SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Projection”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,351 records · Page 75Linked to original sources

PubMed1990

Areal and laminar organization of corticocortical projections in the rat somatosensory cortex.

The present study examines patterns of connectivity between the primary somatosensory cortex of the rat (SI) and surrounding cortical areas also implicated in the processing of somatosensory information. The impetus for the study was the recent reports of major differences in the organization of cortex lateral and caudal to the SI in two other rodent species; the mouse (Carvell and Simons, '86: Somatosens. Res. 3:213-237; '87: J. Comp. Neurol. 265:409-427) and the grey squirrel (Krubitzer et al., '86: J. Comp. Neurol 250: 403-430). Corticocortical connections between the somatosensory areas of the rat parietal cortex were examined by using the combined retrograde and anterograde transport of horseradish peroxidase as well as the retrograde transport of fluorescent tracers. Tracer injections were made into different locations within SI and dysgranular cortex as well as into more lateral regions of parietal cortex. The tangential patterns of distribution both of callosal connections and of cytochrome oxidase activity together provided points of reference in determining the relation between injection sites and the resultant patterns of label. The results indicate that two distinct somatosensory areas, SI and the dysgranular cortex, are interconnected with a further lateral somatosensory area referred to as the second somatosensory area (SII). These projections are organized in a topographic fashion, which we interpret as evidence for a single representation of the body surface in SII. The three somatosensory areas each exhibit unique laminar patterns of ipsilateral corticocortical projection neurons and terminations. In SI, projection neurons are found mainly in layers II, III, and Va, and terminations are largely restricted to the infragranular layers. In the dysgranular cortex, projection neurons and terminations are found in all layers except layer I in which only terminal label is detectable and layer Vb in which notably fewer neurons are labelled. In SII, projection neurons and terminations are found in all layers except layer I and are particularly dense in lower layer III and layer IV. Further, whereas the laminar and areal distributions of ipsilateral and contralateral corticocortical projections largely overlap in both SI and the dysgranular cortex, in SII they tend to be areally segregated. Neurons projecting bilaterally to both ipsilateral and contralateral somatosensory cortex were equally rare in all three somatosensory areas. These results are discussed in relation to the organization of SII in other rodent species, and it is concluded that in the rat, like the mouse, cortex lateral and caudal to SI contains a single representation of the body surface.

Animals↗

PubMed1991

Diverse thalamic projections to the prefrontal cortex in the rhesus monkey.

We studied the sources of thalamic projections to prefrontal areas of nine rhesus monkeys with the aid of retrograde tracers (horseradish peroxidase or fluorescent dyes). Our goal was to determine the proportion of labeled neurons contributing to this projection system by the mediodorsal (MD) nucleus compared to those distributed in other thalamic nuclei, and to investigate the relationship of thalamic projections to specific architectonic areas of the prefrontal cortex. We selected areas for study within both the basoventral (areas 11, 12, and ventral 46) and the mediodorsal (areas 32, 14, 46, and 8) prefrontal sectors. This choice was based on our previous studies, which indicate differences in cortical projections to these two distinct architectonic sectors (Barbas, '88; Barbas and Pandya, '89). In addition, for each sector we included areas with different architectonic profiles, which is also relevant to the connectional patterns of the prefrontal cortices. The results showed that MD included a clear majority (over 80%) of all thalamic neurons directed to some prefrontal cortices (areas 11, 46, and 8); it contributed just over half to some others (areas 12 and 32), and less than a third to area 14. Clusters of neurons directed to basoventral and mediodorsal prefrontal areas were largely segregated within MD: the former were found ventrally, the latter dorsally. However, the most striking findings establish a relationship between thalamic origin and laminar definition of the prefrontal target areas. Most thalamic neurons directed to lateral prefrontal cortices, which are characterized by a high degree of laminar definition (areas 46 and 8), originated in the parvicellular and multiform subdivisions of MD, and only a few were found in other nuclei. In contrast, orbital and medial cortices, which have a low degree of laminar differentiation, were targeted by the magnocellular subdivision of MD and by numerous other limbic thalamic nuclei, including the midline and the anterior. Thus topographic specificity in the origin of thalamic projections increased as the laminar definition of the target area increased. Moreover, the rostrocaudal distribution of labeled neurons in MD and the medial pulvinar also differed depending on the degree of the laminar definition of the prefrontal target areas. The rostral parts of MD and the medial pulvinar projected to the eulaminate lateral prefrontal cortices, whereas their caudal parts projected to orbital and medial limbic cortices. Selective destruction of caudal MD is known to disrupt mnemonic processes in both humans and monkeys, suggesting that this thalamic-limbic prefrontal loop may constitute an important pathway for memory.

Animals↗

PubMed1992

Dorsal root ganglion neurons projecting to the dorsal column nuclei of rats.

Dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neurons may give origin to ascending branches that terminate in the dorsal column nuclei (DCN); uncertainties still exist with regard to the proportion of these neurons in different DRGs and to the type of these neurons. The percentage and size of neurons that project to the DCN were determined in a large number of DRGs by means of the retrograde transport of colloidal gold-labeled wheat germ agglutinin conjugated to enzymatically inactive horseradish peroxidase (WGAapoHRP-AU). A total of 16,239 neurons was tallied in 80 DRGs from nine rats; 3,240 (20%) of these were retrogradely labeled by the tracer injected in the DCN. Percentages of DCN projecting neurons vary considerably at different segmental levels: they are higher in cervical (up to 63%) than in thoracic (up to 31% for T1, up to 12% for thoracic DRGs below T1) or lumbar DRGs (up to 15%). At cervical levels highest percentages were encountered in C6, C7, and C8 and lowest percentages in C2-C4. At lumbar levels highest percentages were encountered in L4 and lowest in L1 and L6. When considering the soma size of DRG neurons it appears that: 1) there are more large cells, labeled and unlabeled, at cervical (38%) than at lumbar levels (30%) and more at lumbar than at thoracic levels (23%); 2) at every level, most labeled, i.e., projecting, neurons are large; and 3) DRGs with the highest proportions of large vs. small cells contain the highest percentages of DCN projecting neurons. These results represent the first attempt at establishing the percentages and soma size of DCN projecting neurons from a large number of DRGs and at comparing the contribution to these nuclei from cervical, thoracic, and lumbar DRGs. Some of the differences in the ratio of projecting neurons at different levels may be explained on the basis of well-known anatomical features, e.g., the projections to the Clarke's column of many DRG neurons in lumbar ganglia. The contribution of virtually exclusively large DRG neurons to the DCN, suggested by indirect or incomplete evidence, is demonstrated by the present retrograde labeling and soma size measurements. The results relate to the functional component of peripheral receptors that relay their input via the dorsal columns and do not seem to support a recent suggestion that a sizeable fraction of unmyelinated primary afferents ascend in the dorsal columns to terminate in the DCN.

Animals↗

PubMed1992

GABAergic and non-GABAergic projections of accessory optic nuclei, including the visual tegmental relay zone, to the nucleus of the optic tract and dorsal terminal accessory optic nucleus in rat.

This study examines the non-gamma-amino butyric acid (GABA)ergic (group I neurons) and GABAergic neurons (group II neurons) of the accessory optic system projecting to the nucleus of the optic tract (NOT)/dorsal terminal nucleus (DTN) of the accessory optic system in rat. These nuclei include the dorsal (MTNd) and ventral (MTNv) divisions of the medial terminal nucleus, the lateral terminal nucleus, the interstitial nucleus of the superior fasciculus, the posterior fibers, and the visual tegmental relay zone. GABAergic neurons of these nuclei that do not target the NOT/DTN (group III neurons) have also been observed. The fluorescent retrograde tracer fluoro-gold was injected into the pretectum, targeting the NOT/DTN and the tissue prepared immunocytochemically to reveal neurons containing the neurotransmitter GABA. Three groups of neurons (groups I, II, and III neurons) were examined in terms of their distribution, density, and percentage present. Group I neurons are single-labeled with fluoro-gold and represent non-GABAergic neurons projecting to the NOT/DTN. These neurons are of the highest density in the lateral terminal nucleus (204 neurons/mm2). Their densities are also substantial in the MTNv (120 neurons/mm2), interstitial nucleus of the superior fasciculus, posterior fibers (96 neurons/mm2), and visual tegmental relay zone (93 neurons/mm2). Group II neurons are double-labeled with fluoro-gold and GABA. They form a system of GABAergic neurons projecting to the NOT/DTN, which are exceedingly dense in the MTNd (78 neurons/mm2) but are also dense in both the visual tegmental relay zone (49 neurons/mm2) and MTNv (33 neurons/mm2). Group III neurons are GABAergic neurons that do not target the NOT/DTN but must project to other brain nuclei and/or be interneurons. These are of extremely high concentration in the visual tegmental relay zone (316 neurons/mm2) and are also of substantial densities in the MTNd (77 neurons/mm2), lateral terminal nucleus (72 neurons/mm2), and MTNv (44 neurons/mm2). The MTNd has the highest percentage of GABAergic neurons projecting to the NOT/DTN (72%). GABAergic neurons also form significant percentages of the projections to the NOT/DTN from the visual tegmental relay zone (34%) and MTNv (21%). The percentage of the total GABAergic neurons that project to the NOT/DTN is the highest in the MTNd (50%) and MTNv (42%). The described GABAergic afferents to the NOT/DTN may function to process information concerned with the compensation for retinal slip.

Animals↗

PubMed1992

Projections from the laterodorsal nucleus of the thalamus to the limbic and visual cortices in the rat.

The laterodorsal nucleus (LD) of the thalamus is an important source of thalamic afferents to the limbic cortex, but the topography and lamination of these projections has not been investigated in detail. Using the anterograde transport of Phaseolus vulgaris leucoagglutinin and Fluoro-Ruby, the present study demonstrates that in the rat, LD projects to infraradiata, precentral agranular, retrosplenial, visual (area 18b), subicular, and entorhinal cortices. Each subregion of LD has a distinct pattern of terminals within these cortical areas. The rostral part and the dorsalmost part of LD project densely to retrosplenial granular a (Rga) cortex, presubiculum and parasubiculum. Slightly more caudal parts of dorsal LD project primarily to the postsubiculum. More ventral parts of LD project primarily to retrosplenial dysgranular (Rdg) and retrosplenial granular b (Rgb) cortices. The projection of LD to area 18b originates from cells in the caudalmost part of LD. In each cortical region, LD terminals display distinct laminar patterns. In area 18b and the adjacent Rdg cortex, the LD terminal field is in layers I, III, and IV, but in both the Rgb and Rga cortices the terminal field is located predominantly in layer I. In the postsubiculum the LD terminals are distributed to layers I and III/IV and extend into superficial layer V; in the presubiculum and the parasubiculum the LD terminals are only in the deep layers (i.e., layers IV-VI). A small number of LD axons terminate in the deep layers (i.e., layers IV-VI) of the medial entorhinal cortex. These results indicate that each area of LD has a distinct projection to limbic and adjacent neocortex.

Afferent Pathways↗

PubMed1993

Vestibular primary afferent projection to the cerebellum of the rabbit.

The vestibular primary afferent projection to the cerebellum of the rabbit was studied with retrograde and orthograde tracers. We injected individual lobules of the cerebellum with horseradish peroxidase (HRP) or wheat germ agglutinin-HRP (WGA-HRP). Following these injections the numbers of labeled and unlabeled cells in Scarpa's ganglion were counted. Approximately 64-89% of the cells in Scarpa's ganglion were labeled retrogradely following uvula-nodular injections. About 2% of the cells in the ipsilateral Scarpa's ganglion were labeled after injections of the flocculus. Virtually no cells were labeled following injections of the ventral paraflocculus. The vestibular primary afferent projection to the uvula-nodulus is so extensive that it must be part of a collateral system that also innervates the vestibular nuclei. This collateral projection pattern was confirmed by using fluorescent tracers injected into the uvula-nodulus and vestibular complex. Fluorogold was injected into the uvula-nodulus and peroxidase-rhodamine isothiocyanate was injected into the vestibular complex. More than 50% of the neurons in Scarpa's ganglion were double labeled by these subtotal injections. The dense vestibular primary afferent projection to the uvula-nodulus was confirmed by using the C fragment of tetanus toxin (TTC) injected into the labyrinth as an orthograde tracer. With the TTC technique, the vestibular primary afferent projection to the uvula-nodulus terminated exclusively in the ipsilateral granule cell layer of lobules 9d and 10. Much sparser vestibular primary afferent projections were found in the banks of major cerebellar sulci. A barely detectable projection was found to the flocculus and ventral paraflocculus.

Afferent Pathways↗

PubMed1993

Correlation between the receptive fields of locust interneurons, their dendritic morphology, and the central projections of mechanosensory neurons.

The relationships between the morphology and receptive fields of local and intersegmental interneurons that process mechanosensory information from a hindleg of the locust have been analysed. Sensory neurons from tactile hairs project to ventral areas of neuropil in the metathoracic ganglion where they form a 3-dimensional somatotopic map of a hindleg. By contrast, sensory neurons from a proprioceptor at the femoro-tibial joint (the femoral chordotonal organ) project to lateral and more intermediate areas of neuropil and have no branches in the most ventral regions of neuropil. Particular local and intersegmental interneurons respond to stimulation of specific arrays of hairs on a hindleg, or to movements of particular joints. Their receptive fields are defined, in part, by the patterns of excitatory, monosynaptic connections made by these afferents. Each interneuron has a characteristic receptive field and a characteristic morphology defined by its array of branches in the regions of neuropil containing the projections of the afferents that provide its monosynaptic inputs. Interneurons with inputs exclusively from tactile hairs have branches in the most ventral regions of neuropil, while those with exclusively proprioceptive inputs have branches only in more intermediate levels of neuropil. Interneurons with extensive receptive fields from tactile hairs also have extensive areas of branching within the ventral neuropil. Interneurons with receptive fields restricted to particular regions of the leg have branches restricted to the ventral region of neuropil containing the projections of afferents from that part of the leg. Thus, interneurons with inputs only from hairs on the tarsus have branches in the posterior region of neuropil corresponding to the projections of the tarsal afferents, while interneurons with receptive fields on the femur have branches in more anterior regions of neuropil corresponding to the projections of the femoral hair afferents. Interneurons with receptive fields on the tibia have branches in neuropil between the tarsal and femoral projections.

Afferent Pathways↗

PubMed1993

Ipsilateral cortical projections to areas 3a, 3b, and 4 in the macaque monkey.

In the macaque monkey area 3a of the cerebral cortex separates area 4, a primary motor cortical field, from somatosensory area 3b, which has a subcortical input mainly from cutaneous mechanoreceptive neurons. That each of these cortical areas has a unique thalamic input was illustrated in the preceding paper. In the present experiments the cortical afferent projections to these 3 areas of the sensorimotor cortex monkey were visualized and compared, using 4 differentiable fluorescent dyes as axonal retrogradely transported labels. The cortical projection patterns to areas 3a, 3b, and 4 were similar in that they each consisted of (a) a "halo" of input from the immediately surrounding cortex, and (b) discrete projections from one or more remote cortical areas. However, the pattern of remote inputs from precentral, mesial, and posterior parietal cortex was different for each of the 3 cortical target areas. The cortical input configuration was least complex for area 3b, its remote input projecting mainly from insular cortex. The pattern of discrete cortical inputs to the motor area 4, however, was more complex, with projections from the cingulate motor area (24c/d), the supplementary motor area, postarcuate cortex, insular cortex, and postcentral areas 2/5. Area 3a, in addition to the proximal projections from the immediately surrounding cortex, also received input from the supplementary motor area, cingulate motor cortex, insular cortex, and areas 2/5. Thus, this pattern of cortical input to area 3a resembled more closely that of the adjacent motor rather than that of the somatosensory area 3b. Contrasting with this, however, the thalamic input to area 3a was largely from somatosensory VPLc (abbreviations from Olszewski [1952] The Thalamus of the Macaca mulatta. Basel: Karger) and not from VPLo (with input from cerebellum, and projecting to precentral motor areas).

Aging↗

PubMed1993

Secondary olfactory projections and pallial topography in the Pacific hagfish, Eptatretus stouti.

The extent of the secondary olfactory projections shows great variation among different groups of craniates. Gnathostomes typically display restricted secondary olfactory projections, whereas lampreys have more extensive projections. Any attempt to determine the phylogenetic polarity of these characters, that is, to decide which is primitive and which is derived, requires an investigation of the secondary olfactory system in the sister group of lampreys and gnathostomes, the hagfishes. Therefore the secondary olfactory projections of the Pacific hagfish, Eptatretus stouti, were traced with the use of horseradish peroxidase and the lipophilic fluorescent tracing compound DiI. The projections are bilateral and massive to all pallial areas and the septum, moderate to the striatum, and relatively weak to the preoptic and infundibular regions of the hypothalamus, reaching caudally to the diencephalic-mesencephalic boundary. Afferents to the olfactory bulb arise from the pallium, the preoptic area, and the ventral thalamus. We compare the secondary olfactory projections in hagfishes with those in lampreys and in gnathostomes, and we conclude that the presence of extensive secondary olfactory projections is a primitive character of craniate brains.

Animals↗

PubMed1994

Direct and indirect retinohypothalamic projections to the supraoptic nucleus in the female albino rat.

Earlier studies have shown that retinohypothalamic projections terminate extensively within the hypothalamus of the rat. Recently, we identified a light retinal projection to the supraoptic nucleus as well as a larger, well-focused projection resulting in a peri-supraoptic nucleus terminal field. In this study, we employed a double labeling method with cholera toxin conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (CT-HRP) and pseudorabies virus, a transsynaptic neural tracer, to evaluate retinorecipient neurons in both the supraoptic nucleus and peri-supraoptic nucleus terminal field. In addition, we looked for evidence that cells in the peri-supraoptic nucleus terminal field project into the supraoptic nucleus. Three strains of pseudorabies virus were compared. A direct retinosupraoptic nucleus circuit was confirmed with all three strains. Retinorecipient neurons in the peri-supraoptic nucleus terminal field were also confirmed. However, there was a strain-based difference in the identification of these neurons. The wild-type Becker strain labeled cells in the peri-supraoptic nucleus terminal field in a manner paralleling the early, intermediate and late stages of infection of the suprachiasmatic nucleus. This parallel time course suggests that retinal ganglion cells terminate directly on cells in the peri-supraoptic nucleus terminal field. Conversely, the Bartha and PRV-91 strains showed appreciable labeling of peri-supraoptic neurons only at long survival times. This longer time course suggests that these mutant strains label neurons in the peri-supraoptic nucleus terminal field indirectly, after passing through additional neurons. In addition, experiments with monocular injection of CT-HRP and posterior pituitary injection of pseudorabies virus showed retrogradely labeled second-order cells in the peri-supraoptic nucleus amidst the CT-HRP labeled terminal field of the retinohypothalamic tract. These results demonstrate a direct projection from the retina to the supraoptic nucleus and provide evidence for an indirect circuit from the retina to the supraoptic nucleus via neurons located in the peri-supraoptic nucleus terminal field. The strain-based differences imply that those retinal ganglion cells that project to the peri-supraoptic nucleus terminal field differ from those that project to the suprachiasmatic nucleus. In addition, these results suggest a neuroanatomic basis for photic effects on physiological mechanisms that are not mediated by the circadian timing system.

Animals↗

PubMed1994

Organization of the efferent projections from the pontine parabrachial area to the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis and neighboring regions: a PHA-L study in the rat.

The organization of efferent projections from the pontine parabrachial (pPB) area to the forebrain rostral to the central nucleus of the amygdala (Ce) was studied in the rat by using microinjections of Phaseolus vulgaris leucoagglutinin (PHA-L), into subregions of the pPB area. The present study is a follow-up of a former study (Bernard et al. [1993] J. Comp. Neurol. 329:201-229) which examines pPB projections onto the Ce. The results demonstrate that: (1) the pPB(m) region (the medial, the ventral lateral subnuclei and the waist area) diffusely projects to the lateral division (BSTL) of the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BST), the Ce-BSTL continuum (including, the dorsal portion of substantia innominata, the ventral portion of globus pallidus, the fundus striatum, and the substriatal area) and to a lesser extent the agranular insular cortex; (2) the pPB(1) region [the central lateral (pPBcl) and the outer portion of external lateral subnuclei] densely projects to the dorsal lateral subnucleus of BST (BSTdl); only the pPBcl subnucleus projects to the median, the anteroventral and the periventricular nuclei of the preoptic hypothalamus; and (3) the remaining pPB area (the dorsal lateral, part of the external lateral and the external medial subnuclei) projects to the nucleus of horizontal limb of diagonal band but does not project onto the BST and the preoptic hypothalamus. It is suggested that the pPB(m)-BSTL "diffuse pathway" is mainly implicated in motivational and autonomic aspects of taste. The pPB(1)-BSTdl and hypothalamic "concentrated pathways" could be implicated in autonomic and nociceptive processes.

Amygdala↗

PubMed1994

Intra-amygdaloid projections of the lateral nucleus in the cat: PHA-L anterograde labeling combined with postembedding GABA and glutamate immunocytochemistry.

Research on the implication of the amygdala in classical fear conditioning suggests that the central amygdaloid nucleus is the output station of the amygdala for conditioned fear responses, while the lateral nucleus acts as the input nucleus, at least for auditory conditioned stimuli. However, the nature and locus of the plastic changes taking place between these two nuclei are unknown partly because the neurotransmitter(s) used by intra-amygdaloid projections of the lateral nucleus has not been identified. To address this issue in cats, anterograde tracing with Phaseolus vulgaris-leucoagglutinin (PHA-L) was combined with postembedding immunocytochemistry for gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) and glutamate. Two sectors can be recognized in the lateral nucleus of the cat: a shell located laterally along the external capsule, and a core. Iontophoretic injections of PHA-L in these two sectors revealed that they have nonoverlapping intra-amygdaloid targets with the exception of a common projection to the central lateral nucleus. The core projects mainly to itself and to the basomedial nucleus, whereas the shell contributes a massive projection to the basolateral nucleus. No projection of the lateral nucleus to the central medial nucleus was found. Electron microscopically, PHA-L-labeled axon terminals in the lateral, basomedial, basolateral, and central lateral nuclei as well as in the perirhinal and insular cortices formed asymmetric synapses (100%; n = 289) with dendritic spines (77-100%). Moreover, postembedding immunocytochemistry revealed that PHA-L-labeled axon terminals are immunoreactive for glutamate but not GABA. Since most amygdaloid projections to the brainstem originate in the central medial nucleus, these results suggest that intra-amygdaloid targets of the lateral nucleus are involved in the transmission of auditory conditioned stimuli to the central medial nucleus. Moreover, these findings imply that intra-amygdaloid projections of the lateral nucleus use glutamate but not GABA as a neurotransmitter.

Amygdala↗

PubMed1994

Projections to the cochlear nuclei from principal cells in the medial nucleus of the trapezoid body in guinea pigs.

Spherical and globular cells in the cochlear nucleus provide input to the cell groups in the superior olivary complex devoted to the analysis of binaural cues. Descending projections from the superior olivary complex appear to inhibit the spherical and globular cells. It is not known which of the numerous cell types in the superior olive provide this descending input, but recent studies have shown that some of the cells are located in the medial nucleus of the trapezoid body (MTB). The present experiments were designed to determine whether the MTB projections arise from principal cells, which are known to play a role in sound localization, and to determine whether their projections terminate on spherical or globular cells. Principal cells in the MTB are characterized by their contacts with synaptic specializations called calyces, which arise from the axons of cells in the contralateral cochlear nucleus. In the first experiment, a fluorescent tracer was injected into one cochlear nucleus to label the calyces anterogradely. A different tracer was injected into the opposite cochlear nucleus to label cells retrogradely in the MTB. In every case, some of the labeled cells were enveloped by a labeled calyx, demonstrating that principal cells do project to the cochlear nucleus. In the second experiment, fluorescent tracers were injected into different parts of the cochlear nucleus. Analysis of the distribution of labeled cells suggested that MTB projections selectively target the globular cell region of the cochlear nucleus. In a third experiment, the axonal arborizations arising from this projection were labeled with biocytin or wheat germ agglutinin conjugated to horseradish peroxidase. Labeled boutons appeared to contact globular cells but not spherical cells. Multipolar cells in the ventral cochlear nucleus and cells in the dorsal cochlear nucleus were also contacted. The results suggest that MTB projections to the cochlear nucleus arise largely from principal cells and contact, at least in part, cells in the cochlear nucleus that give rise to ascending pathways involved in sound localization.

Animals↗

PubMed1994

Normal activity-dependent refinement in a compressed retinotectal projection in goldfish.

When the optic nerve in a goldfish is crushed, regenerating fibers can reform a normal retinotopic projection. Two processes are thought to generate this retinotopic order. One is an activity-independent process, presumed to be some form of substrate-directed growth, which generates rough retinotopy as seen in the early formed projection. The other is an activity-dependent process that generates fine retinotopy during a protracted period of refinement. This projection also displays two other behaviors. One is retinotopic plasticity, in which optic fibers can compensate for retinal or tectal ablations by expanding or compressing into the available tectal space while preserving retinotopic order. These plasticities can dramatically alter the scale of the projection. The other behavior is the formation of fixed synaptic sites in tectum. Optic fibers make a characteristic number of synaptic connections in tectum, which is not changed by increasing the number of invading optic fibers. This has been interpreted to mean that fibers compete for limited synaptic sites. How the two processes that generate order, substrate-directed growth, and activity-dependent refinement might each be affected by the expression of retinotopic plasticity and altered synaptic competition is largely unknown. In particular, it is not known how fine retinotopic order (activity-dependent refinement) might be affected by altering the scale of the projection. Would optic fibers from neighboring ganglion cells converge into the same-sized area of tectum, or would they expand or compress in proportion to the altered scale of the overall map? To explore this issue, the posterior half of tectum of goldfish was removed, and the optic nerve was crushed, thereby forcing regenerating fibers to form a compressed retinotopic projection onto the anterior half of tectum. Under these conditions, optic fibers are also forced to compete for half the normal number of synaptic sites. The effect on retinotopy was monitored at various times during regeneration by making a small spot injection of wheat germ agglutinin-horseradish peroxidase (WGA-HRP) into nasal retina corresponding to fibers that would normally terminate in the missing posterior half of tectum. To distinguish between activity-dependent and activity-independent processes, retinal impulse activity was blocked in some animals by repeated intraocular injections of tetrodotoxin. The initial projection was found to be unaffected by impulse activity. Regardless of activity, nasal fibers failed initially to grow to the most posterior available regions, but instead were dispersed across much of the "incorrect" anterior half of tectum at 30 days.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Animals↗

PubMed1994

Relationship of thalamic basal forebrain projection neurons to the peptidergic innervation of the midline thalamus.

To better understand the input-output organization of the midline thalamus, we compared the distribution of its peptidergic and monoaminergic afferents, which were visualized by using immunocytochemistry, with the distribution of neurons projecting to different basal forebrain structures, which were mapped using retrograde fluorescent tracers. Serotonin and most of the peptides were found throughout paraventricular thalamic nucleus (PV) and in other midline and intralaminar nuclei (type 1 pattern). Neuropeptide Y, alpha MSH and the catecholamine synthetic enzymes were largely restricted to dorsolateral PV (type 2 pattern). Vasopressin was found in dorsomedial PV and intermediodorsal nucleus in a pattern complementary to the type 2 distribution (type 3 pattern). Neurons projecting to accumbens core were present in paraventricular, intermediodorsal, and other midline nuclei. Neurons projecting to accumbens shell and to central amygdaloid nucleus were found in dorsal PV. The peptidergic zones were only loosely correlated with the distribution of different classes of projection neurons. The type 2 pattern overlapped best with neurons projecting to accumbens shell, and to a lesser extent to central amygdaloid nucleus, while the type 3 pattern overlapped best with neurons projecting to core of accumbens. This partial overlap suggests that some brainstem and hypothalamic nuclei preferentially affect different basal forebrain targets through the midline thalamus, and may allow, for example, information about stress to specifically influence accumbens shell and central amygdaloid nucleus. Nevertheless, most of the peptidergic afferents (type 1 pattern) to midline thalamus cover neurons projecting throughout the basal forebrain, which suggests that all of these neurons receive a variety of brainstem and hypothalamic inputs.

Afferent Pathways↗

PubMed1994

Visual and somatosensory inputs to the avian song system via nucleus uvaeformis (Uva) and a comparison with the projections of a similar thalamic nucleus in a nonsongbird, Columba livia.

Nucleus uvaeformis (Uva), previously identified as a component of song control circuitry in songbirds, and nucleus dorsolateralis posterior thalami, pars caudalis (DLPc) in pigeon, were compared with respect to their relative positions in the dorsolateral part of the posterior thalamus, their cell types, and their afferent and efferent projections. Both nuclei are closely related to the habenulointerpeduncular tract, have similar cell types, and receive a dense projection from deep layers of the optic tectum, predominantly ipsilaterally, and a distinct projection from the dorsal column and external cuneate nuclei, predominantly contralaterally. Recordings of multiple unit activity evoked by visual and somatosensory stimuli were used to guide injections of tracer into either DLPc or Uva, and the projections to the telencephalon were charted. Both nuclei were found to have a major terminal field in the medial part of the ipsilateral neostriatum intermedium (NI), known as nucleus interfacialis (NIf) in songbirds, and a minor terminal field in the roof of the neostriatum caudale (NC). In pigeon, the DLPc terminations in NC were within a region known as neostriatum dorsale (Nd), and, in male songbirds, the Uva terminations were in the high vocal center (HVC). Recordings of visual and somatosensory evoked activity were then used to guide injections of tracer into NI, and the afferent and efferent projections were again compared in pigeon and songbirds. The projections from either DLPc or Uva were confirmed, and terminal fields were observed either in Nd in pigeon, the dorsolateral part of NC in female songbirds, or HVC in male songbirds. Injections of tracer into either Nd or HVC confirmed their sources of afferents in DLPc or Uva, respectively, and in NI, but there was incomplete overlap of the distribution of retrogradely labelled cells in NI and the terminal fields of DLPc or Uva. It is concluded that DLPc and Uva are comparable nuclei having similar afferent and efferent projections relaying visual and somatosensory information to the telencephalon. The possible role of this information in vocal control is discussed.

Animals↗

PubMed1994

Primate cingulostriatal projection: limbic striatal versus sensorimotor striatal input.

The organization of the projections from the cingulate cortex to the striatum in the monkey was studied using the retrograde tracers Lucifer Yellow conjugated to dextran amines and horseradish peroxidase conjugated to wheat germ agglutinin. These tracers were injected into the different regions of the ventral (limbic) striatum and the dorsal (sensorimotor) striatum. The shell region of the nucleus accumbens was defined using calbindin-D28K immunohistochemistry. Following injections into the ventral striatum, there are numerous retrogradely labeled neurons in the various regions of the primate cingulate cortex, most of which are derived from layer V. The cytoarchitectural subdivisions of cingulate cortex include the anterior cingulate cortex, areas 25, 24a-c, and 24a'-c', and the posterior cingulate cortex, areas 23a-c, 29, 30, and 31. There is a topographical organization of the projections from these different cingulate areas to the ventral and dorsal striatum. The medial ventral striatum receives input from the rostral part of the anterior cingulate cortex (areas 25 and 24a,b). The shell region of the nucleus accumbens receives fibers from areas 25, 24a,b, and 24a',b'. Projections to the central ventral striatum including the core of the nucleus accumbens are derived primarily from areas 25, 24a, 24b, and the medial part of area 24c. However, few labeled cells are detected in areas 24c and 24c'. The lateral ventral striatum receives input primarily from areas 24b, 24b' and 23b and medial portion of area 24c. The medial ventral striatum and the shell of the nucleus accumbens have a similar distribution of labeled cells, such that these regions derive their input almost entirely from the rostral anterior cingulate cortex. In contrast to the ventral striatum, the dorsal sensorimotor striatum receives projections from areas 24c, 24c' 23c and 31. These arise primarily from the lateral portion of lower bank and the fundus of the cingulate sulcus. Our results demonstrate that areas 24c, 24c' and 23c, the lateral portion of the lower bank and the fundus of the cingulate sulcus project to the dorsal sensorimotor striatum. The medial portion of the lower bank of the cingulate cortex projects to the ventral striatum including the core of the nucleus accumbens. Different projections to striatum from discrete subdivisions of cingulate cortex indicate that these areas are heterogeneous and have different functions such that the fundus of the cingulate sulcus is related to skeletomotor function, whereas the medial portion of the lower bank of the cingulate sulcus is associated with the limbic-related and association cortical function.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Animals↗

PubMed1994

GABAergic and non-GABAergic neurons in the nucleus of the optic tract project to the superior colliculus: an ultrastructural retrograde tracer and immunocytochemical study in the rabbit.

Both the nucleus of the optic tract (NOT) and the superior colliculus (SC) are thought to play important roles in the regulation of eye movements. The superior colliculus contributes to visual orientation and saccades, and the nucleus of the optic tract contributes to the detection of slow movements of the visual surround. Recently, a GABAergic projection has been described between these two nuclei in the cat, a species with frontal vision. The present study aimed at determining whether a similar GABAergic pathway exists in the rabbit, a species with lateral vision. To study this pathway we used the retrograde tracer cholera-toxin (CTB) to identify NOT neurons projecting to the SC and GABA-antibody immunostaining to identify GABA-containing neurons and processes. CTB injections into the superficial laminae of the SC showed that GABAergic and non-GABAergic neurons in the NOT project to the SC. Both types of neurons have structural characteristics similar to other projection neurons in the NOT. In contrast to the NOT neurons projecting to the inferior olive (IO) which are mainly located in the rostral NOT, the GABAergic and non-GABAergic NOT-SC neurons are situated throughout the nucleus. The somata and principal dendrites of both neuron types receive numerous synaptic contacts from GABAergic terminals and only a few from retinals. The NOT projection neurons to the SC thus establish prominent excitatory and inhibitory links between the two structures, suggesting the existence of separate circuits that could interact through a GABAergic and non-GABAergic NOT-SC projection. It is further suggested that these circuits may be involved in the regulation of saccades in the SC during optokinetic nystagmus.

Animals↗