SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “PLACEBOS”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,405 records · Page 78Linked to original sources

PubMed1989

Dynamics and significance of placebo response in primary dysmenorrhea.

A total of 55 patients with primary dysmenorrhea who had shown a favorable response to a preliminary treatment cycle with placebo were admitted to a double-blind study on placebo versus antiprostaglandin agents (naproxen and pirprofen). To evaluate the placebo effect and its duration, the treatment was given for 4 successive cycles. Whereas the antiprostaglandin agents were effective in most of the patients (in 80% of the pirprofen group and 85.7% of the naproxen group) and this efficacy was maintained throughout the study, a favorable response to placebo was observed in 84% in the first cycle, 29% in the second, 16% in the third and 10% in the fourth. The incidence of side effects was similar in the placebo and the active treatment groups (35.4% vs. 37.5%). It is postulated that a placebo effect in dysmenorrhea is due to a central analgesic mechanism mediated by endorphin release or possibly to psychological dynamics (mental or conditioning theories). However, this effect loses efficacy with time possibly due to a decreased susceptibility to the opioid action of the central nervous circuits responsible for menstrual pain perception or to deconditioning mechanisms.

Adult↗

PubMed1989

Ketanserin in reflex sympathetic dystrophy. A double-blind placebo controlled cross-over trial.

Ketanserin, a selective S2 serotonergic antagonist, was assessed against placebo in a double-blind cross-over study of 16 patients with chronic peripheral burning pain. Nine of these had signs of reflex sympathetic dystrophy (RSD). All patients underwent 4 intravenous regional treatments, 2 with ketanserin (10 mg for upper limb pain, 20 mg for lower limb pain) and 2 with placebo. In those patients with RSD ketanserin and not placebo provided significant (P less than 0.05) sustained pain relief as assessed by linear analogue scales. In patients who did not fulfil the criteria for RSD no significant relief was seen with placebo or ketanserin. Following tourniquet release, drowsiness, shakiness and faintness were reported at a higher (P less than 0.05) frequency after ketanserin than after placebo. All side effects were mild and transient, and no changes occurred in heart rate or blood pressure following ketanserin that were significantly different from those seen following placebo. A role for serotonin in the pathogenesis of RSD is proposed.

Adult↗

PubMed1995

Efficacy of controlled-release codeine in chronic non-malignant pain: a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

Treatment decisions for the use of opioid analgesics in chronic non-malignant pain are based primarily on survey data, as evidence from well-controlled clinical trials has been lacking. Forty-six patients with chronic non-malignant pain were enrolled in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled evaluation of controlled-release (CR) codeine. Following a 3-7-day diary familiarization period, patients were randomly assigned to 7 days of treatment each with CR codeine q12h or placebo. The CR codeine dose was determined from the consumption of acetaminophen+codeine in the 7 days preceding the study. During both phases, breakthrough pain was treated with acetaminophen+codeine every 4 h as required. Pain intensity was assessed at 08:00 h and 20:00 h using a visual analogue scale (VAS) and a 5-point categorical scale, and rescue analgesic consumption was recorded at the time of use. Thirty patients (17 female, 13 male; mean age: 55.1 +/- 13.4 years) completed the study and were treated with a mean daily CR codeine dose of 273 +/- 78 mg (range: 200-400 mg). CR codeine treatment resulted in significantly lower overall VAS pain intensity scores (35 +/- 18 vs. 49 +/- 16, P = 0.0001), categorical pain intensity scores (1.7 +/- 0.6 vs. 2.2 +/- 0.6, P = 0.0001), and in pain scores by day of treatment and by time of day. Daily rescue analgesic consumption was significantly lower on CR codeine, relative to placebo treatment (3.6 +/- 3.5 vs. 6.1 +/- 3.2 tablets/day, P = 0.0001). There was also a significant reduction in the Pain Disability Index (PDI) on CR codeine, compared to placebo (25.0 +/- 7.7 vs. 35.1 +/- 8.2, P = 0.0001). Patients' and investigators' blinded treatment preference was significantly in favor of CR codeine, relative to placebo (73% vs. 10%, P = 0.0160 and 80% vs. 7%, P = 0.0014, respectively). The incidence of nausea was significantly higher on CR codeine than on placebo (32.6% vs. 11.9%, P = 0.013). Ninety-three percent of patients completing the study requested long-term, open-label treatment with CR codeine. Pain intensity scores at the completion of 19 weeks of long-term evaluation were comparable to those during the double-blind CR codeine treatment. We conclude that treatment with CR codeine results in reduced pain and pain-related disability in patients with chronic non-malignant pain.

Acetaminophen↗

PubMed1996

Ro 15-8081 in osteoarthritis of hip and knee: a double-blind placebo-controlled multicentre dose-ranging study on analgesia.

Ro 15-8081, a substituted cyclohexanol hydrochloride, inhibits the re-uptake of norepinephrine and of serotonin. Its antinociceptive properties have been demonstrated in animals and then confirmed in humans after single-dose administration. The objective was to determine the analgesic efficacy and the safety of Ro 15-8081 in osteoarthritis of the hip and knee (femoro-tibial location) after multiple-dose application. The design for studying dosage employed 5 parallel groups in an international multicenter, double-blind, randomized trial having a duration of 2 weeks. Drugs studied were: 20 mg Ro 15-8081 (divided into 2 doses), 50 mg Ro 15-8081 (divided into 2 doses), 100 mg Ro 15-8081 (divided into 2 doses), placebo twice daily or 20 mg/day piroxicam (piroxicam in the morning and placebo in the evening). Piroxicam was used as a reference drug in order to validate clinical testing. Assessment criteria were pain (100-mm VAS) and function (Lequesne's index). A responder (main assessment criterion) was defined as a patient exhibiting a reduction of at least 30% of pain (VAS) during the study (intention-to-treat analysis). A total of 522 patients were enrolled in the study. A clear beneficial effect of piroxicam was observed when compared with placebo (70% and 48% of responders in piroxicam and placebo groups respectively; P < 0.0001). Multigroup comparison showed a statistically significant difference between Ro 15-8081 groups and the placebo group regarding mean change in pain between D1 and Dend and the rate of VAS responders. Comparison (Dunnett's t or chi 2 tests) between each individual Ro 15-8081 and the placebo group reached statistical significance for the 100 mg Ro 15-8081 group (mean change in pain between D1 and Dend: P = 0.05; percentage of responders: P = 0.0008) but no statistically significant difference for the other dosages of Ro 15-8081. Fifty-three patients withdrew from the study because of adverse events and/or inefficacy, mainly in 50 and 100 mg Ro 15-8081 groups and in a dose-related manner. The adverse events which appeared to be drug related were mainly dryness of the mouth, insomnia, headache, constipation, nausea, dizziness, nervousness, palpitation. This study suggests that 100 mg Ro 15-8081 per day divided into 2 doses has (1) an analgesic effect in hip or knee osteoarthritis and (2) poor acceptability in the conditions of the study regimen application.

Aged↗

PubMed1996

A placebo controlled double blind trial to evaluate the effectiveness of pulsed short wave therapy for osteoarthritic hip and knee pain.

The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of pulsed short wave (PSW) in the relief of pain in osteoarthritis of the hip and knee. Ninety-two patients, mean age 63 years, (34 men and 58 women) were randomly allocated to one of three groups: (1) Active PSW, using the dosage found in a pilot study to be non-significantly most effective, (2) Placebo PSW, (3) No treatment control group. Nine sessions of treatment were provided over a 3-week period, each application lasting for 15 min. The machine was modified by the manufacturers so that the therapist was able to administer the treatment and carry out assessments without being aware of the treatment allocation. Outcome measures included sensory and affective pain diary reports averaged over days and weeks, self-reported benefit and the General Health Questionnaire. Analysis of variance with repeated measures over time was used to find out if the active treatment had a specific effect, incremental to the placebo effect. There were no significant differences between the active and placebo groups over time. According to the pain diary reports, both active and placebo groups tended to improve slightly during treatment, but worsened after its withdrawal. Patients who were given the placebo application tended to report more benefit than those who had the active treatment, although this did not quite reach statistical significance (P < 0.06). Patients who were not on a waiting list for surgery did significantly better over time than those who were (P < 0.03). There were no significant differences between the groups over time for the other outcome variables. Any treatment effect on this patient population appears to have been largely placebo-mediated. No evidence was found therefore for the specific effectiveness of PSW for treatment of osteoarthritic hip or knee pain.

Affect↗

PubMed1988

The mechanism of the psychophysiological effects of placebo.

The psychological and physiological components of the placebo phenomenon are connected in a way which is analogous to the connection between thermal imagery and skin blood flow and skin temperature. The content of mental imagery affects specifically skin blood flow and causes temperature changes. By analogy, the physiological effects of placebo depend on the content of the patient's treatment-related imagery. The long term effects of placebo in a specific disease depend on the duration and repetition of a single placebo effect. Placebo affects through a complicated and holistic psychophysiological system. Therefore its effect can be more long-lasting than the effects of more specific agents. Thus placebo should be used intentionally together with treatments and drugs which have more direct physiological and pharmacological effects.

Humans↗

PubMed2005

Comparison of oral and vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening before manual vacuum aspiration of first trimester pregnancy under local anesthesia: a randomized placebo-controlled study.

The objective of this prospective randomized placebo-controlled study was to determine the effectiveness of 400 mug oral and 400 mug vaginal misoprostol administration for cervical priming 3 h prior to manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) under local anesthesia for voluntary termination of pregnancy before 10 weeks of gestation in comparison with placebo oral or placebo vaginal administration (n=40 in each group). Postmedication cervical dilatation was similar in the oral (mean, 6.6+/-1.5) and vaginal (mean, 7.2+/-0.8) misoprostol groups but significantly higher compared with the oral (mean, 3.4+/-0.2) and vaginal (mean, 3.6+/-1.9) placebo groups. Duration of the procedure was also significantly shorter in the misoprostol groups in comparison with their placebo counterparts. Preoperative bleeding and side effects were more common in the misoprostol groups, but none required medical intervention. Intraoperative bleeding was less in the vaginal misoprostol group compared with the placebo groups. There was no significant difference in terms of visual analogue scores during the procedure, patient satisfaction, days of postoperative bleeding and rate of postoperative complications among the groups. Cervical priming with misoprostol administered orally or vaginally 3 h before MVA for termination of pregnancy under local anesthesia facilitates the procedure by decreasing the need for cervical dilatation and by shortening its duration without improving patients' pain perception and satisfaction mainly due to side effects.

Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal↗

PubMed2005

Double-blind, placebo-controlled pharmacodynamic studies with a nutraceutical and a pharmaceutical dose of ademetionine (SAMe) in elderly subjects, utilizing EEG mapping and psychometry.

In a double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study, the effects of S-adenosyl-l-methionine (SAMe) on brain function measures of 12 normal elderly volunteers (6 m/6 f, aged 57-73 years, mean: 61 years) were investigated by means of EEG mapping and psychometry. In random order, the subjects were orally administered a pharmaceutical dose of 1600 mg SAMe, a nutraceutical dose of 400 mg SAMe and placebo, each over a period of 15 days, with wash-out periods of 2 weeks in between. EEG recordings, psychometric tests and evaluations of tolerability and side effects were carried out 0, 1, 3 and 6 h after drug administration on days 1 and 15. Multivariate analysis based on MANOVA/Hotelling T2 tests of quantitative EEG data demonstrated significant central effects of SAMe as compared with placebo after acute, subacute and superimposed drug administration of both the nutraceutical and the pharmaceutical dose. EEG changes induced by SAMe were characterized by an increase in total power, a decrease in absolute and relative power in the delta/theta and slow alpha frequencies, an increase in absolute and relative power in the alpha-2 and beta frequencies as well as an acceleration of the alpha centroid and the centroid of the total power spectrum. The delta/theta and the beta centroid showed variable changes over time. The dominant alpha frequency was accelerated, the absolute and relative power in the dominant alpha frequency attenuated after SAMe as compared with placebo. These acute and subacute pharmaco-EEG findings in elderly subjects are typical of activating antidepressants. Time-efficacy calculations showed that acute oral administration of SAMe in both the nutraceutical and the pharmaceutical dose induced the pharmacodynamic peak effect in the first hour with a subsequent decline. The 3rd and 6th hours still showed a significant encephalotropic effect after the 1600 mg dose. The maximum EEG effect was noted after 2 weeks of oral administration of both 1600 mg/die and 400 mg/die. The superimposed dose induced significant encephalotropic effects in the 3rd hour after 400 mg and in the 3rd and 6th hours after 1600 mg as compared with pre-treatment. Dose-efficacy calculations showed that the pharmaceutical dose of 1600 mg had a more pronounced effect on the CNS than the nutraceutical dose of 400 mg, with both doses being superior to placebo. Psychometric tests concerning noopsychic and thymopsychic measures as well as critical flicker fusion frequency generally demonstrated a lack of differences between SAMe and placebo, which reflects a good tolerability of the drug in elderly subjects. This was corroborated by the findings on side effects, pulse and blood pressure.

Aged↗

PubMed2006

Placebo surgery research: a blinding imperative.

In placebo surgery research, intervention group subjects receive a real surgical procedure, and control subjects receive a sham surgical procedure. The sham procedure is designed to recapitulate enough of the real procedure to blind participants to group assignment. Placebo surgery designs are used to control for placebo effects, and to eliminate the bias that might result if participants and investigators were aware of group assignment when outcomes are measured. In placebo surgery studies, in which participants are placed at increased risk to achieve the scientific validity provided by blinding, it is imperative that the blind be maintained, and maintainable, to justify putting subjects at risk to achieve it. In circumstances in which the outcome assessors are not fully blinded, or in which the intervention is not amenable to rigorous blinding, placebo surgery studies are not ethical. Investigators doing placebo surgery trials should obtain data on the integrity of the blind from both subjects and outcome assessors, to inform the validity of the results and to provide input for "blindability" decisions involving future trials.

Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic↗

PubMed2005

A randomized placebo controlled trial of ranitidine versus sucralfate in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage for prevention of gastric hemorrhage.

AIM: Due of paucity of studies on stress ulcer prophylaxis in intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), we have evaluated the usefulness of ranitidine and sucralfate in preventing gastric hemorrhage (GH) in patients with ICH. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In a hospital-based randomized placebo-controlled study, patients with CT-proven ICH within 7 days of ictus were randomized into ranitidine 50 mg i.v. eight hourly, sucralfate 1 g six hourly and placebo groups. Patients were conservatively managed. Primary endpoint was occurrence of GH within 15 days of ictus and secondary endpoint 1-month mortality. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 57.2 (range 25-90) years and 40 were females. There were 45 patients in ranitidine, 49 in sucralfate and 47 in placebo group. Demographic, clinical and radiological features were not significantly different in 3 groups. GH occurred in 11 (23.4%) patients in placebo, 5 (11.1%) in ranitidine and 7 (14.3%) in sucralfate group, which was not significant. Only one female had GH. There were 13 (27.7%) deaths in placebo, 5 (11.1%) in ranitidine and 12 (24.5%) in sucralfate group. Pneumonia occurred in placebo group in 5 (10.6%), ranitidine in 2 (4.4%) and sucralfate in 5 (10.2%) patients, which was not significantly different. CONCLUSION: Ranitidine and sucralfate do not seem to significantly prevent GH or reduce 1-month mortality.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Efficacy and safety of OPANA ER (oxymorphone extended release) for relief of moderate to severe chronic low back pain in opioid-experienced patients: a 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

UNLABELLED: Opioid-experienced (N = 250) patients with chronic, moderate to severe low back pain (LBP) were converted from their prestudy opioid(s) to an approximately equianalgesic dose of OPANA ER (oxymorphone extended release). Patients continued slow titration, with 56% stabilized within 1 month to a dose of OPANA ER that reduced average pain to <40 mm on a visual analog scale with good tolerability. Stabilized patients (n = 143) were randomized to placebo or their stabilized dose of OPANA ER every 12 hours for a 12-week double-blind period. Pain intensity increased significantly more for patients randomized to placebo than for patients who continued their stabilized dose of OPANA ER; the increase from baseline (at randomization) to final visit was 31.6 mm for placebo versus 8.7 mm with OPANA ER (P < .0001). During double-blind treatment, placebo patients were approximately 8-fold more likely than OPANA ER patients to discontinue because of lack of efficacy (P < .001). Discontinuations as a result of adverse events were similar between groups, 10% with placebo and 11% with OPANA ER. Opioid-related adverse events included constipation (6%), somnolence (3%), and nausea (3%). Fifty-seven percent of opioid-experienced patients with chronic, moderate to severe LBP achieved a stable dose of OPANA ER that was efficacious and generally well-tolerated for up to 12 weeks. PERSPECTIVE: In a 12-week, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in opioid-experienced patients with chronic, moderate to severe LBP, OPANA ER provided efficacious, long-term analgesia and was generally well-tolerated. OPANA ER may provide clinicians with a new treatment option for patients experiencing suboptimal analgesic responses or poor tolerability with other opioids.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Onset of action for duloxetine 60 mg once daily: double-blind, placebo-controlled studies.

BACKGROUND: It is widely believed that most antidepressant medications exhibit a delay of 2-4 weeks before clinically relevant improvement can be observed among patients. During this latency period, patients continue to be symptomatic and functionally impaired. Thus, time to onset of effect is an important attribute of a new pharmacotherapy. We assessed the onset of effect for duloxetine, utilizing analytical methods previously recommended in the literature. METHOD: Efficacy data were pooled from two identical, but independent, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 9-week clinical trials of duloxetine (60 mg QD). Efficacy measures included the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD(17)), HAMD(17) subscales (Maier, core, and anxiety), and the Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) and Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) scales. In each individual study, duloxetine demonstrated statistically significant advantages over placebo on multiple outcomes. The present analysis utilized pooled data to more accurately and fully characterize the onset of effect for duloxetine. RESULTS: Median times to sustained improvements of 10% and 20% in the HAMD(17) total score among duloxetine-treated patients were 14 days and 21 days, respectively, compared with 34 days and 49 days, respectively, for placebo-treated patients (p < 0.001 for both results). The median time to sustained 30% improvement in HAMD(17) total score was 35 days for duloxetine-treated patients, while the median time for placebo-treated patients was not estimable since less than half of the patients met this criterion by the end of the trial. For duloxetine-treated patients, median times to sustained 10%, 20%, and 30% improvements on the Maier subscale of the HAMD(17) were the same as those for the HAMD(17) total score: 14, 21, and 35 days, respectively. However, in other analyses, changes in core emotional symptoms as measured by subscales of the HAMD(17) were somewhat faster than changes in overall symptomatology. The probabilities of achieving a sustained 30% improvement (Maier subscale) at Week 1 for duloxetine- and placebo-treated patients were 16.2% vs. 4.8%, respectively (p < 0.001). The corresponding probabilities of sustained improvement at Weeks 2 and 3 for duloxetine were 32.5% and 45.4%, respectively, compared to 12.8% and 21.4% for placebo ((p < 0.001 for both comparisons). CONCLUSION: The absence of an active comparator limits the conclusions which can be drawn regarding the rapidity of onset of clinically meaningful improvement. However, results from the present investigation may be useful to clinicians in consideration of treatment options for individual patients.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed2006

Effect of oral acamprosate on abstinence in patients with alcohol dependence in a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial: the role of patient motivation.

This is the first US study to evaluate the clinical efficacy of acamprosate (Campral), a newly FDA-approved medication for maintaining abstinence in patients with alcohol dependence following alcohol withdrawal. We compared effects of the standard 2 g dose (n=258) and an exploratory 3 g dose of acamprosate (n=83) versus placebo (n=260), and evaluated drug safety in a double-blind, placebo-controlled 6-month trial conducted in 21 outpatient clinics across the US. Participants were 601 volunteers with current alcohol dependence recruited primarily by advertisement. All patients concomitantly received eight sessions of brief manual-guided counseling (www.alcoholfree.info). The main outcome measure was the percentage of alcohol-free days over the 6-month study. Self-report was validated by breath alcohol concentration, gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) and collateral informant interviews. The percentage of abstinent days did not differ significantly across groups in a priori analysis (54.3% for placebo, 56.1% for 2 g, 60.7% for 3 g). Post-hoc analysis controlling for baseline variables and treatment exposure found acamprosate was associated with a significantly higher percentage of abstinent days than placebo (52.3% for placebo, 58.2% for 2 g, 62.7% for 3 g; P=0.01), with an even greater effect in the subgroup of 241 patients having a baseline goal of abstinence (58.1% for placebo, 70.0% for 2 g, 72.5% for 3 g; P=0.02). There were no deaths or serious drug-related adverse events. The US study findings suggest that acamprosate is safe and well tolerated in a broadly inclusive sample of alcoholics and appears effective in populations of patients motivated to have a treatment goal of abstinence.

Acamprosate↗

PubMed2006

Effects of expectation on the brain metabolic responses to methylphenidate and to its placebo in non-drug abusing subjects.

The response to drugs is affected by expectation, which in turn is sensitive to prior drug experiences. Here, we evaluate the effects of expectation on the responses to intravenous methylphenidate (0.5 mg/kg) in fifteen subjects who had minimal experience with stimulant drugs. We used positron emission tomography to measure brain glucose metabolism, which we used as a marker of brain function and tested them under four randomized conditions (1) expecting placebo and receiving placebo; (2) expecting placebo and receiving methylphenidate; (3) expecting methylphenidate and receiving methylphenidate; (4) expecting methylphenidate and receiving placebo. We show that methylphenidate-induced decreases in striatum were greater when subjects expected to receive methylphenidate than when they were not expecting it. We also show that the subjects' expectations affected their responses to placebo. That is, when subjects expected to receive methylphenidate but received placebo there were significant increases in ventral cingulate gyrus (BA 25) and nucleus accumbens (regions involved with emotional reactivity and reward). The effect was largest in subjects who, because of experimental randomization, had not experienced methylphenidate. Because subjects were told that methylphenidate could be experienced as pleasant, unpleasant or devoid of subjective effects these results suggest the involvement of the ventral cingulate and of the nucleus accumbens in processing expectation for "uncertain drug effects". Thus, the state of expectation needs to be considered as a variable modulating the reinforcing and therapeutic effects of drugs even in subjects who have no prior experience with the drug.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

A new measure of placebo response and patient satisfaction in office encounters.

OBJECTIVES: Placebo response is defined as a change in health status resulting from the symbolic significance attributed by the patient or proxy to the physician encounter. Our goals were to validate the PR12 survey as a measure of placebo response and to analyze the placebo response as a discrete and measurable component of everyday office encounters with the otolaryngologist. STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective, before-and-after clinical outcomes study of 95 children aged 6 months to 12 years conducted in an academic metropolitan pediatric otolaryngology practice. Caregivers completed the PR-12 survey at entry and at least 4 weeks later. The survey included 3 domains (4 questions each) reflecting the main components of the placebo response: meaningful explanation, care and concern, and mastery and control. PR-12 was correlated with longitudinal change in health status at least 1 to 2 months after the baseline visit. Outcome measures included direct and indirect measures of change in disease-specific quality of life and satisfaction with change. RESULTS: Test-retest reliability was fair for most PR-12 survey items (R = 0.41 to 0.76) but was higher for domains (0.60 to 0.66) and the overall survey score (0.66). PR-12 had excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha 0.91) and appropriate construct validity. Caregiver satisfaction change at follow-up correlated with the PR-12 (r = -.25, P = 0.036). Conversely, no correlation was seen between the PR-12 and direct and indirect measures of change in disease specific quality of life. CONCLUSION: Placebo response is an important and potentially measurable aspect of clinical encounters. PR-12 is a promising first step at creating a brief, reliable, and valid instrument to assess the placebo response. SIGNIFICANCE: Reemphasizing the therapeutic potential of the doctor-patient relationship may improve quality of care and disease outcomes.

Child↗

PubMed2004

Treatment of painful temporomandibular joints with a cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor: a randomized placebo-controlled comparison of celecoxib to naproxen.

To compare the efficacy and adverse effects of celecoxib, a cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor, with naproxen, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, and placebo in the treatment of painful temporomandibular joints (TMJs). In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 68 subjects with painful TMJs secondary to disc-displacement with reduction, received celecoxib 100 mg twice a day; naproxen, 500 mg twice a day; or placebo for 6 weeks. Subjects were evaluated with standard measures of efficacy: pain intensity measured by visual analogue scale, maximal comfortable mandibular opening, and quality of life (SF-36), at baseline (1 week after discontinuing previous analgesic therapy) and again after 6 weeks of drug treatment. Naproxen significantly reduced the symptoms of painful temporomandibular joint disc-displacement (TMJ DD) with reduction as determined by most efficacy measures. Significant improvement in pain intensity occurred within 3 weeks of treatment, and was sustained throughout the 6-week study. Clinically significant improvement in mandibular range of motion was observed for naproxen compared to celecoxib and placebo. Celecoxib showed slightly better pain reduction than placebo, but was not significantly effective for temporomandibular disorder pain. Celecoxib and naproxen were well tolerated, with similar number of reported adverse effects. Dual COX-1 and COX-2 inhibition with naproxen was demonstrated to be effective for the treatment of painful TMJs, as seen by significant improvement in clinical signs and symptoms of TMJ DD with reduction compared to celecoxib and placebo. Inhibition of both COX isozymes is needed to achieve effective analgesia for this type of musculoskeletal pain.

Adult↗

PubMed1993

Quality of life of postmenopausal women on a regimen of transdermal estradiol therapy: a double-blind placebo-controlled study.

OBJECTIVE: The effect of transdermal estradiol and placebo therapy on the quality of life of postmenopausal women was compared in a randomized trial over 12 weeks. STUDY DESIGN: Two hundred forty-two women were randomized, and 223 were analyzed for efficacy (n = 112 for estradiol and n = 111 for placebo). The quality of life was assessed by means of a battery of standard questionnaires. RESULTS: Quality of life improved after both therapies, but health-related quality of life (p = 0.0003) and well being (p = 0.003) improved more after transdermal estradiol therapy than after placebo. This was also the case for all specific climacteric aspects, including sexual problems (p < 0.0001) and dysfunction (p = 0.01), at comparison with placebo. Self-rated symptom relief was more pronounced with estrogen therapy than with placebo (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: It was concluded that estradiol therapy was superior to placebo in relieving symptoms and improving quality of life.

Administration, Cutaneous↗

PubMed2000

Placebo effect in randomized, controlled maintenance studies of patients with bipolar disorder.

The prevention of mood episodes is an important goal of the maintenance treatment of patients with bipolar disorder. The rate of relapse on placebo compared with that on active treatment is an important issue in the design of future clinical trials of maintenance treatment. We examine the range and time course of placebo relapse rates in studies of patients with bipolar I disorder. In addition, we address the potential variables associated with placebo response, strategies to minimize placebo response, the optimum duration of placebo-controlled maintenance trials, possible alternatives to placebo control groups, and the impact of these considerations in maintenance studies of children, adolescents, and older adults with bipolar disorder.

Acute Disease↗