Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Sumatriptan”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,423 records · Page 79Linked to original sources
PubMed2001

Adenosine A(1) receptor-mediated inhibition of protein kinase A-induced calcitonin gene-related peptide release from rat trigeminal neurons.

Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), a potent vasodilator, has been implicated in the pathogenesis of migraine. Its release from adult rat trigeminal neurons in culture was shown to be markedly increased by the activation of adenylate cyclase with forskolin. Modulation of this secretion was investigated by a number of agents with known inhibitory effects on cAMP generation mediated via receptor coupling to G(i/o) proteins. Significantly, forskolin-stimulated CGRP release could be closely correlated with the phosphorylation of the protein kinase A (PKA) substrate cyclic AMP response element-binding protein (CREB). Forskolin-stimulated CGRP release could be potently and effectively inhibited by the adenosine A(1) receptor-selective agonist GR79236X (pIC(50) = 7.7 +/- 0.1, maximal inhibition 65 +/- 2.5% at 300 nM), whereas the A(2A) (CGS21680) and the A(3) (2-chloro-N(6)-(3-iodobenzyl)-adenosine-5'-N-methyluronamide) receptor-selective agonists were without effect. GR79236X-mediated inhibition was abolished by the A(1) receptor antagonist 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine. Immunocytochemical studies and Western analysis revealed the presence of adenosine A(1) receptors on trigeminal neurons. However, despite the additional detection of 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)(1B) receptors on these cells, the clinically effective antimigraine 5-HT(1B/1D) agonist sumatriptan did not inhibit forskolin-stimulated CGRP release nor did it show any effect on the concomitant CREB phosphorylation. In contrast, the mu-opioid agonist fentanyl elicited a 74 +/- 4% reduction in CGRP levels. Forskolin-stimulated CGRP release and CREB phosphorylation could be mimicked by incubation of the cells with chlorophenylthio-cAMP and blocked by pretreatment with the PKA inhibitor myrPKI(14-22). Taken together, the present data confirm the PKA-dependence of forskolin-stimulated CGRP release and suggest that A(1) adenosine agonists may warrant further investigation in models of migraine and neurogenic inflammation.

Adenosine↗
PubMed2003

Assessment of meal induced gastric accommodation by a satiety drinking test in health and in severe functional dyspepsia.

AIMS: Impaired gastric accommodation is a major pathophysiological mechanism in functional dyspepsia. The aim of the present work was to assess a satiety drinking test in the evaluation of accommodation in health and dyspepsia. METHODS: Twenty five controls and 37 severely dyspeptic patients seen at a tertiary care centre completed a dyspepsia questionnaire, and gastric emptying and gastric barostat studies. The amount of liquid meal ingested at maximum satiety during a slow satiety drinking test was determined. In controls, we studied the influence of caloric density and of pharmacological agents that influence accommodation. RESULTS: In patients, satiety scores were higher and maximum satiety occurred at lower calories (542 (50) v 1508 (53) kcal; p<0.0001). Six patients had required nutritional support, but excluding these did not alter the correlations. With increasing severity of early satiety, less calories were ingested at maximum satiety. In multivariate analysis, the amount of calories was significantly correlated to accommodation but not to gastric emptying or sensitivity. Sensitivity and specificity of the satiety test in predicting impaired accommodation reached 92% and 86%, respectively. At different caloric densities, ingested volume rather than caloric load determined maximum satiety. Pharmacological agents (sumatriptan, cisapride, erythromycin) affected the satiety test according to their effect on accommodation. CONCLUSION: A slow caloric drinking test can be used to evaluate accommodation and early satiety. It provides a non-invasive method of predicting impaired accommodation and quantifying pharmacological influences on accommodation.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Influence of different serotonin receptor subtypes on growth hormone secretion.

The role of serotonin (5-HT) in the regulation of growth hormone (GH) secretion remains unclear due to the existence of many different receptors that mediate the 5-HT actions, and the lack of suitable specific agonist and antagonist drugs. In the present work we have taken advantage of the recent development of new selective 5-HT drugs in order to clarify the role played by different 5-HT receptor types and subtypes on GH secretion. The experiments were carried out on beagle dogs. GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) increased basal canine GH (cGH) levels from 0.8 +/- 0.2 to 8.8 +/- 1.7 microg/l at 15 min. Administration of 5-HT(1D) receptor agonist sumatriptan (SUM) induced a cGH peak at 30 min of 12.9 +/- 2.7 microg/l. The combined administration of GHRH plus SUM strikingly potentiated cGH release with a peak of 36.9 +/- 6 microg/l at 30 min (p < 0.05). Pretreatment with the muscarinic receptor antagonist atropine completely abolished the cGH response to SUM, while the cholinergic agonist pyridostigmine (PYR) did not modify this response (15.3 +/- 5 microg/l PYR plus SUM vs. SUM alone 12.9 +/- 2. 7 microg/l). On the other hand, administration of drugs with activity at 5-HT(2A/C) receptors showed a stimulatory role for the 5-HT(2C) receptor subtype, since LY-53857 (antagonist 5-HT(2A/C)) and DOI agonist (5-HT(2A/C)) both modified the GH response stimulated by GHRH (AUC 88.5 +/- 30.4 and 400 +/- 64.6 vs. 267.3 +/- 52.6 respectively), while ketanserin (antagonist 5-HT(2A)) did not modify this response. The 5-HT(3) antagonist ICS-205-930 failed to modify either basal or GHRH induced GH responses. In conclusion, our data show that 5-HT(1D) receptors play a stimulatory role on GH secretion in the dog, possibly by acting through a decrease in hypothalamic somatostatin release. Similarly, the 5-HT(2C) receptor subtypes also appear to play a stimulatory role. However, 5-HT(2A) and 5-HT(3) receptors do not appear to be involved in the control of basal and GHRH-induced GH secretion.

Amphetamines↗
PubMed2001

Involvement of nitric oxide in the regulation of growth hormone secretion in dogs.

Nitric oxide (NO) is a highly reactive gas that has been suggested to function as a neurotransmitter in the neuroendocrine system. In this work, we have evaluated the role of NO pathways in growth hormone (GH) secretion by assessing the effect of L-arginine infusion, a precursor of NO formation, and L-NAME, a nitric oxide synthase (NOS) inhibitor. The experiments were carried out on 7 adult beagle dogs. A saline infusion was carried out on all the dogs as a control test. L-arginine (infusion i.v. 10 g in 100 ml of saline, from t = 0 to 30 min) and L-nitro-arginine-methyl ester, L-NAME (infusion of 300 microg/kg in 120 ml of saline, from t = -30 to 45 min) were administered alone and together with growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) (i.v. bolus at 0 min, at a dose of 100 microg), the synthetic GH secretagogue GHRP-6 (i.v. bolus at 0 min, at a dose of 90 microg), and the 5-HT1D serotonin receptor agonist sumatriptan, SUM (s.c. injection at the dose of 3 mg). Plasma cGH was determined by RIA. Results were evaluated by one-way analysis of variance, followed by the Newman-Keuls test for multiple comparisons. L-arginine administration resulted in a slight increase in plasma cGH in comparison with saline controls. Combined administration of L-arginine and GHRH enhanced cGH release in comparison with GHRH alone. L-NAME alone did not modify baseline cGH levels, but completely suppressed the GH release induced by GHRH or GHRP-6. It also strongly reduced, but did not abolish the effect of the two peptides (GHRH plus GHRP-6) administered together. Finally, administration of the 5-HT1D agonist SUM induced a significant cGH secretion in all dogs, a response which was not modified when L-NAME was administered in combination with SUM. In conclusion, our data show that inhibition of NO blunts both GHRH or GHRP-6-induced cGH release, and are compatible with the hypothesis that it acts by decreasing hypothalamic somatostatin release.

Animals↗
PubMed1994

A review of current treatments for migraine.

Acute drug therapy is the mainstay of treatment for migraine sufferers, with prophylaxis reserved for those with frequent or severe attacks. The majority of treatments have been in use for many years, although their value is often poorly documented due to a lack of well-controlled trials undertaken with defined diagnostic criteria and study end-points. Analgesics with anti-emetics, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and ergot derivatives are used for acute treatment. Recently, the selective 5-HT1 receptor agonist sumatriptan has become available and been shown to have significant benefits over traditional therapies for the acute treatment of migraine. Beta-blockers, flunarizine and 5-HT2 antagonists have been used for prophylaxis, and although many patients report a reduction in attack frequency, breakthrough attacks still occur.

Analgesics↗
PubMed2001

Serotonin-induced hypercontraction through 5-hydroxytryptamine 1B receptors in atherosclerotic rabbit coronary arteries.

BACKGROUND: Augmented vasoconstriction to serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine [5-HT]) in atherosclerotic vessels plays a crucial role in the development of myocardial ischemia. We investigated mechanisms for serotonin-evoked hypercontraction in atherosclerotic rabbit coronary arteries. METHODS AND RESULTS: Contractile responses to serotonergic agents of endothelium-denuded coronary arteries from control and Watanabe heritable hyperlipidemic rabbits (WHHL) were examined. WHHL coronary arteries exhibited hypercontraction to 5-HT(1)-receptor agonists; the constrictor threshold concentrations and E:D(50) to serotonin, 5-carboxamidotryptamine, and sumatriptan in WHHL were significantly lower, and the E:(max) in WHHL to these agents were increased 55% to 59% above those of the control. Serotonin-evoked contractions in both groups were inhibited by GR127935 (5-HT(1B/1D) antagonist; 0.1 to 1 nmol/L) and pertussis toxin but not by ketanserin (5-HT(2) antagonist; 0.01 to 1 micromol/L), suggesting that the hypercontraction is most likely mediated by 5-HT(1B/1D) receptors through a pertussis toxin-sensitive pathway. Furthermore, simultaneous measurements of [Ca(2+)](i) and isometric tension of fura-2-loaded arteries revealed that the hypercontraction was concomitant with the augmented elevation of [Ca(2+)](i) in the smooth muscle. The 5-HT(1B) mRNA levels in WHHL coronary arteries increased to 2.5-fold over those in control arteries, whereas neither 5-HT(1D) nor 5-HT(2A) mRNA was detected in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Atherosclerotic rabbit coronary arteries exhibited the enhancement in contraction and Ca(2+) mobilization in response to serotonin. The 5-HT(1B) receptor, which is upregulated by atherosclerosis, most likely mediates the augmenting effects of serotonin.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Is the 5-HT(1Dbeta) receptor gene implicated in the pathogenesis of obsessive-compulsive disorder?

OBJECTIVE: Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a psychiatric condition for which strong evidence of a genetic component and serotonergic system involvement exists. Recent studies have shown that sumatriptan, a selective ligand of the serotonin (5-HT)(1Dbeta) autoreceptor, modifies OCD symptoms. The aim of this study was to investigate the presence of linkage disequilibrium between the 5-HT(1Dbeta) receptor gene, which has a variant caused by a silent G to C substitution at nucleotide 861 of the coding region, and OCD. METHOD: DNA was collected from 67 probands who met DSM-IV criteria for OCD and from their living parents or siblings. Transmission Disequilibrium Test/sib-Transmission Disequilibrium Test analyses were then conducted with the DNA data. RESULTS: Thirty-two families were informative for the analysis, which showed a preferential transmission of the G allele to the affected subjects. CONCLUSIONS: If the results are confirmed, there may be important implications for the 5-HT(1Dbeta) receptor gene in the pathogenesis and treatment of OCD.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Tolerability profile of zolmitriptan (Zomig; 311C90), a novel dual central and peripherally acting 5HT1B/1D agonist. International clinical experience based on > 3000 subjects treated with zolmitriptan.

Zolmitriptan (Zomig, formerly 311C90) at doses of 0.5-50 mg was administered to 316 unique volunteers in clinical pharmacology studies and 2,750 unique patients in eight clinical studies of acute migraine treatment. Overall, subjects received almost 50,000 doses; 97% of exposures were at doses > or = 2.5 mg. In the clinical pharmacology studies, the overall incidence of subject exposures experiencing at least one adverse event was 52% with zolmitriptan 2.5 mg (28% with placebo). In placebo-controlled studies, the overall incidence of patients with at least one adverse event was dose-dependent for zolmitriptan over the 1-15 mg dose range, e.g. 42% and 46% with 1 and 2.5 mg, respectively and 58% with 5 mg (29% with placebo). Only four serious adverse events attributable to zolmitriptan were reported. In a long-term study, during which 2,058 outpatients treated a total of 31,579 migraine attacks with either one or two zolmitriptan 5 mg doses over a period of up to 1 year, the number of attacks associated with at least one adverse event was similar after one (26%) and two (24%) doses. The majority (59%) of the adverse events reported in this study (59%) occurred within 2 h of dosing, were predominantly mild (59%) or moderate (35%) in intensity, of < or = 4 h duration (58%), required no further action (94%). In placebo-controlled studies, the percentage of patients who reported severe adverse events was similar with zolmitriptan 2.5 mg (4%) and placebo (5%). The most frequently reported adverse events with zolmitriptan in the placebo-controlled clinical studies were asthenia, heaviness (other than chest or neck), dry mouth, nausea, dizziness, somnolence, paresthesia and warm sensations. The type and severity of the adverse events was not influenced by gender (although the frequency of reported adverse events was higher in females, as was the case in the placebo group), age, presence of aura prior to the attack, association of migraine with menstruation, concurrent medication, or by the addition of a second zolmitriptan dose. Zolmitriptan showed a similar tolerability profile in the long-term study, in which a low withdrawal rate due to adverse events of 8% was observed. Zolmitriptan was not associated with an increased frequency of central nervous system-related adverse events in a comparative study of sumatriptan, despite pre-clinical and neurophysiological evidence of a dual peripheral and central action of zolmitriptan. Moreover, zolmitriptan doses of 5-20 mg produced no statistically significant effects on objective assessments of psychometric function. Zolmitriptan had no clinically significant effects on blood pressure (even in patients with controlled mild to moderate hypertension or impaired renal function), ECGs (e.g. there was no evidence of ischemic events) or clinical chemistry, hematological or urinalysis measurements. In summary, zolmitriptan is well tolerated, particularly at the recommended dose of 2.5 mg. Zolmitriptan has a well-defined dose-response with 2.5 mg proving highly effective and optimizing the benefit/risk ratio of treatment. Thus, zolmitriptan is well suited as an acute oral treatment for migraine in the outpatient setting.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2001

Almotriptan: pharmacological differences and clinical results.

In this manuscript we review the key basic and clinical data of almotriptan, the new selective 5-HT(1B/D) agonist developed for the symptomatc treatment of migraine. Among triptans, almotriptan has the highest oral bioavailability, with more than two-thirds of the administered dose absorbed within the first hourboth inside and outside a migraine attack. Gender or the presence of food in the stomach do not influence this pharmacokinetic profile, and its clean metabolism results in no relevant interactions with other medications. The dose exhibiting the best efficacy/ tolerability ratio is 12.5 mg. Efficacy parameters with this dose are very comparable to those of sumatriptan 100 mg, with a recurrence rate in the lower range. The tolerability of almotriptan is similar to that for placebo. The incidence of chest symptoms is very low (<1%), even though this drug remains contraindicated in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy. In summary, almotriptan's promising basic profile together with its excellent tolerability/safety profile and good efficacy confirm this new 5-HT(1B/D) agonist as a drug of choice for the symptomatic treatment of migraine attacks.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1996

Coexistence of migraine and idiopathic intracranial hypertension without papilledema.

Eighty-five patients with refractory transformed migraine type of chronic daily headache (CDH) had spinal tap as a part of diagnostic work-up. Twelve had increased intracranial pressure without papilledema, transient visual obscurations, or visual field defects. The headache profile of these 12 patients was not different from that of transformed migraine type of CDH. Acute headache exacerbations responded to specific antimigraine agents such as ergotamine, dihydroergotamine (DHE), and sumatriptan, whereas prophylactic antimigraine medications were only partially helpful. Addition of agents such as acetazolamide and furosemide, after the diagnosis of increased intracranial pressure, resulted in better control of symptoms. These observations suggest a link between migraine and idiopathic intracranial hypertension that needs further research. In refractory CDH with migrainous features, a spinal tap to exclude coexistent idiopathic intracranial hypertension without papilledema may be indicated.

Acetazolamide↗
PubMed1997

Cognitive processing in primary headache: a study on event-related potentials.

BACKGROUND: There is experimental evidence for loss of cognitive habituation in migraine but not in other types of headache and not by visual event-related potentials (ERP). OBJECTIVE: Determining the latencies (msec) and amplitudes (microV) of ERP components and the differences of these values in a two-trial analysis representing the amount of cognitive habituation. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred thirty-three patients with a headache diagnosis according to the criteria of the International Headache Society: migraine without aura (N = 77); migraine with aura (N = 31); cluster headache during period (N = 26); cluster headache during interval (N = 11); chronic paroxysmal hemicrania (N = 8); episodic tension-type headache (N = 33); ergotamine-induced headache (N = 47). Thirty age-matched healthy subjects served as a control group. METHODS: ERPs were evoked by a visual oddball paradigm consisting of 2 x 200 flashes of light (85% white light; 15% red light). Evaluation of ERP components was done separately for the first 200 and the second 200 stimuli as well as for the entire series of stimuli. RESULTS: We found an acceleration of the P3 latency during the second trial in migraine with and without aura, but not in the other headache types, and not in healthy controls. Ergotamine and sumatriptan abolished this loss of habituation in migraine patients. Increased ERP latencies as compared with healthy controls were present in patients with cluster headache, tension-type headache, ergotamine-induced headache, and migraine with aura, but not in migraine without aura. CONCLUSION: There is a loss of cognitive habituation in migraine, which may serve as a specific but not sensitive diagnostic tool. The pathophysiologies of migraine and cluster headache have a specific modifying property on cognitive processing reflected by a loss of cognitive habituation or an increased cognitive processing time. These effects can, in part, be counterbalanced by antimigraine medication.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

Medication-induced headache: overview and systematic review of therapeutic approaches.

OBJECTIVE: To review medication-induced headache (MIH) through a systematic evaluation of the literature regarding the pharmacologic management of this condition. METHODOLOGY: To identify and evaluate all pharmacologic interventions for MIH, we conducted a qualitative systematic review of the English-language literature from 1966 to June 1998 using MEDLINE. The following search terms were used: chronic daily headache, transformed migraine, analgesic withdrawal headache, analgesic rebound headache, drug-associated headache, medication-induced headache, detoxification, and dihydroergotamine. In addition, a review of the references from relevant literature was also conducted to collect reports not identified in the MEDLINE search. RESULTS: Numerous therapies for acute management of MIH have been evaluated, although no rigorously conducted clinical trials were identified. Therapies evaluated include abrupt withdrawal of analgesics, initiation of dihydroergotamine, nonsteroidal antiinflammatory agents, methylergonovine, dihydroergotamine, sumatriptan, amitriptyline, dexamethasone, piracetam, prothipendyl, and valproate. Epidemiology, diagnosis, clinical features, pathophysiology, and long-term prognosis of therapy are discussed and therapeutic guidelines are offered. CONCLUSIONS: MIH is an underrecognized and difficult condition affecting headache-prone patients. The published literature concerning treatment of patients with MIH is scant and of poor quality, making it difficult for clinicians to decide on appropriate therapy. Recognition and treatment of MIH may lead to a long-term improvement in headache relief for many patients. It appears that complete withdrawal of the medications being overused is required for favorable long-term results.

Amitriptyline↗
PubMed1998

5-HT1Dbeta receptor mediates the supersensitivity of isolated coronary artery to serotonin in variant angina.

Although serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5-HT) is used for provocation of coronary spasm, 5-HT receptor subtypes in spastic coronary arteries remain undetermined. We demonstrated the supersensitivity of isolated coronary artery to ergonovine, 5-HT, and sumatriptan, a 5-HT1D receptor agonist, in a patient with variant angina. Furthermore, we detected gene expression of 5-HT1Dbeta and 5-HT2A receptors in spastic coronary artery using RNase protection assay. These findings suggest that the leftward shift of the dose-response curve for 5-HT, which plays an important role in the pathogenesis of coronary spasm, is mediated by activation of 5-HT1Dbeta receptor.

Angina Pectoris, Variant↗
PubMed2002

Pharmacoeconomic evidence and considerations for triptan treatment of migraine.

The 5-hydroxytriptamine (5-HT)(1B/1D) agonists (i.e., the triptans) are highly effective in migraine but their high cost relative to other treatments necessitates careful analysis of their cost-effectiveness. The majority of pharmacoeconomic evaluations, nearly all of which deal with sumatriptan, indicate that from the societal perspective triptans are dominant: health outcomes are improved while the overall cost of migraine is reduced. However, the results are more ambiguous from the perspective of the health care payer: reductions in non-drug medical costs are unlikely to offset fully the high drug cost. Thus far, few analyses have explicitly included quality of life (QOL) in their analyses and pharmacoeconomic analyses comparing the different triptans are scant. More research is required in these areas.

Cost of Illness↗
PubMed2000

Palatal myoclonus: report of two cases.

We describe two cases of palatal myoclonus (PM), one essential and another secondary to a stroke. Case 1: a 64 years old female who developed clicking sounds in both ears after a stroke and three years later on noticed a progressive involuntary movement of the throat associated with rhythmic contractions of the soft palate, muscles of tongue and throat. MRI showed an ischemic area in brainstem. The patient had a partial response to the use of sumatriptan 6 mg subcutaneously. Case 2: a 66 years old female who began with ear clicking at left ear that worsed slowly associated with tinnitus and arrhythmic movements of soft palate and an audible click at left ear. Brain MRI was normal; audiometry showed bilateral neurosensory loss. She was prescribed clonazepan 1 mg daily with complete recovery. Primary and secondary palatal myoclonus share the same clinical features but probably have different pathophysiological underlying mechanisms.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Tolerability of the triptans: clinical implications.

The triptans represent a relatively new class of compounds effective in the treatment of migraine. The safety and tolerability of these drugs have been extensively investigated since the first triptan (sumatriptan) became commercially available. A report on a very large population of patients tested during clinical trials and in postmarketing studies, confirms that these drugs are safe and well tolerated when correctly used. Adverse events are frequently reported, but are usually mild and only a few patients discontinue therapy because of them. These adverse events include, in particular, the so-called 'triptan symptoms' (tingling, sensation of warmth, etc.). The exact mechanism of chest symptoms reported by 20% of patients with migraine treated with triptans remains unclear, but are exceptionally related to a cardiac mechanism. CNS adverse events (i.e. somnolence) are also reported, but it is a matter of debate whether they are related to the pharmacological properties (i.e. lipophilicity) of the drug or are symptoms of the disease itself. The potential risk for drug overuse must be taken into account when the triptans are given to patients with a high frequency of migraine attacks. Clinical interaction of triptans with other drugs metabolised in the liver may theoretically influence the incidence of adverse events, but there is little evidence to support this assumption. There is no evidence of a teratogenic risk of triptans in pregnant women taking these drugs.

Brain↗
PubMed2004

Pharmacokinetic interactions of topiramate.

Topiramate is a new antiepileptic drug (AED) that has been approved worldwide (in more than 80 countries) for the treatment of various kinds of epilepsy. It is currently being evaluated for its effect in various neurological and psychiatric disorders. The pharmacokinetics of topiramate are characterised by linear pharmacokinetics over the dose range 100-800 mg, low oral clearance (22-36 mL/min), which, in monotherapy, is predominantly through renal excretion (renal clearance 10-20 mL/min), and a long half-life (19-25 hours), which is reduced when coadministered with inducing AEDs such as phenytoin, phenobarbital and carbamazepine. The absolute bioavailability, or oral availability, of topiramate is 81-95% and is not affected by food. Although topiramate is not extensively metabolised when administered in monotherapy (fraction metabolised approximately 20%), its metabolism is induced during polytherapy with carbamazepine and phenytoin, and, consequently, its fraction metabolised increases. During concomitant treatment with topiramate and carbamazepine or phenytoin, the (oral) clearance of topiramate increases 2-fold and its half-life becomes shorter by approximately 50%, which may require topiramate dosage adjustment when phenytoin or carbamazepine therapy is added or discontinued. From a pharmacokinetic standpoint, topiramate is a unique example of a drug that, because of its major renal elimination component, is not subject to drug interaction due to enzyme inhibition, but nevertheless is susceptible to clinically relevant drug interactions due to induction of its metabolism. Unlike old AEDs such as phenytoin and carbamazepine, topiramate is a mild inducer and, currently, the only interaction observed as a result of induction by topiramate is that with ethinylestradiol. Topiramate only increases the oral clearance of ethinylestradiol in an oral contraceptive at high dosages (>200 mg/day). Because of this dose-dependency, possible interactions between topiramate and oral contraceptives should be assessed according to the topiramate dosage utilised. This paper provides a critical review of the pharmacokinetic interactions of topiramate with old and new AEDs, an oral contraceptive, and the CNS-active drugs lithium, haloperidol, amitriptyline, risperidone, sumatriptan, propranolol and dihydroergotamine. At a daily dosage of 200 mg, topiramate exhibited no or little (with lithium, propranolol and the amitriptyline metabolite nortriptyline) pharmacokinetic interactions with these drugs. The results of many of these drug interaction studies with topiramate have not been published before, and are presented and discussed for the first time in this article.

Anticonvulsants↗
PubMed2005

Oral serotonin receptor agonists: a review of their cost effectiveness in migraine.

Migraine headache is a highly prevalent chronic, episodic condition. The direct and indirect costs of migraine headache have a tremendous economic impact in the US. Research has shown that serotonin (5HT(1B/D)) receptor agonists reduce healthcare costs, improve health-related QOL (HR-QOL), decrease migraine disability and keep patients effective in the workplace. The purpose of this manuscript is to examine the cost effectiveness of oral 5HT(1B/D) receptor agonists for the treatment of migraine headache. In general, 5HT(1B/D) receptor agonists are associated with increases in direct healthcare costs; however, they are also associated with reductions in the indirect costs associated with migraine headache. Therefore, it appears that the relatively high acquisition cost of these medications is offset and, as a class, these medications appear to be cost effective and demonstrate net benefits from the societal perspective. Based on meta-analyses in which data on eletriptan were not available, it appears that within the class, almotriptan and rizatriptan are the most cost effective. In a prospective study comparing eletriptan with sumatriptan, it appears that the former may be more cost effective than the latter. Additional investigations are needed to further explore the application of the friction-cost approach and QALYs to cost-effectiveness analyses of this class of medication.

Cost-Benefit Analysis↗