Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “RESINS”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,333 records · Page 74Linked to original sources

Polymerisation characteristics of resin composites polymerised with different curing units.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the plasma arc light source Apollo 95E and the conventional halogen lamp Elipar Visio regarding a number of polymerisation characteristics of different resin composites. METHODS: Four different resin composites (Arabesk Top, Herculite XRV, Pertac II, Tetric) were irradiated using the Apollo 95E unit for one, two or three cycles of 3 s and using the Elipar Visio unit for 40 s. The investigated polymerisation characteristics were: flexural strength and modulus of elasticity, bond strength to dentine, depth of polymerisation, and quantity of remaining double bonds. The data were treated statistically by analysis of variance and by Scheffé test. RESULTS: The modulus of elasticity and the flexural strength resulting from curing with Apollo 95E for 1 x 3 s were equal to or less than those resulting from curing with Elipar Visio. The bond strength to dentine and the depth of polymerisation with Apollo 95E used for 1 x 3 s were equal to or less than that obtained with the conventional lamp, depending on the resin composite. Irradiation of Herculite XRV resulted in a higher quantity of remaining double bonds than did Elipar Visio. In general, two or three curing cycles of 3 s with Apollo 95E were necessary to produce mechanical properties not significantly worse than with 40 s of conventional curing. CONCLUSIONS: The efficiency of plasma arc curing with Apollo 95E strongly depends on the resin composite. For most resin composites tested, plasma arc curing for 3 s resulted in inferior mechanical properties as compared to conventional curing.

Composite Resins↗

Evaluation of the marginal fit of three margin designs of resin composite crowns using CAD/CAM.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the marginal fit of resin composite crowns manufactured with the CEREC 3 system employing three different margin designs; bevel, chamfer and shoulder, by means of a replica technique and a luting agent. METHODS: Three master casts were fabricated from an impression of a typodont molar tooth and a full-coverage crown prepared with a marginal finish of a bevel, a chamfer and a shoulder. Each cast was replicated 10 times (n=10). Scanning of the replicas and crown designing was performed using the CEREC Scan system. The crowns were milled from Paradigm MZ100 composite resin blocks. The marginal fit of the crowns was evaluated with a replica technique (Aquasil LV, Dentsply), and with a resin composite cement (RelyX Unicem, Aplicap) and measured with a travelling microscope. Statistical analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA. RESULTS: For the replica technique the average marginal gaps recorded were: Bevel Group 105+/-34 microm, Chamfer Group 94+/-27 microm and Shoulder Group 91+/-22 microm. For the resin composite cement the average marginal gaps were: Bevel Group 102+/-28 microm, Chamfer Group 91+/-11 microm and Shoulder Group 77+/-8 microm. Two-way ANOVA analysis showed that there was no statistically significant difference between the three groups of finishing lines regardless of the cementation technique used. CONCLUSIONS: The marginal gap of resin composite crowns manufactured with the CEREC 3 system is within the range of clinical acceptance, regardless of the finishing line prepared or the cementation technique used.

Acrylic Resins↗

Is an oxygen inhibited layer required for bonding of resin-coated gutta-percha to a methacrylate-based root canal sealer?

Removal of the oxygen inhibition layer from the surface of resin-coated gutta-percha cones during packaging has been hypothesized for their weak adhesion to a methacrylate-based root canal sealer, resulting in their frequent delamination from the sealer after root canal obturation. This study examined the feasibility of creating oxygen inhibition layers on resin-coated gutta-percha cones via the adjunctive application of a dual-cured dentin adhesive just before bonding. Composite cylinders were bonded with EndoREZ to flat, resin-coated gutta-percha disks and similar disks that were post-treated with Prime&Bond NT Dual Cure adhesive and stressed to failure using a modified microshear testing design. Although shear strengths for both groups were relatively low, a 5-fold increase in shear strength was observed after adhesive application, with complex interfacial failures instead of complete sealer delamination from the resin-coating. In-situ dentin adhesive application appears to have merits in enhancing the coupling of resin-coated gutta-percha to methacrylate sealers.

Analysis of Variance↗

Diametral tensile strength of a resin composite core with nonmetallic prefabricated posts: an in vitro study.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: A number of prefabricated nonmetallic posts are currently available for use in conjunction with resin composite cores before fabrication of crowns for endodontically treated teeth. Information is needed regarding the strength of the composite and the nature of attachment between its components. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the influence of different types of posts on the fracture resistance of a resin composite core material using the diametral tensile strength (DTS) test. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Cylindrical specimens, 6 mm in diameter and 3 mm high, were prepared from resin composite (Tetric Ceram) and a group of prefabricated posts (n=10) as follows: resin composite only (control); Vectrispost (VTS); FiberKor (FKR); AEstheti-Plus post (ATP); Light-Post (LTP); Dentorama post (DRM), and Para-Post (PRP) as a second control. Specimens were stored for 7 days in water at 37 degrees C and then subjected to DTS test in a universal testing machine until failure occurred and load was recorded (N). Mean values and SD for DTS values (MPA) were calculated, and data were analyzed statistically with 1-way analysis of variance, followed by the Tukey test (alpha=.05). Representative specimens from each group were examined with SEM to determine nature of failure. RESULTS: Mean values (SD) in MPa for DTS were as follow: CONTROL GROUP: 49.64 (3.36); VTS: 29.77 (3.36); FKR: 31.9 (2.39); ATP: 28.92 (2.2); LTP: 34.26 (3.37); DRM: 33.45 (2.46), and PRP: 27.90 (2.40). Analysis of variance indicated significant differences among the groups (P<.05). SEM examination indicated that for PRP failure was adhesive in nature, whereas with all nonmetallic posts, cohesive failure was more predominant. CONCLUSION: The use of posts did not result in reinforcement of resin composite core when diametral tensile force was applied. When used with the core material, LTP, DRM, and FKR resulted in the highest DTS values, whereas PRP resulted in the lowest values.

Analysis of Variance↗

Effect of an adhesive resin luting agent on the dowel-head retention of three different core materials.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: A dowel-and-core restoration may fail due to failure at either the dowel-tooth or dowel head-core material interface. Long-term clinical success of a dowel-and-core restoration depends on retention of both the dowel to the tooth and the dowel head to the core material. Thus, strengthening of the dowel head-core interface is important. PURPOSE: This study evaluated the retention between a prefabricated dowel and 3 different core materials with or without a dual-polymerized adhesive resin luting agent. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty prefabricated dowels (Gold Plated Anchorage Post) were divided into 3 groups (n=20) consisting of 1 of 3 core materials, amalgam (Standalloy F), light-polymerized resin composite (Clearfil Ray), or glass ionomer (Chelon-Silver). Each core group was divided into 2 subgroups (n=10), and a dual-polymerized adhesive resin luting agent (Panavia F) was applied to the dowel heads of 1 of these subgroups before application of the core material. The manufacturing procedure was standardized by using a plastic index (4.5-mm internal diameter and 5-mm height) and a custom-made dowel holder, which held the dowel head. Prepared specimens were stored in water at room temperature for 3 months and then loaded to fracture in a universal testing machine with a crosshead speed of 0.05 mm/min until failure. Bond strengths were recorded (MPa). Data were analyzed with 2-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) in a 2 x 3 factorial randomized design (alpha=.05). Afterward, core material differences were computed with 1-way ANOVA for both of the bonded and nonbonded groups. Post hoc multiple comparisons were made with the Dunnett C multiple range test. RESULTS: Dowel-head retention values (MPa) of the tested core materials (mean +/- SD) from the highest to the lowest were as follows: bonded amalgam core, 296.1 +/- 108; bonded composite core, 284.3 +/- 38.3; nonbonded composite core, 177.0 +/- 53.7; nonbonded amalgam core, 128.5 +/- 35.0; bonded glass-ionomer core (GIC), 128.0 +/- 24.5; nonbonded GIC, 61.8 +/- 13.3. Two-way ANOVA revealed significant differences between the core material groups and between the bonded and nonbonded groups (P <.001). The interaction between the core material and bond variables was also significant (P =.018). One-way ANOVA revealed statistically significant differences between the bonded (P <.001) and also between the nonbonded core material groups (P <.001). Post hoc multiple comparisons showed that the dowel-head retention of the GIC was significantly weaker than the post-head retention for amalgam and resin composite, whether bonded or not. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, the adhesive resin luting agent tested appeared to have a significant strengthening effect on the dowel-head retention of the core materials.

Adhesives↗

Increases in intrapulpal temperature during polymerization of composite resin.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The polymerization of dental composite resins can generate increases in intrapulpal temperature that may damage the pulp. The development of new polymerization devices such as the argon laser makes the assessment of these temperatures important. PURPOSE: This study compared increases in temperature generated by argon laser and halogen light when polymerizing a bonding system and a composite resin, and also sought to determine whether both types of polymerization lights generate temperature increases below the safe limit of 5.5 degrees C. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thermocouples linked to a temperature reading system were positioned in the pulp chamber of 10 extracted bovine incisors. Class V cavities were prepared, etched, and filled with a 1-bottle bonding system (Single Bond) and composite resin (Z-100). The test groups were as follows (n = 5 for all groups): halogen light for bonding system (HB); halogen light for composite resin (HC); argon laser for bonding system (LB), and argon laser for composite resin (LC). The polymerization parameters were halogen light operated at 600 mW/cm2 for 40 seconds, which served as control, and argon laser operated at 200 mW for 10 seconds. Data were analyzed by a 2-way (light versus material) analysis of variance (ANOVA) (alpha = .05). RESULTS: The average temperature increases were 2.35 degrees C (HB), 2.69 degrees C (HC), 1.25 degrees C (LB), and 1.5 degrees C (LC). Significant differences between halogen light and argon laser (P = .002), but not between composite and bonding system, were demonstrated. CONCLUSIONS: The argon laser produced significantly lower increases in pulpal temperature than the halogen light, independent of the thickness of the polymerized material.

Analysis of Variance↗

Performance of selected anion exchange resins for the treatment of a high DOC content surface water.

The objective of this study was first to compare the performance of four strong anion exchange resins (AERs) (MIEX from Orica Pty Ltd, DOWEX-11 and DOWEX-MSA from DOW chemical and IRA-938 from Rohm and Haas) for their application in drinking water treatment (natural organic matter (NOM), mineral anions (nitrate, sulfate and bromide) and pesticide removal) using bench-scale experimental procedures on a high DOC content surface water. The efficiency of MIEX for NOM and mineral anions removal was furthermore evaluated using bench-scale dose-response experiments on raw, clarified and post-ozonated waters. NOM removal was assessed using the measurement of dissolved organic carbon (DOC), UV absorbance at 254 nm (UV254) and the use of high-performance size exclusion chromatography with UV (HPSEC/UV) and fluorescence detection (HPSEC/FLUO). The MIEX and IRA938 anionic resins exhibit a faster removal of NOM and mineral anions compared to the DOWEX11 and MSA AERs. All the resins were found to be very effective with similar performances after 30 to 45 min of contact time. As expected, only limited sorption of atrazine and isoproturon (C0=1 microg/L) occurred with MIEX, DOWEX11 and MSA AERs. MIEX resin proved to be very efficient in eliminating NOM of high-molecular weight but also a large part of the smallest UV absorbing organic compounds which were refractory to coagulation/flocculation treatment. Remaining DOC levels after 30 min of contact with MIEX were found similar in raw water, clarified water and even post-ozonated water implying no DOC benefit can be gained by employing conventional treatment prior to MIEX treatment. Removal of bromide (initial concentration 110 microg/L) was also observed and ranged from 30% to 65% for resin dose increasing from 2 to 8 mL/L. T

Adsorption↗

Effect of ceramic surface treatments on the bond of four resin luting agents to a ceramic material.

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the effect of various ceramic surface treatments on the shear bond strengths of four resin luting agents to Cerec 2 ceramic material. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Four ceramic surface treatments were performed. All groups were subjected to the control treatment, which was abrasion with No. 600 silicon carbide paper. The other three group treatments were etching with phosphoric acid gel, application of bonding agent containing silane coupler, and application of silane coupling agent after etching with phosphoric acid gel. Cerec 2 ceramic specimens were treated with one of the four methods and then cemented together with each of the four resin luting agents (Super-Bond C&B, Panavia 21, Clapearl, and Vita Cerec Duo Cement). Half of the specimens were stored in water and the other half were thermal cycled before shear bond strength testing. RESULTS: Treatment with the silane coupler improved the shear bond strength compared only with the abrasion with carbide paper (control). When the ceramic material was treated with the silane coupler or the silane coupling agent after etching with phosphoric acid gel, no significant differences in bond strength were noted between water storage and 20,000 thermal cycles for any of the four resin luting agents. After 20,000 thermal cycles, all specimens treated with the silane coupling agent with phosphoric acid gel except those cemented with Super-Bond C&B resin luting agent after etching showed cohesive failures within the ceramic. CONCLUSION: Combined surface treatment of etching with phosphoric acid and application of silane coupling agent provides the highest bond strengths of resin luting agents to Cerec 2 ceramic material after thermal cycling.

Acid Etching, Dental↗

The influence of time of hydrogen peroxide exposure on the adhesion of composite resin to bleached bovine enamel.

Standard sized cylinders of a small particle light-cured resin were bonded to the flattened labial surface of young bovine incisor teeth which had been previously subjected to four different treatments: (a) immersion in 35% hydrogen peroxide and etched with 37% phosphoric acid gel for 60 s, (b) immersion in saline and etched for 60 s, (c) etched for 60 s and immersion in hydrogen peroxide, and (d) etched for 60 s and immersion in saline. Two hydrogen peroxide and saline immersion periods were used, 5 and 30 min. Specimens were stored in water at 37 degrees C for 1 and 7 days before tensile and shear testing. A total of 256 teeth were used, 8 for each treatment group, each immersion period, and each water storage period for each test. Statistical analysis of the results indicated that there was a highly significant reduction in the adhesive bond strength of the resin when the enamel was exposed to hydrogen peroxide and that the reduction was, within the limits of this study, time dependent. The bond strength was unaffected by the etching order and the period of water storage. Scanning electron microscopic examination of randomly selected fractured peroxide-treated specimens indicated that the failure occurred primarily at the bonding resin-enamel interface and that it was associated with areas of resin nonattachment and an alteration in resin quality. It is suspected that these changes were caused by the presence of residual peroxide or peroxide-related substances at or near the enamel surface.

Adhesiveness↗

Apical seal of roots obturated with laterally condensed gutta-percha, epoxy resin cement, and dentin bonding agent.

The apical seal of roots obturated with either of two kinds of dentin bonding agent, gutta-percha and epoxy-resin-based root canal sealer, was compared by a die leakage test with that of an epoxy resin root canal sealer and gutta-percha without a bonding agent. Thirty-two roots were prepared chemomechanically and divided into three experimental groups. Group 1 was filled with gutta-percha, epoxy-resin sealer, and All-Bond 2 Adhesive. Group 2 was filled with gutta-percha, epoxy-resin sealer, and Scotchbond Multi-Purpose Plus adhesive. Group 3 was filled with gutta-percha and epoxy resin sealer. The teeth were immersed in 2% methylene blue solution. Groups 1 and 2 leaked significantly less than group 3. The materials most frequently observed at the apex were in group 1 dental adhesive and in group 2 gutta-percha. The interface between dentin and the adhesive materials in groups 1 and 2 was examined by scanning electron microscope and showed a hybrid-like layer.

Dental Leakage↗

Characterization of resin composites polymerized with plasma arc curing units.

OBJECTIVES: Newly developed curing units (plasma arc curing units) operate at relatively high intensity and are claimed to result in optimum properties of resin composites in a short cure time. This study was conducted to determine a number of characteristics of resin composites polymerized by plasma arc curing units. METHODS: The investigated polymerization characteristics were quantity of remaining double bonds, depth of polymerization, flexural strength and modulus, and wall-to-wall polymerization contraction. The investigated plasma arc curing units were Apollo 95E and 1000 PAC. The conventional curing unit XL 3000 was used as baseline. RESULTS: Irradiation with Apollo 95E resulted in a higher quantity of remaining double bonds than did XL 3000, whereas the results obtained with 1000 PAC depended on the resin composite. The depth of cure with the plasma arc units was equal to or less than that obtained with the conventional unit, depending on the resin composite. The flexural strength did not depend on the curing unit. The flexural modulus resulting from curing with Apollo 95E was less than that resulting from curing with XL 3000 in 3 out of 4 comparisons. The wall-to-wall polymerization contraction was equal to or less with the plasma arc units than with the conventional unit. SIGNIFICANCE: Plasma arc curing units make it possible to polymerize resin composite in much shorter times than conventional curing units. However, the polymerization characteristics associated with the units may be less than optimal.

Composite Resins↗

Dental resin composites containing ceramic whiskers and precured glass ionomer particles.

OBJECTIVES: Glass ionomer, resin-modified glass ionomer, and compomer materials are susceptible to brittle fracture and are inadequate for use in large stress-bearing posterior restorations. The aim of this study was to use ceramic single crystal whiskers to reinforce composites formulated with precured glass ionomer, and to examine the effects of whisker-to-precured glass ionomer mass ratio on mechanical properties, fluoride release, and polishability of the composites. METHODS: Silica particles were fused onto silicon nitride whiskers to facilitate silanization and to improve whisker retention in the matrix. Hardened glass ionomer was ground into a fine powder, mixed with whiskers, and used as fillers for a dental resin. Four control materials were also tested: a glass ionomer, a resin-modified glass ionomer, a compomer, and a hybrid composite. A three-point flexural test was used to measure flexural strength, modulus, and work-of-fracture. A fluoride ion-selective electrode was used to measure fluoride release. Composite surfaces polished simulating clinical procedures were examined by SEM and profilometry. RESULTS: At whisker/(whisker + precured glass ionomer) mass fractions of 1.0 and 0.91, the whisker composite had a flexural strength in MPa (mean (SD); n = 6) of (196 (10)) and (150 (16)), respectively, compared to (15 (7)) for glass ionomer, (39 (8)) for resin-modified glass ionomer, (89 (18)) for compomer, and (120 (16)) for hybrid composite. The whisker composite had a cumulative fluoride release of nearly 20% of that of the glass ionomer after 90 days. The whisker composites had surface roughness comparable to the hybrid resin composite. SIGNIFICANCE: Composites filled with precured glass ionomer particles and whiskers exhibit moderate fluoride release with improved mechanical properties; the whisker-to-glass ionomer ratio is a key microstructural parameter that controls fluoride release and mechanical properties.

Acrylic Resins↗

Effect of one-year water storage on the surface microhardness of resin-modified versus conventional glass-ionomer cements.

OBJECTIVES: Conventional and resin-modified glass-ionomer cements (GIC, RM-GIC) are available for clinical use as restorative materials or as liners and bases. This study was conducted to compare the effect of a 12-month storage period in water on the surface microhardness, measured in Vickers units (VH), between a GIC and a RM-GIC group and to determine if the addition of resins improved the GIC microhardness. METHOD: VH microhardness was assessed in three GIC: Ketac-Fil, Ketac-Molar and Ketac-Silver (KF, KM, KS) and three RM-GIC: Photac-Fil, Fuji II LC and Vitremer (PF, FU, VI) stored in distilled water at 37 degrees C for 12 months. Measurements were taken at 1, 7, 15, 30, 90, 180 and 365 days. The statistical evaluation was done by means of one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's multiple comparison tests. RESULTS: There are significant VH differences among the materials studied and within each material over storage time. GICs, except for KS, showed a higher VH throughout the study period. Among the RM-GIC, VI showed a significantly higher VH at 12 months than at 1 day. The VH of PF diminished in the final stage of the study, whereas that of FU stabilized. SIGNIFICANCE: The results suggest that the addition of resins to the GIC did not appear to improve the surface microhardness of these materials. Furthermore, the surface microhardness of both the conventional and resin-modified glass-ionomers suffered variations over time. However, these materials should not be deemed inadequate for use in clinical applications. Probably, conventional and resin-modified GICs placed in the oral environment would not be affected to the same extent as in in vitro tests.

Analysis of Variance↗

Creep and visco-elastic recovery of cured and secondary-cured composites and resin-modified glass-ionomers.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this investigation was to study whether secondary curing had any effect or not on the visco-elastic stability of resin-based restoratives. MATERIALS: Five resin composite restorative materials (Tetric, Z100, Lite-fil, Palfique, Graft LC) and two resin-modified glass-ionomers (RM-GIC) (Fuji II LC&Photac-Bond), were chosen as representative of those clinically available. METHODS: Specimens were fabricated as short cylinders (6 mm x 4 mm), with and without secondary oven cure (120 degrees C, 7 min). A creep measurement apparatus was used to subject each specimen in turn to a cycle of constant compressive stress of 50 MPa for 6 h followed by 6 h of strain recovery, after load removal. Time-dependent creep and recovery were recorded. RESULTS: The creep curves of these VLC materials during loading and unloading were characterised by an initial rapid elastic deformation, greater than 1%, followed by a visco-elastic response. During unloading there was an initial elastic recovery, followed by the creep recovery, and finally permanent set. Secondary-cure had no statistically significant effect (p > 0.05) on maximum creep strain (Y1) which was 1-2% for resin-composites and 3-4% for RM-GIC. Permanent set for the RM-GIC were 0.68-0.77% and for resin-composites ranged from 0.13-0.46%. The influence of secondary-cure on creep recovery and permanent set was limited. However, some materials (Z100. Lite-fil and Photac-Bond) had permanent set significantly reduced (p < 0.05) by application of a second cure. SIGNIFICANCE: Visco-elastic creep values of less than 2% are acceptable for composites at the stress-levels applied. However the two-fold increase in creep response by RM-GIC suggests that these materials are unsuitable for stress-bearing areas.

Composite Resins↗

Fracture toughness of conventional, resin-modified glass-ionomer and composite luting cements.

OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted to determine if significant differences existed between the fracture toughness of three types of luting cement, and, if the method of mixing conventional glass-ionomer luting cements, hand-mixed or mechanically mixed, influenced the value obtained. METHODS: Three types of luting cement were investigated: conventional glass-ionomer cement (two handmixed and two capsulated cements, KetacCem, Fuji I and KetacCem Maxicap, Fuji Cap I), a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (Vitremer Luting Cement) and a resin composite cement (Scotchbond Resin Cement). Eleven specimens of each of the six cements were fabricated to determine the plane strain fracture toughness using the chevron notch short rod technique. After seven days the specimens were loaded in a water bath, at a crosshead speed of 4 microns/s and the fracture toughness values calculated. RESULTS: ANOVA indicated significant differences between the cements (p < 0.0001) and each cement was compared with all others using Fishers PSLD test (p < 0.05). The rank order of results from highest fracture toughness value to lowest (mean +/- s.d.) was Scotchbond Resin Cement (1.31 +/- 0.17), Vitremer Luting Cement (1.08 +/- 0.1), Fuji Cap I (0.37 +/- 0.04), KetacCem Maxicap (0.37 +/- 0.05), Fuji I (0.34 +/- 0.04), KetacCem (0.27 +/- 0.03). SIGNIFICANCE: Of the cements tested, the resin composite cement is most likely to resist clinical failure by cement cohesive failure.

Analysis of Variance↗

Effect of acidic primers on bonding between stainless steel and auto-polymerizing methacrylic resins.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of acidic primers on bonding between methacrylic resins and SUS 316 stainless steel. METHODS: The primers were single liquid metal conditioners containing either a phosphate monomer (Cesead opaque primer, CO; Metal primer, MP) or a carboxylic monomer (Super-Bond liquid, SB; Acryl bond, AB; MR bond, MR). Disk metal specimens were air-abraded with alumina followed by priming. The disks were bonded with a methacrylic resin using a brush-dip technique (Super-Bond C & B, CB or Repairsin, RE). Specimens were thermocycled in water and bond strengths were determined. RESULTS: Shear bond strengths after the thermocycling were 11.9 MPa for CO-CB, 7.6 MPa for CO-RE, 4.9 MPa for SB-RE, 3.9 MPa for MP-RE, 3.3 MPa for AB-RE, 2.5 MPa for MR-RE, 1.9 MPa for None-CB, and 0 MPa for None-RE. The two systems primed with CO primer showed greater bond strengths than the other groups (P < 0.05). Of the two systems conditioned with CO primer, CB resin demonstrated higher value bond strength as compared with RE resin (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Among the systems examined, CO primer used together with CB resin exhibited greater bond strength to SUS 316 stainless steel than other systems after the ageing test. Reduction in bond strength by thermocycling, however, was remarkable for all groups.

Acids↗

Bovine serum albumin (BSA) as a reagent against non-specific immunogold labeling on LR-White and epoxy resin.

The purpose of this study was to examine how different incubation times with different concentrations of bovine serum albumin (BSA) affect the amount of non-specific immunogold labeling on epoxy sections and LR-White sections. Immunogold labeling was performed on epoxy sections and LR-White sections of renal tissue with IgG-deposits and fibrin clots, and the antibodies used were anti-IgG and anti-fibrinogen, respectively. The sections were incubated with different concentrations of BSA prior to application of primary antibodies, and the length of this pre-incubation step varied between 0 and 4 h. During the incubation with primary antibodies, BSA was added in the same concentration as in the pre-incubation step. The results showed that the non-specific labeling on the resin decreased significantly when the concentration of BSA or the length of the preincubation step was increased. The non-specific labeling was usually higher on the epoxy resin than on the LR-White resin when using the same conditions with respect to BSA. But, when the preincubation step with BSA lasted 4 h, the non-specific labeling was somewhat lower on epoxy resin than on the acrylic LR-White resin, without respect to the concentration of BSA. The specific labeling for both fibrinogen and IgG decreased slightly when the concentration of BSA and incubation time increased, probably due to the steric hindrance performed by BSA molecules on the section. Blocking procedures with at least 1 h incubation time for the blocking step with at least 5% BSA are recommended for both epoxy and LR-White sections.

Acrylic Resins↗

Bonding of light-cured glass ionomer cement to polycarbonate resin treated with experimental primers.

The effect of experimental primers on the shear bond strength of polycarbonate composite resin with light-cured glass ionomer cements was investigated. Mixtures of methylmethacrylate (MMA) with the comonomers 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA), triethyleneglycol methacrylate (TEGDMA), and bisphenol-A-glycidymethacrylate (bisGMA) were used as primers. Polycarbonate composite resin rods of circular cross section and plates were bonded, with and without precured and nonprecured primers, using 2 light-cured glass ionomer cements (commercially available [LC] and experimental [EX]). In addition, commercial polycarbonate composite resin brackets with precured 50% TEGDMA/MMA primer were bonded to etched human enamel with both cements. Shear bond strengths were measured. Results were compared by ANOVA and Scheffe's tests at P = .05. The 30% HEMA/MMA, 50% TEGDMA/ MMA, 10% bisGMA/MMA, and 30% bisGMA/MMA primers produced the higher shear bond strengths (9.5 to 20.8 MPa) with LC and EX to polycarbonate composite resin. The 50% TEGDMA/MMA primer was most effective in improving the shear bond strengths of both LC and EX. Precured 50% TEGDMA/ MMA primer on a commercial resin bracket was effective in providing good shear bond strength to enamel.

Acrylic Resins↗