Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “REPRESSION”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,261 records · Page 70Linked to original sources

Transforming ability of Gag-Myc fusion proteins correlates with Gag-Myc protein stability and transcriptional repression.

Avian retroviruses that have transduced c-myc are useful tools to study the conditions necessary for cellular transformation. FH3, one such retrovirus which encodes a Gag-Myc fusion protein, is not transforming in quail embryonic fibroblasts, but a late variant of FH3 that arose after passaging FH3-infected cells is transforming. Mutational analysis of FH3 revealed that the presence of a portion of the retroviral protease in FH3 inhibited transformation and that this inhibition was transferable to a more highly transforming retrovirus, MC29. Transforming and non-transforming FH3-derived and MC29-derived Gag-Myc proteins were used to further explore characteristics of Myc necessary for transformation. Gag-Myc proteins which were transforming were found to be the most stable in the cell. To distinguish whether transactivation and/or repression is correlated to transformation, the various Gag-Myc fusion proteins were tested for their ability to activate or repress c-Myc targets. Results indicated that a correlation exists between transforming Gag-Myc proteins and their ability to repress, whereas all Gag-Myc proteins could transactivate, regardless of their ability to transform. Taken together, these results suggest that protein stabilization of Myc and repression of target genes by Myc are important for cellular transformation.

Animals↗

Several regions of p53 are involved in repression of RNA polymerase III transcription.

The tumour suppressor p53 has been shown to regulate RNA polymerase (pol) III transcription both in vitro and in vivo. We have characterized the regions of p53 that contribute to this effect. Repression of pol III transcription in vivo does not require residues 13-19 near the N-terminus of p53 that are highly conserved through evolution. However, amino acids 22 and 23 in the adjacent transactivation domain do contribute to the inhibition of pol III activity. Deletions within the central DNA-binding core domain (residues 102-292) of p53 can entirely abolish the repression function in these assays, despite the fact that pol III templates contain no recognized p53 binding site. Deletion or substitution within the C-terminal domain of p53 can also compromise its ability to repress pol III activity in vitro and in transfected cells. These observations reveal that repression of pol III transcription is a complex function involving multiple regions of p53 extending throughout much of the protein.

Chloramphenicol O-Acetyltransferase↗

Repression of IRF-4 target genes in human T cell leukemia virus-1 infection.

The human T cell leukemia/lymphotropic virus-1 (HTLV-I) is the etiologic agent of adult T cell leukemia (ATL), an aggressive and fatal leukemia of CD4+ T lymphocytes. Interferon regulatory factor-4 (IRF-4) was shown previously to be constitutively expressed in T cells infected with HTLV-1. In this study, we investigated the role of IRF-4 gene regulation in the context of HTLV-1 infection using gene array technology and IRF-4 expressing T cells. Many potential IRF-4 regulated genes were identified, the vast majority of which were repressed by IRF-4 expression. Cyclin B1, a G2-M checkpoint protein identified as an IRF-4 repressed gene in the array, was further characterized in the context of HTLV-1 infection. All HTLV-1 infected cell lines and ATL patient lymphocytes demonstrated a dramatic decrease in cyclin B1 levels; subsequent analysis of the cyclin B1 promoter identified two sites important in IRF-4 binding and repression of cyclin B1 expression. Furthermore, IRF-4-mediated repression of cyclin B1 led to a significant decrease in CDC2 kinase activity in HTLV-1 infected T cells. IRF-4 expression in HTLV-1 infected T cells also downregulated other genes implicated in the mitotic checkpoint as well as genes involved in actin cytoskeletal rearrangement, DNA repair, apoptosis, metastasis and immune recognition. Several of the identified genes are dysregulated in ATL and may provide important mechanistic information concerning pathways critical to the emergence of ATL.

Base Sequence↗

Repression of TGF-beta signaling by the oncogenic protein SKI in human melanomas: consequences for proliferation, survival, and metastasis.

Transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta ) has dual and paradoxical functions as a tumor suppressor and promoter of tumor progression and metastasis. TGF-Ji-mediated growth inhibition is gradually lost during melanoma tumor progression, but there are no measurable defects at the receptor level. Furthermore, melanoma cells release high levels of TGF-beta to the microenvironment, which upon activation induces matrix deposition, angiogenesis, survival, and transition to more aggressive phenotypes. The SKI and SnoN protein family associate with and repress the activity of Smad2, Smad3, and Smad4, three members of the TGF-fl signaling pathway. SKI also facilitates cell-cycle progression by targeting the RB pathway by at least two ways: it directly associates with RB and represses its activity when expressed at high levels, and indirectly, it represses Smad-mediated induction of p21(Waf-1) This results in increased CDK2 activity, RB phosphorylation,and inactivation. Therefore, high levels of SKI result in lesions to the RB pathway in a manner similar to p16 (INK4a) loss. SKI mRNA and protein levels dramatically increase during human melanoma tumor progression. In addition,the SKI protein shifts from nuclear localization in intraepidermal melanoma cells to nuclear and cytoplasmic in invasive and metastatic melanomas. Here, I discuss the basis for repression of intracellular TGF-beta signaling by SKI, some additional activities of this protein, and propose that by disrupting multiple tumor suppressor pathways, SKI functions as a melanoma oncogene.

Animals↗

c-Myc represses the proximal promoters of GADD45a and GADD153 by a post-RNA polymerase II recruitment mechanism.

The c-Myc cellular oncogene has diverse activities, including transformation, proliferation, and apoptosis. These activities are dependent on the ability of c-Myc to regulate gene transcription. c-Myc downregulates the GADD45a and GADD153 (DDTI3) genes that are induced in response to genotoxic stresses and that encode protein products with antiproliferative activities. We show that c-Myc represses the expression of GADD45a and GADD153 in response to thapsigargin, a nongenotoxic stress, as well as other endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress agents. c-Myc represses both the basal expression and the magnitude of ER stress induction of GADD gene transcription. This repression requires the minimal promoter region of GADD45a and GADD153 and is not dependent on the ER stress element or p53-binding sites in the regulatory regions of these genes. Further analysis by chromatin immunoprecipitation shows that c-Myc binds to the minimal promoter region of GADD45a and GADD153 in vivo. c-Myc-associated protein X (Max) is also bound to both GADD gene promoters, whereas c-Myc interacting zinc-finger protein 1 (Miz-1) is bound to the GADD153, but not GADD45a, promoter. RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) is recruited to the GADD gene promoters in the presence and absence of c-Myc, which suggests that c-Myc represses these genes through a post-RNAPII recruitment mechanism.

CCAAT-Enhancer-Binding Proteins↗

Suv39h histone methyltransferases interact with Smads and cooperate in BMP-induced repression.

Smad proteins transduce signals from transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) superfamily ligands to regulate the expression of target genes. In order to identify novel partners of Smad proteins in transcriptional regulation, we performed a two-hybrid screen using Smad5, a protein that is activated predominantly by bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signaling. We identified an interaction between Smad5 and suppressor of variegation 3-9 homolog 2 (Suv39h2), a chromatin modifier enzyme. Suv39h proteins are histone methyltransferases that methylate histone H3 on lysine 9, resulting in transcriptional repression or silencing of target genes. Biochemical studies in mammalian cells demonstrated that Smad5 binds to both known mammalian isoforms of Suv39h proteins, and that Smad proteins activated by the TGF-beta signaling pathway, Smad2 and Smad3, do not bind with significant affinity. Functional studies using the muscle creatine kinase (MCK) promoter, which is suppressed by BMP signaling, demonstrate that Suv39h proteins and Smads cooperate to repress promoter activity. These data suggest a model where association of Smad proteins with Suv39h methyltransferases can repress or silence genes involved in developmental processes, and argues that inefficient gene repression may result in the alteration of the differentiated phenotype. Thus, examination of the Smad-Suv interaction may provide insight into the mechanism of phenotypic determination mediated by BMP signaling.

Animals↗

Transcriptional repression of MMP-1 by p21SNFT and reduced in vitro invasiveness of hepatocarcinoma cells.

p21SNFT (21 kDa small nuclear factor isolated from T cells) is a human basic leucine zipper transcription factor that can repress AP-1-mediated transcription. We show here that overexpression of p21SNFT in HepG2 cells leads to repression of matrix metalloproteinase-1 by 70-80%. p21SNFT interacted with Jun at the matrix metalloproteinase-1 promoter -88 Ets/AP-1 enhancer element, where Jun is known to activate transcription via interaction with Fos and Ets proteins. When p21SNFT/Jun dimers bound the element in the presence of Ets, DNA was protected differently than when Fos was paired with Jun. The data suggest a difference in overall conformation between p21SNFT-containing and Fos-containing complexes that may be involved in the repression of matrix metalloproteinase-1 by p21SNFT. Overexpression of p21SNFT led to a reduction in invasiveness of HepG2 cells through type I collagen and reconstituted basement membrane, an effect similar to that obtained via direct immunodepletion of matrix metalloproteinase-1. The results indicate that the mechanism of repression of matrix metalloproteinase-1 by p21SNFT may be exploited in inhibiting pathological matrix remodeling during cancer progression in vivo.

Base Sequence↗

Tumor suppressor p53 represses transcription of RECQ4 helicase.

RECQ4 is a member of the RecQ helicase family, which has been implicated in the regulation of DNA replication, recombination and repair. p53 modulates the functions of RecQ helicases including BLM and WRN. In this study, we demonstrate that p53 can regulate the transcription of RECQ4. Using nontransformed, immortalized normal human fibroblasts, we show that p53-dependent downregulation of RECQ4 expression occurred in G1-arrested cells, both in the absence or presence of exogenous DNA damage. Wild-type p53 (but not the tumor-derived mutant forms) repressed RECQ4 promoter activity. The camptothecin or etoposide-dependent p53-mediated repression was attenuated by trichostatin A (TSA), an inhibitor of histone deacetylases (HDACs). Repression of the RECQ4 promoter was accompanied with an increased accumulation of HDAC1, and the loss of SP1 and p53 binding to the promoter. The simultaneous formation of a camptothecin-dependent p53-SP1 complex indicated its occurrence outside of the RECQ4 promoter. These data suggest that p53-mediated repression of RECQ4 transcription during DNA damage results from the modulation of the promoter occupancy of transcription activators and repressors.

Cells, Cultured↗

Hepatitis B virus X protein represses E-cadherin expression via activation of DNA methyltransferase 1.

E-cadherin is a key cell adhesion molecule implicated as a tumor suppressor, which is frequently altered in hepatocellular carcinoma, especially in hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related tumors. Here, we report that HBV X protein (HBx) represses E-cadherin expression at the transcription level. Based on the differential effects of HBx natural variants, we determined that Lys-130 in the transactivation domain of HBx is critical for the E-cadherin repression. The repression effect of HBx was abolished after treatment with DNA methyltransferase inhibitor, 5'-Aza-2'dC. In addition, methylation-specific PCR analysis revealed that the CpG island 1 of E-cadherin promoter is hypermethylated by HBx. Furthermore, HBx induces DNA methyltransferase 1 expression by stimulating its transcription. Therefore, we conclude that HBx represses E-cadherin expression by inducing methylation-mediated promoter inactivation. The reduced E-cadherin expression results in dramatic morphological changes of the HBx-expressing cells. In addition, HBx-expressing cells aggregate poorly in suspension culture, reflecting their altered intercellular interactions. The biological significance was further demonstrated by the increased collagen invasion ability of HBx-expressing cells. Therefore, the present study suggests that HBx plays a role during hepatocellular carcinogenesis by favoring cell detachment from the surrounding cells and migration outside of the primary tumor site.

Base Sequence↗

BCL11B functionally associates with the NuRD complex in T lymphocytes to repress targeted promoter.

BCL11 genes play crucial roles in lymphopoiesis and have been associated with hematopoietic malignancies. Specifically, disruption of the BCL11B (B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia/lymphoma 11B) locus is linked to T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia, and the loss of heterozygosity in mice results in T-cell lymphoma. BCL11 proteins are related C2H2 zinc-finger transcription factors that act as transcriptional repressors. Here, we demonstrate the association of the endogenous BCL11B with the nucleosome remodeling and histone deacetylase (NuRD) complex, one of the major transcriptional corepressor complexes in mammalian cells. BCL11B complexes from T lymphocytes possess trichostatin A-sensitive histone deacetylase activity, confirming the functionality of the complexes. Analysis of the BCL11B-NuRD association demonstrated that BCL11B directly interacted with the metastasis-associated proteins MTA1 and MTA2 through the amino-terminal region. We provide evidence for the functional requirement of MTA1 in transcriptional repression mediated by BCL11B through the following: (1) overexpression of MTA1 enhanced the transcriptional repression mediated by BCL11B, (2) knockdown of MTA1 expression by small interfering RNA inhibited BCL11B transcriptional repression activity and (3) MTA1 was specifically recruited to a BCL11B targeted promoter. Taken together, these data support the hypothesis that the NuRD complex mediates transcriptional repression function of BCL11B.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

STAT5 represses BCL6 expression by binding to a regulatory region frequently mutated in lymphomas.

Deregulated expression of BCL6 is a pathogenic event in many lymphomas. BCL6 blocks cellular differentiation by repressing transcription of its target genes, and this may promote tumorigenesis. Conversely, the transcription factor signal transducers and activators of transcription (STAT)5 promotes differentiation in many systems. STAT5 upregulates a number of genes repressed by BCL6, raising the possibility that STAT5 and BCL6 have opposing roles in transcriptional regulation. Therefore, we sought to determine the effects of STAT5 activation on BCL6 expression and function. We found that activation of STAT5 downregulates BCL6 expression in B-lymphoma cells and other hematopoietic cell lines. We identified two potential STAT-binding regions in the first exon and first intron of BCL6 that fell within regions of high inter-species homology, suggesting conservation of regulatory function. STAT5 can bind inducibly and regulate transcription at one of these regions, identifying BCL6 as a STAT5 target gene. Additionally, STAT5-mediated downregulation of BCL6 results in loss of BCL6 repression of its target genes, confirming that STAT5 is a negative regulator of BCL6 function. The STAT5 responsive region of the BCL6 gene is mutated frequently in B-cell lymphomas, suggesting that loss of the repressive effects of STAT5 on BCL6 might contribute to the pathogenesis of these cancers.

Binding Sites↗

Hypoxic repression of STAT1 and its downstream genes by a pVHL/HIF-1 target DEC1/STRA13.

DEC1/STRA13 is a bHLH type transcriptional regulator involved with immune regulation, hypoxia response and carcinogenesis. We recently demonstrated that STRA13 interacts with STAT3 in the transcriptional activation of STAT-dependent promoters. Here, we pursue STRA13 involvement in the JAK/STAT pathway by studying its role in STAT1 expression. First, we showed that VHL deficiency or HIF-1 activation resulted in the repression of endogenous STAT1 mediated by STRA13. We then characterized the STAT1 proximal promoter to assess its response to STRA13 by transient coexpression in a luciferase reporter assay. Using sequential truncation and site-directed mutagenesis of the STAT1 promoter with STRA13 deletion constructs, we showed that the STRA13 C-terminal trans-activation domain, which is known to bind HDAC1, mostly determines the repressive activity. Involvement of HDAC activity in STAT1 regulation was validated by TSA inhibition and chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay. Thus, we demonstrate that STRA13-mediated repression of STAT1 transcription utilizes an HDAC1-dependent mechanism. Furthermore, we show that targets of unphosphorylated STAT1, such as antigen presenting genes and CASP1, are also repressed by hypoxia possibly through the same STRA13-mediated mechanism. Thus, the newly discovered link between HIF-1 and STAT1 reveals a previously unknown role of STRA13 in hypoxia and carcinogenesis.

Amino Acid Motifs↗

STAT1-independent inhibition of cyclooxygenase-2 expression by IFNgamma; a common pathway of IFNgamma-mediated gene repression but not gene activation.

Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), the rate-limiting enzyme in the synthesis of prostaglandins, promotes the development of colorectal cancer, and is a key molecular target of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, compounds that reduce the relative risk of developing colon cancer. In this study, we showed that interferon gamma (IFNgamma) inhibits the expression of COX-2 protein in intestinal epithelial cells (IECs) through a pathway that requires Janus-activated kinase (JAK) activity. In contrast, we demonstrated that transcriptional inhibition of COX-2 by IFNbeta or IFNgamma occurs in cells with silenced signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 (STAT1) expression and that IFNs retained the ability to inhibit COX-2 transcription in cells with activated RasV12, in which IFNgamma failed to induce STAT1. Thus, unlike the activity of JAK, STAT1 is not required for the inhibition of COX-2 expression by IFNgamma. In contrast to COX-2, the activation of genes in response to IFNgamma, such as interferon regulatory factor-1, was severely impaired by both STAT1 silencing and by constitutive Ras signaling. To determine whether there is a general differential requirement for STAT1 in gene activation and gene repression in response to IFNgamma in intestinal cells, we performed genome-wide analysis of IFNgamma target genes in an IEC line in which STAT1 expression was silenced by small interfering RNA. The results confirmed that the activation of the majority of genes by IFNgamma required STAT1. In contrast, the repression of several genes, as we showed for COX-2 specifically, was largely unaffected in cells with silenced STAT1. Our results therefore demonstrate that in general gene activation by IFNgamma is more sensitive to STAT1 deficiency than gene repression, and suggest that IFNgamma activates and represses gene expression via distinct pathways that can be distinguished, at least in part, by their requirement for STAT1.

Cells, Cultured↗

Cooperative interaction between ETS1 and GFI1 transcription factors in the repression of Bax gene expression.

The proto-oncoproteins ETS1 and growth factor independent-1 (GFI1) are implicated in cell growth and differentiation in various types of cells, and their deregulated expression is involved in malignant transformation. Here, we report that ETS1 and GFI1 interact and affect gene expression through their cross-talk. Co-immunoprecipitation analyses and glutathione-S-transferase pull-down assays revealed that ETS1 bound directly to GFI1 via its Ets domain, and GFI1 bound to ETS1 via its zinc-finger domain. Luciferase (Luc) assays using artificial reporters showed that GFI1 repressed ETS1-mediated transcriptional activation and ETS1 repressed GFI1-mediated transcriptional activation, in a dose-dependent manner. However, in the Bax promoter where the Ets- and Gfi-binding sites (EBS and GBS) are adjacent, ETS1 and GFI1 cooperatively reduced activation. Site-directed mutagenesis on the EBS and GBS of the Bax promoter showed that both binding sites were necessary for full repression. Chromatin immunoprecipitation analyses confirmed that an ETS1-GFI1 complex formed on the Bax promoter even when either EBS or GBS was mutated. Introduction of small interfering RNA against ETS1 and/or GFI1 enhanced endogenous Bax gene expression. Our results suggest that the interaction between ETS1 and GFI1 facilitates their binding to specific sites on the Bax promoter and represses Bax expression in vivo.

Binding Sites↗

Rgt1, a glucose sensing transcription factor, is required for transcriptional repression of the HXK2 gene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Expression of HXK2, a gene encoding a Saccharomyces cerevisiae bifunctional protein with catalytic and regulatory functions, is controlled by glucose availability, being activated in the presence of glucose and inhibited when the levels of the sugar are low. In the present study, we identified Rgt1 as a transcription factor that, together with the Med8 protein, is essential for repression of the HXK2 gene in the absence of glucose. Rgt1 represses HXK2 expression by binding specifically to the motif (CGGAAAA) located at -395 bp relative to the ATG translation start codon in the HXK2 promoter. Disruption of the RGT1 gene causes an 18-fold increase in the level of HXK2 transcript in the absence of glucose. Rgt1 binds to the RGT1 element of HXK2 promoter in a glucose-dependent manner, and the repression of target gene depends on binding of Rgt1 to DNA. The physiological significance of the connection between two glucose-signalling pathways, the Snf3/Rgt2 that causes glucose induction and the Mig1/Hxk2 that causes glucose repression, was also analysed.

DNA-Binding Proteins↗

Carbon catabolite repression of xylanase I (xyn1) gene expression in Trichoderma reesei.

The filamentous fungus Trichoderma reesei forms two specific, xylan-inducible xylanases encoded by xyn1 and xyn2 to degrade the beta-1,4-D-xylan backbone of hemicelluloses. This enzyme system is formed in the presence of xylan, but not glucose. The molecular basis of the absence of xylanase I formation on glucose was the purpose of this study. Northern blotting of the xyn1 transcript as well as the use of the Escherichia coli hygromycin B phosphotransferase-encoding gene (hph) as a reporter consistently showed that the basal expression of xyn1 was affected by glucose, whereas its induction by xylan remained uninfluenced. The repression of basal xyn1 transcription is mediated by the carbon catabolite repressor protein Cre1, which in vivo binds to two of four consensus sites (5'-SYG-GRG-3') in the xyn1 promoter, which occurred in the form of an inverted repeat. T. reesei strains, bearing a xyn1::hph reporter construct, in which four nucleotides from the middle of the inverted repeat had been removed, expressed hph on glucose at a level comparable to that observed during growth on a carbon catabolite derepressing carbon source. Northern analysis of xyn1 expression in a T. reesei mutant strain (RUT C-30), which contains a truncated, non-functional cre1 gene, also confirmed basal transcription of xyn1. In this strain, xyn1 transcription was still inducible by xylose or xylan to an even higher degree than in the wild-type strain, suggesting that induction overcomes glucose repression at the level of xyn1 expression. Based on these data, we postulate that basal transcription of xyn1 is repressed by glucose and mediated by an inverted repeat of the consensus motif for Cre1-mediated carbon catabolite repression.

Carbon↗

Glucose repression affects ion homeostasis in yeast through the regulation of the stress-activated ENA1 gene.

In this report we show that the ENA1/PMR2A gene is under glucose repression. The SNF1 protein kinase, acting independently from the HOG and calcineurin pathways, is essential to release ENA1 from glucose repression. The transcriptional repressor Ssn6p negatively regulates ENA1 expression and, like other glucose repressible genes, this repression is mediated in part by Mig1p. Deletion of a fragment from the ENA1 promoter that includes two Mig1p consensus binding sites gives a high level of expression in glucose without added salt. We suggest that regulation of ENA1 by the SNF1 pathway could be part of a general mechanism through which yeast cells respond to carbon source starvation by activating protective systems against different types of stress.

Adenosine Triphosphatases↗

Carbon catabolite repression of the Aspergillus nidulans xlnA gene.

Expression of the Aspergillus nidulans 22 kDa endoxylanase gene, xlnA, is controlled by at least three mechanisms: specific induction by xylan or xylose; carbon catabolite repression (CCR); and regulation by ambient pH. Deletion analysis of xlnA upstream sequences has identified two positively acting regions: one that mediates specific induction by xylose; and another that mediates the influence of ambient pH and contains two PacC consensus binding sites. The extreme derepressed mutation creAd30 results in considerable, although not total, loss of xlnA glucose repressibility, indicating a major role for CreA in its CCR. Three consensus CreA binding sites are present upstream of the structural gene. Point mutational analysis using reporter constructs has identified a single site, xlnA.C1, that is responsible for direct CreA repression in vivo. Using the creAd30 derepressed mutant background, our results indicate the existence of indirect repression by CreA.

Aspergillus nidulans↗