Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Endoscopes”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 1,261 records · Page 70Linked to original sources
PubMed1986

Efficacy of routine fiberoptic endoscope cleaning and disinfection for killing Clostridium difficile.

We have evaluated a standard procedure for cleaning and disinfection of endoscopes for efficacy in eradicating a spore-forming bacterial organism, Clostridium difficile. Initially, 23 endoscopes were cultured for the presence of C. difficile after hanging in storage for at least 24 hours after cleaning and disinfection. All cultures were negative. Subsequently, endoscopes used in 15 patients who had stool cultures positive for C. difficile were cultured immediately after use and again after cleaning and disinfection with 2% alkaline glutaraldehyde for 5 min. Ten of 15 (67%) endoscopes were culture positive for C. difficile immediately after use. After cleaning and disinfection, all of the endoscopes were culture negative except one, which yielded two negative cultures and two cultures showing late growth of rare C. difficile colonies, but contamination could not be ruled out. In vitro exposure to 2% alkaline glutaraldehyde for 5 min resulted in 99% or greater killing of C. difficile spores. We conclude that cleaning and a minimum of 5 min of disinfection with 2% alkaline glutaraldehyde are likely to be effective in killing C. difficile vegetative organisms and spores on endoscopes.

Aldehydes↗
PubMed1987

Endoscopic treatment of biliary duct strictures in sclerosing cholangitis: follow-up assessment of a new therapeutic approach.

Endoscopic sphincterotomy was performed on 10 patients with sclerosing cholangitis to improve biliary tract drainage and to remove bile duct sludge and stones. In addition, Gruentzig-type balloons were placed endoscopically to dilate severe biliary duct strictures in eight of these patients, and endoprostheses were inserted to bridge high grade strictures in three patients. In order to assess the effectiveness of endoscopic treatment, we compared the number of hospitalizations for clinical episodes of cholangitis in this patient group for similar periods of time before and after therapy. Episodes of cholangitis requiring hospitalization decreased from 2.5 +/- 0.4 per patient in the 12 months prior to endoscopic therapy to 0.2 +/- 0.2 episodes per patient in the year following treatment and to 0.33 +/- 0.2 episodes per patient in the additional follow-up period during the second year. Liver function tests have improved significantly over the follow-up period of 19.1 +/- 2.6 months from the time of endoscopic treatment. The serum bilirubin decreased from 6.9 +/- 2.0 mg/dl to 2.7 +/- 1.4 mg/dl; serum alkaline phosphatase decreased from 959 +/- 214 IU to 385 +/- 89 IU; and serum transaminase decreased from 117 +/- 17 IU to 77 +/- 12 IU. Endoscopic treatment appears to be effective in patients with severe sclerosing cholangitis.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Needle knife papillotomy for endoscopic sphincterotomy and cholangiography.

Needle knife papillotomy (NKP) was used to achieve diagnostic endoscopic cholangiography in 39 patients and endoscopic sphincterotomy in 24 patients when conventional endoscopic methods had failed. These patients represent 2.2% (cholangiography) and 4.2% (sphincterotomy) of the total number of patients undergoing these procedures during the same period. Cholangiography was achieved in 37 of 39 patients and sphincterotomy was successfully accomplished in all 24 patients with the assistance of NKP. Complication rates of 2.5% for cholangiography and 12% for sphincterotomy are higher than our own rates for non-NKP-assisted procedures, but the clinical benefits obtained were considered to outweigh these increases or the risks of alternative procedures. NKP is an effective endoscopic tool, allowing endoscopic sphincterotomy to be performed when conventional techniques fail. In addition, in carefully selected cases, NKP is helpful in allowing diagnostic cholangiography when other endoscopic methods fail.

Aged↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Endoscopic sphincterotomy-induced hemorrhage: treatment with multipolar electrocoagulation.

Multipolar electrocoagulation is an effective therapy for patients with endoscopic evidence of active upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage or a non-bleeding visible vessel in an ulcer crater. The use of this therapy for endoscopic sphincterotomy-induced hemorrhage has not been reported previously. This prospective study attempted to assess the efficacy of multipolar electrocoagulation in patients with endoscopic sphincterotomy-induced hemorrhage not responding to conservative and/or other endoscopic measures. Nine patients with moderate or severe bleeding following endoscopic sphincterotomy (one, immediate; eight, delayed 12 to 144 hours) were treated by multipolar electrocoagulation. Prior to endoscopic therapy with multipolar electrocoagulation, the mean hematocrit drop was 14.5% and the mean number of packed red blood cells transfused was 4.8 units. Complete hemostasis was achieved in eight (89%) patients. Re-bleeding occurred in two (25%) and was controlled by a second course of multipolar electrocoagulation in one in whom it was attempted. There were no complications or deaths from multipolar electrocoagulation and surgical therapy was avoided in all nine patients. We recommend proceeding with multipolar electrocoagulation (if possible) after injection therapy and/or balloon tamponade fail to control the hemorrhage and before considering angiographic or surgical intervention.

Balloon Occlusion↗
PubMed1995

Age-related mortality in patients treated endoscopically for bleeding peptic ulcer.

Before the widespread use of endoscopic therapy, mortality from peptic ulcer hemorrhage was highest in elderly patients, and many deaths in this group were a consequence of postoperative complications. Endoscopic intervention greatly reduces the need for an emergency surgical operation, and consequently increasing age may no longer be a risk factor for death from bleeding ulcer. To examine this hypothesis, the outcome of 326 patients undergoing endoscopic therapy for bleeding peptic ulcer was related to age. One hundred two patients were less than 60 years of age (group I), 116 were 61 to 74 years of age (group II), and 108 were older than 75 years (group III). More group III patients were women (p < .0001) and were receiving nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (p < .0001). Associated concomitant diseases were significantly more common in group II and group III patients (p < .001). Forty-nine (45%) group III patients bled from gastric ulcers. More of group II patients were receiving anticoagulant drugs (p < .005). A previous history of peptic ulcer was most common in group I (p < .005), and duodenal ulcer was usually the cause of bleeding in this group. The three groups were well matched in terms of endoscopic stigmata (active bleeding and nonbleeding vessel), admission hemoglobin concentration, the presence of shock, and total transfusion requirements. Endoscopic therapy (injection or heater probe) was possible in 95% of all patients. The need for surgical intervention tended to be lowest in group I (11%, 19%, and 18%), whereas hospital mortality (3%, 6%, and 5%) was very similar. In this large group of unselected patients with major peptic ulcer bleeding, age did not significantly influence response to endoscopic therapy or hospital mortality.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1996

Mycobacteria and glutaraldehyde: is high-level disinfection of endoscopes possible?

BACKGROUND: High-level disinfection of endoscopes has traditionally been undertaken by manual or automatic scope cleaning plus a 10 to 20 minute soak in 2% alkaline glutaraldehyde. Mycobacteria species are less sensitive to glutaraldehyde, and a 45-minute instrument soak has recently been recommended by the manufacturer. Because of concerns over endoscope damage, need for more endoscopes, and perception that the current cleaning method is adequate, we prospectively studied mycobacteria-contaminated endoscopes at various stages of the cleaning process. METHODS: All work was done under a laminar flow hood in a microbiology laboratory. Five gastrointestinal scopes were contaminated with 10(8) colony forming units per milliliter (CFU/mL) of Mycobacterium chelonei, an atypical mycobacterium similar in chemical resistance to Mycobacterium tuberculosis but with less infectious potential. Cultures of the sheath, biopsy channel, and elevator channel were taken at baseline, after manual cleaning, and after 10, 20, and 45 minutes to glutaraldehyde soak both before and after alcohol rinse. RESULTS: Manual cleaning resulted in a mean of 4.7 log10 reduction in viable mycobacterial colonies. Qualitative studies of the external endoscope surface as well as the air-water valve showed no detectable organisms after a 10-minute exposure to alkaline glutaraldehyde. Conventional quantitative culture techniques of the channels demonstrated one endoscope out of five with consistent growth after a 10-minute exposure to glutaraldehyde. Following alcohol treatment, there was no significant colony growth. In contrast, a quantitative membrane filter system showed the presence of at least one mycobacterial colony in four out of five scopes after a 45-minute glutaraldehyde exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Additional studies utilizing a standardized mycobacterial species, inoculum size, and suspension characteristics are recommended to delineate adequate duration of disinfectant exposure time.

1-Propanol↗
PubMed1998

Risk of contamination of sterile biopsy forceps in disinfected endoscopes.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that pathogens may persist within bacterial biofilms in endoscope accessory channels despite high-level disinfection. Breaching the gastrointestinal mucosa with biopsy forceps contaminated at time of passage has the potential to cause cross-infection between patients. METHODS: We studied contamination risk of sterilized biopsy forceps passed through endoscopes after high-level disinfection. For each trial, five video colonoscopes, duodenoscopes, and gastroscopes were used. All endoscopes had been previously processed and stored for 10 or more hours. Sterile biopsy forceps were inserted and retrieved followed by vortexing the tips in 15 mL of soy broth. Under a laminar flow hood, the broth was filtered through a 0.2 microm millipore membrane and plated. Because of minimal bacterial growth resulting from the above, soy broth (> 20 mL) was flushed through two video colonoscopes, duodenoscopes, and gastroscopes on two occasions and collected. The effluent was plated using a sample of 0.1 mL dilution. The remaining suspension was passed through a millipore filter, and the filter was cultured. All cultures were incubated more than 48 hours. RESULTS: Biopsy forceps underwent a total of 24 anaerobic and 75 aerobic cultures. Microbacterial growth occurred on 17 plates: 7 from gastroscopes, 5 from colonoscopes, and 5 from duodenoscopes. Fifteen plates grew staphylococcus for a total of 21 colonies, 1 plate grew 1 colony of propionibacter, 2 plates grew diphtheroids for a total of 4 colonies, and 1 plate grew a single colony of lactobacillus. Cultures from soy broth flushed through the various endoscopes grew on 5 plates: 3 from gastroscopes and 2 from duodenoscopes grew a total of 8 colonies of staphylococcus. CONCLUSIONS: With proper cleaning technique, a 20-minute soak in 2% glutaraldehyde is effective in disinfecting endoscopes. Although current procedures for endoscope disinfection remain imperfect, we found that in this clinical setting, infection of pathogenic gastrointestinal flora is unlikely when using sterile biopsy forceps.

Bacterial Infections↗
PubMed1999

A comparison of transnasal and transoral endoscopy with small-diameter endoscopes in unsedated patients.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare use and tolerance of transnasal and transoral diagnostic endoscopy with small-diameter endoscopes in unsedated patients. METHODS: Patients being seen for diagnostic endoscopy were randomly assigned to have an unsedated transnasal or transoral procedure. Two prototype narrow-diameter endoscopes (a 5.3 mm fiberoptic endoscope and a 5.9 mm videoendoscope) were used. RESULTS: Of 170 patients (64 women and 106 men) enrolled, 86 underwent transoral and 84 underwent transnasal endoscopy. The procedure was successfully completed using the transoral route in 85 of 86 patients and using the transnasal route in 74 of 84 patients (p = 0.004). Sixteen patients experienced mild epistaxis after transnasal endoscopy. The larger videoendoscope, when compared with the fiberoptic endoscope, accounted for a significantly higher proportion of failures (8 of 41 vs. 2 of 43, p = 0.046) and cases of epistaxis (12 of 33 vs. 4 of 41, p = 0.007). The time taken for transoral endoscopy was shorter than the transnasal route (oral mean 13.7 +/- 0.5 minutes, nasal mean 15.2 +/- 0.6 minutes, p = 0.054). There was no difference between the 2 groups with respect to tolerance of the procedure. From the endoscopist's perspective, the only statistically significant difference between the 2 groups was that endoscope insertion was easier by the oral route (p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Unsedated transnasal endoscopy with the videoendoscope was less successful compared with the transnasal fiberoptic instrument or when compared with either instrument passed transorally. Use of the larger diameter videoendoscope also resulted in significantly more epistaxis in the transnasal endoscopy group. Endoscopists find transoral introduction of the endoscope easier; this may reflect their relative unfamiliarity with the nasal route. Once intubation has been successfully achieved for either route, patient tolerance is the same.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Does cholecystectomy after endoscopic sphincterotomy prevent the recurrence of biliary complications?

BACKGROUND: The intact gallbladder after endoscopic sphincterotomy is thought to be a potential risk factor for recurrent biliary complications. The aim of this non-randomized prospective study was to investigate whether cholecystectomy soon after endoscopic sphincterotomy could prevent the recurrence of biliary complications. METHODS: From January 1991 to October 1995, 140 patients with intact gallbladder underwent endoscopic sphincterotomy for clearance of stones in the bile duct. Of the 140 patients, 46 underwent elective cholecystectomy soon after sphincterotomy (group A) and 94 did not (group B). All 140 patients had quantitative cholescintigraphy after normalization of liver function and were followed on a regular basis with liver biochemistry, sonography, and/or computed tomography. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography was also performed if a recurrent biliary problem was suspected. RESULTS: After a median 43 months (range 23 to 80) of follow-up, 5 patients in group A developed bile duct stones whereas 12 patients in group B had recurrent stones; 4 patients in group A versus 6 patients in group B had recurrent biliary symptoms. One patient in group A and 5 patients in group B with recurrent biliary stones were without symptoms. In group B, the age, gender, diameter of the bile duct, preexisting cholelithiasis, abnormal filling of the gallbladder on quantitative cholescintigraphy, and presence of juxtapapillary diverticulum were not found to be the significant factors affecting the recurrence of biliary symptoms or stones. Endoscopic removal of recurrent biliary stones was successful in all patients. Three patients in group B underwent cholecystectomy after abatement of symptoms. CONCLUSION: Elective cholecystectomy after endoscopic sphincterotomy does not reduce the incidence of recurrent biliary complications.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy and intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy in the treatment of cholecysto-choledocholithiasis.

BACKGROUND: A single-stage minimally invasive procedure would be optimal for management of cholecysto-choledocholithiasis. Two alternative strategies are available: management by laparoscopy alone or a combined laparoscopic-endoscopic approach. This study evaluates the results of the latter procedure. METHODS: From June 1993 to September 1997, 1400 patients with symptomatic biliary stone disease were evaluated for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Intraoperative cholangiography was performed on the basis of a preoperative suspicion of bile duct stones; bile duct stone treatment was by intraoperative endoscopic retrograde sphincterotomy. RESULTS: Intraoperative cholangiography was performed because of a preoperative suspicion of a bile duct abnormality in 141 of 1400 patients (10%) undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy because of biliary stone disease. Of those 141 patients, 54 (38.3%) presented with pathologic findings (bile duct stone [52] and papillary stenosis [2]); all 54 underwent intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy. Complete clearance of the ductal stones was achieved in 43 patients (82.7%) by intraoperative sphincterotomy, and in 9 patients by an additional postoperative endoscopic procedure. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy was carried out in all cases. There were no conversions to an open operation. Postoperative course in the uncomplicated cases was comparable to that for laparoscopic cholecystectomy alone. The postoperative complication rate was 5.6% and mortality 1.8%. Mean hospital stay was 3.3 days (range 2 to 16). At a mean 38 months follow-up, no complications related to the laparoscopic-endoscopic procedure were observed. CONCLUSION: The intraoperative combined laparoscopic-endoscopic approach seems to be a feasible and effective management of cholecysto-choledocholithiasis, saving patients a subsequent invasive procedure.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

Endoscopic treatment of pancreatic duct stones using a 10F pancreatoscope and electrohydraulic lithotripsy.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic therapy with adjunctive extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy fails to provide clearance of pancreatic duct stones in up to 25% of symptomatic patients. Direct contact lithotripsy may provide an additional option for removal of refractory stones. We report our initial experience using a prototype 10F "baby" endoscope to administer electrohydraulic lithotripsy. METHODS: Five patients failing extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and one patient with recurrent pancreatic duct stones after surgery were selected to undergo endoscopic electrohydraulic lithotripsy. After pancreatic sphincterotomy and balloon dilation (8 or 10 mm), the 10F endoscope was introduced and electrohydraulic lithotripsy was used to fragment stones under direct visualization. RESULTS: Six patients underwent 9 intraductal electrohydraulic lithotripsy procedures. Complete or partial pancreatic duct clearance was accomplished in all but one. No complications from the lithotripsy procedure were noted. The 5 patients with partial or complete duct clearance experienced complete relief of abdominal pain of at least 6 months' duration following their final procedure. CONCLUSION: Electrohydraulic lithotripsy within the pancreatic duct provides an adjunctive endoscopic option for treatment of patients with symptomatic pancreatic duct stones. Our initial experience suggests that electrohydraulic lithotripsy therapy can successfully fragment stones refractory to conventional endoscopic stone extraction methods or extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Further experience is necessary to establish the risks of electrohydraulic lithotripsy within the pancreatic duct.

Aged↗
PubMed1998

Endoscopic harvest of saphenous vein graft for coronary artery bypass grafting: Saitama-Olympus technique.

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to examine the clinical feasibility of a newly developed video-assisted endoscopic technique (Saitama-Olympus technique) to harvest saphenous vein graft (SVG) in 40 CABG patients. METHODS: There were 37 males and three females with an average age of 59+/-11 years. The special instruments developed were optical sheath, solid dilators, tunnel retractor, vessel dissector, GCC forceps which were utilized in conjunction with the thoracoscopic surgery system (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). The course of the saphenous vein (SV) was marked on the skin prior to operation. SV was identified in the femoral region with a 4-cm skin incision and dissected with an open technique. The anterior surface of SV was dissected for 30 cm by the optical sheath mounted on the endoscope. Then another 4-cm skin incision above SV was placed in the popliteal region, resulting in a subcutaneous space over the SV. The subcutaneous space was then dilated and maintained with the tunnel retractor which has an endoscope channel at the top. With this system SV was visualized stably by endoscope without any assistance. All side branches were dissected and divided with the vessel dissector. When longer SVG is required, the same procedure was extended to the ankle with additional one or two skin incisions. RESULTS: SV was easily harvested in all patients with spending 15-84 min. The average number of skin incisions was 2.4+/-0.5 and the average length of the harvested SVG was 41+/-12 cm. The average number of bypassed grafts was 3.4+/-1.0 with use of left internal mammary artery (IMA) in 31 patients. The average operation time was 272+/-52 min, there were no significant prolongation relating to endoscopic SVG harvesting. The remainder of SVG in each patients was pathologically examined and there were no evidence of intimal injury. There were no major wound complications during the average follow-up of 10+/-4 months and this technique seemed to be advantageous for patients with less wound pain and better cosmetic appearance. CONCLUSIONS: The Saitama-Olympus technique to endoscopically harvest the SV is a clinically feasible surgical technique with the unique potential of a significant reduction in morbidity and decreased wound scarring in CABG patients.

Coronary Artery Bypass↗
PubMed1999

Endoscopic pituitary surgery.

Endoscopy has been adopted for transsphenoidal pituitary surgery. A rigid rod-lens endoscope, 4-mm in diameter and 18 cm in length, is used in replacement of the operating microscope. This endoscopic technique utilizes the patient's natural nasal air passage as a surgical corridor without a sublabial or nasal mucosal incision. The use of a transsphenoidal retractor is not necessary. Postoperative nasal packing is not required. The average length of a patient's hospital stay is overnight. Postoperative discomfort is minimal. An angled lens endoscope enables the surgeon to operate on tumors located in the suprasellar region under direct visualization. When the adoption of endoscopy in transsphenoidal pituitary surgery had demonstrated obvious advantages over conventional microscopic surgery, the use of this endoscopic endonasal technique has been expanded to include other skull base lesions at the anterior fossa skull base, cavernous sinus, clivus and clival posterior fossa. In this chapter, the author describes the evolution of this endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery, the pertinent sinonasal anatomy related to transsphenoidal endoscopy, the details of endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal pituitary surgery, surgical approaches to the other skull base lesions, surgical results, and potential complications and their avoidance.

Adenoma↗
PubMed2002

Antibiotic prophylaxis prior to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with obstructive jaundice: is it worth the cost?

BACKGROUND: There are few published data concerning the economic impact of antibiotic prophylaxis prior to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the setting of biliary obstruction. AIM: To perform decision analysis to determine the costs of prophylaxis in patients undergoing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for obstructive jaundice. METHODS: A decision analysis model was constructed. The probability of biliary sepsis, death and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography complications was obtained from the medical literature and from a retrospective analysis of our own experience. Costs were obtained from Medicare reimbursement at our institution. The strategies evaluated were endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with and without single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis. We compared the total costs, number of episodes of cholangitis and deaths associated with each strategy. RESULTS: Based on published data and the results of our retrospective analysis, the strategy of administering single-dose prophylactic antibiotics prior to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with obstructive jaundice resulted in lower total costs, fewer episodes of cholangitis and fewer deaths compared to a strategy of not administering antibiotics. The results were sensitive to the rates of cholangitis, cost of antibiotics and the cost of treating an episode of cholangitis. CONCLUSIONS: Antibiotic prophylaxis prior to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography results in fewer cases of cholangitis and is cost saving when compared to a strategy of no prophylaxis in patients with obstructive jaundice.

Antibiotic Prophylaxis↗
PubMed2002

Biliary guidewire facilitates bile duct biopsy and endoscopic drainage.

BACKGROUND: The introduction of a guidewire through bile duct strictures may facilitate transpapillary bile duct biopsy and subsequent biliary drainage. METHODS: Endoscopic bile duct biopsy was attempted in 61 patients with bile duct strictures. After the introduction of a guidewire into the bile duct, biopsy forceps were inserted via the papilla. Both devices were inserted through the working channel (3.2 mm in diameter) of a conventional duodenoscope. After the procedure, an endoscopic naso-biliary drainage catheter was advanced along the guidewire. The success rate of inserting the biopsy forceps, the sensitivity of the biopsy, and the success rate of endoscopic biliary drainage after the biopsy were analyzed prospectively. RESULTS: The final diagnosis was malignant strictures in 50 patients and benign strictures in 11. The success rate of inserting biopsy forceps without performing endoscopic papillary balloon dilation was 85%. The sensitivity of the biopsy for primary bile duct cancer (83%) was significantly higher (P < 0.05) than that of pancreatic cancer (47%). All patients had successful endoscopic biliary drainage after the procedure. CONCLUSION: A previously placed guidewire facilitates insertion of biopsy forceps and endoscopic biliary drainage. The histological diagnosis of cancer is more likely with bile duct cancer than with pancreatic cancer.

Bile Duct Neoplasms↗
PubMed1999

Efficacy of conventional endoscopic disinfection and sterilization methods against Helicobacter pylori contamination.

BACKGROUND: Iatrogenic transmission of Helicobacter pylori via contaminated endoscopic devices is well documented. Despite the prevalence of this infectious agent, few controlled studies have investigated the major factors that impact on reprocessing of endoscopes contaminated with H. pylori. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An endoscope (Pentax) was contaminated with 108 cfu/ml of H. pylori in 5% bovine calf serum as standardized inoculum. The endoscope then was passed through one of eight arms (five repetitions per arm = 40 total runs), as follows: 1, recovery control (no cleaning or disinfection); 2, manual cleaning alone; 3-5, manual precleaning followed by either 10-, 20-, or 45-minute exposure to 2% glutaraldehyde and ethanol (ETOH) drying; 6, manual cleaning followed by automated reprocessing by STERIS System; 7 and 8, automated reprocessing by STERIS with and without active peracetic acid sterilant (wash-off control). Suction-biopsy channels and air-water channels were harvested for microbiological culture. RESULTS: Control runs recovered more than 1 x 106 cfu per site, confirming the viability of the test organism and the adequacy of the biological burden for challenge. When instruments underwent manual cleaning alone (without subsequent disinfection), test organisms remained in 40% of runs at the air-water site. Manual cleaning followed by 10-, 20-, or 45-minute glutaraldehyde exposure and ETOH drying removed all test organisms from all sites in all runs (i.e., 100% disinfection). The automated STERIS system with or without active peracetic acid sterilant also removed all test organisms from all sites in all runs, as did manual cleaning followed by STERIS use. CONCLUSION: Manual cleaning alone does not effectively remove H. pylori from an endoscope. Current joint association recommendations for minimal disinfection (manual cleaning followed by at least 20 minutes of immersion in glutaraldehyde and ETOH drying) are effective in preventing cross-transmission of H. pylori. Reprocessing using the automated STERIS system according to manufacturer's recommendations also is highly effective in sterilizing endoscopes contaminated with H. pylori.

Cross Infection↗
PubMed2000

Thermal probes alone or with epinephrine for the endoscopic haemostasis of ulcer haemorrhage.

In the last two decades, significant progress has been made in the diagnosis, prognostication and treatment of patients with severe peptic ulcer haemorrhage. Patients can now be risk stratified by clinical presentation and endoscopic stigmata of ulcer haemorrhage. The purposes of this chapter are to discuss: (1) the techniques of thermal probe with or without epinephrine for haemostasis of ulcers with major stigmata of haemorrhage and (2) the outcomes of treatment of patients with ulcer haemorrhage treated with endoscopic thermal probes or other therapies, medical therapy and/or surgery. Compared to medical therapy alone, patients with major stigmata actively bleeding ulcers, non-bleeding visible vessels and non-bleeding adherent clots have been shown to benefit from endoscopic haemostasis with bipolar probe, heater probe, lasers or epinephrine injection. Outcomes showing significant improvement include blood transfusions, emergency surgery rates and length of hospital stay. Meta-analyses have also reported improvements in mortality for endoscopic compared with medical therapy of patients with severe ulcer haemorrhage and major stigmata. Patients with minor stigmata of ulcer haemorrhage (such as flat spots) or no stigmata (clean-based ulcers) do not benefit from endoscopic haemostasis. Thermal probes have the advantages of good coaptive coagulation, target irrigation, portability and relative inexpense. Recently, patients with active arterial bleeding, non-bleeding adherent clots or non-bleeding visible vessels have been reported to have better results with combination epinephrine injection and thermal probe compared to monotherapy alone (such as injection, bipolar or heater probe). In addition, repeat endoscopic combination therapy has been reported to be as effective but safer than emergency surgery for management of recurrent ulcer haemorrhage.

Duodenal Ulcer↗
PubMed1999

GI endoscopic reprocessing practices in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Patient infection from contaminated gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopes can generally be attributed to failure to follow appropriate reprocessing guidelines. Recently, the Food and Drug Administration recommended a 45-minute exposure of GI endoscopes to 2.4% glutaraldehyde solutions heated to 25 degrees C. Simultaneously, the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE), the American Gastroenterological Association, and the Society of Gastroenterology Nurses and Associates endorsed a reprocessing guideline that emphasized manual precleaning and recommended a 20-minute exposure to a 2.4% glutaraldehyde solution at room temperature. Since then, little information has become available regarding actual reprocessing practices in the United States. METHODS: A previously developed questionnaire regarding endoscopic disinfection practices was mailed to randomly selected members of the ASGE. RESULTS: The survey was sent to 730 members and 294 responded (40.3%). Appropriate manual cleaning (suctioning detergent through the accessory channel and brushing the channel and valves) is performed by 90.7% of respondents; 69.9% then use automated reprocessors for disinfection or sterilization. Glutaraldehyde is the most widely used chemical disinfectant; 85.3% use glutaraldehyde as one of their primary disinfectants. The most commonly used disinfection time with 2.4% glutaraldehyde is 20 minutes (83.9%) followed by 45 minutes (11.4%). Only 23.8% of users of 2.4% glutaraldehyde heat their solution; 59.6% of centers test disinfectant concentration daily or more frequently; 74.0% sterilize nondisposable forceps before use; 29.2% of centers re-use disposable endoscopic accessories (which are more frequently disinfected rather than sterilized). Twelve respondents reported cases of endoscopic cross infection. CONCLUSIONS: A significant minority of endoscopy centers still do not completely conform to recent ASGE, American Gastroenterological Association, and the Society of Gastroenterology Nurses and Associates guidelines on disinfection, and they may not be appropriately disinfecting GI endoscopes. Rigid adherence to recommended guidelines is strongly encouraged to ensure patient safety.

Data Collection↗