Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Cyclohexanecarboxylic Acids”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,369 records · Page 76Linked to original sources
PubMed1998

Antiasthmatic activity of the second-generation phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibitor SB 207499 (Ariflo) in the guinea pig.

We evaluated the airway activity of the novel phosphodiesterase type 4 inhibitor SB 207499 [Ariflo; c-4-cyano-4-(3-cyclopentyloxy-4-methoxyp henyl-r-1-cyclohexane carboxylic acid)], in the guinea pig. Ovalbumin (OA)-induced contractions of guinea pig isolated tracheal strips were inhibited by SB 207499 with an EC50 of 1 microM but had little or no effect on exogenous agonist-induced contraction, which suggests that its effect on OA-induced contraction in vitro is primarily due to inhibition of mediator release from mast cells. In anesthetized guinea pigs, SB 207499 inhibited OA-induced bronchoconstriction with i.v. and p.o. ID50 values of 1.7 and 17 mg/kg, respectively. At 1, 3 and 6 hr after SB 207499 (30 mg/kg p.o.), OA-induced bronchospasm was inhibited by 92%, 70% and 58%, respectively, corresponding to elevated plasma concentrations of 1.62 +/- 0.19, 1.65 +/- 0.29 and 0. 93 +/- 0.24 microg/ml, respectively, of SB 207499. SB 207499 also inhibited house dust mite-induced bronchoconstriction (ID50 = 0.9 mg/kg i.v. and 8.9 mg/kg p.o.). In contrast to its lack of bronchorelaxant activity in vitro, SB 207499 inhibited bronchospasm induced by i.v. leukotriene D4 (LTD4) [ID50 = 3 mg/kg i.v.]. The bronchorelaxant effect of i.v.-administered SB 207499 was at least additive with that of salbutamol in reversing infused histamine-enhanced airway tone, but it did not alter base line or enhance salbutamol-induced cardiovascular effects. In conscious guinea pigs, SB 207499 (10 or 30 mg/kg p.o.), 1 hr before antigen or LTD4 challenge, markedly reduced bronchospasm and subsequent eosinophil influx as measured by bronchoalveolar lavage 24 hr after provocation. SB 207499 administered after OA or LTD4 challenge also reduced airway eosinophilia measured at 24 hr after OA challenge or 96 hr after LTD4 challenge. These results, coupled with the broad anti-inflammatory activity of SB 207499 previously described (Barnett et al., 1998), suggest that SB 207499 will be useful in the treatment of asthma and other inflammatory disorders.

3',5'-Cyclic-AMP Phosphodiesterases↗
PubMed1998

Gabapentin potentiation of the antiepileptic efficacy of vigabatrin in an in vitro model of epilepsy.

1. An enhancement of promoted release of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and a change in GABA-metabolism have been suggested as mechanisms of action of gabapentin. Vigabatrin is supposed to act mainly via inhibition of GABA-transaminase but it also interferes with GABA-release and GABA-uptake. On the basis of these mechanisms of action, a pharmacodynamic interaction of the two antiepileptic drugs could be supposed which might be of relevance in the sense of a rational polypharmacy. 2. To address the aforementioned hypothesis, experiments were carried out on hippocampal slices (n=107) of guinea-pigs (n=70). Epileptiform field potentials (e.f.p.) were induced by omission of magnesium from the bath solution and recorded in the stratum pyramidale of the CA3 region. Gabapentin (30-600 microM; 5.1-102.72 microg ml(-1)), vigabatrin (50-200 microM, 6.45-25.8 microg ml(-1)) and the GABA(A)-receptor antagonist bicuculline (100 microM) were added to the bath solution for 3 h. 3. Gabapentin, in concentrations up to 600 microM, failed to decrease the repetition rate or duration of e.f.p. (n=19). However, vigabatrin, evoked a dose-dependent reduction of the repetition rate of e.f.p. For a concentration of 100 microM (12.9 microg ml(-1)) there was a reduction down to 48+/-5% (mean+/-s.e.mean) of the initial value within 3 h (n=11). With simultaneous administration of vigabatrin (100 microM) and gabapentin (60 microM) for 3 h (n=15), the repetition rate of e.f.p. decreased down to 8+/-3%, which is significantly different from the values obtained after administration of 100 microM vigabatrin alone (P<0.0001). Both, the antiepileptic effect of vigabatrin alone and the enhancement by gabapentin were blocked by the GABA(A)-receptor antagonist bicuculline (100 microM, n=16). 4. These results demonstrate that gabapentin is able to augment the antiepileptic effects of vigabatrin significantly. It is possible that a change in the GABA-release machinery is induced by vigabatrin which then can be augmented by gabapentin.

4-Aminobutyrate Transaminase↗
PubMed2005

Attenuation of morphine tolerance by intrathecal gabapentin is associated with suppression of morphine-evoked excitatory amino acid release in the rat spinal cord.

This study was designed to investigate the effect of acute and chronic intrathecal (i.t.) injection of gabapentin (GBP) on the antinociceptive effect of morphine and tolerance development using a tail-flick latency test. Levels of excitatory amino acids (EAA) in i.t. CSF dialysates were also measured by high performance liquid chromatography. Male Wistar rats were implanted with either one or two i.t. catheters for drug injection or pump infusion and with a microdialysis probe for CSF dialysate collection. The effect of acute GBP (10 microg i.t.) injection on the morphine dose response was examined in both naïve rats and rats made tolerant by continuous infusion of morphine (15 microg/h i.t.) for 5 days. At such a low dose (10 microg i.t.), GBP did not enhance morphine's antinociception in naïve rats. In morphine-tolerant rats, however, acute GBP (10 microg i.t.) injection potentiated morphine's antinociception and yielded a 14.6-fold shift in morphine's dose-response curve. When GBP (10 microg/h i.t.) was co-infused with morphine (15 microg/h i.t.) to examine its effect on the development of morphine tolerance, GBP attenuated the development of morphine tolerance. The effect of GBP and morphine on CSF glutamate and aspartate levels was examined in naïve rats, and the effect of morphine challenge on CSF glutamate and aspartate levels was examined in rats previously infused for 5 days with morphine alone or morphine plus GBP. Acute injection of GBP (10 microg i.t.), morphine (50 microg i.t.), or GBP (10 microg i.t.) followed by morphine (50 microg i.t.) 30 min later had no significant effect on CSF EAA concentration in naïve rats; however, in tolerant rats, morphine challenge (50 microg i.t.) increased aspartate and glutamate levels to 221 +/- 22% and 296 +/- 43%, respectively, of those before morphine challenge, and this phenomenon was inhibited by GBP co-infusion. Our results show that GBP, at a dose without enhanced effect on morphine's antinociception in naïve rats, not only potentiates morphine's antinociceptive effect in morphine-tolerant rats but also attenuates the development of morphine tolerance. The mechanism of the effect of GBP on morphine tolerance might be via suppression of the EAA concentration in spinal CSF dialysate.

Amines↗
PubMed2006

Pharmacokinetic variability of newer antiepileptic drugs: when is monitoring needed?

A new generation of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) has reached the market in recent years with ten new compounds: felbamate, gabapentin, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, pregabalin, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin and zonisamide. The newer AEDs in general have more predictable pharmacokinetics than older AEDs such as phenytoin, carbamazepine and valproic acid (valproate sodium), which have a pronounced inter-individual variability in their pharmacokinetics and a narrow therapeutic range. For these older drugs it has been common practice to adjust the dosage to achieve a serum drug concentration within a predefined 'therapeutic range', representing an interval where most patients are expected to show an optimal response. However, such ranges must be interpreted with caution, since many patients are optimally treated when they have serum concentrations below or above the suggested range. It is often said that there is less need for therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) with the newer AEDs, although this is partially based on the lack of documented correlation between serum concentration and drug effects. Nevertheless, TDM may be useful despite the shortcomings of existing therapeutic ranges, by utilisation of the concept of 'individual reference concentrations' based on intra-individual comparisons of drug serum concentrations. With this concept, TDM may be indicated regardless of the existence or lack of a well-defined therapeutic range. The ten newer AEDs all have different pharmacological properties, and therefore, the usefulness of TDM for these drugs has to be assessed individually. For vigabatrin, a clear relationship between drug concentration and clinical effect cannot be expected because of its unique mode of action. Therefore, TDM of vigabatrin is mainly to check compliance. The mode of action of the other new AEDs would not preclude the applicability of TDM. For the prodrug oxcarbazepine, TDM is also useful, since the active metabolite licarbazepine is measured. For drugs that are eliminated renally completely unchanged (gabapentin, pregabalin and vigabatrin) or mainly unchanged (levetiracetam and topiramate), the pharmacokinetic variability is less pronounced and more predictable. However, the dose-dependent absorption of gabapentin increases its pharmacokinetic variability. Drug interactions can affect topiramate concentrations markedly, and individual factors such as age, pregnancy and renal function will contribute to the pharmacokinetic variability of all renally eliminated AEDs. For those of the newer AEDs that are metabolised (felbamate, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, tiagabine and zonisamide), pharmacokinetic variability is just as relevant as for many of the older AEDs. Therefore, TDM is likely to be useful in many clinical settings for the newer AEDs. The purpose of the present review is to discuss individually the potential value of TDM of these newer AEDs, with emphasis on pharmacokinetic variability.

Amines↗
PubMed2002

Gabapentin-mediated inhibition of voltage-activated Ca2+ channel currents in cultured sensory neurones is dependent on culture conditions and channel subunit expression.

We have used the whole cell patch clamp method and fura-2 fluorescence imaging to study the actions of gabapentin (1-(aminoethyl) cyclohexane acetic acid) on voltage-activated Ca(2+) entry into neonatal cultured dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurones and differentiated F-11 (embryonic rat DRG x neuroblastoma hybrid) cells. Gabapentin (2.5 microM) in contrast to GABA (10 microM) did not influence resting membrane potential or input resistance. In current clamp mode gabapentin failed to influence the properties of evoked single action potentials but did reduce the duration of action potentials prolonged by Ba(2+). Gabapentin attenuated high voltage-activated Ca(2+) channel currents in a dose- and voltage- dependent manner in DRG neurones and reduced Ca(2+) influx evoked by K(+) depolarisation in differentiated F-11 cells loaded with fura-2. The sensitivity of DRG neurones to gabapentin was not changed by the GABA(B) receptor antagonist saclofen but pertussis toxin pre-treatment reduced the inhibitory effects of gabapentin. Experiments following pre-treatment of DRG neurones with a PKA-activator and a PKA-inhibitor implicated change in phosphorylation state as a mechanism, which influenced gabapentin action. Sp- and Rp-analogues of cAMP significantly increased or decreased gabapentin-mediated inhibition of voltage-activated Ca(2+) channel currents. Culture conditions used to maintain DRG neurones and passage number of differentiated F-11 cells also influenced the sensitivity of Ca(2+) channels to gabapentin. We analysed the Ca(2+) channel subunits expressed in populations of DRG neurones and F-11 cells that responded to gabapentin had low sensitivity to gabapentin or were insensitive to gabapentin, by Quantitative TaqMan PCR. The data obtained from this analysis suggested that the relative abundance of the Ca(2+) channel beta(2) and alpha(2)delta subunit expressed was a key determinant of gabapentin sensitivity of both cultured DRG neurones and differentiated F-11 cells. In conclusion, gabapentin inhibited part of the high voltage-activated Ca(2+) current in neonatal rat cultured DRG neurones via a mechanism that was independent of GABA receptor activation, but was sensitive to pertussis toxin. Gabapentin responses identified in this study implicated Ca(2+) channel beta(2) subunit type as critically important to drug sensitivity and interactions with alpha(1) and alpha(2)delta subunits may be implicated in antihyperalgesic therapeutic action for this compound.

Acetates↗
PubMed1999

Gabapentin.

Gabapentin (GBP) is a antiepileptic drug (AED) indicated as adjunct therapy for treatment of partial seizures, with and without secondary generalization, in patients 12 and older with epilepsy. GBP (1-(aminomethyl) cyclohexaneacetic acid) is structurally related to gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), which readily crosses the blood-brain barrier. Radiolabeled GBP binds throughout the central nervous system in anatomic areas important in treatment of seizures. Its precise mechanism of action is unknown. An open-label, dose-ranging study of doses up to 1,800 mg produced > or =50% seizure reductions [responder rate (RR)] in 29% of patients with partial seizures. Three double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel add-on trials at doses of 300-1,800 mg have produced RR of up to 28%, with a placebo RR of 8-10%. An active controlled, parallel group comparison of 600 mg to 2,400 mg in monotherapy conversion design showed no significant difference among the 600 mg, 1,200 mg, and 2,400 mg groups compared to a placebo group. An inpatient, active-controlled comparison of 300 mg and 3,600 mg in a parallel-design monotherapy trial showed that time to exit from the study was significantly longer for the 3,600-mg group and the completion rate significantly higher (53% vs. 17%) for patients receiving 3,600 mg/day vs. 300 mg/day of GBP. Successful double-blind, placebo-controlled trials in refractory childhood partial seizures and benign childhood epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes have been recently concluded. Absence was not successfully treated in one small double-blind trial. Open-label reports emphasize adjustments of patients to higher doses than those indicated in the package labeling. An open-label trial of GBP therapy in patients with partial seizures (n = 2,216) produced progressively greater seizure freedom rates as patients were titrated from > or =900 mg daily to > or = 1,800 mg daily (15.1% vs. 33.4%), with a similar effect on RR (18.1% vs. 44.9%). An add-on, open-label study treating partial seizures (n = 141) reported an RR of 71%, with 46% seizure-free in the last 8 weeks of treatment and doses up to 2,400 mg daily. A comparison trial of three doses of GBP to 600 mg of carbamazepine showed similar retention rates for 1,800 mg of GBP and 600 mg of CBZ. Another study reported 48% of patients experiencing 50% reduction, nine of whom had doses greater than 2,400 mg. Treatment in children has reported a 34.4% RR in 32 children with refractory partial seizures. A French open-label adjunctive trial documented a 33.9% RR; 13.4% were seizure-free during the evaluation period. Adverse experiences most commonly noted included somnolence, dizziness, and ataxia. Weight gain was sometimes reported with higher doses of GBP, and pediatric reports cite prominent behavioral changes, including hyperactivity, irritability, and agitation. GBP appears best used at doses at and potentially above those suggested in its package labeling. Although efficacy occurs at lower levels, increased GBP doses are associated with additional efficacy. Reports suggest that initiation at 2,400 mg or 3,600 mg may not be associated with increased adverse experiences. Titration to 900 or 1,200 mg on the first day of GBP therapy appear to be well tolerated.

Acetates↗
PubMed1999

Randomized double-blind study comparing the efficacy of gabapentin with amitriptyline on diabetic peripheral neuropathy pain.

BACKGROUND: Reports of gabapentin use in diabetic peripheral neuropathy pain stimulate a need for controlled trials to determine its comparative efficacy to the therapeutic standard of amitriptyline hydrochloride. OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of gabapentin compared with amitriptyline in treating diabetic peripheral neuropathy pain. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, crossover study. SETTING: Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, Ambulatory Care Clinic. PATIENTS: Twenty-eight veterans were referred by their primary care providers. Two patients withdrew before randomization because of no neuropathic pain after washout; a third withdrew for unexpected surgery that required analgesics. Three patients withdrew because of adverse effects and 1 for protocol violation. INTERVENTIONS: Patients with stable glycemic control and neuropathic pain randomized to 6 weeks of therapy with gabapentin, 900 to 1800 mg/d, or amitriptyline hydrochloride, 25 to 75 mg/d, with a 1-week washout before crossover. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pain relief measured by pain scale with verbal descriptors and global pain score assessment at treatment end. RESULTS: Participants and investigators were blinded throughout. Mean dosages were of gabapentin, 1565 mg/d, and of amitriptyline hydrochloride, 59 mg/d. Sixty-five percent of patients reached maximum dose with gabapentin and 54% with amitriptyline. Mean score diary analysis showed pain relief with gabapentin and amitriptyline was not significantly different (P = .26). Global data were obtained from 21 of 25 enrolled patients who completed the study. Moderate or greater pain relief was experienced in 11 (52%) of 21 patients with gabapentin and 14 (67%) of 21 patients with amitriptyline. There were no significant period or carry-over effects (P = .35). CONCLUSIONS: Although both drugs provide pain relief, mean pain score and global pain score data indicate no significant difference between gabapentin and amitriptyline. Gabapentin may be an alternative for treating diabetic peripheral neuropathy pain, yet does not appear to offer considerable advantage over amitriptyline and is more expensive. Larger trials are necessary to define gabapentin's place in treating diabetic peripheral neuropathy pain.

Acetates↗
PubMed2006

Off-label prescribing among office-based physicians.

BACKGROUND: Unlike medicines prescribed for Food and Drug Administration-approved indications, off-label uses may lack rigorous scientific scrutiny. Despite concerns about patient safety and costs to the health care system, little is known about the frequency of off-label drug use or the degree of scientific evidence supporting this practice. METHODS: We used nationally representative data from the 2001 IMS Health National Disease and Therapeutic Index (NDTI) to define prescribing patterns by diagnosis for 160 commonly prescribed drugs. Each reported drug-diagnosis combination was identified as Food and Drug Administration-approved, off-label with strong scientific support, or off-label with limited or no scientific support. Outcome measures included (1) the proportion of uses that were off-label and (2) the proportion of off-label uses supported by strong scientific evidence. Multivariate analyses were used to identify drug-specific characteristics predictive of increased off-label use. RESULTS: In 2001, there were an estimated 150 million (95% confidence interval, 127-173 million) off-label mentions (21% of overall use) among the sampled medications. Off-label use was most common among cardiac medications (46%, excluding antihyperlipidemic and antihypertensive agents) and anticonvulsants (46%), whereas gabapentin (83%) and amitriptyline hydrochloride (81%) had the greatest proportion of off-label use among specific medications. Most off-label drug mentions (73%; 95% confidence interval, 61%-84%) had little or no scientific support. Although several functional classes were associated with increased off-label use (P<.05), few other drug characteristics predicted off-label prescription. CONCLUSIONS: Off-label medication use is common in outpatient care, and most occurs without scientific support. Efforts should be made to scrutinize underevaluated off-label prescribing that compromises patient safety or represents wasteful medication use.

Adult↗
PubMed1981

Antifibrinolytic therapy in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. A report of the cooperative aneurysm study.

Antifibrinolytic therapy was used in 1,114 patients who had aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) and who were treated by the 13 institutions of the Cooperative Aneurysm Study. Patients were started on treatment within one week after SAH was diagnosed, and therapy was discontinued 14 days after the ictus. Rebleeding occurred in 10% of the treated patients. Overall mortality among the treated patients during the two weeks following hemorrhage was 10.7%. Though some minor and a few major side effects occurred, serious complications of therapy were infrequent.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1994

Long-term study with gabapentin in patients with drug-resistant epileptic seizures.

OBJECTIVE: To study the efficacy and safety of gabapentin in long-term treatment. DESIGN: A 4-year follow-up study of 25 patients with visits at 3-month intervals. SETTING: The patients were followed up in the outpatient unit of the University Hospital of Kuopio (Finland). PATIENTS: We treated 25 patients with drug-resistant complex partial seizures and secondarily generalized seizures in an open-label long-term study, using gabapentin as an additional means of therapy after a 3-month double-blind, placebo-controlled phase. Thirteen patients showed no benefit from gabapentin; the study medication was discontinued after 4 to 6 months of treatment. Of the 12 patients who responded enough to continue treatment, five were withdrawn due to different reasons, one because of loss of response. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The number of patients receiving the study drug in the follow-up and reduction of seizure frequency from baseline level as analyzed by the Wilcoxon test. RESULTS: Seven patients received gabapentin therapy for more than 4 years. The median follow-up time was 54 months. There was a significant reduction in seizure frequency throughout the follow-up period. Five of seven patients had a greater than 50% seizure frequency reduction at 4 years, representing 20% of the 25 patients who entered the study. CONCLUSIONS: Gabapentin possesses good efficacy in long-term treatment of patients with partial and secondarily generalized epileptic seizures. It is safe to use, and it is fairly well tolerated even in long-term treatment.

Acetates↗
PubMed1998

Increased seizure frequency associated with felbamate withdrawal in adults.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize changes in seizure frequency following felbamate withdrawal. DESIGN: Nonrandomized, retrospective chart review of a case series. SETTING: Epilepsy program specializing in adults with uncontrolled epilepsy. PATIENT POPULATION: Forty-five ambulatory patients withdrawn from felbamate use. Patients were included if they had received felbamate for at least 1 month, were 18 years or older, had accurate seizure frequency documentation, had accurate documentation of all antiepileptic drugs, and received the same concomitant antiepileptic drugs before and after felbamate therapy, except for the possible addition of gabapentin. Patients were excluded if they had hematologic or hepatic toxic effects with felbamate, were unable to withdraw from felbamate treatment, had a progressive neurologic disorder, or participated in another drug trial. METHODS: When information became available on aplastic anemia and hepatotoxicity associated with felbamate, all patients were advised to taper their felbamate dosage over approximately 2 weeks. They received written instructions for tapering felbamate and adjusting concomitant antiepileptic drugs and kept calendars to note the number of seizures. The charts of all patients who received felbamate were evaluated for adherence to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Statistical analysis was performed using a log-linear model for count data. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Seizure frequency during the 6 months before initiating felbamate therapy served as the baseline. Changes in seizure frequency were evaluated by comparing the number of seizures in the month felbamate was tapered and the 3 months after felbamate discontinuation with the baseline frequency. Comparisons were made between patients who started gabapentin therapy and those who did not and between felbamate responders and nonresponders. RESULTS: Felbamate withdrawal resulted in a significant (P=.02) increase in seizure frequency. Patients receiving gabapentin had a smaller increase in seizure frequency, but the difference was not statistically significant. There was no statistically significant difference in seizure frequency between felbamate responders and nonresponders. CONCLUSIONS: Felbamate withdrawal caused a significant increase in seizure frequency over the subsequent 3 months. These findings are important for clinical trial design and clinical practice.

Acetates↗
PubMed1998

New antiepileptic drugs.

The current developments in the availability of new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are unprecedented. After a period of many years during which no new AED became available, 5 new AEDs were introduced in the United States between 1993 and 1997, and 2 more are expected to be approved soon. These new drugs are a most welcome addition to the therapeutic options in the treatment of epilepsy, but they also create a dilemma for the clinician because their individual places and their optimal use in the treatment of various forms of epilepsy are yet to be determined. This review serves to summarize the main characteristics of the newer AEDs.

Acetates↗
PubMed1999

A randomized placebo-controlled comparative trial of gabapentin and propranolol in essential tremor.

BACKGROUND: New medication is needed to treat essential tremor. Preliminary evidence suggests that gabapentin may be effective in the treatment of this disorder. OBJECTIVE: To study the effects of gabapentin in a comparative, double-blind, crossover, placebo-controlled trial of patients who have essential tremor. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 16 patients with essential tremor (6 with a new onset and 10 with a 2-week washout period of previous treatment with propranolol hydrochloride) received gabapentin (Neurontin), 400 mg 3 times daily; propranolol hydrochloride, 40 mg 3 times daily; and placebo for 15 days with a 1-week washout period between treatments. MAJOR OUTCOME MEASURES: Major outcome evaluations consisted of a Tremor Clinical Rating Scale, accelerometric recordings, and a self-reported disability scale obtained before drug intake on study days 1 and 15 of each treatment period. In addition, the initial (day 1) and superimposed (day 15) drug effects were studied before and 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours after drug intake. RESULTS: At day 15, both gabapentin and propranolol demonstrated significant and comparable efficacy in reducing tremor from baseline in all tremor measures. The initial drug effects evaluated through accelerometry revealed no significant changes with the use of a placebo, but gabapentin and propranolol use significantly reduced tremor power. CONCLUSION: Gabapentin may be useful for the treatment of essential tremor.

Acetates↗
PubMed1999

A new twist for stopping the shakes? Revisiting GABAergic therapy for essential tremor.

Aside from physiological tremor, essential tremor (ET) is by far the most common cause of tremor in humans, affecting large numbers of individuals in every human population. The crude prevalence of ET has been conservatively estimated to be between 0.4% and 3.9%, although some estimates of the prevalence of ET among the elderly are higher than 20%. Essential tremor is the most prevalent adult-onset movement disorder, and is also regarded as one of the most common neurological disorders of adults, with a prevalence that is similar to or greater than that of stroke, Alzheimer disease, migraine headache, and lumbosacral pain syndromes. Essential tremor is as much as 20 times more prevalent than Parkinson disease.

Acetates↗
PubMed2000

Dystonia in a patient treated with propranolol and gabapentin.

We present a 68-year-old patient with essential tremor who was treated with propranolol hydrochloride (80 mg daily) and gabapentin (900 mg daily) after a history of mild success of gabapentin alone in relieving his symptoms. The patient had several daily episodes of paroxysmal dystonic movements in both hands. After reducing the propranolol dose to 40 mg daily, the dystonic movements resolved. This case suggests a synergistic effect between propranolol and gabapentin.

Acetates↗