[Estrus and conception in cattle following cycle synchronization and HCG-administration].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Animals↗
SEARCH · Search PubMed
Results for “Estrus Synchronization”
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Estrus and ovulation in gilts fed a synthetic progestogen.
A synthetic progestogen, allyl trenbolone (AT), was fed to sexually mature gilts to determine the effective doses for the control of estrus and ovulation. Gilts were assigned to a control group and 5 treatment groups receiving 10.0, 12.5, 15.0, 17.5 or 20.0 mg of AT mixed in .45 kg of feed/head/day for 18 consecutive days. Ovarian morphology was determined by laparotomy following estrus or at 10 days post-treatment. AT suppressed estrus in all gilts during treatment. Estrus was effectively synchronized in treated gilts. The average interval from withdrawal of progestogen treatment to estrus was 4.5 days for 48 of 50 treated gilts that were in estrus within 10 days after treatment. The average ovulation rate in treated gilts was similar to control gilts. No detrimental side effects, due to treatment, were observed with the possible exception of a slight increase in the incidence of cystic follicles.
Journal Article↗
Presynchronization with gonadotropin-releasing hormone does not improve fertility in Holstein heifers.
Holstein dairy heifers were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 treatments to determine whether a presynchronization strategy using GnRH would improve reproductive performance after synchronization of ovulation and timed artificial insemination (TAI). Heifers (n = 82) in the first treatment (GPG) received a hormonal protocol for synchronization of ovulation and TAI (100 microg of GnRH, d 0; 25 mg of PGF2alpha, d 6; 100 microg of GnRH + TAI, d 8); whereas heifers (n = 84) in the second treatment (GGPG) received GPG, but with the addition of a GnRH injection (100 microg) 7 d before initiation of the GPG protocol. The proportion of heifers receiving AI before d 8 was similar for GPG (4.9%) and GGPG (9.5%), and the proportion of heifers diagnosed pregnant 30 d after AI did not differ between treatments (45 vs. 51%, respectively). Treatment did not affect the proportion of heifers ovulating after the second GnRH injection or the proportion in which a corpus luteum regressed after treatment with PGF2alpha. In conclusion, presynchronization with GnRH 7 d before initiation of synchronization of ovulation using GnRH and PGF2alpha did not affect the proportion of heifers expressing estrus before TAI or improve synchronization response or fertility to the synchronization protocol.
Animal Husbandry↗
Exogenous growth hormone improves the number of transferable embryos in superovulated ewes.
The application of pGH (porcine Growth Hormone) to superovulated ewes was studied with the aim of improving the embryo yield. Thirty-seven ewes were superovulated with pFSH for 3 d and 18 of them were cotreated the third day with 0.50 mg of pGH. Embryos were surgically recovered on Day 7 after sponge withdrawal. Then, 102 morphologically healthy embryos were immediately transferred in pairs to 51 synchronized recipient ewes. The GH treatment did not significantly affect the percentage of ewes in estrus, the time of estrus onset or the ovulation rate. However, it improved synchronization by grouping estrus in a narrower range (12 h) in comparison to the control group (24 h); (16 to 28 h after sponge withdrawal vs 12 to 36 h; P < 0.05). The total amount of LH released during the preovulatory surge was lower in the GH than in the control group (P < 0.05). No differences were found between groups for other LH-related parameters such as basal levels, peak values or peak time from sponge removal. The proportions of unfertilized oocytes and degenerate embryos recovered were lower in the GH cotreated group (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively). This resulted in higher rates of transferable embryos and lambs born per donor ewe in the GH than in the untreated group (3.9 vs 1.7 and 2.28 vs 0.84, respectively; both, P < 0.05). These beneficial effects of GH would likely be due either to a direct action on oocyte maturation or to an indirect action on the oviductal environment.
Animal Husbandry↗
Special relationships instead of female dominance for redfronted lemurs, Eulemur fulvus rufus.
Most lemurs yet studied in detail exhibit some mode of adult female social dominance over males. The known exception, a brown lemur subspecies known as rufous or redfronted lemurs (Eulemur fulvus rufus), forms multimale-multifemale social groups within which unambiguous dominance relations are not observed among adults. Resting groups of redfronted lemurs consistently include huddling adult male-female pairs whose males selectively scentmark and rub their heads in the scentmarks of their female huddling partners. Quantitative observations confirmed that some of these male-female pairs maintain special relationships satisfying all criteria originally developed in research on cercopithecine monkeys. Observations before, during, and after mating season, intergroup encounters, male transfers, and changes in male-female affiliations illuminated developmental and functional aspects of male-female partnerships. Each adult female in two semi-free-ranging study groups shared high rates of association, grooming, and agonistic support and low rates of agonistic interaction with one unrelated or distantly related adult male partner. Such affinity characterized small proportions of adult male-female relationships. Several males directed not only support but also aggression toward adult females with whom they sought to affiliate. All bonded males sought to copulate with their partners, and some appeared to ignore estrus in nonpartners. All females accepted copulation attempts from partners and some seemed to prefer their partners as mates. Partial synchronization of brief estrus periods together with concealed ovulation appeared to minimize chances for polygynous mating. Results support the view that the male-female pair is the fundamental social unit of E. fulvus and suggest that female partnership with individual males obviates dominance behavior, including female dominance, in this lemurid primate.
Agonistic Behavior↗
Influence of Synchro-Mate-B and breed composition on estrous response and pregnancy rate in spring- and fall-bred Brahman crossbred beef cows.
Estrous response, pregnancy rate, and the relationship between palpable corpora lutea (CL) and plasma progesterone concentrations were studied during the spring (n = 149) and fall (n = 146) breeding seasons using postpartum, crossbred beef cows consisting of 0-Brahman, 1 4 - Brahman , or 1 2 Brahman breeding. At the start of each breeding season, a jugular blood sample was collected for progesterone analysis; each cow was palpated for the presence of a CL and randomly alloted within breed to a non-treated control or Synchro-Mate-B (SMB) treatment. Fewer (P<0.01) fall than spring bred cows exhibited estrus within the first 21 d of breeding. Within 48 h of implant removal, 84 and 64% (spring and fall, respectively) of synchronized cows exhibited estrus. In both seasons, more SMB than control cows became pregnant by 7 d of breeding. Percentage of Brahman breeding did not influence estrous response or pregnancy rate. On the basis of 292 evaluations, palpation per rectum correctly assessed ovarian status 74% of the time. These data indicate that although season can influence response. SMB can be used effectively to synchronize Brahman crossbred cows. In addition, it was found that there is a close relationship between palpation per rectum and plasma concentrations of progesterone.
Journal Article↗
Resynchronization of estrus in cattle of unknown pregnancy status using estrogen, progesterone, or both.
Our objective was to develop treatments applied to cattle of unknown pregnancy status that would resynchronize the repeat estrus of nonpregnant females. In Exp. 1, previously inseminated dairy and beef heifers were assigned randomly to each of three treatments 13 d after AI: 1) no treatment (controls; n = 44); 2) 0.5 mg of estradiol cypionate (ECP) i.m. on d 13 and 20 at the time of insertion and removal of a used intravaginal progesterone (P4)-releasing insert (CIDR; P4 + ECP; n = 44); and 3) same as P4 + ECP without injections of ECP (P4; n = 42). The P4 + ECP (>90%) and P4 (>75%) protocols effectively synchronized repeat periods of estrus to 2 d and did not harm established pregnancies. In Exp. 2, treatments similar to those in Exp. 1 were applied to previously inseminated beef heifers (n = 439). Feeding 0.5 mg of melengestrol acetate (MGA) from d 13 to 19 after AI replaced the CIDR as a source of progestin. Of those heifers not pregnant (n = 65) after the initial AI, more than 86% were reinseminated, but conception was decreased (P < 0.05) by 28 to 39% compared with controls. In Exp. 3, previously inseminated lactating beef cows at four locations were assigned within herd to each of three treatments: 1) no treatment (control; n = 307); 2) same as in Exp. 1, but with P4 + 1 mg of estradiol benzoate on d 13 and 20 (P4 + EB; n = 153); and 3) same as in Exp. 1, P4 + ECP (n = 149). Treatments with P4 plus estrogen did not decrease conception rates in pregnant cows at any location, but increased (P < 0.05) the percentage of nonpregnant cows returning to estrus between 19 and 23 d after timed AI from 29% in controls to 86% in P4 + EB and 65% in P4 + ECP cows. Conception rates at the return estrus were not decreased when treatments occurred between d 13 and 20. In Exp. 4, lactating beef cows were assigned as in Exp. 3 to each of three treatments: 1) no treatment (controls; n = 51); 2) P4 + ECP (n = 47), as in Exp. 1; and 3) a single injection of ECP on d 13 (n = 48). Previously established pregnancies were not harmed (P = 0.70), and return rates of nonpregnant cows did not differ (P = 0.78) among treatments. In summary, in both heifers and lactating beef cows, the P4-based resynchronization treatments increased synchronized return rates when estrus detection rates were low, had no negative effects on established pregnancies, and decreased or tended to decrease conception rates at the resynchronized estrus.
Administration, Intravaginal↗
Manipulation and control of the estrous cycle in pasture-based dairy cows.
Treatments designed to synchronize luteolysis, preovulatory follicular development, and ovulation, and resynchronize estrus after a first AI have improved responses to synchronization treatments. Protocols based only on the use of PGF result in variable onset of estrus. Concentrations of progesterone prior to administering PGF have affected submission rates and fertility while administration of estradiol benzoate (EB) after inducing luteolysis has improved the synchrony of estrus and ovulation in some studies. In pasture-based dairy cows, GnRH-based protocols have generally resulted in one-third of both anestrous and cycling cows conceiving following synchronization of ovulation and timed AI. Protocols which use intravaginal progesterone releasing inserts (IVP4) are effective in inducing estrus in over 90% of treated dairy cows. Resynchronization of estrus after reinsertion of an IVP4 also improves the synchrony of returns to estrus, but pregnancy rates to the first AI have been reduced in some studies, and submission rates at a resynchronized estrus are less than at the first synchronized estrus. Administration of EB can be used to synchronize follicle wave emergence in resynchronized cows with intervals to new wave emergence comparable to that in cows synchronized for a first AI, but plasma concentrations of progesterone following treatment may be reduced. Synchronization of estrus and ovulation can be enhanced by administration of EB or GnRH during proestrus, but dose, timing and stage of follicular development at the time of treatment can affect outcomes.
Administration, Intravaginal↗
Serum testosterone concentration, efficiency of estrus detection and libido expression in androgenized beef cows.
Twenty multiparous, cyclic, nonlactating beef cows were blocked by dominance rank and randomly and equally allotted to 1 of 4 treatment groups: an untreated control group, a synovex-treated group which received 8 Synovex-H implants with no additional hormones, a testosterone-treated group which received 500 mg, i.m. and 1500 mg, s.c. testosterone enanthate on Day 1 with additional 1000 mg, s.c. doses of testosterone enanthate every 14 d, and a synovex + testosterone-treated group which received 8 Synovex-H implants with 500 mg, i.m. and 1500 mg, s.c. testosterone enanthate on Day 1 only. Blood samples were collected via jugular venipuncture once a week beginning 3 wk prior to start of treatment. In addition, samples were collected just prior to treatment; once a day for 1 wk after initiation of treatment; and then twice a week until 225 d after treatment. Efficiency of estrus detection was assessed 22 d prior to start of treatment and every 14 d thereafter for 98 d, using estrus detection trials with synchronized females or modified libido tests. Scores for estrus detection trials included total mounts in 1 h and the percentage of estrous cows detected. Libido was scored on a scale of 0 through 6. All testosterone treatments raised plasma testosterone concentrations above control and pretreatment levels (testosterone and synovex + testosterone > synovex > control; all P < 0.05). Synovex-, testosterone- and synovex + testosterone-treated females performed more mounts in 1 h than the controls (18, 9, 6 and 1, respectively; all P < 0.05). All testosterone-treated cows mounted a higher number of estrous females than the controls (P < 0.05). Only synovex + testosterone- and testosterone-treated cows received libido scores above pretreatment and control values. However, libido of testosterone-treated cows decreased over time, while that of synovex + testosterone-treated females remained high until Day 98. Libido scores correlated positively with the number of mounts in 1 h and the percentage of estrous females detected (0.70 and 0.44, respectively), and the correlation coefficient for these two factors was 0.63. In conclusion, the synovex + testosterone treatment was most effective for producing estrus detector females and libido testing was useful for evaluating sexual activity in androgenized females.
Animals↗
Influence of GnRH administration on timing of the LH surge and ovulation in dwarf goats.
This study was conducted to determine whether or not exogenous gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) alters the timing or improves the synchrony of estrus, the LH surge, and ovulation following estrous synchronization in dwarf goats, and to assess the effects of season on these parameters. In January and June, estrus was synchronized in 12 Pygmy and Nigerian Dwarf goats with a 10-day progestagen sponge, 125 microg cloprostenol i.m. 48 h before sponge removal, and 300 IU equine chorionic gonadotrophin (eCG) i.m. at sponge removal. Six of the 12 goats were given 50 microg GnRH i.m. 24h after sponge removal. Onset of estrus was monitored using two males. Samples for plasma LH were collected at 2 h intervals beginning 22 h after sponge removal and ending at 48 h in January and at 58 h in June. Time of ovulation time was confirmed by laparoscopy at 36, 50, 60, and 74 h in January and at 50, 60, and 74 h in June. Administration of GnRH had no significant effect on the onset of estrus; however, it reduced the interval from sponge removal to the LH surge and improved the synchrony of the LH surge (P<0.05). Treatment with GnRH also reduced the interval from sponge removal to ovulation and improved the synchrony of ovulation (P<0.05). Season had a significant effect on the timing and the synchrony of estrus with and without GnRH treatment (P<0.05). A seasonal shift was also observed in the timing of the LH surge in the absence of GnRH treatment (P<0.05). Further research is required to determine the optimum time for GnRH administration and the minimum effective dose in dwarf goats.
Administration, Intravaginal↗
Effects of estrous synchronization on response to nitric oxide donors, nitric oxide synthase inhibitors, and endothelin-1 in vitro.
Two experiments were conducted to determine the effects of nitric oxide (NO) donors, endothelin-(ET-1), and NO synthase (NOS) inhibitors on bovine luteal function in vitro. In experiment 1, estrus in Brahman cows was synchronized with Synchro-Mate-B (SMB) and day-13-14 corpora luteal slices were weighed, diced and incubated in vitro. Treatments (100 ng/ml) were: vehicle, N[see symbol in text]-nitro-L-arginine-L-methyl ester (L-NAME), N(G)-monomethyl-L-arginine acetate (L-NMMA), diethylenetriamine (DETA), DETA-NONOate, sodium nitroprusside (SNP), or ET-1. In experiment 2, estrus was synchronized with Lutalyse, a Controlled Intravaginal Progesterone Releasing Device (CIDR), or cows were not synchronized. Corpora lutea were collected, weighed, and luteal slices were weighed, diced and incubated in vitro with treatments. Treatments (100ng/ml) were: vehicle, L- NAME, L-NMMA, DETA, DETA-NONOate, sodium nitroprusside, S-nitroso-N-acetylpenicillamine (SNAP) or endothelin-1. Tissues were incubated in M- 199 for 1 h without treatments and for 4 and 8 h in both experiments with treatments in both experiments. Media were analyzed for progesterone, prostaglandins E2 and F2alpha (PGE2, PGF2alpha) by radioimmunoassay (RIA). Hormone data in experiments 1 and 2 were analyzed by 2 x 7 and 3 x 2 x 8 factorial design for analysis of variance (ANOVA), respectively. Luteal weights in experiment 2 were analyzed by a one-way ANOVA. Concentrations of progesterone in media were similar (P > or = 0.05) among treatments within experiments. Concentrations of PGE2 in media in experiment 1 were undetectable in 90 and 57% of the samples at 4 and 8 h, respectively. PGF2alpha increased (P < or = 0.05) with time, but did not differ (P > or = 0.05) among treatments. Secretion of PGF2alpha was not affected by treatments (P > or = 0.05). In experiment 2, luteal weights of the induced estrous cycle were decreased (P < or = 0.05) by Lutalyse. Concentrations of PGE2 and PGF2alpha increased (P < or = 0.05) with time in control of all three synchronization regimens. DETA-NONOate, SNAP, sodium nitroprusside (NO donors) and ET-1 increased (P < or = 0.05) PGE2 except in the CIDR synchronized group (P > or = 0.05). No treatment increased (P > or = 0.05) PGF2alpha in any synchronization regimen. It is concluded that either SMB containing norgestomet or a CIDR containing progesterone alters luteal secretion of PGE2, Lutalyse lowers luteal weights in the induced estrous cycle, and NO or ET-1 given alone are not luteolytic agents. It is suggested that NO and ET-1 could have indirect antiluteolytic/luteotropic effects via increasing PGE2 secretion by luteal tissue rather than being luteolytic.
Animals↗
Management considerations in heifer development and puberty.
Management of replacement beef heifers should focus on factors that enhance physiological processes that promote puberty. Age at puberty is important as a production trait when heifers are bred to calve as 2-yr-olds and in systems that impose restricted breeding periods. Calving by 24 mo of age is necessary to obtain maximum lifetime productivity. Because the reproductive system is the last major organ system to mature, factors that influence puberty are critical. The influence of environment on the sequence of events leading to puberty in the heifer is dictated largely by the nutritional status of the animal and related effects on growth rate and development. Management strategies have been designed to ensure that heifers reach a prebreeding target weight that supports optimum reproductive performance, and consequences of inadequate or excessive development have been evaluated. Those strategies are based on evidence linking postweaning nutritional development with key reproductive events that include age at puberty and first breeding, conception, pregnancy loss, incidence and severity of dystocia, and postpartum interval to estrus. Management alternatives that ultimately affect lifetime productivity and reproductive performance of heifers begin at birth and include decisions that involve growth-promoting implants, creep-feeding, breed type and(or) species, birth date and weaning weight, social interaction, sire selection, and exogenous hormonal treatments to synchronize or induce estrus. Basic and applied future research efforts should converge to match in a realistic manner the production potential of the animal with available resources. Strategies that incorporate consideration of nutrition, genetics, and emerging management techniques will need to be tested to enable producers to make decisions that result in profit. This review evaluates the current status of knowledge relating to management of the replacement beef heifer and serves to stimulate research needed to enhance management techniques to ensure puberty at an optimal age.
Animal Feed↗
Insemination of Holstein heifers at a preset time after estrous cycle synchronization using progesterone and prostaglandin.
Two experiments were conducted to study estrous cycle control regimens that combine progesterone administration via an intravaginal device ( PRID ) with a single injection of prostaglandin F2 alpha (PG). In Exp. I, 242 Holstein heifers were assigned randomly to one of three treatment groups at 14 to 18 mo of age. Treatments were: 1) control, 2) PRID -6 + PG-6 ( PRID in place for 6 d plus PG on the day of PRID removal) and 3) PRID -7 + PG-6 ( PRID in place for 7 d plus PG on the day before PRID removal). Heifers were observed for estrous activity and were inseminated at 8 to 20 h after estrus was detected. Estrus and ovulation were effectively synchronized after both PRID + PG treatments. Ninety-nine percent of the heifers in each group were in estrus within 168 h after PG injection. However, the interval from PG administration to the onset of estrus was longer after PRID -7 + PG-6 (75 +/- 2 h) than after PRID -6 + PG-6 (66 +/- 2 h). A lower variance in the interval from PG treatment to estrus was observed after PRID -7 + PG-6, suggesting that the 24 h delay in PRID withdrawal improved the synchrony of the onset of estrus. Pregnancy rates (72 to 82%) did not vary across treatment groups. Two-hundred seventy-four heifers were assigned to Exp. II. Treatments were 1) control, 2) 2 X PG (two injections of PG at an 11 d interval) and 3) PRID -7 + PG-6.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Animals↗
Comparison of methods for the synchronization of estrous cycles in dairy cows. 2. Effects of progesterone and parity on conception.
Three experiments with 571 dairy cows indicated that significantly more primiparous cows given two prostaglandin F2 alpha injections 14 d apart conceived within 30 d of first AI than did cows given two injections 11 d apart (84 vs. 62%). Fewer multiparous cows given two injections 14 d apart and inseminated after estrus conceived than did cows given two injections and a progesterone intravaginal coil inserted 8 d after the first injection (42 vs. 66%). Fewer cows given one injection of prostaglandin and inseminated at estrus conceived than did cows given two injections 14 d apart and a progesterone coil (39 vs. 66%). Conception rates of cows given two prostaglandin injections were positively related to plasma progesterone concentrations 2 and 4 d before the second injection (r = .81 and .86). Cows with progesterone concentrations below 5 ng/ml, 2 d before the second prostaglandin injection, and synchronized by two prostaglandin injections or by two injections and a progesterone coil had conception rates of 36 and 63%, respectively. Cows with progesterone concentrations above 5 ng/ml had a conception rate of 75 and 46% in the two treatments, respectively. Conception after estrus synchronization depends on the method and on the plasma concentrations of progesterone. Progesterone coils may be used before AI to enhance fertility in cows with low progesterone concentrations.
Administration, Intravaginal↗
The synchrony of prostaglandin-induced estrus in cows was reduced by pretreatment with hCG.
The induction of optimal synchrony of estrus in cows requires synchronization of luteolysis and of the waves of follicular growth (follicular waves). The aim of this study was to determine whether hormonal treatments aimed at synchronizing follicular waves improved the synchrony of prostaglandin (PG)-induced estrus. In Experiment 1, cows were treated on Day 5 of the estrous cycle with saline in Group 1 (n = 25; 16 ml, i.v., 12 h apart), with hCG in Group 2 (n = 27; 3000 IU, i.v.), or with hCG and bovine follicular fluid (bFF) in Group 3 (n = 21; 16 ml, i.v., 12 h apart). On Day 12, all cows were treated with prostaglandin (PG; 500 micrograms cloprostenol, i.m.). In Experiment 2, cows were treated on Day 5 of the estrous cycle with saline (3 ml, i.m.) in Group 1 (n = 22) or with hCG (3000 IU, i.v.) in Group 2 (n = 20) and Group 3 (n = 22). On Day 12, the cows were treated with PG (500 micrograms in Groups 1 and 2; 1000 micrograms in Group 3). Blood samples for progesterone (P4) determination were collected on Day 12 (Experiment 1) or on Days 12 and 14 (Experiment 2). Cows were fitted with heat mount detectors and observed twice a day for signs of estrus. Four cows in Experiment 1 (1 cow each from Groups 1 and 2; 2 cows from Group 3) had plasma P4 concentrations below 1 ng/ml on Day 12 and were excluded from the analyses. In Experiment 1, cows treated with hCG or hCG + bFF had a more variable (P = 0.0007, P = 0.0005) day of occurrence of and a longer interval to estrus (5.9 +/- 0.7 d, P = 0.003 and 6.2 +/- 0.8 d, P = 0.005) than saline-treated cows (3.4 +/- 0.4 d). The plasma P4 concentrations on Day 12 were higher (P < 0.0001) in hCG- and in hCG + bFF-treated cows than in saline-treated cows (9.4 +/- 0.75 and 8.5 +/- 0.75 vs 4.1 +/- 0.27 ng/ml), but there was no correlation (P > 0.05) between plasma P4 concentrations and the interval to estrus. In Experiment 2, cows treated with hCG/500PG and hCG/1000PG had a more variable (P = 0.0007, P = 0.002) day of occurrence of and a longer interval to estrus (4.2 +/- 0.4 d, P = 0.04; 4.1 +/- 0.4 d, P = 0.03) than saline/500PG-treated cows (3.2 +/- 0.1 d). The concentrations of plasma P4 on Days 12 and 14 of both hCG/500PG- and hCG/1000PG-treated cows were higher (P < 0.05) than in saline/500PG-treated cows (7.3 +/- 0.64, 0.7 +/- 0.08 and 7.7 +/- 0.49, 0.7 +/- 0.06 vs 5.3 +/- 0.37, 0.5 +/- 0.03 ng/ml). The concentrations of plasma P4 on Days 12 or 14 and the interval to estrus were not correlated (P > 0.05) in any treatment group. The concentrations of plasma P4 on Days 12 and 14 of hCG/500PG- or hCG/1000PG-treated cows were correlated (r = 0.65, P < 0.05; r = 0.50, P < 0.05). This study indicated that treatment of cows with hCG on Day 5 of the estrous cycle reduced the synchrony of PG-induced estrus and that this reduction was not due to the failure of luteal regression.
Animals↗
[Sex behavior and reproduction of farm animals].
The sexual behaviour of farm animals was followed up both at loose-pasture raising and under industrial conditions. It was studied in estrus, in the search for a sexual partner, with regard to the tolerance of the female animals for the males in the sexual act, with regard to the herd hierarchy, the intraspecies relationships, and the condition of dominance, aggressiveness, and subordination. The role is stated of the presence of male animals in the herd for the regular course of the sexual cycle, and the shortening and synchronization of the estrus. Discussed is also the importance of the artificial visual, sound, olfactory, tactile and other stimuli of the behaviour of the male breeding animals in substantiating the coitus and the proper semen production. It was found that the reproductive process is largely dependent on on the sexual reactions of the animals, which requires a proper knowledge with regard to the substantiation of each sexual cycle. Thus, it is stated, higher conception and fertility rates are to be expected. It was also established that under the conditions of industrial technologies of raising the number of behavioural reactions in their use was strongly reduced because of the lowered contact between the individual groups, while the practice of artificial insemination thoroughly rules out the contact between the male and female animals.
Animals↗
Artificial insemination of subtropical commercial beef cattle following synchronization with cloprostenol (ICI 80996): II. Estrous response.
Data collected from two controlled breeding field trials involving 561 Bos indicusxBos taurus cows and heifers were analyzed for estrous and fertility response following a cloprostenol ICI-80, 996 (CLP) synchronization regime. Fertility data were discussed in a companion paper (1). In Trial 1, 128 animals were assigned to four treatments: 1) controls which were inseminated at the naturally occurring estrus; 2) Animals artificially inseminated at approximately 72 hr and 96 hr following a second CLP; 3) Animals artificially inseminated at approximately 72 hr following a second CLP; and 4) Animals artificially inseminated approximately 12 hr after detection of estrus post-second CLP. Trial II included 391 heifers distributed among six treatments: 1) Artificially inseminated between 70 and 90 hr post-second CLP; 2) Sham inseminated between 70 and 90 hr post-second CLP; 3) Processed with no manipulation of the genital tract between 70 and 90 hr post-second CLP; 4) Artificially inseminated approximately 12 hr after the detection of estrus following a second CLP; 5) Artificially inseminated at the naturally occurring estrus and 6) Non-treated heifers exposed to fertile bulls. Cloprostenol ICI-80996 was effective (P<.01) in synchronizing estrus in comparisons of treated vs non-treated controls in Trials I and II (82 vs 29%; 57 vs 19%, respectively). However, a significant reduction in the expression of estrus was observed following Timed AI when compared to heifers bred 12 hr after detection of CLP-induced estrus in Trial II (37 vs 54%, P<.05). The authors conclude that a single timed insemination of Brahman crossbred heifers suppresses the behavioral expression of estrus. Other evidence (1) indicates that the fertility during this period is similarly reduced.
Journal Article↗
Reproductive performance and productive traits of beef bulls selected for different levels of testosterone response to GnRH.
In two separate studies, one with four Hereford-Shorthorn and one with three Zebu x British crossbred bulls, the efficacy of using the testosterone response to gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH; Lutal, Hoechst) to predict differences in reproductive performance was assessed. Young bulls (17 or 29 months of age) selected for low to high (3.1 to 10.3 ng/ml) peak plasma testosterone 2 to 2.5 hours after the intramuscular injection of GnRH (62.5 to 2000 ng/kg LWT) were each later individually joined with groups of 19 to 30 cows in which estrus had been synchronized. In both studies, the rankings of bulls for overall fertility (capable cows pregnant), for libido (estrous cows mounted), and for fertilizing ability (mounted cows pregnant) were in close agreement with rankings for testosterone responses to GnRH. In the Bos indicus bulls rankings for both reproductive performance and testosterone response to GnRH were repeatable when measured at two and four years of age. Other reproductive measurements (semen quality, scrotal circumference, pen-type serving capacity tests) were less reliable predictors of reproductive performance. Measurements of liveweight gains and parasite resistance indicated that bulls superior for these characteristics do not always have satisfactory reproductive performance. These studies suggest that the testosterone response to GnRH could be a useful test to ensure that bulls selected for productive traits have adequate reproductive potential.
Journal Article↗