Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Back”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,423 records · Page 79Linked to original sources
PubMed2003

Back pain and function 22 years after brace treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a case-control study-part I.

STUDY DESIGN: A consecutive series of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and brace-treated (BT) between 1968 and 1977 before age 21 years (BT: n = 127; 122 females and 5 males) were followed-up at least 20 years after completion of the treatment. OBJECTIVES: To determine the long-term outcome in terms of back pain and function in patients BT for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Few reports on long-term outcome of back pain and function have previously been presented for consecutive groups of these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred ten (87%) BT patients were reexamined as part of an unbiased personal follow-up. This included a clinical examination, evaluation of curve size (Cobb method), and degenerative findings in full standing frontal and lateral radiographs. Validated questionnaires in terms of general and disease-specific quality-of-life aspects as well as present back and pain symptoms were used. One hundred nine had complete follow-up. An age- and sex-matched control group of 100 persons was randomly selected and subjected to the same examinations. RESULTS: The deterioration of the curves was a mean of 7.9 degrees for all curves, excluding the only patient who underwent operation after 4 years (increase = 27 degrees). The patients had significantly more degenerative disc changes than the controls. Lumbar and thoracic back pain, although mild (2.7 on visual analogue scale), was significantly more frequent among the patients than the controls (75 vs. 47%, P = 0.0050 and 35.8 vs. 22.0%, P = 0.033, respectively). Only 24% of the patients admitted daily pain and analgesics were sparsely used. The patients had a slightly, but significantly, worse back function as measured by the Oswestry Disability Index (9.2 vs. 4.8, P = 0.0012) and general function score (7.7 vs. 4.2, P = 0.0006), but general health-related quality of life was not affected. No differences could be seen in sociodemographic variables between the groups, except for having ever been on sick leave because of the back (38% vs. 19%, P = 0.0036). Furthermore, no differences could be found between patients with different curve types (single thoracic, n = 50; lumbar, n = 19; double curves, n = 40). No correlation could be found between pain and its localization and curve size, an increase of at least 10 degrees since end of treatment, curve type, degenerative changes on any of the two lowest lumbar disc levels, body mass index, or smoking. CONCLUSIONS: More than 20 years after brace treatment for AIS, minimal pain and no dysfunction occurred compared with normal controls. Compared with surgically treated patients with a mean end result similar to this group, no significant differences were found except that BT patients experience more affective components of their pain.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

The use of muscle relaxant medications in acute low back pain.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. OBJECTIVES: To determine the characteristics of patients who take muscle relaxants for back pain after seeking care and to determine the relationship of muscle relaxant use with recovery from the episode of low back pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Low back pain is a common condition with a generally favorable short-term prognosis. Physicians in the acute setting commonly prescribe muscle relaxants. The indications for use and outcomes are not clear. METHODS: We performed a secondary data analysis of a cohort of 1633 patients who sought care from a variety of practitioners (primary care, physician of chiropractic, orthopedic surgeon, Health Maintenance Organization) for low back pain. Patients were enrolled in the physician's office and interviewed at baseline, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks. Pain, functional status, medication use, health care utilization, and satisfaction with care were assessed. RESULTS: Muscle relaxants were used by 49% of patients; among those who sought care from doctors, 64% used muscle relaxants. Muscle relaxant users were more impaired at baseline. Over time, among patients with greater functional status impairment (Roland disability score > 12) at baseline, muscle relaxant users had somewhat slower recovery from the episode of back pain. This finding persisted after controlling for baseline functional status, age, worker's compensation status, and use of nonsteroidal inflammatory agents. CONCLUSIONS: Use of muscle relaxants was very common among patients with acute low back pain. Muscle relaxant use was not associated with more rapid functional recovery.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2004

Active warming during emergency transport relieves acute low back pain.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective randomized blinded trial in a prehospital emergency system. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of external active warming on acute back pain during rescue transport to hospital. BACKGROUND DATA: Acute low back pain is one of the complaints that most often entails a visit to the physician or use of the emergency system. Superficial (e.g., hydrocolloid packs) and deep heating (e.g., ultrasound) can relieve acute low back pain in a clinical setting. Recent data showed significant benefit for patients in pain from minor trauma treated by active warming during emergency transport. Accordingly, we tested the hypothesis that active warming would reduce pain and anxiety in patients with acute low back pain being transported to a hospital. METHODS: A total of 100 patients were included in our study. We selected only those suffering from acute pain > 60 mm on a visual analog scale in the lower back. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups: active warming with a carbon-fiber electric heating blanket (Group 1) versus passive warming with a woolen blanket (Group 2) during transfer to hospital. RESULTS.: Pain scores on arrival at the hospital differed significantly between Group 1 and Group 2 (P < 0.01). In Group 1, pain reduction from 74.2 +/- 8.5 mm VAS to 41.9 +/- 18.9 mm VAS (P < 0.01) was noted between departure from the emergency site and arrival at the hospital. Pain scores remained practically unchanged in Group 2 (73.3 +/- 11.9 mm VAS and 74.1 +/- 12.0 mm VAS). CONCLUSIONS: Active warming reduces acute low back pain during rescue transport.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

MR aortography and serum cholesterol levels in patients with long-term nonspecific lower back pain.

STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional analysis of the feeding arteries of the lumbar spine and cholesterol levels on patients with long-term nonspecific lower back pain. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether occlusion of lumbar and middle sacral arteries or serum cholesterol levels are associated with lower back pain and/or with disc degeneration. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Atherosclerosis in the wall of the abdominal aorta usually develops at the ostia of branching arteries and the bifurcation, and may obliterate orifices of lumbar and middle sacral arteries. Obstruction of these arteries causes ischemia in the lumbar spine and may result in back symptoms and disc degeneration. METHODS: MR aortography and cholesterol blood tests were performed on 51 patients with long-term lower back pain without specific findings (i.e., spinal or nerve root compression) in regular lumbar MR images. The patients ranged from 35 to 70 years of age (mean age, 56 years). Serum cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels were measured. To assess symptoms and disability NASS low back Outcome Instrument was used. RESULTS: Twenty-nine (78%) of 37 men and 11 (77%) of 14 women showed occluded lumbar and/or middle sacral arteries. The prevalence of occluded arteries was 2.5 times more than in subjects of corresponding age group in a Finnish necropsy material. Twenty-three (62%) men and seven (50%) women had significant disc degeneration. Disc degeneration was associated with occluded lumbar/middle sacral arteries (P = 0.035). Patients with occluded arteries or significant disc degeneration did not complain more severe symptoms than those without, whereas patients with above normal serum LDL cholesterol scored higher in neurogenic symptoms (P = 0.031) and complained more often severe pain (P = 0.049) than those with normal LDL cholesterol. CONCLUSIONS: The study indicates that lumbar and middle sacral arteries are often occluded in patients with nonspecific long-term lower back pain. Occlusion of these arteries may also be associated with disc degeneration.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

The updated cochrane review of bed rest for low back pain and sciatica.

STUDY DESIGN: A systematic review within the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group. OBJECTIVES: To report the main results from the updated version of the Cochrane Review on bed rest for low back pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There has been a growing amount of evidence showing that bed rest is not beneficial for people with low back pain. However, existing systematic reviews are unclear regarding the effects of bed rest for different types of low back pain. METHODS: All randomized studies available in systematic searches up to March 2003 were included. Two reviewers independently selected trials for inclusion assessed the validity of included trials and extracted data. Investigators were contacted to obtain missing information. RESULTS: Two new trials comparing advice to rest in bed with advice to stay active were included. There is high quality evidence that people with acute low back pain who are advised to rest in bed have a little more pain (standardized mean difference 0.22, 95% confidence interval: 0.02-0.41) and a little less functional recovery (standardized mean difference 0.29, 95% confidence interval: 0.05-0.45) than those advised to stay active. For patients with sciatica, there is moderate quality evidence of little or no difference in pain (standardized mean difference -0.03, 95% confidence interval: -0.24-0.18) or functional status (standardized mean difference 0.19, 95% confidence interval: -0.02-0.41) between bed rest and staying active. CONCLUSION: For people with acute low back pain, advice to rest in bed is less effective than advice to stay active. For patients with sciatica, there is little or no difference between advice to rest in bed and advice to stay active.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

Multidisciplinary group rehabilitation versus individual physiotherapy for chronic nonspecific low back pain: a randomized trial.

STUDY DESIGN: A randomized trial. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of a semi-intensive multidisciplinary rehabilitation for patients with chronic low back pain in an outpatient setting. SUMMARY AND BACKGROUND DATA: Systematic reviews have shown that there is strong evidence that intensive multidisciplinary treatment (>100 hours), which includes functional restoration, improves function among chronic patients with low back pain, and moderate evidence that it reduces pain but contradictory evidence regarding improvement of working ability. However, there is paucity of data whether semi-intensive outpatient multidisciplinary rehabilitation in groups is more effective than individual physiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 120 women employed as healthcare and social care professionals with nonspecific chronic low back pain were recruited from two occupational healthcare centers. The patients were randomized into two intervention programs. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation (n = 59) was conducted in groups and comprised of physical training, workplace interventions, back school, relaxation training, and cognitive-behavioral stress management methods for 70 hours. The individual physiotherapy (n = 61) included physical exercise and passive treatment methods administered for 10 hours. Main outcome measures were: back pain and sciatic pain intensity, disability, sick leaves, healthcare consumption, symptoms of depression, and beliefs of working ability after 2 years. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between the two treatment groups in main outcome measures just after rehabilitation, at 6-, at 12-, or 24-month follow-up. In both intervention arms, however, the before-and-after comparison showed favorable effects, and the effects were still maintained at 2 years follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicate that semilight outpatient multidisciplinary rehabilitation program for female chronic low back pain patients does not offer incremental benefits when compared with rehabilitation carried out by a physiotherapist having a cognitive-behavioral way of administering the treatment.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Minimal clinically important change for pain intensity, functional status, and general health status in patients with nonspecific low back pain.

STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the Minimal Clinically Important Change (MCIC) of the pain intensity numerical rating scale (PI-NRS), the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale (QBPDS), and the Euroqol (EQ) in patients with low back pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: MCIC can provide valuable information for researchers, healthcare providers, and policymakers. METHODS: Data from a randomized controlled trial with 442 patients with low back pain were used. The MCIC was estimated over a 12-week period, and three different methods were used: 1) mean change scores, 2) minimal detectable change, and 3) optimal cutoff point in receiver operant curves. The global perceived effect scale (GPE) was used as an external criterion. The effect of initial scores on the MCIC was also assessed. RESULTS: The MCIC of the PI-NRS ranged from 3.5 to 4.7 points in (sub)acute patients and 2.5 to 4.5 points in chronic patients with low back pain. The MCIC of the QBPDS was estimated between 17.5 to 32.9 points and 8.5 to 24.6 points for (sub)acute and chronic patients with low back pain. The MCIC for the EQ ranged from 0.07 to 0.58 in (sub)acute patients and 0.09 to 0.28 in patients with chronic low back pain. CONCLUSION: Reporting the percentage of patients who have made a MCIC adds to the interpretability of study results. We present a range of MCIC values and advocate the choice of a single MCIC value according to the specific context.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

A German version of the Extended Aberdeen Back Pain Scale: development and evaluation.

STUDY DESIGN: Psychometric testing of translated, culturally adapted questionnaire. OBJECTIVES: Cross-cultural adaptation of the German version of the Extended Aberdeen Back Pain Scale (EABPS, three questionnaires), and to evaluate its use for assessing back pain related health status and disability in German patients. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The EABPS can be used as one questionnaire for the whole spine or three questionnaires for the three parts of the spine: neck, upper back, and lower back. It was shown to be valid, reliable, and responsive. No German version was available. METHODS: The EABPS was translated and adapted. The three questionnaires were evaluated separately. A total of 158 outpatients with neck pain, upper back pain, and/or low back pain were assessed by the EABPS-G at admission, 148 patients 1 day later for retest. For testing responsiveness, the standardized response mean (SRM) was chosen and for criterion validity a generic and cLBP-specific measure (SF-36 and FFbH-R). RESULTS: Between the first and second questionnaire, high correlations (from 0.93 to 0.95) represent a very high level of test-retest reliability. Criterion validity showed high (negative) correlations between the questionnaires for the three spinal areas on the one side and the FFbH-R and the SF-36 on the other. The SRM for the three questionnaires indicated remarkable changes ranging from 1.36 to 1.96. CONCLUSIONS: The EABPS-G is a valid, reliable, and responsive questionnaire for assessing health status and disability influenced by pain in one or more area of the spine and allows intercultural comparisons with the original English version. It could be used for assessment of current state as well as measurement for change.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Information and low back pain management: a systematic review.

STUDY DESIGN: A systematic search of three electronic databases was done to identify randomized controlled trials on the effect of written or audiovisual information in low back pain. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether information is an effective preventive action and/or therapy for low back pain and which type of information is most effective. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Information is commonly used in the primary care of low back pain and mostly delivered by booklets. METHODS: A systematic computer-aided search of the Medline, PsyclInfo, and Embase database. A rating system was used to assess the strength of the evidence, based on the methodologic quality of the randomized controlled trials, the relevance of the outcome measures, and the consistency of the results. RESULTS: Eleven randomized controlled trials were selected, including seven trials of high methodologic quality, as well as one parallel group controlled survey and one longitudinal study. Only three of the seven high-quality studies showed favorable results for information. There is strong evidence that a booklet increases knowledge and moderate evidence that physician-related cues increase the confidence in a booklet and adherence to exercises. There is limited evidence that a biopsychosocial booklet is more efficient than a biomedical booklet to shift patient's beliefs about physical activity, pain, and consequences of low back trouble. There is strong evidence that booklets are not efficient on absenteeism and conflicting evidence that they are efficient on healthcare use. There is no evidence that e-mail discussion or video programs alone are effective to reduce low back pain, disability, and healthcare costs. CONCLUSIONS: Information based on a biopsychosocial model is recommended in primary care to shift patient beliefs on low back pain. Nevertheless, information delivery alone is not sufficient to prevent absenteeism and reduce healthcare costs.

Databases, Factual↗
PubMed2006

Balloon kyphoplasty for symptomatic vertebral body compression fractures results in rapid, significant, and sustained improvements in back pain, function, and quality of life for elderly patients.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, single-arm interventional cohort. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of balloon kyphoplasty to treat symptomatic vertebral body compression fractures (VCFs). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: VCFs treated nonoperatively can diminish function and quality of life, and lead to chronic health effects. The short-term safety and effectiveness of balloon kyphoplasty for symptomatic VCFs are well-documented, but long-term follow-up is needed. METHODS: A total of 155 elderly patients with symptomatic VCFs were enrolled in a prospective, multicenter treatment study of balloon kyphoplasty at 19 geographically diverse US centers. Outcomes included back pain severity, bedrest, and limited activities because of back pain, back disability score, and SF-36 Medical Outcomes Survey, at 7 days (visual analog scale only), and 1, 3, 12, and 24 months after treatment. RESULTS: Patients reported severe back pain (15/20 on visual analog scale) interfering with daily activities 90% of days per month before kyphoplasty. Physical functioning and quality of life were also markedly impaired. Statistically significant (P < 0.001) improvements occurred in all pain, functional, and mental health outcomes at the first follow-up after treatment and were maintained for 24 months. CONCLUSIONS: Elderly patients with symptomatic VCFs had rapid, significant, and sustained improvements in back pain, back function, and quality of life following balloon kyphoplasty.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Changes in vertebral wedging rate between supine and standing position and its association with back pain: a prospective study in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective consecutive series. OBJECTIVE: To analyze supine and standing radiographs and the association of back pain using subjective pain criteria. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: It has been considered that there is little correlation between the degree of collapse of the vertebral body and the level of pain. In previous studies, however, measurements have only been based on supine radiographs. Although there were 2 authors who reported the results of supine lateral and standing lateral radiographs in patients with thoracolumbar vertebral fractures, as far as we know, there has not been any detailed report concerning the correlation between radiologic findings using supine and standing lateral radiographs and back pain. METHODS: We examined 100 consecutively treated patients, prospectively. Back pain and the supine and standing radiographs were assessed 1 month after injury. Changes in vertebral wedging rate (WR) from supine to standing position (Delta WR) was reported by the following equation: Delta WR = WR(standing)-WR(supine). RESULTS: The median age of the cohort was 75 years (range, 60-89 years). The median VAS of back pain at supine position, at standing position, and when standing erect was 13, 33, and 41, respectively. The median wedging rate on the supine and standing radiographs were 28% and 37%, respectively (P < 0.001). There was a significant correlation between Delta WR and back pain when standing erect (r = 0.79, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Changes in vertebral wedging rate between supine and standing position and its association with back pain may give a clue to the pathogenesis of pain from osteoporotic thoracolumbar vertebral compression fractures.

Aged↗
PubMed2007

The long-term effect of multidisciplinary back training: a systematic review.

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials. OBJECTIVES: To determine the long-term effect of multidisciplinary back training on the work participation of patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Chronic low back pain is influenced by multiple factors. Multidisciplinary back training represents one of the options to take this multiplicity into account. So far, only evidence of the short-term effectiveness of this approach in terms of work participation is available. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched and the references of various articles were screened for relevant publications. Ten studies met the inclusion criteria. All included studies were evaluated for their methodologic quality. RESULTS: Five of the studies had a low methodologic quality. All high-quality studies found a positive effect on at least one of the 4 outcome measures used. Based on our criteria, effectiveness was found for the outcome measures of work participation and quality of life. No effectiveness was found for experienced pain and functional status. The intensity of the intervention seems to have no substantial influence on the effectiveness of the intervention. CONCLUSION: In the long-term, multidisciplinary back training has a positive effect on work participation in patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain.

Chronic Disease↗
PubMed2006

Aerobic fitness in women with chronic discogenic nonradicular low back pain.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine if aerobic fitness varies between women with and without chronic discogenic non-radicular low back pain. DESIGN: Prospective cross-sectional descriptive study. RESULTS: : Analysis of variance revealed that maximal oxygen consumption was lower (P = 0.05) in women with low back pain compared with the control group. In addition, there was a significant reduction (P = 0.05) in reported exercise training duration and frequency but no change in exercise intensity (P = 0.1) in the study group after the onset of low back pain. The low back pain group had minimal disability (19%) based on the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire. CONCLUSIONS: Women with chronic discogenic non-radicular low back pain have lower maximal oxygen consumption than age-matched controls. However, this study group continued to exercise safely at the same exercise training intensity as before their low back pain and had minimal disability and above-average aerobic fitness.

Adult↗
PubMed1988

Osteoporosis and back pain among the elderly.

Questionnaire responses from 120 men and 337 women over the age of 50 years were studied to determine the prevalence of back pain among the elderly. In order to gain a rough indication of the back pain among elderly women which might be due to osteoporosis, the prevalence was compared in the two sexes. The prevalence of back pain without radiation to the legs and concomitant morbidity was found to be similar among men and women up to the 70-79-year age-group. After this age the prevalence was higher in women. Those with exceptional loss of body height or kyphosis had a high prevalence of back pain, while those who had sustained previous hip or radius fractures did not. There was increasing prevalence of back pain among women with increasing number of previous fractures. The study gives little indication of serious morbidity of osteoporosis in the form of back pain before very old age.

Age Factors↗
PubMed2001

Evaluating and managing acute low back pain in the primary care setting.

Acute low back pain is a common reason for patient calls or visits to a primary care clinician. Despite a large differential diagnosis, the precise etiology is rarely identified, although musculoligamentous processes are usually suspected. For most patients, back symptoms are nonspecific, meaning that there is no evidence for radicular symptoms or underlying systemic disease. Because episodes of acute, nonspecific low back pain are usually self-limited, many patients treat themselves without contacting their primary care clinician. When patients do call or schedule a visit, evaluation and management by primary care clinicians is appropriate. The history and physical examination usually provide clues to the rare but potentially serious causes of low back pain, as well as to identify patients at risk for prolonged recovery. Diagnostic testing, including plain x-rays, is often unnecessary during the initial evaluation. For patients with acute, nonspecific low back pain, the primary emphasis of treatment should be conservative care, time, reassurance, and education. Current recommendations focus on activity as tolerated (though not active exercise while pain is severe) and minimal if any bed rest. Referral for physical treatments is most appropriate for patients whose symptoms are not improving over 2 to 4 weeks. Specialty referral should be considered for patients with a progressive neurologic deficit, failure of conservative therapy, or an uncertain or serious diagnosis. The prognosis for most patients is good, although recurrence is common. Thus, educating patients about the natural history of acute low back pain and how to prevent future episodes can help ensure reasonable expectations.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

The causality field (extrinsic and intrinsic factors) in industrial subacute low back pain patients.

In a prospective, randomized study, primarily designed to test the efficacy of activation on consecutive blue-collar workers sick-listed for 6 weeks due to subacute low back pain, 25% of the workers were excluded for medical reasons. In the intervention study (n = 103), only a minority of cases (6%) had 'true' subacute complaints, i.e. no prior history of low back pain. Subjective reports on general well-being, health status and work-related ergonomic factors were significantly lower or worse in patients than in reference samples. The randomized intervention study could establish a significant effect of graded activation on work return, but the effect seemed to be restricted to patients moderately disabled, i.e. one-third of the subacute low back pain patients included. A predictive four-factor model on work return increased the possibility of identifing nonresponders (chronic low back pain) more than threefold with a specificity (91%) and sensitivity (74%) comparable to that of clinical disc herniation. The history of a prolonged disablement process, cognitive factors, pain behavior and mentally straining ergonomic factors seemed to be of importance. Psychological reactions, or 'barriers to recovery', were slightly different in treatment and control groups but the type of intervention did not significantly alter the predictive model, suggesting that subsets of the study sample may benefit from other optional functional approaches. Descriptive characteristics of the study sample emphasized that subacute low back pain patients cannot be conceptualized as a homogeneous group. Four sub-groups could be identified: (a) specific medical disorders; (b) spontaneous recovery group; (c) moderately disabled back pain patients; and (d) nonresponders. The results support proposals that treatment should be tailored according to individual needs and that better case management should have priority for those belonging to the nonresponder group.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Muscular performance after a 3 month progressive physical exercise program and 9 month follow-up in subjects with low back pain. A controlled study.

The purpose of this study was to assess, in subjects with low back pain, the changes and their permanence in muscular performance after a 3 month progressive physical exercise program. Ninety subjects with chronic low back pain participated in the study. The study design was controlled and it was carried out in three groups: intensive training, home exercise, and control group. Isometric and dynamic muscle strength of the trunk and lower limb were measured, at the beginning of the study and after the 3 months exercise program, and the during each of the follow-up sessions. The Oswestry Index and back pain intensity were also determined. Both exercise groups received benefit from the progressive exercise program. Their muscular performance improved and their back pain intensity decreased significantly. Among the home exercise group, the Oswestry Index also changed positively. The results demonstrate that the home exercise program could be as effective as the intensive training program in increasing muscle strength, as well as decreasing back pain and functional disability among low back pain patients with mild functional limitations.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Relationship between radiographic abnormalities of lumbar spine and incidence of low back pain in high school rugby players: a prospective study.

The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between prevalent radiographic abnormalities of the lumbar spine and the incidence of low back pain in high school rugby players. Three hundred and twenty-seven incoming high school rugby players (15-16 years of age) were recruited between 1986 and 1994. All of them underwent athletic physical examination before participation in high school athletics. The relationship between prevalent radiographic abnormalities of the lumbar spine in the pre-participation athletic physical examination and the incidence of low back pain during a 1-year period after the start of participation in athletics was analyzed. Radiographic abnormalities assessed were spondylolysis, disc space narrowing, spinal instability, Schmorl's node, balloon disc, and spina bifida occulta. The frequency of respective radiographic abnormalities was 15.6%, 13.1%, 32.7%, 14.1%, 11.6%, and 30.6%. Two hundred and forty-three players (74.3%) had at least one of these radiographic abnormalities. The incidence of low back pain was 44.0% in players with no such radiographic abnormalities and 41.2% in those with at least one radiographic abnormality. The incidence of low back pain in players with the respective radiographic abnormalities was 72.5%, 46.5%, 46.7%, 39.1%, 34.2%, and 41.0%, and only players with spondylolysis had a significantly higher incidence of low back pain than those with no radiographic abnormalities. This study shows that a radiographic abnormality, specifically spondylolysis, is a significant radiological risk factor for low back pain in high school rugby players.

Adolescent↗