Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Notch”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,387 records · Page 77Linked to original sources
PubMed2006

The notch ankyrin domain folds via a discrete, centralized pathway.

The Notch ankyrin repeat domain contains seven ankyrin sequence repeats, six of which adopt very similar structures. To determine if folding proceeds along parallel pathways and the order in which repeats become structured during folding, we examined the effect of analogous destabilizing Ala-->Gly substitutions in each repeat on folding kinetics. We find that folding proceeds to an on-pathway kinetic intermediate through a transition state ensemble containing structure in repeats three through five. Repeats two, six, and seven remain largely unstructured in this intermediate, becoming structured in a second kinetic step that leads to the native state. These data suggest that the Notch ankyrin domain folds according to a discrete kinetic pathway despite structural redundancy in the native state and highlight the importance of sequence-specific interactions in controlling pathway selection. This centralized pathway roughly corresponds to a low energy channel through the experimentally determined energy landscape.

Ankyrin Repeat↗
PubMed2005

beamter/deltaC and the role of Notch ligands in the zebrafish somite segmentation, hindbrain neurogenesis and hypochord differentiation.

The Tübingen large-scale zebrafish genetic screen completed in 1996 identified a set of five genes required for orderly somite segmentation. Four of them have been molecularly identified and three were found to code for components of the Notch pathway, which are required for the coordinated oscillation of gene expression, known as the segmentation clock, in the presomitic mesoderm (PSM). Here, we show that the final member of the group, beamter (bea), codes for the Notch ligand DeltaC, and we present and characterize two new alleles, including one allele encoding for a protein truncated in the 7th EGF repeat and an allele deleting only the DSL domain which was previously shown to be necessary for ligand function. Interestingly however, when we over-express any of the mutant deltaC mRNAs, we observe antimorphic effects on both hindbrain neurogenesis and hypochord formation. Expression of bea/deltaC oscillates in the PSM, and a triple fluorescent in situ analysis of its oscillation in relation to that of other oscillating genes in the PSM reveals differences in subcellular localization of the oscillating mRNAs in individual cells in different oscillation phases. Mutations in aei/deltaD and bea/deltaC differ in the way they disrupt the oscillating expression of her1 and deltaC. Furthermore, we find that the double mutants have significantly stronger defects in hypochord formation but not in somitogenesis or hindbrain neurogenesis, indicating genetically that the two delta's may function either semi-redundantly or distinctly, depending upon context.

Alleles↗
PubMed2002

Limits of cooperativity in a structurally modular protein: response of the Notch ankyrin domain to analogous alanine substitutions in each repeat.

To determine the limits of cooperativity in a structurally modular protein, we characterized the structure and stability of glycine variants of the ankyrin repeat domain from the Drosophila melangaster Notch receptor. The substitutions are of analogous alanine residues to glycine in each repeat, and allow the same perturbation to be examined at different positions in the protein. The ankyrin domain is insensitive to substitution in repeat one, suggesting that the first repeat is not fully-folded. Glycine substitutions in repeat two through seven are strongly destabilizing, but the variants retain their overall secondary and tertiary structures. Spectroscopic and calorimetric data are consistent with two-state unfolding transitions for the repeat-two through repeat-five glycine variants, and for the wild-type protein. These data indicate that, despite its modular structure, the Notch ankyrin domain unfolds as a cooperative unit consisting of the six C-terminal repeats, and that this cooperativity is maintained in the presence of severely destabilizing substitutions in the N-terminal and central repeats. In contrast, glycine substitution in repeat six leads to a multi-state unfolding transition, suggesting that the coupling that gives rise to long-range cooperativity in the wild-type protein may have a weak link in the C-terminal region. Such behavior is captured by a simple statistical thermodynamic model in which an unstable C-terminal region is coupled to a stable N-terminal region through a strongly stabilizing interface.

Alanine↗
PubMed1998

Notch receptor activation inhibits oligodendrocyte differentiation.

In this study, we show that oligodendrocyte differentiation is powerfully inhibited by activation of the Notch pathway. Oligodendrocytes and their precursors in the developing rat optic nerve express Notch1 receptors and, at the same time, retinal ganglion cells express Jagged1, a ligand of the Notch1 receptor, along their axons. Jagged1 expression is developmentally regulated, decreasing with a time course that parallels myelination in the optic nerve. These results suggest that the timing of oligodendrocyte differentiation and myelination is controlled by the Notch pathway and raise the question of whether localization of myelination is controlled by this pathway.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

A Delta-Notch signaling border regulated by Engrailed/Invected repression specifies boundary cells in the Drosophila hindgut.

The Drosophila hindgut develops three morphologically distinct regions along its anteroposterior axis: small intestine, large intestine and rectum. Single-cell rings of 'boundary cells' delimit the large intestine from the small intestine at the anterior, and the rectum at the posterior. The large intestine also forms distinct dorsal and ventral regions; these are separated by two single-cell rows of boundary cells. Boundary cells are distinguished by their elongated morphology, high level of both apical and cytoplasmic Crb protein, and gene expression program. During embryogenesis, the boundary cell rows arise at the juxtaposition of a domain of Engrailed (En)- plus Invected (Inv)-expressing cells with a domain of Delta (Dl)-expressing cells. Analysis of loss-of-function and ectopic expression phenotypes shows that the domain of Dl-expressing cells is defined by En/Inv repression. Further, Notch pathway signaling, specifically the juxtaposition of Dl-expressing and Dl-non-expressing cells, is required to specify the rows of boundary cells. This Notch-induced cell specification is distinguished by the fact that it does not appear to utilize the ligand Serrate and the modulator Fringe.

Animals↗
PubMed1997

JAGGED2: a putative Notch ligand expressed in the apical ectodermal ridge and in sites of epithelial-mesenchymal interactions.

The Drosophila Notch gene and its ligands, Delta and Serrate, are involved in cell fate determination in a variety of developing tissues. Recently, several Notch, Delta and Serrate homologues have been identified in vertebrates. We report here the cloning of the human and murine JAGGED2 (JAG2), a Serrate-like gene, and the analysis of its expression pattern during embryogenesis. Jag2 was found to be expressed as early as E9 in the surface ectoderm of the branchial arches and in the apical ectodermal ridge (AER) of the developing limb. At E12.5, Jag2 expression is upregulated in differentiated neurons of the central and peripheral nervous system and in the inner neuroblastic layer of the developing retina. Outside the nervous system, Jag2 is expressed in the developing vibrissae follicles, tooth buds, thymus, submandibular gland and stomach. Our findings suggest the involvement of Jagged2 in the development of the mammalian limb, branchial arches, central and peripheral nervous systems and several tissues whose development depends upon epithelial-mesenchymal interactions.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Notch signaling in T cell development.

Notch signaling regulates cell fate decisions during development. Recent experiments suggest that Notch signaling is essential for initial commitment to the T cell lineage and may function together with signals from the pre-TCR and the TCR to regulate subsequent steps of T cell development.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

The notch signalling regulator fringe acts in the Golgi apparatus and requires the glycosyltransferase signature motif DXD.

BACKGROUND: Signalling via the Notch receptor is a key regulator of many developmental processes. The differential responsiveness of Notch-expressing cells to the ligands Delta and Serrate is controlled by Fringe, itself essential for normal patterning in Drosophila and vertebrates. The mechanism of Fringe action, however, is not known. The protein has an amino-terminal hydrophobic stretch resembling a cleaved signal peptide, which has led to the widespread assumption that it is a secreted signalling molecule. It also has distant homology to bacterial glycosyltransferases, although it is not clear if this reflects a shared enzymatic activity, or merely a related structure. RESULTS: We report that a functional epitope-tagged form of Drosophila Fringe was localised in the Golgi apparatus. When the putative signal peptide was replaced by a confirmed one, Fringe no longer accumulated in the Golgi, but was instead efficiently secreted. This change in localisation dramatically reduced its biological activity, implying that the wild-type protein normally acts inside the cell. We show that Fringe specifically binds the nucleoside diphosphate UDP, a feature of many glycosyltransferases. Furthermore, specific mutation of a DxD motif (in the single-letter amino acid code where x is any amino acid), a hallmark of most glycosyltransferases that use nucleoside diphosphate sugars, did not affect the Golgi localisation of the protein but completely eliminated in vivo activity. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that Fringe does not exert its effects outside of the cell, but rather acts in the Golgi apparatus, apparently as a glycosyltransferase. They suggest that alteration in receptor glycosylation can regulate the relative efficiency of different ligands.

Amino Acid Motifs↗
PubMed2001

Notch pathway: making sense of suppressor of hairless.

Suppressor of Hairless (Su(H)) is a DNA-binding protein component of the Notch signalling pathway, thought to be required, with a fragment of the Notch receptor, for target gene activation. Recent studies show that this is only one side of the story: target gene enhancers may be regulated by Su(H) in a variety of different ways.

Animals↗
PubMed1999

T-cell development: What does Notch do for T cells?

During their development, T cells are rescued from apoptotic cell death to follow distinct lineage fates. Recent data concerned with the role of the Notch transmembrane receptor in these events are interpreted to show that Notch promotes survival, but contrary to earlier reports has no function in lineage commitment.

Animals↗
PubMed1999

Repression by Notch is required before Wingless signalling during muscle progenitor cell development in Drosophila.

The larval muscles of Drosophila arise from the fusion of muscle founder cells, which give each individual muscle its identity, with myoblasts (reviewed in [1]). Muscle founder cells arise from the asymmetric division of muscle progenitor cells, each of which develops from a group of cells in the somatic mesoderm that express lethal of scute [2]. All the cells in a cluster can potentially form muscle progenitors, but owing to lateral inhibition, only one or two develop as such [2] [3] [4] [5]. Muscle progenitors, and the subsequent founder cells, then express transcription factors such as Krüppel, S59 and Even-skipped, which confer identity on the muscle [6] [7] [8]. Definition of some muscle progenitors, including three groups that express S59, depends on Wingless signalling [9]. Lateral inhibition requires Delta signalling through Notch and the transcription factor Suppressor of Hairless [3] [4] [5]. As the Wingless and lateral-inhibition signals are sequential [8], one might expect that muscle progenitors would fail to develop in the absence of Wingless signalling, regardless of the presence or absence of lateral-inhibition signalling. Here, we examine the development of the S59-expressing muscle progenitor cells in mutant backgrounds in which both Wingless signalling and lateral inhibition are disrupted. We show that progenitor cells failed to develop when both these processes were disrupted. Our analysis also reveals a repressive function of Notch, required before or concurrently with Wingless signalling, which is unrelated to its role in lateral inhibition.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

Notch and lymphopoiesis: a view from the microenvironment.

The differentiation of B- and T-cells in primary lymphoid organs depends on, or is strongly influenced by, signals provided by stromal cells, extracellular matrix components as well as by direct contacts between differentiating lymphocytes and distinct environmental cells. Notch receptors and their ligands mediate intercellular contacts and are crucially important for the development of T- and B-cell lineages. Here we start by reviewing current knowledge on the expression patterns of Notch receptors and their ligands in primary lymphoid organs and the effects induced by their functional interactions. Then we shall attempt to discuss how those interactions may regulate not only lymphopoiesis per se but also morphogenesis and the functional compartmentalization of lymphopoietic organs during development.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

From the yolk sac to the spleen: New roles for Notch in regulating hematopoiesis.

Although Notch receptors are widely expressed during hematopoiesis, their roles outside of the T cell lineage are not well characterized. Two reports in this issue of Immunity show that Notch1 and Notch2, respectively, are required to generate the earliest embryonic hematopoietic stem cells and splenic marginal zone B cells. Thus, different Notch receptors have specific and nonoverlapping functions that influence multiple hematopoietic lineages at various stages of development.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

A Notch so simple influence on T cell development.

T cell precursors undergo a series of developmental choices that progressively narrow their ability to give rise to different cell lineages. Evidence accumulated in the last few years suggests that Notch occupies a central place among the signal transduction pathways that regulate many of these choices, including the T/B, alphabeta/gammadelta and CD4/CD8 lineage decisions. Nevertheless the mechanisms by which Notch exerts its effects are not well understood, and in some cases the physiologic role is unclear. In this review we try to present succinctly the experiments and highlight the areas of controversy.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Requirements for presenilin-dependent cleavage of notch and other transmembrane proteins.

Ligand binding to receptors of the LIN-12/Notch family causes at least two proteolytic cleavages: one between the extracellular and transmembrane domains, and the other within the transmembrane domain. The transmembrane cleavage depends on Presenilin, a protein also required for transmembrane cleavage of beta-APP. Here, we have assayed the substrate requirements for Presenilin-dependent processing of Notch and other type I transmembrane proteins in vivo. We find that the Presenilin-dependent cleavage does not depend critically on the recognition of particular sequences in these proteins but rather on the size of the extracellular domain: the smaller the size, the greater the efficiency of cleavage. Hence, Notch, beta-APP, and perhaps other proteins may be targeted for Presenilin-mediated transmembrane cleavage by upstream processing events that sever the extracellular domain from the rest of the protein.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed2003

Notch, a unifying target in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia?

The expression of both Notch3 and pre-T-cell-receptor (pre-TCR) invariant chain appears to be a common feature of all T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemias (T-ALL). Notch genes, and other genes that are dysregulated in some T-ALL subgroups, encode factors that play a crucial role in both T-cell development and leukemogenesis. A complex network of signals, involving Notchs, pre-TCR, nuclear factor kappaB and E2A, appears to be responsible for the leukemogenesis process. Thus, T-ALL is a paradigm for developmental pathways that underlie the pathogenesis of this disease.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

aph-1 and pen-2 are required for Notch pathway signaling, gamma-secretase cleavage of betaAPP, and presenilin protein accumulation.

Presenilins are components of the gamma-secretase protein complex that mediates intramembranous cleavage of betaAPP and Notch proteins. A C. elegans genetic screen revealed two genes, aph-1 and pen-2, encoding multipass transmembrane proteins, that interact strongly with sel-12/presenilin and aph-2/nicastrin. Human aph-1 and pen-2 partially rescue the C. elegans mutant phenotypes, demonstrating conserved functions. The human genes must be provided together to rescue the mutant phenotypes, and the inclusion of presenilin-1 improves rescue, suggesting that they interact closely with each other and with presenilin. RNAi-mediated inactivation of aph-1, pen-2, or nicastrin in cultured Drosophila cells reduces gamma-secretase cleavage of betaAPP and Notch substrates and reduces the levels of processed presenilin. aph-1 and pen-2, like nicastrin, are required for the activity and accumulation of gamma-secretase.

Alzheimer Disease↗
PubMed2002

sonic hedgehog and vascular endothelial growth factor act upstream of the Notch pathway during arterial endothelial differentiation.

The appearance of molecular differences between arterial and venous endothelial cells before circulation suggests that genetic factors determine these cell types. We find that vascular endothelial growth factor (vegf) acts downstream of sonic hedgehog (shh) and upstream of the Notch pathway to determine arterial cell fate. Loss of Vegf or Shh results in loss of arterial identity, while exogenous expression of these factors causes ectopic expression of arterial markers. Microinjection of vegf mRNA into embryos lacking Shh activity can rescue arterial differentiation. Finally, activation of the Notch pathway in the absence of Vegf signaling can rescue arterial marker gene expression. These studies reveal a complex signaling cascade responsible for establishing arterial cell fate and suggest differential effects of Vegf on developing endothelial cells.

Animals↗