Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “FLUOROURACIL”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,261 records · Page 70Linked to original sources
PubMed1997

Five-day infusion fluorouracil plus vinorelbine i.v. in metastatic pretreated breast cancer patients.

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the clinical activity and side effects of a combination chemotherapy consisting of a five-day continuous infusion of fluorouracil and i.v. vinorelbine in metastatic previously treated breast cancer patients. The patient population was represented by 28 women with evaluable disease, previously subjected to chemotherapy, including anthracycline-containing regimens in 89% of patients. Treatment consisted of five-day infusion of 700 mg/m2/day of fluorouracil and vinorelbine, 20 mg/m2 i.v. bolus on day 1 and 6. In the absence of Grade > 3 leukopenia and stomatitis, cycles were repeated every three weeks, for a total of six cycles. Four complete and thirteen partial responses were documented, accounting for a response rate of 61% (95% CI: 40.5-78.5); the clinical efficacy was high even in patients unresponsive to prior anthracycline treatment. The median response duration calculated from the first drug injection was 8 months (range 4-11). Treatment was well tolerated, with 4% Grade 4 stomatitis and 20% Grade 3 leukopenia as the main toxic reactions. This drug combination is active in metastatic previously treated breast cancer patients, is devoid of severe side effects, and warrants further testing.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Mitoxantrone, fluorouracil, and L-folinic acid in anthracycline-pretreated metastatic breast cancer patients.

In this phase II trial we have evaluated the activity and toxicity of a combination regimen containing mitoxantrone, L-leucovorin, and fluorouracil in patients with advanced breast cancer pretreated with anthracyclines. Forty-six patients were included into the study; they received a total of 227 cycles of chemotherapy. Median age was 63 years (range 34-78), median performance status was 80 (range 60-100). Visceral metastases were present in 37 patients, 6 patients had bone involvement only, while 3 patients had soft tissue/lymph node disease. Median number of previous chemotherapy regimens for advanced disease was 2 (range 1-3). Ten patients had anthracycline primary resistance (progressive disease during treatment). Twenty-three patients received mitoxantrone 12 mg/sqm day 1; fluorouracil 370 mg/sqm and L-folinic acid 100 mg/sqm days 1-3 administered every three weeks. Another group of 23 patients were treated with the same regimen using a prolonged 5FU/L-FA schedule (5 days). Two complete responses and 6 partial responses were recorded with the 3-day schedule; 7 partial responses in the 5-day schedule (overall response rate 32.6%, 95% C.I. 19-46%). Two partial responses were observed in patients with anthracycline primary resistance. Median response duration was 9 months (range 3-16). Hematologic toxicity was mild: grade 3-4 leukopenia was recorded in 5 patients, grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia in 3 patients. Grade III-IV stomatitis and diarrhea was recorded in 4 and 5 patients respectively (all receiving the 5-day 5-FU/L-FA schedule). Cardiac toxicity was observed in two cases. This regimen proved active in advanced breast cancer following anthracycline-containing chemotherapy, and the 3-day schedule could be offered to such patients with acceptable toxicity.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil, and gemcitabine: a phase I study.

Gemcitabine is a chemotherapy agent with efficacy in the treatment of lung, pancreas, bladder and breast cancer. It inhibits DNA synthesis by interfering with cytidine triphosphate production and also inhibits the activity of ribonucleotide reductase. Gemcitabine may potentiate fluorouracil's inhibition of thymidylate synthase. This inhibition would be expected to be sequence dependent, occurring only if gemcitabine were administered following fluorouracil (5FU). The combination of leucovorin, 5-FU, and gemcitabine was assessed in this phase I trial. Eligibility requirements included refractory solid tumor malignancy; adequate hematologic, renal and hepatic reserve; no prior therapy with the combination of leucovorin and 5FU, or with gemcitabine; ECOG performance status 0-2, and signed informed consent. Eleven men and nine women were eligible. The median age was 52.5 years and the median performance status was 1. All but three patients had prior chemotherapy. The starting doses were leucovorin 20 mg/m2, 5FU 255 mg/m2 and gemcitabine 600 mg/m2. 5FU and gemcitabine were escalated in tandem to 340 mg/m2 and 800 mg/m2 and thereafter to 425 mg/m2 and 1000 mg/m2, respectively. Gemcitabine administration always followed that of 5FU by 30 minutes. The median number of cycles was 2 (range 1-32). Two patients at the starting dose had disease progression within the first cycle with one death on day 28. One patient with cholangiocarcinoma had a partial response and remained on study for 40 months. There were no other responses. The maximum tolerated dose is leucovorin 20 mg/m2, 5FU 340 mg/m2, and gemcitabine 800 mg/m2. The impact of drug sequence remains undetermined.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Five-day infusion fluorouracil plus vinorelbine in women with breast cancer previously treated with anthracyclines and paclitaxel.

UNLABELLED: The continuous infusion of fluorouracil presents a superior pharmacological profile than its bolus administration, while vinorelbine is a new drug associated with good clinical activity in pretreated metastatic breast cancer. We investigated the combination of this two antitumor drugs with the aim to determine a tolerant and active second-line therapy in metastatic pretreated patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty six patients pretreated with chemotherapy received a median of six cycles [2-11] of fluorouracil, 700 mg/m2 for 5 day-continuous i.v. infusion and vinorelbine, 20 mg/m2 on days 1 and 6, every three weeks. The inclusion and evaluation criteria required measurable disease by conventional clinical and/or instrumental means. FINDINGS: Iatrogenic toxicity in 340 administered cycles was mild: stomatitis = 11% (Grade 3 = 5%), constipation and abdominal pain = 12%, G2 neutropenia = 4%, G1 thrombocytopenia = 0.5%. In nine cases moderate infections occurred and six women experienced catheter related complications. Complete and partial remissions were observed in 12% and 36% of evaluable patients, respectively. In particular major tumor regression was documented in 28% of anthracyclines or taxol unresponsive cases. CONCLUSIONS: This drug combination is active in metastatic pretreated breast cancer patients and devoid of serious iatrogenic toxicity. Although it deserves future optimization, for instance with the inclusion of oral fluoropirimidines, it represents a good choice for second-line or non cross-resistant regimens.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Treatment with cisplatin and fluorouracil alternating with radiation favourably affects prognosis of inoperable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: results of a multivariate analysis on 273 patients.

PURPOSE: The goal of the present analyses is to assess the association between different therapeutic approaches and both the probability of achieving a complete response and the risk of death in patients with stage III-IV, inoperable, squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCC-HN). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between August 1983 and December 1990, 273 patients with stage III-IV, previously untreated, unresectable SCC of the oral cavity, pharynx and larynx, were included into two consecutive randomized multi-institutional trials (HN-7 and HN-8 protocols) coordinated by the National Institute for Cancer Research (NICR) of Genoa. The HN-7 protocol compared neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (four cycles of vinblastine, 6 mg/m2 i.v. followed by bleomycin, 30 IU i.m. six hours later, day 1; methotrexate, 200 mg i.v., day 2; leucovorin, 45 mg orally, day 3) (VBM) followed by standard radiotherapy (70-75 Gy in 7-8 weeks) (55 patients) to alternating chemoradiotherapy based on four cycles of the same chemotherapy alternated with three splits of radiation, 20 Gy each (61 patients). In the HN-8 protocol standard radiotherapy (77 patients) was compared to the same alternating program as the one used in the previous protocol but employing cisplatin, 20 mg/m2/day and fluorouracil, 200 mg/m2/day, bolus, both given for five consecutive days (CF) instead of VBM (80 patients). A single database was created with the patients on the two protocols. Age at diagnosis, gender, site of the primary tumor, size of the primary, nodal involvement, performance status and treatment approach were analyzed by the multiple logistic regression model and the Cox regression method. The analyses were repeated including the treating institutions as a covariate (coordinating center versus others). RESULTS: The multiple logistic regression analysis indicates that treatment (alternating more so than others, regardless of the chemotherapy regimen used) (P = 0.0001) is more likely to be associated with complete response. In addition, size of the primary tumor (P = 0.004), nodal involvement (P = 0.02) and performance status (P = 0.009) are prognostic variables affecting the probability of achieving a complete response. The Cox regression analysis indicates that treatment, performance status, size of the primary tumor, nodal involvement and, marginally, site of the primary tumor, are independent prognostic variables affecting the risk of death. When the radiation-alone therapy is adopted as the reference treatment, the relative risk of death is 0.58 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.40-0.84) for alternating CF and radiation, 0.79 (95% CI 0.53-1.16) for alternating VBM and radiation and 1.30 (95% CI 0.89-1.92) for sequential VBM and radiation. When the treating institution is included in the model, a 34% increased risk of death (P = 0.04) is observed for patients treated outside the coordinating center. CONCLUSION: In our series of patients with advanced, unresectable SCC-HN, treatment with cisplatin and fluorouracil alternating with radiation was associated with a more favourable prognosis. The role of the treating institution in the modulation of the treatment outcomes was also relevant.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

The impact of adding low-dose leucovorin to monthly 5-fluorouracil in advanced colorectal carcinoma: results of a phase III trial. Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK).

PURPOSE: A wide variety of fluorouracil (FU)-plus-leucovorin (LV) dose schedules are in clinical use for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer. Only the monthly low-dose LV-plus-FU regimen, as used by the North Central Cancer Treatment Group, has demonstrated a lasting survival benefit as opposed to FU alone (J Clin Oncol 1989; 7: 1407-1417). The Swiss Cancer Group adopted this regimen for a confirmatory phase III trial but used the same dose-intensity of fluorouracil in both treatment arms. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with inoperable or metastatic colorectal cancer were randomized to receive monthly FU 400 mg/m2/day plus LV 20 mg/m2/day as intravenous push daily for five days, or FU alone. RESULTS: Three hundred nine of the 310 patients randomized were eligible and included in the analysis. The objective response rate for patients with measurable disease was 9% with FU alone and 22% with FU-plus-LV (P = 0.0001). The median progression-free survival was 3.9 versus 6.2 months (P = 0.003) and the overall survival 10 versus 12.4 months (P = 0.02). The major prognostic factors for survival were performance status, weight loss, and disease symptoms. WHO > 2 toxicity, consisting of stomatitis (P = 0.001), diarrhea (P = 0.001), and nausea (P = 0.001), was more pronounced for FU-plus-LV, without fatal events. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest published randomized trial to compare FU-plus-LV to FU alone in advanced colorectal cancer. It confirms the survival benefit obtained from biomodulating monthly FU with low-dose LV. The toxic effects of FU-plus-LV were acceptable to most patients, and they responded well to FU dose reductions. In the absence of an ideal dose-intense FU monotherapy regimen, monthly FU with low-dose LV provides a simple and economical means by which to achieve adequate FU efficacy in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

5-Fluorouracil, interferon-alpha-2b and cisplatin (FAP) for advanced urothelial cancer. A phase II study. Hellenic Co-operative Oncology Group.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of the FAP combination chemotherapy as first-line treatment in advanced urothelial cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-four patients with histologically confirmed advanced urothelial cancer, with measurable disease and without previous chemotherapy entered the study; all 34 are evaluable. The 28 males and 6 females had a median age of 65 (19-75) and a median ECOG performance status of 1 (0-2). Twenty-eight patients had bladder cancer, four had renal pelvic cancer and two ureteral cancer. Thirty patients had transitional cell carcinoma and four mixed, mostly of grade 3. Sites of disease included lymph nodes (18), bladder (9), liver (9), pelvic mass (9), lung (7), etc. The treatment plan was as follows: 5-fluorouracil 500 mg/m2 continuous infusion D1-D5 and D22-D26; interferon-alpha-2b 5 million i.u./m2 D1-D5 followed by 3x/week and then D22-D26; cisplatin 25 mg/m2 D1, D8, D15, D22. Cycles were repeated every 36 days. RESULTS: The median number of cycles administered was 3 (1-6). The relative dose intensities for 5-fluorouracil, interferon and cisplatin were 76%, 71% and 75%, respectively. Twenty-two of 34 patients (65%, 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 46% to 80%) had objective responses, including six complete clinical responses (CR) (18%, 95% CI, 7% to 35%) and 16 partial responses (PR) (47%, 95% CI, 30% to 65%). Three patients had stable disease and seven progressed. Two patients discontinued treatment after the first cycle because of toxicity. The median survival is 15.30 months (1.40-37.60), the median time to progression 11.60 months (4.13-37.60), and the median survival of complete responders 20.75+ months (8+ to 38+). The only significant hematologic toxicity was the grade 3-4 neutropenia in 44%. Non-hematologic toxic effects were unremarkable. CONCLUSION: The FAP combination as first-line chemotherapy is highly active in the treatment of advanced urothelial cancer, and has limited toxicity. Further phase III studies are in progress to compare FAP and M-VAC.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Preliminary results of a phase II study of high-dose radiation therapy and neoadjuvant plus concomitant 5-fluorouracil with CDDP chemotherapy for patients with anal canal cancer: a French cooperative study.

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil-mitomycin C) concomitant with radiotherapy (RT) increases local control and colostomy-free survival in advanced anal canal carcinomas (ACC). The purpose of this prospective trial was to analyse the toxicity of and response to an induction chemotherapy combining 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and CDDP administered concomitantly with irradiation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty patients (24 F/6 M, mean age 60, range 38-74) with an advanced ACC > 40 mm and/or with node involvement were prospectively treated (1 T1, 16 T2, 8 T3, 5 T4, 10 N1, 1 N2, 8 N3) from November 1994 to January 1996. Two induction and two concomitant cycles of 5-FU (800 mg/ m2 D1-4 infusion) and CDDP (80 mg/i.v./m2 at D1) were delivered. RT consisted of 45 Gy (1.8 Gy/fr, 5 fr/w) on pelvis +/- inguinal nodes or 30 Gy (3 Gy/fr, 4 fr/w) by direct perineal field. A boost (15-20 Gy) was delivered six weeks later. RESULTS TOXICITY: one patient died of a pulmonary embolism on D4. The remaining 29 received the entire treatment, with reduced 5-FU doses in 11 patients because of acute toxicity. The RT boost was delayed for one patient (aplasia). In 109 cycles, 3 grade 4 and 17 grade 3 toxicities were observed; there were no toxic deaths. Tumor response: the complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) rates were, respectively, 11% and 61% after induction chemotherapy, 59% and 31% after concomitant radiochemotherapy and 96% and 0% two months after completion of the treatment. No tumor progression was observed. CONCLUSION: the treatment was well tolerated and there was good compliance. After induction chemotherapy, most of the patients were in PR, with some even in CR. After completion of the treatment all but one were in CR. The tumor response and the long term results of 50 patients will be analysed before initiation of a randomised trial is considered.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Treatment of advanced pancreatic carcinoma with a combination of protracted infusional 5-fluorouracil and weekly carboplatin: a Mid-Atlantic Oncology Program Study.

BACKGROUND: Advanced pancreatic cancer is a rapidly fatal disease whose course has been little influenced by chemotherapy. Earlier studies have shown some modest promise for the combination of protracted infusional 5-fluorouracil (PIF) and cisplatin. We sought to evaluate a regimen of possibly lesser toxicity, PIF plus weekly carboplatin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-four patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the pancreas were treated with a regimen of protracted infusional fluorouracil 300 mg/m2/day for 70 days and carboplatin 100 mg/m2/weekly on weeks 1 through 10 of a 12-week cycle. After a two-week rest, cycles were repeated until progression. RESULTS: Median duration on treatment was 82 days (range 4-490 days). Toxicity was mild. Grade 3-4 toxicities were anemia 11%, leukopenia 6%, thrombocytopenia 2%, nausea/ vomiting 7%, diarrhea 9%, mucositis 9%, and renal 2%. Response was evaluable in 47 patients. There were two complete and seven partial responses (17% overall objective response rate among all patients). Stable disease for greater than 12 weeks was seen in 19 patients (40%) and progression in 19 (40%). The median overall survival was 22 weeks (1-99), with 61 weeks median survival in responders (22-99). One-year survival was 13%. CONCLUSIONS: Response and survival results with this regimen are at least equal to the best combination regimens reported, and were obtained with a low overall rate of serious toxicity.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Cisplatin, raltitrexed, levofolinic acid and 5-fluorouracil in locally advanced or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a phase I-II trial of the Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group (SICOG).

BACKGROUND: The combination of cisplatin (CDDP) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) can be regarded as a reference regimen in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Raltitrexed (Tomudex) is a direct and specific thymidilate synthase (TS) inhibitor, which has shown clinical activity against SCCHN in a previous phase I study, when combined with 5-FU and levo-folinic acid (LFA). Preclinical data support the combination of CDDP and raltitrexed. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the combination of cisplatin, raltitrexed. LFA and 5-FU in a phase I-II study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with locally advanced or metastatic SCCHN were treated with a combination of cisplatin at the starting dose of 40 mg/m2. followed by raltitrexed at the starting dose of 2.5 mg/m2 on day 1; levo-folinic acid at fixed dose of 250 mg/m2, followed by 5-fluorouracil at the starting dose of 750 mg/m2 on day 2. Doses of the three cytotoxic agents were alternately escalated up to dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Treatment was recycled every two weeks and given up to a maximum of eight courses; after chemotherapy, patients with locally advanced disease received a locoregional treatment. RESULTS: Forty-five patients were entered into the study. Six dose levels were tested. At CDDP 50 mg/m2, raltitrexed 3 mg/m2, 5-FU 900 mg/m2, four out of six patients showed DLT, which was in all cases grade 4 neutropenia. Therefore, this dose level was defined as maximum tolerated dose (MTD). CDDP 60 mg/m2, raltitrexed 2.5 mg/m2, LFA 250 mg/m2, 5-FU 900 mg/m2 was the dose level recommended for phase II. CDDP, Raltitrexed and 5-FU mean actually delivered dose intensities at the selected dose level were 26, 1.05, and 378 mg/m2/week, respectively. Neutropenia was the main side effect and was observed even at the lowest dose levels. Nonhematologic side effects were mild. Nine complete responses (20%) and twenty-one partial responses (47%) were observed, for an overall response rate of 67% (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 51%-80%), according to intention to treat analysis. Fifteen of fifteen patients (100%) treated at the dose level selected for phase II had an objective response (5 complete responses, 10 partial responses). CONCLUSIONS: The results of our dose escalation clearly demonstrate that it is possible to combine CDDP, raltitrexed, and modulated 5-FU at effective doses, without unexpected toxicities. The response data point to an impressive clinical activity, which will be better defined by an ongoing large phase II study.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Phase II trial combining mitomycin with 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cisplatin in recurrent and metastatic undifferentiated carcinoma of nasopharyngeal type.

BACKGROUND: This phase-II study was conducted to investigate the potential benefit from the addition of mitomycin to a conventional anthracycline-cisplatin- and 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy for recurrent and metastatic undifferentiated carcinoma of nasopharyngeal type (UCNT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between July 1989 and December 1991, 44 consecutive patients (M/F 36/8; median age: 45, range 20-72; performance status (PS) 0: 20 patients, PS 1: 14 patients, PS 2: 10 patients) with recurrent or metastatic UCNT were entered in this study after complete clinical, biological, and radiological pre-therapeutic work-ups. Chemotherapy (FMEP regimen) consisted of 800 mg/m2/day 5-fluorouracil in continuous infusion from day 1 to day 4 combined with 70 mg/m2 epirubicin, 10 mg/m2 mitomycin, and 100 mg/m2 cisplatin on day 1, every four weeks for six cycles. Mitomycin was delivered in cycles 1, 3, and 5 only. Eleven patients had isolated loco-regional recurrences, 12 patients had local recurrences associated with distant metastasis, and 21 patients had metastasis only. Toxicity and response were evaluated according to WHO criteria. TOXICITY: Grade 3-4 neutropenia was observed in 122 of 212 evaluable cycles (57%) and 39 of 44 patients (89%); febrile neutropenia occurred in 16 patients (36%) and 24 cycles (11.3%). Grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia was observed in 27 patients (61%) and 45 cycles (21%), including 27 of 45 cycles (60%) with mitomycin. Grade 3 anemia was noted in 18 patients (40%) and 23 cycles (11%), including 18 of 23 cycles (78%) with mitomycin. Grade 3-4 mucositis occurred in 25 cycles (11%) and 14 patients (32%), mainly in those previously treated with radiation therapy in the head and neck area. There were four treatment-related deaths (9%); three of them neutropenia-related, and one of cardiac toxicity. RESPONSE: Forty-four patients were evaluable for response: There were 23 of 44 objective responses (52%), including six complete responses (13%), and 17 partial responses (38%). Additional radiotherapy was given to 13 patients after documentation of response: Nasopharyngeal tumor + cervical nodes (eight patients) and/or on bone metastasis sites (five patients); mediastinal lymph nodes (one patient). At a median follow-up of 87 months (range 71-100), five patients are alive and in continuous complete remission. The median survival time was 14 months and the median time to progression nine months. CONCLUSION: The regimen under study is active in recurrent/metastatic UCNT, but associated with excessive toxicity.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Primary chemotherapy in operable breast cancer with favorable prognostic factors: a pilot study evaluating the efficacy of a regimen with a low subjective toxic burden containing vinorelbine, 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid (FLN).

BACKGROUND: Biological considerations support the use of primary chemotherapy in operable breast cancer; and despite wide variations of used regimens, clinical studies consistently show a significant tumor response allowing breast conservation in many patients otherwise candidates for mastectomy. We investigated the efficacy and the acceptance of a combination chemotherapy with vinorelbine, 5-fluorouracil and high-dose folinic acid in operable breast cancer with favorable prognostic factors and tested the relationship of hormone receptor status, Ki67,p53, c-erbB2 and bcl-2 with treatment response. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-nine patients (median age 51 years, range 36-71 years), eight with T1, twenty-eight with T2 and two with T3 lesions, were treated with 5-fluorouracil (350 mg/m2, i.v. on day 1 to 3) preceded by folinic acid (100 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1 to 3) and vinorelbine, given on days 1 and 3 at the dose of 20 mg/m2 (FLN regimen). Therapy was administered on an outpatient basis every three weeks. Non responders had surgery after three courses, while complete or partial responders underwent surgery after six courses. All but one were evaluable for response and toxicity. RESULTS: Objective responses were observed in 23 of the 38 evaluable patients (61%; 95% CI: 46%-76%): three complete responses (8%) and 20 partial responses (53%). Fifteen patients (39%) had stable disease, of whom nine (23%) had minor response. None of the patients had disease progression during treatment. Objective responses were significantly associated with no expression of estrogen and/or progesterone receptors and > 50% decrease in Ki67 after induction chemotherapy. Tolerance was excellent and none of the patients experienced grade 2 alopecia. CONCLUSIONS: The 'moderate' efficacy of this regimen might be partially due to the selection of patients with high expression of steroid hormone receptors and low proliferation rate, which have an unfavorable impact on response to this chemotherapy.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Phase II trial of bimonthly leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil and gemcitabine for advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (FOLFUGEM).

BACKGROUND: Gemcitabine alone or 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) according to several schedules are used for palliation of metastatic and locally advanced (LA) pancreatic adenocarcinoma. This study was designed to test the efficacy of the leucovorin 5-FU and gemcitabine combination. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This phase II trial combined a simplified bimonthly LV5FU2 with gemcitabine: leucovorin 400 mg/m2 in a two-hour infusion, followed by 5-fluorouracil 400 mg/m2 bolus and 2 or 3 g/m2 continuous infusion over 46 hours; gemcitabine 1 g/m2 was infused over 30 min on day 3 after 5-FU. Treatment was repeated every two weeks. Gemcitabine dose could be increased (250 mg/m2 every two cycles up to 1500 mg/m2) in the absence of NCI-CTC toxicity > 2. RESULTS: Among the 62 patients included in this study, 22 had LA and 40 had metastatic disease. Objective response rate for the 54 patients with measurable disease was 25.9% (95% confidence interval (CI): 14%-37.8%) and 22.6% (95% CI: 12%-33.2%) in the intent-to-treat population: the clinical benefit rate for the 59 assessable patients was 49.2%. Median progression-free survival and median overall survival were 4.8 and 9 months, respectively, with 32.3% of patients alive at 1 year. The most frequent toxicity (grade 3-4) was neutropenia (56.5%) usually asymptomatic (1.1% febrile neutropenia), but requiring decreases of 5-FU and gemcitabine doses. Unexpected complete alopecia occurred in 97% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Palliative effects, response rate and survival observed in this multicenter study seem to be superior to those obtained with gemcitabine or 5-FU alone, despite a limiting hematological toxicity.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed1991

Comparative effect of 6S, 6R and 6RS leucovorin on methotrexate rescue and on modulation of 5-fluorouracil.

The comparative efficacy of the pure diastereoisomers of leucovorin, the natural (6S) and the unnatural (6R) forms was compared to the racemic form (6RS). A protective effect in methotrexate-treated CCRF-CEM cells was obtained with 6S at concentrations 100-fold higher than those of methotrexate and with 6RS at concentrations 2-fold greater than those of 6S; however, at low concentrations of methotrexate, 6S was more effective than 6RS in preventing the cytotoxicity of methotrexate; on the opposite, 6R exhibited a protective effect at concentrations 10(4) higher than those of methotrexate. On the same cell line, 6S was shown to enhance the cytotoxic effect of 5 Fluorouracil exactly as 6RS while 6R did not exhibit any enhancing effect on cells exposed to 5 Fluorouracil.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed1995

Laevofolinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, cyclophosphamide and escalating doses of epirubicin with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support in locally advanced and/or metastatic breast carcinoma: a phase I-II study of the Southern Italy Oncology Group (GOIM).

Sixty-four consecutive patients with locally advanced (n = 7) or metastatic breast cancer (n = 57), were treated with a combination of laevofolinic acid 100 mg m-2 plus 5-fluorouracil 340 mg m-2 i.v. on days 1-3, cyclophosphamide 600 mg m-2 i.v. on day 1 and epirubicin 90 mg m-2 i.v. on day 1. Epirubicin dose was progressively escalated by 10 mg m-2 per cycle up to 120 mg m-2 in the absence of dose-limiting toxicities. Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) was given subcutaneously in order to prevent neutropenia. Epirubicin dosage could be increased to 100 mg m-2 in 53 patients (87%), to 110 mg m-2 in 31 patients (51%) and to 120 mg m-2 in 18 cases (30%). In most patients the dose-limiting toxicity was represented by myelosuppression. A statistically significant correlation was found between median white blood count (WBC) or absolute neutrophil count (ANC) nadir and epirubicin dose level (P = 0.009; P = 0.008). Moreover, a statistically significant correlation was observed between the number of chemotherapeutic cycles, nadir ANC and WBC and the occurrence of anaemia and thrombocytopenia of increasing severity. These data suggest the occurrence of progressive cumulative bone marrow toxicity. Although patients who reached different epirubicin levels showed differences in mean dose intensity, such differences were not statistically significant. No correlation was found between the increase in dose intensity and type, rate or duration of objective responses. In patients with metastatic breast cancer the overall response rate was 72% (95% CL 66-78%) with a 25% complete response rate. Median duration of response was 10 and 13 months respectively for complete and partial responses. All patients with locally advanced breast cancer had an objective response and underwent radical mastectomy. Projected median survival of the whole series of patients with metastatic breast cancer was 20 + months. These data demonstrate that the combination of 5-fluorouracil with laevofolinic acid, cyclophosphamide and epirubicin is very active against metastatic breast cancer. Use of G-CSF allows epirubicin dosage to be increased up to 120 mg m-2 cycle-1, but its use may be linked to the occurrence of sometimes severe cumulative haematological toxicity.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Efficacy of up-front 5-fluorouracil-epidoxorubicin-cyclophosphamide (FEC) chemotherapy with an increased dose of epidoxorubicin in high-risk breast cancer patients.

The prognosis of patients with stage IIIB breast carcinoma with tumour spread to the apical axillary lymph nodes has hardly improved despite adequate locoregional control and the introduction of systemic adjuvant therapy. A combined modality regimen that includes anthracyclin-based chemotherapy, high-dose chemotherapy with peripheral stem cell support and radiation and hormonal therapy is currently under investigation in this subset of patients. The present study aims to document the efficacy and feasibility of dose-intensive epidoxorubicin in combination with a standard dose of 5-fluorouracil and cyclophosphamide as up-front chemotherapy in this setting. A preoperative chemotherapy regimen consisting of three courses of 5-fluorouracil 500 mg m-2, epidoxorubicin 120 mg m-2 and cyclophosphamide 500 mg m-2 (FE120C) was administered at 21 day intervals without haematopoietic growth factors to 70 patients with apex node-positive disease. All patients were below 60 years of age and had not had prior chemotherapy or radiotherapy. Sixty-six patients were evaluable for clinical response and histopathological examination could be performed in 62 of these. Thirteen patients achieved a clinical complete response (20%). Of these patients, microscopic examination of the mastectomy specimen revealed absence of malignant cells in two and exclusively ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in another two patients. In addition, of the 46 patients (70%) with a clinical partial response, at pathological examination one patient had sclerosis only and four had DCIS. This results in a pathological complete response in three (5%) of all patients and absence of invasive carcinoma in 10%. None of the patients progressed during chemotherapy. The major toxicity was moderate bone marrow suppression with a median white blood count (WBC) nadir of 1800 microliters-1 (range 500-4900). Other toxicities were mild. The full planned dose could be given without delays in 66 of 70 patients FE120C is well tolerated and is highly effective as up-front chemotherapy in relatively young patients with high-risk breast cancer, with a 90% (CI 74-98%) clinical objective response rate.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Epirubicin, cisplatin and continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil (ECF) as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in gastro-oesophageal cancer.

High response rates have been reported in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer with epirubicin, cisplatin and continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil (ECF), including instances of unresectable disease being rendered operable by chemotherapy. We report our experience with ECF as neoadjuvant treatment in gastric and lower oesophageal carcinoma. Twenty-seven patients were treated, of whom ten (37%) had carcinoma of the stomach and 17 (63%) tumours of the lower oesophagus. Histology in the majority of cases, 21 (78%), was adenocarcinoma. Before chemotherapy ten patients (37%) had evidence of initially unresectable locally advanced disease, 16 (59%) had localised disease only and one patient (4%) had a localised primary with a single liver metastasis. Epirubicin (50 mg m(-2) i.v.) and cisplatin (60 mg m(-2) i.v.) were administered every 3 weeks for four cycles together with a continuous 12 week infusion of 5-fluorouracil (200 mg m(-2) day(-1)). Fifteen of 24 assessable patients (62%) had symptomatic improvement on chemotherapy. On combined surgical and/or radiological assessment, 15 of the 27 patients (56%) had objective evidence of tumour response. In all patients assessment for radical surgery was made following chemotherapy. Eighteen patients (67%) proceeded to operation: of these, 11 had complete resection of their disease, one had a histologically incomplete resection and six were found to have unresectable disease. No pathological complete responses were observed. Only one of the ten patients with locally advanced disease achieved complete surgical resection after chemotherapy. At a median follow-up of 36 months from date of diagnosis (range 30-47 months), 19 of the 27 patients (70%) have died. Of 11 patients who had a complete surgical resection, one died post-operatively, three have subsequently relapsed (of whom two have died) and seven remain disease free. Toxicity from treatment was mild and included emesis, myelosuppression, stomatitis and exfoliation. Myelosuppression caused modification of treatment in 14 of 108 chemotherapy cycles (13%). There was one surgical death but no chemotherapy-related deaths. These early results show encouraging symptomatic and objective responses of gastro-oesophageal carcinoma to ECF, but provide no instances of ECF achieving complete pathological response. Only randomised trials can establish the role of neoadjuvant ECF chemotherapy in both initially resectable and unresectable carcinoma of the stomach and lower oesophagus.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Phase II study of continuous infusional 5-fluorouracil with epirubicin and carboplatin (instead of cisplatin) in patients with metastatic/locally advanced breast cancer (infusional ECarboF): a very active and well-tolerated outpatient regimen.

Infusional 5-fluorouracil (F) with cisplatin (C) and epirubicin (E), so-called infusional ECF, is a highly active new schedule against locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. Cisplatin, however, is a major contributor to toxicity and usually requires inpatient treatment. In an attempt to overcome this, we have investigated the effect of substituting carboplatin for cisplatin in our original infusional ECF regimen. Fifty-two patients with metastatic (n = 36) or locally advanced/inflammatory (n = 16) breast cancer were treated with 5-fluorouracil 200 mg m-2 day-1 via a Hickman line using an ambulatory pump for for 6 months, with epirubicin 50 mg m-2 intravenously (i.v.) and carboplatin AUC5 i.v. every 4 weeks, for six courses (infusional ECarboF). The overall response rate (complete plus partial) was 81% (95% CI 67%-90%), with a complete response rate of 17% (95% CI 6-33%) in patients with metastatic disease and 56% (95% CI 30-80%) in patients with locally advanced disease. Median response duration and survival for metastatic disease was 8 and 14 months respectively, and two patients with locally advanced disease have relapsed. These results are very similar to those previously achieved with infusional ECF. Severe grade 3/4 toxicity was low. Infusional ECarboF is a highly active, well-tolerated, outpatient regimen effective against advanced/metastatic breast cancer and now warrants evaluation against conventional chemotherapy in high-risk early breast cancer.

Adult↗