PubMed2001
Mucosal immunity in the gastrointestinal (GI) tract is a primary defence against GI pathogens. We hypothesise that a mucosal response to lipopolysaccharide (LPS), especially to the common (core) determinants of GI pathogenic Escherichia coli strains, is protective. The aims of this study were to investigate the specificities, levels and development of humoral responses in health and GI disease to the R3 LPS core and O-polysaccharide of E. coli O157. The purpose was to try to predict whether vaccination or passive immunisation might induce protection. Wherever possible, paired whole gut lavage fluid (WGLF) and serum samples were collected for comparison of the mucosal and systemic responses. Matched saliva samples were also collected from some study groups. The patient groups included those with acute E. coli O157 disease (serum only), patients convalescing after E. coli O157 infections, and patients undergoing routine investigation for GI conditions but subsequently shown to be immunologically normal. Some samples of WGLF from patients with Crohn's disease (CRO) and ulcerative colitis (UC) were included to allow comparisons with patients with inflammatory conditions known to alter antibody secretion in the GI tract. The healthy groups from whom serum and saliva only were taken included blood donors, healthy volunteers and a group of slaughterhouse workers. This latter group was likely to have been exposed regularly to faecal bacteria from animals and antibody specificities might have been expected to be different from other healthy individuals. Levels and classes of antibodies were determined by ELISA with microtitration plates coated with polymyxin complexes of whole LPS extracted from E. coli O157 and LPS from the E. coli R3 rough mutant. Antibodies of IgG and IgM classes were measured in serum and IgA was measured in WGLF and saliva. IgG antibodies to the O157 LPS and the R3 core oligosaccharide were detected in the serum of healthy blood donors. Patients with acute E. coli O157 disease showed elevated levels of serum IgM to O157 LPS and R3, with IgG levels raised only to R3. In serum from convalescent patients, IgG to O157 LPS was significantly above the control groups only in the period 6-16 weeks after infection. Total IgA levels were similar in WGLF specimens from all groups, except the patients with UC, whose levels were much higher. Specific IgA levels were higher in the E. coli O157 convalescent group, but there were no significant correlations overall. UC patients had significantly lower levels of IgA to O157 and CRO patients had higher O157 IgA levels than UC patients and healthy volunteers. In serum, inhibition of ELISA showed that the response to the O157 LPS was due in part to a response to the R3 oligosaccharide component. This response was much more pronounced in the healthy and non-O157 groups than in convalescent patients. There was no correlation between specific IgA antibody levels in saliva and matched specimens of WGLF, and levels in sequential saliva specimens fluctuated widely. The significant IgG and IgA responses to the R3 core suggest that there is immunological memory to this oligosaccharide LPS component which may have a role in protection against E. coli LPS both systemically and locally in the GI tract. Boosting of this mucosal response to the LPS core, either naturally through exposure or by active or passive immunisation, may confer protection. Finally, antibody responses to E. coli O157 must be interpreted with caution, as the response detected is a sum of responses to the O-specific polysaccharide and the R3 core.