Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “REPRESSION”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,297 records · Page 72Linked to original sources

Protein p4 represses phage phi 29 A2c promoter by interacting with the alpha subunit of Bacillus subtilis RNA polymerase.

Regulatory protein p4 from Bacillus subtilis phage phi 29 represses the strong viral A2c promoter (PA2c) by preventing promoter clearance; it allows RNA polymerase to bind to the promoter and form an initiated complex, but the elongation step is not reached. Protein p4 binds at PA2c immediately upstream from RNA polymerase; repression involves a contact between both proteins that holds the RNA polymerase at the promoter. This contact is held mainly through p4 residue Arg120, which is also required for activation of the phi 29 late A3 promoter. We have investigated which region of RNA polymerase contacts protein p4 at PA2c. Promoter repression was impaired when a reconstituted RNA polymerase lacking the 15 C-terminal residues of the alpha subunit C-terminal domain was used; this polymerase was otherwise competent for transcription. Binding cooperativity assays indicated that protein p4 cannot interact with this mutant RNA polymerase at PA2c. Protein p4 could form a complex at PA2c with purified wild-type alpha subunit, but not with a deletion mutant lacking the 15 C-terminal residues. Our results indicate that protein p4 represses PA2c by interacting with the C-terminal domain of the alpha subunit of RNA polymerase. Therefore, this domain of the alpha subunit can receive regulatory signals not only from transcriptional activators, but from repressors also.

Bacillus Phages↗

RB and hbrm cooperate to repress the activation functions of E2F1.

Forced expression of the retinoblastoma (RB) gene product inhibits the proliferation of cells in culture. A major target of the RB protein is the S-phase-inducing transcription factor E2F1. RB binds directly to the activation domain of E2F1 and silences it, thereby preventing cells from entering S phase. To induce complete G1 arrest, RB requires the presence of the hbrm/BRG-1 proteins, which are components of the coactivator SWI/SNF complex. This cooperation is mediated through a physical interaction between RB and hbrm/BRG-1. We show here that in transfected cells RB can contact both E2F1 and hbrm at the same time, thereby targeting hbrm to E2F1. E2F1 and hbrm are indeed found within the same complex in vivo. Furthermore, RB and hbrm cooperate to repress E2F1 activity in transient transfection assays. The ability of hbrm to cooperate with RB to repress E2F1 is dependent upon several distinct domains of hbrm, including the RB binding domain and the NTP binding site. However, the bromodomain seems dispensable for this activity. Taken together, our results point out an unexpected role of corepressor for the hbrm protein. The ability of hbrm and RB to cooperate in repressing E2F1 activity could be an underlying mechanism for the observed cooperation between hbrm and RB to induce G1 arrest. Finally, we demonstrate that the domain of hbrm that binds RB has transcriptional activation potential which RB can repress. This suggest that RB not only targets hbrm but also regulates its activity.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Myc represses transcription of the growth arrest gene gas1.

Cell proliferation is regulated by the induction of growth promoting genes and the suppression of growth inhibitory genes. Malignant growth can result from the altered balance of expression of these genes in favor of cell proliferation. Induction of the transcription factor, c-Myc, promotes cell proliferation and transformation by activating growth promoting genes, including the ODC and cdc25A genes. We show that c-Myc transcriptionally represses the expression of a growth arrest gene, gas1. A conserved Myc structure, Myc box 2, is required for repression of gas1, and for Myc induction of proliferation and transformation, but not for activation of ODC. Activation of a Myc-estrogen receptor fusion protein by 4-hydroxytamoxifen was sufficient to repress gas1 gene transcription. These findings suggest that transcriptional repression of growth arrest genes, including gas1, is one step in promotion of cell growth by Myc.

3T3 Cells↗

Transcriptional repression by the human homeobox protein EVX1 in transfected mammalian cells.

The human homeobox protein EVX1 (EVX1) is thought to play an important role during embryogenesis. In this study, the effect of EVX1 on gene transcription has been investigated in transfected mammalian cells. EVX1 expression represses transcription of a reporter gene directed by either cell-specific or viral promoter/enhancer sequences in a variety of mammalian cell lines and in a concentration-dependent manner. Transcriptional repression is independent of the presence of DNA-binding sites for EVX1 in all the promoters we tested. Furthermore, repression by EVX1 is evident also using a TATA-less minimal promoter in the reporter construct. A carboxyl-terminal proline/alanine-rich region of EVX1 seems to be responsible for the transcriptional repression activity, as suggested by transfection of EVX1 mutants. We speculate that the repressor function of EVX1 contributes to its proposed role in embryogenesis.

Animals↗

Mapping of the transcriptional repression domain of the lymphoid-specific transcription factor oct-2A.

The lymphoid-specific transcription factor Oct-2a is implicated in B cell-specific transcriptional activity via the octamer motif. Structure/function analysis of various Oct-2a effector regions in the context of the GAL4 DNA-binding domain revealed that Oct-2a contains two functionally different activation domains at the N and the C termini. The transcriptional activity of both domains is strongly potentiated by interactions with distinct B cell-specific coactivators. Recently, we have identified a repression domain located within the N terminus of Oct-2a (amino acids 2-99). When this domain was transferred to a potent activator, transcription was strongly inhibited. In this study we present a deletion analysis of the N-terminal region of Oct-2a to determine the minimal repression domain. We identified a stretch of 23 amino acids, rich in serine and threonine residues, which was responsible for most of the repression activity. We show that repression is strongly dependent on the type of enhancer present in the reporter plasmid as well as on the cell line tested. The possibility that Oct-2a can act as an activator and/or a repressor may have important consequences for the function of Oct-2a in B cell differentiation and other developmental processes.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Repression of transcriptional enhancer factor-1 and activator protein-1-dependent enhancer activity by vascular actin single-stranded DNA binding factor 2.

Transcriptional repression of the murine vascular smooth muscle alpha-actin gene in fibroblasts results from the interaction of two sequence-specific single-stranded DNA binding activities (VACssBF1 and VACssBF2) with opposite strands of an essential transcriptional enhancer factor-1 (TEF-1) element (Sun, S., Stoflet, E. S., Cogan, J. G., Strauch, A. R., and Getz, M. J. (1995) Mol. Cell. Biol. 15, 2429-2436). Here, we identify a sequence element located within a protein-coding exon of the gene that bears structural similarity with the TEF-1 enhancer. This includes a 30-base pair region of purine-pyrimidine asymmetry encompassing a perfect 6-base pair GGAATG TEF-1 recognition motif. Unlike the enhancer, however, the exon sequence exhibits no TEF-1 binding activity nor does the pyrimidine-rich strand bind VACssBF1. However, VACssBF2 interacts equally well with the purine-rich strand of both the enhancer and the exon sequence. To test the ability of VACssBF2 to independently repress transcription, the exon sequence was placed upstream of a deletionally activated promoter containing an intact TEF-1 binding site. The exon sequence repressed promoter activity, whereas a mutant deficient in VACssBF2 binding did not. Moreover, VACssBF2 similarly repressed activator protein-1-dependent transcription of a heterologous tissue factor promoter. These results suggest that VACssBF2 possesses an intrinsic ability to disrupt enhancer function independently of the enhancer-binding proteins involved.

3T3 Cells↗

A complex composed of tup1 and ssn6 represses transcription in vitro.

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Tup1 protein is a member of a family of WD repeat containing proteins that are involved in repression of transcription. Tup1, along with the Ssn6 protein, represses a wide variety of genes in yeast including cell type-specific and glucose-repressed genes. Tup1 and Ssn6 are recruited to these specific gene sets by interaction with sequence-specific DNA binding proteins. In this work, a protein complex containing Ssn6 and Tup1 was purified to determine its composition. The size of the complex is estimated to be 440 kDa. Tup1 and Ssn6, which are both phosphoproteins, are the only proteins present in stoichiometric amounts in the complex. We also demonstrate that this purified complex represses transcription in an in vitro assay.

Cell-Free System↗

RNA polymerase III transcription repressed by Rb through its interactions with TFIIIB and TFIIIC2.

The retinoblastoma susceptibility gene product (Rb) generally represses RNA polymerase III (Pol III)-directed transcription. This implies that Rb interacts with essential transcription factors. Mutations in either the A or B subdomains in the Rb pocket interfere with Rb-mediated repression of Pol III-directed transcription, which indicates that both subdomains are directly involved in this activity. Addition of either purified TFIIIB or purified TFIIIC2 partially relieves Rb-mediated repression and restores activity to nuclear extracts that had been depleted of essential factors by binding to Rb. Pull down and coimmunoprecipitation experiments as well as functional assays indicate that Rb interacts with both TFIIIB and TFIIIC2 and that the A subdomain is primarily required for binding TFIIIB and the B subdomain for binding TFIIIC2. While Rb interacts with both factors, the A subdomain is more important than the B subdomain in directing Rb-mediated repression, and TFIIIB is the principal target of that activity.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Two distinct factor-binding DNA elements in cardiac myosin light chain 2 gene are essential for repression of its expression in skeletal muscle. Isolation of a cDNA clone for repressor protein Nished.

The expression of the cardiac myosin light chain 2 (MLC2) gene is repressed in skeletal muscle as a result of the negative regulation of its transcription. Two regulatory elements, the cardiac specific sequence (CSS) located upstream (-360 base pairs) and a downstream negative modulatory sequence (NMS), which function in concert with each other, are required for repression of the MLC2 promoter activity in skeletal muscle. Individually, CSS and NMS have no effect. Transient transfection analysis with recombinant plasmids indicated that CSS- and NMS-mediated repression of transcription is position- and orientation-dependent and is transferable to heterologous promoters. A minimal conserved motif, GAAG/CTTC, present in both CSS and NMS, is responsible for repression as the mutation in the core CTTC sequence alone was sufficient to abrogate its repressor activity. The DNA binding assay by gel mobility shift analysis revealed that one of the two complexes, CSSBP2, is significantly enriched in embryonic skeletal muscle relative to cardiac muscle. In extracts from adult skeletal muscle, where the cardiac MLC2 expression is suppressed, both complexes, CSSBP1 and CSSBP2, were present, whereas the cardiac muscle extracts contained CSSBP1 alone, suggesting that the protein(s) in the CSSBP2 complex accounts for the negative regulation of cardiac MLC2 in skeletal muscle. A partial cDNA clone (Nished) specific for the candidate repressor factor was isolated by expression screening of the skeletal muscle cDNA library by multimerized CSS-DNA as probe. The recombinant Nished protein binds to the CSS-DNA, but not to DeltaCSS-DNA where the core CTTC sequence was mutated. The amino acid sequence of Nished showed a significant structural similarity to the sequence of transcription factor "runt," a known repressor of gap and pair-rule gene expression in Drosophila.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Transcriptional repression mediated by the PR domain zinc finger gene RIZ.

The RIZ (G3B or MTB-Zf) zinc finger gene is structurally related to the myeloid leukemia gene, MDS1-EVI1, and the transcription repressor/differentiation factor, PRDI-BF1/BLIMP1, through a conserved amino-terminal motif, the PR domain. Similar to MDS1-EVI1, RIZ gene normally produces two protein products that differ by the PR domain. The smaller protein RIZ2 lacks the PR domain of RIZ1 but is otherwise identical to RIZ1. Here we show that RIZ proteins bind to GC-rich or Sp-1-binding elements and repress transcription. Both RIZ1 and RIZ2 repressed the herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase (HSV-TK) promoter, one of the best characterized eukaryotic promoters. Recombinant RIZ1 proteins were able to bind to HSV-TK promoter. This binding was mediated by the GC-rich Sp-1 elements of the promoter and the first three zinc finger motifs of RIZ1. RIZ also encodes a repressor domain that was mapped to the central region of the protein. Fusion of this region to the GAL4 DNA-binding domain generated GAL4 site-dependent transcriptional repressors. We also show that RIZ1 protein can efficiently repress the simian virus 40 (SV40) early promoter, which primarily consists of Sp-1 sites; RIZ2, however, only weakly repressed this promoter, suggesting a role for PR in modulating RIZ protein function. The data have implications for a role of RIZ proteins in the regulation of cellular gene promoters, many of which are characterized by GC-rich elements.

3T3 Cells↗

H1-mediated repression of transcription factor binding to a stably positioned nucleosome.

Previously, we reported that histone H1 binding to nucleosome cores results in the repression of binding of the basic helix-loop-helix upstream stimulatory factor (USF) (Juan, L.-J., Utley, R. T., Adams, C. C., Vettese-Dadey, M., and Workman, J. L. (1994) EMBO J. 13, 6031-6040). We have tested whether this inhibition resulted from H1-mediated changes in nucleosome positioning (Ura, K., Hayes, J. J., and Wolffe, A. P. (1995) EMBO J. 14, 3752-3765) forcing the USF recognition sequence into less accessible locations within the nucleosome. Nucleosome boundaries were determined by assays combining micrococcal nuclease and restriction endonuclease digestion. A unique pair of boundaries were observed, indicating a single nucleosome translational position. This nucleosome position did not change on H1 or USF binding. Thus, H1 repression of USF binding was independent of nucleosome mobility, indicating an alternative mechanism of H1 repression. H1 repressed USF binding at a site 35 base pairs into the nucleosome core more effectively than at a site near the "linker" DNA, suggesting that inhibition by H1 was not simply due to steric occlusion. Instead, these data are consistent with a model by which H1 binding reduces transient dynamic exposure of the DNA from the histone octamer surface (Polach, K. L., and Widom, J. (1995) J. Mol. Biol. 254, 130-149).

Binding Sites↗

Sp3 is a bifunctional transcription regulator with modular independent activation and repression domains.

Sp3 is a member of the Sp family of transcription factors and binds to DNA with affinity and specificity comparable to that of Sp1. We demonstrate that Sp3 is a bifunctional transcription factor that can both activate and repress transcription. Gene fusion experiments in mammalian cells demonstrate that the Sp3 activation potential is distributed over an extensive glutamine-rich N-terminal region, whereas the repressor activity has been mapped in a 72-amino acid region located at the 5' of the zinc finger DNA-binding domain. We demonstrated that the repression activity is strictly dependent on the context of the DNA-binding sites bound by Sp3. We found that Sp3 represses transcription of promoters bearing multiple GAL4 DNA-binding sites, whereas it activates isogenic reporters containing a single GAL4-binding site. Transfection experiments in Drosophila cells that lack endogenous Sp activity demonstrated that Sp3 does not possess an active repression domain that can function in insect cells, rather it is a weak transcriptional activator of the c-myc promoter. Our results strongly suggest that Sp3 is a dual-function regulator whose activity is dependent upon both the promoter and the cellular context.

Animals↗

T-cell proto-oncogene rhombotin-2 is a complex transcription regulator containing multiple activation and repression domains.

The LIM domain protein rhombotin-2 (RBTN-2/TTG-2/LMO2) is involved in many processes, including leukemogenesis and erythropoiesis. It is thought that the principle role of RBTN-2 in these processes is to regulate transcription. To examine the potential for RBTN-2 to modulate transcription, we constructed RBTN-2/GAL4 DNA-binding domain fusion proteins and measured their ability to activate transcription of a reporter gene construct. From these studies we identified a transcription activation domain within the NH2 terminus of RBTN-2. This activation domain was further localized within a proline-rich 19-amino acid region. A second activation domain of 11 amino acids was also identified. This domain was located within the COOH terminus of RBTN-2, and functioned in mammalian cells but not in yeast. Furthermore, the two LIM domains of RBTN-2 were shown to function as transcription repression domains. Each individual LIM domain acted as an independent transcription repression domain on a heterologous activation domain. However, in context of full-length RBTN-2, the LIM domains selectively repressed the NH2-terminal activation domain, but had no effect on the COOH-terminal domain. Overall, these results demonstrate that the T-cell oncogene RBTN-2 is a complex transcription factor possessing multiple transcription regulatory modules, including two activation domains and two repression domains.

Animals↗

Interference between progesterone and dioxin signal transduction pathways. Different mechanisms are involved in repression by the progesterone receptor A and B isoforms.

Interactions between transcription factors are an important means of regulating gene transcription, leading to modifications in the pattern of gene expression and cell fate. In this study, we report that the progesterone receptor (PR) can strongly interfere with transactivation mediated by the arylhydrocarbon receptor (AhR) in T47D breast cancer cells. This interference was not only demonstrated by induction of a transfected dioxin-responsive reporter plasmid but also on the AhR-mediated up-regulation of the endogenous cytochrome P450-1A1 activity. The interference was not mutual, as 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD), the most potent activator of the AhR, did not inhibit progestin-induced promoter activity. When the isoforms of the human PR, hPR-A and hPR-B, were expressed separately in HepG-2 hepatocarcinoma cells, both negatively interfered with the AhR signaling, indicating that the effect is not restricted to T47D cells. In addition, results obtained from studies with both antiprogestins and mutant receptors indicate differences in the underlying molecular mechanisms of repression for both PR isoforms. The suppression by hPR-A does not require additional gene expression or a full transcriptional competent conformation of the receptor. For the repressive effects of hPR-B, however, additional gene expression seems to be involved, as only the agonist-bound, wild-type hPR-B could clearly repress the TCDD-induced response. In conclusion, these studies highlight different mechanisms of repression for the progesterone receptor isoforms on the AhR-mediated trans-activation and underscore the importance of interactions between transcription factors of different families in the regulation of gene transcription.

Breast Neoplasms↗

Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor gene transcription is directly repressed by the vitamin D3 receptor. Implications for allosteric influences on nuclear receptor structure and function by a DNA element.

The primary function of activated T lymphocytes is to produce various cytokines necessary to elicit an immune response; these cytokines include interleukin-2 (IL-2), interleukin-4, and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GMCSF). Steroid hormones and vitamin A and D3 metabolites act to repress the expression of cytokines. 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 (1,25-(OH)2D3) down-modulates activated IL-2 expression at the level transcription, through direct antagonism of the transactivating complex NFAT-1/AP-1 by the vitamin D3 receptor (VDR). We report here that GMCSF transcription in Jurkat T cells is also directly repressed by 1, 25-(OH)2D3 and VDR. Among four NFAT/AP-1 elements in the GMCSF enhancer, we have focused on one such element that when multimerized, is sufficient in mediating both activation by NFAT-1 and AP-1 and repression in response to 1,25-(OH)2D3. Although this element does not contain any recognizable vitamin D response elements (VDREs), high affinity DNA binding by recombinant VDR is observed. In contrast to VDR interactions with positive VDREs, this binding is independent of VDR's heterodimeric partner, the retinoid X receptor. Moreover, VDR appears to bind the GMCSF element as an apparent monomer in vitro. Protease digestion patterns of bound VDR, and receptor mutations affecting DNA binding and dimerization, demonstrate that the receptor binds to the negative site in a distinct conformation relative to a positive VDRE, suggesting that the DNA element itself acts as an allosteric effector of VDR function. This altered conformation may account for VDR's action as a repressing rather than activating factor at this locus.

Allosteric Regulation↗

Glucocorticoids repress transcription from a negative glucocorticoid response element recognized by two homeodomain-containing proteins, Pbx and Oct-1.

Several studies have established that the prolactin (PRL) gene is expressed not only in lactotrophs and somatotrophs of the anterior pituitary but, albeit to a lesser extent, in non-pituitary cells like human thymocytes, decidualized endometrium, mammary glands during lactation, and some human non-pituitary cell lines. Despite the requirement in the pituitary for the pituitary-specific transcription factor Pit-1/GHF-1 for PRL expression, the expression in non-pituitary cells occurs in the absence of Pit-1/GHF-1 and can be repressed by glucocorticoids. This prompted us to investigate the transcription factors in non-pituitary cells which are involved in controlling expression and glucocorticoid repression of a previously characterized negative glucocorticoid response element from the bovine prolactin gene (PRL3 nGRE). Here we have demonstrated that non-pituitary cells (COS-7 and mouse hepatoma Hepa1c1c7 cells) conferred increased expression via the PRL3 nGRE mainly because of the binding of the ubiquitously expressed POU-homeodomain-containing octamer transcription factor-1 (Oct-1) to an AT-rich sequence present in the PRL3 sequence. However, full transcriptional activity required the binding of a second ubiquitously expressed homeodomain-containing protein, Pbx, previously shown to bind cooperatively with several homeotic selector proteins. The Pbx binding site in the PRL3 nGRE, located just upstream of the Oct-1 binding site, showed a strong sequence similarity with known Pbx binding sites and bound Pbx with an affinity similar to that of other established Pbx target sequences. Interestingly, both Oct-1 and Pbx binding to the PRL3 nGRE were found to be required for glucocorticoid repression. Addition of in vitro translated glucocorticoid receptor DNA binding domain to the nuclear extract prevented Oct-1 and Pbx from binding to the PRL element. The involvement of the homeobox protein Pbx in glucocorticoid repression via an nGRE identifies a new role for this protein.

Animals↗

An upstream regulator of the glycoprotein hormone alpha-subunit gene mediates pituitary cell type activation and repression by different mechanisms.

Targeting of alpha-subunit gene expression within the pituitary is influenced by an upstream regulatory region that directs high level expression to thyrotropes and gonadotropes of transgenic mice. The same region also enhanced the activity of the proximal promoter in transfections of pituitary-derived alpha-TSH and alpha-T3 cells. We have localized the activating sequences to a 125-bp region that contains consensus sites for factors that also play a role in proximal promoter activity. Proteins present in alpha-TSH and alpha-T3 cells as well as those from GH3 somatotrope-derived cells interact with this region. The upstream area inhibited proximal alpha-promoter activity by 80% when transfected into GH3 cells. Repression in GH3 cells was mediated through a different mechanism than enhancement, as supported by the following evidence. Reversing the orientation of the area resulted in a loss of proximal promoter activation in alpha-TSH and alpha-T3 cells but did not relieve repression in GH3 cells. Mutation of proximal sites shown to be important for activation had no effect on repression. Finally, bidirectional deletional analysis revealed that multiple elements are involved in activation and repression and, together with the DNA binding studies, suggests that these processes may be mediated through closely juxtaposed or even overlapping elements, thus perhaps defining a new class of bifunctional gene regulatory sequence.

Animals↗

Transcriptional repression from the c-myc P2 promoter by the zinc finger protein ZF87/MAZ.

ZF87/MAZ is a zinc finger-containing transcription factor that was cloned based on its ability to bind to a site within the c-myc P2 promoter. However, its role in the control of c-myc transcription has not yet been well established. Here we have analyzed the effect of ZF87/MAZ overexpression on transcription from the murine c-myc P2 promoter. It was found that when overexpressed in COS cells, ZF87/MAZ significantly represses transcription from P2. The repression is mediated through the ME1a2 element, located at position -86 relative to the P2 transcriptional start site, and is not mediated through either the E2F or the ME1a1 sites. ZF87/MAZ functions as a true transcriptional repressor since it can repress transcription independently of the c-myc promoter, as part of a fusion with the GAL4 protein. The repressive domain within ZF87/MAZ is located in the amino-terminal half of the protein, a region rich in proline and alanine residues. ZF87/MAZ therefore shares features (i.e. a Pro/Ala-rich region) with those of known transcriptional repressor proteins.

Animals↗