Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “PLACEBOS”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,423 records · Page 79Linked to original sources
PubMed2000

Placebo effect in randomized, controlled studies of acute bipolar mania and depression.

Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group clinical trials have been the standard methodology for establishing the efficacy of new treatments for patients with bipolar disorder in manic, mixed, or depressive episodes. We examine the placebo response rate in acute treatment trials of acute mania (and mixed states) and bipolar depression. Also addressed are potential variables associated with placebo response, strategies to minimize placebo response, the optimum duration of placebo-controlled acute treatment trials, possible alternatives to the use of placebo, and the ramifications of these issues with regard to the design of studies in children, adolescents, and older adults with bipolar disorder.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2000

The use of placebo control groups in the assessment of psychiatric drugs: an historical context.

The reliable evaluation of treatments intended for the management of psychiatric illness would not be possible without the use of placebo. Other types of control groups can provide useful information, but none are capable of adducing a finding as compelling and unambiguously interpretable as a statistically significant drug-placebo difference. Its epistemological advantage notwithstanding, the ethicality of employing a placebo control group has been increasingly challenged in recent years. Many who object to the use of placebo on ethical grounds assume, incorrectly, that there are fungible alternatives to the use of placebo in the assessment of psychotropic drugs. This essay attempts to explain, within an historical context, not only why placebo is irreplaceable, but why it is often so difficult to communicate its advantages to those unfamiliar with the epistemological aims and methods of controlled clinical trials.

Antipsychotic Agents↗
PubMed1999

Use of placebo controls in an oral contraceptive trial: methodological issues and adverse event incidence.

Two multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies were conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of triphasic norgestimate/ethinyl estradiol (Ortho Tri-Cyclen) for the treatment of acne vulgaris. To our knowledge, these studies were the first double-blind, placebo-controlled trials to evaluate the efficacy of an oral contraceptive (OC) in the treatment of acne; in fact, they are probably the first placebo-controlled trials ever completed using modern OC. This article examines the conduct and feasibility of these studies including discussions on study planning enrollment, maintenance of the blind, continuation rates, and pregnancy prevention. Subjects were between the ages of 15 and 49 years, with moderate acne vulgaris, no contraindications to oral contraceptive use, and were willing to use a nonsteroidal method of birth control during the 6 months of the trial. More than 500 participants were enrolled in 1 year. Discontinuation rates between groups were similar. To explore the reasons for the similar and low discontinuation rates, OC-related side effects were evaluated in comparison to placebo. This analysis revealed that the OC exhibited a side effect profile that was similar, in many cases, to that of placebo. Although pregnancies occurred in the placebo arm, the incidence was consistent with expected failure rates for users of nonsteroidal methods in the general population.

Acne Vulgaris↗
PubMed1990

A blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial to compare theophylline and doxapram for the treatment of apnea of prematurity.

A blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of theophylline and doxapram therapy in 31 infants with significant apnea of prematurity. Of 10 infants, two had a short-term response to placebo, 8 of 10 infants to theophylline, and 7 of 11 infants to doxapram (placebo vs treatment with theophylline or doxapram: p = 0.01). The two infants who initially responded to placebo remained responsive for the duration of the study. Of the eight infants in whom treatment with placebo failed, five were randomly assigned to receive theophylline, for a total of 15 infants treated with theophylline, and two of the eight were randomly assigned to receive doxapram, for a total of 13 infants treated with doxapram; the remaining infant required tracheal intubation. Of the 15 infants randomly assigned to receive theophylline, seven responded for the duration of the study; of the eight infants who did not respond to treatment with theophylline, five responded to doxapram, one responded to a combination of theophylline and doxapram, and two remained resistant to treatment. Of the 13 infants randomly assigned to receive doxapram four responded for the duration of the study; of the nine who did not respond to doxapram, seven responded to theophylline, one responded to a combination of theophylline and doxapram, and one remained resistant to treatment. This study demonstrates that although therapy with theophylline or doxapram is associated with a significant short-term reduction in the incidence of apnea compared with that in placebo-treated infants, the long-term response to treatment is frequently incomplete and is not sustained more than 1 week.

Apnea↗
PubMed2006

Baseline factors as predictors of clinical progression of benign prostatic hyperplasia in men treated with placebo.

PURPOSE: We analyzed data from the placebo arm of the MTOPS trial to determine clinical predictors of BPH progression. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 3,047 patients with LUTS were randomized to either placebo, doxazosin (4 to 8 mg), finasteride (5 mg), or a combination of doxazosin and finasteride. Average length of followup was 4.5 years. The primary outcome was time to overall clinical progression of BPH, defined as either a confirmed 4-point or greater increase in AUA SS, acute urinary retention, incontinence, renal insufficiency, or recurrent urinary tract infection. We analyzed BPH progression event data from the 737 men who were randomized to placebo. RESULTS: The rate of overall clinical progression of BPH events in the placebo group was 4.5 per 100 person-years, for a cumulative incidence (among men who had at least 4 years of followup data) of 17%. The risk of BPH progression was significantly greater in patients on placebo with a baseline TPV of 31 ml or greater vs less than 31 ml (p <0.0001), a baseline PSA of 1.6 ng/dl or greater vs PSA less than 1.6 ng/dl (p = 0.0009), a baseline Qmax of less than 10.6 ml per second vs 10.6 ml per second or greater (p = 0.011), a baseline PVR of 39 ml or greater vs less than 39 ml (p = 0.0008) and baseline age 62 years or older vs younger than 62 years (p = 0.0002). CONCLUSIONS: Among men in the placebo arm, baseline TPV, PSA, Qmax, PVR and age were important predictors of the risk of clinical progression of BPH.

Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists↗
PubMed2005

Limitations of using outcomes in the placebo arm of a clinical trial of benign prostatic hyperplasia to quantify those in the community.

OBJECTIVES: To quantify potential biases that may occur when placebo arms of clinical trials are used to characterize the natural history of disease and to compare incidence rates of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) outcomes in community-dwelling men with outcomes in the placebo arm of a clinical trial of BPH. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: White men aged 50 years or older at baseline were selected randomly from the Olmsted County, Minnesota, community in 1990 and were monitored biennially through 1996 for urologic outcomes. Symptom progression, acute urinary retention, and minimally Invasive or surgical treatment of BPH were assessed from a validated questionnaire and a review of community medical records. Findings from the Olmsted County Study (N=1193) and a selected subcohort (n=238) were compared with those from the placebo arm of the Medical Therapy of Prostatic Symptoms trial (N=737). RESULTS: During more than 5088 person-years of follow-up (mean, 4.9 years) In the Olmsted County Study, Incidence rates per 1000 person-years were 8.5 (95% confidence Interval [CI], 6.4-11.2) for acute urinary retention, 97.1 (95% CI, 88.7-106.0) for symptom progression, 6.6 (95% CI, 4.8-9.0) for surgery or minimally invasive treatment, and 105.1 (95% CI, 96.4-114.4) for any outcomes for all men. For those meeting trial Inclusion criteria (selected subcohort, n=238), Incidence rates were 18.3, 86.5, 16.8, and 109.4, respectively. By comparison, Incidence rates per 1000 person-years for the placebo arm of the Medical Therapy of Prostatic Symptoms clinical trial for BPH (mean follow-up, 4.5 years) were 6 for acute urinary retention, 36 for symptom progression, and 45 for any outcome, but the estimate of 13 for surgery or minimally invasive treatment was higher than for men in the Olmsted County Study. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with community-dwelling men, men in the placebo arm of this clinical trial of BPH treatments had a substantially lower risk of BPH-related outcomes. Extrapolation of findings from the placebo arm of clinical trials to describe the natural history of disease in community-dwelling men should be done with caution and appropriate recognition of limitations.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

A multicenter trial of nedocromil sodium, 1% nasal solution, compared with cromolyn sodium and placebo in ragweed seasonal allergic rhinitis.

This study was a double-blind, parallel-group study to evaluate a new medication, nedocromil sodium, 1%, in comparison with placebo and cromolyn sodium, 4%, for treatment of ragweed seasonal allergic rhinitis. Two hundred thirty-three patients (aged 12 to 65 years) from eight centers were randomized to treatment, one spray per nostril, four times daily, with nedocromil sodium, cromolyn sodium, or matched placebo (80, 76, and 77 patients, respectively). All patients had at least a 2-year history of ragweed seasonal allergic rhinitis. Treatment was for 8 weeks during the ragweed season, and daily pollen counts were used to identify the peak 3-week period. Clinic examinations were made before and after the 1-week baseline and after 1, 3, 5, and 8 weeks of treatment. Rhinitis symptoms were recorded each day by the patients. Nedocromil sodium was more effective than placebo (p less than 0.05) in relieving symptoms as recorded by the patients. Cromolyn sodium was also more effective than placebo, but the difference was not usually significant. Similarly, the active treatments were both better than placebo for clinical parameters measured at visits and for global opinions of treatment, and more rescue therapy was used by the placebo-treated group. There was no significant difference between the two active treatments, but the trend throughout was in favor of nedocromil sodium. Our findings demonstrated nedocromil sodium to be at least as effective as an established therapy (cromolyn sodium) in reducing symptoms of rhinitis during the peak ragweed pollen season.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1996

Comparative outdoor study of the efficacy, onset and duration of action, and safety of cetirizine, loratadine, and placebo for seasonal allergic rhinitis.

BACKGROUND: Cetirizine, a new once-daily highly specific H1-antagonist, has been shown in conventional studies to be efficacious in the treatment of seasonal and perennial allergic rhinitis and chronic idiopathic urticaria. OBJECTIVE: The efficacy, duration and onset of action, and safety of cetirizine, 10 mg once daily, was compared with that of loratadine, 10 mg once daily, and placebo in a field study of patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis. METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, parallel, double-dummy study conducted over 2 days in spring allergy season at outdoor parks in San Diego and Iowa City. Study medication was administered at 10:00 AM on both days. After screening, eligible patients completed rhinitis symptom diaries in the park hourly from 7:30 to 9:30 AM (baseline); at 10:30 AM and hourly from 11:00 AM to 4:00 PM (period I); at 6:00, 8:00, and 10:00 PM at home (period II); and the next day in the park hourly from 8:00 to 10:00 AM (period III), and from 11:00 AM to 4:00 PM (period IV). Major and total symptom complex scores, global efficacy and overall satisfaction, and adverse events were assessed. RESULTS: Of the 279 patients (140 men and 139 women; mean age, 29 years) randomized to treatment, 278 were included in the efficacy analysis. Cetirizine produced significantly greater mean reductions than loratadine or placebo in major symptom complex severity scores at all periods (p < or = 0.05), except period I for placebo. Cetirizine also produced mean reductions in total symptom complex severity scores that were superior to loratadine at every evaluation period (p < 0.05) and were statistically different from placebo at period II (p < 0.01). A rapid onset of action was observed with cetirizine, as was a better response pattern in the patient global assessment of efficacy compared with loratadine. Study medications were well tolerated; no patient stopped treatment because of side effects. The incidence of somnolence with cetirizine was 13% versus 2% with placebo (p < 0.05); headache occurred more frequently with loratadine (23%) than with cetirizine (11%, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Cetirizine relieved rhinitis symptoms more effectively and quickly than loratadine and placebo in this field study of seasonal allergic rhinitis. Both active agents were generally well tolerated.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

Efficacy and safety of leflunomide compared with placebo and sulphasalazine in active rheumatoid arthritis: a double-blind, randomised, multicentre trial. European Leflunomide Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Phase II trials of leflunomide, an inhibitor of de-novo pyrimidine synthesis, have shown efficacy in rheumatoid arthritis. This double-blind randomised trial compared leflunomide with placebo and sulphasalazine in active rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: 358 patients were randomly assigned leflunomide (100 mg daily on days 1-3, then 20 mg daily), placebo, or sulphasalazine (0.5 g daily, titrated progressively to 2.0 g daily at week 4). The primary endpoints were tender and swollen joint counts and investigator's and patient's overall assessments. Analyses were by intention to treat. FINDINGS: The mean changes in the leflunomide, placebo, and sulphasalazine groups were -9.7, -4.3, and -8.1 for tender joint count; -7.2, -3.4, and -6.2 for swollen joint count; -1.1, -0.3, and -1.0 for physician's overall assessment; and -1.1, -0.4, and -1.1 for patient's overall assessment. Leflunomide and sulphasalazine were significantly superior to placebo (p=0.0001 for joint counts; p<0.001 for assessments). Radiographic disease progression was significantly slower with leflunomide and sulphasalazine than with placebo (p<0.01). Most common adverse events with leflunomide were diarrhoea (17%), nausea (10%), alopecia (8%), and rash (10%). Transiently abnormal liver function was seen in three leflunomide-group patients and five sulphasalazine-group patients. There were two cases of reversible agranulocytosis in the sulphasalazine group. INTERPRETATION: Leflunomide was more effective than placebo in treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and showed similar efficacy to sulphasalazine. Leflunomide was well tolerated. This drug may be a useful option as a disease-modifying antirheumatic drug.

Algorithms↗
PubMed1999

Infliximab (chimeric anti-tumour necrosis factor alpha monoclonal antibody) versus placebo in rheumatoid arthritis patients receiving concomitant methotrexate: a randomised phase III trial. ATTRACT Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Not all patients with rheumatoid arthritis can tolerate or respond to methotrexate, a standard treatment for this disease. There is evidence that antitumour necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) is efficacious in relief of signs and symptoms. We therefore investigated whether infliximab, a chimeric human-mouse anti-TNFalpha monoclonal antibody would provide additional clinical benefit to patients who had active rheumatoid arthritis despite receiving methotrexate. METHODS: In an international double-blind placebo-controlled phase III clinical trial, 428 patients who had active rheumatoid arthritis, who had received continuous methotrexate for at least 3 months and at a stable dose for at least 4 weeks, were randomised to placebo (n=88) or one of four regimens of infliximab at weeks 0, 2, and 6. Additional infusions of the same dose were given every 4 or 8 weeks thereafter on a background of a stable dose of methotrexate (median 15 mg/week for > or =6 months, range 10-35 mg/wk). Patients were assessed every 4 weeks for 30 weeks. FINDINGS: At 30 weeks, the American College of Rheumatology (20) response criteria, representing a 20% improvement from baseline, were achieved in 53, 50, 58, and 52% of patients receiving 3 mg/kg every 4 or 8 weeks or 10 mg/kg every 4 or 8 weeks, respectively, compared with 20% of patients receiving placebo plus methotrexate (p<0.001 for each of the four infliximab regimens vs placebo). A 50% improvement was achieved in 29, 27, 26, and 31% of infliximab plus methotrexate in the same treatment groups, compared with 5% of patients on placebo plus methotrexate (p<0.001). Infliximab was well-tolerated; withdrawals for adverse events as well as the occurrence of serious adverse events or serious infections did not exceed those in the placebo group. INTERPRETATION: During 30 weeks, treatment with infliximab plus methotrexate was more efficacious than methotrexate alone in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis not previously responding to methotrexate.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Pioglitazone hydrochloride in combination with metformin in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized, placebo-controlled study. The Pioglitazone 027 Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Their complimentary mechanisms of action suggest that a combination of pioglitazone hydrochloride and metformin may have clinically beneficial effects in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes. OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to assess the efficacy and tolerability of pioglitazone in combination with metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: This was a 16-week, double-blind study with the option of enrollment in a separate open-ended, open-label study. It included patients with poorly controlled diabetes mellitus (glycated hemoglobin [HbA1c] > or =8.0%, fasting C-peptide >1.0 ng/mL) who had been receiving a stable regimen of metformin for > or =30 days. Patients with diabetic retinopathy, nephropathy, or neuropathy; impaired liver or kidney function; or unstable cardiovascular or cerebrovascular conditions were excluded. Patients were randomized to receive once-daily pioglitazone 30 mg + metformin or placebo + metformin. Patients in the open-label extension received pioglitazone 30 mg (with optional titration to 45 mg) + metformin. RESULTS: Three hundred twenty-eight patients were randomized to treatment (168 pioglitazone + metformin, 160 placebo + metformin), and 249 completed the study. Of these, 154 elected to enter the open-label extension study. Patients' mean age was 56 years; most (84%) were white and slightly more than half (57%) were male. Patients receiving piogli- tazone 30 mg + metformin had statistically significant mean decreases in HbA1c (-0.83%) and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels (-37.7 mg/dL) compared with placebo + metformin (P < or = 0.05). Decreases in FPG levels occurred as early as the fourth week of therapy, the first time point at which FPG was measured. The pioglitazone + metformin group had significant mean percentage changes in levels of triglycerides (-18.2%) and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (+8.7%) compared with placebo + metformin (P < or = 0.05). Mean percentage increases were noted in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (7.7%, pioglitazone + metformin; 11.9%, placebo + metformin) and total cholesterol (4.1%, pioglitazone + metformin; 1.1%, placebo + metformin), with no significant differences between groups. In the extension study, patients treated with open-label pioglitazone + metformin for 72 weeks had mean changes from baseline of -1.36% in HbA1c and -63.0 mg/dL in FPG. The incidence of adverse events was similar in both groups. Throughout the study, no patient in either treatment group had an alanine aminotransferase (ALT) value > or =3 times the upper limit of normal, a commonly used marker of potential liver damage. Thus, no evidence of drug-induced hepatotoxicity or drug-induced elevations in serum ALT was observed. CONCLUSIONS: In this study in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, pioglitazone + metformin significantly improved HbA1c and FPG levels, with positive effects on serum lipid levels and no evidence of drug-induced hepatotoxicity. These effects were maintained for >1.5 years, including the open-label extension.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Primary prevention of acute respiratory tract infections in children using a bacterial immunostimulant: a double-masked, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Acute respiratory tract infections (ARTIs) are among the main causes of morbidity and mortality in children. The bacterial extract OM-85 BV has shown some protective effect for ARTIs in preschool children and a reduction in exacerbations of chronic bronchitis in adults. OBJECTIVES: This trial reports results of a double-masked, placebo-controlled, parallel-group clinical study that assessed the efficacy and tolerability of OM-85 BV in the prevention of ARTIs in school girls living in an orphanage. METHODS: Two hundred girls (age range, 6 to 13 years) living in an orphanage entered the trial. Participants were randomly allocated to receive either OM-85 BV or placebo for 10 consecutive days a month for 3 consecutive months. Patients were followed up for 6 months, including the administration period. The trial began in September 1996 and finished in March 1997. Primary end points were the type and number of infections. Secondary end points included when an infection occurred, time to clinical cure, severity of infection, absenteeism from school due to an ARTI, number of antibiotics or other drugs prescribed, and duration of concomitant drug treatment. RESULTS: During the trial, patients in the OM-85 BV group experienced 143 ARTIs (135 upper ARTIs and 8 otitis episodes) and patients in the placebo group experienced 299 ARTIs (273 upper ARTIs, 1 lower ARTI, and 25 otitis episodes). The median number of ARTIs was 1.0 (0.0, 3.0; 5th percentile, 95th percentile) in the OM-85 BV group compared with 3.0 (2.0, 4.0; 5th percentile, 95th percentile) in the placebo group. This difference was statistically significant (P < 0.001). Participants who received OM-85 BV also showed significantly better results (P < 0.001) than participants who received placebo in terms of median duration of illness, median number of missed school days due to an ARTI, median number of antibiotic and drug courses, and median duration of concomitant treatment. There were significant differences (P < 0.05) in severity of ARTIs during month 4 of the trial, with patients receiving OM-85 BV showing less severe ARTIs than patients receiving placebo and shorter mean time to clinical cure from the second month to the fourth month. No adverse events related to the trial medications were reported. CONCLUSIONS: OM-85 BV had a preventive effect on ARTIs in the school girls, with a reduction in the antibiotic requirements and the duration of ARTIs. Future studies are needed to further explore the role of OM-85 BV in the prevention of ARTIs.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2000

Efficacy and safety of acarbose add-on therapy in the treatment of overweight patients with Type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

This 6-month, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, parallel-group study investigated the potential of acarbose add-on therapy for improving the glycaemic control of overweight patients with Type 2 diabetes and was inadequately controlled with metformin monotherapy. Patients were randomised to receive acarbose titrated up to 100 mg three times daily (n=74) or placebo (n=78). All patients were receiving metformin 850 mg twice or thrice daily before the study and continued to receive this dose throughout the study. The mean difference in glycated haemoglobin (HbA(1c)) (+/-S.D.) from baseline to endpoint was -0.7+/-1.2% U in the acarbose intention-to-treat (ITT) group, compared with +0.2+/-1.3% in the placebo ITT group (P=0.0001). Significantly, more patients in the acarbose group were classified as 'responders', with an HbA(1c) at the end of treatment of less than 7.0% or a decrease by at least 15% relative to baseline (acarbose vs. placebo; 42 vs. 17%; P=0.002). The difference in fasting blood glucose level from baseline to endpoint was -1.0+/-2.8 (S.D.) mmol/l in the acarbose ITT group, compared with +1.3+/-2.8 mmol/l in the placebo ITT group (P=0.0001), and for 2-h postprandial blood glucose level -1.4+/-3.8 vs. +1.1+/-3.5 mmol/l (P=0.0001). In all, 60% of patients in the acarbose group and 33% in the placebo group had an adverse event considered to be possibly or probably related to drug therapy, leading to withdrawal by 15 and 3%, respectively. The results indicate that acarbose has potential clinical utility for improving glycaemic control in overweight patients with Type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin.

Acarbose↗
PubMed1996

A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled evaluation of short-term treatment with oral itraconazole in patients with tinea versicolor.

BACKGROUND: The use of short-term oral azoles is an alternative to topical therapy in patients with tinea versicolor. OBJECTIVE: We compared the efficacy and safety of oral itraconazole with that of placebo in 36 patients with mycologically proven tinea versicolor. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to 7 days of treatment with either itraconazole, 200 mg once daily, or placebo. A potassium hydroxide examination and assessment of scaling, erythema, pruritus, and global condition were performed at baseline and at 4 weeks after treatment. RESULTS: The itraconazole-treated group demonstrated significant improvement over both baseline (p < 0.01) and placebo (p < 0.02) in scaling, erythema, and pruritus. Sixty-seven percent of itraconazole-treated patients were free of symptoms at week 5, as compared with 12% of placebo-treated patients. Ninety-four percent of itraconazole-treated patients were considered to be healed or markedly improved at the study's end point compared with 6% of placebo-treated patients (p < 0.01). A total of 89% in the itraconazole-treated group had a negative potassium hydroxide examination at the follow-up visit compared with 6% in the placebo-treated group (p < 0.01). There was a single report of a possibly treatment-related adverse event in each treatment group. CONCLUSION: Short-term treatment with itraconazole is effective and well tolerated in the management of tinea versicolor.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1996

Cimetidine therapy for warts: a placebo-controlled, double-blind study.

BACKGROUND: Cimetidine, an H2-receptor antagonist, has been used successfully to treat patients with mucocutaneous candidiasis, common variable immunodeficiency, herpes simplex, and herpes zoster because of its immunomodulatory effects. Recently, some trials have suggested that cimetidine may also be useful for the treatment of warts. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to determine whether cimetidine is effective in the treatment of warts. METHODS: Seventy patients with multiple warts were included in a placebo-controlled, double-blind study. Patients were randomly allocated to treatment groups equally. The groups received cimetidine, 25 to 40 mg/kg daily, or placebo for 3 months. Patients were examined at monthly intervals. RESULTS: At the end of the therapy, 28 cimetidine-treated and 26 placebo-treated patients were examined to determine the efficacy of treatment. Cure rates obtained were 32% (9 of 28) in the cimetidine-treated group and 30.7% (8 of 26) in the placebo-treated group. No significant difference was found between cimetidine and placebo in effectiveness (p = 0.85). CONCLUSION: Our results show that cimetidine is no more effective than placebo in the treatment of patients with common warts.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Improving credibility of instructions in the balanced placebo design: a misattribution manipulation.

Research using the balanced placebo design seeks to differentiate the physiological and psychological effects of drinking alcohol. Questions regarding the validity of the design center about experimenter instructions, particularly in the antiplacebo cell at higher blood alcohol content (BAC) levels. This study tested the plausibility of two misattribution strategies designed to reduce the conflict between experimenter instructions and internal cues of drunkenness. Forty-two participants (BAC = .055) were told that they received no alcohol, with internal cues of drunkenness said to be produced by a (sham) second drug, a (placebo) tachistoscopic display, or no misattribution given. The placebo drug group reported less alcohol intoxication without reporting less physical impairment than the control or tachistoscopic groups. Doubt of instructions was expressed more frequently in the control group than in the placebo drug group. Mean time to first reported doubt of experimenter instructions was longer for the placebo drug group. A manipulation check designed to account for demand effects indicated that instituting the pharmacologic misattribution increased the success of the manipulation over the control group. Providing a credible attribution for internal symptoms of drunkenness makes experimenter's instructions more credible, improving the validity of the antiplacebo cell of the balanced placebo design.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Amlodipine versus chlorthalidone versus placebo in the treatment of stage I isolated systolic hypertension.

The study was to compare the effects of amlodipine (calcium channel antagonist), chlorthalidone (diuretic), and placebo in adults more than 50 years of age with stage 1 isolated systolic hypertension (ISH). After a 4-week placebo run-in phase, 150 patients were randomly assigned in a double-blind fashion to treatment with 5 mg of amlodipine (n = 48), 15 mg of chlorthalidone (n = 50), or placebo (n = 52). Patients who failed to meet the systolic blood pressure (BP) reduction goal by week 4 had their dose increased to 10 mg of amlodipine or 30 mg of chlorthalidone, and maintained at this increased dose for 12 weeks. Results showed a mean reduction (mean +/- SD) in sitting systolic BP from baseline to the last treatment visit of -14.6+/-12.2 mm Hg (95% confidence interval [CI] -18.2, -11.0), -14.0+/-13.46 mm Hg (95% CI -17.8, -10.2), and -3.4+/-11.83 mm Hg (95% CI -6.7, -0.1) for the amlodipine, chlorthalidone, and the placebo treatment groups, respectively. Both active treatments showed significantly greater reductions than the placebo group (P < or = .001), but were not significantly different from each other. Sixty-seven percent of the amlodipine, 69% of the chlorthalidone, and 25% of the placebo-treated patients reached the protocol defined systolic BP goal (P = .001). Both active treatment groups showed a trend of better systolic BP response in older patients (> or =65 years). Secondary efficacy measures including pulse pressure, standing systolic, diastolic, and the 24-h ambulatory BP were also statistically significantly improved for both active treatments at the end of treatment, except for chlorthalidone in standing diastolic BP. Adverse events that occurred during the study were as expected and were well tolerated. The results of this study support the efficacy and safety of amlodipine and chlorthalidone for the treatment of stage 1 ISH during 20 weeks of treatment.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

Short-term vitamin E supplementation before marathon running: a placebo-controlled trial.

Gastrointestinal complaints and occult bleeding have been commonly described in marathon runners. We hypothesized that these complaints may arise from intestinal ischemia caused by the shunting of blood away from the splanchnic circulation during endurance racing followed by reperfusion injury. Studies in animal models have suggested prophylactic vitamin E supplementation may prevent this type of injury. We sought to determine if prerace vitamin E supplementation would prevent intestinal ischemia/reperfusion injury in humans. Forty subjects who planned to complete the 1996 Houston-Tennaco Marathon were randomized to receive vitamin E (1000 IU daily) or placebo (soya lecithin) for 2 wk before the race in a double-blinded trial. Inclusion criteria included no use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) within 24 d of the race or vitamin or mineral supplements containing vitamins C or E or selenium within 30 d of the race. Subjects were studied 2 wk before the race and immediately following the race. Blood was obtained for serum vitamin E and total lipid and salicylate concentrations. A solution of lactulose (5 g) and mannitol (2 g) was consumed and urine was collected for 6 h. Aliquots were assayed for lactulose and mannitol concentration. Stool samples were tested for occult blood and following the race subjects rated their nausea, abdominal pain, and cramping on a 1-5 scale. Twenty-six subjects (24 male, 2 female) completed the marathon. Finish times ranged between 2 h 43 min and 5 h 28 min. All subjects had heme-negative stool prerace and four developed heme-positive stool postrace, with no difference between vitamin E and placebo groups (Fisher's exact = 0.63). All had non-detectable salicylate concentrations pre- and postrace. Serum vitamin E concentration increased in botPP = 0.02 in the vitamin E group and 1.45 +/- 0.40 to 1.66 +/- 0.48 mg/dL in the placebo group, P = 0.02). However, the serum vitamin E: total lipid ratio increased significantly in the vitamin E-supplemented group (0.0022 +/- 0.0002 to 0.0051 +/- 0.0015, P = 0.02), but not in the placebo group (P = 0.25). Overall, the urinary lactulose:mannitol ratio increased from 0.03 +/- 0.02 to 0.06 +/- 0.08 postrace (P = 0.06) without difference between vitamin E or placebo groups. Intestinal permeability increased significantly more in those who developed occult bleeding. More subjects in the placebo group developed abdominal cramping (Fisher's exact = 0.04) and abdominal pain (Fisher's exact = 0.06), although there was no difference in severity between groups. There was no difference in the incidence of nausea and no diarrhea was reported by any subject. Intestinal permeability tends to increase and occult gastrointestinal bleeding occurs during endurance running, suggesting the occurrence of intestinal ischemia/reperfusion injury. Prerace supplementation with the antioxidant vitamin E had no effect on performance, intestinal injury, occult bleeding, or the severity of postrace gastrointestinal complaints. Vitamin E supplementation was associated with a decreased incidence of these complaints but had no effect on their severity.

Abdominal Pain↗