Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “CEMENTATION”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,315 records · Page 73Linked to original sources
PubMed1993

Thermal conductivity of cement base materials.

This study was designed to determine the most efficient dentin-cement-restorative material system to minimize temperature changes from either a hot (58 degrees C) or cold (4 degrees C) source. Extracted human molar teeth were used to conduct the experiment utilizing a standard Class I occlusal preparation 3.5 mm in diameter with a remaining dentin thickness of 0.5 or 1.0 mm and a control dentin thickness of 2.0 mm. A bi-electrode thermocouple was utilized with one thermocouple mounted on the roof of the pulp chamber and the other on the occlusal surface of the specimen. The cements investigated were zinc oxide and eugenol (ZOE), zinc phosphate (ZP), glass ionomer (GI), and zinc polycarboxylate (ZPC) with a thickness of either 0.5 mm or 1.5 mm. Statistical analysis consisted of a one-way analysis of variance followed by a multiple means comparison test. For heated specimens consisting of cement and dentin only, ZOE was the least effective in limiting temperature change. When cold was applied, ZOE was the most effective. Statistically for cold application, the other three cements, ZP, GI and ZPC, and 2.0 mm of dentin were the same for limiting temperature change. When amalgam was used to restore the tooth, ZOE and GI were most effective in limiting temperature change for cooled teeth. For heated teeth, all the cements were identical except for ZOE, which was the least effective. For composite restored teeth, all cements and dentin were identical in limiting temperature changes for either heating or cooling.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Brushing abrasion of luting cements under neutral and acidic conditions.

Four resin based materials (Compolute Aplicap, ESPE; Variolink Ultra, Vivadent; C&B Metabond, Parkell and Panavia 21, Kuraray), two carboxylate cements (Poly-F Plus, Dentsply DeTrey and Durelon Maxicap, ESPE), two glass-ionomer cements (Fuji I, GC and Ketac-Cem Aplicap, ESPE), one resin-modified glass ionomer cement (Vitremer, 3M) one polyacid-modified resin composite (Dyract Cem, Dentsply DeTrey) and one zinc phosphate cement (Harvard, Richter & Hoffmann) were investigated according to their brushing resistance after storage in neutral and acidic buffer solutions. For this purpose 24 cylindrical acrylic molds were each filled with the materials. After hardening, the samples were stored for seven days in 100% relative humidity and at 37 degrees C. Subsequently, they were ground flat and polished. Then each specimen was covered with an adhesive tape leaving a 4 mm wide window on the cement surface. Twelve samples of each material were stored for 24 hours in a buffer solution with a pH of 6.8. The remaining 12 samples were placed in a buffer with a pH of 3.0. All specimens were then subjected to a three media brushing abrasion (2,000 strokes) in an automatic brushing machine. Storage and brushing were performed three times. After 6,000 brushing strokes per specimen, the tape was removed. Brushing abrasion was measured with a computerized laser profilometer and statistically analyzed with ANOVA and Tukey's Standardized Range Test (p < or = 0.05). The highest brushing abrasion was found for the two carboxylate cements. The lowest brushing abrasion was found for one resin based material, Compolute Aplicap. With the exception of three resin-based materials, a lower pH led to a higher brushing abrasion.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed1987

Effects of various cementation methods on the retention of prefabricated posts.

Para-Post dowels were cemented by using combinations of cement, cleansing agents, and dentinal treatments. The comparative retentive strengths were as follows: 1. Para-Post posts cemented with composite into mechanically corrugated post spaces recorded the greatest retention. 2. The retention of the posts cemented with composite into post spaces rinsed with 1 ml of 17% EDTA with a pH of 7.5 and followed immediately by 1 ml of 5.25% NaOCl was lowest. 3. The retention of the posts secured with zinc phosphate into mechanically corrugated post spaces was significantly higher than with untapped post spaces. 4. The retentive strength of the posts placed with glass-ionomer cement into post spaces, irrigated with 1 ml of 40% polyacrylic acid solution, and rinsed with distilled water was comparable to that of posts secured with zinc phosphate cement without roughened post spaces.

Cementation↗
PubMed1996

Ten years' clinical evaluation of three luting cements.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present clinical longitudinal study was to observe, over 10 years, the prognosis of abutment teeth restored with fixed prostheses retained by glass ionomer luting cements and one conventional zinc phosphate cement. METHODS: Three dentists prepared 135 abutment teeth in 61 patients to retain 81 fixed prostheses. The prostheses were retained by two glass ionomer luting cements (Ketac-Cem, Fuji Ionomer), or a conventional zinc phosphate cement (De Trey Zinc Zement Improved). The patients were examined yearly for 10 years. RESULTS: Post-operative hypersensitivity occurred in five teeth restored with glass ionomer luting cement. The prevailing reason for abutment tooth failure was secondary caries (n = 21) and pulp necrosis (n = 5). Non-parametric survival estimates indicated that 80-85% of the abutment teeth remained intact after 5 years and 71-81% after 10 years. CONCLUSIONS: The 10-year results indicate that the prognosis of abutment teeth restored with fixed prostheses is good, regardless of whether a glass ionomer or a zinc phosphate luting cement is used.

Dental Abutments↗
PubMed2005

Film thickness and fluidity of various luting cements determined using a trial indentation meter.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate a new trial apparatus which could measure film thickness (T(h)) under a low load, using an indenter. METHODS: Five commercial luting cements were measured using this apparatus. T(h) was determined using four kinds of indenter, which were 5.0, 10.0, 15.0 and 20.0mm in diameter. For each indenter, the load per contact area of the indenter with the platen equaled 150N per 200 mm2 described in ISO No. 9917. The effects of working time (30, 60, and 90 s) and load (2.86, 6.78, 10.7, and 14.7N) on the fluidity and T(h) were examined using the indenter with a diameter of 5.0mm. The duration of loading was 10 min. The fluidity was defined as the reciprocal of the apparent viscosity and was calculated using Stefan's equation. RESULTS: The T(h) obtained using this apparatus agreed with the film thickness obtained using the test described in ISO No. 9917. For Durelon (DU), T(h) increased 1.58 times and fluidity decreased 0.26 times as the working time increased from 30 to 90 s; T(h) decreased 0.56 times and fluidity increased 1.28 times as loading increased from 2.86 to 14.7N. For Ketac cement radiopaque (KE), Panavia fluoro cement (PA), Scotchbond resin cement (SC), and Vitremer luting cement (VI), although the fluidity and T(h) were not influenced much by duration (30-90 s), T(h) decreased 0.79, 0.74, 0.95, and 0.78 times for KE, PA, SC, and VI, respectively, and fluidity decreased 0.68, 0.51, 0.30, and 0.36 times, respectively, as loading increased from 2.86 to 14.7N. SIGNIFICANCE: This apparatus was proven effective in elucidating the flow properties of luting cement.

Composite Resins↗
PubMed2005

Effect of thermocycling on bond strength of luting cements to zirconia ceramic.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength of different cements to densely sintered zirconia ceramic after aging by thermocycling. METHODS: The following luting cements for bonding ZrO2-TZP (tetragonal zirconia polycrystals) were used in this study: Ketac-Cem, Nexus, Rely X Unicem, Superbond C&B, Panavia F, and Panavia 21. Groups of 30 test specimens were prepared by bonding stainless steel cylinders tribochemically silica-coated with the Rocatec-system to sandblasted ZrO2-TZP ceramic disks (cercon smart ceramics). Prior to testing all bonded specimens were stored in distilled water (37 degrees C) for 48 h and half of them (n=15) were additionally aged by thermocycling (10,000 times). RESULTS: None of the fractures occurred at the interface of the metallic rods. The assemblies failed either at the interface between the ceramic surface and the cements or within the cements. Thermocycling affected the bond strength of all luting cements studied except for both Panavia materials and Rely X Unicem. SIGNIFICANCE: Within the limits of this in vitro study the results showed that-after thermocycling-bond strengths for Ketac-Cem and Nexus were quite low. Nexus in combination with tribochemical silica-coating of ceramic surface produced a higher bond strength. The four adhesive resin cements (Rely X Unicem, Superbond C&B, Panavia F, and Panavia 21) gave superior results. The strongest bond to zirconia was obtained with Panavia 21.

Boron Compounds↗
PubMed1995

In vivo marginal adaptation of cast crowns luted with different cements.

Large marginal crown discrepancies are deleterious. Although previous studies have examined casting seating in vitro, few have evaluated the effects of different luting cements on in vivo seating. Hence this in vivo study compared marginal discrepancies created by different cements on cast crowns. Tooth preparations were completed according to acceptable procedures on previously intact human molars that were severely periodontally compromised and scheduled for extraction. Castings were made by conventional techniques. The castings were randomly assigned to the following luting agents: zinc phosphate cement, resin-modified glass-ionomer cement, and the same resin-modified glass-ionomer cement with a dentinal bonding agent. After 6 months the teeth were carefully extracted, embedded, and sectioned, and vertical and horizontal discrepancies were measured. Analysis of variance revealed that all cements resulted in similar discrepancies. Vertical discrepancies were considerably greater than horizontal discrepancies, and the distributions of marginal discrepancies were skewed towards upper ranges.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed1998

Microleakage along apical root fillings and cemented posts.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Coronal leakage of endodontically treated teeth has been found to result in a high failure rate. PURPOSE: This study tested leakage along apical root fillings remaining after post space preparation and cemented posts in root canals. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 120 human roots were used in the study and divided into six groups, 20 roots for each group. By using a modified fluid transport model, leakage (in microL/hr) along ParaPost dowels that were cemented in the coronal 7 mm of root canals with Fuji Duet, Ketac Cem, Panavia EX, or zinc phosphate cements was compared with that along the coronal 7 mm of conventional root canal fillings. Leakage along the apical 4 mm of root filling remaining after post space preparation was compared with that along the 11 mm root filling before post space preparation. RESULTS: More leakage was recorded along the apical 4 mm of root filling than along the 11 mm of original root filling (p = 0.0325). ParaPost dowels cemented with any test cement did not produce more leakage than the 7 mm coronal root filling (p = 0.2145). CONCLUSIONS: The apical 4 mm of root canal filling remaining after post space preparation leaks statistically significantly more than the original full-length root canal filling. The leakage created by removal of the coronal part of root canal filling during post space preparation may be compensated by the cemented posts.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed2001

A simple acid erosion test for dental water-based cements.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate a new erosion test for dental cements that has been developed as an alternative to the impinging jet erosion test used in current standards. The method was evaluated by measuring and comparing the extent of the erosion of three different types of dental cement. METHODS: The erosion of three different types of cement; zinc phosphate, polycarboxylate and glass ionomer, were evaluated by measuring the depth loss of the cement placed in a cylindrical cavity in PMMA sheet after immersed in lactic acid solution (pH 2.74) or lactic acid/sodium lactate buffer solution (pH 2.74). The depth loss was measured by a dial gauge. Changes in the pH of the eroding solutions were monitored. Identical specimens were immersed in distilled water and the degree of hygroscopic expansion was also confirmed. RESULTS: Depth loss and pH increased with increasing immersion period. The depth losses of all cements were considerably more in the buffer solution than in the acid solution. A difference in the eroded depth for three different kinds of cements clearly emerged. The depth loss for polycarboxylate was more than that for zinc phosphate, which was more than that for glass ionomer. Although hygroscopic expansion was observed for glass ionomer, the value after 24h immersion was negligible compared with the eroded depth. SIGNIFICANCE: The results appear to correlate with those obtained using a jet erosion test and with published data on clinical performance. This suggests that the simpler test described here is suitable for standardization purposes.

Buffers↗
PubMed1996

Short-term contamination of luting cements by water and saliva.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of water, artificial saliva and natural saliva on the hardening process of three dental luting cements. METHODS: Cement samples, 1 mm thick and 5 mm in diameter, were subjected to various storage conditions in an oven maintained at 37 degrees C. Some samples were aged in 100% humidity or water for up to 1 wk. The other samples were covered with water, artificial saliva or natural saliva at various times after mixing. The Knoop hardness values of the cement surfaces were measured. Differences between groups were evaluated with an ANOVA followed by a Tukey multiple comparison at the 5% level of significance. The hardness ratio of the contaminated samples was calculated using the 30 min mean KHN of the samples aged in 100% humidity as the divisor. RESULTS: The glass ionomer samples were significantly harder (48.3 +/- 3.8) than the zinc phosphate (38.9 +/- 7.5) or composite cements (35.4 +/- 10.2) after 1 wk in 100% humidity storage condition. When immersed in water, the hardness of both the glass ionomer and the zinc phosphate decreased to almost half that of the specimens stored in 100% humidity (26.2 +/- 2.7 and 16.9 +/- 2.5, respectively). Contamination decreased the hardness of zinc phosphate and glass ionomer (hardness ratio, water contamination at 5 min: 0.39 +/- 0.10 and 0.52 +/- 0.12, respectively) but had very little effect on the composite. Overall, water had a greater softening effect than artificial or natural saliva on the cements. SIGNIFICANCE: In light of these results, glass ionomer cement should be protected from water and saliva for the first 15 min after mixing.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed1998

Cytotoxic effects of dental composites, adhesive substances, compomers and cements.

OBJECTIVES: Although research interest in biocompatibility of dental materials has been increasing, findings are frequently controversial and non-harmonized experimental approaches often lead to the production of contradictory results. The aim of this study was to compare the cytotoxic effects of six different light-cured dental composites, one compomer, one advanced glass-ionomer, two glass-ionomer cements, two zinc phosphate cements, one calcium hydroxide liner, one composite cement and one carboxylate cement with the same standardized cell-culture system. Two composites, one compomer and one advanced glass-ionomer were also tested in combination with the appropriate bonding substances and surface primers. METHODS: Specimens were added to the cultures immediately after production or after preincubation for 1, 2 or 7 days or 6 weeks under cell-culture conditions. Specimens were incubated with L-929 fibroblasts for 72 h and cell numbers determined by flow cytometry. RESULTS: All freshly prepared composite materials were cytotoxic. These effects diminished with increased preincubation times and were not significant after 7 days. Combinations of composites and bonding substances were still cytotoxic after preincubation for 7 days, but not after 6 weeks. Combinations of compomers and bonding substances demonstrated stronger toxicity than composites, although these effects were reduced earlier during preincubation. Glass-ionomer and phosphate cements showed similar effects to the composites with the exception of carboxylate cement, which demonstrated severe and persistent effects even after 6 weeks' preincubation. Together, our data provide evidence that all dental materials tested are cytotoxic immediately after production and that these effects are reduced after different preincubation periods in most cases. SIGNIFICANCE: Tested with a standardized cell-culture system, differences in toxicological potency between various commonly used dental materials were observed. Cytotoxicity data from standardized protocols should form the basis of screening the cytotoxic effects of new materials.

Adhesives↗
PubMed2001

The use of reinforced composite resin cement as compensation for reduced post length.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Cements that yield high retentive values are believed to allow use of shorter posts. PURPOSE: This study investigated the use of reinforced composite resin cement as compensation for reduced dowel length. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The retention values of stainless steel posts (parallel-sided ParaPost and tapered Dentatus in 5-, 8-, and 10-mm lengths) luted with Flexi-Flow titanium-reinforced composite resin and zinc phosphate cements were evaluated. Single-rooted extracted human teeth with crowns (n = 120), removed at the cementoenamel junction, were randomly divided into 4 groups of 30 samples each. Different post lengths were luted with either Flexi-Flow or zinc phosphate. Each sample was placed into a specialized jig and on a tensile testing machine with a crosshead speed of 2 mm/min, applied until failure. The effect of different posts and cements on the force required to dislodge the dowels was evaluated with multiple analyses of variance (ANOVA). One-way ANOVA with Scheffé contrast was applied to determine the effect of different post lengths on the retentive failure of posts luted with the 2 agents. RESULTS: Flexi-Flow reinforced composite resin cement significantly increased retention of ParaPost and Dentatus dowels (P<.001) compared with zinc phosphate. One-way ANOVA revealed no statistically significant difference (P>.05) between mean retention of both dowels luted with Flexi-Flow for all posts length used (5 mm = 8 mm = 10 mm). Mean retention values of the groups luted with zinc phosphate showed a statistically significant difference (P<.001) for the different post lengths (10 > 8 > 5 mm). Parallel-sided ParaPost dowels demonstrated a higher mean retention than tapered Dentatus dowels (P<.001). CONCLUSION: In this study, Flexi-Flow reinforced composite resin cement compensated for the reduced length of shorter parallel-sided ParaPost and tapered Dentatus dowels.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed2002

Retentive properties of five different luting cements on base and noble metal copings.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The retention of indirectly fabricated restorations can be compromised by short or over-tapered tooth preparations. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the retentive properties of 5 different luting cements on base and noble metal copings to short and over-tapered preparations. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eighty extracted mandibular premolars were prepared to receive full cast copings with a flat occlusal surface, 33 degrees taper, and 3-mm axial length. Half of the standardized metal copings were cast in an AuAgPd alloy, whereas the other half were cast in an NiCr alloy. Cementation was performed with 5 different luting cements through use of 5 kg of pressure in 90% relative humidity. Specimens were stored in distilled water at 37 degrees C for 24 hours and thermocycled between 5 degrees C and 55 degrees C for 5000 cycles, with a dwell time of 30 seconds. After thermocycling, vertical tensile force was applied in a Zwick universal testing machine with a constant speed of 1 mm/min until separation was noted. A 2-factor analysis of variance was used to analyze the data, with a significance level of alpha =.05. RESULTS: Mean dislodgement forces for AuAgPd crowns and NiCr crowns were 120.88 N and 143.09 N, respectively, for zinc phosphate cement; 135.45 N and 150.38 N for Principle; 145.88 N and 220.71 N for Meron; 276.85 N and 225.61 N for Avanto; and 300.92 N and 381.02 N for Fuji Plus. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, Fuji Plus and Avanto showed significantly higher retentive strengths for AuAgPd copings in comparison to the other cements tested (P <.05). The retentive strength of Fuji Plus was significantly higher than those of the other cements tested with NiCr copings (P <.05).

Adhesiveness↗
PubMed2003

Flexural strength and modulus of a novel ceramic restorative cement intended for posterior restorations as determined by a three-point bending test.

The aim of this study was to compare a new restorative cement intended for posterior restorations, Doxadent, with other types of tooth-colored materials as regards flexural strength and flexural modulus. The new restorative material consists mainly of calcium aluminate. Four hybrid resin composites, one polyacid-modified resin composite, one resin-modified glass ionomer cement, one conventional glass ionomer cement, one zinc phosphate cement, and an experimental version as well as the marketed version of Doxadent were investigated. Flexural strength and flexural modulus were tested according to ISO standard 4049 and determined after 1 d, 1 week, and 2 weeks. Together with the zinc phosphate cement, Doxadent had the lowest flexural strengths (13-22 MPa). The strongest materials were the resin composites and the polyacid-modified resin composite (83-136 MPa). The highest flexural modulus was found for Doxadent (17-19 GPa). The flexural strength of Doxadent decreased significantly from 1 week to 2 weeks, while flexural modulus remained unchanged. The other materials reacted in different ways to prolonged water storage. It can be concluded that the restorative cement Doxadent had significantly lower flexural strength and significantly higher flexural modulus than today's materials used for direct posterior restorations.

Aluminum Compounds↗
PubMed2005

Retentive strength of metal copings on prefabricated abutments with five different cements.

BACKGROUND: Despite their wide use in implant dentistry, there is insufficient information concerning the retentive strength of cement-retained superstructures. PURPOSE: This study compared the retentive strength of metal copings on prefabricated abutments with five different luting cements. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight prefabricated abutments were placed on titanium screw implants torqued to 35 Ncm. Metal copings were cast with Au-Pt-Pd alloy (DeguDent Universal, Degussa, Hanau, Germany) using burnt-out plastic copings. Cements used were zinc oxide-eugenol-free temporary (ZO), zinc phosphate (ZP), glass ionomer (GI), resin-reinforced glass ionomer (RG), and composite resin (CR) cements. Retentive strength was measured with a universal testing machine. The means of each group were compared by one-way analysis of variance and Tukey-Kramer multiple-comparison intervals at a significance level of p < .05. RESULTS: The mean +/- SD retentive strength of the cements in Newtons was ZO 56 +/- 12 (Tukey group C), ZP 158 +/- 79 (Tukey group B), GI 132 +/- 29 (Tukey group B), RG 477 +/- 52 (Tukey group A), and CR 478 +/- 50 (Tukey group A). CONCLUSION: The retentive strength of metal copings on implant abutments is somewhat different from those of conventional cemented restorations on natural teeth. These differences may be influenced by differences in surface roughness and the height of the abutment.

Composite Resins↗
PubMed1978

Stress/strain behavior of some dental luting cements.

The compressive strength, modulus of elasticity and the plastic strain at fracture have been studied for several dental luting cements. Stress/strain diagrams of cylindrical specimens using two different crosshead speeds (2 mm/min and 0.1 mm/min) at 23 degrees and 37 degrees C showed that large differences existed between various luting cements. A zinc phosphate cement exihibited high strength, high modulus of elasticity and a small plastic strain at fracture. A resin cement also had high strength, but elastic and plastic strains were high. A polycarboxylate and an EBA-cement both showed low values of strength and modulus of elasticity combined with a high degree of plastic deformation at fracture. Testing with low strain rate at 37 degrees C accentuated the differences between these two materials and the zinc phosphate cement.

Composite Resins↗
PubMed1998

[Periodontal aspects of cementation: materials, technics and their biologic reactions].

Cementation of crowns and bridges has an influence on the health of marginal periodontal structures. Ideally, the marginal discrepancy should be less than 50 microns which has been considered clinically acceptable. With discrepancies larger than 80 microns, the bleeding tendency and sulcus fluid flow rate increased. A shoulder-bevel preparation results in the smallest marginal discrepancy. Cytotoxicity of cements has been studied in cultures of gingival cells and fibroblasts. Composite has always a more pronounced cytotoxicity as compared to glass-ionomers and zinc phosphate cements. However, large differences exist in cytotoxicity between materials of the same group. Erosion of the cement leads to leakage of toxic materials and the formation of niches colonised by oral plaque bacteria. A number of clinical recommendations are made to minimize the effect of cements and cementation on the periodontal structures.

Cells, Cultured↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Bonding to densely sintered alumina surfaces: effect of sandblasting and silica coating on shear bond strength of luting cements.

PURPOSE: An important determinant of the clinical success of ceramic restorations is the bond strength of the luting agent to the seating surface and the prepared tooth structures. Manufacturers of ceramic systems frequently specify both the luting agent and preluting treatment of the seating surface of the crown. Procera AllCeram is an all-ceramic crown comprising a porcelain-veneered coping of densely sintered, high-purity aluminum oxide. This study evaluated the shear bond strength of 4 luting agents: zinc-phosphate, glass-ionomer, resin-modified glass-ionomer, and resin cement (dual cured) to Procera aluminum oxide coping material. The luting agents were subjected to different surface treatments: untreated, sandblasted, or silica coated by the Rocatec system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cylindric and cubic specimens of the coping material were luted together, and the shear force necessary to separate the cylinder from the cube was measured with a universal testing machine. The surfaces of the specimens were also analyzed. RESULTS: No significant differences were recorded for the shear bond strengths of the luting agents to the untreated aluminum oxide. Glass-ionomer and the resin-modified glass-ionomer cements had the highest values (4.2 +/- 2.5 MPa and 4.3 +/- 1.9 MPa, respectively), and the lowest were 3.3 +/- 2.3 MPa for the resin cement and 3.2 +/- 1.0 MPa for the zinc-phosphate cement. Similar results were recorded for the sandblasted aluminum oxide surfaces, except with the glass-ionomer, which was significantly higher (12.9 +/- 2.4 MPa). For all 4 luting agents, the highest shear bond strength values were recorded for the silica-coated specimens; the highest was for the resin cement, at 36.2 +/- 7.8 MPa. CONCLUSION: The bond strengths between resin cement and aluminum oxide specimens treated by the Rocatec system were significantly higher than those of the other materials and surface treatments evaluated.

Aluminum Oxide↗