Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Motion”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,297 records · Page 72Linked to original sources
PubMed1998

Scalp distribution components of brain activity evoked by visual motion stimuli.

We analyzed the scalp distribution of electrical brain activity elicited by visual motion stimuli in 14 healthy adults. Stimuli were square-wave gratings of high or low contrast moving with a velocity of 4.9 deg/s on a computer monitor. Adaptation to motion was varied by changing the so-called duty cycle of stimulus presentation (i.e., the relation of motion to total presentation time) in order to enhance motion-related activity. Data obtained with motion stimuli were compared with checkerboard pattern reversal evoked activity. Spatial principal components analysis revealed four latent topographical components that accounted for 92.05% of the variance. Two components showed occipital extreme values surrounded by steep potential gradients while another two components displayed lateralized activity. Analysis of the contribution of these spatial components to the observed potential fields revealed significant differences between activity evoked by pattern reversal and that evoked by motion. The topographical patterns of cortical activation changed rapidly within 240 ms after motion onset. Our results confirm the sequential and parallel activation of different neuronal generators selectively sensitive to physical stimulus parameters of motion stimuli. The converging evidence of specialized quality-specific streams of sensory processing stemming from single-unit recordings in monkeys and imaging methods is supplemented by our electrophysiological results reflecting the activation of different brain areas.

Adaptation, Physiological↗
PubMed2000

Interactions between first- and second-order motion revealed by optokinetic nystagmus.

A previous study has suggested that second-order motion is ineffective at driving optokinetic nystagmus (OKN) when presented alone. First- and second-order motion cues interact in creating the perception of motion. Is there an interaction between first- and second-order cues in the control of eye movements? We presented combinations of first- and second-order cues moving in the same or opposite directions and measured the eye movements evoked, to look for a modification of the oculomotor response to first-order motion by simultaneously presented second-order cues. Dynamic random noise was used as a carrier for first- and second-order drifting gratings (13.4 degrees/s; 0.25 cycles/degree; 64 x 48 degrees screen viewed at 28.5 cm). Second-order gratings were defined by spatial modulation of the luminance flicker frequency of noise pixels of constant contrast (50%). A first-order, luminance-defined grating (13.4 degrees/s; 0.25 cycles/degree; variable contrast from 4-50%) was moved in either the same or the opposite direction. Eye movements were recorded by video-oculography from six subjects as they looked straight ahead. The gain (eye velocity/stimulus velocity) of first-order-evoked OKN increased with contrast. The presence of flicker-defined second-order motion in the opposite direction attenuated this OKN below a first-order contrast of 15%, although it had little effect at higher contrasts. When first- and second-order motion were in the same direction, there was an enhancement of the OKN response. We conclude that second-order motion can modify the optokinetic response to simultaneously presented first-order motion.

Contrast Sensitivity↗
PubMed2002

A Bayesian model of stereopsis depth and motion direction discrimination.

The extraction of stereoscopic depth from retinal disparity, and motion direction from two-frame kinematograms, requires the solution of a correspondence problem. In previous psychophysical work [Read and Eagle (2000) Vision Res 40: 3345-3358], we compared the performance of the human stereopsis and motion systems with correlated and anti-correlated stimuli. We found that, although the two systems performed similarly for narrow-band stimuli, broadband anti-correlated kinematograms produced a strong perception of reversed motion, whereas the stereograms appeared merely rivalrous. I now model these psychophysical data with a computational model of the correspondence problem based on the known properties of visual cortical cells. Noisy retinal images are filtered through a set of Fourier channels tuned to different spatial frequencies and orientations. Within each channel, a Bayesian analysis incorporating a prior preference for small disparities is used to assess the probability of each possible match. Finally, information from the different channels is combined to arrive at a judgement of stimulus disparity. Each model system--stereopsis and motion--has two free parameters: the amount of noise they are subject to, and the strength of their preference for small disparities. By adjusting these parameters independently for each system, qualitative matches are produced to psychophysical data, for both correlated and anti-correlated stimuli, across a range of spatial frequency and orientation bandwidths. The motion model is found to require much higher noise levels and a weaker preference for small disparities. This makes the motion model more tolerant of poor-quality reverse-direction false matches encountered with anti-correlated stimuli, matching the strong perception of reversed motion that humans experience with these stimuli. In contrast, the lower noise level and tighter prior preference used with the stereopsis model means that it performs close to chance with anti-correlated stimuli, in accordance with human psychophysics. Thus, the key features of the experimental data can be reproduced assuming that the motion system experiences more effective noise than the stereoscopy system and imposes a less stringent preference for small disparities.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

Detection of motion onset and offset: reaction time and visual evoked potential analysis.

Manual reaction time (RT) and visual evoked potentials (VEP) were measured in motion onset and offset detection tasks. A considerable homology was observed between the temporal structure of RTs and VEP intervals, provided that the change in motion was detected as soon as the VEP signal has reached critical threshold amplitude. Both manual reactions and VEP rise in latency as the velocity of the onset or offset motion decreases and were well approximated by the same negative power function with the exponent close to -2/3. This indicates that motion processing is normalised by subtracting the initial motion vector from ongoing motion. A comparison of the motion onset VEP signals in two different conditions, in one of which the observer was instructed to abstain from the reaction and in the other to indicate as fast as possible the beginning of the motion, contained accurate information about the manual response.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Discrimination of intentional and random motion paths by pigeons.

Twelve pigeons ( Columba livia) were trained on a go/no-go schedule to discriminate between two kinds of movement patterns of dots, which to human observers appear to be "intentional" and "non-intentional" movements. In experiment 1, the intentional motion stimulus contained one dot (a "wolf") that moved systematically towards another dot as though stalking it, and three distractors ("sheep"). The non-intentional motion stimulus consisted of four distractors but no stalker. Birds showed some improvement of discrimination as the sessions progressed, but high levels of discrimination were not reached. In experiment 2, the same birds were tested with different stimuli. The same parameters were used but the number of intentionally moving dots in the intentional motion stimulus was altered, so that three wolves stalked one sheep. Despite the enhanced difference of movement patterns, the birds did not show any further improvement in discrimination. However, birds for which the non-intentional stimulus was associated with reward showed a decline in discrimination. These results indicated that pigeons can discriminate between stimuli that do and do not contain an element that human observer see as moving intentionally. However, as no feature-positive effect was found in experiment 1, it is assumed that pigeons did not perceive or discriminate these stimuli on the basis that the intentional stimuli contained a feature that the non-intentional stimuli lacked, though the convergence seen in experiment 2 may have been an effective feature for the pigeons. Pigeons seem to be able to recognise some form of multiple simultaneously goal-directed motions, compared to random motions, as a distinctive feature, but do not seem to use simple "intentional" motion paths of two geometrical figures, embedded in random motions, as a feature whose presence or absence differentiates motion displays.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Motion-onset VEPs to translating, radial, rotating and spiral stimuli.

Motion-onset related visual evoked potentials (M-VEPs) were recorded as a result of the three basic (translating, radial and rotating) and one complex (spiral) motion stimulations in five subjects. Low contrast, retinotopically scaled patterns evoked potentials with major motion-onset specific negativity N160 with maximum in the parieto-temporal region. All multidirectional motion stimuli elicited the motion-onset response of significantly higher amplitude and shorter latency compared to the translating (unidirectional) motion. The rotation-onset evoked potentials had significantly shorter latencies than the rest of explored stimuli. The most stable responses with the largest N160 amplitude were recorded to the radial motion. After masking of the central 20 degrees of the visual field these motion-onset VEPs were acquired without statistically significant amplitude drop. The efficiency and usefulness of the radial stimulus is presented in two clinical cases.

Adult↗
PubMed1981

On the relativity of perceived motion.

Perceived stability of the visual world during eye movements is traditionally explained as due to the presence of extraretinal signals, equal in magnitude to retinal signals. Motion is perceived when the two signals differ. An experiment is reported in which motion thresholds were measured during smooth pursuit eye movements. The results show that the traditional view is incomplete. Motion is only perceived when the two signals differ by at least a just noticeable difference (JND), the magnitude of which depends on ocular velocity and is independent of the direction of stimulus motion relative to the eyes. The data lead to the rejection of theories according to which ocular velocity is under-represented in extraretinal signals. In addition they show that retinal image motion carries no information about stimulus motion. Perceived motion, direction and velocity are relative concepts. They depend on the JND and therefore they are relative to extraretinal signals. This principle explains the Filehne illusion and even predicts the Aubert-Fleischl phenomenon. A similar analysis can be applied to understand vestibular effects on motion perception.

Differential Threshold↗
PubMed1984

Sensitivity of complex cells in cat striate cortex to relative motion.

Sensitivity of 95 complex cells to relative motion between oriented bars and textured backgrounds was investigated monocularly in the striate cortex of lightly anesthetized, paralyzed cats. Cells were classified conventionally. Those in deep layers were either direction-selective, or strongly preferred one direction of motion, and responded well to background texture motion alone: backgrounds potentiated the response to the bar in the cell's preferred direction when moved in phase, or in the opposite direction when moved in antiphase; other combinations depressed the level of response compared with that for the bar alone. The majority of direction-selective or strongly direction-biased cells in superficial layers behaved similarly. The most interesting superficial-layer cells were bidirectional or weakly direction-biased, and recorded closer to the cortical surface than the direction-selective neurons. A majority showed preference for relative motion, some for antiphase, others for in-phase motion, regardless of the absolute direction of motion across the receptive field, which could not be accounted for on the basis of separate responses to bars and backgrounds alone. Three of the superficial-layer direction-selective cells also showed preference for antiphase relative motion. In a few complex cells from superficial laminae, backgrounds were either without influence on responses to oriented stimuli, or purely suppressive. Visual backgrounds against which objects are perceived are usually neither featureless nor motionless: the results suggest that most complex cells in striate cortex are sensitive to the context in which objects are seen and susceptible to relationships between objects and their backgrounds in relative motion.

Animals↗
PubMed1987

Direction specific masking and the analysis of motion in two dimensions.

We measured the effects of moving two-component cosine grating masks on the detectability of a moving spatially localized test pattern with a 1.0 octave spatial frequency bandwidth. Masking was used to distinguish between two-component patterns with fluid motion (blobs) and those with rigid motion (plaids). The two gratings which made up the two-dimensional masking patterns were always of the same spatial frequency and contrast, but moved in different directions. We find that plaid masks consistently produced threshold elevations that are 2.0-4.0 times greater than are produced by a single component mask at twice the contrast. Furthermore, this effect is nearly independent of the angle between the two mask components. For fluid motion, however, masking is determined by the mask component whose direction of motion is closest to that of the test. The results obtained with moving two-dimensional patterns demonstrate that, for blobs, the motion of the pattern as a whole has no effect on the degree of masking, whereas, for plaids, the signals arising from the two components interact in a nonlinear manner, thus producing a substantial enhancement of masking, which is clearly related to the coherent motion of the entire pattern. These data shed light on the properties of higher order motion units (possibly in MT cortex) that respond to the direction of two-dimensional pattern motion, suggesting that they combine, in a nonlinear manner, the outputs of units which respond independently to the direction of each mask component.

Form Perception↗
PubMed1989

Interattribute apparent motion.

Apparent motion can be seen between two alternating stimuli even if they are defined with respect to their background by attributes other than luminance (such as color, or texture). We measured motion strength as the maximum separation between two alternating stimuli which produced an impression of motion, for conditions in which the two stimuli were defined by the same attribute (intra-attribute) as well as conditions in which they were defined by different attributes (interattribute). The attributes used to define the stimuli were luminance, color, texture, relative motion, or stereopsis. The results indicate that motion was seen for all the intra-attribute conditions about equally well. The results also show that interattribute motion could be seen for all combinations studied. The motion strength in these cases was about 80% of that for the intra-attribute conditions. The process responsible for this motion perception must therefore be able to combine information from different attributes.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

Contrast dependence of short-range apparent motion.

The apparent motion of band-pass filtered random dot kinematograms was assessed by measurements of two alternative direction discrimination performance. In the case of two-dimensional (isotropically filtered) stimuli, the results were largely independent of contrast: at Michelson contrasts of 5 and 50%, near-perfect direction discrimination was obtainable for a limited range of displacements. However for one-dimensional (grating) stimuli, apparent motion seems to be highly dependent on contrast. At 5% contrast, performance was comparable to that obtained with the two-dimensional stimuli. At 50% contrast the motion percept broke down to a large extent, with consistently poor direction discrimination being obtained. The breakdown of apparent motion is interpreted in terms of a decreased signal-to-noise ratio in the pooled response of motion detectors that are tending to contrast saturation. Here, "noise" refers to the sampling components present in any apparent motion sequence. Evidence relating to the sampling frequency of the motion sequence is presented to support the hypothesis. It is argued that the discrepancy between the results obtained with one- and two-dimensional stimuli support the idea that motion is initially encoded by orientationally tuned mechanisms.

Contrast Sensitivity↗
PubMed1990

On and off pathway contributions to apparent motion perception.

We studied the separability and/or interaction of the On and Off pathways in their role as inputs to visual motion perception. Using the long-range motion perception system, we asked if the motion system can use brightness polarity information, by testing whether correspondence is preferred between elements for which brightness polarity is preserved. We found such a preference, suggesting that brightness polarity information is indeed available to the motion system. However, under certain conditions motion is perceived even though the brightness polarity of apparent motion stimulus elements is reversed, indicating that the apparent motion system does integrate information from these two pathways. The source of the preference for maintaining polarity seems not to be the different brightnesses of the dark and bright stimulus elements, but the very fact that information must be integrated from different pathways. We relate the characteristics of the dependence of the motion perception on element contrast and contrast sign to those of previously reported visual evoked potential responses to brightness increments and decrements.

Contrast Sensitivity↗
PubMed1991

The kinetic depth effect and optic flow--II. First- and second-order motion.

We use a difficult shape identification task to analyze how humans extract 3D surface structure from dynamic 2D stimuli--the kinetic depth effect (KDE). Stimuli composed of luminous tokens moving on a less luminous background yield accurate 3D shape identification regardless of the particular token used (either dots, lines, or disks). These displays stimulate both the 1st-order (Fourier-energy) motion detectors and 2nd-order (nonFourier) motion detectors. To determine which system supports KDE, we employ stimulus manipulations that weaken or distort 1st-order motion energy (e.g. frame-to-frame alternation of the contrast polarity of tokens) and manipulations that create microbalanced stimuli which have no useful 1st-order motion energy. All manipulations that impair 1st-order motion energy correspondingly impair 3D shape identification. In certain cases, 2nd-order motion could support limited KDE, but it was not robust and was of low spatial resolution. We conclude that 1st-order motion detectors are the primary input to the kinetic depth system. To determine minimal conditions for KDE, we use a two frame display. Under optimal conditions, KDE supports shape identification performance at 63-94% of full-rotation displays (where baseline is 5%). Increasing the amount of 3D rotation portrayed or introducing a blank inter-stimulus interval impairs performance. Together, our results confirm that the human KDE computation of surface shape uses a global optic flow computed primarily by 1st-order motion detectors with minor 2nd-order inputs. Accurate 3D shape identification requires only two views and therefore does not require knowledge of acceleration.

Depth Perception↗
PubMed1992

Lower threshold of motion for one and two dimensional patterns in central and peripheral vision.

Lower motion thresholds for discriminating opposing motion directions were compared for one dimensional (grating) and two dimensional (plaid) stimuli in central and peripheral vision. The results were consistent with a two-stage model of motion sensitivity in which threshold-limiting noise occurs at both stages, and the speed as well as the direction of the resultant motion is determined by intersection-of-constraints (IOC) from the component motions. The results do not support a purely geometric interpretation of the IOC model, in which thresholds for plaid stimuli are related to thresholds of component gratings by a geometric factor. Neither do the data favour explanations in which local luminance features (i.e. blobs) are detected and their velocity determined. Monte-Carlo simulations of the two-stage process predict thresholds across variations in component direction, contrast, and visual field eccentricity. Lower motion thresholds for gratings and plaids both follow a saturating function of contrast; the fit between grating and plaid data is improved when the plaid contrast is expressed in terms of the contrast of its components. Although less contrast saturation was found in the periphery, in relative terms, plaid and grating motion thresholds were similar in central and peripheral vision, implying cortical magnifications are similar for mechanisms which process grating and plaid motion.

Contrast Sensitivity↗
PubMed1992

Competing motion paths in sequence of random dot patterns.

Global motion perception from a sequence of random dot patterns has been studied by means of the competition technique which consists of making a normally less salient motion path in a superimposed multiple-path stimulus more powerful by adding luminous energy to elements forming this path. The perceived motion direction of a sequence of random dot patterns can be dramatically changed by increasing luminance of some fraction of dots leaving all spatial and temporal intervals between dots unchanged. The threshold luminance increment delta I that is required in order to change the perceived motion direction indicates that differently oriented local motion vectors are resolved into a single common motion vector along which the whole pattern appears to move. An inverse spatial proximity rule was discovered: within a certain spatial limit the motion strength of a particular motion path is proportional to the distance between stimulus elements forming this path.

Humans↗
PubMed1992

The influence of terminators on motion integration across space.

Individual motion measurements are inherently ambiguous since the component of motion parallel to a homogeneous translating edge cannot be measured. Numerous models have proposed that the visual system solves this ambiguity through the integration of motion measurements across disparate contours. To examine this proposal, subjects observed a translating diamond through four stationary apertures. Since the diamond's motion could not be determined from any single contour, motion integration across contours was required to determine the diamond's direction of motion. We demonstrate that observers have difficulty accurately integrating motion information across space. Performance improved when the diamond stimulus was presented at 7 degrees eccentricity, through jagged apertures, or at low contrast. Taken together, these results imply that integration across space is more likely when the motion of contour terminators is less salient or reliable.

Contrast Sensitivity↗
PubMed1995

Contrast dependence of motion-onset and pattern-reversal evoked potentials.

This study deals with the effect of stimulus contrast, between 1.3% and 96%, on the visual evoked potentials (VEPs) for onset of motion and for pattern reversal of checkerboard stimuli. The VEPs for pattern reversal and for the onset of motion both contain an initial positive peak (P1; peak latency about 120 msec) followed by a later negative peak (N2; peak latency 160-200 msec). However the P1 peak dominates the pattern-reversal VEP when recorded from the midline occipital lead, where it is maximal, while the N2 peak is larger in the motion-onset VEP, especially when recorded from unipolar lateral occipital leads. Whereas the amplitude of the P1 peak in both the pattern-reversal VEP and the motion-onset VEP decreases with decreasing contrast (becoming undetectable at a contrast of about 2% for the motion-onset VEP), the amplitude of the N2 peak in both types of VEP does not vary significantly with contrast, above a contrast of 1.3%. The increase in peak latency with decreasing contrast is also more pronounced for the positive than the negative peaks of both types of VEP. Taking into account the high contrast sensitivity of the magnocellular system (thought to be involved in the processing of motion) compared with the parvocellular system (probably more concerned with the processing of form), our findings suggest that for both motion-onset and pattern-reversal VEPs the negative peak is attributable to the motion-processing magnocellular pathway and the positive peak to the form-processing parvocellular system.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Induced motion may account for the illusory transformation of optic flow fields found by Duffy and Wurtz.

Duffy and Wurtz [(1993) Vision Research, 33, 1481-1490] found an illusory shift in the position of the focus of expansion (FOE) of random dot patterns when planar motion was superimposed on expanding radial motion. Subjects indicated that this illusory shift was in the direction of the planar motion. This is the opposite direction to a true shift in the FOE that is perceived when the planar motion is vector summed with the expanding motion. We account for this illusion by suggesting that planar motion induces opposite motion on the expanding dots which after vector summation produces the illusory shift in the FOE. We use a matching technique with a method of adjustment to measure induced motion and perceived FOE in moving random dot patterns and present the results in support of our assertion.

Humans↗