SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “THERAPEUTICS”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,405 records · Page 78Linked to original sources

PubMed2000

Is there a role for therapeutic drug monitoring of new anticonvulsants?

Despite the fact that all new anticonvulsants have undergone extensive pharmacokinetic scrutiny prior to their introduction to the market, the opportunity to perform good prospective studies on their concentration-effect relationship has been largely missed, in some cases deliberately because therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is considered unfavourable for the marketing of a new drug. However, there are reasons to believe that TDM may play a useful role in maximising the therapeutic potential of new anticonvulsants. In fact, these drugs have a narrow therapeutic index, careful individualisation of dosage to optimise response is required, and inter- and intra-individual pharmacokinetic variability may translate into differences in dosage requirements. The wide interindividual variability in the serum concentrations at which therapeutic and toxic effects of these drugs are observed does not necessarily imply that TDM cannot be useful: indeed, a marked pharmacodynamic variability has also been reported for all the currently monitored older anticonvulsants. The new anticonvulsants which, based on their properties, are particularly attractive candidates for TDM include lamotrigine, topiramate, tiagabine, zonisamide and felbamate. However, in the absence on sound information on the target concentration ranges of these drugs, the routine concentration monitoring of these drugs cannot be recommended. Despite this, serial measurements of serum drug concentrations may be useful in selected patients, especially those suspected of poor compliance and those in whom pharmacokinetic changes caused by disease or administration of concomitant medication are anticipated. Even in the presence of marked interindividual pharmacodynamic variability, it is often possible to empirically determine the concentration at which each patient exhibits the best response, and apply that information in subsequent management. Prospective studies, using preferably a randomised concentration-controlled design, are necessary to better characterise concentration-effect relationships for these agents.

Anticonvulsants↗

PubMed1986

Fluoxetine. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic efficacy in depressive illness.

Fluoxetine is a new antidepressant which enhances serotoninergic neurotransmission through potent and selective inhibition of neuronal reuptake of serotonin. Metabolism by N-desmethylation occurs in man yielding desmethylfluoxetine, which also inhibits serotonin reuptake. Both the parent compound and metabolite possess elimination half-lives of several days facilitating the maintenance of steady-state plasma concentrations during long term treatment. Fluoxetine has overall therapeutic efficacy comparable with imipramine, amitriptyline and doxepin in patients with unipolar depression treated for 5 to 6 weeks, although it may be less effective than tricyclic antidepressants in relieving sleep disorders in depressed patients. Geriatric patients also responded as well to fluoxetine as to doxepin. The symptomatic improvement in patients with unipolar depression during short term fluoxetine treatment has been satisfactorily maintained when therapy was extended for at least 6 months: the relapse rate was low and similar to that of imipramine. Preliminary data have shown that patients with bipolar depression gained similar therapeutic benefit from fluoxetine or imipramine. Other preliminary trials have indicated that fluoxetine may be useful in obsessive-compulsive disorders. Usual doses of fluoxetine cause significantly fewer anticholinergic-type side effects than tricyclic antidepressants. Nausea, nervousness and insomnia are the most frequently reported fluoxetine-related adverse effects, but these have usually not been severe. Therapeutic doses of fluoxetine do not affect cardiac conduction intervals in patients without pre-existing cardiovascular disease and fluoxetine has been relatively safe in the small number of patients who have taken overdoses. It has not been clearly established whether some types of depression may respond more readily to fluoxetine than other antidepressants, and its overall therapeutic efficacy has not been compared with other second generation antidepressants. Thus, with its different and perhaps improved side effect profile compared with older tricyclic antidepressants, fluoxetine offers properties that could be used to advantage in many patients with depression.

Animals↗

PubMed1989

Labetalol. A reappraisal of its pharmacology, pharmacokinetics and therapeutic use in hypertension and ischaemic heart disease.

Since labetalol was first reviewed in the Journal (1978), its scope of therapeutic use has expanded and become better defined. Labetalol is an adrenoceptor blocking drug with combined alpha- and beta-blocking properties. These result in a more favourable haemodynamic profile for labetalol compared with 'pure' beta-blockers or pure alpha-blockers, but also contribute to a wider range, but not an overall increased incidence, of adverse effects. The drug is effective and well-tolerated in patients with all grades of hypertension, but is of particular value in special subgroups such as Black patients, the elderly and patients with renal hypertension. While comparative studies are not extensive, available data show that the drug reduces blood pressure to a similar extent, and in a similar proportion of patients, as 'pure' beta-blockers such as propranolol, pure alpha-blockers such as prazosin, calcium antagonists (nifedipine, verapamil), and centrally acting drugs (clonidine and methyldopa). Labetalol is very effective in hypertensive pregnant women and in hypertensive crises, where it provides good control of blood pressure without serious adverse effects, and where few therapeutic options exist. Few controlled studies have investigated the use of labetalol in deliberate induction of hypotension or prevention of hypertension during anaesthesia, and also in patients with ischaemic heart disease. However, available evidence suggests a role for labetalol in these indications and further studies should aid in clarification of its efficacy in these areas. Thus, with its broad scope of therapeutic use in hypertension labetalol remains an important therapeutic option, and the drug may well find an additional place in the treatment of myocardial ischaemia if further evidence confirms encouraging preliminary findings.

Coronary Disease↗

PubMed1989

Dothiepin. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic efficacy in depressive illness.

Dothiepin is a tricyclic antidepressant that is structurally related to amitriptyline. It appears that the antidepressant activity of dothiepin is mediated through facilitation of noradrenergic neurotransmission by uptake inhibition and possibly also by enhancement of serotoninergic neurotransmission. The overall therapeutic efficacy of dothiepin is very similar to that of amitriptyline. In addition, dothiepin appears to be comparable to imipramine, doxepin, maprotiline, mianserin, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine and trazodone. Dry mouth is the most commonly reported side effect of therapeutic doses but the incidence of this and other anticholinergic side effects is less among patients treated with dothiepin than with amitriptyline. However, the sedative/anxiolytic activity of dothiepin is similar to that of amitriptyline. Dothiepin has not been associated with cardiotoxicity at therapeutic doses. Thus, many years of extensive clinical use have shown that dothiepin is now an established and effective antidepressant in both inpatients and outpatients with depressive symptoms of varying severity and coexisting anxiety. Its therapeutic equivalence to other tricyclics ensures its place as a treatment alternative in these disorders.

Animals↗

PubMed1993

Zonisamide. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in epilepsy.

Zonisamide is a 1,2 benzisoxazole derivative and the first agent of this chemical class to be developed as an antiepileptic drug. It has shown activity in various animal models of epilepsy, and although a detailed mode of action awaits clarification it appears to block the propagation/spread of seizure discharges and to suppress the epileptogenic focus. Clinical experience with zonisamide in Japan has documented its efficacy in the treatment of partial seizures (partial-onset generalised tonic-clonic, simple partial and/or complex partial seizures), and to a more variable extent, generalised tonic-clonic, generalised tonic (mainly seen in symptomatic generalised epilepsies including Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome) and compound/combination seizures (including those refractory to treatment with other antiepileptic drugs). Other generalised seizure types have also responded to therapy with zonisamide, although only small patient numbers were studied. Zonisamide has demonstrated efficacy equivalent to that of carbamazepine in patients with (mainly) partial seizures, and to that of valproic acid in a small study of children (n = 32) with generalised seizures. Animal studies suggest that zonisamide possesses a more favourable therapeutic index than most other antiepileptic drugs. However, clinical trials conducted to date, have not confirmed any overt tolerability advantage. Indeed, whereas the recommended therapeutic plasma zonisamide concentration is 20 mg/L, clinical investigations have associated adverse events with plasma zonisamide concentrations of > 30 mg/L, suggesting the usefulness of therapeutic drug monitoring. Moreover, although plasma concentrations of zonisamide are empirically regarded to be proportional to therapeutic doses in patients in Japan, nonlinear pharmacokinetics have been reported for this drug in patients in the US and may further complicate its use in this patient population. Additional pharmacokinetic studies will help to establish the change in pharmacokinetic profile that occurs with dosage titration in patients outside Japan. Among 700 patients treated with zonisamide in Europe/US, a high incidence of renal calculi (1.9%) has been noted, however, the causal relationship to zonisamide is disputed. Indeed, although urinary lithiasis has also been recorded for patients in Japan, the aetiology, incidence and spontaneous regression of this condition suggest that it is not a serious problem for this patient population. Until this difference is clarified, it is likely that zonisamide will find its greatest use in the treatment of patients in Japan. Like many other established antiepileptic drugs, available data suggest the propensity for zonisamide to alter the pharmacokinetic profile of other anticonvulsant agents, although severe interactions appear to be unlikely.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Animals↗

PubMed1998

Formoterol. An update of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy in the management of asthma.

Formoterol, a selective beta 2-adrenoceptor agonist, produces effective dose-proportional bronchodilation, which persists for up to 12 hours, in patients with reversible obstructive respiratory disease. Bronchodilation is significant within minutes of inhalation, maximal within 2 hours, and at therapeutic doses is equivalent to that produced by standard doses of traditional beta 2-agonists. In single-dose studies comparing the two long-acting beta 2-agonists formoterol and salmeterol, significant bronchodilation is achieved more rapidly with formoterol than salmeterol. Duration of bronchodilation is similar with both drugs. The therapeutic efficacy of inhaled formoterol has been equal to or greater than that of salbutamol (albuterol), fenoterol and terbutaline in both short and long term clinical trials. Formoterol reduces symptoms of nocturnal asthma and reduces the need for rescue medication compared with salbutamol. Recent studies have shown that the addition of inhaled formoterol 12 or 24 micrograms twice daily to existing inhaled corticosteroid regimens improves lung function and reduces asthma symptoms compared with placebo. In one well designed study, the frequency of severe exacerbations of asthma over 12 months was decreased by adding formoterol to existing regimens of inhaled corticosteroids. Tolerance to the bronchodilator response of formoterol has not been observed in long term clinical trials. Because of its long duration of action, formoterol offers significant therapeutic advantages over shorter-acting beta 2-agonists in the treatment of nocturnal and exercise-induced asthma. Formoterol is effective in preventing exercise-induced asthma in adults and children and confers significantly more protection than salbutamol when administered 3 and 12 hours before exercise. In general, inhaled formoterol is well tolerated. The most commonly reported adverse effects, tremor and palpitations, are those traditionally associated with the use of beta 2-agonists. Oral formoterol and high doses of inhaled formoterol are associated with more adverse events than are the recommended doses of 6 to 24 micrograms. Formoterol is currently recommended for use as an alternative to increasing inhaled steroid dosage in patients whose symptoms are inadequately controlled despite therapy with low to moderate doses of inhaled steroids and intermittent short-acting beta 2-agonists, and results of recent studies support therapeutic guidelines. Long term clinical studies comparing formoterol and salmeterol have not yet been published. Further studies to evaluate the earlier use of formoterol in patients with mild to moderate asthma are needed to determine the role and long term safety of formoterol in the management of asthma.

Anti-Asthmatic Agents↗

PubMed2002

Balsalazide: a review of its therapeutic use in mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis.

UNLABELLED: The aminosalicylate balsalazide is a prodrug which is metabolised by bacterial azo reductases in the colon to release its therapeutically active moiety mesalazine [mesalamine (US) or 5-aminosalicylic acid] and an inert carrier molecule. The systemic absorption of balsalazide and its metabolites is not required for the therapeutic efficacy of the drug, and has been demonstrated to be limited. Data from well designed trials with a duration of 8 to 12 weeks show that oral balsalazide 6.75 g/day is as effective as (two trials) or more effective than (one trial) oral delayed-release (pH-dependent) mesalazine 2.4 g/day and appears to be as effective as oral sulfasalazine 3 g/day in the treatment of active mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis. In addition, balsalazide appears to have a faster onset of action than mesalazine. Furthermore, balsalazide was as effective as delayed-release mesalazine (dosages used were 1.2 and 1.5 g/day, where 1.6 g/day is recommended) and oral sulfasalazine 2 g/day (recommended dosage) in the prevention of relapse in ulcerative colitis in remission after 6 to 12 months of treatment; the balsalazide dosage was 3 g/day versus mesalazine and 2 g/day versus sulfasalazine. Although not well established, additional benefits may be achieved with balsalazide dosages up to 6 g/day. Data from well designed, 2- to 12-month trials show that balsalazide is well tolerated by patients with ulcerative colitis in both acute and maintenance indications, and is better tolerated than standard formulations of sulfasalazine at therapeutically relevant dosages. CONCLUSION: Balsalazide is a well tolerated and effective first-line therapeutic option for patients with ulcerative colitis, both for the treatment of active mild-to-moderate disease and as maintenance therapy to prevent disease relapse.

Aminosalicylic Acids↗

PubMed1992

Interpreting pharmacoeconomic and quality-of-life clinical trial data for use in therapeutics.

Interpretation of quality-of-life (QOL) and pharmacoeconomic data for therapeutic decision making and therapeutic policy planning requires a basic understanding of the methods, assumptions and limitations of the data and associated methods of analysis. Measures of the effectiveness of different pharmaceutical agents can be modified by including functions which involve assessment of the treated individual's quality of life. These quality-adjusted effectiveness measures will alter conclusions concerning clinical decisions as well as the cost-effectiveness of the comparative agents under consideration. To provide a conceptual and analytical framework for understanding the relationship between QOL assessment and pharmacoeconomic modelling, interpretations of the quality-adjusted analyses are reviewed, conceptual and analytical models are proposed, and recommendations for using QOL data in pharmacoeconomic models are outlined. Techniques for incorporating QOL measures in pharmacoeconomic models are examined using a hypothetical model involving therapeutic assessments of antiviral treatments for individuals with HIV disease. Adjustments of effectiveness measures based upon QOL-related functions are then globally addressed using stochastic compartmental models. Three specific methods for adjustment used in therapeutic trials are reviewed. Applications of these techniques to 3 studies involving the treatment of HIV disease and hypertension are critically reviewed. Issues relevant to choosing or estimating measures of quality of life for use in pharmacoeconomic models are summarised, and research guidelines are proposed.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗

PubMed1995

Research and development costs for new drugs by therapeutic category. A study of the US pharmaceutical industry.

The clinical period (i.e. clinical trial and long term animal testing) development costs of a random sample of new chemical entities (NCEs) were examined for differences in average cost. All of the NCEs studied were first tested in humans between 1970 and 1982, and were classified for the purposes of the study by therapeutic class. The costs of unsuccessful projects were included with those of projects that resulted in US marketing approval. Including income forgone from expending funds before returns are earned ('time costs'), the capitalised (i.e. out-of-pocket plus time) clinical period costs per approved NCE were $US70, $US98, $US103 and $US163 million (1993 dollars) for anti-infective, cardiovascular, neuropharmacological and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, respectively. Combining the data for all therapeutic categories, the mean clinical period cost per approved NCE was $US93 million. Omitting costs associated with unsuccessful projects, the mean capitalised clinical period costs for approved NCEs ranged from $US7.1 million (for topical steroids) to $US66.7 million (for cardiovascular agents) [1993 dollars]. The estimates of total clinical period costs per approved NCE depend on average out-of-pocket clinical phase costs, attrition rates across phases (i.e. the rates at which compounds drop out of active testing), the probability of marketing approval, and development and regulatory review times. Phase attrition and approval rates are the most important sources of variability in total clinical period costs between therapeutic categories. Development cost estimates by therapeutic category did not correlate strongly with US sales in the fifth year of marketing. Cardiovascular NCEs had much higher than average sales revenues, but clinical development costs for these drugs were only slightly above average. Conversely, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs attained average sales revenues, but had much higher than average development costs.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗

PubMed2006

Therapeutic monitoring of antiepileptic drugs during pregnancy and in the postpartum period: is it useful?

As in all patient populations, epilepsy is common in pregnant women. Consequently, approximately 1 in 200 pregnancies is exposed to antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Although exposure to AEDs in utero has been associated with an increased risk of major fetal malformations, most women with epilepsy require medication throughout pregnancy, since seizures themselves may be potentially harmful not only for the mother but also for the developing fetus. Physiological changes during pregnancy result in a reduction in the serum concentrations of most AEDs, particularly in late pregnancy. Changes in protein binding lead to a greater reduction in total than free (active) drug concentrations. Pharmacokinetic changes in pregnancy show interindividual variability and are not well understood for most newer AEDs. However, recent studies have shown that changes in lamotrigine clearance are particularly marked, with increases in each trimester and a significant fall in plasma concentrations, leading to consequent breakthrough seizures in some women. Concentrations may then rise precipitously after delivery, leading to symptoms of lamotrigine toxicity. Therapeutic drug monitoring could theoretically guide adjustment of AED dosage to achieve good seizure control while minimising fetal exposure, although there are several limitations to such monitoring. Firstly, there are wide interindividual variations in serum drug concentrations, with seizure control often correlating poorly with a given therapeutic range. Secondly, therapeutic ranges have not been well defined for newer AEDs and their measurement is often not always available. Thirdly, for highly protein-bound drugs, although measurement of free drug concentrations may more accurately reflect drug availability during pregnancy than total drug concentrations, assays for this are not always available and may be unreliable. Thus, it may be useful, prior to pregnancy, to establish the total and free drug concentrations required to achieve optimal seizure control in a given individual. Regular monitoring of AEDs has been advocated in each trimester and shortly after delivery, with adjustment of dosage to avoid seizure precipitation during pregnancy or symptoms of toxicity after birth. More frequent monitoring has been recommended for lamotrigine. However, aggressive drug monitoring of any AED has yet to be proven to be effective in improving seizure control or care. Furthermore, higher doses may be associated with a greater potential for teratogenicity and it is not yet known whether longer term adverse effects may be related to in utero exposure in the latter half of pregnancy. There is limited evidence about the relationship of maternal serum drug concentrations and teratogenicity. While there is a theoretical role for therapeutic drug monitoring in improving the risk-to-benefit ratio of AED therapy during pregnancy, there are many practical limitations. Future work is needed to clarify its role in improving seizure control during pregnancy and identifying serum drug concentrations that may be considered safe for fetal exposure.

Anticonvulsants↗

PubMed2002

Therapeutic approaches in multiple sclerosis: lessons from failed and interrupted treatment trials.

The therapy for multiple sclerosis (MS) has changed dramatically over the past decade. Recent immunobiological findings and current pathophysiological concepts together with advances in biotechnology, improvements in clinical trial design and development of magnetic resonance imaging have led to a variety of evaluable therapeutic approaches in MS. However, in contrast to the successfully introduced and established immunomodulatory therapies (e.g. interferon-beta and glatiramer acetate), there have been a remarkable number of therapeutic failures as well. Despite convincing immunological concepts, impressive data from animal models and promising results from phase I/II studies, the drugs and strategies investigated showed no benefit or even turned out to have unexpectedly severe adverse effects. Although to date there is no uniformly accepted model for MS, there is agreement on the significance of inflammatory events mediated by autoreactive T cells in the CNS. These can be modified therapeutically at the individual steps of a hypothetical pathogenetic cascade. Crucial corners like: the prevalence and peripheral activation of CNS-autoreactive T cells in the periphery;adhesion and penetration of T cells into the CNS;local activation and proliferation and;de- and remyelination processes can be targeted through their putative mediators. Like a 'specificity pyramid', therapeutic approaches therefore cover from general immunosuppression up to specific targeting of T-cell receptor peptide major histocompatibility (MHC) complex. We discuss in detail clinical MS trials that failed or were discontinued for other reasons. These trials include cytokine modulators [tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha antagonists, interleukin-10, interleukin-4, transforming growth factor-beta2], immunosuppressive agents (roquinimex, gusperimus, sulfasalazine, cladribine), inducers of remyelination [intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg)], antigen-derived therapies [oral tolerance, altered peptide ligands (APL), MHC-Peptide blockade], T cell and T-cell receptor directed therapies (T cell vaccination, T-cell receptor peptide vaccination), monoclonal antibodies against leucocyte differentiation molecules (anti-CD3, anti-CD4), and inactivation of circulating T cells (extracorporeal photopheresis). The main conclusions that can be drawn from these 'negative' experiences are as follows. Theoretically promising agents may paradoxically increase disease activity (lenercept, infliximab), be associated with unforeseen adverse effects (e.g. roquinimex) or short-term favourable trends may reverse with prolonged follow-up (e.g. sulfasalzine). One should not be too enthusiastic about successful trials in animal models (TNFalpha blockers; oral tolerance; remyelinating effect of IVIg) nor be irritated by non-scientific media hype (deoxyspergualine; bone marrow transplantation). More selectivity can imply less efficacy (APL, superselective interventions like T-cell receptor vaccination) and antigen-related therapies can stimulate rather than inhibit encephalitogenic cells. Failed strategies are of high importance for a critical revision of assumed immunopathological mechanisms, their neuroimaging correlates, and for future trial design. Since failed trials add to our growing understanding of multiple sclerosis, 'misses' are nearly as important to the scientific process as the 'hits'.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗

PubMed2002

Therapeutic potential of implantable replacement hearts.

In patients hospitalized with decompensated life-threatening heart failure, the impact of newer pharmacologic therapies and mechanical circulatory support has not yet been realized, except for those who are bridged to cardiac transplantation. For long-term support of transplant-ineligible patients who have severe biventricular failure that is refractory to optimized pharmacologic therapy, replacement of the natural heart with a totally implantable mechanical replacement heart, capable of producing blood flow of up to 8 to 10 L/min, may become the most well tolerated and effective treatment. This article summarizes the current status of the first generation implantable replacement heart (AbioCor trade mark, ABIOMED. Inc., Danvers, MA). With regard to optimizing the further enhancement of treatment options for end-stage heart failure and other life-threatening illnesses, the pharmacodynamics-like principle of therapeutic efficiency should play a role in the development of both drugs and devices. In keeping with that principle, we recommend that adjusting a product's design input requirements to maximize the therapeutic effect per exposure and;to separate the cumulative therapeutic effects of the product from the cumulative adverse effects (of the product, and of the comorbid disease processes in the patients treated) should be part of the good product development process for any therapeutic product.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗

PubMed2002

Chromosomally-encoded resistance mechanisms of Pseudomonas aeruginosa: therapeutic implications.

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an important nosocomial pathogen that presents a difficult therapeutic challenge. Although P. aeruginosa has been shown to acquire resistance mechanisms encoded on plasmids, this pathogen comes armed with multiple chromosomally-encoded mechanisms of resistance that can provide impressive intrinsic resistance, as well as the potential to mutate to high-level multi-drug resistance. Recent analysis of the sequenced genome of P. aeruginosa PAO1 suggested that we have just started to unlock the resistance potential of this pathogen. One of the most serious threats to the usefulness of beta-lactams against P. aeruginosa is the chromosomal AmpC cephalosporinase. When AmpC production increases through mutational events, overproduction of this cephalosporinase provides high-level resistance to all beta-lactams except the carbapenems. Carbapenem resistance typically requires down-regulation of the outer membrane protein (OprD), which serves as the primary route of entry for carbapenems. Perhaps the most threatening of the resistance mechanisms encoded on the P. aeruginosa chromosome are the multi-drug efflux pumps. These pumps have the ability to extrude multiple classes of antibiotics from the periplasmic space, as well as the cytoplasm. Natural expression of efflux pumps in 'wild-type' cells plays an important role in the relatively decreased susceptibility of P. aeruginosa to antibiotics. However, the greatest therapeutic problems occur when these pumps are overproduced in mutants and high-level, multi-drug resistance develops. Although the development of infections with highly resistant strains of P. aeruginosa can present serious therapeutic challenges, the most troublesome threat associated with the chromosomally-encoded resistance mechanisms is the potential for high-level resistance to emerge during the course of therapy. When resistance emerges during therapy, clinical failure can occur and the therapeutic options for second-line therapy can become severely limited. Unfortunately, the emergence of resistance during therapy is not a rare event with P. aeruginosa and these three resistance mechanisms. Therefore, clinicians must be mindful of this threat when choosing an appropriate therapy, and usually appropriate therapy includes a combination of drugs. Since the standard combination of an aminoglycoside and a beta-lactam has been shown to be ineffective in preventing the emergence of some resistance problems, the search for more effective combinations must be a priority.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

Selectin antagonists : therapeutic potential in asthma and COPD.

Asthma and COPD are chronic inflammatory conditions that affect hundreds of millions of patients worldwide. New therapeutics are desperately needed, especially those that target the underlying causes and prevent disease progression. Although asthma and COPD have distinct etiologies, both are associated with reduced airflow caused by excess infiltration of inflammatory cells into healthy lung tissues. As selectin-mediated adhesion of leukocytes to the vascular endothelium is a key early event in the initiation of the inflammatory response, selectin inhibition is thought to be a good target for therapeutic intervention. Three known selectins are expressed in distinct subsets of cells: P-selectin is presented on the surface of activated platelets and endothelial cells, L-selectin is constitutively expressed on leukocytes, and E-selectin synthesis is upregulated in activated endothelial cells. They mediate cell-cell adhesion in the shear flow of the bloodstream via specialized interactions with clusters of oligosaccharides presented on cell surface glycopeptide ligands. The role of selectin-ligand interactions in the inflammatory response has been demonstrated in various animal models, prompting considerable attention from the pharmaceutical industry.Drug discovery efforts have yielded many different classes of selectin inhibitors, including soluble protein ligands, antibodies, oligosaccharides and small molecules. Although many selectin inhibitors have shown activity in preclinical models, clinical progress of selectin-directed therapies has been slow. Early approaches employed carbohydrate-based inhibitors to mimic the natural ligand sialyl Lewis X; however, these compounds proved challenging to develop. Cytel's CY 1503, a complex oligosaccharide, progressed to phase II/III trials for reperfusion injury, but further development was halted when it failed to demonstrate clinical efficacy. Two protein-based selectin inhibitors have reached phase II development. These included Wyeth's recombinant soluble P-selectin ligand, TSI (PSGL-1), which was discontinued after disappointing results in myocardial infarction trials and Protein Design Labs' humanized anti-L-selectin monoclonal antibody, which is currently in development for trauma. Bimosiamose, discovered by Encysive Pharmaceutical and presently being developed by Revotar Biopharmaceuticals, is an 863 g/mol molecular weight dimer with minimal carbohydrate content and is, to date, the leading selectin inhibitor in clinical development. This compound has shown promise in a phase IIa 'proof of concept' trial in patients with asthma, reducing airway recruitment of eosinophils after intravenous administration. Further clinical development of an inhaled formulation is underway. Despite a significant need for new therapeutics, selectin inhibitors have not yet been explored for the treatment of COPD. Bimosiamose represents an important proof of principle, and hopefully continued success will spark renewed interest in selectin-directed therapeutics for respiratory diseases.

Animals↗

PubMed2003

Molecular cancer therapeutics: recent progress and targets in drug resistance.

Recent progress in development of molecular cancer therapeutics revealed new types of antitumor drugs, such as Herceptin, Gleevec, and Iressa as potent therapeutics for each specific tumor. We have been working on molecular cancer therapeutics, and in particular, those related to drug resistance, Here, I describe several resistance mechanisms, including apoptosis regulation, cellular stress response and cellular survival signals which have show close relevance to drug resistance. P-glycoprotein (P-gp) is the key molecule in multidrug resistance (MDR) and a good target for chemotherapy. Proteasome is involved in the resistance mechanism to topo II-targeted chemotherapy in solid tumors. Apoptosis program in tumor cells plays a critical role in chemotherapy-induced tumor cell killing, and the blockade of the apoptosis-inducing pathway could be another mechanism for drug resistance. Glyoxalase I is a molecule involved in apoptosis resistance mechanism in tumors. Survival (antiapoptosis) signals are the good targets for various antitumor drugs to overcome innate drug resistance. Our present studies provide novel targets for effective molecular cancer therapeutics in future.

ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Mem↗

PubMed2026

Ubiquitination-Androgen Receptor Coupling in Prostate Cancer Therapeutics.

Prostate cancer is one of the most frequently diagnosed malignancies in men and a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. The androgen receptor (AR) remains the principal driver of prostate cancer progression and castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), with its stability, localization, and transcriptional activity being tightly regulated by the ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS). E3 ubiquitin ligases and deubiquitinases (DUBs) critically govern AR turnover and signalling output, thereby influencing tumour growth, therapeutic resistance, and disease progression. Emerging evidence further highlights a complex interplay between ubiquitination, DNA damage response (DDR) pathways, and ADP-ribosylation (ADPr) signalling, collectively shaping genomic stability and treatment responsiveness in prostate cancer. This review is organized into four major themes: (i) ubiquitin-mediated regulation of AR signalling, (ii) ubiquitination and DNA damage response in AR-driven prostate cancer, (iii) crosstalk between ubiquitination, ADPr, and AR-associated signalling pathways, and (iv) therapeutic strategies targeting the UPS and AR axis. This study also discusses recent advances in targeted protein degradation, modulation of E3 ligases, inhibition of deubiquitinases, and PARP-based therapeutic approaches. These emerging insights into the interconnected regulation of ubiquitination, AR signalling, DDR pathways, and ADP-ribosylation may facilitate the development of next-generation therapeutic approaches for advanced prostate cancer.

ADP-ribosylation (ADPr)↗

PubMed2004

Botulinum toxin: a successful therapeutic protein.

Botulinum toxin serotype A has proven to be a successful and valuable therapeutic protein when dosage, frequency of treatment and variety of treated clinical conditions are considered. This modern therapeutic protein was predicted by Justinus Kerner, a 19th century German physician, who provided the first detailed clinical description of botulism and its association with faulty sausage production. Kerner was preceded by Paracelsus, who described the duality of a drug as "only the dose makes a remedy poisonous". This concept is well known to modern medicinal chemists, pharmacologists and clinicians worldwide. Because botulinum toxin is an enzyme and specifically delivered to its target cell/neuron, exceedingly small doses are needed to exert its pharmacological effect. Botulinum toxin therapy is successful because of the local administration of nanogram quantities of this highly selective and long-lasting (months) therapeutic effect, which leads to symptomatic relief of numerous disease conditions. These minute therapeutic doses are dramatically lower than the doses needed to cause systemic disease (e.g. botulism). This review will focus on the current understanding of the mechanism of action of botulinum neurotoxins and the pharmacology of the various approved-marketed products and the direction of future research.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

Studies on coumarins and coumarin-related compounds to determine their therapeutic role in the treatment of cancer.

The Benzopyrones are a group of compounds whose members include coumarins and flavonoids. Dietary exposure to benzopyrones is quite significant, as these compounds are found in vegetables, fruit, seeds, nuts, coffee, tea and wine. It is estimated that the average western diet contains approximately 1 g/day of mixed benzopyrones. It is, therefore, not difficult to see why extensive research into their pharmacological and therapeutic properties is underway over many years. Coumarin is a natural substance that has shown anti-tumour activity in vivo, with the effect believed to be due to its metabolites (e.g. 7-hydroxycoumarin). This review is based on recent studies of coumarins and coumarin related compounds. Therefore, the focus will be on these relevant compounds and their therapeutic importance. A recent study has shown that 7-hydroxycoumarin inhibits the release of Cyclin D1, which is overexpressed in many types of cancer. This knowledge may lead to its use in cancer therapy. Esculetin inhibits growth and cell cycle progression by inducing arrest of the G(1) phase in HL-60 leukaemia cells, resulting from the inhibition of retinoblastoma protein phosphorylation. Recent studies investigating the potential of flavonoids as therapeutic agents have suggested they may have use in various therapeutic settings ranging from leukaemia treatment to the treatment of patients with HIV. Genistein is a well-known isoflavone and is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Studies have indicated that genistein elicits inhibitory effects on cell growth of various carcinoma cell-lines and may be a potential candidate for cancer therapy. In our research, we have investigated the effects of coumarins and coumarin-related compounds on a panel of cell-lines. The most recent work involves two cell-lines, MCF-7 a breast carcinoma and A549 a lung carcinoma. Microtitre assays were performed along with real-time analysis of cell viability using a biosensor called the Cytosensor microphysiometer. These studies suggest that both genistein and esculetin exerted the most potent inhibitory effect on cell growth in comparison to the other two compounds.

Animals↗