Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Interphase”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,351 records · Page 75Linked to original sources

Non-random radial arrangements of interphase chromosome territories: evolutionary considerations and functional implications.

In the nucleus of animal and plant cells individual chromosomes maintain a compartmentalized structure. Chromosome territories (CTs), as these structures were named by Theodor Boveri, are essential components of the higher-order chromatin architecture. Recent studies in mammals and non-mammalian vertebrates indicate that the radial position of a given CT (or segments thereof) is correlated with its size, its gene-density and its replication timing. As a representative case, chicken cell nuclei show highly consistent radial chromatin arrangements: gene-rich, early replicating microchromosomes are clustered within the nuclear interior, while gene-poor, later replicating macrochromosomes are preferentially located at the nuclear periphery. In humans, chromosomes 18 and 19 (HSA18 and 19) territories that are of similar size show a distinctly different position in the cell nuclei of lymphocytes and lymphoblastoid cells: the gene-rich and early replicating HSA19 CTs are typically found close to the nuclear center, while the gene-poor and later replicating HSA18 CTs are preferentially located at the nuclear periphery. Recent comparative maps between human and chicken chromosomes revealed that the chicken macrochromosomes 2 and Z contain the genes homologous to HSA18, while the genes on HSA19 are located onto the chicken microchromosomes. These data lend tentative support to the hypothesis that differences in the radial nuclear positions of gene-rich, early replicating and gene-poor, later replicating chromatin have been evolutionarily conserved during a period of more than 300 million years irrespective of the evolution of highly divergent karyotypes between humans and chicken.

Animals↗

Interphase cytogenetics in mammographically detected breast lesions.

Chromosomal aneuploidy in 25 mammographically detected breast lesions (MDBL) were determined on cytological smears using directly labeled pericentromeric probes for chromosomes 7 to 12, 17, 18 and X. The lesions included seven nonproliferative (NP) lesions, seven atypical hyperplasias (AHs), and 11 carcinomas (CAs). No other significant histological findings were identified in the remaining specimens except in two mammographically detected NP lesions, where foci of AH were present in adjacent sections; therefore, these two specimens were included in the AH lesion group (moderately increased risk lesions). Corresponding tissue sections were evaluated, and the results were correlated with fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) results. Monosomy was defined as the loss of one signal in > or = 15% of cells, and trisomy or tetrasomy was defined by the presence of three or more signals in > or = 3% of cells. Chromosomal aberrations were detected in 2 of 5 NP, 9 of 9 AH, and 11 of 11 CA groups. The mean number of cells with three or more signals, for all chromosomes, was 1.04 +/- 0.9 in the NP group, 8.5 +/- 9.4 in the AH group, and 20.2 +/- 5.4 in the CAs. A significant statistical difference was noted between the different groups (P = .0001). Chromosomal gain was the most common aberration and involved all chromosomes. The X chromosome was the only individual chromosome with significant differences in NP, AH, and CA groups. Chromosomal loss was observed in five specimens (20%) and involved chromosomes 8, 10, 17, and 18. The authors conclude (1) significant chromosomal aberrations can be detected in AH lesions and in NP epithelium from patients with moderately increased risk lesions; (2) numerical chromosomal aberrations tend to increase with progression of disease; (3) the frequent chromosomal gains/losses involving AH suggest that some AH may display submicroscopic features of malignancy; and (4) combined chromosomal aberrations allow for significant categorization of breast lesions, especially in cytology specimens.

Adult↗

Understanding nuclear receptor function: from DNA to chromatin to the interphase nucleus.

The regulation of gene expression by steroid receptors is the fundamental mechanism by which these important bioregulatory molecules exert their action. As such, mechanisms utilized by receptors in the modulation of genetic expression have been intensively studied since the first identification of hormone-binding proteins. Although these mechanisms include both posttranscriptional (1) and posttranslational (2) components, the primary level of control involves direct modulation of the rate of transcription, and it is this process that has been the major focus of research in the field.

Animals↗

Comparison of comparative genomic hybridization and interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization in ovarian carcinomas: possibilities and limitations of both techniques.

Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) is a valuable technique for cytogenetic analysis of solid tumors. To evaluate the reliability of CGH, we examined DNA of 10 ovarian carcinomas after CGH analysis with single- and double-locus fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). The FISH experiments, involving 5 chromosomes (chromosomes 3, 6, 8, 12, and 18) with different FISH probes, confirmed the CGH results in 66.2% of cases (92 of 139 investigated loci). In 4 patients, inconsistent results (41 loci) were related to polyploidy, because CGH cannot detect polyploid karyotypes. The remaining 6 discordant loci can be referred to limitations in both techniques. Re-evaluation of FISH and CGH results by one other is therefore recommended to overcome these technical artifacts. Nevertheless, CGH is of potential value in characterizing chromosomal alterations and might help in generating tumor-specific sets of FISH probes to obtain genetic information of prognostic value within a few days.

Chromosomes, Human↗

Standardization criteria for the detection of BCR/ABL fusion in interphase nuclei of chronic myelogenous leukemia patients by fluorescence in situ hybridization.

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), as a new clinical test, is not presently standardized. For practical reasons, each laboratory must build its own criteria. In this work, we present our standardization criteria for clinical practice, which include not only the methods for cell fixation, specimen preparation, and hybridization conditions, but mainly the definition of false-positive range and the scoring criteria of microscopic analysis. These include signal assessment, difference between individual microscopists, evaluation of specimen homogeneity, and the minimum number of scored nuclei required for a clinically reliable result. For this purpose, we analyzed by FISH 24 healthy volunteer donors, 31 patients affected by non-chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) hematological malignancies, 47 CML patients at diagnosis, and 82 CML patients during treatment for the BCR/ABL fusion. In this article, we present several quality control and assurance methods that can be useful in providing standardization of the FISH technique.

Cell Nucleus↗

Fluorescence in situ hybridization BCR/ABL fusion signal rate in interphase nuclei of healthy volunteer donors: a test study for establishing false positive rate.

Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using chromosome-specific DNA probes is rapidly becoming a part of clinical laboratory practice. However, as a relatively new clinical test, it is not yet standardized and for practical reasons each laboratory must establish its own criteria. For this purpose we have evaluated the specificity of a dual-color BCR/ABL translocation probe by establishing the range of BCR/ABL fusion-positive scores in a healthy donor group. The false positive rate (FPR), determined by the percent of FISH BCR/ABL fusion-positive cells found in the specimens of healthy donors, was estimated at 2.3% (mean = 1%-4%). Thus the cut-off value for false positive nuclei was set at 5%.

Adolescent↗

Detection of trisomy 8 using conventional cytogenetic techniques and interphase FISH analysis in 34 myeloid disorders: a comparative study.

Trisomy for chromosome 8 is one of the most common chromosome abnormalities detected in myeloid disorders. However, and despite its great incidence, its biologic significance remains poorly understood. Recently, some reports have shown the existence of masked trisomy 8 in myeloid disorders. To try to detect occult trisomy 8, we performed a study in which 34 myeloid disorders with apparent normal karyotypes using conventional cytogenetic techniques were analyzed using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis. Masked trisomy 8 was not detected in any of the 34 cases studied. This suggests that trisomy 8 may be a rare event in myeloid disorders in which an optimal conventional cytogenetic analysis has been performed. The acquisition of trisomy 8 either in early neoplastic stages in some cases or in late neoplastic stages in others and the absence of masked trisomy 8 suggest that this chromosome alteration may not be essential to the development of myeloid disorders.

Bone Marrow↗

Cytogenetic and interphase cytogenetic analyses reveal chromosome instability but no clonal trisomy 8 in Dupuytren contracture.

The results of cytogenetic and FISH analysis performed in 26 cases of Dupuytren contracture are reported. Clonal or sporadic chromosome changes were found in 18 cases (69%). Clonal changes consisted of: +2, +16, -10, -Y, add(1)(p23), del(2)(q21), t(3;16)(p21;q24), add (3)(p24), del(18)(q21), t(Y;14)(p12;q24), +mar. The results differ from those obtained in normal palmar fascia used as control, in which -Y and +Y were the only clonal changes found in 2 of 11 analyzed cases (18%). No clonal trisomy 8 was found. FISH analysis performed in 11 cases (centromeric probe specific for chromosome 8) failed to show the presence of a cell population with +8. Clonal and sporadic structural changes were different from case to case and no clustering breakpoint was observed. The significance of the chromosome instability leading to clonal and sporadic chromosome changes not specific to Dupuytren contracture are discussed.

Aged↗

Interphase cytogenetics of esophageal adenocarcinoma and precursor lesions.

Limited information is currently available on chromosomal abnormalities in esophageal adenocarcinoma and associated premalignant lesions. In this study, numeric changes affecting chromosomes 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 17, 18, X, and Y were analyzed by using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with chromosome-specific centromere DNA probes in 12 esophageal adenocarcinomas. In addition, TP53 overexpression, measured by immunohistochemistry, and amplification of HER-2/neu and C-MYC, detected by FISH, were analyzed within the same tumors. The most common numeric abnormalities detected were gains of chromosomes 12 (8 cases), 6 (7 cases), 7 (7 cases), and 11 (6 cases). The total number of abnormal chromosomes varied from 0 to 10, with an average of 4.6 per case. Overexpression of TP53 was present in 9 of 12 cases. No correlation was noted between the degree of aneusomy and TP53 overexpression. In contrast, HER-2/neu amplification was present in two cases, both with large numbers of aneusomic chromosomes. Amplification of C-MYC was detected in only one case that had a moderate number of numeric abnormalities. In a subset of cases in which premalignant lesions were examined, aneusomy was found to be an early change, frequently present in both Barrett's esophagus and dysplastic regions. In contrast, gene amplification and TP53 overexpression were restricted to more advanced areas of dysplasia and malignancy. Screening larger cohorts of patients with Barrett's esophagus or dysplasia for numeric abnormalities of chromosomes 6, 7, 11, and 12 may determine whether any of these abnormalities are predictive markers of progression to malignancy.

Adenocarcinoma↗