Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Information Processing”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,387 records · Page 77Linked to original sources

Information processing by parafoveal cells in the primate nucleus of the optic tract.

We recorded from single units in the pretectal nucleus of the optic tract (NOT) of the nonhuman primate. Specifically, we examined units that are modulated during smooth tracking of a small laser spot against a dark background. We used a nonlinear optimization procedure to determine whether the unit responses of these parafoveal cells are better described by a model that incorporates retinal error motion parameters or by a model that incorporates eye motion parameters. Our main finding was that all the cells in our sample group were better fit with a three-component model that incorporated retinal error motion parameters of position, velocity and acceleration (average coefficient of determination = 0.84) than a model that used position, velocity and acceleration components of eye motion (average coefficient of determination = 0.68). Other analyses involved comparison of goodness of fit between the three-component retinal error model and two-component retinal error models that excluded position or acceleration related terms. We found that there was a statistically significant degradation in the fit when position and acceleration related terms were dropped from the retinal error based model (P<0.05). Unit data from experiments in which the laser spot was extinguished for a brief period of time during tracking showed that the unit response was decreased following the target blink. We conclude on the basis of this and previous experimental data and our dynamic modeling approach that the parafoveal cells in the NOT primarily encode retinal error motion. Further they encode position, velocity and acceleration components of retinal error that could be used by other downstream structures for synthesis of a smooth-pursuit eye movement.

Action Potentials↗

[Systemic diagnostic error of senile dementia by cataract-related impairment of information processing?].

PURPOSE: According to several investigations, late-acquired diagnostically unspecified visual impairments lead to reduced intelligence levels. In cataracts, in particular, we measured reductions in IQ prior to IOL implantation. QUESTION: Do cataract-related IQ impairments reach the level of senile dementia? OBJECTIVE: To examine if cataracts and their removal have a particular relevance in senile dementia. METHODS: The IQ reduction measured in cataract samples in four studies are compared with normal values of dementia. In addition, research of the literature on diagnostic problems. RESULTS: Compared with the post-surgical score the IQ was much lower before IOL implantation. The difference corresponds to that of dementia with moderate to medium severity. Controls, however, displayed no change of IQ. According to ICD-10 and DSM-IV the cataract patients met the criteria of senile dementia. A review of the literature suggested statistical associations of prevalence of cataract and senile dementia, but did not deal with diagnostic problems. CONCLUSIONS: One component of the psychometrically obtained cognitive impairment in late-acquired cataracts seems to be a methodical artifact. The remaining component, however, cannot be distinguished from that of a "senile dementia" and leads to an increase in severity. In this case, cataract surgery may lower or even abolish the symptoms of dementia within a few weeks which would be of great importance to the patients, their relatives and health insurance.

Aged↗

Beyond drug effects and dependent variables: the use of the Poisson-Erlang model to assess the effects of D-amphetamine on information processing.

Several studies have shown that d-amphetamine (DAMP) speeds mean reaction time (RT). However, the use of mean RT may obscure important aspects of the drug response. Therefore we applied the Poisson-Erlang (PE) stochastic model of choice reaction time proposed by Pieters (1985) to the RT distribution. This model proposes that the RT distribution is generated by two states: Processing (P) and Distraction (D). RT represents the sum of the time spent in each of these states. P is the time taken to complete a set of cognitive operations which are required to give a correct response. D represents the time taken by all other activities. RTs were collected using a task (SERS) in which stimulus and response complexity each had two levels, easy and hard. Subjects were tested pre- and postdrug. Drug conditions were: placebo, 10 mg d-amphetamine (DAMP), 4 mg of the dopamine agonist, pimozide, and a combination of DAMP and pimozide (COMBO). Parameters of the model were derived using methods described by Pieters. Four measures were analyzed: Processing Time (PT); Mean Time per distraction (XTD); Distraction Rate (DR); and Total Distraction Time per trial (TDT). Mean RT is also presented. Analyses of the effects of task conditions on the parameters of the model were made using the predrug sessions. Mean RT was increased by both stimulus and response complexities as was PT. TDT was increased by the task conditions. The PE measures did not change over days. DAMP speeded mean RT. However, this effect did not interact with the task factors. DAMP speeded processing and reduced distraction. Processing was speeded only in the hard response condition, distraction time was reduced only in the easy response condition. The results indicate that the PE model can be successfully applied to fast RT tasks. More importantly, the parameters of the model revealed important pharmacological effects that were not apparent in mean RT. DAMP speeds cognitive operations related to motor preparation and reduces the effects of distraction. Consistent with past studies there are no indications that DAMP interacted with stimulus processing. The distraction effect appears to be mediated by an increase in the rate of distraction and a decrease in the average time of these distractions.

Adult↗