SEARCH · Search PubMed
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
We report a case of acute aortic dissection that occurred in the late course of surgically untreated atrial septal defect. A 60-year-old man with acute aortic dissection and atrial septal defect was operated on successfully, and we discuss the causal relationship between these two unusual conditions.
Two hundred seventy-five computed tomographic (CT) angiograms of the thoracic aorta were obtained over a period of approximately 4 years in patients with suspected or known aortic dissection. In all cases, unenhanced images were initially obtained, followed by contrast material-enhanced images. A variety of pitfalls were encountered that mimicked aortic dissection. These pitfalls were attributable to technical factors (eg, improper timing of contrast material administration relative to image acquisition); streak artifacts generated by high-attenuation material, high-contrast interfaces, or cardiac motion; periaortic structures (eg, aortic arch branches, mediastinal veins, pericardial recess, thymus, atelectasis, pleural thickening or effusion adjacent to the aorta); aortic wall motion and normal aortic sinuses; aortic variations such as congenital ductus diverticulum and acquired aortic aneurysm with thrombus; and penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer. Although several of these pitfalls are easy to recognize and therefore unlikely to present a diagnostic problem, others are potentially confusing. Familiarity with these common pitfalls, coupled with a knowledge of normal intrathoracic anatomy, will facilitate recognition of true aortic dissection and help avoid misdiagnosis at thoracic aortic CT angiography.
From May 1990 to January 2001, 78 patients underwent surgery for aortic dissection, 68 (87%) of type A. Presentation was acute in 55 patients (71%). For type A dissection, in-hospital mortality was 13% (9 patients) and late mortality was 16%. For type B dissection, in-hospital and late mortality were both 30% (3 patients). The follow-up was complete and medical and imaging controls were performed periodically. Computerized axial tomography has shown persistence of distal aortic dissection in 18 patients, one of whom maintained dissection of the supraaortic trunks with false lumen thrombosis. Six patients maintained signs of dissection in the thoracic and abdominal aorta with patent false lumen. In another eight patients the false lumen was thrombosed. In 3 cases the dissection was located in the abdominal aorta. Two patients developed pseudoaneurysms of the thoracic aorta, one of whom was reoperated due to symptoms of dysphagia and chest pain, with angiographic signs of probable rupture of the aorta. Periodic imaging monitoring is essential, as it allows assessment of the extent of residual aortic disease and its evolution, with early detection of possible complications. This will enable prompt and safe action in those patients who may benefit from reoperation.
BACKGROUND: Even with rapid diagnosis and effective medical treatment mortality in type B aortic dissection with evidence of extraaortic leakage of blood remains high. Considering a mortality rate of 29% to 50% associated with emergency surgical repair, the concept of endovascular stent-graft placement may become a life-saving option in impending or evolving rupture by endovascular sealing of the entry tear and subsequent abortion of leakage. METHODS: The concept was tested by comparing short-term and 1-year outcomes of 11 patients after emergency endovascular stent-graft placement with historic-matched control patients subjected to conventional therapy. All patients had acute type B dissection complicated by loss of blood into periaortic spaces. RESULTS: Emergency stent-graft placement was successful without periprocedural morbidity, aborted leakage, and ensured reconstruction of the dissected aorta; at a mean follow-up of 15 +/- 6 months no death had occurred in the stent-graft group whereas four patients had died with conventional treatment (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: With appropriate logistics and expertise, type B aortic dissection with leakage and evolving rupture may benefit from nonsurgical reconstruction of the dissected segment by endovascular stent grafts.
From January 1991 to May 1994, we have operated on 15 cases of Type B aortic dissection. In 10 of these patients, thoracoabdominal repair was performed. According to Crawford's classification, 2 patients fell into Type I, 6 patients into Type II, and 2 patients into Type III. The aneurysms were exposed through a left thoracotomy extending into the retroperitoneum with the hemidiaphragm divided circumferentially. The operations were performed under femoro-femoral partial cardiopulmonary bypass. In 6 of these cases selective perfusion of the visceral branches was used. The celiac axis was reconstructed in 10 patients, superior mesenteric artery in 9, right renal artery in 7, left renal artery in 6. Abdominal vessels were reconstructed by the "inclusion" technique described by Crawford in 2 patients, by "beveling" the distal prosthetic end in 6 and by the "interposition" technique in 4 patients. Vessels arising from the false lumen were reconstructed by the "interposition" technique. To prevent paraplegia, the evoked spinal cord potentials by direct stimulation of the cord (ESPs-dsc) were monitored perioperatively and the aneurysms were repaired sequentially in segments. In all patients except 2 with Crawford type III aneurysms, spinal cord ischemia was detected by ESPs-dsc. In 7 of these patients, 2 to 8 pairs of intercostal/lumbar arteries (I/L aa.) that arose from the "responsible" aortic segment were reconstructed. Reconstruction techniques included the "inclusion" technique in 2 patients, the "beveling" technique in 1, the "interposition" technique in 1 and the "on lay grafting" technique in 3 patients. One hospital death occurred in a patient who had chronic renal insufficiency and liver cirrhosis preoperatively. Spinal cord injury occurred in 5 patients, including 4 paraparesis and 1 delayed-onset paraplegia. In 2 of these patients, responsible I/L aa., were not reconstructed correctly despite ESPs changes, and injury might have been prevented if reconstruction of the "responsible" arteries had been performed. Thoracoabdominal repair for chronic Type B aortic dissection could be performed safely with an acceptable mortality rate. Spinal cord injury remains an unsolved problem.
BACKGROUND: Acute aortic dissection (AAD) is sometimes complicated by respiratory failure due to severe lung oxygenation impairment. Systemic activation of inflammatory system after aortic injury may play some roles in the development of this complication. The aim of this study was to determine the significance of serum C-reactive protein (CRP) elevation in the development of oxygenation impairment and clinical outcome with distal type AAD. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 61 patients, who were admitted with distal type AAD within 24 h from the onset, were examined. Serum CRP levels, white blood cell (WBC) counts and body temperature were measured serially for at least 4 days. Oxygenation impairment, defined as the lowest PaO2/FIO2 ratio < or = 200 mmHg, was noted in 31 patients (51%). In patients with oxygenation impairment, peak CRP levels (20.7+/-7.9 vs. 12.7+/-3.8 mg/dl, P < 0.001), peak WBC counts (14,600+/-3600 vs. 11,800+/-4300/mm3, P = 0.008) and body temperature (38.4+/-0.5 vs. 38.0+/-0.6 degrees C, P = 0.004) were significantly higher than those without. Peak CRP level was inversely correlated with the lowest PaO2/FIO2 (P < 0.001). Patients who underwent urgent surgical treatment and/or died in the hospital had higher peak CRP levels (25.1+/-12.3 vs. 16.1+/-7.4 mg/dl, P = 0.010) than those who did not. Multivariate analysis revealed that a peak CRP level > or = 15 mg/dl (relative risk = 12.6, P < 0.001) was an independent determinant of the development of oxygenation impairment. CONCLUSION: The greater serum CRP elevation after distal type AAD was associated with a higher incidence of oxygenation impairment and poor clinical outcome. Systemic activation of the inflammatory system after aortic injury may play an important role in the development of oxygenation impairment.
This report describes a case of acute type A aortic dissection which had resulted in coma. Angiography had revealed obstruction of the right common carotid artery. Since signs of impending aortic rupture or severe aortic insufficiency were missing, an extraanatomic femoro-carotid bypass was inserted and resulted in the patient's regaining consciousness. Two days after the first operation, the ascending aorta and aortic valve were reconstructed successfully anastomosing the divided caudad end of the bypass to the ascending aortic graft.
We present two cases of malperfusion syndrome due to aortic dissection type-B. A supra-renal blind sac phenomenon resulted in renal failure and absent femoral pulses in both patients. Additionally, one patient suffered from spinal cord ischemia, the other from severe abdominal pain. By interventional techniques, catheter perforation of the blind sac was achieved. The resulting re-entries were enlarged with a balloon catheter. Distal perfusion without pressure gradients was restored by this technique in both patients and resulted in complete relief of symptoms. Percutaneous fenestration of the aortic dissection membrane may be an alternative to operative treatment in malperfusion syndrome.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the outcome of 3 different surgical approaches for treatment of acute aortic dissection type A (AADA). METHODS AND RESULTS: Between October 1990 and October 2003, we operated on 295 patients (pts) for AADA. Follow-up was complete for 257 pts (87%). Supracommissural replacement (SCR) of the ascending aorta was applied to 145 pts, 64 pts received a composite replacement (comp), and 48 pts were treated with the aorta valve-sparing (AVS) reimplantation technique. Pts in SCR were older compared with AVS and comp (P=0.002), gender (overall 65% male, P=0.143) and presence of Marfan syndrome (overall 5%, P=0.109) were comparable. Cannulation of the aorta was performed more often in AVS (58%) than in comp (19%) or SCR (22%; P<0.001). Mean operation time, extracorporeal circulation time, and aortic cross-clamp time differ significantly between groups (P<0.001, respectively). Stay in the intensive care unit (P=0.12) and time of hospitalization (P=0.32) were comparable. Overall perioperative mortality was 24% and did not show significant differences between groups (AVS 10.4% versus comp 28% versus SCR 26%; P=0.053). Incidence of neurological complications was similar between groups (P=0.95). Mean time of follow-up was shorter for AVS (19+/-20 months) compared with comp (48+/-48 months) and SCR (46+/-45 months). Survival at 5 years was comparable with 89% for AVS, 85% for comp, and 80% for SCR (P=0.61). Two patients from AVS (4.1%) required reoperation for failure of the reconstructed valve. Pts in comp required less aortic reoperations than pts in SCR (comp 6.3% versus SCR 22%; P=0.005). CONCLUSIONS: In acute aortic dissection type A, the reimplantation technique leads to results comparable to established techniques. Complete removal of diseased tissue, low incidence of reoperation, and lack of anticoagulation may favor this approach in selected patients.
Between 1963 and 1983, 55 patients presented to our hospital with a clinical picture that suggested aortic dissection but with aortograms that were interpreted as negative for that entity. In 4 patients, the aortographic findings subsequently proved to be false negative. The remaining 51 patients had the following diagnoses: myocardial infarction in 9 patients; aortic regurgitation in 5; thoracic nondissecting aneurysm in 4; musculoskeletal pain in 4; mediastinal tumor in 4; pericarditis in 3; acute coronary insufficiency in 3; cholecystitis in 2; miscellaneous in 3; and unknown in 14. The clinical features in these patients were compared with those of 125 patients with true aortic dissection. Three features were significantly more prevalent in patients with than without dissection: prior systemic hypertension, pain for 24 hours or less, and migratory pain. Patients without dissection were younger than those with distal dissection and had significantly less systemic hypertension, posterior thoracic pain and migratory pain. Patients without dissection had significantly less frequent congestive heart failure, pulse deficits and aortic regurgitation, and more frequent hypertension and pain for more than 24 hours than patients with proximal dissection. This study defines the actual differential diagnosis of aortic dissection at our hospital, the frequency of false-negative aortographic findings and contrasts the clinical features of patients with and without dissection.
A high autopsy incidence, 7 of 50 cases (14%), of aortic dissection as the major cause of death in patients who died following aortocoronary saphenous vein bypass is reported. The patients ranged in age from 45 to 61 years, and all had moderately severe aortic atherosclerosis. None was hypertensive, and no significant predisposing aortic medial disease was recognized. Trauma during surgical cannulation with retrograde perfusion through atherosclerotic femoral or iliac arteries was considered the initiating event leading to ileo-aortic dissection in five of the seven patients. Damage secondary to aortic cross-clamping is suggested as the pathogenetic mechanism leading to dissection in the other two patients. In six patients, the dissection was Type I of DeBakey, and in one patient, Type II. Dissection was recognized intra-operatively in five of the seven patients. In older patients, particularly those likely to have atherosclerosis of the aorta and its main branches, vigilance regarding the possibility of aortic dissection developing during the course of cardiopulmonary bypass must be constant.
Cardiovascular complications of cocaine abuse include myocardial ischemia and infarction, dysrhythmias, cardiomyopathies and aortic dissection. The case in point pertains to a 26-year-old, Caucasian male, substance abuser who suffered a thoracic aortic dissection following the use of crack cocaine. The autopsy and histological findings showed a connective tissue abnormality including a focal microcystic medial necrosis and a fragmentation of the elastic fibers in the arterial walls. Blood concentrations of cocaine and benzoylecgonine, taken individually, were considered to be within a potentially toxic range. Blood concentrations of methadone also indicated use of this drug at the same time. The small amounts of morphine found in the blood and urine were compatible with heroine or morphine use more than 24 h before death.
BACKGROUND: With the general increase in human lifespan, aortic surgeons are faced with an increasing prevalence of acute type A aortic dissection in the elderly. In this study, we reviewed early and late surgical outcomes of acute type A dissection (operation within 48 hours after onset) in patients aged 75 years and older. METHODS: Between 1990 and 1999, 109 patients underwent emergency operation for acute type A dissection at Omiya Medical Center. Twenty-three patients were aged 75 years and older (elderly group, mean age, 79.1 +/- 4.7 years) and 86 were younger than 75 years old (younger group, mean age, 58.7 +/- 10.8 years). Early and late outcomes of both groups were compared. RESULTS: The hospital mortality rates were 13.0% (3 of 23) in the elderly group and 10.5% (9 of 86) in the younger group (p = 0.71). In the elderly, actuarial survival rate (including the operative mortality rate) at 1, 3, and 5 years was 78% +/- 9% for each point. In the younger group, the rates were 88% +/- 4% at 1 year, 83% +/- 4% at 3 years, and 81% +/- 5% at 5 years (p = 0.57). Actuarial event-free rates were 84% +/- 8% at 1 year, 77% +/- 11% at 3 years, and 77% +/- 11% at 5 years in the elderly group. In the younger group, the rates were 96% +/- 2% at 1 year, 88% +/- 4% at 3 years, and 81% +/- 7% at 5 years (p = 0.27). CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences in the hospital mortality, actuarial survival, or event-free rates were observed between the two groups. Operation for type A acute aortic dissection in patients aged 75 years or older can be performed with acceptable risk of death, and long-term results are satisfactory.
Because survivors of thoracic aortic dissection require follow-up to detect prognostic factors such as intimal tears, persistent flow in the false lumen, and complications associated with grafts, we compared transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) prospectively in 14 patients 1 year after their initial examination. Residual dissection was identified by both techniques in 11 patients. Flow and/or thrombus in the false lumen were detected by TEE in 10 (91 %) and 6 (55%) patients, respectively, and by MRI in 9 (82%) and 5 (45%), respectively (p = NS); more tears were detected by TEE (2.5 +/- 1.4 per patient vs 0.2 +/- 0.4; p < 0.005). Satisfactory delineation of a graft in the ascending aorta was noted in all 8 (100%) of the surgically treated patients by TEE compared with 4 (50%) by MRI (p < 0.005). The upper ascending aorta was visualized clearly in fewer patients by TEE than by MRI (7 [50%] vs 13 [93%]; p < 0.05), as were the origins of the head and neck vessels (10 [71%] vs 13 [93%], p = NS). We conclude that TEE and MRI are both suitable techniques for the follow-up of patients with aortic dissection. TEE is more sensitive in identifying prognostic factors. MRI has a complementary role, particularly in visualization of the upper ascending aorta and the head and neck vessels.
BACKGROUND: Since 1985, we have selectively treated acute type B aortic dissections. Initial treatment lowered blood pressure and heart rate. Transesophageal echocardiography and computed tomographic scans were used to diagnose and follow up the patients. Patients were operated on for organ ischemia, pain, hypertension, or increasing subpleural fluid on computed tomographic scan. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients admitted over a 10-year period to the Mt. Sinai Hospital. RESULTS: From August 1985 to May 1995, 68 patients were seen. Three died soon after admission during initial diagnostic evaluation. Seventeen patients underwent operation without mortality or paraplegia (group 1). Forty-seven of 48 patients treated nonoperatively were discharged; 1 patient died of rupture on day 7 (group 2). Actuarial survival for all 68 patients at 1 and 5 years was 92% +/- 4% and 82% +/- 8%. Group 1 survival was 93% +/- 4% and 68% +/- 5%, and group 2 survival was 90% +/- 6% and 87% +/-14%. There were no differences between groups. Late intervention was required in 2 group 1 patients (12%) and in 12 of 48 group 2 patients (25%), again without mortality or paraplegia. CONCLUSIONS: This experience suggests that selective management of acute type B aortic dissection results in acceptable short-term and long-term survival. Avoiding early operation did not compromise late results.
OBJECTIVES: We sought to describe the midterm results of extensive primary repair of the thoracic aorta by means of the modified elephant trunk technique with a stent graft for acute type A aortic dissection, particularly the changes of the false lumen shown by enhanced computed tomographic scanning. METHODS: The subjects were 35 consecutive patients who received arch replacement with open stent grafting for type A acute aortic dissection between December 1997 and April 2002. The mean follow-up period was 55 months (range, 30-83 months). Computed tomographic scanning was performed at 1, 3, 12, and 36 months postoperatively to detect thrombosis and obliteration of the false lumen after its exclusion by the stent graft. The diameter of the aorta was measured at 3 levels: the distal edge of the stent graft, the diaphragm, and the origin of the superior mesenteric artery. RESULTS: Two patients died in the initial operation, but no patients required additional surgical treatment of the thoracic aorta. The mean diameter of the stent grafts was 26.2 mm, and the mean length was 8.9 cm. Thrombus formation in the false lumen was recognized at the distal edge of the graft in all patients, at the diaphragmatic level in 26 patients, and at the superior mesenteric artery level in 15 patients. Obliteration of the false lumen was recognized at the distal edge of the graft in all patients, at the diaphragmatic level in 20 patients, and at the superior mesenteric artery level in 15 patients. The aorta distal to the stent graft showed minimal changes. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute type A aortic dissections, it is possible to perform extensive primary repair of the thoracic aorta with relative safety by using a synthetic graft with a self-expanding stent, and this method might reduce the necessity of further operations not only for the distal descending aorta but also for the thoracoabdominal aorta.
Intravascular ultrasonography, balloon angioplasty, stent placement, and endovascular septal fenestration have been used in the evaluation and treatment of vascular complications of acute and chronic aortic dissection in five patients. There were three men and two women with an average age of 52 years (range 39 to 64 years). There were three chronic type A dissections, one acute type B, and one subacute type B dissection. Intravascular ultrasonography was used in all five cases. The three patients with chronic type A dissections underwent unilateral renal artery angioplasty (RA PTA) and stent placement; one patient with an acute type B dissection and associated fibromuscular dysplasia underwent bilateral RA PTA without stent placement. These procedures were performed to ameliorate severe hypertension. The final patient, with a subacute type B dissection, underwent iliac artery stenting to correct severe lower extremity ischemia. During a second intervention, this patient, who also had bowel ischemia and nonresolving acute renal failure, underwent balloon dilatation of a preexisting septal fenestration to augment visceral blood supply and bilateral RA PTA and stent placement in an effort to improve renal function. This patient eventually died of gut ischemia. After RA PTA and stent placement, one patient had a major intrarenal hemorrhage that required coil embolization and transfusion. In the four survivors, RA PTA and stent placement resulted in immediate improvement in blood pressure control. This response has been sustained during follow-up intervals ranging from 8 to 18 months (average 10 months). Intravascular ultrasonography can clearly demonstrate the pathologic anatomy associated with aortic dissection (even when angiography is ambiguous) and is essential for guiding therapeutic endovascular interventions. Further exploration of the efficacy of these endovascular techniques is warranted in this high-risk group of patients with aortic dissection who have appropriate clinical indications.
The case of a 28-year-old previously healthy male with a 13-year history of weight lifting is described. The patient presented to the emergency department complaining of severe anterior chest pain beginning during a workout. Following transthoracic echocardiogram and computerized tomogram the diagnosis of an ascending aortic dissection was made. The patient was taken emergently for surgical repair of an incompetent aortic valve and type II aortic dissection. Histopathologic examination of the aorta showed cystic medial degeneration. This is the first reported case of a type II aortic dissection secondary to cystic medial degeneration and the hemodynamic stresses of weight lifting. Physicians should be aware of this potentially catastrophic entity in weight lifters.