Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “REPRESSION”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,279 records · Page 71Linked to original sources

Repression at a distance by the global regulator KorB of promiscuous IncP plasmids.

KorB protein (358 amino acids) binds to 12 highly conserved sequences on the RK2 genome and co-ordinates the expression of at least five operons encoding genes for stable inheritance and plasmid transfer. KorB represses the trfA, korA and klaA promoters where it binds 4 bp upstream of the -35 region (class I KorB operators, OB). We show here that KorB on its own can also repress the trbA, trbB, kfrA and kleA promoters where OB is between 80 and 189 bp away from the transcription start point (class II operator). A C-terminal deletion of 17 amino acids resulted in the loss of KorB's ability to repress through class II operator but not through class I operator. This deletion reduced multimerization of His6-tailed KorB protein in vitro and greatly reduced binding specificity for fragments containing OB sequences. At the trbBp region, where OB9 lies 189 bp upstream of the transcription start point, mutagenesis of a proposed secondary binding site overlapping the trbBp -35 region had no effect on the ability of KorB to repress trbBp. Nevertheless, gel retardation analysis showed that KorB binding is promoted by sequences upstream and downstream of OB9 and that KorB can form higher order complexes on DNA. However, DNase I footprinting suggested that RNA polymerase may interact directly with KorB bound at OB9 and implied that contacts between these proteins could be responsible for the action of KorB at a distance.

Bacterial Proteins↗

In vitro activation and repression of photosynthesis gene transcription in Rhodobacter capsulatus.

It has been known for over half a century that anoxygenic photosynthetic bacteria maximally synthesize their photosystems in the absence of oxygen. During the last decade, it has become clear that this regulation is largely at the transcriptional level, with photosynthesis genes expressed only under anaerobic conditions. We describe here in vitro reconstitution of activation and repression of three photosynthesis promoters, bch (bacteriochlorophyll biosynthesis), puc (light-harvesting II apoproteins) and puf (reaction centre and light-harvesting I apoproteins) using purified transcription factors and RNA polymerase from Rhodobacter capsulatus. Previous genetic results have indicated that each of these three promoters is differentially regulated by three key regulators: CrtJ acting as a repressor of bch and puc and the two-component regulators RegA/RegB, which are activators of puc and puf. These regulators are distinct from those that mediate oxygen control in enteric bacteria. Our in vitro studies show that these purified regulators directly control the expression of the housekeeping RNA polymerase at these promoters. High-level basal expression of the bch promoter is shown to be repressed by CrtJ. The puc promoter is activated by the RegB-phosphorylated RegA protein and additionally repressed by CrtJ. At the puc promoter, CrtJ effectively competes for promoter binding with RegA, while at the bch promoter, repression appears to be by competition for the RNA polymerase binding site. In contrast to what has been suggested previously, the RegA-activated puf promoter is demonstrated as being recognized by the housekeeping RNA polymerase. We also discuss evidence that RegA approximately P activation of the puc and puf promoters involves recruitment of RNA polymerase by different modes of protein-protein interaction.

Bacterial Proteins↗

SUT1p interaction with Cyc8p(Ssn6p) relieves hypoxic genes from Cyc8p-Tup1p repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

SUT1 is a hypoxic gene encoding a nuclear protein that belongs to the Zn[II]2Cys-6 family. It has been shown that constitutive expression of SUT1 induces exogenous sterol uptake in aerobically growing Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells. A differential display approach was used to identify genes whose transcription is modified upon SUT1 induction. Within the promoter sequence of one of these genes, DAN1, we identified the region responsive to SUT1 and showed that it has a strong repressive activity when cloned in the vicinity of distinct promoters. Upon SUT1 constitutive expression in aerobiosis, the repression is released, allowing enhanced transcription of the reporter gene. We provide evidence that the repression is promoted by the Cyc8p(Ssn6p)-Tup1p co-repressor and that release of repression is the result of a physical interaction between Sut1p and Cyc8p. Moreover, genetic data suggest that complete derepression of the reporter gene requires a functional Cyc8p. In addition, we show that Sut1p is involved in the induction of hypoxic gene transcription when the cells are shifted from aerobiosis to anaerobiosis.

Aerobiosis↗

Two different modes of transcription repression of the Escherichia coli acetate operon by IclR.

IclR is a repressor for the Escherichia coli aceBAK operon, which encodes isocitrate lyase (aceB), malate synthase (aceA) and isocitrate dehydroge-nase kinase/phosphorylase (aceK) in the glyoxylate bypass. IclR also represses the expression of iclR in an autogenous manner. DNase I footprinting and in vitro transcription assays indicated that IclR binds to an IclR box (-21 to +14), which overlaps the iclR promoter and thus competes with the RNA polymerase for DNA binding, leading to transcription repression. In the case of the aceBAK operon, IclR binds to IclR box II between -52 and -19 of the aceB promoter and interferes with binding of the RNA polymerase to this promoter. A secondary IclR binding site (IclR box I) was identified between -125 and -99 of the aceB promoter. IclR binds to this IclR box I even after formation of the aceB promoter open complex and, moreover, induces disassembly of the open complex, leading to repression of aceB transcription. In parallel, the location of the C-terminal domain of the RNA polymerase alpha subunit (alphaCTD) on DNA is shifted close to the IclR box I, indicating that direct interaction between the alphaCTD and the IclR box I-associated IclR caused the repression.

Acetates↗

Vibrio cholerae H-NS domain structure and function with respect to transcriptional repression of ToxR regulon genes reveals differences among H-NS family members.

H-NS is an abundant bacterial protein involved in transcriptional silencing of a variety of environmentally responsive genes during growth under non-permissive conditions. We have previously demonstrated a direct role for H-NS in the negative modulation of expression of several genes within the ToxR virulence regulon of Vibrio cholerae. Here we have undertaken extensive mutagenesis of the structural and functional domains of the H-NS protein to determine the contribution of each to the regulation of gene expression. Insertions within, or truncations of, the C-terminal conserved DNA-binding domain prevent repression of toxT and ctx, as expected. Dominant negative experiments demonstrate that V. cholerae H-NS represses gene expression as an oligomeric protein. Hydrophobic coiledcoil interactions have been shown to provide oligomerization capability in other H-NS orthologues. We used site-directed mutagenesis to construct altered V. cholerae H-NS proteins, including an extensive internal deletion within the predicted coiledcoil domain. Remarkably, these proteins were competent to repress gene expression and to form oligomers. Chimeric H-NS proteins, using sequences from both Escherichia coli and V. cholerae H-NS orthologues, revealed that V. cholerae H-NS possesses a second oligomerization domain in the N-terminal 24 amino acids of the protein. Overall, our results suggest DNA binding and protein oligomerization, provided by either the central coiledcoil or N-terminal domain, are required for repression of promoters responsive to H-NS within the ToxR regulon.

Bacterial Proteins↗

Sucrose-specific signalling represses translation of the Arabidopsis ATB2 bZIP transcription factor gene.

The Arabidopsis bZIP transcription factor gene ATB2 has been shown previously to be expressed in a light-regulated and tissue-specific way. Here we describe the precise localization of ATB2 expression, using transgenic lines containing an ATB2 promoter-GUS reporter gene construct. The observed expression pattern suggests a role for ATB2 in the control of processes associated with the transport or utilization of metabolites. Remarkably, expression of the ATB2-GUS reporter gene construct was specifically repressed by sucrose. Other sugars, such as glucose and fructose, alone or in combination, were ineffective. Repression was observed at external sucrose concentrations exceeding 25 mM. Transcript levels of both the endogenous ATB2 gene and the ATB2-GUS reporter gene were not repressed by sucrose, suggesting that sucrose affects mRNA translation. This translational regulation involves the ATB2 leader sequence because deletion of the leader resulted in loss of sucrose repression. Our results provide evidence for a sucrose-specific sugar sensing and signalling system in plants.

Arabidopsis↗

EDEN-dependent translational repression of maternal mRNAs is conserved between Xenopus and Drosophila.

Translational control is a key level in regulating gene expression in oocytes and eggs because many mRNAs are synthesized and stored during oogenesis for latter use at various stages of oocyte maturation and embryonic development. Understanding the molecular mechanisms that underlie this translational control is therefore crucial. Another important issue is the evolutionary conservation of these mechanisms--in other words the determination of their universal and specific aspects. We report here a comparative analysis of a translational repression mechanism that depends on the EDEN (embryo deadenylation element) element. This small cis-acting element, localized in the 3' untranslated region of c-mos and Eg mRNAs, was shown to be involved in a deadenylation process. We demonstrate here that in Xenopus embryos, mRNAs that contain an EDEN are translationally repressed. Next, transgenic flies were used to study the effect of the EDEN motif on translation in Drosophila oocytes. We show that this element also causes the translational repression of a reporter gene in Drosophila demonstrating that the EDEN-dependent translational repression is functionally conserved between Xenopus and Drosophila.

3' Untranslated Regions↗

The putative high-affinity nitrate transporter NRT2.1 represses lateral root initiation in response to nutritional cues.

Lateral root initiation is strongly repressed in Arabidopsis by the combination of high external sucrose and low external nitrate. A previously isolated mutant, lin1, can overcome this repression. Here, we show that lin1 carries a missense mutation in the NRT2.1 gene. Several allelic mutants, including one in which the NRT2.1 gene is completely deleted, show similar phenotypes to lin1 and fail to complement lin1. NRT2.1 encodes a putative high-affinity nitrate transporter that functions at low external nitrate concentrations. Direct measurement of nitrate uptake and nitrate content in the lin1 mutant seedlings established that both are indeed reduced. Because repression of lateral root initiation in WT plants can be relieved by increased concentrations of external nitrate, it is surprising to find that repression is also relieved by a defect in a component of the high-affinity nitrate uptake system. Furthermore, lateral root initiation is increased in lin1 relative to WT even when seedlings are grown on nitrate-free media, suggesting that the mutant phenotype is nitrate-independent. These results indicate that NRT2.1 is a repressor of lateral root initiation and that this role is independent of nitrate uptake. We propose that Arabidopsis NRT2.1 acts either as a nitrate sensor or signal transducer to coordinate the development of the root system with nutritional cues.

Alleles↗

Insulin inhibits transcription of IRS-2 gene in rat liver through an insulin response element (IRE) that resembles IREs of other insulin-repressed genes.

Recent data indicate that sustained elevations in plasma insulin suppress the mRNA for IRS-2, a component of the insulin signaling pathway in liver, and that this deficiency contributes to hepatic insulin resistance and inappropriate gluconeogenesis. Here, we use nuclear run-on assays to show that insulin inhibits transcription of the IRS-2 gene in the livers of intact rats. Insulin also inhibited transcription of a reporter gene driven by the human IRS-2 promoter that was transfected into freshly isolated rat hepatocytes. The human promoter contains a heptanucleotide sequence, TGTTTTG, that is identical to the insulin response element (IRE) identified previously in the promoters of insulin-repressed genes. Single base pair substitutions in this IRE decreased transcription of the IRS-2-driven reporter in the absence of insulin and abolished insulin-mediated repression. We conclude that insulin represses transcription of the IRS-2 gene by blocking the action of a positive factor that binds to the IRE. Sustained repression of IRS-2, as occurs in chronic hyperinsulinemia, contributes to hepatic insulin resistance and accelerates the development of the diabetic state.

Animals↗

Myc represses the p21(WAF1/CIP1) promoter and interacts with Sp1/Sp3.

The cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p21((WAF1/CIP1)) inhibits proliferation both in vitro and in vivo, and overexpression of p21 in normal and tumor cell lines results in cell cycle arrest. In contrast, ectopic expression of Myc alleviates G(1) cell cycle arrest. Recent studies showed that Myc can repress p21 transcription, thereby overriding a p21-mediated cell cycle checkpoint. We found that activation of a Myc-estrogen receptor fusion protein by 4-hydroxytamoxifen in mouse cells resulted in suppression of endogenous p21 transcription. This effect was observed in the absence of de novo protein synthesis and was independent of histone deacetylase activity. In transient transfection studies, Myc effectively repressed p21 promoter constructs containing only 119 bp of sequence upstream of the transcription start site. This region contains multiple Sp1-binding sites and a potential initiator element, but no canonical Myc DNA-binding sites. Deletion of the potential initiator element does not affect repression of the p21 promoter by c-Myc. Coimmunoprecipitation and glutathione S-transferase pull-down experiments demonstrate that c-Myc may form complexes with Sp1/Sp3. We found that the central region of c-Myc interacts with the zinc finger domain of Sp1. Because Sp1 is required for p21 transcription, it is possible that Myc may down-regulate p21 transcription, at least in part, by sequestering Sp1. Repression of the p21 promoter may contribute to the ability of c-Myc to promote cell proliferation.

Animals↗

Transcriptional repression of euchromatic genes by Drosophila heterochromatin protein 1 and histone modifiers.

In Drosophila, heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1) suppresses the expression of euchromatic genes that are artificially translocated adjacent to heterochromatin by expanding heterochromatin structure into neighboring euchromatin. The purpose of this study was to determine whether HP1 functions as a transcriptional repressor in the absence of chromosome rearrangements. Here, we show that Drosophila HP1 normally represses the expression of four euchromatic genes in a dosage-dependent manner. Three genes regulated by HP1 map to cytological region 31 of chromosome 2, which is immunostained by anti-HP1 antibodies in the salivary gland. The repressive effect of HP1 is decreased by mutation in Su(var)3-9, whose mammalian orthologue encodes a histone H3 methyltransferase and mutation in Su(var)2-1, which is correlated with histone H4 deacetylation. These data provide genetic evidence that an HP1-family protein represses the expression of euchromatic genes in a metazoan, and that histone modifiers cooperate with HP1 in euchromatic gene repression.

Animals↗

A Hox-dependent anchoring mechanism mediates transcriptional repression of autophagy-related genes at the nuclear periphery.

The spatial organization of the genome within the nucleus is critical for gene regulation, yet the mechanisms by which transcription factors (TFs) orchestrate this process remain poorly understood. Here, we demonstrate that the Drosophila Hox protein Ultrabithorax (Ubx) represses autophagy-related (atg) genes by tethering their loci to the nuclear periphery. This repressive activity relies on the interaction with the nuclear lamina component Lamin-C (LamC). Furthermore, we identify that DNA-binding of Ubx is determinant for both the physical interaction with nucleoplasmic LamC and the repression of atg genes in vivo. Together, our findings reveal a mechanism whereby a Hox TF functions as a spatial anchor, positioning target genes within a LamC-rich nuclear compartment to ensure efficient transcriptional repression.

Animals↗

Establishment and maintenance of repression by bacteriophage lambda: the role of the cI, cII, and c3 proteins.

To define the events necessary for the establishment and maintenance of repression in a lambda-infected cell, we have studied the requirements for efficient synthesis of the cI protein ("lambda-repressor"). Three classes of lambda mutants defective in the establishment of repression are also defective in the appearance of cI protein activity at the normal time. Two of these mutational classes (cII(-) and cIII(-)) probably result from inactivation of lambda-specified proteins, but the third class (cy(-)) may involve a structural defect. We conclude that at least three regulatory elements are likely to be required for the normal turn-on of cI protein synthesis in an infected nonlysogenic cell: cII and cIII proteins and an "active" y-region of lambda DNA. From these and other results, the complete role of cII and cIII proteins in the establishment of repression may involve a bifunctional regulatory activity: positive regulation of the cI gene and negative regulation of late genes. A possible molecular model for cII and cIII action is discussed. Since the cII and cIII genes are repressed by the cI protein under conditions of stable lysogeny, a separate mechanism is required for the maintenance of cI protein synthesis. After infection of a lysogen by cII(-) phage, the rate of increase of cI protein activity is substantially greater than after infection of a nonlysogen. From these and other results, the cI protein may also have a bifunctional regulatory activity: positive regulation of the cI gene and negative regulation of early lytic genes.

Autoradiography↗

Repression and autogenous stimulation in vitro by bacteriophage lambda repressor.

Purified lambda repressor protein is shown to reduce the lambda DNA-directed synthesis of proteins in vitro as determined both by net amino-acid incorporation and by analysis of specific lambda-coded proteins resolved by sodium dodecyl sulfate/polyacrylamide slab gel electrophoresis. By means of different lambda DNA templates carrying deletion and point mutations in the operators o-L or o-R, it has been possible to demonstrate repression of the synthesis of two classes of lambda proteins. The synthesis of one, class c, appears to be controlled from the operator o-L and is more efficiently repressed at low concentrations of the repressor than that of the other class of repressible lambda proteins, class d, which is controlled from the operator o-R. Several other proteins synthesized in vitro are not repressible. Some of these are coded by the J-att region. In addition, the repressor appears to have another activity, that of stimulating the synthesis of a protein identified as the repressor itself. Lambda repressor appears to stimulate its own synthesis by acting at prm, a site defined by the cis-acting mutation prm 116.

Chromosome Mapping↗

The lexA gene product represses its own promoter.

The products of the lexA and recA genes of Escherichia coli regulate the cellular response to DNA damage (the SOS response). Here we describe the cloning of the wild-type lexA gene and the identification of its 24,000-dalton protein product. We also describe construction, by recombination in vitro, of a phage that bears the lexA promoter fused to the lacZ gene. Experiments with this fusion phage and with multicopy plasmids that carry the lexA gene showed that the lexA gene product represses of its own promoter. This repression occurs even if the cell has no recA gene, showing that the lexA protein need not be complexed to the recA protein for activity. Moreover, the presence of multicopy plasmids that carry the lexA gene blocks expression of all SOS responses tested. This presumably results from two effects: (i) repression of the recA gene, the product of which is required to activate many of these responses; and (ii) direct repression of other functions involved in the SOS response.

Bacterial Proteins↗

A gene expressed in undifferentiated vegetative Dictyostelium is repressed by developmental pulses of cAMP and reinduced during dedifferentiation.

We describe the gene M4-1, whose unique pattern of developmental expression will allow us to study the molecular mechanisms controlling expression in undifferentiated cells in addition to repression in response to cAMP during development and reinduction during dedifferentiation. M4-1 is a Dictyostelium gene expressed in the undifferentiated cell. We have shown that M4-1 continues to be expressed very early during the developmental cycle but is repressed at a later stage of development, at a time coincident with the establishment of oscillations in the cAMP pool. Studies on the expression of the M4-1 gene in shaking culture, under conditions that mimic early development, have established that pulsatile stimulation of cells with cAMP is sufficient to repress M4-1 expression. Consistent with this, cells that are exposed to high levels of cAMP are unable to respond normally to cAMP oscillations and continue to express M4-1 at vegetative levels. These data indicate that low-level oscillations of cAMP are required for the repression of M4-1 expression rather than the continuous high levels of cAMP responsible for the regulation of a different class of Dictyostelium genes. We suggest that cAMP may mediate developmental expression of the Dictyostelium genome by different mechanisms. We also show that cell-cell interaction, a developmental event that occurs subsequent to the cAMP pulse, does not normally influence the regulation of M4-1. Finally, we have shown that when cAMP-pulsed cells are induced to dedifferentiate, M4-1 RNA sequences rapidly reappear in nuclei and cytoplasm, suggesting that regulation of M4-1 expression is primarily mediated at the level of transcription.

Cell Aggregation↗

Engrailed, a homeodomain protein, can repress in vitro transcription by competition with the TATA box-binding protein transcription factor IID.

Engrailed (En) is a homeodomain protein that binds to a consensus sequence (NP) and plays an important role during Drosophila development. Purified En, which is produced in Escherichia coli, binds not only to this consensus sequence but also to the TATA box of the Drosophila Hsp70 promoter and of other eukaryotic promoters. Interestingly, En represses transcription of these promoters in an in vitro-reconstituted mammalian transcription system and footprint analyses show that En competes with the TATA box-binding protein transcription factor IID for binding to the TATA box. In contrast, a stable template-committed complex formed by preincubation of transcription factor IID with the promoter is not disrupted by addition of En, and in this case transcription is not repressed. These in vitro studies suggest a transcriptional repression mechanism, involving competition between En and transcription factor IID for TATA box binding, that may be involved in En-mediated repression in vivo.

Animals↗

Relief of p53-mediated transcriptional repression by the adenovirus E1B 19-kDa protein or the cellular Bcl-2 protein.

The p53 tumor suppressor gene product is a transcriptional regulatory protein. It activates transcription from promoters that contain a p53 DNA binding site but represses many promoters that lack its binding site. High-level expression of wild-type p53 can induce apoptosis in certain cell types, and this activity can be blocked by the adenovirus E1B 19-kDa oncoprotein or by the cellular Bcl-2 oncoprotein. Here we report that p53-mediated repression of promoters that lack a p53 binding site is abrogated by the E1B 19-kDa protein or Bcl-2 oncoprotein. In contrast, transcriptional activation by p53 still occurs in the presence of either protein. The fact that two oncoproteins capable of preventing p53-mediated apoptosis also block transcriptional repression by p53 raises the possibility that p53 might induce apoptosis, at least in part, by repressing transcription.

Adenovirus E1B Proteins↗