Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “PLACEBOS”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,279 records · Page 71Linked to original sources
PubMed1999

Oral prednisolone followed by inhaled budesonide in newly diagnosed pulmonary sarcoidosis: a double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter study. Finnish Pulmonary Sarcoidosis Study Group.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of oral prednisolone, followed by inhaled budesonide, in patients with newly diagnosed (<3 months) stage I and stage II pulmonary sarcoidosis. DESIGN: Double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter study. SETTING: Twenty pulmonary medicine departments in Finland. PATIENTS: One hundred eighty-nine adult patients were randomized to treatment. Patients with erythema nodosum or stage IV sarcoidosis (pulmonary fibrosis), and patients requiring immediate treatment with oral corticosteroids for extrapulmonary lesions or chronic illnesses were excluded. TREATMENT: The patients received either oral prednisolone for 3 months (20 mg/d for 8 weeks, 15 mg/d for 2 weeks, and 10 mg/d for 2 weeks) followed by inhaled budesonide (Pulmicort Turbuhaler; Astra Draco; Lund, Sweden) for 15 months at 800 microg bid, or placebo tablets followed by placebo inhaler therapy. MEASUREMENTS: Chest radiographs, lung volumes (FVC), diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (D(LCO)), serum angiotensin-converting enzyme (SACE), and beta2-microglobulin at 3-month intervals. RESULTS: After 3 months of treatment, radiographic improvements were seen in the active-treatment group when compared to the placebo-treatment group. At 6 months, the difference was still statistically significant. Later, no differences were found. In patients with initial stage I lesions, neither the FVC nor the D(LCO) (the percent predicted mean values) changed during the study, as they were normal from the beginning. In patients with initial stage II disease, the difference in the FVC mean values between the groups also remained unchanged throughout the study. In stage II patients treated for 18 months, but not earlier, the difference in D(LCO) became statistically significant; the largest differences were seen in patients with initial FVC values <80% of predicted and D(LCO) values <75% of predicted. The decrease in SACE in the active-treated stage II patients was significantly larger than in the placebo-treated patients. No difference was observed in adverse events between the active-treated patients and the placebo-treated patients. CONCLUSION: Treatment is not required for patients with stage I disease. An initial treatment with prednisolone followed by long-term inhalation of budesonide is more effective than placebo in patients with stage II disease. Sequential oral and inhaled corticosteroid therapy may be an alternative treatment regimen for stage II sarcoidosis patients, rather than long-term oral corticosteroid therapy alone.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed2001

Effect of continuous positive airway pressure and placebo treatment on sympathetic nervous activity in patients with obstructive sleep apnea.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: We studied the effect of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment on sympathetic nervous activity in 38 patients with obstructive sleep apnea. DESIGN: Randomized, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: Patients underwent polysomnography on three occasions in a clinical research center, and had BP monitored over 24 h at home. All of the patients had sleep apnea with a respiratory disturbance index (RDI) > 15. INTERVENTIONS: The patients were randomized blindly to CPAP or placebo (CPAP at ineffective pressure) treatment. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Prior to therapy, the number of apneas and the severity of nocturnal hypoxia correlated significantly with daytime urinary norepinephrine (NE) levels, but not nighttime urinary NE levels. CPAP treatment lowered daytime BP from 99 +/- 2 mm Hg to 95 +/- 3 mm Hg (mean +/- SEM) and nighttime BP from 93 +/- 3 mm Hg to 88 +/- 3 mm Hg. Placebo CPAP treatment decreased both day and night mean BP only 2 mm Hg. CPAP, but not placebo, treatment lowered daytime plasma NE levels by 23%, daytime urine NE levels by 36%, daytime heart rate by 2.6 beats/min, and increased lymphocyte beta(2)-adrenergic receptor sensitivity (all p < 0.05). The effect of CPAP treatment on nighttime urine NE levels and heart rate did not differ from placebo treatment. There was a suggestion of an effect of placebo CPAP treatment on nighttime measures, but not on daytime measures. CONCLUSION: We conclude that daytime sympathetic nervous activation is greater with more severe sleep apnea. CPAP treatment diminished the daytime sympathetic activation; the potential nighttime effect of CPAP treatment was obscured by a small placebo effect.

Female↗
PubMed2006

Cilomilast for COPD: results of a 6-month, placebo-controlled study of a potent, selective inhibitor of phosphodiesterase 4.

BACKGROUND: COPD is a relentless, progressive disease. This study evaluated the efficacy of cilomilast, a selective phosphodiesterase (PDE) 4 inhibitor, in the treatment of COPD. METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter study in subjects with COPD. After a 4-week, single-blind, placebo run-in period, eligible subjects were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive oral cilomilast, 15 mg bid, or placebo for 24 weeks. Subjects between 40 and 80 years of age who had received a diagnosis of COPD were eligible for the study. The primary efficacy variables were changes from baseline in trough (ie, predose) FEV1 and in total score of the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). A key secondary end point was the incidence rate of COPD exacerbations. RESULTS: The average change from baseline in FEV1 over 24 weeks in the cilomilast group was an increase of 10 mL compared with a decrease of 30 mL in the placebo group (difference, 40 mL; p = 0.002). When averaged over 24 weeks, there was a clinically significant reduction in the mean total SGRQ score in subjects receiving cilomilast therapy, with a difference of 4.1 U compared with subjects who received placebo (p = 0.001). A greater percentage of subjects in the cilomilast group were exacerbation-free at 24 weeks (74%; p = 0.008) compared with placebo (62%). Adverse events were generally mild or moderate and were not unexpected for this class of medications. GI adverse events that interfered with daily activities (cilomilast, 17%; placebo, 8%) predominantly occurred within the first 3 weeks of initiating cilomilast therapy. CONCLUSION: Cilomilast is an orally active, potent, and selective inhibitor of PDE-4. Cilomilast maintained pulmonary function and improved health status, and reduced the rate of COPD exacerbations during 24 weeks of treatment. This study supports the use of cilomilast, a novel, selective PDE-4 inhibitor, in subjects with COPD.

3',5'-Cyclic-AMP Phosphodiesterases↗
PubMed2002

A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of modified-release methylphenidate in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of once-daily administration of modified-release methylphenidate (MPH MR) with placebo in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). METHODS: The study was a 3-week, double-blind, 32-site, randomized clinical trial comparing MPH MR with placebo. Children were 6 to 16 years of age, had a diagnosis of ADHD, and had not failed a previous trial of stimulant treatment for ADHD. After a 1-week, single-blind, placebo-washout period, participants received a once-daily dose of MPH MR or placebo, which was started with 1 capsule (20 mg) and individually titrated up to a maximum of 3 capsules (60 mg). The primary outcome measure was specified as a reduction in ADHD symptom severity from the teacher version of the 10-item Conners' Global Index. Investigators, teachers, and parents evaluated safety. RESULTS: The study randomized 321 children: 158 to MPH MR and 163 to placebo. Children in the MPH MR group were started on a dose of 20 mg/d and reached a mean dose of 40.7 mg/d (1.28 mg/kg/d) at endpoint. Compared with placebo, MPH MR significantly reduced ADHD symptoms ratings on the teacher version of the 10-item Conners' Global Index, on the parent version of the Conners' Global Index, on the parent assessment of global efficacy, and on investigator assessment of global improvement. The most common adverse events in the MPH MR group were headache, anorexia, abdominal pain, and insomnia. Only anorexia occurred at a rate that was significantly greater than placebo. CONCLUSION: MPH MR administered once daily in the morning is effective and safe in controlling ADHD symptoms throughout the school day.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Effect of dextromethorphan, diphenhydramine, and placebo on nocturnal cough and sleep quality for coughing children and their parents.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the commonly used over-the-counter medications dextromethorphan and diphenhydramine are superior to placebo for the treatment of nocturnal cough and sleep difficulty associated with upper respiratory infections and to determine whether parents have improved sleep quality when their children receive the medications when compared with placebo. METHODS: Parents of 100 children with upper respiratory infections were questioned to assess the frequency, severity, and bothersome nature of the nocturnal cough. Their answers were recorded on 2 consecutive days, initially on the day of presentation, when no medication had been given the previous evening, and then again on the subsequent day, when either medication or placebo was given before bedtime. Sleep quality for both the child and the parent were also assessed for both nights. RESULTS: For the entire cohort, all outcomes were significantly improved on the second night of the study when either medication or placebo was given. However, neither diphenhydramine nor dextromethorphan produced a superior benefit when compared with placebo for any of the outcomes studied. Insomnia was reported more frequently in those who were given dextromethorphan, and drowsiness was reported more commonly in those who were given diphenhydramine. CONCLUSIONS: Diphenhydramine and dextromethorphan are not superior to placebo in providing nocturnal symptom relief for children with cough and sleep difficulty as a result of an upper respiratory infection. Furthermore, the medications given to children do not result in improved quality of sleep for their parents when compared with placebo. Each clinician should consider these findings, the potential for adverse effects, and the individual and cumulative costs of the drugs before recommending them to families.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Efficacy and safety of modafinil film-coated tablets in children and adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, flexible-dose study.

OBJECTIVE: Modafinil, which is structurally and pharmacologically different from other agents that are used for the treatment of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), selectively activates the cortex and has low potential for abuse. Initial studies of the use of modafinil to treat ADHD showed significant improvements in the core symptoms of the disorder, namely inattention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity. This study evaluated a new formulation of modafinil (modafinil film-coated tablets) in children and adolescents with ADHD. METHODS: This 9-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, flexible-dose study evaluated the film-coated tablet formulation of modafinil, which was titrated to an optimal dose on the basis of efficacy and tolerability (range: 170-425 mg once daily). Efficacy was assessed by clinicians who completed the Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Rating Scale-IV (ADHD-RS-IV) based on interviews with teachers (School Version) and parents (Home Version) and the Clinical Global Impression of Improvement scale. Safety evaluation was based on assessments of adverse event reports, laboratory tests, vital signs, and body weight. RESULTS: A total of 248 subjects were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio, and 246 were treated with modafinil (n = 164) or placebo (n = 82). Treatment groups were comparable with respect to demographics and baseline characteristics. Intention-to-treat analysis (ITT) showed that compared with placebo, treatment with modafinil significantly improved the core symptoms of ADHD as shown by greater reductions in the ADHD-RS-IV School Version total scores from baseline to final visit (mean change [SD]: -15.0 [11.8] vs -7.3 [9.7]) (effect size: 0.69; 95% confidence interval: 0.57-0.82). Significant improvements were observed with modafinil treatment on the ADHD-RS-IV School Version at week 1, with improvements maintained throughout the study. Similar differences in symptom improvements were observed on the ADHD-RS-IV Home Version between modafinil-treated and placebo-treated patients. Treatment with modafinil also significantly reduced subscale scores for inattention and hyperactivity-impulsivity on both School and Home Versions compared with placebo. At the final visit, 48% of modafinil-treated patients were rated as "much" or "very much" improved in overall clinical condition compared with 17% of placebo-treated patients (Clinical Global Impression of Improvement). Most adverse events were mild to moderate in severity, and the majority resolved during treatment. The most commonly reported adverse events in the modafinil group were insomnia (29%), headache (20%), and decreased appetite (16%). Three percent of modafinil-treated patients and 4% of placebo-treated patients discontinued treatment because of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Modafinil film-coated tablets significantly improved ADHD symptoms at school and home as evaluated by clinicians, teachers, and parents. Treatment with once-daily modafinil was generally well tolerated, with few discontinuations as a result of adverse events.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Oral lysine clonixinate in the acute treatment of migraine: a double-blind placebo-controlled study.

Several oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are effective to treat migraine attacks. Lysine clonixinate (LC) is a NSAID derived from nicotinic acid that has proven to be effective in various pain syndromes such as renal colic and muscular pain. The aim of this double-blind, placebo-controlled study was to evaluate the efficacy of oral LC compared to placebo in the acute treatment of migraine. Sixty four patients with the diagnosis of migraine, according to the IHS criteria, were studied prospectively. Patients received LC or placebo once the headache reached moderate or severe intensity for 6 consecutive attacks. With regard to the moderate attacks, LC was superior than placebo after 1, 2 and 4 hours. The consumption of other rescue medications after 4 hours was significantly higher in the placebo group. With regard to the severe attacks, there was no difference between the active drug group and the placebo group concerning headache intensity and consumption of other rescue medications. We conclude that the NSAID lysine clonixinate is effective in treating moderately severe migraine attacks. It is not superior than placebo in treating severe migraine attacks.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2005

A randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled study with tranexamic acid of bleeding and fibrinolytic activity after primary coronary artery bypass grafting.

Cardiopulmonary bypass is frequently associated with excessive blood loss. Platelet dysfunction is the main cause of non-surgical bleeding after open-heart surgery. We randomized 65 patients in a double-blind fashion to receive tranexamic acid or placebo in order to determine whether antifibrinolytic therapy reduces chest tube drainage. The tranexamic acid group received an intravenous loading dose of 10 mg/kg, before the skin incision, followed by a continuous infusion of 1 mg kg(-1) h(-1) for 5 h. The placebo group received a bolus of normal saline solution and continuous infusion of normal saline for 5 h. Postoperative bleeding and fibrinolytic activity were assessed. Hematologic data, convulsive seizures, allogeneic transfusion, occurrence of myocardial infarction, mortality, allergic reactions, postoperative renal insufficiency, and reopening rate were also evaluated. The placebo group had a greater postoperative blood loss (median (25th to 75th percentile) 12 h after surgery (540 (350-750) vs 300 (250-455) mL, P = 0.001). The placebo group also had greater blood loss 24 h after surgery (800 (520-1050) vs 500 (415-725) mL, P = 0.008). There was a significant increase in plasma D-dimer levels after coronary artery bypass grafting only in patients of the placebo group, whereas no significant changes were observed in the group treated with tranexamic acid. The D-dimer levels were 1057 (1025-1100) microg/L in the placebo group and 520 (435-837) microg/L in the tranexamic acid group (P = 0.01). We conclude that tranexamic acid effectively reduces postoperative bleeding and fibrinolysis in patients undergoing first-time coronary artery bypass grafting compared to placebo.

Antifibrinolytic Agents↗
PubMed2002

An economic analysis of amiodarone versus placebo for the prevention of atrial fibrillation after open heart surgery.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To determine if the additional costs of oral amiodarone in patients undergoing open heart surgery would be offset by reductions in the frequency of atrial fibrillation. DESIGN: Piggyback cost analysis of the data from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: Urban academic hospital. PATIENTS: Two hundred twenty elderly patients (> or = 60 yrs old) undergoing open heart surgery. INTERVENTION: Hospital costs of open heart surgery in patients given amiodarone for the prevention of atrial fibrillation and in prespecified subgroups were compared with those for patients given placebo (i.e., standard care with beta-blockers alone). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Total hospital costs incurred were $15,565 +/- $9832 and $16,126 +/- $8043 in the amiodarone and placebo groups, respectively (p=0.12). General ward, intensive care unit, operating room, pharmacy, and costs in all other departments were similar between the groups (p>0.05 for all comparisons). Because costs were similar but amiodarone was more effective than placebo, amiodarone was cost-effective compared with placebo. Amiodarone remained cost-effective compared with placebo regardless of the following subgroup characteristics: rapid or slow loading strategy, no history of atrial fibrillation or heart failure, age older than 70 years, and no tolerance to preoperative beta-blockers. Moreover, in the one-way sensitivity analysis, the findings remained robust to changes in effectiveness and cost of amiodarone. CONCLUSION: Routine prophylaxis with amiodarone is cost-effective compared with placebo. Future studies should examine the cost-effectiveness of selective prophylaxis, and primary cost-effectiveness studies should be conducted to validate these findings.

Aged↗
PubMed1997

Treatment costs and quality of life with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor in patients with antineoplastic therapy-related febrile neutropenia. Results of a randomised placebo-controlled trial.

This study examined the costs of treatment of, and quality of life in, patients with antineoplastic therapy-induced neutropenic fever who were treated with antibacterials, with or without granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF). Patients with haematological malignancies (n = 47) or solid tumours (n = 87) who had severe neutropenia (neutrophil count < 0.5 x 10(9)/L) and fever (> 38.5 degrees C once, or > 38 degrees C twice, in a 12-hour observation period) were randomised to receive subcutaneous GM-CSF 5 micrograms/kg/day (n = 65) or placebo (n = 69) in conjunction with broad-spectrum antibacterials. GM-CSF enhanced neutrophil recovery compared with placebo. Median neutrophil counts at day 4 were 2.9 (range 0 to 25) x 10(9)/L in the GM-CSF arm and 1.3 (range 0 to 9) x 10(9)/L in the placebo group (p < 0.001). No significant difference was observed with regard to median days with neutrophil count < or = 1.0 x 10(9)/L or in time to resolution of fever. Quality-of-life scores in 90 patients demonstrated significant differences in favour of the placebo group. The results for the oncology and haematology patients were similar to the results for the total group. Patients in the GM-CSF and placebo groups had a mean hospital stay of 7.25 and 8.33 days, respectively. Hospital costs were higher for the GM-CSF-treated patients when GM-CSF was included in the price [mean costs: GM-CSF arm $US 5177 vs placebo arm $US 4178 (p < 0.05; 1992 values)]. The haematology patients stayed longer in hospital than the oncology patients, resulting in higher total costs for the former group. These results indicate that GM-CSF does not affect the number of days required for resolution of fever of the hospitalisation period for this patient group, and does not provide a cost-effective contribution to the treatment of these patients. Sensitivity analyses indicate that GM-CSF would produce savings if the duration of hospitalisation with GM-CSF was < or = 76.5% of that in the placebo group.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

Efficacy of granisetron for the treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting in women undergoing breast surgery: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Women undergoing general anaesthesia for breast surgery are especially at risk of experiencing postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). This study was undertaken to assess the efficacy of granisetron, a selective serotonin type 3 receptor antagonist, for the treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting after breast surgery. DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study carried out in a university-affiliated teaching hospital. The study included women who experienced nausea lasting >10 minutes and/or vomiting during the first 3 hours after recovery from anaesthesia for breast surgery. Patients intravenously received either placebo or granisetron at four different doses (10 microg/kg, 20 microg/kg, 40 microg/kg and 80 microg/kg). Patients were observed for 24 hours after administration of the study drug. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES AND RESULTS: A total of 100 women were enrolled in this study. Complete control of established PONV, defined as no emetic symptoms and no need for a rescue antiemetic, was observed in 50% of women receiving granisetron 10 microg/kg (p = 0.5 vs placebo), 85% of women receiving granisetron 20 microg/kg (p = 0.009 vs placebo), 90% of women receiving granisetron 40 microg/kg (p = 0.003 vs placebo), and 85% of women receiving granisetron 80 microg/kg (p = 0.009 vs placebo), compared with 45% of placebo recipients. The efficacies of granisetron 20 microg/kg, granisetron 40 microg/kg, and granisetron 80 microg/kg for the treatment of established PONV were superior to that of granisetron 10 microg/kg (all p < 0.05). No serious adverse effects were observed in any group. CONCLUSION: The minimum effective dose of granisetron for the treatment of PONV in women undergoing breast surgery was 20 microg/kg. Increasing the granisetron dose to 80 microg/kg provided no further benefit.

Antiemetics↗
PubMed2002

Acetyl-L-carnitine (levacecarnine) in the treatment of diabetic neuropathy. A long-term, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and tolerability of acetyl-L-carnitine (levacecarnine; LAC) versus placebo in the treatment of diabetic neuropathy, mainly by evaluating the effects of treatment on electrophysiological parameters and pain symptoms. DESIGN: This was a multicentre (n = 20), randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. PATIENTS: 333 patients meeting clinical and/or neurophysiological criteria for diabetic neuropathy were enrolled. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomised to treatment with LAC or placebo. LAC (or placebo) was started intramuscularly at a dosage of 1000 mg/day for 10 days and continued orally at a dosage of 2000 mg/day for the remainder of the study (355 days). MAIN OUTCOME PARAMETERS AND RESULTS: The main efficacy parameter was the effect of treatment on 6- and 12-month changes from baseline in nerve conduction velocity (NCV) and amplitude in the sensory (ulnar, sural and median) and motor (median, ulnar and peroneal) nerves. The effect of treatment on pain was also evaluated by means of a visual analogue scale (VAS). Among the 294 patients with impaired electrophysiological parameters at baseline, those treated with LAC showed a statistically significant improvement in mean NCV and amplitude compared with placebo (p < 0.01). The greatest changes in NCV (at 12 months) were observed in the sensory sural nerve (7 m/sec in the LAC group vs +1.0 m/sec in the placebo group), sensory ulnar nerve (+2.9 vs +0.1 m/sec, respectively) and motor peroneal nerve (+2.7 vs -0.2 m/sec), whereas the greatest changes in amplitude were recorded in the motor peroneal nerve (+2.2 vs +0.1 mV). After 12 months of treatment, mean VAS scores for pain were significantly reduced from baseline by 39% in LAC-treated patients (p < 0.0 vs baseline) compared with 8% in placebo recipients. LAC was well tolerated over the study period. CONCLUSIONS: LAC was effective and well tolerated in improving neurophysiological parameters and in reducing pain over a 1-year period. LAC is, therefore, a promising treatment option in patients with diabetic neuropathy.

Acetylcarnitine↗
PubMed2004

Improvement of cutaneous microcirculation and oxygen supply in patients with chronic venous insufficiency by orally administered extract of red vine leaves AS 195: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of the red vine leaf extract AS 195 on cutaneous microvascular blood flow, transcutaneous oxygen pressure (tcpO2), and leg oedema in patients with chronic venous insufficiency (CVI). DESIGN AND PATIENTS: The study was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial for which 129 men and women, aged > or =18 years, with CVI stage I or II were screened. Seventy-one fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were randomised. INTERVENTIONS: A total of 71 patients were divided into two groups. The first group (n = 36) received AS 195 360mg once daily during a first 6-week treatment period, followed by a 4-week placebo washout period and then placebo during the second 6-week treatment period. The second group (n = 35) started with placebo and received AS 195 360mg after the placebo washout. The cutaneous microvascular blood flow in the malleolar region was measured using a newly developed laser Doppler device. TcpO2 was measured using a solid-state electrode. RESULTS: After 6 weeks, patients in the AS 195 group had increased microvascular blood flow values (+241.8 +/- 18.7 arbitrary units [AU] versus a decrease of -41.0 +/- 18.7AU in the placebo group; p < 0.0001). Oxygen increased to 1.35 +/- 0.97mm Hg (placebo: decrease of -7.27 +/- 0.97mm Hg; p < 0.0001). After 6 weeks of treatment the leg circumference was decreased (ankle level: by -0.39 +/- 0.09cm versus +0.29 +/- 0.09cm; p < 0.0001; calf level: by -0.54 +/- 0.05cm versus +0.14 +/- 0.05cm; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: The administration of AS 195 improved objective symptoms of CVI and may prevent CVI deterioration.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Dexfenfluramine in obese Chinese NIDDM patients. A placebo-controlled investigation of the effects on body weight, glycemic control, and cardiovascular risk factors.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the safety, efficacy, and metabolic effects of dexfenfluramine in obese Chinese NIDDM patients. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Thirty-two patients, mean (+/- SD) body weight 76.2 +/- 8.5 kg with corresponding BMI 31.1 +/- 2.1 kg/m2, were randomized into a two-phase study, after a 2-week single-blind run-in period on placebo. Phase 1 was a randomized 3-month double-blind placebo-controlled trial during which either dexfenfluramine or placebo was added to the existing treatment regimens of diet plus or minus sulfonylureas without metformin. Phase 2 was a further 3-month single-blind trial during which the placebo group was given dexfenfluramine without patients' knowledge of changing to active medication, while the active group continued with dexfenfluramine. Body weight, glycemic control, blood pressure, lipids, and quality of life were assessed before and at 3 and 6 months after randomization. A total of 27 patients were also followed for an additional period of 6-12 months (215 +/- 53 days) after dexfenfluramine treatment was withdrawn. RESULTS: During the run-in period, both groups were comparable for all parameters measured. At 3 months, mean changes in BMI were -1.2 +/- 1.0 kg/m2 (dexfenfluramine) vs. -0.1 +/- 0.5 kg/m2 (placebo) (P < 0.001). The mean changes in fasting plasma glucose were -1.14 +/- 0.99 vs. 0.51 +/- 1.34 mmol/l (dexfenfluramine vs. placebo, P = 0.004). HbA(1c) also significantly improved in the dexfenfluramine group (-0.80 +/- 0.53 vs. 0.25 +/- 0.64%, P < 0.001). During the 3-month single-blind dexfenfluramine treatment in the ex-placebo group, there were similar improvements in body weight and glycemic indexes. After cessation of dexfenfluramine therapy at 6 months, significant increases in body weight and glycemic indexes, almost back to the baseline, were observed for both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Dexfenfluramine aids weight loss and improves glycemic control in obese Chinese NIDDM patients over a 3- to 6-month period. These effects are emphasized after withdrawal of treatment and further support the longer-term use of dexfenfluramine for chronic complicated obesity.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Brompheniramine maleate: a double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison with terfenadine for symptoms of allergic rhinitis.

This was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter, parallel study comparing the effectiveness, at recommended doses, of an extended-release formulation of brompheniramine maleate and terfenadine in the treatment of allergic rhinitis. Subjects with symptoms of seasonal and/or perennial allergic rhinitis received brompheniramine 12 mg (n = 106), 8 mg (n = 105), terfenadine 60 mg (n = 106), or placebo (n = 53) twice daily for 14 days. On treatment days 3, 7, and 14, symptom severity ratings (i.e., rhinorrhea, sneezing, nasal congestion, itchy nose, eyes or throat, excessive tearing, postnasal drip) were completed by the physician; subjects and physicians each completed a global efficacy evaluation. Brompheniramine 12 mg and 8 mg and terfenadine were more effective than placebo (p < or = 0.05) on the physicians' global: brompheniramine 12 mg was more effective than terfenadine (p < or = 0.05) on days 7 and 14 and brompheniramine 8 mg on day 3. On the subjects' global evaluation, brompheniramine 12 mg and 8 mg and terfenadine were more effective than placebo (p < or = 0.05); brompheniramine 12 mg was more effective than terfenadine (p < or = 0.05) on days 7 and 14 and brompheniramine 8 mg on day 3. In general, brompheniramine 8 mg was comparable to terfenadine. On days 3 and 7, the total symptom and total nasal symptom severity scores for subjects receiving brompheniramine 12 mg were significantly more improved than for placebo (p < 0.05); terfenadine was not different from placebo; brompheniramine 12 mg was significantly better than terfenadine on day 7 (p < 0.05) for reducing total symptom severity and on days 3, 7, and 14 for reducing total nasal symptom severity. Adverse experiences were reported by 155 (41.9%) of the 370 subjects enrolled in the study. The overall rate of adverse experiences in the brompheniramine 12 mg treatment group (57.5%) was significantly greater (p < 0.05) than for brompheniramine 8 mg (38.1%), terfenadine (31.1%), and placebo (39.6%). In conclusion, an extended-release formulation of brompheniramine 12 mg or 8 mg bid alleviates allergic rhinitis symptoms and brompheniramine 12 mg provides significantly better relief of these symptoms than terfenadine 60 mg bid.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2002

Comparison of static and placebo magnets on resting forearm blood flow in young, healthy men.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover design. OBJECTIVES: To examine the effects of static magnets on resting forearm blood flow and vascular resistance. BACKGROUND: Despite little scientific evidence indicating benefits of wearing static magnets, recent reports have indicated a dramatic increase in the usage of magnets to treat a variety of medical conditions. Magnet manufacturers have proposed that one mechanism for pain reduction involves magnet-related blood flow alterations to the affected area. METHODS AND MEASURES: Twenty young, healthy men (mean age +/- SD = 25 +/- 2 years) wore commercially available static magnets and placebos for 30 minutes on 2 separate occasions. Resting forearm blood flow was assessed in triplicate at minutes 10, 20, and 30, using venous occlusion plethysmography. Forearm vascular resistance was estimated by dividing mean arterial pressure by blood flow. RESULTS: The average blood flow over the 30-minute measurement period was not significantly different between the magnet and placebo sessions (mean +/- SD for magnet session = 1.40 +/- 0.63 ml blood x 100 ml tissue(-1) x min(-1); mean +/- SD for placebo session = 1.36 +/- 0.46 ml blood x 100 ml tissue(-1) x min(-1); P = 0.66). Blood flow measurements at minutes 10, 20, and 30 were also not significantly different between the magnet and placebo sessions, and forearm vascular resistance was not different between the magnet and placebo sessions at any time (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Exposure to static magnets for up to 30 minutes had the same effect on resting forearm blood flow and vascular resistance as placebo magnets. These data suggest that static magnets do not result in significant alterations in resting blood flow.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Aripiprazole for the prevention of relapse in stabilized patients with chronic schizophrenia: a placebo-controlled 26-week study.

BACKGROUND: Aripiprazole is a novel antipsychotic for the management of schizophrenia. This study investigated the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of aripiprazole in preventing relapse in adult chronic schizophrenia patients experiencing ongoing stable symptomatology. METHOD: In this 26-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multi-center study, 310 patients with DSM-IV schizophrenia (mean Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale [PANSS] total score = 82) were randomly assigned to receive a once-daily fixed dose of aripiprazole, 15 mg, or placebo. The primary outcome measure was time to relapse following randomization. Secondary objectives were to assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of aripiprazole, 15 mg, compared with placebo, in the study population. The study was conducted between Dec. 21, 2000, and Aug. 20, 2001. RESULTS: The time to relapse following randomization was significantly (p < .001) longer for aripiprazole compared with placebo. More patients relapsed with placebo (N = 85; 57%) than aripiprazole (N = 50; 34%); the relative risk of relapse for the aripiprazole group was 0.59 (p < .001). Aripiprazole was significantly superior to placebo from baseline to endpoint in PANSS total, PANSS positive, PANSS-derived Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, and Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness scale (CGI-S) scores and demonstrated significantly better mean Clinical Global Impressions-Global Improvement scale scores (p < or = .01 for all comparisons except CGI-S: .01 < p < or = .05). Aripiprazole was well tolerated, with no evidence of marked sedation and no evidence of hyperprolactinemia or prolonged heart rate-corrected QT interval (QTc). Extrapyramidal symptoms were comparable in the aripiprazole and placebo groups. Modest mean weight loss at endpoint was evident in both groups. CONCLUSION: Aripiprazole, 15 mg once daily, is an effective, well-tolerated treatment for prevention of relapse in patients with chronic, stable schizophrenia.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

The safety and tolerability of duloxetine compared with paroxetine and placebo: a pooled analysis of 4 clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: To compare the safety and tolerability of duloxetine with paroxetine and placebo in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). METHOD: Data from four 8-week randomized, double-blind, placebo- and paroxetine-controlled studies of duloxetine for MDD (DSM-IV criteria) were pooled to compare the safety and tolerability of duloxetine 40 to 120 mg/day with paroxetine 20 mg q.d. Two of the 4 trials included a 26-week extension. RESULTS: The pooled database included 1466 patients (duloxetine, N = 736; paroxetine, N = 359; placebo, N = 371). No deaths occurred in the acute phase trials. Discontinuation rates for adverse events did not differ significantly for duloxetine, 8.0%, and paroxetine, 6.1%. Nausea was the most frequent treatment-emergent adverse event for duloxetine (duloxetine, 14.4%; paroxetine, 12.0%; placebo, 3.8%). Blood pressure and corrected QT (QTc) interval changes were modest and did not differ significantly for the 3 groups. Mean heart rate increased slightly in the duloxetine group, 1.0 beat/minute, and did differ significantly (p < .001) from that in the paroxetine group, but the change is of doubtful importance. Mean changes in laboratory analytes remained within the reference range. Emergent sexual dysfunction was significantly greater among duloxetine- and paroxetine-treated patients than placebo-treated patients (p = .007 vs. duloxetine and p < .001 vs. paroxetine); however, it was significantly lower in duloxetine-treated patients than in paroxetine-treated patients (46.4% vs. 61.4%; p = .015). During the extension phase, weight gain (≥ 7% of initial body weight) was greater in both active-treatment groups than in the placebo group (duloxetine, 10.8%; paroxetine, 13.8%; placebo, 3.1%), but the active-treatment groups did not differ. CONCLUSIONS: Duloxetine is safe and well tolerated in patients with MDD, with safety and tolerability comparable to that of paroxetine.

Journal Article↗