Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Resectable”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,333 records · Page 74Linked to original sources

Anastomotic complications after tracheal resection: prognostic factors and management.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to identify risk factors for anastomotic complications after tracheal resection and to describe the management of these patients. METHODS: This was a single-institution, retrospective review of 901 patients who underwent tracheal resection. RESULTS: The indications for tracheal resection were postintubation tracheal stenosis in 589 patients, tumor in 208, idiopathic laryngotracheal stenosis in 83, and tracheoesophageal fistula in 21. Anastomotic complications occurred in 81 patients (9%). Eleven patients (1%) died after operation, 6 of anastomotic complications and 5 of other causes (odds ratio 13.0, P = .0001 for risk of death after anastomotic complication). At the end of treatment, 853 patients (95%) had a good result, whereas 37 patients (4%) had an airway maintained by tracheostomy or T-tube. The treatments of patients with an anastomotic complication were as follows: multiple dilations (n = 2), temporary tracheostomy (n = 7), temporary T-tube (n = 16), permanent tracheostomy (n = 14), permanent T-tube (n = 20), and reoperation (n = 16). Stepwise multivariable analysis revealed the following predictors of anastomotic complications: reoperation (odds ratio 3.03, 95% confidence interval 1.69-5.43, P = .002), diabetes (odds ratio 3.32, 95% confidence interval 1.76-6.26, P = .002), lengthy (> or =4 cm) resections (odds ratio 2.01, 95% confidence interval 1.21-3.35, P = .007), laryngotracheal resection (odds ratio 1.80, 95% confidence interval 1.07-3.01, P = .03), age 17 years or younger (odds ratio 2.26, 95% confidence interval 1.09-4.68, P = .03), and need for tracheostomy before operation (odds ratio 1.79, 95% confidence interval 1.03-3.14, P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: Tracheal resection is usually successful and has a low mortality. Anastomotic complications are uncommon, and important risk factors are reoperation, diabetes, lengthy resections, laryngotracheal resections, young age (pediatric patients), and the need for tracheostomy before operation.

Adolescent↗

Laryngotracheoplastic resection for primary tumors of the proximal airway.

BACKGROUND: Primary tumors of the airway with proximity to vocal cords and recurrent laryngeal nerves can be resected with sparing of the larynx. Long-term data on survival and local recurrence after laryngotracheal resection are scarce. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of laryngotracheal resection and reconstruction for primary tumors of the airway since 1972. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients aged 15 to 77 years presented with adenoid cystic carcinomas (n = 9), squamous cell carcinomas (n = 6), and other airway tumors (n = 10). Subglottic resection consisted of anterior cricoid in 5 patients; posterior cricoid mucosa in 9 patients, with resection of the posterior cricoid plate in 3 patients; lateral resection in 7 patients; and combined anterior and posterior elements in 4 patients. Vascularized trachea was tailored to reconstruct the defect. Seven patients without hoarseness required resection of the recurrent laryngeal nerve, and 4 other patients with hoarseness did not. There were no operative deaths. Two (8.0%) patients who had received prior high-dose cervical radiation had anastomotic separation, one requiring laryngectomy. One patient needed permanent tracheostomy, and temporary (<2 months) airway tubes were used in 5 patients. Sixteen patients received postoperative radiation. Median follow-up was 101 months. Four (16%) patients died of disease. Overall survival at 5 and 10 years was 79% and 64%, respectively. No patient underwent laryngectomy for recurrence. CONCLUSION: Laryngotracheal resection and immediate reconstruction for subglottic tumors is achieved with good preservation of voice, low morbidity, and no compromise of long-term survival.

Adolescent↗

Resection extent versus postoperative outcomes of seizure and memory in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effects of the resection of hippocampus and temporal neocortex on postsurgical seizure and memory outcomes in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (mTLE) patients. METHODS: Sixty-eight mTLE patients underwent pre- and postsurgical brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The patients were divided into seizure-free group (SF, N=54) and non-seizure-free group (NSF, N=14). The resection length of hippocampus was determined by the difference between presurgical and postsurgical hippocampus lengths in MRIs. The lengths of resected temporal gyri were measured on three-dimensional MRI reconstruction. Among SF group, 37 patients performed pre- and postsurgical neuropsychological tests. The postsurgical memory decline (PMD) was calculated by subtracting postsurgical memory score from presurgical one in verbal and visual memory tests. RESULTS: The resection length of hippocampus in SF was significantly longer than in NSF (32.7 +/- 7.7 mm versus 25.1 +/- 7.3 mm, t-test, p=0.002), regardless of intersubject difference in the extent of hippocampal sclerosis (logistic regression, p=0.003) while the resection lengths of the lateral temporal gyri were not different between SF and NSF. Overall postsurgical change of verbal or visual memory was not significant. However, regression analysis showed a significant correlation between the resection length of inferior or basal temporal gyrus and verbal PMD (p<0.001) in left TLE patients with seizure-free outcome. CONCLUSION: More resection of hippocampus may predict a better postsurgical seizure-free outcome. The larger resection of inferior or basal temporal gyrus seems to be related to a postsurgical verbal memory decline in left TLE patients.

Adolescent↗

Operative resection of primary carcinoid neoplasms in patients with liver metastases yields significantly better survival.

BACKGROUND: It is unclear whether there is a benefit to resection of primary gastrointestinal carcinoid neoplasm with hepatic metastases. We investigated whether primary tumor resection in this setting led to a significant difference in outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients with abdominal carcinoid neoplasms between 1995 and 2006 was performed. Data collected on patients with proven carcinoid liver metastases at initial diagnosis included whether the primary neoplasm was resected, time to progression of liver metastases, and status at last follow-up. Progression-free survival and survival were calculated by the method of Kaplan-Meier and compared by the log-rank test. RESULTS: There were 84 patients, 60 of whom had their primary neoplasm resected. The resected group had a greater median progression-free survival of 56 months, compared with 25 months for the primary nonresected group (P < .001). Median survival time for the resected group was longer at 159 months, compared with 47 months for the nonresected group (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Resection of the primary neoplasm is associated with better progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with abdominal carcinoid neoplasms. Therefore, localization and resection of the primary neoplasm should be considered, even among patients in whom the primary neoplasm is asymptomatic.

Abdominal Neoplasms↗

Correlation of factors predicting intraoperative brain shift with successful resection of malignant brain tumors using image-guided techniques.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative brain shift may cause inaccuracy of stereotactic image guidance on the basis of preoperatively acquired imaging data. The purpose of our study was to determine whether factors predicting brain shift affect the success of image-guided resection of malignant brain tumors. METHODS: We retrospectively studied 54 patients who underwent image-guided resections of histopathologically confirmed malignant brain tumors (9 metastases, 45 high-grade gliomas). Precautions were taken during surgery to minimize brain shift, but intraoperative imaging was not performed. The following factors predictive of intraoperative brain shift were assessed: tumor size, periventricular location, patient age, prior surgery or radiation therapy, patient positioning, use of mannitol, and length of operative time. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging was obtained in all cases within 48 hours of surgery to assess extent of resection. RESULTS: Perioperative mortality was 0% in our series; perioperative morbidity was 3 of 54 patients (5.5%); 1 patient required reoperation for a hematoma, and 2 had transient neurological deficits. Successful resection was accomplished in 93% of tumors less than 30 cm(3) compared with 63.6% of tumors greater than 30 cm(3) (P = .026, Fisher exact test). This difference was more pronounced for patients with malignant gliomas. However, other factors predictive of intraoperative brain shift were not associated with unsuccessful resection. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative brain shift does not significantly affect the likelihood of successful resection of malignant brain tumors smaller than 30 cm(3). Larger tumors are less likely to be successfully resected, although factors other than brain shift can contribute to unsuccessful resection.

Adult↗

Hepatic resection after liver transplantation as a graft-saving procedure: indication criteria, timing and outcome.

BACKGROUND: Hepatic resection is uncommon after liver transplantation (LT), but can be a graft-saving procedure in selected cases. Herein we describe the criteria, outcome, and timing of this procedure in our series. METHODS: Between January 1996 and December 2002, 397 LTs were performed in 367 recipients, of whom 12 patients (3.2%) subsequently underwent liver graft resections because of ischemic-type biliary lesions (ITBLs) (n = 5, 41.6%), segmental hepatic artery thrombosis (S-HAT)(n = 3, 25%), recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (n = 2, 16.6%), liver abscess (n = 1, 8.3%), or liver trauma (n = 1, 8.3%). The patients were divided into group 1 (n = 3 all with S-HAT) who underwent early resections (within 3 months of LT), and group 2 (n = 9) who underwent late resections (after 3 months). The outcomes and postoperative mortality ratio (within 30 days) were compared. RESULTS: The resections consisted of four left lobectomies, three right hepatectomies, two extended right hepatectomies, one segmentectomy, one anterior trisegmentectomy, and one right lateral sectoriectomy. The perioperative mortality rate was 66.6% in group 1 (one case of myocardial infarction and one of sepsis), and 22% in group 2 (one case of sepsis and one of hepatic failure). CONCLUSIONS: Late resections in stable patients with damage confined to the graft yield good prognosis. Even major resections are feasible graft-saving procedures. In contrast, early hepatic resections in S-HAT are associated with a worse outcome. Retransplantation should be considered the first-choice option. Sepsis significantly affects the postsurgical course.

Carcinoma, Hepatocellular↗

Morbidity of rectosigmoid resection and primary anastomosis in patients undergoing primary cytoreductive surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Studies from the colorectal literature have shown that factors associated with anastomotic leak after colorectal resection include long surgical time (>2 h), multiple blood transfusions, and short distance to the anal verge. The aim of this study was to assess the morbidity associated with en bloc resection of ovarian carcinoma with low anterior resection and anastomosis in patients undergoing primary cytoreductive surgery for advanced disease. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of all patients who had undergone primary cytoreduction for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer with rectosigmoid resection followed by low rectal anastomosis between January 1994 and June 2004. Patient characteristics, operative details, and postoperative complications were extracted from patients' charts. RESULTS: Seventy patients met the above criteria and form our study group. The median age was 59 years (range, 25-82). There were 52 stage IIIC (74%) and 18 stage IV (26%) cancers. The median operating time was 315 min (range, 120-750) and the median estimated blood loss was 1200 ml (range, 250-8000), with 53 (76%) patients requiring blood transfusion. Twenty-eight patients (40%) underwent major upper abdominal procedures other than omentectomy, and 14 patients (20%) underwent a second bowel resection. Twelve patients (17%) underwent a protective ileostomy while the remainder (83%) did not. Of the 58 patients with no ostomy, the only complications associated with the resection and anastomoses were a pelvic abscess in 3 patients (5%) and an anastomotic leak requiring diverting colostomy in 1 patient (1.7%). Of the 12 patients who had protective ileostomies, 3 (25%) had complications related to their ileostomy short-bowel syndrome requiring early reversal, incarceration of the prolapsed loop requiring surgical correction, and prolapse corrected electively at the time of second-look surgery. CONCLUSIONS: In women undergoing primary cytoreductive surgery, the morbidity associated with en bloc resection of ovarian carcinoma with low rectosigmoid resection and anastomosis without protective ileostomy was acceptably low, with an anastomotic leak rate of less than 2%. Protective ileostomy is not always necessary and should be used selectively.

Adult↗

Radical pelvic resection and intraoperative radiation therapy for recurrent endometrial cancer: technique and analysis of outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the technique and assess outcomes and morbidity following radical resection combined with intraoperative electron radiation therapy (IOERT) in patients with recurrent endometrial cancer. METHODS: From 1986 to 2002, 25 patients received treatment including radical resection and IOERT for recurrent endometrioid, endometrial cancer. Relevant clinical information was extracted through retrospective chart review. RESULTS: Treatment prior to referral included radiation in 56% and either a secondary surgery or chemotherapy in 48%. External radiation (EBRT) was administered in addition to IOERT in 84%. Radical procedures performed at the time of IOERT included resection of the pelvic sidewall en bloc with the obturator nerve, external iliac vein, psoas, iliacus, or obturator internus muscles, ureter, or boney ileum. Seven patients required exenteration in combination with resection of the pelvic sidewall. The median IOERT dose was 1500 cGy (range 1000-2500 cGy). Overall five-year survival was 47% vs. 71% for those with a gross total resection but close margins. Two patients with recurrences limited to the para-aortic area are alive without evidence of disease at 54 and 71 months. Proportional hazards modeling showed concurrent EBRT, tumor size after resection, grade, and age to be associated with improved survival. The most common complications were peripheral neuropathy, functional ureteral obstruction, and fistula formation. CONCLUSIONS: With an aggressive treatment approach including radical resection combined with IOERT, long-term survival is possible in a significant number of patients with localized recurrent endometrial cancer. Preoperative radiation paired with complete surgical resection utilizing extended procedures is paramount to achieving optimal outcomes.

Adult↗

Benefits and limits of hepatic resection for gastric metastases.

BACKGROUND: The significance of hepatic resection for gastric metastases has been controversial. METHODS: Forty consecutive patients undergoing hepatic resection for gastric metastases were reviewed to examine the benefits and the limits of hepatic resection using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: The overall survival was 27% at 2 years, 18% at 5 years, and 11% at 10 years. Six patients survived more than 5 years. All of the 6 patients underwent anatomical hepatic resection more extensive than segmentectomy, with sufficient resection margin. There were recurrences in 31 patients, and 94% of the recurrences were in the remaining liver. Univariate analysis showed time of hepatic metastases (P = 0.0078) and resection margin (P = 0.024) as significant prognostic factors. Multivariate analysis indicated that only time of hepatic metastases was an independent prognostic factor that influenced survival. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that in patients with synchronous metastases we should consider patient selection more strictly, and that in patients with metachronous metastases we should perform anatomical hepatic resection with sufficient resection margin.

Adult↗

Cryoablation and liver resection for noncolorectal liver metastases.

BACKGROUND: Liver resection for noncolorectal liver metastases has merit for selected primary tumor types. The role of cryosurgical tumor ablation within this cohort of patients has not been evaluated. This is a single institutional review of treatment outcomes using cryosurgical ablation and conventional resection techniques for noncolorectal liver metastases. METHODS: The medical records of 42 patients undergoing 48 hepatic tumor ablative procedures from February 1991 through May 2001 at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. Overall survival and local hepatic tumor recurrence-free survival were analyzed for different surgical procedures and primary tumor types. RESULTS: Overall survival rates at 1, 3, and 5 years are 82%, 55%, and 39%, respectively (median survival, 45 months). Local hepatic tumor recurrence-free survival rates for resection only (n = 25) and cryosurgery with or without resection (n = 23), at 3 years are 24% and 19%, respectively. The survival rates at 5 years are 40% and 37%, for resection only and cryosurgery with or without resection, respectively. CONCLUSION: Cryosurgical hepatic tumor ablation for metastatic noncolorectal primary tumors results in survival and local hepatic tumor recurrence rates similar to resection alone. The combination of cryosurgery and resection extends the cohort of patients with surgically treatable disease.

Adolescent↗

Lateral temporal bone resections.

Eighteen consecutive patients underwent a lateral temporal bone resection for the treatment of tumors originating in the auricle, the external auditory canal, the periauricular skin, or the parotid and were retrospectively analyzed. The different lateral temporal bone resections performed have been categorized into four types. The type I resection consists of the removal of the tympanic bone and the external auditory canal lateral to the tympanic membrane. The type II resection consists of the removal of the entire tympanic bone, the tympanic membrane, the incus, and the malleus, preserving the facial nerve and the inner ear. Type III resections remove, in addition to the those structures removed in type II resections, the distal facial nerve and fallopian canal, the mastoid tip, the styloid process, and the stylomastoid foramen. The type IV resection consists of the removal of only the mastoid tip and the inferior portion of the tympanic bone. When the techniques of lateral temporal bone resection are used appropriately, adequate surgical treatment of patients with selected advanced and recurrent malignant tumors of the external ear, the periauricular skin, and the parotid is possible with low morbidity and a high probability of local regional control.

Adult↗

Segments I and IV resection as a new approach for hepatic hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Major hepatic resection for biliary tract carcinoma with obstructive jaundice has been reported on as bringing about high surgical morbidity and mortality rates. It has been also revealed that the extent of hepatic resection is closely associated with the occurrence of postoperative complications. Therefore, hepatic resection, limited as much as possible to what is necessary for curative resection, should be performed according to cancer extent. We performed a new surgical approach in 3 patients with hepatic hilar cholangiocarcinoma that included total resection of hepatic segments I and IV (by Couinaud's classification) and bile duct resection with hepaticojejunostomy of 4 to 6 intrahepatic bile duct stumps. All patients underwent curative surgical resections and were discharged within 6 weeks after surgery, without any serious complications. This limited resection of hepatic segments I and IV could be an effective radical surgical procedure for hepatic hilar cholangiocarcinoma, to avoid the occurrence of postoperative liver failure.

Cholangiocarcinoma↗

The significance of histologically infiltrated resection margin after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Microscopic tumor infiltration of the resection margin after esophageal resection is implicated to influence anastomotic leakage, tumor recurrence rates, and long-term survival. METHODS: Patients with tumor infiltration of resection margin (RM+) and those without (RM-) were compared. RESULTS: Of 604 patients, 45 (7.5%) were RM+. Patients in the RM+ group had more palliative resections, 76% versus 56%, P = 0.01. Anastomotic leakage rates were 2.2% (RM+) and 4.1% (RM-), P = 1.0. Excluding hospital deaths, anastomotic recurrences developed in 10.3% in the RM+ group and 4.9% in the RM- groups, P = 0.15. Although a positive margin did not increase anastomotic recurrence, a shorter resection margin correlated with such recurrence. The mean (SEM) lengths of resection margins in surgical specimens were 2.7 cm (0.3) and 4.4 cm (0.1) for those with and without recurrence, P < 0.001. Median survival time were 8.8 months (RM+) and 15 months (RM-), P = 0.007. CONCLUSIONS: Histologic infiltration of resection margins did not influence leakage rate. Anastomotic recurrence was related to the length of resection margin.

Adult↗

Utility of 18F-FDG positron emission tomography scanning on selection of patients for resection of hepatic colorectal metastases.

BACKGROUND: Hepatectomy represents a standard and potentially curative therapy for hepatic colorectal metastases. However, up to two thirds of patients explored for resection are found to have unsuspected disease, which precludes resection. METHODS: In order to determine if 18F-FDG positron emission tomography (PET) scanning may prevent unnecessary surgery, a group of 40 patients being considered for hepatic resection but at high risk for unresectable disease by clinical criteria were subjected to whole body 18F-FDG-PET scanning. Effect on clinical outcome was evaluated. In addition, PET findings in the 25 patients who underwent resection of hepatic metastases were directly compared with the resected specimen to determine the sensitivity of 18F-FDG PET scanning in the liver. RESULTS: Findings on 18F-FDG-PET scanning influenced the clinical management in 16 patients (40%) and directly altered management in 9 cases (23%). Six patients were spared laparotomy, and 3 others had PET-directed surgery that found extrahepatic tumor and spared the patient unwarranted liver resection. In 3 cases PET missed peritoneal metastases found on laparotomy. In these cases all missed tumors were less than 1 cm in size. Out of 52 resected hepatic lesions, 18F-FDG-PET detected 37. Within the liver, sensitivity of detection was also related to size. Only 25% of hepatic lesions smaller than 1 cm were detected by PET, while 85% of lesions larger than 1 cm were detected. CONCLUSIONS: FDG-PET is best for detecting extrahepatic disease. There are few false positives, and surgeons should carefully evaluate and biopsy extrahepatic positive sites. This test should be used for patients at high risk for extrahepatic disease and should be evaluated prospectively for all patients under consideration for liver resection.

Adult↗

Drainage is unnecessary after elective liver resection.

PURPOSE: A prospective, randomized trial was performed to determine if intra-abdominal drainage catheters are necessary after elective liver resection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between April 1992 and April 1994, 120 patients subjected to liver resection, stratified by extent of resection and by surgeon, were randomized to receive or not receive operative closed-suction drainage. Operative blood loss was not an exclusion criteria, and no patient who consented to the study was excluded. RESULTS: Eighty-seven patients (73%) had resection of one hepatic lobe or more (27 lobectomies, 54 trisegmentectomies, and 6 bilobar atypical resections) and 33 had less than a lobectomy (8 wedge resections or enucleations, 9 segmentectomies, and 16 bisegmentectomies). Eighty-four patients (70%) had metastatic cancer and 36 patients (30%) had primary liver pathology. There were no differences in outcome, including length of hospital stay (no drain, 13.4 +/- 0.9 days; drain, 13.1 +/- 0.8 days; P = not significant [NS]), mortality (no drain, 3.3%; drain, 3.3%), complication rate (no drain, 43%; drain, 48%; P = NS), or requirement for subsequent percutaneous drainage (no drain, 18%; drain, 8%; P = NS). All infected collections (n = 3) occurred in operatively drained patients. Two other complications were directly related to the operatively placed drains. One patient developed a subcutaneous abscess at the drain site, and a second developed a subcutaneous drain tract tumor recurrence as the only current site of recurrence. CONCLUSION: In the first 50 consecutive resections performed since the conclusion of this trial, only 4 patients (8%) have required subsequent percutaneous drainage. We conclude that abdominal drainage is unnecessary after elective liver resection.

Abdomen↗

Hepatic resection for metastatic neuroendocrine carcinomas.

BACKGROUND: Metastatic neuroendocrine malignancies frequently cause incapacitating endocrinopathies, and metastases predominant in the liver. Hepatic resection of metastases from such tumors is attractive because the natural history of neuroendocrine tumors is protracted, clinical severity of the endocrinopathy correlates with tumor volume, and local and intrahepatic growth characteristics often allow complete resection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: To define the role of hepatic resection for metastatic neuroendocrine tumors, the records of 74 patients who underwent hepatic resection for such tumors between 1984 and 1992 were reviewed. Neuroendocrine tumors were classified by site of origin and clinical endocrinopathy. Survival, and type and duration of symptomatic response, were assessed as the major outcomes of this study. RESULTS: There were 50 carcinoid, 23 islet-cell, and 1 atypical neuroendocrine tumors. Resections included 36 hemihepatectomies or extended hepatectomies and 38 nonanatomic resections. Thirty-eight primary tumors were resected concomitantly. Perioperative mortality was 2.7% and morbidity was 24%. Four-year survival was 73%. Overall postoperative symptomatic response rate was 90% with a mean duration of response of 19.3 months. CONCLUSIONS: Hepatic resection for metastatic neuroendocrine malignancies is safe, provides effective palliation, and probably prolongs survival.

Adult↗

Survival after resection of metachronous non-small cell lung cancer in 127 patients.

BACKGROUND: In a number of patients with treated primary non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) a second primary tumor will be diagnosed. Our experience with surgery in these patients was analyzed and possible prognostic parameters were defined. METHODS: Patients with metachronous NSCLC (n = 127) who underwent resection from 1970 through 1997 were analyzed. All tumors were classified postsurgically. Median interval between the tumors was 3.7 years. Actuarial survival time was estimated and risk factors influencing survival were evaluated. RESULTS: Overall 5-year survival after the first resection was 70% and after the second resection was 26%. Patients with stage IA of the second primary tumor did have a significantly better survival (p < 0.005) as compared with patients with higher staged second primaries. Stage of second primary tumor and age were significant predictors of survival, whereas stage of first tumor, interval between resections, histology, and type of resection were not. CONCLUSIONS: Survival of patients with metachronous NSCLC and resection of both tumors is high, but poorer than after resection of the first tumor. Irrespective of the interval, patients with stage IA second primary tumor may benefit more from pulmonary resection.

Aged↗

Long-term results after pulmonary resection of renal cell carcinoma metastases.

BACKGROUND: Until now no conclusive data exist regarding the factors influencing long-term survival after pulmonary resection of renal cell carcinoma metastases. The aim of the present study, therefore, was to discover definitive prognostic factors for survival using a large and homogeneous single center patient cohort. METHODS: Between 1980 and 2000, 105 patients, after curative resection of lung metastases from renal cell carcinoma, were followed in this long-term study. These patients underwent a total of 150 surgical procedures. Survival analysis was done using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test. Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors was performed using the Cox multivariate proportional hazard model. RESULTS: Median survival after curative resection reached 43 months (range, 1 to 218 months). Survival at 3, 5, and 10 years was 54%, 40%, and 33%, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed that a complete resection, a less than 4-cm diameter of the metastases and tumor-free lymph nodes at the time of primary operation, were highly significant dependent prognostic factors (p < 0.001). These factors were also shown to be independent prognostic factors as suggested by multivariate analysis (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The size of the metastatic nodule, the completeness of pulmonary resection, and the lymph node status at the time of nephrectomy are the most important prognostic factors that influence survival after resection of pulmonary metastases. Recurrence of resectable pulmonary metastases does not impair survival, thus favoring repeated resection in patients with recurrent disease.

Adult↗