Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Promotion”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,405 records · Page 78Linked to original sources
PubMed1999

Strength and regulation of the different promoters for chromosomal beta-lactamases of Klebsiella oxytoca.

The two groups of chromosomal beta-lactamases from Klebsiella oxytoca (OXY-1 and OXY-2) can be overproduced 73- to 223-fold, due to point mutations in the consensus sequences of their promoters. The different versions of promoters from blaOXY-1 and blaOXY-2 were cloned upstream of the chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) gene of pKK232-8, and their relative strengths were determined in Escherichia coli and in K. oxytoca. The three different mutations in the OXY beta-lactamase promoters resulted in a 4- to 31-fold increase in CAT activity compared to that of the wild-type promoter. The G-->T transversion in the first base of the -10 consensus sequence caused a greater increase in the promoter strength of the wild-type promoter than the two other principal mutations (a G-to-A transition of the fifth base of the -10 consensus sequence and a T-to-A transversion of the fourth base of the -35 sequence). The strength of the promoter carrying a double mutation (transition in the Pribnow box and the transversion in the -35 hexamer) was increased 15- to 61-fold in comparison to that of the wild-type promoter. A change from 17 to 16 bp between the -35 and -10 consensus sequences resulted in a ninefold decrease of the promoter strength. The expression of the blaOXY promoter in E. coli differs from that in K. oxytoca, particularly for promoters carrying strong mutations. Furthermore, the blaOXY promoter appears not to be controlled by DNA supercoiling or an upstream curved DNA, but it is dependent on the gene copy number.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1989

Escherichia coli sigma 54 RNA polymerase recognizes Caulobacter crescentus flbG and flaN flagellar gene promoters in vitro.

A set of the periodically regulated flagellar (fla) genes of Caulobacter crescentus contain conserved promoter sequence elements at -24 and -12 that are very similar to the sequence of the nitrogen assimilation (Ntr) and nitrogen fixation (Nif) promoters of enteric bacteria and Rhizobium spp. Transcription from Ntr and Nif promoters requires RNA polymerase containing sigma 54 instead of the usual sigma 70 and, in the case of the Ntr promoters, is activated by the transcription factors NRI and NRII. We have now demonstrated that the C. crescentus flbG and flaN promoters, which contain the Ntr/Nif type of consensus sequence, are utilized by purified Escherichia coli sigma 54 RNA polymerase (E sigma 54) in the presence of NRI and NRII but not by the purified sigma 70 RNA polymerase (E sigma 70) of E. coli. Oligonucleotide-generated flbG promoter deletions that removed the highly conserved GG dinucleotide at -24 or the GC dinucleotide at -12 or altered the spacing between the -24 and -12 sequence elements prevented utilization of the flbG promoter by the E. coli E sigma 54. Transversions of T to G at positions -26 and -15 also inactivated flbG promoter function in the E. coli cell-free transcription system, while a transition of G to A at position -16 in the nonconserved spacer region had no effect. The C. crescentus flaO and flbF promoters, which do not contain the Ntr/Nif-type promoter consensus sequence, were not utilized by either purified E sigma 54 or E sigma 70 from E. coli. Our results help to define the features of the Ntr/Nif-type consensus sequence required for promoter utilization by purified E. coli E sigma 54 and support the idea that C. crescentus may contain a specialized polymerase with similar promoter specificity required for expression of a set of fla genes.

Bacteria↗
PubMed1999

A region of sigmaK involved in promoter activation by GerE in Bacillus subtilis.

During endospore formation in Bacillus subtilis, the DNA binding protein GerE stimulates transcription from several promoters that are used by RNA polymerase containing sigmaK. GerE binds to a site on one of these promoters, cotX, that overlaps its -35 region. We tested the model that GerE interacts with sigmaK at the cotX promoter by seeking amino acid substitutions in sigmaK that interfered with GerE-dependent activation of the cotX promoter but which did not affect utilization of the sigmaK-dependent, GerE-independent promoter gerE. We identified two amino acid substitutions in sigmaK, E216K and H225Y, that decrease cotX promoter utilization but do not affect gerE promoter activity. Alanine substitutions at these positions had similar effects. We also examined the effects of the E216A and H225Y substitutions in sigmaK on transcription in vitro. We found that these substitutions specifically reduced utilization of the cotX promoter. These and other results suggest that the amino acid residues at positions 216 and 225 are required for GerE-dependent cotX promoter activity, that the histidine at position 225 of sigmaK may interact with GerE at the cotX promoter, and that this interaction may facilitate the initial binding of sigmaK RNA polymerase to the cotX promoter. We also found that the alanine substitutions at positions 216 and 225 of sigmaK had no effect on utilization of the GerE-dependent promoter cotD, which contains GerE binding sites that do not overlap with its -35 region.

Bacillus subtilis↗
PubMed2001

Two ResD-controlled promoters regulate ctaA expression in Bacillus subtilis.

The Bacillus subtilis ResDE two-component system plays a positive role in global regulation of genes involved in aerobic and anaerobic respiration. ctaA is one of the several genes involved in aerobic respiration that requires ResD for in vivo expression. The ctaAB-divergent promoter regulatory region has three ResD binding sites; A1, A2, and A3. The A2 site is essential for in vivo promoter activity, while binding sites A2 and A3 are required for full ctaA promoter activity. In this study, we demonstrate the role of ResD~P in the activation of the ctaA promoter using an in vitro transcription system. The results indicate that the ctaA promoter (binding sites A2 and A3) has two transcriptional start sites. Binding site A2 was sufficient for weak transcription of the upstream promoter (Pv) by Esigma(A), transcription which was enhanced approximately 1.5-fold by ResD and 5-fold by ResD~P. The downstream promoter (Ps) required both binding sites A2 and A3 and was not transcribed by Esigma(A) with or without ResD~P. RNA polymerase (RNAP) isolated from B. subtilis when cells were at the end of exponential growth (T(0)) or 3, 4, or 5 h into the stationary phase (T(3), T(4), or T( 5), respectively) was used in in vitro transcription assays. Maximal transcription from Ps required T(4) RNAP plus ResD~P. RNAP isolated from a spo0A or a sigE mutant strain was not capable of Ps transcription. Comparison of the Ps promoter sequence with the SigE binding consensus suggests that the ctaA Ps promoter may be a SigE promoter. The collective data from ResD footprinting, in vivo promoter deletion analysis, and in vitro transcription assays suggest that ctaA is transcribed during late exponential to early stationary phases of growth from the Pv promoter, which requires ResD binding site A2, Esigma(A), and ResD~P, and during later stationary phase from Ps, which requires binding sites A2 and A3, ResD~P, and Esigma(E) or a sigma factor whose transcription is dependent on SigE.

Aerobiosis↗
PubMed2001

Identification of an Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae consensus promoter structure.

Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae promoter-containing clones were isolated from a genomic DNA library constructed in our lVET promoter trap vector pTF86. The promoter-containing clones were identified by their ability to drive expression of the promoterless luxAB genes of Vibrio harveyi. The degree of expression was quantifiable, and only high-expression or "hot" promoters were used for this study. Nine clones were sequenced, and their transcriptional start sites were determined by primer extension. The sequences upstream of the start site were aligned, and a consensus promoter structure for A. pleuropneumoniae was identified. The consensus promoter sequence for A. pleuropneumoniae was found to be TATAAT and TTG/AAA, centered approximately 10 and 35 bp upstream of the transcriptional start site, respectively. A comparison of the A. pleuropneumoniae consensus with other prokaryotic consensus promoters showed that the A. pleuropneumoniae consensus promoter is similar to that found in other eubacteria in terms of sequence, with an identical -10 element and a similar but truncated -35 element. However, the A. pleuropneumoniae consensus promoter is unique in the spacing between the -10 and -35 elements. The promoter spacing was analyzed by site-directed mutagenesis, which demonstrated that optimal spacing for an A. pleuropneumoniae promoter is shorter than the spacing identified for Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis promoters.

Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae↗
PubMed2005

Bacillus subtilis phosphorylated PhoP: direct activation of the E(sigma)A- and repression of the E(sigma)E-responsive phoB-PS+V promoters during pho response.

The phoB gene of Bacillus subtilis encodes an alkaline phosphatase (PhoB, formerly alkaline phosphatase III) that is expressed from separate promoters during phosphate deprivation in a PhoP-PhoR-dependent manner and at stage two of sporulation under phosphate-sufficient conditions independent of PhoP-PhoR. Isogenic strains containing either the complete phoB promoter or individual phoB promoter fusions were used to assess expression from each promoter under both induction conditions. The phoB promoter responsible for expression during sporulation, phoB-P(S), was expressed in a wild-type strain during phosphate deprivation, but induction occurred >3 h later than induction of Pho regulon genes and the levels were approximately 50-fold lower than that observed for the PhoPR-dependent promoter, phoB-P(V). E(sigma)E was necessary and sufficient for P(S) expression in vitro. P(S) expression in a phoPR mutant strain was delayed 2 to 3 h compared to the expression in a wild-type strain, suggesting that expression or activation of sigma(E) is delayed in a phoPR mutant under phosphate-deficient conditions, an observation consistent with a role for PhoPR in spore development under these conditions. Phosphorylated PhoP (PhoP approximately P) repressed P(S) in vitro via direct binding to the promoter, the first example of an E(sigma)E-responsive promoter that is repressed by PhoP approximately P. Whereas either PhoP or PhoP approximately P in the presence of E(sigma)A was sufficient to stimulate transcription from the phoB-P(V) promoter in vitro, roughly 10- and 17-fold-higher concentrations of PhoP than of PhoP approximately P were required for P(V) promoter activation and maximal promoter activity, respectively. The promoter for a second gene in the Pho regulon, ykoL, was also activated by elevated concentrations of unphosphorylated PhoP in vitro. However, because no Pho regulon gene expression was observed in vivo during P(i)-replete growth and PhoP concentrations increased only threefold in vivo during phoPR autoinduction, a role for unphosphorylated PhoP in Pho regulon activation in vivo is not likely.

Bacillus subtilis↗
PubMed1990

Activity of herpes simplex virus type 1 latency-associated transcript (LAT) promoter in neuron-derived cells: evidence for neuron specificity and for a large LAT transcript.

By using chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) assays in neuron-derived cell lines, we show here that promoter activity associated with the herpes simplex virus type 1 latency-associated transcript (LAT) had neuronal specificity. Promoter activity in these transient CAT assays coincided with a DNA region containing excellent RNA polymerase II promoter consensus sequences. Primer extension analysis in a LAT promoter-CAT plasmid construct placed the start of transcription about 28 nucleotides from the first T in the consensus TATA box sequence. Neuronal specificity of this promoter was suggested by examining the effect of sequences upstream of the promoter on CAT activity in neuronal versus nonneuronal cells. In nonneuronal cells, promoter activity was decreased 3- to 12-fold with the addition of upstream sequences. In contrast, in neuron-derived cells, the addition of upstream sequences did not decrease promoter activity. The LAT promoter predicted by our transient CAT assays was located over 660 nucleotides upstream from the 5' end of the previously mapped 2-kilobase (kb) LAT. This unusual location was explained by in situ and Northern (RNA) blot hybridization analyses that suggested that LAT transcription began near the promoter detected in our CAT assays, rather than near the 5' end of the 2-kb LAT. In situ hybridization with neurons from latently infected rabbits detected small amounts of LAT RNA within 30 nucleotides of the consensus TATA box sequence. This suggested that LAT transcription began near this TATA box. Northern blot hybridization of RNA from ganglia of latently infected rabbits revealed a faint 8.3-kb band of the same sense as LAT. We conclude that (i) the LAT promoter has neuronal specificity, (ii) the LAT promoter is located over 660 nucleotides upstream of the 5' end of the previously characterized stable 2-kb LAT, (iii) LAT transcription begins about 28 nucleotides from the first T of the consensus TATA box sequence and extends to near the first available polyadenylation site approximately 8.3 kb away, and (iv) this 8.3-kb RNA may be an unstable precursor of the more stable 2- and 1.3-kb LATs.

Animals↗
PubMed1993

Transcriptional activation by simian virus 40 large T antigen: requirements for simple promoter structures containing either TATA or initiator elements with variable upstream factor binding sites.

The simian virus 40 large T antigen is a promiscuous transcriptional activator of many viral and cellular promoters. We show that the promoter structure necessary for T antigen-mediated transcriptional activation is very simple. A TATA or initiator element is required, in addition to an upstream factor-binding site, which can be quite variable. We found that promoters containing an SP1-, ATF-, AP1-, or TEF-I-binding site, in conjunction with a TATA element, can all be activated in the presence of T antigen. In addition, preference for specific TATA elements was indicated. Promoters containing the HSP70 TATA element functioned better than those with the adenovirus E2 TATA element, while promoters containing the simian virus 40 (SV40) early TATA element failed to be activated. In addition, simple promoters containing the initiator element from the terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase gene could be activated by T antigen. The SV40 late promoter, a primary target for T antigen transcriptional activation, conforms to this simple promoter structure. The region from which most late transcripts initiate contains a cluster of initiator-like elements (SV40 nucleotides [nt] 250 to 335) forming an initiator region (IR). This lies downstream of the previously described octamer-TEF element (SV40 nt 199 to 218) which contains the TEF-I-binding sites shown to be necessary for T antigen-mediated transcriptional activation of the late promoter. We show that a simple late promoter made up of IR sequences and octamer-TEF element-containing sequences is transcriptionally activated by T antigen. These experiments also showed that specific sequences in the IR, SV40 nt 272 to 294, are particularly important for late promoter activation. Previous findings (M. C. Gruda, J. M. Zablotny, J. H. Xiao, I. Davidson, and J. C. Alwine, Mol. Cell. Biol. 13:961-969, 1993) suggested that T antigen could mediate transcriptional activation through interaction with the TATA-binding protein, as well as upstream bound transcription factors. Our present data are predicted by this model and suggest that at least one mechanism by which the T antigen manifests promiscuous transcriptional activation is its ability to interact with numerous transcription factors in a simple promoter context.

Antigens, Polyomavirus Transforming↗
PubMed1994

Dual EBNA1 promoter usage by Epstein-Barr virus in human B-cell lines expressing unique intermediate cellular phenotypes.

The use of different viral promoters for the expression of the EBNA1 gene product appears to be a critical step in the regulation of Epstein-Barr virus latent gene expression and may reflect the extent of differentiation of B-cell hosts. Low-passage Burkitt lymphoma cell lines resemble immature B cells in that they express CD10 (CALLA) and do not express B-cell activation antigens. In these cells, transcription from a promoter located in the BamHI F fragment of the viral genome results in the exclusive expression of EBNA1, referred to as the latency I pattern of viral gene expression. In contrast, high-passage Burkitt lymphoma cells and lymphoblastoid cell lines resemble activated B cells in that they do not express CD10 but do express activation antigens such as CD23. In these cells, the use of two promoters located in the BamHI W and C fragments of the viral genome leads to the expression of all six EBNA gene products (latency III). We have found that four human B-cell lines, DB, LBW2, LBW14, and Josh 7, stably express a pattern of B-cell differentiation antigens intermediate between those found in latency I and latency III cell lines and characterized by the coexpression of CD10 and CD23. The pattern of EBNA1 promoter usage in these cell lines was examined to determine whether their intermediate cellular phenotype was reflected in their patterns of viral gene expression. DB, LBW2, and LBW14 utilize both the BamHI F promoter region and BamHI W promoter region to transcribe the EBNA1 gene. This stable pattern of mixed promoter usage for the expression of the EBNA gene products in B cells has not previously been described. In addition, these three B-cell lines expressed lower levels of the viral latent gene product EBNA2 than those typically observed in latency III cells. The lower levels of activation of viral and cellular promoters known to be regulated by EBNA2 also correlated with the reduced levels of EBNA2 expression in these cells. These included the viral LMP1 and LMP2A promoters and the cellular CD23B promoter. The fourth B-cell line, Josh 7, expressed EBNA1 mRNAs derived from both the BamHI W promoter and BamHI C promoter, similar to latency III cells. The intermediate cellular phenotype in Josh 7 cells appeared to be due, in part, to a deficiency in the expression of viral LMP1.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Antigens, CD↗
PubMed1997

The adeno-associated virus type 2 p40 promoter requires a proximal Sp1 interaction and a p19 CArG-like element to facilitate Rep transactivation.

We have identified the sequence elements that are required for adeno-associated virus type 2 p40 promoter activity. Mutation of specific promoter elements showed that two Sp1 sites at approximately -50 (Sp1-50) and -70 (GGT-70) bp upstream of the start of the p40 messages were necessary for maximal promoter activity. As expected, the TATA site at -30 was also essential. In vitro DNA binding experiments confirmed that the Sp1-50 and GGT-70 sites were bound by Sp1 or Sp1-like proteins. Two other transcription elements, the ATF-80 and AP1-40 sites, may play a role in p40 activity. Mutation of these elements resulted in a modest decrease in p40 transcription, but DNA binding experiments did not clearly demonstrate binding of transcription factors to these sites. In contrast, a major late transcription factor site at -110 was shown to bind the transcription factor, but mutation of this site had no effect on p40 activity. In a previous report, we have shown that transactivation of the p40 promoter by the viral Rep proteins required an upstream Rep binding element (in the terminal repeat or the p5 promoter), an unidentified p19 promoter element, and a p40 promoter element (D. J. Pereira and N. Muzyczka, J. Virol. 71:1747-1756, 1997). Here we demonstrate that the CArG-140 element in the p19 promoter and the Sp1-50 element in the p40 promoter are the specific p19 and p40 elements required for Rep induction of p40. As in the case of the p19 promoter, Sp1 facilitates interaction of Rep with the p40 promoter by interaction of the two proteins. Furthermore, electron microscopy experiments demonstrated that when Rep is bound to an upstream Rep binding element, it can interact with a proximal Sp1 site by protein contacts and create a loop in the intervening DNA. This finding suggests a common mechanism whereby the Rep binding element in the TR or the p5 promoter induces p19 and p40 activity by interaction with their respective Sp1 sites.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1998

Reactivation of the previously silenced cytomegalovirus major immediate-early promoter in the mouse liver: involvement of NFkappaB.

The cytomegalovirus (CMV) major immediate-early promoter/enhancer is active in many cell culture systems and is considered to be one of the strongest promoters in vitro. However, when this promoter was used in in vivo approaches to gene therapy, it was silenced within a few weeks in several organs including the liver. In this study, we demonstrated transcriptional inactivation of the CMV promoter in mouse liver. In contrast to the CMV promoter, a hybrid promoter consisting of a minimal CMV promoter and the enhancer II of hepatitis B virus was active for at least 11 weeks in mouse liver. While investigating the reason for the shutdown of the CMV promoter, we did not find evidence for methylation of adenovirus DNA in the region of transgene insertion, but we could show that the silenced CMV promoter was reactivated after lipopolysaccharide treatment of mice or partial hepatectomy. Both stimuli are known to activate the transcription factor NFkappaB, which binds to four sites in the CMV promoter/enhancer. We show that expression from the CMV promoter in hepatocyte-derived cell lines in vitro depends on NFkappaB. In vivo experiments demonstrate that NFkappaB, which is not present in mouse hepatocytes in vivo, is activated after infection with recombinant adenoviruses and that the time course of NFkappaB activation parallels that of CMV promoter-dependent expression. Moreover, adenovirus infection of transgenic mice carrying a CMV promoter-driven lacZ gene leads to strong activation of the expression of this gene in the liver. Thus, NFkappaB is involved in the activation of the CMV promoter in the liver.

Adenoviruses, Human↗
PubMed2000

Induction of the cellular E2F-1 promoter by the adenovirus E4-6/7 protein.

The adenovirus type 5 (Ad5) E4-6/7 protein interacts directly with different members of the E2F family and mediates the cooperative and stable binding of E2F to a unique pair of binding sites in the Ad5 E2a promoter region. This induction of E2F DNA binding activity strongly correlates with increased E2a transcription when analyzed using virus infection and transient expression assays. Here we show that while different adenovirus isolates express an E4-6/7 protein that is capable of induction of E2F dimerization and stable DNA binding to the Ad5 E2a promoter region, not all of these viruses carry the inverted E2F binding site targets in their E2a promoter regions. The Ad12 and Ad40 E2a promoter regions bind E2F via a single binding site. However, these promoters bind adenovirus-induced (dimerized) E2F very weakly. The Ad3 E2a promoter region binds E2F very poorly, even via a single binding site. A possible explanation of these results is that the Ad E4-6/7 protein evolved to induce cellular gene expression. Consistent with this notion, we show that infection with different adenovirus isolates induces the binding of E2F to an inverted configuration of binding sites present in the cellular E2F-1 promoter. Transient expression of the E4-6/7 protein alone in uninfected cells is sufficient to induce transactivation of the E2F-1 promoter linked to chloramphenicol acetyltransferase or green fluorescent protein reporter genes. Further, expression of the E4-6/7 protein in the context of adenovirus infection induces E2F-1 protein accumulation. Thus, the induction of E2F binding to the E2F-1 promoter by the E4-6/7 protein observed in vitro correlates with transactivation of E2F-1 promoter activity in vivo. These results suggest that adenovirus has evolved two distinct mechanisms to induce the expression of the E2F-1 gene. The E1A proteins displace repressors of E2F activity (the Rb family members) and thus relieve E2F-1 promoter repression; the E4-6/7 protein complements this function by stably recruiting active E2F to the E2F-1 promoter to transactivate expression.

Adenoviridae↗
PubMed2002

Studies of the mechanism of transactivation of the adeno-associated virus p19 promoter by Rep protein.

During adeno-associated virus (AAV) type 2 productive infections, the p19 promoter of AAV is activated by the AAV Rep78 and Rep68 proteins. Rep-induced activation of p19 depends on the presence of one of several redundant Rep binding elements (RBEs) within the p5 promoter or within the terminal repeats (TR). In the absence of the TR, the p5 RBE and the p19 Sp1 site at position -50 are essential for p19 transactivation. To determine how a Rep complex bound at p5 induces transcription at p19, we made a series of p19 promoter chloramphenicol acetyltransferase constructs in which the p5 RBE was inserted at different locations upstream or downstream of the p19 mRNA start site. The RBE acted like a repressor element at most positions in the presence of both Rep and adenovirus (Ad), and the level of repression increased dramatically as the RBE was inserted closer to the p19 promoter. We concluded that the RBE by itself was not a conventional upstream activation signal and instead behaved like a repressor. To understand how the Rep-RBE complex within p5 activated p19, we considered the possibility that its role was to function as an architectural protein whose purpose was to bring other p5 transcriptional elements to the p19 promoter. In order to address this possibility, we replaced both the p5 RBE and the p19 Sp1 site with GAL4 binding sites. The modified GAL4-containing constructs were cotransfected with plasmids that expressed GAL4 fusion proteins capable of interacting through p53 and T-antigen (T-ag) protein domains. In the presence of Ad and the GAL4 fusion proteins, the p19 promoter exhibited strong transcriptional activation that was dependent on both the GAL4 fusion proteins and Ad infection. This suggested that the primary role of the p5 RBE and the p19 Sp1 sites was to act as a scaffold for bringing transcription complexes in the p5 promoter into close proximity with the p19 promoter. Since Rep and Sp1 themselves were not essential for transactivation, we tested mutants within the other p5 transcriptional elements in the context of GAL4-induced looping to determine which of the other p5 elements was necessary for p19 induction. Mutation of the p5 major late-transcription factor site reduced p19 activity but did not eliminate induction in the presence of the GAL4 fusion proteins. However, mutation of the p5 YY1 site at position -60 (YY1-60) eliminated GAL4-induced transactivation. This implicated the YY1-60 protein complexes in p19 induction by Rep. In addition, both basal p19 activity and activity in the presence of Ad increased when the YY1-60 site was mutated even in the absence of Rep or GAL4 fusion proteins. Therefore, there are likely to be alternative p5-p19 interactions that are Rep independent in which the YY1-60 complex inhibits p19 transcription. We concluded that transcriptional control of the p19 promoter was dependent on the formation of complexes between the p5 and p19 promoters and that activation of the p19 promoter depends largely on the ability of Rep and Sp1 to form a scaffold that positions the p5 YY1 complex near the p19 promoter.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1995

Core promoter specificities of the Sp1 and VP16 transcriptional activation domains.

The core promoter compositions of mammalian protein-coding genes are highly variable; some contain TATA boxes, some contain initiator (Inr) elements, and others contain both or neither of these basal elements. The underlying reason for this heterogeneity remains a mystery, as recent studies have suggested that TATA-containing and Inr-containing core promoters direct transcription initiation by similar mechanisms and respond similarly to a wide variety of upstream activators. To analyze in greater detail the influence of core promoter structure on transcriptional activation, we compared activation by GAL4-VP16 and Sp1 through synthetic core promoters containing a TATA box, an Inr, or both TATA and Inr. Striking differences were found between the two activators, most notably in the relative strengths of the TATA/Inr and Inr core promoters: the TATA/Inr promoter was much stronger than the Inr promoter when transcription was activated by GAL4-VP16, but the strengths of the two promoters were more comparable when transcription was activated by Sp1. To define the domains of Sp1 responsible for efficient activation through an Inr, several Sp1 deletion mutants were tested as GAL4 fusion proteins. The results reveal that the glutamine-rich activation domains, which previously were found to interact with Drosophila TAF110, preferentially stimulate Inr-containing core promoters. In contrast, efficient activation through TATA appears to require additional domains of Sp1. These results demonstrate that activation domains differ in their abilities to function with specific core promoters, suggesting that the core promoter structure found in a given gene may reflect a preference of the regulators of that gene. Furthermore, the core promoter preference of an activation domain may be related to a specific mechanism of action, which may provide a functional criterion for grouping activation domains into distinct classes.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1999

Two distinct gamma interferon-inducible promoters of the major histocompatibility complex class II transactivator gene are differentially regulated by STAT1, interferon regulatory factor 1, and transforming growth factor beta.

The major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II transactivator (CIITA) is the master regulatory factor required for appropriate expression of class II MHC genes. Understanding the expression of CIITA is key to understanding the regulation of class II MHC genes. This report describes the independent regulation of two distinct CIITA promoters by cytokines with opposing functions, gamma interferon (IFN-gamma) and transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta). A functional analysis of deletion mutations of the upstream promoter (promoter III) identified an IFN-gamma-responsive region located approximately 5 kb from the transcriptional start site. An in vivo DNase I hypersensitivity analysis detected a hypersensitive site in this area which supports the relevance of this region. When the downstream promoter (promoter IV) was studied by in vivo genomic footprinting, IFN-gamma-induced changes at putative binding sites for STAT1, interferon regulatory factor 1 (IRF-1), and E-box proteins were seen. Gel shift and supershift analyses for IRF-1 confirmed the in vivo footprint results. The role of the IFN-gamma-inducible transcription factor STAT1 was examined functionally. Although both promoters were controlled by STAT1, promoter-specific regulation was exhibited. The IFN-gamma response of promoter III was completely dependent on STAT1 and not IRF-1, while promoter IV was partially activated by IRF-1 in the total absence of STAT1 expression. While both promoters were affected by TGF-beta, activation of promoter III by IFN-gamma was more severely diminished by TGF-beta treatment. The differential control of CIITA promoters by TGF-beta, IRF-1, and STAT1 may be important in refining regulation of class II MHC genes in different cell types and under different stimulatory conditions.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1984

Effect of intercalating agents on RNA polymerase I promoter selection in Xenopus laevis.

We have analyzed the effect of DNA intercalating agents on the transcription signals from two different Xenopus laevis RNA polymerase I promoters. The transcription signal from the promoter for the 7.5-kilobase rRNA precursor (the gene promoter) is unaffected over a large range of intercalating agent concentrations regardless of whether the template is injected plasmid DNA in oocytes, the amplified endogenous nucleoli of oocytes, or the endogenous chromosomes of cultured Xenopus kidney cells. The transcription signal from a closely related promoter located in the spacer DNA between genes (the spacer promoter) ranges between undetectable to equivalent to the gene promoter signal on different templates. The transcription signal from the spacer promoter is also differentially affected by intercalating agents relative to the gene promoter. Depending on the template, these agents can either increase or decrease the transcription signal from the spacer promoter. Fusions between the gene and spacer promoters demonstrate that intercalating agents affect transcription initiation. One explanation for these results is that the degree of supercoiling of the template DNA can differentially inhibit transcription from the spacer promoters. The different effects of intercalating agents on transcription from the spacer promoters of various templates could then be explained as differences in the degree of supercoiling present on these templates initially.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Value of p16INK4a and RASSF1A promoter hypermethylation in prognosis of patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer.

The p16INK4a and RASSF1A are tumor suppressor genes frequently inactivated by de novo promoter hypermethylation in non-small cell lung cancer. We studied 119 patients with non-small cell lung cancer (70 stage I/II and 49 stage IIIA) who had undergone surgery with curative intent. The p16INK4a and RASSF1A promoter methylation statuses were determined by methylation-specific PCR. Statistical analyses, all two-sided, were performed to determine the prognostic effect of hypermethylation on various clinical parameters. Hypermethylation of the p16INK4a and RASSF1A promoters was found in 58 (49%) and 46 (39%) tumors, respectively, and 30 tumors (25%) exhibited hypermethylation of both gene promoters. In patients with stage I/II tumors, only p16INK4a promoter hypermethylation was associated with a poor 5-year overall survival rate (P=0.002). In patients with stage IIIA disease, however, RASSF1A promoter hypermethylation was a stronger predictor of a poor 5-year overall survival rate (P < 0.0001) than p16INK4a promoter hypermethylation. Among the 49 patients with stage IIIA tumors, 16 (89%) of the 18 patients whose tumors showed RASSF1A promoter hypermethylation died within 3 years after surgery, as compared with only 12 (39%) of the 31 patients whose tumors had no RASSF1A promoter hypermethylation (P < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis indicated that RASSF1A promoter hypermethylation was the stronger independent predictor for survival in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Our results indicate that p16INK4a promoter hypermethylation predicts a poor 5-year survival rates for patients with resectable non-small cell lung cancer, particularly for those with early stage tumors, whereas RASSF1A promoter hypermethylation is a profound prognostic predictor for patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer, suggesting an important role of RASSF1A in non-small cell lung cancer progression.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Src and Rac mediate endothelin-1 and lysophosphatidic acid stimulation of the human brain natriuretic peptide promoter.

Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) gene expression accompanies cardiac hypertrophy and heart failure. The vasoconstrictor endothelin-1 (ET) may be involved in the development of these diseases. ET has also been shown to activate phospholipase A(2) (PLA(2)), and the resulting metabolites are important second messengers. We studied how ET and PLA(2) metabolites regulate BNP gene expression. The human BNP (hBNP) promoter (from -1818 to +100) coupled to a luciferase reporter gene was transferred into neonatal ventricular myocytes (NVMs), and luciferase activity was measured as an index of promoter activity. ET induced BNP mRNA in NVMs as assessed by Northern blot. It also stimulated the hBNP promoter, an effect completely inhibited by actinomycin D. To test the involvement of different PLA(2) isoforms, transfected cells were treated with various PLA(2) inhibitors before stimulation with ET. Only Ca(2+)-independent PLA(2) blockade prevented ET-stimulated hBNP promoter activity. The PLA(2) metabolite lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) also activated the hBNP promoter, but arachidonic acid itself did not. ET regulation of the hBNP promoter is pertussis toxin-sensitive. The nonreceptor tyrosine kinase Src and the small GTPase Rac mediate the effects of both ET and LPA in stimulation of the hBNP promoter. We studied the involvement of cis elements in ET-stimulated hBNP promoter activity. Deletion of BNP promoter sequences from -1818 to -408 and from -408 to -40 reduced the effect of ET by 60% and 80%, respectively. Moreover, ET-stimulated luciferase activity was reduced by 50% when the proximal GATA element was mutated. These data suggest that (1) ET activates the hBNP promoter through a transcriptional mechanism; (2) LPA, perhaps generated by iPLA(2), is involved in the effect of ET; (3) Src and Rac mediate ET and LPA stimulation of the hBNP promoter; and (4) ET regulation of the hBNP promoter targets both distal and proximal cis elements.

Animals↗