Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Motion Perception”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,423 records · Page 79Linked to original sources
PubMed2005

Neurons in monkey visual cortex detect lines defined by coherent motion of dots.

Form perception from coherent motion is an important aspect of vision. Representations of one-, two- and three-dimensional forms have been found at various stages of cortical processing using random-dot stimuli, whereas representations of biological objects like a walking human being concentrate at higher stages of processing. The perception of biological objects can be induced by sparse dot stimuli that consist of a few dots that mark the joints of the human body [G. Johansson (1973) Percept. Psychophys., 14, 201-211]. In the present study, we aimed to investigate whether neurons in early visual areas that respond to bars and edges defined by luminance contrast also signal bar-like objects from sparse dot stimuli. We studied single neurons with rows of 3-24 dots that were either collinear or scattered within a rectangular form. These dots were moved coherently on a uniform or dotted background, and human observers perceived them as rigid rods or other bar-like objects. We found neurons in the visual cortex of the awake, behaving monkey that responded to these stimuli and were sensitive to the orientation of these objects as for conventional bars or edges. Stimulus conditions that failed to induce these percepts in human observers also evoked weaker responses or none in these neurons. We found these neurons with increasing frequency in areas V1, V2 and V3/V3A. The results suggest that the visual cortex not only detects biological objects, but also lines and other bar-like objects from sparse dot stimuli, and that this function evolves at an early stage of processing.

Animals↗
PubMed1990

Monocular stereopsis with and without head movement.

Random dots moving with various velocity gradients were presented to observers; the motion was yoked to head movement in one condition and to no head movement in another. In Experiment 1, 12 observers were shown motion gradients with sine, triangle, sawtooth, and square waveforms with amplitudes (equivalent disparities) of 12' and 1 degrees 53'. In Experiment 2, 48 observers were shown only the sinewave or square-wave gradient of 1 degrees 53' disparity either with or without head movement so that the observers' expectation to see depth in one condition did not transfer to another. The main findings were: (1) with 12' disparity, the head-movement condition produced perceived depth but almost no perceived motion, whereas the no-head-movement condition produced both perceived depth and perceived motion; (2) with 1 degrees 53' disparity, both conditions produced perceived depth and perceived motion; and (3) when the expectation to see depth was removed, the no-head-movement condition with the square-wave gradient produced no perceived depth, only motion. We suggest that monocular stereopsis with head movement can be achieved without perception of motion but monocular stereopsis without head movement requires perception of motion.

Attention↗
PubMed2000

Interactions between first- and second-order motion revealed by optokinetic nystagmus.

A previous study has suggested that second-order motion is ineffective at driving optokinetic nystagmus (OKN) when presented alone. First- and second-order motion cues interact in creating the perception of motion. Is there an interaction between first- and second-order cues in the control of eye movements? We presented combinations of first- and second-order cues moving in the same or opposite directions and measured the eye movements evoked, to look for a modification of the oculomotor response to first-order motion by simultaneously presented second-order cues. Dynamic random noise was used as a carrier for first- and second-order drifting gratings (13.4 degrees/s; 0.25 cycles/degree; 64 x 48 degrees screen viewed at 28.5 cm). Second-order gratings were defined by spatial modulation of the luminance flicker frequency of noise pixels of constant contrast (50%). A first-order, luminance-defined grating (13.4 degrees/s; 0.25 cycles/degree; variable contrast from 4-50%) was moved in either the same or the opposite direction. Eye movements were recorded by video-oculography from six subjects as they looked straight ahead. The gain (eye velocity/stimulus velocity) of first-order-evoked OKN increased with contrast. The presence of flicker-defined second-order motion in the opposite direction attenuated this OKN below a first-order contrast of 15%, although it had little effect at higher contrasts. When first- and second-order motion were in the same direction, there was an enhancement of the OKN response. We conclude that second-order motion can modify the optokinetic response to simultaneously presented first-order motion.

Contrast Sensitivity↗
PubMed1990

What can a moving face tell us?

This research assessed the impact of facial motion on perceptions of age-related person qualities. Ss judged the power of point-light displays of the faces of children, middle-aged adults, and elderly adults. Ratings were obtained of (a) dynamic displays filmed while the stimulus persons were reciting the alphabet, (b) dynamic displays filmed, while the stimulus persons engaged in an interaction, and (c) static versions of the displays. Facial age exerted no effect on the perceived power of nondynamic displays. However, moving displays of children's faces were judged to be less powerful than were those of adults. Differences in perceived age could not explain these effects. The implications of these data for the developing area of social event perception are discussed.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Psychophysical evidence of a sustained input to directionally selective motion mechanisms.

Human psychophysical evidence congruent with neurophysiological findings of a sustained input to directionally selective motion sensors in cat visual cortex is reported. Apparent motion was produced by displaying a group of dots in two frames (F1 and F2), where F2 was a translated version of F1. All stimulus sequences included a period during which F1 and F2 were displayed concurrently (combined images) and a period during which only F1 or F2 was on display (single images). There were three stimulus sequences: a display beginning with combined and ending with single image, a display beginning with single and ending with combined image, and a display beginning with F1, continuing with combined image, and ending with F2. Six durations of single and of combined images (10, 20, 40, 80, 160, and 320 ms) were crossed factorially in each stimulus sequence. Directional motion was seen easily at long durations of the single image in all stimulus sequences, as would be expected on the basis of a sustained input to the directional-motion-sensing mechanisms. Perception of directional motion improved with the duration of single images, but declined as the duration of combined images was increased. Baker and Cynader's model could account for the effect of duration of single images, but not for the effect of duration of combined images. An elaborated version of the model provides a good qualitative match to all empirical findings.

Humans↗
PubMed1964

HUMAN PERCEPTION.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Form Perception↗
PubMed2005

Seeing motion in depth using inter-ocular velocity differences.

An object moving in depth produces retinal images that change in position over time by different amounts in the two eyes. This allows stereoscopic perception of motion in depth to be based on either one or both of two different visual signals: inter-ocular velocity differences, and binocular disparity change over time. Disparity change over time can produce the perception of motion in depth. However, demonstrating the same for inter-ocular velocity differences has proved elusive because of the difficulty of isolating this cue from disparity change (the inverse can easily be done). No physiological data are available, and existing psychophysical data are inconclusive as to whether inter-ocular velocity differences are used in primate vision. Here, we use motion adaptation to assess the contribution of inter-ocular velocity differences to the perception of motion in depth. If inter-ocular velocity differences contribute to motion in depth, we would expect that discriminability of direction of motion in depth should be improved after adaptation to frontoparallel motion. This is because an inter-ocular velocity difference is a comparison between two monocular frontoparallel motion signals, and because frontoparallel speed discrimination improves after motion adaptation. We show that adapting to frontoparallel motion does improve both frontoparallel speed discrimination and motion-in-depth direction discrimination. No improvement would be expected if only disparity change over time contributes to motion in depth. Furthermore, we found that frontoparallel motion adaptation diminishes discrimination of both speed and direction of motion in depth in dynamic random dot stereograms, in which changing disparity is the only cue available. The results provide strong evidence that inter-ocular velocity differences contribute to the perception of motion in depth and thus that the human visual system contains mechanisms for detecting differences in velocity between the two eyes' retinal images.

Adaptation, Physiological↗
PubMed2003

Spatial and temporal tuning of motion in depth.

We used the Pulfrich effect to investigate perception of motion in depth. Independent manipulation of spatial and temporal frequency content in stereoscopic motion stimuli revealed the tuning characteristics of motion-in-depth perception. Sensitivity to interocular phase difference between sinusoidally oscillating sine-wave gratings was measured in four observers who judged direction of motion in depth. Discrimination thresholds in terms of interocular phase difference were determined to investigate spatial and temporal tuning characteristics of a system that is based on interocular phase difference, interocular delay, binocular disparity and velocity difference. Temporal frequency tuning of interocular phase difference thresholds was band pass and relatively dependent on spatial frequency variation. These results together with evidence from two control experiments support the idea that sensitivity to direction of motion in depth is limited by a stereo-motion system that monitors binocular horizontal disparity and motion rather than interocular phase difference, interocular delay, or interocular velocity difference.

Computer Simulation↗
PubMed1994

Antagonistic comparison of temporal frequency filter outputs as a basis for speed perception.

The prevailing view of motion detection in human vision is that the retinal image is convolved with each of a set of spatiotemporal filters and that perceived speed emerges from a process of pooling the outputs of these filters. Such a system can operate only if multiple filters exist; ideally the filters should also be fairly narrowly tuned in both spatial and temporal frequency. These constraints are met in the case of spatial frequency. But several studies suggest that multiple, finely tuned temporal filters do not exist; instead just two (perhaps three) broadly-tuned temporal mechanisms can be identified. We report some experiments concerning the effects of adaptation to motion on perceived speed. It is shown that perceived speed is increased by adaptation in some circumstances and decreased in others. We then present a computational model in which a temporal frequency code, on which perceived speed is presumed to be based, is derived by a process of antagonistic comparison of the responses of two psychophysically-plausible, broadly-tuned temporal mechanisms. The model, which includes the effects of adaptation to motion upon the sensitivities of the filters and the subsequent comparison of their sensitivities, is shown to give a good fit to the empirical data.

Adaptation, Ocular↗
PubMed1989

Pitch motion with random chord sequences.

Perception of global pitch motion was studied through psychoacoustic experiments with random chord sequences. Chords contained either six or eight (fixed) tone elements, being sinusoidal, sawtooth-like, or Shepard tones, which were either on or off according to a probability controlled by the experimenter. Sequences of 2, 4, 5, or 8 chords were used. Identification by subjects of the perceived direction of overall pitch motion (up or down) was found to be well accounted for by a model in which the ultimate pitch motion percept is given by a sum of contributions from selected element transitions--that is, transitions between adjoining tone elements in successive time frames only. In its simplest form, this dipole contribution model has only one free parameter, the perceptual noise for an element transition, which was estimated for various acoustic tone representations and chord arrangements. Results of two experiments, which were carried out independently in two different laboratories, are reported.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Vision: can colour contribute to motion?

Whether colour patterns that have no luminance variation can evoke the perception of visual motion has long been a controversial issue. Recent studies using new and old techniques have now provided compelling evidence that colour can indeed contribute to motion perception.

Color↗