid chromatography utilizing a reverse phase (ODS) column separated ADP-ribosylated actin from unmodified actin. In the two-dimensional gel electrophoreses and high-pressure liquid chromatography, the endogenously ADP-ribosylated actin was detected in the supernatant fraction from the rat brain extract, where a nonpolymerizing actin was present after removal of the polymerizing actin. The concentration of NAD and ADP-ribose, after microwave irradiation, was 220 nmol and 150 nmol/g of rat brain tissue. Actin ADP-ribosylated by purified ADP-ribosyltransferase failed to form actin filaments after the addition of Mg2+. Actin ADP-ribosylated by the nonenzymatic reaction could polymerize with the addition of Mg2+. The enzymatically modified actin could form actin filaments after treatment with ADP-ribosylhydrolase but not after treatment with phosphodiesterase. These results suggest that ADP-ribosylated actin by enzymatic or nonenzymatic reaction is one of the sequestering factors in actin-actin binding and is a part of the actin pool in the rat brain.

Actins↗

The architecture of actin filaments and the ultrastructural location of actin-binding protein in the periphery of lung macrophages.

A highly branched filament network is the principal structure in the periphery of detergent-extracted cytoskeletons of macrophages that have been spread on a surface and either freeze or critical point dried, and then rotary shadowed with platinum-carbon. This array of filaments completely fills lamellae extended from the cell and bifurcates to form 0.2-0.5 micron thick layers on the top and bottom of the cell body. Reaction of the macrophage cytoskeletons with anti-actin IgG and with anti-IgG bound to colloidal gold produces dense staining of these filaments, and incubation with myosin subfragment 1 uniformly decorates these filaments, identifying them as actin. 45% of the total cellular actin and approximately 70% of actin-binding protein remains in the detergent-insoluble cell residue. The soluble actin is not filamentous as determined by sedimentation analysis, the DNAase I inhibition assay, and electron microscopy, indicating that the cytoskeleton is not fragmented by detergent extraction. The spacing between the ramifications of the actin network is 94 +/- 47 nm and 118 +/- 72 nm in cytoskeletons prepared for electron microscopy by freeze drying and critical point drying, respectively. Free filament ends are rare, except for a few which project upward from the body of the network or which extend down to the substrate. Filaments of the network intersect predominantly at right angles to form either T-shaped and X-shaped overlaps having striking perpendicularity or else Y-shaped intersections composed of filaments intersecting at 120-130 degrees angles. The actin filament concentration in the lamellae is high, with an average value of 12.5 mg/ml. The concentration was much more uniform in freeze-dried preparations than in critical point-dried specimens, indicating that there is less collapse associated with the freezing technique. The orthogonal actin network of the macrophage cortical cytoplasm resembles actin gels made with actin-binding protein. Reaction of cell cytoskeletons and of an actin gel made with actin-binding protein with anti-actin-binding protein IgG and anti-IgG-coated gold beads resulted in the deposition of clusters of gold at points where filaments intersect and at the ends of filaments that may have been in contact with the membrane before its removal with detergent. In the actin gel made with actin-binding protein, 75% of actin-fiber intersections labeled, and the filament spacing between intersections is consistent with that predicted on theoretical grounds if each added actin-binding protein molecule cross-links two filaments to form an intersection in the gel.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Actin Cytoskeleton↗

ADP-ribosylation of nonmuscle actin by component I of botulinum C2 toxin inactivates the ability to interact with unmodified actin.

Botulinum C2 toxin, elaborated by Clostridium botulinum types C and D, is composed of two dissimilar unassociated proteins, designated components I and II. Component I catalyzes ADP-ribosylation of nonmuscle beta- and gamma-actins but not of muscle alpha-actin. The maximal levels of ADP-ribosylation of the actin were about 1.0 mol of ADP-ribose/mol of actin. Sedimentation velocity analysis showed that ADP-ribosylated actin remained in a monomeric state even under polymerization conditions. In addition to the inactivation of self-polymerization ability, the ADP-ribosylated actin affected neither the initial rate nor the final extent of polymerization of unmodified actin as monitored by the increase in fluorescence intensity of N-pyrenyliodoacetamide-labeled actin. Electron microscopy revealed that no filaments or particles were formed from ADP-ribosylated actin in the conditions favorable for polymerization of unmodified actin; moreover, actin filaments produced from unmodified actin in the presence of ADP-ribosylated actin were not distinguishable from those from unmodified actin alone. These results indicate that the introduction of one ADP-ribose residue into the beta/gamma-actin molecule by component I inactivated the actin, preventing not only the self-assembly of the modified actins but also the interaction with unmodified actin.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Actins↗

Exposure of thiol groups and bound nucleotide in G-actin: thiols as an indicator for the native state of actin.

In monomeric actin the number of thiol groups exposed to thiol reagents and the nucleotide bound are found to be correlated. G-actin, prepared as normally in the presence of ATP, exposed one thiol group (nSH = 1). In the presence of 1 equivalent ADP, as found associated with G-actin preparations when no nucleotide is added, the protein exposed four thiol groups (nSH = 4). When G-actin was prepared in a high excess of ADP (50 eq.) two thiol groups became exposed (nSH = 2). Actin also exposed four thiol groups when depolymerized in buffers containing 10 eq. APCPP or APPCP, with a time course of the thiol-titration similar to that obtained when the protein was prepared in a nucleotide-free buffer. When actin was depolymerized in a buffer containing 10 eq. APPNP it also exposed 4 thiols; however, titration kinetics are different. In this case, one thiol group reacted quickly, while the reaction of the three others was retarded. Finally, when actin was depolymerized in the ADP-analog APCP it also exposed four thiol groups, with titration kinetics similar to those obtained for actin in nucleotide free buffer. It was concluded that addition of ATP induced a shielding effect on three out of four thiol groups in monomeric actin. ADP (50 eq.) shielded two of the four thiol groups, while ATP- and ADP-analogs had no shielding effect. The thiol shielding activity and the protective capacity of a nucleotide are interrelated. Actin preparations, in ATP or ADP (high excess) containing buffers, with one or two thiol groups exposed respectively, are stable and polymerizable over many hours. Actin prepared in buffers containing ATP- or ADP-analogs, exposing four thiol groups, is denatured, losing its capacity to polymerize within few hours. Finally, actin preparations in nucleotide free buffers, with four thiol groups exposed, are rapidly denatured, losing the capacity to polymerize within less than one hour. Thus denaturation of monomeric actin must be understood in terms of loss of thiol shielding. In actin preparations generally the ability to polymerize was lost when, even after addition of ATP to solutions of G-actin, the number of thiol groups exposed was greater than two. It was concluded that in monomeric actin changes in the accessibility of thiol groups, loss of nucleotide binding capacity as well as loss of the polymerization capability of the protein are events which probably represent different aspects of the denaturation process in G-actin.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Actins↗

Modification of Lys-237 on actin by 2,4-pentanedione. Alteration of the interaction of actin with tropomyosin.

It has been possible to specifically label rabbit skeletal muscle actin at Lys-237 with 2,4-pentanedione, producing an enamine. This reaction can be reversed with hydroxylamine. The modification can be carried out with actin in either the G- or F-forms and does not affect polymerization-depolymerization. The modification does affect, however, the interaction of tropomyosin (Tm) with the modified F-actin. In the absence of Ca2+ and Mg2+ (mu = 0.12), Tm failed to bind to the modified F-actin whereas it did bind to unmodified F-actin (1 Tm:7 actins). Tm binding could be restored under these conditions by the addition of either troponin (Tn), Mg2+, or Mg2+ and Ca2+. Under certain conditions, Tm alone has been shown to inhibit actin-activated heavy meromyosin (HMM)-Mg2+-ATPase. This inhibition did not occur with the modified F-actin even though Tm was bound (approximately 1 Tm:7 actins). Even when Tn was added to this system (in the absence of Ca2+), no inhibition of ATPase could be observed. Thus, this modification appears to prevent F-actin X Tm from assuming the "blocking" inhibitory position (conformation). In addition, Tn appears to enhance the activation of heavy meromyosin-Mg2+-ATPase by the modified F-actin X Tm complex whether Ca2+ is present or not. This state may be analogous to the potentiated state (Murray, J. M., Knox, M. K., Trueblood, C. E., and Weber, A. (1982) Biochemistry 27, 906-915) seen with myosin subfragment 1-saturated actin at low ATP levels. Thus, using modified and unmodified F-actin, it is possible to produce three Tm X actin states: off (F-actin X Tm), on (modified F-actin X Tm), and "potentiated" (modified F-actin X Tm X Tn).

Actins↗

Actin-filament cross-linking protein T-plastin increases Arp2/3-mediated actin-based movement.

Increasing evidence suggests that actin cross-linking or bundling proteins might not only structure the cortical actin cytoskeleton but also control actin dynamics. Here, we analyse the effects of T-plastin/T-fimbrin, a representative member of an important actin-filament cross-linking protein by combining a quantitative biomimetic motility assay with biochemical and cell-based approaches. Beads coated with the VCA domain of the Wiskott/Aldrich-syndrome protein (WASP) recruit the actin-nucleating Arp2/3 complex, polymerize actin at their surface and undergo movement when placed in cell-free extracts. T-Plastin increased the velocity of VCA beads 1.5 times, stabilized actin comets and concomitantly displaced cofilin, an actin-depolymerizing protein. T-Plastin also decreased the F-actin disassembly rate and inhibited cofilin-mediated depolymerization of actin filaments in vitro. Importantly, a bundling-incompetent variant comprising the first actin-binding domain (ABD1) had similar effects. In cells, this domain induced the formation of long actin cables to which other actin-regulating proteins were recruited. Altogether, these results favor a mechanism in which binding of ABD1 controls actin turnover independently of cross-link formation. In vivo, this activity might contribute to the assembly and maintenance of the actin cytoskeleton of plasma-membrane protrusions.

Actin Cytoskeleton↗

Cap100, a novel phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate-regulated protein that caps actin filaments but does not nucleate actin assembly.

The fast and transient polymerization of actin in nonmuscle cells after stimulation with chemoattractants requires strong nucleation activities but also components that inhibit this process in resting cells. In this paper, we describe the purification and characterization of a new actin-binding protein from Dictyostelium discoideum that exhibited strong F-actin capping activity but did not nucleate actin assembly independently of the Ca2+ concentration. These properties led at physiological salt conditions to an inhibition of actin polymerization at a molar ratio of capping protein to actin below 1:1,000. The protein is a monomer, with a molecular mass of approximately 100 kDa, and is present in growing and in developing amoebae. Based on its F-actin capping function and its apparent molecular weight, we designated this monomeric protein cap100. As shown by dilution-induced depolymerization and by elongation assays, cap100 capped the barbed ends of actin filaments and did not sever F-actin. In agreement with its capping activity, cap100 increased the critical concentration for actin polymerization. In excitation or emission scans of pyrene-labeled G-actin, the fluorescence was increased in the presence of cap100. This suggests a G-actin binding activity for cap100. The capping activity could be completely inhibited by phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2), and bound cap100 could be removed by PIP2. The inhibition by phosphatidylinositol and the Ca(2+)-independent down-regulation of spontaneous actin polymerization indicate that cap100 plays a role in balancing the G- and F-actin pools of a resting cell. In the cytoplasm, the equilibrium would be shifted towards G-actin, but, below the membrane where F-actin is required, this activity would be inhibited by PIP2.

Actin Cytoskeleton↗

Microfilament dynamics: regulation of actin polymerization by actin-fragmin kinase and phosphatases.

Based on the phosphorylation of the purified actin-fragmin complex, an 80 kDa monomeric kinase (AFK) has been isolated from Physarum polycephalum. Protein chemical analysis and studies involving kinase inhibitors and effectors establish that the AFK is a unique kinase that cannot be classified so far in one of the conventional kinase families. The actin-fragmin kinase behaves as an "independent" kinase since its activity towards the actin-fragmin complex is apparently not regulated by the binding of a ligand (e.g., the cyclic-nucleotides, Ca2+, calmodulin, phosphatidylserine and diolein). Rigorous screening of the substrate specificity suggests that the actin-fragmin complex represents the only substrate for this kinase. This kinase phosphorylates the actin moiety of the actin-fragmin complex at two consecutive threonine residues which constitute one of the contact sites for DNase I (37) and which are also located at one of the proposed actin-actin contact sites along the long-pitch helix of F-actin (38, 39). The physiological importance of this phosphorylation was demonstrated by studying the effect of phosphorylation on the nucleation and the capping activity of the actin-fragmin complex using fluorescence enhancement analysis. As could be demonstrated, the nucleation of actin filaments by the actin-fragmin complex is completely abolished upon phosphorylation by the AFK. Phosphorylation of the complex also interferes with its capping activity, which becomes Ca(2+)-dependent. In addition, capping and nucleating activity is regulated in vitro by phosphoinositides, of which PIP2 displays the highest activity and specificity. PIP2 partially inhibits the nucleation and capping activity of the unphosphorylated actin-fragmin. The capping activity of the phosphorylated actin-fragmin complex was inhibited by PIP2 to a much greater extent as compared to the unphosphorylated actin-fragmin complex. Among all phospholipids tested, PIP2 displayed the highest specificity. Initial experiments with purified preparations of the PP-1, PP-2A, PP-2B, alkaline phosphatase and acid phosphatases showed that PP-1 and PP-2A phosphatases were capable of dephosphorylating the phospho actin-fragmin complex. These findings raised the question of whether these or other protein phosphatases were involved in the dephosphorylation of this substrate in vivo. To address this question, Physarum extracts were subjected to fractionation by ion exchange chromatography, and the column fractions were assayed in a variety of conditions, to identify the protein phosphatases involved in the dephosphorylation of this substrate and to identify the elution position of the major Ser/Thr protein phosphatases present in the Physarum extract.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Actin Cytoskeleton↗

Actin--membrane interactions: association of G-actin with the red cell membrane.

Chemically tritiated actin from rabbit skeletal muscle was used to investigate the association of G-actin with the red cell membrane. The tritiated actin was shown to be identical to unmodified actin in its ability to polymerize and to activate heavy meromyosin ATPase. Using sealed and unsealed red cell ghosts we have shown that G-actin binds to the cytoplasmic but not the extracellular membrane surface of ghosts. Inside-out vesicles which have been stripped of endogenous actin and spectrin by low-ionic-strength incubation bind little G-actin. However, when a crude spectrin extract containing primarily spectrin, actin, and band 4.1 is added back to stripped vesicles, subsequent binding of G-actin can be increased up to 40-fold. Further, this crude spectrin extract can compete for and abolish G-actin binding to unsealed ghosts. Actin binding to ghosts increases linearly with added G-actin and requires the presence of magnesium. In addition, actin binding is inhibited by cytochalasin B and DNAase I. Negative staining reveals an abundance of actin filaments formed when G-actin is added to reconstituted inside-out vesicles but none when it is added to unreconstituted vesicles. These observations indicate that added G-actin binds to the red cell membrane via filament formation nucleated by some membrane component at the cytoplasmic surface.

Actins↗