Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “PROSTATECTOMY”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,315 records · Page 73Linked to original sources

Is Hispanic race an important predictor of treatment failure following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer?

PURPOSE: Hispanic-Americans are the fastest growing minority group in the United States. Many studies have compared prostate cancer treatment outcomes between black and white men, but few such studies have been done with Hispanic men. We compared clinical and pathological features as well as the treatment failure rate of radical prostatectomy in contemporaneously treated groups of Hispanic and white men with prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 1995 and 2002, 136 Hispanic men and 315 white men underwent radical prostatectomy. Treatment failure was defined as having a prostate specific antigen (PSA) of 0.2 or greater more than 8 weeks after surgery or receiving any adjuvant therapy. Known predictors of failure and race were evaluated for their ability to predict treatment failure. RESULTS: Median followup was 32 months for Hispanic and 36 months for white patients. Hispanic men were older, had a higher percentage of abnormal rectal examinations, Gleason 7 tumors and preoperative PSA levels greater than 10. Preoperative PSA, specimen Gleason score, pathological stage and surgical margin were all strongly associated with treatment failure (p<0.001). Despite differences in clinical characteristics, overall failure rates did not differ between Hispanic and white men (18.7% vs 17.8%). The odds ratio for treatment failure for Hispanic relative to white men after adjusting for the previously mentioned risk factors was 0.87 (95% CI [0.44, 1.68], p = 0.670). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that Hispanic race does not influence the treatment failure rate of radical prostatectomy in contemporaneously treated patients with prostate cancer at 1 institution. To our knowledge this study represents the largest of its kind, but longer followup and other confirmatory studies are needed.

Hispanic or Latino↗

CYP3A4 genetic variant and disease-free survival among white and black men after radical prostatectomy.

PURPOSE: Prostate cancer is an androgen sensitive disease. Cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) oxidatively deactivates testosterone by converting it to biologically less active metabolites. Previous studies suggest that a germline genetic variant in the 5' regulatory region of the gene may interfere with deactivation and increase the risk of clinically advanced prostate cancer. We investigated the impact of this polymorphism on the risk of recurrence after prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We assembled clinical data and analyzed specimens from a large series of patients who underwent prostatectomy who were carefully staged at a single institution and had 5 to 10 years of prospective clinical followup. The series included 428 white men and 309 black men. RESULTS: Stage, Gleason score or preoperative prostate specific antigen strongly predicted progression-free survival (PFS) but were not associated with CYP3A4 genotypes. There was a strong association between race and genotype (p = 0.00002) in that 8% of white men and 83% of black men had 1 or more copies of the G allele. When both races were included genotype was associated with PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.27, CI 1.08-1.27, p = 0.005). In race specific analyses increasing copies of the G allele were associated with poorer PFS among white men (HR 1.98, CI 1.06-3.70, p = 0.03) but had little impact on PFS among black men (HR 1.004, CI 0.77-1.32, p = 0.97). CONCLUSIONS: The CYP3A4 genotype studied was not associated with pathological features of prostate cancer for men of either race. Unstratified analyses of men of both races and stratified analyses of white men demonstrated poorer PFS after prostatectomy for those with the G allele, but the G allele did not predict PFS among black men.

Aged↗

Radical prostatectomy with preservation of urinary continence: pathology and long-term results.

PURPOSE: A continence sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy is described and evaluated. Results are compared with those of patients who underwent a standard anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy previously by the same surgeon. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 275 consecutive patients underwent a continence sparing radical prostatectomy by a single surgeon (DLG) between 1996 and 2003. The technique is described in detail. RESULTS: Total continence (no pad or device) was found immediately upon catheter removal in 36% of patients, within 14 days in 69% and within 7 weeks in 78%, compared to 1%, 6% and 41% of 80 patients who underwent the standard operation. Median time to total continence was 1 day for the new group versus 63 days for the standard surgery group. Positive margins were found in 6.9% of the new group versus 11% of the first 80 patients. Of the former patients 80% have a prostate specific antigen of less than 0.2 ng/ml at an average followup of 12.5 years. With the new procedure 90% of patients have a prostate specific antigen of less than 0.2 ng/ml with an average followup of 5.2 years. There was no operative mortality or unusual complication. The typical patient was discharged home 1 to 3 days postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Preservation of the continence mechanism at the level of the bladder neck and proximal prostatic urethra results in earlier return of continence without adversely affecting cancer control. It is a relatively simple way to improve surgical results.

Aged↗

Transperitoneal or extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: does the approach matter?

PURPOSE: : The greater accuracy of apical dissection and reconstruction in our first 100 patients undergoing transperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (TLRP) was not matched by a proportionate increase in the rate of return to normal continence compared with our prior open prostatectomy experience. We postulated that greater bladder dysfunction due to the almost total bladder dissection mandated by TLRP might be responsible and this might be rectified by the adoption of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy using an extraperitoneal approach (ELRP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: : A total of 100 patients undergoing TLRP were compared with 100 undergoing ELRP. The groups were subdivided into halves to investigate the influence of any learning curve effect. All patients had clinical stage T3aN0M0 or less prostate cancer and they were operated on by a single surgeon. RESULTS: : Mean operative time (238.9 vs 190.6 minutes), blood loss (310.5 vs 201.5 ml), postoperative hospitalization (3.8 vs 2.6 nights) and catheterization duration (11.3 vs 10.1 days) were significantly greater in the TLRP group. After the first 50 cases were excluded in each group statistical significance persisted only for operative time (218.3 vs 184.2 minutes) and hospitalization (3.5 vs 2.5 nights). The pad-free rate was significantly lower 3 months following ELRP (80% vs 56%, p = 0.02). The overall 12-month pad-free rate for TLRP and ELRP was 90% and 96%, respectively. The overall 12-month erection rate for TLRP and ELRP was 61% and 82%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: : ELRP is superior to TLRP with respect to operative time, hospitalization and early continence.

Adenocarcinoma↗

A comparison of minimally invasive open and laparoscopic radical retropubic prostatectomy.

PURPOSE: A cohort of more than 1,000 patients undergoing open minimally invasive radical retropubic prostatectomy (mini-lap RRP, 8.0 cm incision) is compared to published series of laparoscopic radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cohort of 209 consecutive patients undergoing mini-lap RRP at Emory University Hospital was evaluated. Characteristics noted were patient age, comorbidity status, preoperative prostate specific antigen, operative time, perioperative complications, blood transfusions, pathological staging, potency and continence. Postoperative analgesia was analyzed in a cohort of 30 consecutive recent patients. These data were compared to published reports of similar perioperative characteristics in laparoscopic RRP series. RESULTS: Differences between the cohorts of patients reviewed were found in age, preoperative prostate specific antigen, operative time and rate of blood transfusion. The series were comparable in comorbidity status, postoperative complications, rates of incontinence, rates of impotence and margin positivity. Analgesic use was quantified in a small group of patients according to the amount of narcotic analgesia required during the postoperative hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: Mini-lap RRP can generally be performed in less time and at less cost than most laparoscopic radical prostatectomies. It can be performed with regional anesthesia and has excellent postoperative results compared to contemporary laparoscopic procedures. Mini-lap RRP requires less training than laparoscopic RRP. With its minimal morbidity, mini-lap RRP remains an attractive technique that can easily be adopted by the experienced retropubic surgeon.

Adult↗

Does fibrin sealant decrease immediate urinary leakage following radical retropubic prostatectomy?

PURPOSE: We determined the effectiveness of fibrin sealant in decreasing postoperative urinary leakage following radical retropubic prostatectomy performed by 1 surgeon at Washington Hospital Center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between April and November 2003 our group treated 32 consecutive patients with prostate cancer with radical retropubic prostatectomy. The first 16 patients (control) underwent the Walsh described technique and the second group of 16 patients had an additional application of fibrin sealant around the urethro vesical anastomosis. Postoperative drain output was measured every 8 hours. The results of the 2 groups were compared. RESULTS: The Blake drain was removed after 4 nursing shifts (times 1 through 4) in 81% (13 of 16) of the control group and in 100% (16 of 16) of the fibrin sealant group. The fibrin sealant group had significantly less drainage output overall compared with the control group (p = 0.005). The drainage output from each group decreased with time at a significant rate independent of each other (p <0.001), and there was a larger difference (p = 0.04) in output between groups at times 1 and 2 compared with times 3 and 4. There was no relationship between the amount of urinary drainage and drain output. There was no immediate morbidity associated with the use of fibrin sealant. CONCLUSIONS: The application of fibrin sealant to the urethro vesical anastomosis during radical retropubic prostatectomy does decrease postoperative drain output. With earlier drain removal, patients would benefit from less discomfort and from skilled nursing requirements. In select patients early drain removal could accelerate discharge home.

Aged↗

Impact of prostate size and body mass index on perioperative morbidity after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

PURPOSE: We prospectively evaluated the impact of body mass index (BMI) and prostate gland size on operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL) and hospital stay (LOS) in patients undergoing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy at our institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 70 consecutive laparoscopic radical prostatectomies were performed at our institution from May 2002 to April 2003. Patients who had pelvic lymphadenectomy were excluded. A total of 62 cases were available for analysis. Two cases were converted to open surgery. Perioperative data on each group were recorded, including patient age, height, weight, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, prostate specific antigen, operative time, EBL, time to regular diet and LOS. Pathology data, including specimen weight, Gleason score and the margin status, were reviewed. Patients were grouped into 3 categories based on obesity, as measured by BMI (25 or less, 26 to 29 and greater than 29 kg/m) and prostatic gland size (less than 30, 30 to 50 g, and greater than 50 gm). Furthermore, an analysis of our initial 20, middle 20 and last 22 cases was also performed. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 63 years and mean American Society of Anesthesiologists score was 2.4. Mean operative time was 247 minutes and average EBL was 413 cc. The average LOS in all groups was 2.2 days. There were no statistically significant differences in operative parameters (operative time, EBL or LOS) among the ideal body weight (BMI 25 kg/m or less), overweight (BMI 26 to 29) and obese (BMI greater than 29) groups. The initial 20 cases, the second 20 and the last 22 had similar operative time, EBL and LOS. The surgical margin positive rate in our series was 17.7% for all stages. Of the patients 82% were completely dry at 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort of patient body mass index (25 or less, 26 to 29 and greater than 29 kg/m) did not have a significant impact on operative or postoperative morbidity. However, a positive correlation between prostate gland size (greater than 50 gm) and EBL approached but did not achieve statistical significance. Laparoscopic prostatectomy can be performed safely in obese patients and patients with a large prostate gland.

Adult↗

Absorbable versus nonabsorbable graft: outcome of bone anchored male sling for post-radical prostatectomy incontinence.

PURPOSE: We determined the outcome of the bone anchored male sling procedure for stress urinary incontinence in men regarding the graft material used. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 39 men with post-radical prostatectomy incontinence received a perineal bone anchored male sling. Patients with previous salvage external beam radiotherapy and high serum prostate specific antigen, incontinence due to neurogenic or posttraumatic etiology, or previous benign prostatectomy were excluded. Urodynamic evaluation was performed preoperatively. The number of pads daily used by patients was recorded preoperatively and during postoperative visits. To compress the urethra 2 types of materials were used. Absorbable biomaterials were used in the first 12 patients and nonabsorbable material was used in the following 27. RESULTS: Mean patient age +/- SD was 67.3 years (range 50 to 79). The mean duration between radical prostatectomy and male sling surgery was 57.9 +/- 40.4 months (range 5 to 135). The procedure was successful in 26 patients (96.2%) in the nonabsorbable group and in 1 (8.3%) in the absorbable group at a mean followup of 18.9 and 28.8 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The absorbable sling materials that were used for the bone anchored male sling demonstrated disintegration of the material. Autolysis of these absorbable materials removed active compression forces on the urethra after a short period. Nonabsorbable graft is associated with the best outcome following the perineal bone anchored male sling procedure.

Absorbable Implants↗

Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with the Heilbronn technique: oncological results in the first 500 patients.

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy has become an accepted alternative to open surgery. However, there is still a lack of data concerning the oncological outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From March 1999 to July 2004, 1,078 patients underwent laparoscopic radical prostatectomy at our institution. Oncological results in the first 500 patients with a minimal followup of 23 months were analyzed, focusing on positive margins, prostate specific antigen (PSA) failure, clinical progression and survival. RESULTS: Median followup was 40 months (range 23 to 65). Of the patients 417 underwent pelvic lymph node dissection, which revealed positive nodes in 6 (1.2%). Positive margins were documented in 22 of 296 pT2 tumors (7.4%), 27 of 107 pT3a tumors (25.2%) and 29 of 69 pT3b tumors (42.0%). PSA recurrence was diagnosed in 55 patients (11.0%) at a mean of 20.8 months (range 6 to 36) that is stages pT2a, pT2b, pT3a and pT3b/4 in 3.2%, 6.5%, 15.9% and 23.9%, respectively. PSA progression-free rates were 83.0% at 3 years and 73.1% at 5 years. Two patients died of disease and 6 died of other causes (99.2% overall survival). The clinical progression rate was to 4.1% at 3 years and 9.8% at 5 years. No port site metastasis was observed. CONCLUSIONS: At centers of expertise laparoscopic radical prostatectomy may provide an oncological outcome similar to that of the open procedure. However, it offers the advantages of minimally invasive surgery.

Adult↗

The effect of hospital volume on cancer control after radical prostatectomy.

PURPOSE: For complex oncological procedures, hospital volume affects short and long-term patient outcome. We examined the association of hospital volume and long-term cancer control after radical prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: With a cohort study design, we used the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare linked files to identify a population based sample of men with newly diagnosed prostate cancer treated primarily with radical prostatectomy. Failure of cancer control was defined as the use of postoperative medical or surgical hormone ablation or treatment with radiation therapy more than 6 months after surgery. RESULTS: A total of 12,635 men underwent radical prostatectomy for incident prostate cancer. After adjusting for age, comorbidity, histological grade and clinical stage, the risk of adjuvant therapy was greater among those treated at low (1 to 33 cases) and medium (34 to 61 cases) volume hospitals than at very high (more than 108 cases) volume hospitals (HR 1.25, p <0.001 and HR 1.11, p =0.023 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated at lower volume institutions are at increased risk of initiation of subsequent adjuvant therapy with radiation therapy, medical hormone ablation or orchiectomy. Noted differences in cancer control provide additional evidence regarding issues surrounding the debate over surgical volume standards for the surgical treatment of prostate cancer.

Aged↗

Comparison of training modalities for performing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: experience with 1,000 patients.

PURPOSE: We report a detailed analysis of different training modalities on the transferability of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy to generations of surgeons. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The first generation surgeon with experience with 600 cases and the second generation surgeon with 150 were trained in open retropubic radical prostatectomy and laparoscopy, whereas the third generation surgeon with 150 cases was trained only laparoscopically. The fourth generation of surgeons with a total of 50 cases was trained in our fellowship program. We analyzed groups of 50 operations. The groups were comparable with respect to patient age, prostate weight and pathological tumor stage. RESULTS: We observed a continual decrease in operative time between (322 to 247 minutes.) and within (332 to 196 minutes.) the analyzed groups. This result was also expressed in a decrease in the time required for anastomosis. A significant decrease was observed for the initial transfusion rate (4% to 10%). No difference was found in the complication rate (ie conversion in 8% to 0% of cases). Pathological outcomes (ie positive margins for pT2/pT3) were comparable in the first 3 surgeon groups (14.9%, 14.2% and 22%, respectively) and available functional results (followup greater than 2 years) did not reveal any influence of the learning curve. A learning curve was observed only for overall operative time and the time required for anastomosis but it was shown to be significantly shorter for the following generations. CONCLUSIONS: Based on a specific training program the personal level of education has a minor impact on the results and reproducibility of the laparoscopic radical prostatectomy technique.

Clinical Competence↗

Extraperitoneal laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a prospective evaluation of 600 cases.

PURPOSE: We report our experience with the extraperitoneal approach to laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. We describe the technique, clinical and oncological results, and functional outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From February 2002, to March 2004, 600 laparoscopic radical prostatectomies were performed by an extraperitoneal approach and evaluated prospectively. RESULTS: A total of 599 extraperitoneal procedures were performed successfully. Mean operative time was 173 minutes. Mean operative blood loss was 380 cc. The transfusion rate was 1.2%. The major and minor complications rate was 2.3% and 9.2%, respectively. The reoperation rate was 1.7%. Mean hospital stay was 6.3 days. Pathological stage was pT2 and pT3 in 72% and 28% of cases, respectively. Mean Gleason score was 7. The overall positive margin rate was 17.7% (14.6% and 25.6% of pT2 and pT3 tumors, respectively). Median followup was 12 months. Of the patients 95% had prostate specific antigen less than 0.2 ng/ml. Patients were evaluated by a self-questionnaire sent by mail before and after surgery (International Continence Society and International Index of Erectile Function-5). At a median followup of 12 months 84% of the patients were continent (no pad), 7% used 1 precautionary pad and 7% needed 1 pad routinely. At a median followup of 6 months in preoperatively potent patients (International Index of Erectile Function-5 greater than 20) the postoperative erection and intercourse rate was 64% and 43%, respectively, in those with bilateral nerve bundle preservation. CONCLUSIONS: The extraperitoneal technique is a reliable approach to laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Aged↗

Cavernous nerve reconstruction to preserve erectile function following non-nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy: a prospective study.

Erectile dysfunction following radical prostatectomy for treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer remains a problem that deters many men from seeking surgical treatment. Sparing the cavernous nerves has been popularized as a method of preserving potency, but men with locally advanced disease may be at increased risk for positive margins with this technique. In this study, sural nerve grafting of the cavernous nerve bundles, to preserve postoperative potency while potentially maximizing cancer control, was examined. Thirty men were enrolled in this prospective phase I study and underwent non-nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy performed by one of two protocol surgeons. Preoperative erectile function was assessed both objectively, using a RigiScan (Timm Medical Technologies, Inc., Eden Prairie, Minn.), and subjectively. The cavernous nerves were identified and resected during the operation with the use of an intraoperative mapping device (CaverMap; Alliant Medical Technologies, Norwood, Mass.). Bilateral autologous sural nerve grafting to the cavernous nerve stumps was performed by one of two protocol plastic surgeons. Postoperative erectile dysfunction therapy, using intracorporeal injection, a vacuum pump, and/or oral sildenafil therapy, was instituted 6 weeks after the operation. Spontaneous erectile activity was subjectively and objectively measured every 3 months after the operation. Follow-up periods ranged from 13 to 33 months (mean, 23 months). Overall, 18 of 30 patients (60 percent) demonstrated both objective and subjective evidence of spontaneous erectile activity. Of those 18 men, 13 (72 percent) were able to have intercourse (seven unassisted and six with the aid of sildenafil). No disease or biochemical recurrences have been noted in this group of patients with locally advanced disease. In conclusion, autologous sural nerve grafting after non-nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy is an effective means of preserving spontaneous erectile activity after the operation while maximizing cancer control potential.

Aged↗

Groin abscess: a vesico-cutaneous fistula to the groin. A rare complication of open prostatectomy.

In developed countries, open prostatectomy for benign disease is now reserved for large prostates. This is not the case in the developing world where Millin's prostatectomy continues to be an important procedure, perhaps due to lack of endoscopic technology and training. We report a case of vesico-cutaneous fistula as a late complication of open prostatectomy presenting as a groin mass. A review of the English language literature shows this to be the first case of its kind.

Abscess↗

Radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: local tumor extension and prognosis.

BACKGROUND: This study was performed to evaluate the frequency of local tumor extension and its effect on disease progression after radical prostatectomy. METHODS: The study consisted of 66 consecutive men who underwent radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer without any prior hormonal therapy. Cases were stratified according to pathologic findings. Sites of capsular penetration were also evaluated. RESULTS: The overall incidences of lymph node metastases, seminal vesicle invasion, capsular penetration, and positive surgical margin were, respectively, 23%, 32%, 55% and 35%. The disease progression rate in patients with positive lymph nodes differed significantly from that in those without nodal metastases (P < 0.0001). Although seminal vesicle invasion, capsular penetration, or positive surgical margin had an adverse effect on prognosis, the difference in progression missed statistical significance, when patients with positive lymph node metastases were excluded. The most common site of capsular penetration was posterolateral, in the area of the neurovascular bundle. CONCLUSIONS: Extraglandular tumor extension and positive surgical margins are common features of radical prostatectomy specimens. A nerve-sparing operation should be performed selectively and with great caution. The markedly adverse effect of lymph node involvement on progression must be accounted for when evaluating other variables relating to progression.

Aged↗

Correlation of transrectal ultrasonography and core biopsies with pathology results in radical prostatectomy specimens.

BACKGROUND: We compared preoperative tumor location, as identified by transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS), and TRUS-guided core biopsies with the final histopathological examination of radical prostatectomy specimens. METHODS: Thirty patients who had radical retropubic prostatectomy after evaluation with TRUS are included in the study. Diagnosis of prostate cancer was established with TRUS-guided systematic (3 cores from base, mid and apex of the peripheral zone, and 1 core from the transition zone of each side of the prostate) and lesion-directed core biopsies in all cases. Each prostate gland was halved for histopathological examination and results are reported in terms of "sides". RESULTS: Histopathological examination of the prostatectomy specimens revealed prostate cancer bilaterally in 29 glands (58 sides) and unilaterally in 1 gland. Preprostatectomy TRUS examinations missed cancer in 29 sides, and core biopsies were negative for cancer in 14 sides. CONCLUSION: This study revealed that 49% of prostate cancer lesions (n = 29 sides) were not recognized on TRUS and 52% of those (n = 15 sides) were diagnosed only by additional systematic biopsies. Furthermore, even with TRUS-guided systematic core biopsies, failure to detect the prostate cancer lesions may be as high as 24% (n = 14 sides).

Biopsy↗

Radical prostatectomy and adjuvant endocrine therapy for prostate cancer with or without preoperative androgen deprivation: Five-year results.

BACKGROUND: The effects of preoperative androgen deprivation on the outcomes of prostate cancer patients who received radical prostatectomy and subsequent adjuvant endocrine therapy have not yet been fully evaluated. METHODS: Patients with stage A(2), B or C prostate cancers were randomized to one of two groups: group I (n = 90), who received androgen deprivation (leuprolide and chlormadinone acetate) for 3 months followed by radical prostatectomy and subsequent adjuvant endocrine therapy (leuprolide alone), and group II (n = 86), who underwent the surgery followed by 3-month androgen deprivation (leuprolide and chlormadinone acetate) and subsequent adjuvant endocrine therapy (leuprolide alone). The effects of preoperative androgen deprivation on survival, clinical relapse (serum prostate specific antigen, PSA, above the normal level, local recurrence, or distant metastases), and PSA relapse (PSA above the detectable level) were evaluated at 5 years or later after treatment. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in overall, cause-specific, clinical relapse-free, or PSA relapse-free survival rates between the two groups. In a subanalysis, no prostate cancer deaths or clinical relapses were noted in 29 patients with organ-confined disease (OCD: negativity of capsular invasion, seminal vesicle invasion, surgical margins or nodal involvement). The odds ratio for OCD depending on group assignment was 2.44 (95% confidence interval, CI 1.04-5.72), for group I, demonstrating a higher probability of having OCD. This ratio was increased to 4.00 (95% CI 1.06-15.16) if the analysis was conducted in a subpopulation with prostate specific antigen levels less than 35.6 ng/mL and with clinical stage B or C cancers. CONCLUSION: Preoperative androgen deprivation has no demonstrable benefit in 5-year outcomes for patients undergoing radical prostatectomy and adjuvant endocrine therapy. However, it did increase the probability of OCD, which was associated with no clinical relapse during the follow-up. A longer observation is needed to clarify the exact extent of the benefits in terms of survival.

Aged↗

Is a limited lymphadenectomy targeting obturator nodes alone an adequate procedure for Japanese men undergoing radical prostatectomy?

BACKGROUND: The objective of the present study was to investigate the significance of pelvic lymphadenectomy during radical prostatectomy in Japanese men with prostate cancer. METHODS: A total of 178 consecutive patients who underwent radical prostatectomy and standard pelvic lymphadenectomy targeting the external iliac nodes and obturator fossa for clinically localized prostate cancer were studied. The median observation period of this series was 18 months (range: 3-36 months). RESULTS: Lymph node metastases were detected in 13 patients; that is, positive nodes were located in the external iliac nodes alone in seven patients, the obturator fossa alone in four patients, and both external iliac nodes and obturator fossa in two patients. Of these 13 patients, all of the seven with more than one positive node demonstrated biochemical recurrence, whereas five of the six with single node involvement remained without signs of biochemical recurrence. Furthermore, a single positive node was located in the external iliac region in five of the six patients. When a group at high-risk for lymph node metastasis was defined as those meeting more than two of the following three criteria: (i) pretreatment serum prostate specific antigen value > or = 20 ng/mL; (ii) biopsy Gleason sum > or = 8; or (iii) percentage of positive biopsy core > or = 50%, the incidence of lymph node metastasis was 24.5% in the high-risk group and 0.8% in the low-risk group. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that limited dissection of the obturator node alone may not be sufficient for Japanese men undergoing radical prostatectomy; therefore, we recommend performing standard pelvic lymphadenectomy targeting both the external iliac nodes and the obturator fossa for patients at high-risk of lymph node involvement.

Biopsy↗