Respirators--who's standing guard?
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · Search PubMed
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
This study examined worker tolerance and physiological responses to two levels of work while subjects wore various types of protective clothing and respirators. Nine healthy men (mean age = 24.8 years, weight = 75.3 kg, max VO2 = 44.6 mL/kg/min), experienced with the use of respirators, each performed a randomized series of eight experimental tests, each test scheduled to last 180 min. Work was performed on a motor-driven treadmill at a set walking speed and elevation indicative of either 30% (low work intensity) or 60% (high work intensity) of maximum work capacity for each individual. Four protective clothing ensembles were examined: light work clothing (LIGHT), light work clothing with SCBA (SCBA), firefighter's turnout gear with SCBA (FF) and chemical protective clothing with SCBA (CHEM). Physiological measurements included heart rate, skin and rectal temperature, and minute ventilation. Measurements were obtained every 2.5 min until test termination (tolerance time). If less than 180 min, tolerance time was defined by subjective or objective signs of near maximal stress. Mean tolerance times at the low work intensity were 167, 130, 26 and 73 min, respectively, for the LIGHT, SCBA, FF and CHEM ensembles. At the high intensity, mean tolerance times were 91, 23, 4 and 13 min, respectively. At the low work intensity, heart rate with SCBA rose very slowly during the tests and remained approximately 15 beats/min higher than the heart rate for subjects wearing the LIGHT ensemble. In contrast, heart rate with the FF and CHEM ensembles rose sharply and did not approach steady-state values.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
A case of contract sensitization to the ethylene oxide by a mask sterilized with this substance is reported. The mask was correctly sterilized but the ethylene oxide was not completely evaporised. The path tests were positive in the patient but negative in 25 control subjects. The patch tests with the international series and with all the elements of the mask were negative. The possible troubles of ethylene oxide and the sterylisation methodes of this substance are reviewed.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.