Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Motion”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,405 records · Page 78Linked to original sources
PubMed2001

Motion processing in the auditory cortex of the rufous horseshoe bat: role of GABAergic inhibition.

This study examined the influence of inhibition on motion-direction-sensitive responses of neurons in the dorsal fields of auditory cortex of the rufous horseshoe bat. Responses to auditory apparent motion stimuli were recorded extracellularly from neurons while microiontophoretically applying gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and the GABAA receptor antagonist bicuculline methiodide (BMI). Neurons could respond with a directional preference exhibiting stronger responses to one direction of motion or a shift of receptive field (RF) borders depending on direction of motion. BMI influenced the motion direction sensitivity of 53% of neurons. In 21% of neurons the motion-direction sensitivity was decreased by BMI by decreasing either directional preference or RF shift. In neurons with a directional preference, BMI increased the spike number for the preferred direction by a similar amount as for the nonpreferred direction. Thus, inhibition was not direction specific. BMI increased motion-direction sensitivity by either increasing directional preference or magnitude of RF shifts in 22% of neurons. Ten percent of neurons changed their response from a RF shift to a directional preference under BMI. In these neurons, the observed effects could often be better explained by adaptation of excitation rather than inhibition. The results suggest, that adaptation of excitation, as well as cortex specific GABAergic inhibition, contribute to motion-direction sensitivity in the auditory cortex of the rufous horseshoe bat.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed2002

Direction-specific motion blindness induced by focal stimulation of human extrastriate cortex.

Motion blindness (MB) or akinetopsia is the selective disturbance of visual motion perception while other features of the visual scene such as colour and shape are normally perceived. Chronic and transient forms of MB are characterized by a global deficit of direction discrimination (pandirectional), which is generally assumed to result from damage to, or interference with, the motion complex MT+/V5. However, the most characteristic feature of primate MT-neurons is not their motion specificity, but their preference for one direction of motion (direction specificity). Here, we report that focal electrical stimulation in the human posterior temporal lobe selectively impaired the perception of motion in one direction while the perception of motion in other directions was completely normal (unidirectional MB). In addition, the direction of MB was found to depend on the brain area stimulated. It is argued that direction specificity for visual motion is not only represented at the single neuron level, but also in much larger cortical units.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Intrafractional tumor motion: lung and liver.

Three-dimensional (3D) dose distribution has been improved by 3D conformation and intensity modulation in external radiotherapy. Interfractional uncertainty has been reduced by image-guided setup techniques. Reduction of ambiguity because of intrafractional target motion is the next step forward. Respiratory organ motion is known to be the largest intrafractional organ motion. Radiotherapy techniques controlling, gating, or tracking respiratory motion are under investigation to use smaller safety margins and higher doses for moving tumors. However, data on intrafractional tumor motion are sparse. We developed a fluoroscopic real-time tracking system and implantation techniques of fiducial markers for moving organs and have been accumulating knowledge about internal tumor motion. We also found the importance of 4-dimensional treatment planning to account for tumor motion in precision radiotherapy. This article reviews the current basic knowledge on respiratory physiology and summarizes the accumulating knowledge on internal motion of lung and liver tumors.

Fluoroscopy↗
PubMed2002

A rigid body model of the dynamic posteroanterior motion response of the human lumbar spine.

BACKGROUND: Clinicians apply posteroanterior (PA) forces to the spine for both mobility assessment and certain spinal mobilization and manipulation treatments. Commonly applied forces include low-frequency sinusoidal oscillations (<2 Hz) as used in mobilization, single haversine thrusts (<0.5 seconds) as imparted in high-velocity, low-amplitude (HVLA) manipulation, or very rapid impulsive thrusts (<5 ms) such as those delivered in mechanical-force, manually-assisted (MFMA) manipulation. Little is known about the mechanics of these procedures. Reliable methods are sought to obtain an adequate understanding of the force-induced displacement response of the lumbar spine to PA forces. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to investigate the kinematic response of the lumbar spine to static and dynamic PA forces. DESIGN: A 2-dimensional modal analysis was performed to predict the dynamic motion response of the lumbar spine. METHODS: A 5-degree-of-freedom, lumped equivalent model was developed to predict the PA motion of the lumbar spine. Lumbar vertebrae were modeled as masses, massless-spring, and dampers, and the resulting equations of motion were solved by using a modal analysis approach. The sensitivity of the model to variations in the spring stiffness and damping coefficients was examined, and the model validity was determined by comparing the results to oscillatory and impulsive force measurements of vertebral motion associated with spine mobilization and 2 forms of spinal manipulation. RESULTS: Model predictions, based on a damping ratio of 0.15 (moderate damping) and PA spring stiffness coefficient ranging from 25 to 60 kN/m, showed good agreement with in vivo human studies. Quasi-static and low-frequency (<2.0 Hz) forces at L3 produced L3 segmental and L3-L4 intersegmental displacements up to 8.1 mm and 3.0 mm, respectively. PA oscillatory motions were over 2.5-fold greater for oscillatory forces applied at the natural frequency. Impulsive forces produced much lower segmental displacements in comparison to static and oscillatory forces. Differences in intersegmental displacements resulting from impulsive, static, and oscillatory forces were much less remarkable. The latter suggests that intersegmental motions produced by spinal manipulation may play a prominent role in eliciting therapeutic responses. CONCLUSIONS: The simple analytical model presented in this study can be used to predict the static, cyclic, and impulsive force PA displacement response of the lumbar spine. The model provides data on lumbar segmental and intersegmental motion patterns that are otherwise difficult to obtain experimentally. Modeling of the PA motion response of the lumbar spine to PA forces assists in the understanding the biomechanics of therapeutic PA forces applied to the lumbar spine and may ultimately be used to validate chiropractic technique procedures and minimize risk to patients receiving spinal manipulative therapy.

Biomechanical Phenomena↗
PubMed1985

A revised analysis of the role of efference in motion perception.

The analysis of motion perception historically has included efferent as well as afferent mechanisms to account for the perception of motion during eye movement. The application of efferent mechanisms to motion perception has been limited, however, by several illusions which are apparently inconsistent with the notion that oculomotor mechanisms contribute to motion perception. An alternative account is presented of the manner in which efference may contribute to the perception of motion. It is proposed that distinct smooth eye-movement systems contribute differentially to object motion perception. Specifically, activity in the smooth pursuit system gives rise to the perception of object motion, whereas activity in the smooth component of reflexive eye movements does not. Tracking of a moving object results in object motion perception as a result of efference in the pursuit system. However, the pursuit system may be activated to oppose the smooth component of reflexive eye movements in order to preserve fixation on a stationary object. In such cases neither the fixated object nor the eye is moving but illusory movement results from the efference in the pursuit system. A number of illusory movement phenomena are interpreted in terms of this model.

Eye Movements↗
PubMed1986

Induced motion considered as a visually induced oculogyral illusion.

The possibility that nystagmus suppression contributes to illusory motion was investigated by measuring perceived motion of a stationary stimulus following the removal of an optokinetic stimulus. This was done because optokinetic nystagmus typically outlasts cessation of an optokinetic stimulus. Therefore, it would be expected that a stationary fixated stimulus should appear to move after removal of an optokinetic stimulus if illusory motion results from nystagmus suppression. Illusory motion was reported for a stationary fixation target following optokinetic stimulation. This motion was reported first in the same direction as the preceding induced motion, then in the opposite direction. The two directions of illusory motion following optokinetic stimulation are interpreted as resulting from the use of smooth ocular pursuit to suppress first one phase of optokinetic after nystagmus and then the reverse phase. Implications for the origins of induced motion are discussed.

Fixation, Ocular↗
PubMed1987

Observations on stroboscopic induced motion.

Subject-relative explanations of motion induction state that induced motion is the result of a misperceived shift of the median plane of the visual field of the subject. This theory does not require relative motion of the spot and frame, in the classical spot-and-frame condition, only asymmetrical stimulation. Three experiments are reported in which stroboscopic induced motion was investigated. The experimental arrangement was unconventional in that the induced object (spot) was presented only during the interstimulus interval between the exposures of the inducing object (frame). This allowed differentiation of the duration of the induced movement and that of the inducing one. In the first experiment it was demonstrated that perception of induced motion depends upon the duration of the interstimulus interval between the presentations of the inducing frame. In the second experiment it was shown that the perceived velocity of the induced movement can be different from that of the inducing one and depends on the duration of exposure of the induced object. In the third experiment a stimulus display was created in which the apparent displacement of an object and its induced motion are incongruous. The results are incompatible with subject-relative displacement as the sole determining factor of motion induction and they present some difficulties for the hypothesis that induced motion is the result of the apportionment of the objective displacement of the frame.

Adult↗
PubMed1988

Perceptions of depth elicited by occluded and shearing motions of random dots.

A computer-controlled display of random dots was used to study perceptions of depth. In this display, a field of stationary random dots surrounded a rectangular area in which random dots moved with uniform velocity in a single direction. The boundaries of this rectangle did not move. When dot motion was perpendicular to the longer boundary of the rectangle (occluded motion), the rectangle seemed to be behind the stationary background surround. Motion parallel to the longer boundary of the rectangle (shearing motion) made it appear in front of the surround. The relative lengths of the sides of the rectangle determined which effect predominated. Thus, for motion perpendicular to the long axis of the rectangle the occlusion predominated and naive subjects reported that the central area seemed farther away than the surround. For shearing motion parallel to the long axis, the subjects reported that the rectangle was closer than the surround and the strength of both effects also depended on the length-to-width ratio of the rectangle. If there was occluded motion along the long axis, as the length-to-width ratio increased so did the likelihood that subjects would report seeing the rectangle behind the surround. Conversely, with shearing motion along the long axis, increasing the length-to-width ratio increased the likelihood that the rectangle would appear unambiguously in front of the surround. Some subjects integrated the two cues with the resulting perception being a rotating cylinder. The occlusion effect was stronger than the shearing effect.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Acceleration↗
PubMed1989

Measuring attention using induced motion.

Attention was measured by means of its effect upon induced motion. Perceived horizontal motion was induced in a vertically moving test spot by the physical horizontal motion of inducing objects. All stimuli were in a frontoparallel plane. The induced motion vectored with the physical motion to produce a clockwise or counterclockwise tilt in the apparent path of motion of the test spot. Either a single inducing object or two inducing objects moving in opposite directions were used. Twelve observers were instructed to attend to or to ignore the single inducing object while fixating the test object and, when the two opposing inducing objects were present, to attend to one inducing object while ignoring the other. Tracking of the test spot was visually monitored. The tilt of the path of apparent motion of the test spot was measured by tactile adjustment of a comparison rod. It was found that the measured tilt was substantially larger when the single inducing object was attended rather than ignored. For the two inducing objects, attending to one while ignoring the other clearly increased the effectiveness of the attended inducing object. The results are analyzed in terms of the distinction between voluntary and involuntary attention. The advantages of measuring attention by its effect on induced motion as compared with the use of a precueing procedure, and a hypothesis regarding the role of attention in modifying perceived spatial characteristics are discussed.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

The perceived strength of motion-defined edges.

Performance on visual tasks involving the use of motion-defined contours is likely to depend on stimulus strength, but presently there are no empirical or experimental assessments of motion-defined contour strength. Therefore, a matching method was used to estimate the strength of suprathreshold motion-defined edges on a luminance-contrast scale. The perceived strength of a motion-defined contour was expressed as an equivalent luminance contrast; this allowed the use of a single scale which accommodates diverse motion-defined stimuli. Motion-defined edge strength estimated in this manner was an inverted U-shaped function of dot density and dot velocity, and spanned at least a fivefold range of edge strengths. For one observer, maximum motion-defined edge strength was equivalent to 79% luminance contrast, at least thirteen times the contrast detection threshold. The results are interpreted via a simple two-stage model for perceiving motion-defined edges.

Contrast Sensitivity↗
PubMed1994

Perception of motion in depth from luminous rotating spirals: directional asymmetries during and after rotation.

Motion aftereffect (MAE) following spiral rotation is often asymmetrical: centrifugal MAE exceeds centripetal MAE. Pronounced MAE asymmetry has been reported for conditions--especially with a minimal background pattern--promoting perception of motion in depth. Such conditions are predicted to elicit motion asymmetry during adaptation. In the present study observers viewed luminous spirals monocularly in the dark; they timed, and scaled for convincingness, motion in depth during and after rotation. Motion in depth during rotation was often almost continuous, but recession was more convincing than was approach. Approaching MAE lasted longer and was more convincing than was receding MAE: the duration difference was more pronounced than has been found in other MAE studies, corroborating the link between MAE asymmetry and motion in depth. A possible line of explanation resides in comparing spiral motion in depth with real motion in depth of objects: in particular, the rapid visual change and collision with the observer that characterises real approach of an object is lacking in spiral approach. Interspecies differences for 'looming' and MAE are discussed.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Intraattribute and interattribute motion induction.

The phenomenon of motion induction occurs, for example, when a bar that is presented next to a spot, which itself was presented slightly earlier, is not correctly perceived to appear everywhere simultaneously, but seems to grow out of the spot. The spot is said to prime one end of the bar. Experiments have been designed to throw more light on the local and global aspects of this phenomenon, in particular to establish whether this illusory motion percept can be observed when the spot and the bar stimuli are defined with respect to the background by one of a variety of attributes, such as luminance, color, stereodepth (crossed and uncrossed), texture, and motion (start and stop). It was found that all attribute combinations supported motion induction readily, but that the strength of the perceived motion (as measured by magnitude estimation) varied and depended more on the attribute defining the bar than on the attribute of the spot. Luminance and color gave the most vivid effects, whereas motion and depth showed the least vivid effects. The influence of the amount of luminance and color contrast on the strength of the effect was also determined and it was found that these variables affected motion induction most at very low contrast levels close to detection threshold. It is concluded that the illusory motion in this effect depends only slightly on the particular visual attribute channel that carries the stimulus information. This is consistent with the contention that it is a high-level, attention-related effect, phenomenologically similar to polarized gamma movement.

Attention↗
PubMed1994

Auditory aftereffects following simulated motion produced by varying interaural intensity or time.

Simulated auditory motion, ie step-ramp modulated interaural intensity (delta I) or time (delta t) was presented via headphones as an adapting stimulus (narrow-band signal of 1 kHz mean frequency). After adaptation, settings of a stationary test stimulus were systematically shifted in the opposite direction when the experimental parameter was delta I, but not when it was delta t. Further studies with delta t motion with the use of mean frequencies of 100 Hz or 6 kHz showed an aftereffect only at 6 kHz. Unlike visual motion aftereffects, no counter-motion was observed; rather the test stimulus appeared stationary, but settings of its interaural midline were displaced in a direction opposite to the direction of adaptation (on average by 1.2 dB or 30 microseconds for delta I-stimulated and delta t-stimulated motion, respectively). This displacement effect decayed with time after adaptation. The frequency dependence found for delta t motion suggests that the low-frequency mechanism of directional hearing that uses interaural ongoing-time (phase) differences is not able to adapt. The observed auditory aftereffects may be analogous to visual motion aftereffects since they are direction specific; however, because they lack apparent motion they also resemble disparity-specific stereoscopic aftereffects.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1995

Does motion perception follow Weber's law?

The subjective strength of a percept often depends on the stimulus intensity in a nonlinear way. Such coding is often reflected by the observation that the just-noticeable difference between two stimulus intensities (JND) is proportional to the absolute stimulus intensity. This behaviour, which is usually referred to as Weber's Law, can be interpreted as a compressive nonlinearity extending the operating range of a sensory system. When the noise superimposed on a motion stimulus is increased along a logarithmic scale (in order to provide linear steps in subjective difference) in motion-coherency measurements, observers often report that the subjective differences between the various noise levels increase together with the absolute level. This observation could indicate a deviation from Weber's Law for variation of motion strength as obtained by changing the signal-to-noise ratio in random-dot kinematograms. Thus JNDs were measured for the superposition of uncorrelated random-dot patterns on static random-dot patterns and three types of motion stimuli realised as random-dot kinematograms, namely large-field and object 'Fourier' motion (all or a group of dots move coherently), 'drift-balanced' motion (a travelling region of static dots), and paradoxical 'theta' motion (the dots on the surface of an object move in opposite direction to the object itself). For all classes of stimuli, the JNDs when expressed as differences in signal-to-noise ratio turned out to increase with the signal-to-noise ratio, whereas the JNDs given as percentage of superimposed noise appear to be similar for all tested noise levels. Thus motion perception is in accordance with Weber's Law when the signal-to-noise ratio is regarded as stimulus intensity, which in turn appears to be coded in a nonlinear fashion. In general the Weber fractions are very large, indicating a poor differential sensitivity in signal-to-noise measurements.

Acceleration↗
PubMed1995

Evidence that luminant and equiluminant motion signals are integrated by directionally selective mechanisms.

Three experiments tested whether motion information for nonequiluminant (luminant) and equiluminant dots affects direction judgments when both types of stimuli are moving simultaneously in the same display. The motion directions for the two sets of dots were manipulated to produce four direction differences (0 degrees, 30 degrees, 60 degrees, and 90 degrees). The equiluminant dots were moved in a perfectly correlated fashion, but the percentage of correlated motion for the luminant dots was varied. When subjects judged whether the directions of the equiluminant and luminant dots were the same or different, performance for the conditions with 0 degrees, 60 degrees, and 90 degrees difference improved as the percentage of correlated luminant motion increased. The same result occurred for a control display that contained two sets of luminant dots. However, for the 30 degrees difference, performance was at chance level for the control display, but dropped below chance for the equiluminant-luminant display. When subjects indicated just the direction of the luminant dots, judgments were not affected by equiluminant motion. Judgments for the equiluminant dots also were accurate, except for the conditions with 30 degrees difference; these responses were biased by the luminant motion, indicating some form of motion capture. The interactive effects are discussed in terms of a directionally selective mechanism that combines equiluminant and luminant motion signals.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

The aftereffect to relative motion does not show interocular transfer.

The motion aftereffect is strongest after viewing a moving field embedded in a patterned stationary surround, which suggests that relative motion is an important signal for its generation. The contribution of relative motion to binocular aspects of the motion aftereffect was assessed. Subjects viewed uniformly moving random dots surrounded by a stationary random-dot annulus. These displays could be presented in a variety of combinations to each eye separately or to both eyes, during adaptation and test. It was found that, although the presence of relative motion during adaptation significantly extended the duration of the monocular motion aftereffect, it did not augment interocular transfer. The presence of stationary surround contours in the nonadapting eye did not influence the aftereffect in the adapting eye. The enhancement provided by stationary surround contours is largely dependent on their presence during adaptation. The presence or absence of surround contours during the test phase did not influence the duration of the aftereffect. These findings are consistent with previous suggestions that the motion aftereffect is, in part, the result of adaptation to relative motion that occurs relatively early in the visual pathway-before binocular integration.

Adaptation, Ocular↗
PubMed1997

Motion transparency in superimposed dense random-dot patterns: psychophysics and simulation.

To determine the mechanism underlying motion transparency, representative examples of motion transparency are listed and possible mechanisms are suggested. Those are feature tracking, multiple spatial-frequency channels, luminance-based transparency rules, and motion energy. Next, an interesting stimulus for motion transparency is introduced, namely superimposed dense random-dot patterns, which is not explained by feature tracking or multiple spatial-frequency channels. A psychophysical experiment reveals that the occurrence of motion transparency in this stimulus depends on three luminance levels assigned to three possible combinations of component dots: (1) white dots superimposed upon white dots, (2) white dots upon black dots, and (3) black dots upon black dots. However, physical rules of luminance-based transparency fail to explain the results. Finally, a computer simulation reveals that a computational model based on motion energy quantitatively predicts the human psychophysical performance. All the results support the idea that motion-energy detection followed by spatial integration is a likely candidate for the mechanism underlying motion transparency.

Computer Simulation↗
PubMed1999

Does binocular disparity facilitate the detection of transparent motion?

Recent physiological studies have established that cortical cells that are tuned for the direction of motion may also exhibit tuning for binocular disparity. This tuning does not appear to provide any advantage in discriminating the direction of global motion in random-dot kinematograms. Here we investigated the possibility that this tuning may be important in the perception of transparent motion. Random-dot kinematograms were presented which contained coherent motion in a single direction or in two opposing directions. A greater proportion of signal dots was required for the detection of transparent motion than of motion in a single direction. This difference vanished when the two opposite directions of motion were presented with different disparities. These results suggest that the direction of global motion can be computed separately for surfaces which are clearly segregated in depth.

Humans↗