SEX-LINKED INHERITANCE AND THE PROBLEM OF LINKAGE.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · Search PubMed
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of structured questionnaire screening and prenatal urine toxicology for the detection of substance use by pregnant women, and to describe substance use patterns in a group of women presenting to a university-based obstetric clinic. METHODS: All patients presenting to our obstetric clinic for their first prenatal visit were evaluated for evidence of current use of alcohol or any illicit substances. Nursing personnel administered an extensive questionnaire, which included detailed questions about past and current substance use patterns. Urine samples were examined by a commercial laboratory for alcohol and a number of illicit substances. Current users were defined as those who admitted use within the past 30 days or who had positive urine toxicology. RESULTS: Fifty-eight of 302 patients (19.2%) were identified as current users of alcohol or illicit substances. Only 17 of 41 women (41.5%) with toxicologic evidence of recent use admitted to current use. Only 17 of 34 (50.0%) admitting to current use had toxicology positive for any substance. Patients with a history of multiple past substance use were significantly more likely to have positive urine toxicology than those without such a history (26.1 versus 7.4%; P < .005). Among current users, multiple substance use (34.5%) and cigarette smoking (52%) were common. CONCLUSION: A screening combination of structured questionnaire and universal urine toxicology identifies more current users than either technique alone, and neither is clearly superior to the other. A history of multiple substance use may be an important indicator of current use.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the addition of broad-spectrum antimicrobial therapy to traditional expectant management improves pregnancy outcome in patients with premature rupture of membranes (PROM) remote from term. METHODS: Patients with preterm PROM before 34 weeks' gestation who were not in labor and had no signs of infection or fetal distress were randomized to one of two study groups: 1) expectant management alone and 2) expectant management plus antimicrobial therapy. Women in the latter group received intravenous ampicillin, gentamicin, and clindamycin for 24 hours, followed by amoxicillin plus clavulanic acid orally for 7 days. Other than antibiotic use, management of the two groups was identical. RESULTS: Significantly more women (P < .01) treated with antibiotics (20 of 48, 42%) remained undelivered 7 days after admission compared with those managed expectantly without antibiotics (seven of 46, 15%). In addition, more neonates in the group managed with antibiotics were admitted to the routine nursery (nine of 48 versus two of 45; P = .03). However, there was no difference between the groups in the frequency of serious maternal or neonatal morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of broad-spectrum antimicrobial therapy to traditional expectant management of pregnancy complicated by preterm PROM may increase the number of gestations undelivered 7 days after admission. It may also decrease the proportion of infants admitted to special care nurseries. Whether these effects result in significant short- or long-term maternal or neonatal benefit remains to be determined.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.