Intravascular clotting and afibrinogenemia, the presumptive lethal factors in the syndrome of amniotic fluid embolism.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · Search PubMed
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: Thromboembolic venous disease is a possible lethal condition which is very often present in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of clinically occult pulmonary embolism (PE) in a group of patients with recent proximal deep venous thrombosis (DVT), and the relationship between prevalence of PE and DVT extension, echographic features of the thrombi, anticoagulant therapy administered. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study enrolled 93 patients with DVT of the proximal lower extremities, without clinical symptoms and signs of PE. All patients were submitted to echo color-Doppler and ventilation-perfusion lung scan. The results were analysed by a score system for the echographic scan and by a series of probability criteria, as recommended by the PIOPED investigators, for the lung scan. RESULTS: All patients were recognised to suffer from proximal DVT. High probability lung scans for PE were found in 43 subjects (46.2%), intermediate probability in 14 (15%), low probability in 7 (7.7%), very low-normal in 29 (31.1%). The prevalence of PE failed to show any significant difference with respect to DVT extension, ultrasonographic features of the thrombi and anticoagulant therapy administered. CONCLUSIONS: The results obtained show a high prevalence of asymptomatic PE in patients with DVT, and suggest the need of an extensive use of lung scan in this kind of patients, and the utility of an early detection of DVT, in order to establish an intense antithrombotic therapy, irrespective of the extension of the thrombus with US.
BACKGROUND: Pulmonary embolism is a common complication of deep vein thrombosis. It has been established that low molecular weight heparin may be used to treat deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism and randomized studies have established that outpatient management of deep vein thrombosis with low molecular weight heparin is at least as effective as in-hospital management with unfractionated heparin. METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study of eligible patients with pulmonary embolism managed as outpatients using dalteparin (200 U/kg s/c daily) for a minimum of five days and warfarin for 3 months. Outpatients included those managed exclusively out of hospital and those managed initially for 1-3 days as inpatients who then completed therapy out of hospital. Reasons for admission included hemodynamic instability; hypoxia requiring oxygen therapy; admission for another medical reason; severe pain requiring parenteral analgesia or high risk of major bleeding. Patients were followed for three months for clinically apparent recurrent venous thromboembolism and bleeding. RESULTS: Between three teaching hospitals, a total of 158 patients with pulmonary embolism were identified. Fifty patients were managed as inpatients and 108 as outpatients. Of the outpatients, 27 were managed for an average of 2.5 days as inpatients and then completed dalteparin therapy as outpatients. The remaining 81 patients were managed exclusively as outpatients with dalteparin. For all outpatients the overall symptomatic recurrence rate of venous thromboembolism was 5.6% (6/108) with only 1.9% (2/108) major bleeds. There were a total of four deaths with none due to pulmonary embolism or major bleed. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective study suggests that outpatient management of pulmonary embolism is feasible and safe for the majority of patients.
BACKGROUND: Women taking hormone replacement therapy (HRT) have a 2- to 5-fold increased risk of venous thrombosis compared with nonusers. Increasingly, evidence has suggested that the size of the risk increase varies according to related factors, such as the type of estrogen used, the mode of delivery, and the presence of other predisposing factors. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to examine the current literature to assess the varying risk of venous thrombosis among women taking HRT. METHODS: An extensive search was carried out on all major electronic databases including MEDLINE 1995 to October 2005 and BIS (EMBASE) 1980 to October 2005. Relevant keywords relating to thrombosis (venous thromboembolism, venous thrombosis, deep vein thrombosis, and pulmonary embolism) combined with hormones (hormone replacement therapy and estrogen) were used to capture all potentially relevant studies. RESULTS: The increased risk of a first episode of venous thrombosis in women currently taking HRT compared with nonusers ranged from 1.22 (95% CI, 0.76-1.94) to 4.50 (95% CI, 1.30-15.10). Similar increases in risks for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism were found. The risk of venous thrombosis is the highest in the first year of therapy, durich which as much as a greater than 6-fold increase was found. Women taking estrogen-progestin HRT had a significantly greater risk of venous thrombosis than those using estrogen-only preparations (odds ratio [OR], 1.60; 95% CI, 1.13-2.26). Studies have also suggested a dose-related effect, suggesting high-dose estrogen therapy is associated with a greater increased risk of venous thrombosis than low-dose preparations. Comparisons between oral and transdermal HRT have shown a significant difference in the relative risk of venous thrombosis (OR, 4.0; 95% CI, 1.9-8.3) favoring the use of transdermal preparations. The presence of thrombophilia, particularly factor V Leiden, further amplifies the risk of venous thrombosis in women using HRT (OR, 13.16; 95% CI, 4.28-40.47). The presence of other risk factors, such as increasing age and being overweight, were all shown to be associated with a further increase in the risk of venous thrombosis. CONCLUSIONS: Recent studies have confirmed that current users of HRT are at increased risk of venous thrombosis. The increase in risk has been shown to vary according to duration of use, with the risk being greatest during the first year of use. Moreover, the increased risk varies according to the type of preparation and presence of additional risk factors such as increasing age, obesity, cancer, and recent surgery. Few studies have examined the relationship between thrombophilia, HRT and venous thrombosis; thus, more research is required in this area before accurate estimates of the risk can be made.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
A 33-year-old man had suffered recurrent arterial embolisms. Echocardiography identified as the most likely cause a large mobile mass in the left ventricle. Initially a primary heart tumor was discussed, but the ECG finding of an anterolateral scar and an angiographically proven LAD-stenosis were suspicious of an organized thrombus of the left ventricle. After surgical excision, histological analysis classified the mass as an organized thrombus.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Using the radiofibrinogen test and perfusion lung scanning (2-phase pharmacoscintigraphy), the incidence of postoperative thrombosis and pulmonary embolism was determined in a group of 362 operated patients. Low-dose heparin administration (twice 5000 IU daily) was given to 162, combined heparin and dihydroergotamine administration (5000 IU heparin and 0.5 mg dihydroergotamine daily) to 150, while 50 patients received no prophylactic treatment. There was a significant decrease in thrombo-embolism in the heparin/DHE group (8.7% deep-vein thrombosis; 2.7% pulmonary embolism) compared with the heparin group (19.8% and 5.5%, respectively) and the control group (30% and 14%, respectively).
BACKGROUND: Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) with pulmonary embolization (PE) often occurs as an unexpected event with fatal consequences. This provides a setting for malpractice claims. METHODS: We reviewed 160 consecutive malpractice claims submitted by attorneys for medical expert review during the 11-year period ending in 1997. Seven cases involved DVT with PE. RESULTS: Alleged failure to anticipate and reduce the chance of PE was the basis for six of the claims. All six patients were at risk for lower extremity DVT, and one had a history of DVT 6 months earlier. The PE was manifested by sudden death in three cases. The seventh case represented a complication of heparin therapy for PE. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that risk management for PE should focus primarily on DVT. Physicians should perform and document an examination for DVT whenever there is a history of lower extremity stasis or it is likely to occur. They should also consider documenting a concurring second opinion when making anticoagulant-related decisions.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
AIMS: While right intracardiac thrombosis (IT) is a potential cause of pulmonary embolism (PE) similar to that of stroke in left-sided IT, its prevalence and prognostic significance has not been studied in the general population. The aim of this study was to assess the age- and gender-specific prevalence of IT and its relation to PE in a population-based autopsy cohort. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between 1970 and 1982, 23 796 autopsies, representing 84% of all in-hospital deaths in the Malmö city population, were performed, using a standardized procedure. The relationship between IT and PE was evaluated by cohort analyses and nested case-control studies. IT was present in 1706 (7.2%) patients, 727 and 747 of whom had right and left atrial IT, respectively. PE prevalence in patients with isolated left IT, isolated right IT, and combined IT was 28.5, 35.6, and 48.9%, with RR (95% CI) of 1.5 (1.3-1.8), 2.0 (1.6-2.5), and 3.5 (2.7-4.7), respectively, compared with age- and gender-matched controls. Patients dying from ischaemic heart disease had a 3.2 (2.7-3.6) times higher risk of right IT, which was associated with 43% PE prevalence. Of all patients with PE at autopsy, right IT was found in 354 (6.5%), and the only detected source of PE in 220 (4.0%). CONCLUSION: Right cardiac thrombosis, though difficult to assess clinically, is as common as left cardiac thrombosis and is associated with an increased risk of PE. The diagnosis should be considered in all cases of PE, especially in patients with atrial fibrillation or myocardial infarction and in the absence of confirmed deep vein thrombosis.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the results of thromboembolic prophylaxis using enoxaparin in acute spinal injury patients. BACKGROUND: Deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism are major causes of morbidity and mortality in patients with acute spinal injuries. A wide range of thromboprophylactic measures have been proposed. The present study describes the outcome of a regime of enoxaparin and antithromboembolic stockings in acute spinal injuries irrespective of neurological damage. SETTING: Scotland, UK. METHODS: Eighteen-month retrospective review of acute spinal injury patients admitted to a national spinal injuries unit. A thromboembolic prophylactic regimen of early mobilisation, use of antithromboembolic stockings, and subcutaneous administration of enoxaparin 40 mg once a day until patients could be mobilised for more than 4 h per day, was used. Patients with clinical suspicion of deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism were investigated as appropriate. RESULTS: Out of 146 (53% of total) patients with spinal injuries with no neurological deficit only one patient (0.4%) developed clinical evidence of pulmonary embolism and out of 130 (47% of total) with spinal cord injury two (0.7%) developed clinical evidence of deep venous thrombosis while still on enoxaparin. Four patients (1.5%) developed deep venous thrombosis and one (0.4%) pulmonary embolism after discontinuing enoxaparin. There were no fatal pulmonary emboli and one suspected intraspinal bleeding. CONCLUSIONS: The present study suggests that, in addition to physical and mechanical measures, low molecular weight heparin in the form of enoxaparin 40 mg administered once daily compares favourably with previous studies for thromboprophylaxis in acute spinal injuries.
Risk factors of the development of phlebothrombosis and thromboembolism of the pulmonary artery (TEPA) were estimated in 257 patients as associated both with the patient and the trauma. The factors influencing the development of risk factors were: bed immobilization, age older than 40, heart failure and respiratory insufficiency, fractures of the lower extremities, skeleton traction, obesity, thrombosis of lower extremities, previous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, floating clot. Risk factors of the development of vein thrombosis associated with trauma included the presence of lower extremity fractures, skeletal traction or immobilization in bandage, mechanism of injury and type of trauma.
OBJECTIVE: To study the incidence of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism at King Abdul Aziz University Hospital. To determine the risk factors, use of different diagnostic modalities, treatment given and to compare our findings with those reported in the literature. METHODS: Retrospective study which included all cases of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism admitted to the medical ward of King Abdul Aziz University Hospital during the period between January 1994 till March 1999 were analyzed. RESULTS: Total of 75 patients were diagnosed to have deep vein thrombosis with mean age of 44.16 +/- 14.5 years and male:female ratio of 1:2. Doppler ultrasound was used for the diagnosis in 56 of 75 patients (75%). Pulmonary embolism as a complication of deep vein thrombosis developed in 24 of 75 patients (32%). Prolonged immobilization was found to be the most common risk factor 17 of 75 (23%). All the patients were treated with conventional heparin followed by warfarin. CONCLUSION: As discussed, our results are comparable with those reported in the literature. Post operative patients who are anticipated to have prolonged immobilization should receive prophylactic anti coagulation with subcutaneous heparin. Thrombophillia screening should be reserved for those with recurrent deep vein thrombosis or patients with positive family history.